Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.060
Filter
1.
Surg Clin North Am ; 104(3): 503-515, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38677816

ABSTRACT

Pilonidal disease and hidradenitis suppurativa affect healthy young adults, causing discomfort and pain that leads to loss of work productivity and should be approached in a personalized manner. Patients with pilonidal disease should engage in hair removal to the sacrococcygeal region and surgical options considered. Hidradenitis suppurativa can be a morbid and challenging disease process. Medical management with topical agents, antibiotics, and biologics should be used initially but wide local excision should be considered in severe or refractory cases of the disease.


Subject(s)
Hidradenitis Suppurativa , Pilonidal Sinus , Humans , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/therapy , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/surgery , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/complications , Hidradenitis Suppurativa/diagnosis , Pilonidal Sinus/surgery , Pilonidal Sinus/therapy , Pilonidal Sinus/diagnosis , Hair Removal/methods
3.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 171, 2024 Mar 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38468306

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pubic hair grooming involves the partial or complete removal of pubic hair, and it is a common practice among men and women. Grooming is more prevalent in women, who employ various methods such as shaving, waxing and laser removal. However, it is associated with variable rates of post-grooming adverse outcomes including lacerations and sexually transmitted infections (STIs). To the best of our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing women's sexual health outcomes between those who groom and those who don't. METHODS: We followed the MOOSE guidelines and conducted a computerized-based search using (PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Ovid Medline), till June 20th, 2022, for eligible studies using the relevant keywords; (pubic hair grooming) OR (pubic hair removal OR Genital hairless OR Bikini hair removal OR pubic hair depilation). Cross-sectional studies included which compared grooming practices among women in terms of motivation and health outcomes. Women's satisfaction and incidence of STIs were pooled as standardized mean difference (SMD) and odds ratio (OR) respectively. RESULTS: Twenty-Two cross-sectional studies were included in our review with 73,091 participant.The odds of having gram-negative gonorrheal and chlamydial infection in Pubic hair groomers were found to be statistically significant (OR = 1.55, 95% CI [1.31, 1.84], P < 0.001) (OR = 1.56, 95% CI [1.32, 1.85], P < 0.001] respectively. There was no difference between groomer and non-groomer women regarding viral infections such as genital herpes (OR = 1.40, 95% CI [0.56, 3.50], P = 0.47) and Condyloma acuminata (OR = 1.75, 95% CI [0.51, 6.01], P = 0.37). The most common grooming side effect is genital itching (prevalence = 26.9%, P < 0.001). Non-electrical razor (prevalence = 69.3%, P < 0.001) is the most common grooming method. White women (prevalence = 80.2%, P < 0.001) remove pubic hair more frequently compared to black women (prevalence = 12.2%, P < 0.001). Women practice complete grooming (50.3%, P < 0.001) of the pubic hair more frequently than partial grooming (33.1%, P < 0.001). There are no differences in women's satisfaction between the two groups (SMD = 0.12, 95% CI [-0.16, 0.40], P = 0.39). CONCLUSION: This review aligns with previous observational studies regarding sexual health outcomes of pubic hair grooming. There is a need to raise awareness among women regarding the safe practice of pubic hair grooming, emphasizing the clarification of hazards and benefits.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Sexual Health , Sexually Transmitted Diseases , Male , Animals , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Grooming , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Hair , Sexually Transmitted Diseases/epidemiology
4.
Body Image ; 49: 101701, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38520843

ABSTRACT

Previous studies have shown that cosmetic procedures and products that perpetuate Western hegemonic beauty standards among women have become increasingly popular, and pressures from sociocultural agents to utilize them are significant. However, little work has documented the relationship between perceived sociocultural pressures and use of cosmetic procedures and products among a larger age range of adult women. A community sample of 308 women aged 18-66, mean (SD) age of 35.7 (9.7), reported on the cosmetic procedures they had considered or used, as well as perceived pressures from the media, peers, romantic partners, and health and beauty professionals. Findings revealed that, among those investigated, the most frequently utilized products and procedures were supplements and hair removal. However, a significant minority reported considering more invasive procedures, including cosmetic surgery. Media was the predominant source of pressure, while partners were the least frequently endorsed. While pressure from professionals and peers had small-to-moderate associations with utilization of cosmetic products and procedures, pressure from partners had the largest association with their use. This work frames important future directions for examining the impact of sociocultural pressures on women's willingness to utilize cosmetic products and procedures that are sometimes underregulated and risky for physical and mental health.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Cosmetics , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Cosmetic Techniques/psychology , Beauty , Body Image/psychology , Mass Media/statistics & numerical data , Hair Removal/psychology , Surgery, Plastic/psychology , Peer Group
5.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(5): NP347-NP353, 2024 Apr 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299374

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser hair removal (LHR) is one of the most requested cosmetic procedures worldwide. A rare side effect is the appearance of excess hair around previously treated areas, known as paradoxical hypertrichosis. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to retrospectively identify the cause of this side effect. METHODS: This study included all patients who underwent LHR at our center between November 2018 and November 2020. Alexandrite laser hair removal (HR) or diode laser super hair removal (SHR) was performed in 70% and 30% of cases, respectively. Clinical features and daily habits of patients with and without postlaser hypertrichosis were compared. RESULTS: Of the 7381 patients who received LHR, 25 patients (0.34%) demonstrated an increase in hair growth compared to baseline. Of these 25 patients, 24 had been treated with alexandrite laser HR (P < .01). The most common site was the upper arm, followed by the periareolar area. Daily sun protection was associated with a significantly lower incidence of hypertrichosis (P < .05), as was confirmed and shown to be independent of Fitzpatrick skin type by binary logistic regression analysis (odds ratio = 0.41, P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In our clinic, we observed paradoxical hypertrichosis after laser hair removal in a small minority of cases, as described by others. We did not observe differences in incidence related to skin type, but daily sun protection and LHR with diode laser SHR were associated with significant reductions in incidence rates. In addition to previously reported common sites, we also identified the periareolar area as a high-risk region.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Hypertrichosis , Laser Therapy , Humans , Hypertrichosis/epidemiology , Hypertrichosis/etiology , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Hair Removal/methods , Retrospective Studies , Upper Extremity , Lasers , Laser Therapy/adverse effects
6.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 41(3): 410-420, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38413364

ABSTRACT

Unwanted hair is a common concern among patients presenting to pediatric dermatology clinics, and parents and patients alike inquire about the safety of methods employed for elective removal. Various methods of hair removal exist with different levels of invasiveness and permanence, from simple mechanical depilation to light-based therapies. All methods of hair removal appear to be safe and generally well tolerated in children, and there are no age restrictions to any modality. In this review, we aim to address the available literature on the safety and efficacy of hair removal modalities in pediatric patients and propose guidance on how to manage requests for at-home and in-office therapies within an ethical framework.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Humans , Child , Hair Removal/methods
7.
Arch Sex Behav ; 53(5): 2003-2010, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38424326

ABSTRACT

Penile inversion vaginoplasty (PIV) is a gender-affirming surgical procedure where the skin of the penis and scrotum is reconstructed into the neovaginal lining. To prevent hair-bearing skin from becoming incorporated into the neovaginal canal, transgender patients are encouraged to undergo hair removal of their external genitalia. The goal of this preoperative hair removal is to minimize the risk of potential hair-related complications after vaginoplasty. To better support patients seeking preoperative hair removal and identify current treatment barriers, we surveyed patients about their progress and satisfaction with hair removal. A cross-sectional survey was constructed to assess patient experiences with hair removal in advance of PIV. Sixty-seven patients met the inclusion criteria, of which 46 participated (68.7%). Both laser hair removal (LHR) and electrolysis were used. Although all patients had completed some preoperative hair removal at the time of survey (average of 14 sessions), the cohort completed only two-thirds of their total expected hair clearance. Multiple peri-procedural pain management therapies were employed, but overall satisfaction with pain management was low (57.4 ± 5.0 out of 100). LHR was associated with significantly lower procedural pain compared to electrolysis (p < .001). The average global satisfaction with the hair removal process was 57.9 ± 5.7 and incidents of mistreatment were associated with a statistically significant reduction in overall satisfaction (p = .02). Most patients felt that hair removal was important prior to surgery. Overall, LHR and electrolysis were both utilized as effective preoperative hair removal modalities; however, LHR has better pain tolerability than electrolysis.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Patient Satisfaction , Penis , Humans , Hair Removal/methods , Male , Female , Adult , Penis/surgery , Cross-Sectional Studies , Vagina/surgery , Sex Reassignment Surgery/methods , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Preoperative Care/methods
8.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(4): 1282-1290, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38348571

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Performing laser hair removal treatments on dark skin is limited by the quantity of melanin within the skin. To minimize side effects, lower values of fluence are selected when using standard 755 or 810 nm diode lasers. However, this approach may limit the effectiveness of the procedure, particularly when treating areas with thin and less pigmented hair, which is often the case in facial regions. To improve results, high-power triple wavelength diode lasers can be used. This study aims to assess the efficacy, safety, and comfort of treatments that remove facial hair with a high-power triple wavelength diode laser (810, 940, and 1060 nm) in static mode on Asian patients with thin and less pigmented hair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-center retrospective cohort study was carried out using a high-power triple wavelength diode laser (810, 940, and 1060 nm), with a 2.7 cm2 spot size, on faces with thin and less pigmented hair. The study comprised 23 subjects with Fitzpatrick skin types IV and V. Effectiveness was measured by counting the hairs that appeared in high-resolution photos taken prior to and following the procedure, in addition to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Furthermore, mathematical 3D simulations were created on the COMSOL Multiphysics® software to allow for comparisons to be made with regard to thermal damage sustained by the hair follicles and epidermal heating. Assessments were also made in relation to side effects. RESULTS: An average of 66% hair reduction was observed. Patient satisfaction was between 4 and 5 points on the GAIS scale, indicating that the treatment was very well received and tolerated. Adverse side effects were not observed. CONCLUSION: It can be concluded that the use of a high-power triple wavelength diode laser (810, 940, and 1060 nm) is safe and effective for the treatment of very fine and less pigmented facial hair on Asian skin. Furthermore, a triple wavelength (810, 940, and 1060 nm) laser is absorbed less by the melanin in the skin, enabling the use of higher fluences in stamping mode, with greater efficacy and safety for darker skin.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Lasers, Semiconductor , Humans , Lasers, Semiconductor/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Melanins , Treatment Outcome , Hair , Hair Removal/adverse effects , Hair Removal/methods
9.
Eye Contact Lens ; 50(3): 152-157, 2024 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38345025

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Demodex folliculorum blepharitis is typically confirmed with lash epilation and microscopic identification of mites. However, mite counts may vary with the epilation technique. As there is no gold standard to epilating lashes for the purposes of mite counts, the aim of this study was to compare three epilation techniques. METHOD: A prospective randomized double-blind study compared three epilation techniques on lashes with cylindrical dandruff. Techniques included (A) direct pulling of the lash; (B) rotating the lash before epilation; and (C) sliding the cylindrical dandruff away, lash rotation, and epilation. Mean mite counts were analyzed using a repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: Forty (n=40) participants (20 M: 20 F, mean age of 62.3±17.1 years) revealed similar mite counts between right (1.43±1.74) and left (1.35±1.59) eyes ( P =0.63). A significant difference ( P =0.03) in mite count was noted (technique A: 1.05 ± 1.60; technique B 1.76 ± 1.80; and technique C 1.36 ± 1.54) with technique B yielding the highest mite count ( P =0.04). CONCLUSION: Demodex mite count is a key parameter in establishing infestation or to determine treatment efficacy. This study revealed that rotating the lash before epilation yielded the highest mite count. Future studies should report the epilation technique used to allow for study comparisons.


Subject(s)
Blepharitis , Dandruff , Eye Infections, Parasitic , Eyelashes , Hair Removal , Mite Infestations , Mites , Aged , Animals , Humans , Middle Aged , Blepharitis/therapy , Double-Blind Method , Eye Infections, Parasitic/diagnosis , Eye Infections, Parasitic/therapy , Mite Infestations/diagnosis , Mite Infestations/therapy , Prospective Studies , Male , Female
10.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(4): 1344-1350, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38197285

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Long-hair follicular unit excision (LHF) is gaining popularity, especially for hairline restoration, because it helps avoid hair removal in the donor area and provides better immediate postoperative results. AIMS: This study aimed to assess the postoperative clinical outcomes of LHF for hairline restoration. PATIENTS/METHODS: Data from 248 patients (223 women and 25 men) who underwent hairline restoration with LHF between September 2018 and June 2022 were analyzed, and they were followed up immediately and 9 months postoperatively. The complications and survival rate of long-hair grafts were assessed. Patient postoperative satisfaction was assessed using a 5-Point Likert Scale. The Generic Quality of Life Inventory-74 (GQOLI-74) assessed the quality of the postoperative life. RESULTS: The planned extraction density was set at 15-25 FU/cm2. The mean number of total extracted hair grafts, transection rate in the extraction area, and extraction time were 1970 ± 124 FU, 3.9 ± 0.2%, and 3.2 ± 0.8 h, respectively. The hairline implantation density was set at 50-70 FU/cm2. The mean number of total transplanted hair grafts was 2031 ± 371 FU; the implant time was 3.8 ± 1.9 h. No serious complications occurred within 7 days postoperatively. The mean graft survival rate was 93.1 ± 1.3% at 9 months postoperatively. All patients were satisfied with the immediate postoperative results, and most were satisfied with the 9-month outcomes (mean overall satisfaction score: 4.7). The scores of physical function, psychological function, social function and material life function after operation were higher than those before operation (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hairline restoration with LHF could enhance the cosmetic outcomes and be widely used in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Hair , Male , Humans , Female , Hair/transplantation , Retrospective Studies , Quality of Life , China , Hair Follicle/transplantation , Alopecia/surgery
11.
Skin Res Technol ; 30(2): e13598, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38279588

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While shaving-induced erythema is a common inflammatory skin issue, there is a lack of quantitative information on how well a shaving product performs in this regard. In this study, multispectral near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) imaging was used to quantitatively and qualitatively measure the extent of shaving-induced erythema. The research compares a safety razor and a cartridge razor to evaluate their impact on skin irritation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine healthy male volunteers without pre-existing skin conditions were enrolled. Basic demographics were recorded, and participants' faces or necks were imaged before shaving. Shaving was conducted on the right side of the face/neck with the safety razor and on the left side of the face/neck using the 3-blade cartridge razor. Images were captured immediately after shaving, at 5 and 10 min post-shaving. RESULTS: Tissue oxygen saturation (StO2) measurements demonstrated that the safety razor induced significantly less erythema than the cartridge razor. Immediately after shaving, 40.3% of skin shaved with the safety razor had erythema compared to 57.6% for the cartridge razor. At 5 min post-shaving, 36.5% of skin shaved with the safety razor had erythema, compared to 53.8% of cartridge razor. CONCLUSIONS: Multispectral NIRS revealed significant differences in shaving-induced erythema between safety and cartridge razors. Safety razors demonstrated a lower incidence of erythema, suggesting a potential advantage for individuals prone to skin irritation. This study contributes valuable insights into skin irritation and highlights the potential of multispectral NIRS in dermatology research.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Humans , Male , Hair Removal/methods , Spectroscopy, Near-Infrared , Skin/diagnostic imaging , Erythema/diagnostic imaging
13.
JAMA Dermatol ; 160(1): 111-113, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38055241

ABSTRACT

This survey study describes an opportunity for a partnership between barbers and dermatologists to identify, evaluate, and treat pseudofolliculitis barbae in the Black male population.


Subject(s)
Folliculitis , Hair Diseases , Hair Removal , Humans , Folliculitis/diagnosis , Folliculitis/therapy
14.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 26(1): 85-90, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37878767

ABSTRACT

Importance: Laser hair removal is a noninvasive technique that has been used for patients with oropharyngolaryngeal hair growth related to surgical flap reconstruction after head and neck cancer resection. The purpose of this work was to perform a rapid review of the literature to determine the therapeutic relevance of laser hair removal and identify laser parameters. Observations: A total of 10 publications addressing depilation of the head and neck sphere were selected and analyzed. Conclusions and Relevance: Laser therapy appears to be a promising treatment for hair removal from flaps with few side effects. However, there is no scientific basis for a standardized protocol or determination of the superiority of laser hair removal over another treatment.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Plastic Surgery Procedures , Humans , Hair Removal/methods , Skin Transplantation/methods , Surgical Flaps , Lasers
15.
Int J Cosmet Sci ; 46(2): 175-198, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37923568

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Electrical epilation of unwanted hair is a widely used hair removal method, but it is largely unknown how this affects the biology of human hair follicles (HF) and perifollicular skin. Here, we have begun to explore how mechanical epilation changes selected key biological read-out parameters ex vivo within and around the pilosebaceous unit. METHODS: Human full-thickness scalp skin samples were epilated ex vivo using an electro-mechanical device, organ-cultured for up to 6 days in serum-free, supplemented medium, and assessed at different time points by quantitative (immuno-)histomorphometry for selected relevant read-out parameters in epilated and sham-epilated control samples. RESULTS: Epilation removed most of the hair shafts, often together with fragments of the outer and inner root sheath and hair matrix. This was associated with persistent focal thinning of the HF basal membrane, decreased melanin content of the residual HF epithelium, and increased HF keratinocyte apoptosis, including in the bulge, yet without affecting the number of cytokeratin 15+ HF epithelial stem cells. Sebocyte apoptosis in the peripheral zone was increased, albeit without visibly altering sebum production. Epilation transiently perturbed HF immune privilege, and increased the expression of ICAM-1 in the bulge and bulb mesenchyme, and the number of perifollicular MHC class II+ cells as well as mast cells around the distal epithelium and promoted mast cell degranulation around the suprabulbar and bulbar area. Moreover, compared to controls, several key players of neurogenic skin inflammation, itch, and/or thermosensation (TRPV1, TRPA1, NGF, and NKR1) were differentially expressed in post-epilation skin. CONCLUSION: These data generated in denervated, organ-cultured human scalp skin demonstrate that epilation-induced mechanical HF trauma elicits surprisingly complex biological responses. These may contribute to the delayed re-growth of thinner and lighter hair shafts post-epilation and temporary post-epilation discomfort. Our findings also provide pointers regarding the development of topically applicable agents that minimize undesirable sequelae of epilation.


OBJECTIF: L'épilation électrique des poils indésirables est une méthode d'épilation largement utilisée, mais on ne connaît pas l'ampleur de son effet sur la biologie des follicules pileux humains (FP) et de la peau périfolliculaire. Dans cette étude, nous avons commencé à explorer comment l'épilation mécanique modifie certains paramètres de mesures biologiques clés ex vivo à l'intérieur et autour de l'unité pilo­sébacée. MÉTHODES: Des échantillons de peau du cuir chevelu humain de pleine épaisseur ont été épilés ex vivo à l'aide d'un dispositif électromécanique, cultivés biologiquement pendant un maximum de 6 jours dans un milieu complet sans sérum, et évalués à différents moments par (immuno­)histomorphométrie quantitative pour certains paramètres de mesures pertinents dans des échantillons avec épilation et des échantillons témoins avec épilation simulée. RÉSULTATS: L'épilation a enlevé la plupart des poils, souvent avec des fragments de la gaine de la racine externe et de la matrice pileuse. Cela a été associé à un amincissement focal persistant de la membrane basale du FP, à une diminution de la teneur en mélanine de l'épithélium résiduel du FP et à une augmentation de l'apoptose des kératinocytes du FP, y compris dans la surface arrondie, mais sans affecter le nombre de cellules souches épithéliales du FP positives pour la cytokératine 15. L'apoptose des sébocytes de la zone périphérique était augmentée, sans pour autant altérer visiblement la production de sébum. L'épilation a temporairement perturbé l'immunoprivilège du FP et a augmenté l'expression de l'ICAM­1 dans la surface arrondie et le mésenchyme du bulbe, ainsi que le nombre de cellules périfolliculaires du CMH de classe II et des mastocytes autour de l'épithélium distal, et a favorisé la dégranulation des mastocytes autour de la zone supra­bulbaire et bulbaire. En outre, par rapport aux échantillons témoins, plusieurs acteurs clés de l'inflammation neurogène cutanée, de la démangeaison et/ou de la thermosensation (TRPV1, TRPA1, NGF et NKR1) ont été exprimés de manière différentielle dans la peau après l'épilation. CONCLUSION: Ces données générées dans la peau du cuir chevelu humain dénervée et cultivée biologiquement démontrent que le traumatisme du FP induit par l'épilation mécanique provoque des réponses biologiques étonnamment complexes. Celles­ci peuvent contribuer à retarder la repousse des poils plus fins et plus clairs après l'épilation, et à provoquer une gêne temporaire après l'épilation. Nos résultats fournissent également des pistes concernant le développement d'agents applicables par voie topique qui minimisent les séquelles indésirables de l'épilation.


Subject(s)
Hair Follicle , Hair Removal , Humans , Hair Removal/methods , Skin/metabolism , Hair , Scalp
16.
JAMA Surg ; 159(1): 19-27, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37938854

ABSTRACT

Importance: Recurrence continues to be a significant challenge in the treatment and management of pilonidal disease. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of laser epilation (LE) as an adjunct to standard care vs standard care alone in preventing recurrence of pilonidal disease in adolescents and young adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a single-institution, randomized clinical trial with 1-year follow-up conducted from September 2017 to September 2022. Patients aged 11 to 21 years with pilonidal disease were recruited from a single tertiary children's hospital. Intervention: LE and standard care (improved hygiene and mechanical or chemical depilation) or standard care alone. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the rate of recurrence of pilonidal disease at 1 year. Secondary outcomes assessed during the 1-year follow-up included disability days, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), health care satisfaction, disease-related attitudes and perceived stigma, and rates of procedures, surgical excisions, and postoperative complications. Results: A total of 302 participants (median [IQR] age, 17 [15-18] years; 157 male [56.1%]) with pilonidal disease were enrolled; 151 participants were randomly assigned to each intervention group. One-year follow-up was available for 96 patients (63.6%) in the LE group and 134 (88.7%) in the standard care group. The proportion of patients who experienced a recurrence within 1 year was significantly lower in the LE treatment arm than in the standard care arm (-23.2%; 95% CI, -33.2 to -13.1; P < .001). Over 1 year, there were no differences between groups in either patient or caregiver disability days, or patient- or caregiver-reported HRQOL, health care satisfaction, or perceived stigma at any time point. The LE group had significantly higher Child Attitude Toward Illness Scores (CATIS) at 6 months (median [IQR], 3.8 [3.4-4.2] vs 3.6 [3.2-4.1]; P = .01). There were no differences between groups in disease-related health care utilization, disease-related procedures, or postoperative complications. Conclusions and Relevance: LE as an adjunct to standard care significantly reduced 1-year recurrence rates of pilonidal disease compared with standard care alone. These results provide further evidence that LE is safe and well tolerated in patients with pilonidal disease. LE should be considered a standard treatment modality for patients with pilonidal disease and should be available as an initial treatment option or adjunct treatment modality for all eligible patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03276065.


Subject(s)
Hair Removal , Pilonidal Sinus , Child , Humans , Male , Adolescent , Young Adult , Hair Removal/methods , Quality of Life , Pilonidal Sinus/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications , Lasers , Recurrence , Treatment Outcome
18.
J Pediatr Surg ; 59(4): 667-671, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38142191

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Laser epilation (LE) is effective in decreasing pilonidal disease (PD) recurrence, but laser use has not been a standard practice in pediatric surgery clinic. We hypothesized that "appointment tickets" can 1) track utilization and clinic visit delays, 2) inform patients of their clinic progress in real time. METHODS: An observation study was performed on LE patients treated at our PD clinic 3/2021-7/2022. Two exam rooms were utilized for manual shaving and one for LE. After gluteal cleft hair shaving, various anesthetic (topical lidocaine, ice, or cryotherapy) was applied prior/during LE. At each visit, patient received an "appointment ticket" on which providers recorded the visit start/end time, manual shaving duration, local anesthetic application/wait time, LE duration. Visits were scheduled for 20 min-slots. Clinic staff recorded any delays (>20 min). RESULTS: 1317 visits were recorded. Mean number of visits per week was 18 ± 6. Mean total visit length was 60 ± 22 min, mean shaving time 15 ± 11 min, mean anesthetic application/wait time 16 ± 11 min, mean LE time 14 ± 9 min. Over the study period, average visit length has decreased, and average visits/clinic day has increased. Most delays occurred in months April, May, October-December. Delays due to patient late arrival occurred in May, July, and August of 2021, none in 2022. CONCLUSIONS: LE visits have multiple components that required close coordination to ensure no clinic delays. Clinic delays spiked prior to summer and winter holidays. "Appointment tickets" provided patients with real-time visit progress tracked clinic utilization to improve the quality of pilonidal care delivery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics , Hair Removal , Child , Humans , Quality Improvement , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Lasers
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...