Emergency Medical Access Control System Based on Public Blockchain.

IT has made significant progress in various fields over the past few years, with many industries transitioning from paper-based to electronic media. However, sharing electronic medical records remains a long-term challenge, particularly when patients are in emergency situations, making it difficult to access and control their medical information. Previous studies have proposed permissioned blockchains with limited participants or mechanisms that allow emergency medical information sharing to pre-designated participants. However, permissioned blockchains require prior participation by medical institutions, and limiting sharing entities restricts the number of potential partners. This means that sharing medical information with local emergency doctors becomes impossible if a patient is unconscious and far away from home, such as when traveling abroad. To tackle this challenge, we propose an emergency access control system for a global electronic medical information system that can be shared using a public blockchain, allowing anyone to participate. Our proposed system assumes that the patient wears a pendant with tamper-proof and biometric authentication capabilities. In the event of unconsciousness, emergency doctors can perform biometrics on behalf of the patient, allowing the family doctor to share health records with the emergency doctor through a secure channel that uses the Diffie-Hellman (DH) key exchange protocol. The pendant's biometric authentication function prevents unauthorized use if it is stolen, and we have tested the blockchain's fee for using the public blockchain, demonstrating that the proposed system is practical.

Information exchange, responsibilities and expectation management in interhospital transfers: a qualitative study of hospital medicine physicians and advanced practice providers.

INTRODUCTION: The transfer of patients between hospitals, known as interhospital transfer (IHT), is associated with higher rates of mortality, longer lengths of stay and greater resource utilisation compared with admissions from the emergency department. To characterise the IHT process and identify key barriers and facilitators to IHT care, we examined the experiences of physician and advanced practice provider (APP) hospital medicine clinicians who care for IHT patients transferred to their facility. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive study using semistructured interviews with adult medicine hospitalists from an academic acute care hospital that accepts approximately 4000 IHT patients annually. A combined inductive and deductive coding approach guided thematic analysis. RESULTS: We interviewed 30 hospitalists with a mean of 5.7 years of experience. Two-thirds of interviewees were physicians and one-third were APPs.They described IHTs as challenging when (1) exchanged information was incomplete, inaccurate, extraneous, and/or untimely, (2) uncertainty impacted care responsibilities and (3) healthcare team members and patients had differing care expectations. As a result, participants described patient safety issues such as delays in care and inappropriate triage of patients due to incomplete communication of clinical status changes.Recommended improvement strategies include (1) dedicated individuals performing IHT tasks to improve consistency of information exchanged and relationships with transferring clinicians, (2) standardised scripts and documentation, (3) bidirectional communication, (4) interdisciplinary training and (5) shared understanding of care needs and expectations. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians and APP hospital medicine clinicians at an accepting hospital found information exchange, care responsibilities and expectation management challenging in IHT. In turn, hospitalists perceived a negative impact on IHT patient care and safety. Highly reliable and timely information transfer, standardisation of IHT processes and clear interdisciplinary communication may facilitate improved care for IHT patients.

Consumer-Centered Consent Automation in Health Information Exchange.

Considering consumer preferences, this paper proposes computer-readable policy expressions to govern data sharing and use in consent-based health information exchange. Consent automation is an essential component of digital health transformation efforts, enabling better consumer choices in using their sensitive data while unlocking new values through policy-aware workflow expressions. The approach is based on the HL7 FHIR standard while using the obligation and responsibility concepts formally defined in the ISO ODP Enterprise Language (ODP-EL) standard. These concepts were expressed using a domain specific language (DSL) to support code generation for integration with digital health applications. The approach enables improved interoperability, considering consent, privacy, security requirements, and the ability to adopt new business, regulative or jurisdictional policies. Additionally, it accommodates generative AI solutions for faster alignment with existing document-based policies, ensuring clear provenance. Finally, consent automation and a broader policy framework in the context of the latest Australian Government initiatives in digital health are discussed.

Putting patients at the center of health information exchange design: An exploration of patient preferences for data sharing.

BACKGROUND: Despite the many benefits of Health Information Exchange (HIE), Studies reported patients concerns about the privacy and security of sharing their health information. To address these concerns, it is important to understand their needs, preferences, and priorities in the design and implementing HIE systems. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to investigate patients' preferences for HIE consent option and examine the extent to which they are comfortable sharing the different parts of their medical records. METHOD: A self-administered survey was conducted. The survey was administrated online and the total number of respondents was 660 participants. RESULTS: The most popular option selected by participants for sharing HIE information was to share information with their permission once when they register (33.3%) followed by the option to share their information temporarily on demand during their clinical visit (23.8%). The types of information which participants were willing to share the most were general data such as age, weight, height, and gender, followed closely by data needed for medical emergency. In contrast, the information which participants were less likely to share were data related to financial status or income, followed by data related to sexual disease, and mental illnesses.

Developing a Sustainable Shared Child's Health Record in Low Resources Setting, Lao PDR.

Lao PDR's Ministry of Health has problem with fragmented data, lack of standardization, and inability to interoperate hinder child health data collection. Electronic health information exchange (HIE) could improve data quality and shared child health records (SCHR). In this study we developed the SCHR by interoperating with existing healthcare systems. The FHIR IPS standards were customized based on data elements. 14 experts from the technical working group (TWG) had determined the minimum dataset for data transactions and system testing was analyzed on the HAPI FHIR server. Used FHIR IPS standards for interoperability within Client Registry (CR-DHIS2), Electronic Immunization Record (EIR-DHIS2) and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) works well for data transactions. The initial result of the SCHR could be able to provide a real target child and to monitor full vaccination. However, prior to the actual deployment of the system, it is necessary to validate it and guarantee the confidentiality and safety of the data.

Development and Implementation of Semantic Information Standards for Oncology.

Data exchange in oncological healthcare is hindered by insufficient standardization agreements. An Information Standard comprises agreements facilitating accurate communication of care information with the necessary quality and timeliness. We introduce a structured approach to designing, implementing, and maintaining semantic information standards for oncology, supporting information use across medical scenarios. It consists of an element dataset organized into three tiers, ensuring comprehensive documentation and reliable information exchange. These agreements enhance health data interoperability and system functionality, governed by semantic standardization. Together with communication standards, they empower healthcare professionals with extensive medical records and grant patients control over their health data. Consequently, a high-quality semantic information standard supports both providers and patients, and is adequate during development and manageable during maintenance.

Investigating Decision Factors Affecting Subjective Description Disclosure in Health Information Exchange in Japan.

Despite the perceived advantages of health information exchange (HIE), their utilization has been stagnant, and a detailed survey at the regional level is needed to address this issue. We conducted interviews with operators of HIEs in operation in Japan as a pilot study and found that subjective descriptions by healthcare professionals contained in clinical notes are frequently referenced in HIEs. Currently, however, only a limited number of medical institutions in Japan disclose subjective descriptions. In this study, we aim to clarify the factors that influence whether or not to disclose subjective descriptions through an interview survey. Although the final results are yet to be determined, it is anticipated that the non-disclosing medical institutions will show negative aspects of disclosure, such as privacy concerns and misuse of information. Addressing the concerns raised in this study is important for the future dissemination of HIE.

Using Health IT Standards to Facilitate Metadata Exchange Between Research Data Management Systems.

The National Research Data Infrastructure for Personal Health Data (NFDI4Health) uses Local Data Hubs (LDHs) to manage locally research studies, documents and sensitive personal data to support controlled data sharing. While research data management (RDM) systems facilitate the storage and preparation of data and metadata as well as organizational access, they often lack support for interoperability standards of the application domain. To support the exchange with external registries of research studies, we chose 17 attributes to characterize the most relevant aspects of clinical trials (in the following named "metadata profile"). We implemented the metadata profile in the RDM system FAIRDOM SEEK using core attributes and SEEK's extended metadata feature and created a mapping conforming to the Health Level 7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard version R4. Finally, we implemented a prototype application interface for exports in FHIR-JSON format. We plan to extend the interface to serve central registries and support specific FHIR Implementation Guides from various use cases.

Data quality and timeliness analysis for post-vaccination adverse event cases reported through healthcare data exchange to FDA BEST pilot platform.

Introduction: This study is part of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)'s Biologics Effectiveness and Safety (BEST) initiative, which aims to improve the FDA's postmarket surveillance capabilities by using real-world data (RWD). In the United States, using RWD for postmarket surveillance has been hindered by the inability to exchange clinical data between healthcare providers and public health organizations in an interoperable format. However, the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology (ONC) has recently enacted regulation requiring all healthcare providers to support seamless access, exchange, and use of electronic health information through the interoperable HL7 Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) standard. To leverage the recent ONC changes, BEST designed a pilot platform to query and receive the clinical information necessary to analyze suspected AEs. This study assessed the feasibility of using the RWD received through the data exchange of FHIR resources to study post-vaccination AE cases by evaluating the data volume, query response time, and data quality. Materials and methods: The study used RWD from 283 post-vaccination AE cases, which were received through the platform. We used descriptive statistics to report results and apply 322 data quality tests based on a data quality framework for EHR. Results: The volume analysis indicated the average clinical resources for a post-vaccination AE case was 983.9 for the median partner. The query response time analysis indicated that cases could be received by the platform at a median of 3 min and 30 s. The quality analysis indicated that most of the data elements and conformance requirements useful for postmarket surveillance were met. Discussion: This study describes the platform's data volume, data query response time, and data quality results from the queried postvaccination adverse event cases and identified updates to current standards to close data quality gaps.

Road to a National Health Information Network: US Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA).

The Trusted Exchange Framework and Common Agreement (TEFCA) is a U.S. government initiative aimed at promoting the secure and interoperable exchange of electronic health information (EHI) across the healthcare ecosystem. In the U.S., TEFCA was established as part of the 21st Century Cures Act, signed into law in December 2016. Methods: A literature search using the PRISMA guidelines will be conducted through PubMed, CINAHL, Google Scholar, and Web of Science, for dates 2013-2024 will be conducted. Results will be demonstrated with a timeline, graphics, and written text on the key points of technical and operational standards for HIE, rules and expectations for data sharing under the Common Agreement, governance framework for implementation and enforcement principles, stakeholders and collaborators, and interoperability challenges. TEFCA seeks to improve patient care, reduce healthcare costs, and enhance overall healthcare quality by facilitating the seamless exchange of data between different healthcare entities. Sharing this information can contribute to nursing informatics practice and knowledge as the U.S. and other countries strive towards better interoperability in the race to improve patient care and outcomes using health information technology.

Data Consistency of Two National Registries in Iran: A Preliminary Assessment to Health Information Exchange.

BACKGROUND: The National Spinal Cord Injury Registry of Iran (NSCIR-IR) and the National Trauma Registry of Iran (NTRI) were established to meet the data needs for research and assessing trauma status in Iran. These registries have a group of patients shared by both registries, and it is expected that some identical data will be collected about them. A general question arises whether the spinal cord injury registry can receive part of the common data from the trauma registry and not collect them independently. METHODS: We examined variables captured in both registries based on structure and concept, identified the overlapping period during which both systems recorded data in the same centers and extracted relevant data from both registries. Further, we evaluated the data for any discrepancies in amount or nature and pinpointed the underlying reasons for any inconsistencies. RESULTS: Out of all the variables in the NSCIR-IR database, 18.6% of variables were similar to the NTRI in terms of concept and structure. Although four hospitals participated in both registries, only two (Sina and Beheshti Hospitals) had common cases. Patient names, prehospital intubation, ambulance arrival time, ICU length of stay, and admission time were consistent across both registries with no differences. Other common data variables had significant discrepancies. CONCLUSION: This study highlights the potential for health information exchange (HIE) between NSCIR-IR and NTRI and serves as a starting point for stakeholders and policymakers to understand the differences between the two registries and work toward the successful adoption of HIE.

An Innovative Approach to Using Electronic Health Records Through Health Information Exchange to Build a Chronic Disease Registry in Michigan.

Michigan's CHRONICLE, the Chronic Disease Registry Linking Electronic Health Record Data, is a near-real-time disease monitoring system designed to harness electronic health record (EHR) data and existing health information exchange (HIE) infrastructure for transformative public health surveillance. Strong evidence indicates that using EHR data in chronic disease monitoring will provide rapid insight over time on health care use, outcomes, and public health interventions. We examined the potential of EHR data for chronic disease surveillance through close collaboration with our statewide HIE network and 2 participating health systems. We describe the development of CHRONICLE, the promising findings from its implementation, the identified challenges, and how those challenges will inform the next steps in testing, refining, and expanding the system. By detailing our approach to developing CHRONICLE and the considerations and early steps required to build an innovative, EHR-based chronic disease registry, we aim to inform public health leaders and professionals on the value of EHR data for chronic disease surveillance. With systematic testing, evaluation, and enhancement, our goal for CHRONICLE, as a fully realized and comprehensive surveillance system, is to model how collaborative health information exchange can support evidence-based strategies, resource allocation, and precision in disease monitoring.

Brochure: Diálogos de saberes

Los diálogos de saberes, también llamados diálogos interculturales, son procesos de comunicación e intercambio entre personas, grupos o comunidades que provienen de diferentes orígenes o culturas. En el caso del sector de la salud, los intercambios se realizan entre determinados grupos o personas y personal de salud capacitado. Su objetivo es, entre otros, mejorar el acceso a los servicios de salud y construir una salud intercultural, con énfasis en la resolución de problemas previamente planteados y sus causas, la comprensión mutua y la creación de vínculos sólidos. Este brochure describe de manera general el proceso que tienen los diálogos de saberes.

Is Electronic Information Exchange Associated With Lower 30-Day Readmission Charges Among Medicare Beneficiaries?

OBJECTIVE: Fragmented readmissions, when admission and readmission occur at different hospitals, are associated with increased charges compared with nonfragmented readmissions. We assessed if hospital participation in health information exchange (HIE) was associated with differences in total charges in fragmented readmissions. DATA SOURCE: Medicare Fee-for-Service Data, 2018. STUDY DESIGN: We used generalized linear models with hospital referral region and readmission month fixed effects to assess relationships between information sharing (same HIE, different HIEs, and no HIE available) and total charges of 30-day readmissions among fragmented readmissions; analyses were adjusted for patient-level clinical/demographic characteristics and hospital-level characteristics. DATA EXTRACTION METHODS: We included beneficiaries with a hospitalization for acute myocardial infarction, congestive heart failure, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, syncope, urinary tract infection, dehydration, or behavioral issues with a 30-day readmission for any reason. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: In all, 279,729 admission-readmission pairs were included, 27% of which were fragmented (n=75,438); average charges of fragmented readmissions were $64,897-$71,606. Compared with fragmented readmissions where no HIE was available, the average marginal effects of same-HIE and different-HIE admission-readmission pairs were -$2329.55 (95% CI: -7333.73, 2674.62) and -$3905.20 (95% CI: -7592.85, -307.54), respectively. While the average marginal effects of different-HIE pairs were lower than those for no-HIE fragmented readmissions, the average marginal effects of same-HIE and different-HIE pairs were not significantly different from each other. CONCLUSIONS: There were no statistical differences in charges between fragmented readmissions to hospitals that share an HIE or that do not share an HIE compared with hospitals with no HIE available.

Redefining Health Care Data Interoperability: Empirical Exploration of Large Language Models in Information Exchange.

BACKGROUND: Efficient data exchange and health care interoperability are impeded by medical records often being in nonstandardized or unstructured natural language format. Advanced language models, such as large language models (LLMs), may help overcome current challenges in information exchange. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the capability of LLMs in transforming and transferring health care data to support interoperability. METHODS: Using data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III and UK Biobank, the study conducted 3 experiments. Experiment 1 assessed the accuracy of transforming structured laboratory results into unstructured format. Experiment 2 explored the conversion of diagnostic codes between the coding frameworks of the ICD-9-CM (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification), and Systematized Nomenclature of Medicine Clinical Terms (SNOMED-CT) using a traditional mapping table and a text-based approach facilitated by the LLM ChatGPT. Experiment 3 focused on extracting targeted information from unstructured records that included comprehensive clinical information (discharge notes). RESULTS: The text-based approach showed a high conversion accuracy in transforming laboratory results (experiment 1) and an enhanced consistency in diagnostic code conversion, particularly for frequently used diagnostic names, compared with the traditional mapping approach (experiment 2). In experiment 3, the LLM showed a positive predictive value of 87.2% in extracting generic drug names. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted the potential role of LLMs in significantly improving health care data interoperability, demonstrated by their high accuracy and efficiency in data transformation and exchange. The LLMs hold vast potential for enhancing medical data exchange without complex standardization for medical terms and data structure.

Social determinants of health predict readmission following COVID-19 hospitalization: a health information exchange-based retrospective cohort study.

Introduction: Since February 2020, over 104 million people in the United States have been diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection, or COVID-19, with over 8.5 million reported in the state of Texas. This study analyzed social determinants of health as predictors for readmission among COVID-19 patients in Southeast Texas, United States. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted investigating demographic and clinical risk factors for 30, 60, and 90-day readmission outcomes among adult patients with a COVID-19-associated inpatient hospitalization encounter within a regional health information exchange between February 1, 2020, to December 1, 2022. Results and discussion: In this cohort of 91,007 adult patients with a COVID-19-associated hospitalization, over 21% were readmitted to the hospital within 90 days (n = 19,679), and 13% were readmitted within 30 days (n = 11,912). In logistic regression analyses, Hispanic and non-Hispanic Asian patients were less likely to be readmitted within 90 days (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 0.8, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.7-0.9, and aOR: 0.8, 95% CI: 0.8-0.8), while non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to be readmitted (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.1, p = 0.002), compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Area deprivation index displayed a clear dose-response relationship to readmission: patients living in the most disadvantaged neighborhoods were more likely to be readmitted within 30 (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.0-1.2), 60 (aOR: 1.1, 95% CI: 1.2-1.2), and 90 days (aOR: 1.2, 95% CI: 1.1-1.2), compared to patients from the least disadvantaged neighborhoods. Our findings demonstrate the lasting impact of COVID-19, especially among members of marginalized communities, and the increasing burden of COVID-19 morbidity on the healthcare system.

Exploring the impact of primary care utilization and health information exchange upon treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

PURPOSE: There is limited literature describing care coordination for patients with glioblastoma (GBM). We aimed to investigate the impact of primary care and electronic health information exchange (HIE) between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and primary care providers (PCP) on GBM treatment patterns, postoperative outcomes, and survival. METHODS: We identified adult GBM patients undergoing primary resection at our institution (2007-2020). HIE was defined as shared electronic medical information between PCPs, oncologists, and neurosurgeons. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the effect of PCPs and HIE upon initiation and completion of adjuvant therapy. Kaplan-Meier and multivariate Cox regression models were used to evaluate overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 374 patients (mean age ± SD: 57.7 ± 13.5, 39.0% female), 81.0% had a PCP and 62.4% had electronic HIE. In multivariate analyses, having a PCP was associated with initiation (OR: 7.9, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 4.4, P < 0.001) of 6 weeks of concomitant chemoradiation, as well as initiation (OR: 4.0, P < 0.001) and completion (OR: 3.0, P = 0.007) of 6 cycles of maintenance temozolomide thereafter. Having a PCP (median OS [95%CI]: 14.6[13.1-16.1] vs. 10.8[8.2-13.3] months, P = 0.005) and HIE (15.40[12.82-17.98] vs. 13.80[12.51-15.09] months, P = 0.029) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts in Kaplan-Meier analysis and in multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.7, [95% CI] 0.5-1.0, P = 0.048). In multivariate analyses, chemoradiation (HR = 0.34, [95% CI] 0.2-0.7, P = 0.002) and maintenance temozolomide (HR = 0.5, 95%CI 0.3-0.8, P = 0.002) were associated with improved OS relative to counterparts. CONCLUSION: Effective care coordination between neurosurgeons, oncologists, and PCPs may offer a modifiable avenue to improve GBM outcomes.