ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: In the United States the percentage of Medicaid enrollees in some form of Medicaid managed care has increased more than seven-fold since 1990, e.g., up from 11% in 1991 to 82% in 2017. Yet little is known about whether and how this major change in Medicaid insurance affects how recipients use hospital emergency rooms. This study compares the performance of Medicaid health maintenance organizations (HMOs) and fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid regarding the occurrence of potentially preventable emergency department (ED) use. METHODS: Using data from the 2003-2015 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS), a nationally representative survey of the non-institutionalized US population, we estimated multivariable logistic regression models to examine the relationship between Medicaid HMO status and potentially preventable ED use. To accommodate the composition of the Medicaid population, we conducted separate repeated cross-sectional analyses for recipients insured through both Medicaid and Medicare (dual eligibles) and for those insured through Medicaid only (non-duals). We explicitly addressed the possibility of selection bias into HMOs in our models using propensity score weighting. RESULTS: We found that the type of Medicaid held by a recipient, i.e., whether an HMO or FFS coverage, was unrelated to the probability that an ED visit was potentially preventable. This finding emerged both among dual eligibles and among non-duals, and it occurred irrespective of the adopted analytical strategy. CONCLUSIONS: Within the U.S. Medicaid program, Medicaid HMO and FFS enrollees are indistinguishable in terms of the occurrence of potentially preventable ED use. Policymakers should consider this finding when evaluating the pros and cons of adopting Medicaid managed care.
Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Medicaid/economics , Medicare/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fee-for-Service Plans , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Middle Aged , Primary Health Care/economics , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Medicaid is integral to public health because it insures one in five Americans and half of the nation's births. Nearly two-thirds of all Medicaid recipients are currently enrolled in a health maintenance organization (HMO). Proponents of HMOs argue that they can lower costs while maintaining access and quality. We critically reviewed 32 studies on Medicaid managed care (2011-2019). Authors reported state-specific cost savings and instances of increased access or quality with implementation or redesign of Medicaid managed-care programs. Studies on high-risk populations (e.g., disabled) found improvements in quality specific to a state or a high-risk population. A unique model of managed care (i.e., the Oregon Health Plan) was associated with reduced costs and improved access and quality, but results varied by comparison state. New trends in the literature focused on analysis of auto-assignment algorithms, provider networks, and plan quality. More analysis of costs jointly with access/quality is needed, as is research on managing long-term care among elderly and disabled Medicaid recipients.
Subject(s)
Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Services Accessibility/statistics & numerical data , Managed Care Programs/economics , Medicaid/economics , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/trends , Humans , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Objective: To estimate all-claims-all-conditions expenditures paid for by health plans for patients suffering from Parkinson´s disease (PD). Methods: Using administrative claims data from two health maintenance organizations for 2014 and 2015 in Colombia, we identified 2,917 patients with PD by applying an algorithm that uses International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems and Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification System codes. Descriptive statistics were applied to compute unadjusted all-cause median costs. A generalized linear model was used to estimate adjusted and attributable direct costs of advanced PD. Results: Approximately 30% of the all-cause direct costs were associated with technologies not included in universal health coverage benefit packages. In 2015, the annual median interquartile range per patient all-cause direct costs to insurers was USD1,576 (605-3,617). About 16% of patients had advanced PD. Regression analysis estimated that additional costs attributable to advanced PD was USD3,416 (p = 0.000). Multimorbidity was highly prevalent, and 96% of PD patients had at least one other chronic condition. Conclusions: In the context of high judicialization, patients suffering from PD must increasingly use the judicial system to access treatment. To promote more equitable and efficient access benefit packages, developing countries must consider more thoroughly the needs of these patients.
Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Parkinson Disease/economics , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Colombia , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Parkinson Disease/therapyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Interstate variations in Medicaid reimbursements can be significant, and patients who live in states with low Medicaid reimbursements tend to have worse access to care. This analysis describes the extent of variations in Medicaid reimbursements for radiation oncology services across the United States. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Current Procedural Terminology codes billed for a course of whole breast radiation were identified for this study. Publicly available fee schedules were queried for all 50 states and Washington, DC, to determine the reimbursement for each service and the total reimbursement for the entire episode of care. The degree of interstate payment variation was quantified by computing the range, mean, standard deviation, and coefficient of variation. The cost of care for the entire episode of treatment was compared to the publicly available Kaiser Family Foundation (KFF) Medicaid-to-Medicare fee index to determine if the pattern of payment variation in medical services generally is predictive of the variation seen in radiation oncology specifically. RESULTS: Data were available for 48 states and Washington, DC. The total episode reimbursement (excluding image guidance for respiratory tracking) varied from $2945 to $15,218 (mean, $7233; standard deviation, $2248 or 31%). The correlation coefficient of the KFF index to the calculated entire episode of care for each state was 0.55. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variability in coverage and payments rates for radiation oncology services under Medicaid, and these variations track modestly with broader medical fees based on the KFF index. These variations may have implications for access to radiation oncology services that warrant further study.
Subject(s)
Fee Schedules/economics , Medicaid/economics , Radiation Oncology/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Unilateral Breast Neoplasms/economics , Clinical Coding/economics , Episode of Care , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Organ Motion , Radiation Dose Hypofractionation , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/standards , Respiration , Unilateral Breast Neoplasms/radiotherapy , United StatesABSTRACT
Much research has focused on differences in hospital prices paid by private (commercial) versus public (Medicare and Medicaid) health insurers. Far less is known about price differences across commercial payers-health maintenance organizations (HMOs) or preferred provider organizations (PPOs) versus other payers, such as casualty (automobile), workers' compensation, and travel insurers. We found that other insurers had far less negotiating power with hospitals than commercial HMO/PPO insurers did. In the period 2010-16, the median price paid by HMO/PPO insurers for hospital services in Florida increased from 1.9 times to 2.5 times the Medicare price, respectively, while the median price paid by other insurers increased from 2.8 times to 3.8 times the Medicare price. Commercial HMO/PPO insurers' prices were similar across major hospital systems, regardless of ownership, while other insurers' prices differed substantially across systems. In 2016 the twenty hospitals with the highest prices (7.8-14.1 times the Medicare rate) for other insurers in Florida were all affiliated with the Hospital Corporation of America. These hospitals generated 24 percent of their commercial net revenue (median) from other payers, despite treating a relatively small proportion of patients covered by these payers. Protecting patients with other insurance from high hospital prices requires efforts by policy makers, hospitals, and insurers.
Subject(s)
Commerce/economics , Economic Competition/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Carriers/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Commerce/statistics & numerical data , Florida , Health Expenditures , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Insurance Carriers/trends , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Private Sector/economics , Workers' Compensation/economicsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: As US healthcare spending increases, insurers are focusing attention on decreasing potentially avoidable specialist care. Little recent research has assessed whether the design of modern health maintenance organization (HMO) insurance is associated with lower utilization of outpatient specialty care versus less restrictive preferred provider organization (PPO) plans. STUDY DESIGN: Observational study of Massachusetts residents aged 21 to 64 years with any HMO or PPO insurance coverage from 2010 to 2013. METHODS: We examined rates and patterns of primary care visits, new specialist visits, and specialist spending among HMO versus PPO enrollees. We estimated multivariable regression models for each outcome, adjusting for patient and insurance characteristics. RESULTS: From 2010 to 2013, 546,397 and 295,427 individuals had continuous HMO or PPO coverage, respectively. HMO patients had fewer annual new specialist visits per member versus PPO patients (unadjusted, 0.37 vs 0.43), a difference after adjustment of 0.05 annual visits, or a 12% relative decrease among HMO members (P <.001). These visits were more likely to be with a specialist in the same health system as the patient's primary care physician (44.9% vs 40.7%; adjusted difference, 2.8 percentage points; P <.001). Mean annual spending on new specialist visits and subsequent follow-up per member was lower in HMO versus PPO patients (unadjusted, $104.10 vs $128.10), translating to 12% lower annual spending (adjusted difference, -$16.26; P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Having HMO insurance was associated with lower rates of new specialist visits and lower spending on specialist visits, and these visits were less likely to occur across multiple health systems. The impact of this change on overall spending and clinical outcomes remains unknown.
Subject(s)
Gatekeeping/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Preferred Provider Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Specialization/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Ambulatory Care/economics , Ambulatory Care/statistics & numerical data , Female , Gatekeeping/economics , Health Care Reform , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Male , Massachusetts , Middle Aged , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Specialization/economics , United States , Young AdultABSTRACT
Preventive visit rates are low among older adults in the United States. We evaluated changes in preventive visit utilization with Medicare's introduction of Annual Wellness Visits (AWVs) in 2011. We further assessed how coverage expansion differentially affected older adults who were previously underutilizing the service. The study included Medicare beneficiaries aged 65 to 85 from a mixed-payer multispecialty outpatient healthcare organization in northern California between 2007 and 2016. Data from the electronic health records were used, and the unit of analysis was patient-year (Nâ¯=â¯456,281). Multivariable logistic regression models were used to assess determinants of "any preventive visit" use. Prior to the AWV coverage (2007-2010), Medicare beneficiaries who were older, with serious chronic conditions, and with a fee-for-services (FFS) plan underutilized preventive visits such that odds ratio (OR) for age groups (vs. age 65-69) ranges from 0.826 (age 70-74) to 0.522 (age 80-85); for Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (vs. 0 CCI) ranges from 0.77 (1 CCI) to 0.65 (≥2 CCI); and for FFS (vs. HMO) is 0.236. With the Medicare coverage (2011-2016), the age-based gap reduced substantially, but the difference persisted, e.g., OR for age 80-85 (vs. 65-69) is 0.628, and FFS (vs. HMO) beneficiaries still have far lower odds of using a preventive visit (ORâ¯=â¯0.278). The gap based on comorbidity was not reduced. Medicare's coverage expansion facilitated the use of preventive visit particularly for older adults with more advanced age or with FFS, thereby reducing disparities in preventive visit use.
Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/economics , Preventive Health Services/economics , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , California , Comorbidity , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Services Accessibility , Humans , Male , Preventive Health Services/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Issue: Medicare Advantage (MA) enrollment has grown significantly since 2009, despite legislation that reduced what Medicare pays these plans to provide care to enrollees. MA payments, on average, now approach parity with costs in traditional Medicare. Goal: Examine changes in per enrollee costs between 2009 and 2014 to better understand how MA plans have continued to thrive even as payments decreased. Methods: Analysis of Medicare data on MA plan bids, net of rebates. Findings: While spending per beneficiary in traditional Medicare rose 5.0 percent between 2009 and 2014, MA payment benchmarks rose 1.5 percent and payment to plans decreased by 0.7 percent. Plans' expected per enrollee costs grew 2.6 percent. Plans where payment rates decreased generally had slower growth in their expected costs. HMOs, which saw their payments decline the most, had the slowest expected cost growth. Conclusions: In general, MA plans responded to lower payment by containing costs. By preserving most of the margin between Medicare payments and their bids in the form of rebates, they could continue to offer additional benefits to attract enrollees. The magnitude of this response varied by geographic area and plan type. Despite this slower growth in expected per enrollee costs, greater efficiencies by MA plans may still be achievable.
Subject(s)
Medicare Part C/economics , Medicare/economics , Benchmarking , Cost Control , Forecasting , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/trends , Humans , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/trends , Medicare Part C/statistics & numerical data , Medicare Part C/trends , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Preferred Provider Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Preferred Provider Organizations/trends , United StatesABSTRACT
Health plans use selective physician networks to control costs while improving quality. However, narrow (limited) networks raise concerns about reduced access to and continuity of care. In the period 2010-15, the proportion of Medicaid managed care plans in fourteen states with narrow primary care physician networks-that is, the plans that employed 30 percent or less of those physicians in their market-declined from a peak of 42 percent in 2011 to 27 percent in 2015. On average, plans experienced a 12 percent annual turnover rate, with 34 percent of primary care physicians exiting within five years. Turnover was 3 percentage points higher in plans with narrow networks after one year, and 20 percentage points higher after five years, compared to turnover in plans with non-narrow networks. These findings suggest that efforts to maintain adequate physician networks must monitor not only the breadth of the networks, but also the continuity within them.
Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/economics , Health Expenditures , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Medicaid/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Chronic Disease , Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Cost Control , Databases, Factual , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Managed Care Programs/economics , Managed Care Programs/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/organization & administration , Physicians/supply & distribution , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
The architects of Medical Episode Spending Allowance (MESA) benefits are radically reframing coverage as allowances for episodes of care and have a plan for engaging members in making better choices. MESA could catch on quickly, particularly with plan sponsors who have seen consumer-directed plan designs work against them.
Subject(s)
Deductibles and Coinsurance/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Humans , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine changes in children's albuterol use and out-of-pocket (OOP) costs in response to increased copayments after the Food and Drug Administration banned inhalers with chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) propellants. SETTING: Four health maintenance organizations (HMOs), two that increased copayments for albuterol inhalers that went from generic CFC-containing to branded CFC-free versions, and two that retained generic copayments for CFC-free inhalers (controls). We included children with asthma aged 4-17 years with commercial coverage from 2007 to 2010. DESIGN: Interrupted time series with comparison series. DATA: We obtained enrollee and plan characteristics from enrollment files, and utilization data from pharmacy and medical claims; OOP expenditures were extracted from pharmacy claims for two HMOs with cost data available. FINDINGS: There were no significant differences in albuterol use between the group with increased cost-sharing and controls with respect to changes after the policy change. There was a postpolicy increase of $6.11 OOP per month per child using albuterol among those with increased cost-sharing versus $0.36 in controls; the difference between groups was significant (p < .01). CONCLUSIONS: Increased copayments for brand-name CFC-free albuterol after the CFC ban did not lead to a decrease in children's albuterol use, but it led to a modest increase in OOP costs.
Subject(s)
Albuterol/economics , Asthma/drug therapy , Chlorofluorocarbons , Cost Sharing/statistics & numerical data , Nebulizers and Vaporizers/economics , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Interrupted Time Series Analysis , Male , SoilABSTRACT
Various health insurance benefit designs based on value-based purchasing have been promoted to steer patients to high-value providers, but little is known about the designs' relative effectiveness and underlying mechanisms. We compared the impact of two designs implemented by the California Public Employees' Retirement System on inpatient hospital total hip or knee replacement: a reference-based pricing design for preferred provider organizations (PPOs) and a centers-of-excellence design for health maintenance organizations (HMOs). Payment and utilization data for the procedures in the period 2008-13 were evaluated using pre-post and quasi-experimental designs at the system and health plan levels, adjusting for demographic characteristics, case-mix, and other confounders. We found that both designs prompted higher use of designated low-price high-quality facilities and reduced average replacement expenses per member at the plan and system levels. However, the designs used different routes: The reference-based pricing design reduced average replacement payments per case in PPOs by 26.7 percent in the first year, compared to HMOs, but did not lower PPO members' utilization rates. In contrast, the centers-of-excellence design lowered HMO members' utilization rates by 29.2 percent in the first year, compared to PPOs, but did not reduce HMO average replacement payments per case. The reference-based pricing design appears more suitable for reducing price variation, and the centers-of-excellence design for addressing variation in use.
Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Insurance Benefits/statistics & numerical data , Preferred Provider Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/economics , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/economics , California , Costs and Cost Analysis/economics , Female , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/economics , Health Benefit Plans, Employee/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/trends , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Preferred Provider Organizations/economicsABSTRACT
In a recently published IJHPR article, Cohen and Horev ask whether an individual who holds rightful governmental power is able to effectively "challenge the equilibrium" in ways that might "clash with the goals" of an influential group". This question is raised within the context of a shift in governmental policy that imposed the potential for cost management by HMOs acting as financial intermediaries for pediatric dental care in an effort to provide Israeli children better access to affordable dental care. The influential group referred to consists of Israel's private dentists and the individual seeking to challenge the equilibrium was an Israeli Minister of Health whom the authors consider to be a policy entrepreneur.The Israeli health care system is similar to that of the United States in that private benefit plans and self-pay financing dominate in dental care. This is in contrast to the substantial role of government in the financing and regulation of medical care in both countries (with Israel having universal coverage financed by government and the US having government financing the care of the elderly and the poor as well as providing subsidies through the tax system for the care of most other Americans).Efforts to expand governmental involvement in dental care in both countries have either been opposed by organized dentistry or have suffered from ineffective advocacy for increased public investment in dental care.In the U.S., philanthropic foundations have acted as or have supported health policy entrepreneurs. The recent movement to introduce the dental therapist, a type of allied dental professional trained to provide a narrow set of commonly-needed procedures, to the U.S. is discussed as an example of a successful challenge to the equilibrium by groups supported by these foundations. This is a somewhat different, and complementary, model of policy entrepreneurship from the individual policy entrepreneur highlighted in the Cohen-Horev paper.The political traction gained to change the equilibrium favored by organized dentistry - in both Israel and the U.S. - may reflect aspirations for care that is more accessible, patient-centered, accountable and equitable. Evolving aspirations may lead to policy changes to systematize the disparate, disaggregated dental care delivery system in both counties. A change in payment incentives to provide more value is being explored for medical care, and its expansion to dental care can be anticipated to be among the policies considered in the future.
Subject(s)
Entrepreneurship/trends , Financing, Government/methods , Health Policy/trends , Pediatric Dentistry/economics , Cost Control/methods , Health Care Reform/methods , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Israel , Pediatric Dentistry/trendsABSTRACT
ISSUE: Privately insured consumers expect that if they pay premiums and use in-network providers, their insurer will cover the cost of medically necessary care beyond their cost-sharing. However, when obtaining care at emergency departments and in-network hospitals, patients treated by an out-of-network provider may receive an unexpected "balance bill" for an amount beyond what the insurer paid. With no explicit federal protections against balance billing, some states have stepped in to protect consumers from this costly and confusing practice. GOAL: To better understand the scope of state laws to protect consumers from balance billing. METHODS: Analysis of laws in all 50 states and the District of Columbia and interviews with officials in eight states. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: Most states do not have laws that directly protect consumers from balance billing by an out-of-network provider for care delivered in an emergency department or in-network hospital. Of the 21 states offering protections, only six have a comprehensive approach to safeguarding consumers in both settings, and gaps remain even in these states. Because a federal policy solution might prove difficult, states may be better positioned in the short term to protect consumers.
Subject(s)
Accounts Payable and Receivable , Consumer Advocacy/economics , Consumer Advocacy/legislation & jurisprudence , Deductibles and Coinsurance/economics , Deductibles and Coinsurance/legislation & jurisprudence , Fees and Charges/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medical Services/economics , Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Preferred Provider Organizations/legislation & jurisprudence , State Government , United StatesABSTRACT
Medicare Advantage (MA) has grown rapidly since the Affordable Care Act; nearly one-third of Medicare beneficiaries now choose MA. An assessment of the comparative value of the 2 options is confounded by an apparent selection bias favoring MA, as reflected in mortality differences. Previous assessments have been hampered by lack of access to claims diagnosis data for the MA population. An indirect comparison of mortality as an outcome variable was conducted by modeling mortality on a traditional fee-for-service (FFS) Medicare data set, applying the model to an MA data set, and then evaluating the ratio of actual-to-predicted mortality in the MA data set. The mortality model adjusted for clinical conditions and demographic factors. Model development considered the effect of potentially greater coding intensity in the MA population. Further analysis calculated ratios for subpopulations. Predicted, risk-adjusted mortality was lower in the MA population than in FFS Medicare. However, the ratio of actual-to-predicted mortality (0.80) suggested that the individuals in the MA data set were less likely to die than would be predicted had those individuals been enrolled in FFS Medicare. Differences between actual and predicted mortality were particularly pronounced in low income (dual eligibility), nonwhite race, high morbidity, and Health Maintenance Organization (HMO) subgroups. After controlling for baseline clinical risk as represented by claims diagnosis data, mortality differences favoring MA over FFS Medicare persisted, particularly in vulnerable subgroups and HMO plans. These findings suggest that differences in morbidity do not fully explain differences in mortality between the 2 programs.
Subject(s)
Insurance Claim Review/statistics & numerical data , Medicare Part C/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Mortality/ethnology , Risk Adjustment , Fee-for-Service Plans/statistics & numerical data , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Insurance Claim Review/economics , Models, Statistical , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To compare home health utilization and clinical outcomes between Medicare beneficiaries in the fee-for-service (FFS) and Medicare Advantage (MA) programs, and to compare regional variation. STUDY DESIGN: We used the 2010 and 2011 Outcome and Assessment Information Set to identify all home health episodes begun in 2010 and to measure 7 clinical home health outcomes that are defined by CMS for public reporting. METHODS: We modeled the probability of home health use, the duration of home health episodes, and each clinical outcome measure as a function of MA versus FFS enrollment and model-specific risk adjustors. Empirical Bayes predictions from generalized linear mixed models were aggregated by hospital referral region (HRR) to create standardized regional measures of home health utilization and mean episode duration. RESULTS: We identified 30,837,130 FFS and 10,594,658 MA beneficiaries (excluding those dually eligible for Medicaid). After adjusting for demographic and clinical patient characteristics, the odds of receiving home health among FFS enrollees were 1.83 times those of MA (95% CI, 1.82-1.84). Adjusted home health duration was 34% longer for FFS (95% CI, 32%-34%). Outcomes differences were small in magnitude and inconsistent across measures. Regional variations in use and duration were substantial for both FFS and MA enrollees. Within HRRs, correlations between FFS and MA utilization rates and between FFS and MA episode durations were 0.51 and 0.94, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: MA beneficiaries use less home health than their FFS counterparts, but regional factors affect utilization, independent of insurance status.
Subject(s)
Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Medicaid/economics , Medicare Part C/economics , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Quality Indicators, Health Care , Aged , Fee-for-Service Plans/economics , Female , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Health Maintenance Organizations/statistics & numerical data , Home Care Services/economics , Humans , Logistic Models , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare Part C/statistics & numerical data , Odds Ratio , Risk Adjustment , United StatesABSTRACT
The new health insurance exchanges are the core of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) insurance reforms, but insurance markets beyond the exchanges also are affected by the reforms. This issue brief compares the markets for individual coverage on and off of the exchanges, using insurers' most recent projections for ACA-compliant policies. In 2016, insurers expect that less than one-fifth of ACA-compliant coverage will be sold outside of the exchanges. Insurers that sell mostly through exchanges devote a greater portion of their premium dollars to medical care than do insurers selling only off of the exchanges, because exchange insurers project lower administrative costs and lower profit margins. Premium increases on exchange plans are less than those for off-exchange plans, in large part because exchange enrollment is projected to shift to closed-network plans. Finally, initial concerns that insurers might seek to segregate higher-risk subscribers on the exchanges have not been realized.
Subject(s)
Health Insurance Exchanges/economics , Insurance, Health/economics , Value-Based Purchasing/economics , Health Insurance Exchanges/trends , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Humans , Insurance Selection Bias , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act , Preferred Provider Organizations/economics , Private Sector , Risk , United StatesABSTRACT
Recent concerted efforts have sought to shift provider payment away from fee-for-service and toward risk-based alternatives. Despite these efforts, fee-for-service not only remains the dominant payment method but has continued to grow, with nearly 95 percent of all physician office visits in 2013 reimbursed in this fashion.
Subject(s)
Fee-for-Service Plans , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Office Visits/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Primary Health Care/economics , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Male , Needs Assessment , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reimbursement Mechanisms/trends , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Reports suggest a trend for physician practices to change ownership from physicians to hospitals. It remains unclear how this change affects quality of patient care. We report the effect of a change to hospital ownership on the use of care management processes (CMPs) and health information technology (IT) among practices in the United States. STUDY DESIGN: Trend analyses of 3 large national surveys of physician practices. METHODS: We included 2 cohorts of practices: large practices with 20 or more physicians and small/medium practices with fewer than 20 physicians. The main outcomes were the changes in CMP and health IT indices among practices that were acquired by hospitals. We used multivariate logistic regression to assess these changes. RESULTS: Large practices acquired by hospitals had larger increases in their CMP index than those that remained physician-owned (11.0-point increase vs 7.0-point decrease; adjusted P = .03). Small/medium practices acquired by hospitals had smaller but significantly higher increases in their CMP score (3.8 points vs 2.6 points; adjusted P = .04). Among all practices, there were no significant differences in the change of the health IT index. CONCLUSIONS: We found a significant increase in the use of CMPs among practices that were acquired by hospitals and no difference in health IT use. These findings suggest that a trend for hospitals to own physician practices may have a positive effect on chronic disease management and quality of care.
Subject(s)
Health Expenditures/trends , Health Maintenance Organizations/economics , Ownership/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/economics , Economics, Hospital , Female , Group Practice/economics , Health Care Surveys , Health Maintenance Organizations/trends , Humans , Male , Ownership/economics , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of a policy change for older foster care youth from a fee-for-service (FFS) Medicaid program to health maintenance organization (HMO) providers on the timeliness of first well-child visits (health care physicals). METHODS: A three-year retrospective study using linked administrative data collected by the Michigan Departments of Human Services and Community Health of 1,657 youth, ages 10-20 years, who were in foster care during the 2009-2012 study period was used to examine the odds of receiving a timely well-child visit within the recommended 30-day time frame controlling for race, age, days from foster care entry to Medicaid enrollment, and number of foster care placements. RESULTS: Youth entering foster care during the HMO period were more likely to receive a timely well-child visit than those in the FFS period (odds ratio, 2.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.84-3.29; p < .0001) and days to the first visit decreased from a median of 62 days for those who entered foster care during the FFS period to 29 days for the HMO period. Among the other factors examined, more than 14 days to Medicaid enrollment, being non-Hispanic black and having five or more placements were negatively associated with receipt of a timely first well-child visit. CONCLUSIONS: Those youth who entered foster care during the HMO period had significantly greater odds of receiving a timely first well-child visit; however, disparities in access to preventive health care remain a concern for minority foster care youth, those who experience delayed Medicaid enrollment and those who experienced multiple placements.