ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Lung cancer remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. It is the third cause of death among patients with cancer in Puerto Rico (PR) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most prevalent. This study aims to describe the first-line treatment (1LT) and health care resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with NSCLC in PR. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using the PR Central Cancer Registry Health Insurance Linkage Database to describe patients with NSCLC from 2012 to 2016. It describes sociodemographic and clinical characteristics on the basis of stage and histology and includes 1LT patterns and HCRU. RESULTS: A total of 1,011 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most were male (57.1%), married (54.1%), and had no comorbidities (55.8%). A significant proportion of patients (71.1%) were diagnosed at stages III and IV, with nonsquamous cell carcinoma being the most prevalent histology group (75.9%). About 61.7% received systemic therapy, 36.7% received radiotherapy, and 21.9% underwent surgery. Platinum (Pt)-based combinations were the most common 1LT (82.9%). On average, patients had 4.7 emergency room visits, nearly six hospitalizations, and 22.4 outpatient visits annually. The mean frequencies of positron emission tomography, ultrasounds, computerized tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging were 0.95, 0.11, 4.88, and 0.91, respectively. CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this study provides the first description of 1LT patterns, HCRU, and sociodemographic information among patients with NSCLC in PR. A significant number of patients were diagnosed at stage III or higher and received Pt-based systemic therapy as their 1LT. More research is required to investigate treatment patterns beyond the 1LT and to gain a comprehensive understanding of optimal care interventions and factors associated with early NSCLC diagnosis.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung , Delivery of Health Care , Health Resources , Lung Neoplasms , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/therapy , Puerto Rico , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Delivery of Health Care/standards , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Cohort Studies , Sociodemographic Factors , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To examine resource and service use after discharge among infants born extraordinarily preterm in California who attended high-risk infant follow-up (HRIF) clinic by 12 months corrected age. STUDY DESIGN: We included infants born 2010-2017 between 22 + 0/7 and 25 + 6/7 weeks' gestational age in the California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative and California Perinatal Quality Care Collaborative-California Children's Services HRIF databases. We evaluated rates of hospitalization, surgeries, medications, equipment, medical service and special service use, and referrals. We examined factors associated with receiving ≥ 2 medical services, and ≥ 1 special service. RESULTS: A total of 3941 of 5284 infants received a HRIF visit by 12 months corrected age. Infants born at earlier gestational ages used more medications, equipment, medical services, and special services and had higher rates of referral to medical and special services at the first HRIF visit. Infants with major morbidity, surgery, caregiver concerns, and mothers with more years of education had higher odds of receiving ≥ 2 medical services. Infants with Black maternal race, younger maternal age, female sex, and discharge from lower level neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) had lower odds of receiving ≥ 2 medical services. Infants with more educated mothers, multiple gestation, major morbidity, surgery, caregiver concerns, and discharge from lower level NICUs had increased odds of receiving a special service. CONCLUSIONS: Infants born extraordinarily preterm have substantial resource use after discharge. High resource utilization was associated with maternal/sociodemographic factors and expected clinical factors. Early functional and service use information is valuable to parents and underscores the need for NICU providers to appropriately prepare and refer families.
Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Patient Discharge , Humans , California , Infant, Newborn , Female , Male , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Infant , Infant, Extremely Premature , Aftercare/statistics & numerical data , Follow-Up Studies , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To compare estimated healthcare resources needed to care for 22 through 24 weeks' gestation infants. STUDY DESIGN: This multicenter, retrospective cohort study included 1505 live in-born and out-born infants 22 through 24 weeks' gestational age at delivery from 6 pediatric tertiary care hospitals from 2011 through 2020. Median neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) length of stay (LOS) for each gestational age was used as a proxy for hospital resource utilization, and the number of comorbidities and medical technology use for each infant were used as estimates of future medical care needs. Data were analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis with Nemenyi's posthoc test and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Of the identified newborns, 22-week infants had shorter median LOS than their 23- and 24-week counterparts due to low survival rates. There was no significant difference in LOS for surviving 22-week infants compared with surviving 23-week infants. Surviving 22-week infants had similar proportions of comorbidities and medical technology use as 23-week infants. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with 23- and 24-week infants, 22-week infants did not use a disproportionate amount of hospital resources. Twenty-two-week infants should not be excluded from resuscitation based on concern for increased hospital care and medical technology requirements. As overall resuscitation efforts and survival rates increase for 22-week infants, future research will be needed to assess the evolution of these results.
Subject(s)
Gestational Age , Health Resources , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Length of Stay , Resuscitation , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies , Female , Male , Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Extremely PrematureABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe the prevalence of Owlet Smart Sock (OSS) use in infants with supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) and associated demographic and clinical characteristics of users and to analyze the association of OSS use on medical resource use and clinical outcomes from emergency department (ED) encounters for SVT. STUDY DESIGN: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study of infants with confirmed SVT from 2015 to 2022. OSS users and nonusers were compared across clinical and demographic parameters. Medical resource use (phone calls, office visits, ED visits) and outcomes (need for intensive care, length of stay, echocardiographic function, clinical appearance) were compared between OSS users and nonusers. RESULTS: Of 133 infants with SVT, OSS was used by 31 of 133 (23%), purchased before SVT diagnosis in 5 in 31 (16%) of users. No demographic difference was found between OSS users and nonusers. OSS users had more phone notes than nonusers, (P = .002) and more ED visits (P = .03), but the number of office visits and medication adjustments did not differ. During ED presentation, OSS users had better preserved left ventricular ejection fraction on echocardiogram (P = .04) and lower length of hospital stay by a mean 1.7 days (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: OSS is used by a portion of infants with SVT. It is associated with more frequent phone calls and ED visits but lower length of stay and better-preserved cardiac function upon presentation.
Subject(s)
Tachycardia, Supraventricular , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/epidemiology , Tachycardia, Supraventricular/drug therapy , Male , Female , Infant , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Infant, Newborn , Echocardiography , Health Resources/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
As doenças de notificação obrigatória em bovinos podem gerar impactos sociais e econômicos significativos na cadeia pecuária brasileira, além de consequências negativas no mercado internacional devido a embargos sanitários. Para auxiliar no entendimento de como um sistema de vigilância epidemiológica com mais recursos pode gerar mais credibilidade para o país, foram realizadas análises de correlação entre a notificação de doenças e a estrutura veterinária disponível nos Órgãos Executores de Sanidade Agropecuária (OESAs), a partir dos dados contidos no Sistema Nacional de Informação Zoossanitária (SIZ), entre os anos de 2017 e 2019. Com base nos dados do serviço veterinário, foram produzidos o Índice de Estrutura Física Oficial (IEFO) e o Índice de Recursos Humanos do Serviço Oficial (IRHSO). Foi realizada análise de correlação entre a notificação de doenças de bovinos com a capacidade de estrutura física e recursos humanos de vigilância epidemiológica disponíveis no Serviço Veterinário brasileiro. Os estados AP, RR e SC foram os que mais notificaram brucelose e tuberculose no período e estão entre os melhores índices de estrutura e recursos humanos do país. A análise dos índices mostrou que a raiva não possui correlação significativa com estrutura e recursos humanos do serviço, entretanto, brucelose e tuberculose possuem correlação positiva com estrutura veterinária oficial disponível para a vigilância em bovinos. Portanto, melhorias na estrutura podem refletir no incremento dos índices de notificação das doenças de bovinos, assim como na qualidade de suas informações.
Notifiable diseases in cattle can generate significant social and economic impacts on the Brazilian livestock chain, in addition to impacts on the international market due to sanitary embargoes. To help understand how an epidemiological surveillance system with more resources can generate more credibility for the country, correlation analyzes were carried out between the notification of diseases and the veterinary structure available in the Executing Bodies of Agricultural Health (OESAs), based on the data contained in the National System of Zoosanitary Information (SIZ), between the years 2017 to 2019. Based on public data from the veterinary service, the Official Physical Structure Index (IEFO) and the Official Service Human Resources Index (IRHSO) were produced. Correlation analysis was performed between the notification of bovine diseases with the capacity of physical structure and human resources for epidemiological surveillance available in the Brazilian Veterinary Service. AP, RR and SC were the states that most notified brucellosis and tuberculosis in the period and are among the best indices of structure and human resources in the country. The analysis of correlation indices showed that the rabies disease does not have a significant correlation with the structure and the human resources of the service, however, brucellosis and tuberculosis does have a positive correlation with the official veterinary structure available for surveillance in cattle. Therefore, Improvements in the structure can reflect in the increase of the notification rates, as well as in the quality of its information.
Subject(s)
Animals , Cattle , Structure of Services , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiological Monitoring/veterinary , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Rabies/epidemiology , Tuberculosis, Bovine/epidemiology , Brucellosis, Bovine/epidemiologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Socioeconomic factors may impact healthcare resource use and health-related quality of life, but their association with postcritical illness outcomes is unknown. This study examines the associations between socioeconomic status, resource use, and health-related quality of life in a cohort of children recovering from acute respiratory failure. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data from the Randomized Evaluation of Sedation Titration for Respiratory Failure clinical trial. SETTING: Thirty-one PICUs. PATIENTS: Children with acute respiratory failure enrolled whose parent/guardians consented for follow-up. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Resource use included in-home care, number of healthcare providers, prescribed medications, home medical equipment, emergency department visits, and hospital readmission. Socioeconomic status was estimated by matching residential address to census tract-based median income. Health-related quality of life was measured using age-based parent-report instruments. Resource use interviews with matched census tract data (n = 958) and health-related quality of life questionnaires (n = 750/958) were assessed. Compared with high-income children, low-income children received care from fewer types of healthcare providers (ß = -0.4; p = 0.004), used less newly prescribed medical equipment (odds ratio = 0.4; p < 0.001), and had more emergency department visits (43% vs 33%; p = 0.04). In the youngest cohort (< 2 yr old), low-income children had lower quality of life scores from physical ability (-8.6 points; p = 0.01) and bodily pain/discomfort (+8.2 points; p < 0.05). In addition, health-related quality of life was lower in those who had more healthcare providers and prescribed medications. In older children, health-related quality of life was lower if they had prescribed medications, emergency department visits, or hospital readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Children recovering from acute respiratory failure have ongoing healthcare resource use. Yet, lower income children use less in-home and outpatient services and use more hospital resources. Continued follow-up care, especially in lower income children, may help identify those in need of ongoing healthcare resources and those at-risk for decreased health-related quality of life.
Subject(s)
Health Resources/supply & distribution , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Quality of Life/psychology , Social Class , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Health Resources/standards , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/organization & administration , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Male , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Purpose To evaluate the cost-utility of the iStent inject® for the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) within the Brazilian Unified Health System (SUS). Methods A Markov model was developed, in which the effectiveness outcome measure was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER: R$ / QALY quality-adjusted life-year). Direct medical costs were obtained from the SUS perspective. The base case comprised of a hypothetical cohort of patients with OAG using topical medication and being managed according to the Clinical Protocol and Therapeutic Guidelines (PCDT) and a real-world setting based on data from Datasus. The model's robustness through sensitivity analyses was tested. Results In the PCDT base case setting, the trabecular micro-bypass implant provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$7,996.66/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. In the real-world setting based on data from Datasus, the trabecular micro-bypass implant, provided gains of 0.47 QALYs and an ICER of R$4,485.68/QALY compared to treatment with topical medication. The results were robust to sensitivity analyses. Conclusion Incorporating iStent inject® to SUS provides an improvement in the patient's quality of life with an additional cost that warrants the benefit provided to patients. Results may be considered cost-effective compared to topical medication.
RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a relação custo-utilidade do iStent inject® para o tratamento do glaucoma de ângulo aberto leve a moderado no Sistema Único de Saúde. Métodos Foi desenvolvido um modelo de Markov, no qual a medida de resultado de efetividade foi a razão custo-efetividade incremental (razão de custo-efetividade incremental: R$/ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade). Os custos médicos diretos foram obtidos por meio da perspectiva do Sistema Único de Saúde. O caso base foi composto de uma coorte hipotética de pacientes com glaucoma de ângulo aberto em uso de medicação tópica tratados de acordo com o Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas e um cenário do mundo real baseado em dados do Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde. Foi testada a robustez do modelo por meio de análises de sensibilidade. Resultados No cenário base do Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas, o implante trabecular micro-bypass proporcionou ganhos de 0,47 ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade e razão de custo-efetividade incremental de R$7.996,66/ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade em relação ao tratamento com medicação tópica. No cenário real baseado em dados do Departamento de Informática do Sistema Único de Saúde, o implante trabecular proporcionou ganhos de 0,47 ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade e razão de custo-efetividade incremental de R$ 4.485,68/ano de vida ajustado pela qualidade em relação ao tratamento com medicação tópica. Os resultados foram robustos para análises de sensibilidade. Conclusão A incorporação do iStent inject® ao Sistema Único de Saúde proporciona melhora na qualidade de vida do paciente com um custo adicional que garante o benefício proporcionado a eles. Os resultados podem ser considerados custo-efetivos em comparação com a medicação tópica.
Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Unified Health System , Stents/economics , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/surgery , Glaucoma, Open-Angle/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Costs and Cost Analysis , Trabeculectomy/economics , Visual Fields/physiology , Markov Chains , Health Care Costs , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Intraocular Pressure/physiologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Considering clinical benefits of new combination therapies for metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (mRCC), this study aims to calculate the number needed to treat (NTT) and the cost of preventing an event (COPE) for pembrolizumab plus axitinib (P + A), and nivolumab plus ipilimumab (N + I) as first-line treatments, from the Brazilian private perspective. METHODS: Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) data for intermediate- and poor-risk groups were obtained from KEYNOTE-426 and CHECKMATE-214 trials for P + A and N + I, respectively, versus sunitinib as mRCC first-line treatment. RESULTS: Considering a 12-month time horizon, 6 patients should be treated with P + A to prevent one death with sunitinib use, resulting in a COPE of 3,773,865 BRL. Using N + I, NNT for 12-month OS rate was 13 compared to sunitinib, with a COPE of 6,357,965 BRL. Regarding PFS data, NNT was also 6 when comparing P + A versus sunitinib, with an estimated COPE of 3,773,865 BRL. Estimated NNT was 20 comparing N + I and sunitinib, resulting in a COPE of 10,172,744 BRL. Cost differences between two treatment options, reached more than 6 million BRL for PFS, and 2 million BRL for OS. CONCLUSION: At the 12-month landmark, P + A suggests better economic scenario versus N + I as first-line mRCC treatment option for intermediate- and poor-risk groups, through an indirect comparison using sunitinib as a common comparator.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/economics , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/economics , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/drug therapy , Kidney Neoplasms/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/economics , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Immunological/adverse effects , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Axitinib/economics , Axitinib/therapeutic use , Brazil , Carcinoma, Renal Cell/pathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Ipilimumab/economics , Ipilimumab/therapeutic use , Kidney Neoplasms/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Models, Economic , Nivolumab/economics , Nivolumab/therapeutic use , Progression-Free Survival , Severity of Illness Index , Sunitinib/economics , Sunitinib/therapeutic use , Young AdultABSTRACT
This review aims to identify information on epidemiological parameters and estimate the cost of moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA). A search for related literature was carried out in major databases. A consensus of local rheumatology experts was used to find the most realistic parameters, using a modified Delphi method. Direct medical costs were estimated, using information collected from the cost per unit database of the Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria de Argentina. Indirect costs were estimated using the human resources approach. Costs were expressed in US dollars (USD) as of November 2017. The reported prevalence of RA in Argentina was 0.94% (95%CI: 0.86 to 1.02), with an annual incidence rate of 19 per 100,000 people (95%CI: 17 to 20). The annual cost of disease-modifying drugs was 33,936.10 USD per patient. The cost attributed to serious infections was 2,474.6 USD. The cost of bilateral knee replacement per patient was $5,276.8 USD; and the cost for total hip replacement was $9,196.4. Both, the cost of hospitalization days per patient per year, and the indirect costs of RA increased as the disability score increased. This review reports useful information on epidemiological and cost parameters of moderate to severe RA, in the era of biological agents, in order to be useful for conducting economic evaluations regarding health in Argentina.
La presente revisión tiene como objetivo identificar información sobre parámetros epidemiológicos y estimar el costo de la artritis reumatoidea (AR) moderada a severa. Se llevó a cabo una búsqueda de la literatura en las principales bases de datos. Se recurrió a un consenso de expertos locales en reumatología para encontrar los parámetros más realistas, utilizando un método Delphi modificado. Se estimaron los costos médicos directos, utilizando información recopilada en la base de datos de costos unitarios del Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria de Argentina. Los costos indirectos se estimaron a través del enfoque del capital humano. Los costos se expresaron en dólares estadounidenses (USD) a noviembre de 2017. La prevalencia reportada de AR en Argentina fue 0,94% (IC95%: 0,86 a 1,02), con una tasa de incidencia anual de 19 cada 100 000 personas (IC95%: 17 a 20). El costo anual de las drogas modificadoras de la enfermedad fue de USD 33 936,10 por paciente. El costo atribuido a las infecciones serias fue de USD 2474,6. El costo del reemplazo bilateral de rodillas por paciente fue de USD 5276,8, y el del reemplazo total de cadera, de USD 9196,4. El costo por paciente por año de días de hospitalización y los costos indirectos de la AR se acrecentaron al aumentar el puntaje de discapacidad. La revisión reporta información útil acerca de parámetros epidemiológicos y de costos de la AR moderada a severa en la era de los agentes biológicos, con el fin de resultar de utilidad para la conducción de evaluaciones económicas de salud en Argentina.
Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Cost of Illness , Health Care Costs , Health Resources , Argentina/epidemiology , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/economics , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with increased cardiovascular (CV) risk. We compared health-related quality of life (HRQoL), healthcare resource utilization (HRU), and clinical outcomes of stable post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with and without DM. HYPOTHESIS: In post-MI patients, DM is associated with worse HRQoL, increased HRU, and worse clinical outcomes. METHODS: The prospective, observational long-term risk, clinical management, and healthcare Resource utilization of stable coronary artery disease study obtained data from 8968 patients aged ≥50 years 1 to 3 years post-MI (369 centers; 25 countries). Patients with ≥1 of the following risk factors were included: age ≥65 years, history of a second MI >1 year before enrollment, multivessel coronary artery disease, creatinine clearance ≥15 and <60 mL/min, and DM treated with medication. Self-reported health status was assessed at baseline, 1 and 2 years and converted to EQ-5D scores. The main outcome measures were baseline HRQoL and HRU during follow-up. RESULTS: DM at enrollment was 33% (2959 patients, 869 insulin treated). Mean baseline EQ-5D score (0.86 vs 0.82; P < .0001) was higher; mean number of hospitalizations (0.38 vs 0.50, P < .0001) and mean length of stay (LoS; 9.3 vs 11.5; P = .001) were lower in patients without vs with DM. All-cause death and the composite of CV death, MI, and stroke were significantly higher in DM patients, with adjusted 2-year rate ratios of 1.43 (P < .01) and 1.55 (P < .001), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Stable post-MI patients with DM (especially insulin treated) had poorer EQ-5D scores, higher hospitalization rates and LoS, and worse clinical outcomes vs those without DM. Strategies focusing specifically on this high-risk population should be developed to improve outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01866904 (https://clinicaltrials.gov).
Subject(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/psychology , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Status , Myocardial Infarction/psychology , Self Report , Aged , Diabetes Mellitus/economics , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Prognosis , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Risk Factors , Time FactorsABSTRACT
Introduction: Congenital heart disease represents a public health issue worldwide. Objective: To know the number of patients with heart disease treated in two public hospitals of the State of Jalisco, as well as the mortality and resources available to participating hospitals for the care of these patients in the period from 2015 to 2018; the information was requested to the -National Transparency Platform, and the database of pediatric cardiology services and pediatric cardiovascular surgery of the participating hospitals were also reviewed. Results: The second level hospital has human resources, but not the material to attend to these patients; so it is not possible to offer any type of palliative or corrective treatment. A total of 624 patients were evaluated, of which 92.2% corresponded to non-critical heart disease; overall mortality was 12% but in critical heart disease it was 79.5%. The third level hospital has human and material resources to care for these patients. During the study period, 289 operations were performed and the overall mortality was 20.4%. Conclusion: Congenital heart disease in the State of Jalisco is an important cause of mortality, with a high incidence and a very limited resolution capacity since the health services in the State of Jalisco for the care of these patients are insufficient and inadequate. It is essential to strengthen the health system for the care for these patients.
Introducción: Las cardiopatías congénitas representan un problema de salud pública a nivel mundial. Objetivo: Conocer la cantidad de pacientes cardiópatas atendidos en dos hospitales públicos del estado de Jalisco, así como la mortalidad y los recursos con que cuentan los hospitales participantes para la atención de estos pacientes en el período del 2015 al 2018. Se solicitó la información a la Plataforma Nacional de Transparencia y además se revisaron las bases de datos de los servicios de cardiología pediátrica y cirugía cardiovascular pediátrica de los hospitales participantes. Resultados: El hospital de segundo nivel cuenta con los recursos humanos, pero no con el material para atender a estos pacientes, por lo que no es posible ofrecer ningún tipo de tratamiento paliativo o correctivo (sólo se cierran algunos conductos arteriosos en la etapa neonatal). Se valoró a un total de 624 pacientes, de los cuales el 92.2% correspondió a cardiopatías no críticas; la mortalidad global fue del 12% pero en las cardiopatías críticas fue del 79.5%. El hospital de tercer nivel cuenta con recursos humanos y material para atender a estos pacientes; en el período de estudio se realizaron 289 operaciones y la mortalidad global fue del 20.4%. Conclusión: Las cardiopatías congénitas en el estado de Jalisco son una causa importante de mortalidad, con una incidencia elevada y una capacidad de resolución sumamente limitada, ya que los servicios de salud de Jalisco para la atención de estos pacientes son insuficientes e inadecuados. Es esencial fortalecer el sistema de salud para atender a estos pacientes.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Child, Preschool , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Heart Defects, Congenital/mortality , Hospitals, Public , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mexico , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Abstract Background: Valle del Cauca is the region with the fourth-highest number of COVID-19 cases in Colombia (>50,000 on September 7, 2020). Due to the lack of anti-COVID-19 therapies, decision-makers require timely and accurate data to estimate the incidence of disease and the availability of hospital resources to contain the pandemic. Methods: We adapted an existing model to the local context to forecast COVID-19 incidence and hospital resource use assuming different scenarios: (1) the implementation of quarantine from September 1st to October 15th (average daily growth rate of 2%); (2-3) partial restrictions (at 4% and 8% growth rates); and (4) no restrictions, assuming a 10% growth rate. Previous scenarios with predictions from June to August were also presented. We estimated the number of new cases, diagnostic tests required, and the number of available hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) beds (with and without ventilators) for each scenario. Results: We estimated 67,700 cases by October 15th when assuming the implementation of a quarantine, 80,400 and 101,500 cases when assuming partial restrictions at 4% and 8% infection rates, respectively, and 208,500 with no restrictions. According to different scenarios, the estimated demand for reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction tests ranged from 202,000 to 1,610,600 between September 1st and October 15th. The model predicted depletion of hospital and ICU beds by September 20th if all restrictions were to be lifted and the infection growth rate increased to 10%. Conclusion: Slowly lifting social distancing restrictions and reopening the economy is not expected to result in full resource depletion by October if the daily growth rate is maintained below 8%. Increasing the number of available beds provides a safeguard against slightly higher infection rates. Predictive models can be iteratively used to obtain nuanced predictions to aid decision-making
Resumen Introducción: Valle del Cauca es el departamento con el cuarto mayor número de casos de COVID-19 en Colombia (>50,000 en septiembre 7, 2020). Debido a la ausencia de tratamientos efectivos para COVID-19, los tomadores de decisiones requieren de acceso a información actualizada para estimar la incidencia de la enfermedad, y la disponibilidad de recursos hospitalarios para contener la pandemia. Métodos: Adaptamos un modelo existente al contexto local para estimar la incidencia de COVID-19, y la demanda de recursos hospitalarios en los próximos meses. Para ello, modelamos cuatro escenarios hipotéticos: (1) el gobierno local implementa una cuarentena desde el primero de septiembre hasta el 15 de octubre (asumiendo una tasa promedio de infecciones diarias del 2%); (2-3) se implementan restricciones parciales (tasas de infección del 4% y 8%); (4) se levantan todas las restricciones (tasa del 10%). Los mismos escenarios fueron previamente evaluados entre julio y agosto, y los resultados fueron resumidos. Estimamos el número de casos nuevos, el número de pruebas diagnósticas requeridas, y el numero de camas de hospital y de unidad de cuidados intensivos (con y sin ventilación) disponibles, para cada escenario. Resultados: El modelo estimó 67,700 casos a octubre 15 al asumir la implementación de una nueva cuarentena, 80,400 y 101,500 al asumir restricciones parciales al 4 y 8% de infecciones diarias, respectivamente, y 208,500 al asumir ninguna restricción. La demanda por pruebas diagnósticas (de reacción en cadena de la polimerasa) fue estimada entre 202,000 y 1,610,600 entre septiembre 1 y octubre 15, a través de los diferentes escenarios evaluados. El modelo estimó un agotamiento de camas de cuidados intensivos para septiembre 20 al asumir una tasa de infecciones del 10%. Conclusión: Se estima que el levantamiento paulatino de las restricciones de distanciamiento social y la reapertura de la economía no debería causar el agotamiento de recursos hospitalarios si la tasa de infección diaria se mantiene por debajo del 8%. Sin embargo, incrementar la disponibilidad de camas permitiría al sistema de salud ajustarse rápidamente a potenciales picos inesperados de infecciones nuevas. Los modelos de predicción deben ser utilizados de manera iterativa para depurar las predicciones epidemiológicas y para proveer a los tomadores de decisiones con información actualizada.
Subject(s)
Humans , Models, Statistical , Delivery of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19/therapy , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Colombia , COVID-19/epidemiology , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Hospital Bed Capacity/statistics & numerical data , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/economics , Cost of Illness , Health Expenditures/trends , Health Resources/trends , Pandemics/economics , Pneumonia, Viral/economics , State Medicine/economics , Betacoronavirus/isolation & purification , Brazil/epidemiology , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , Primary Health Care/economics , Primary Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Primary Health Care/trends , SARS-CoV-2 , State Medicine/statistics & numerical data , State Medicine/trends , Workforce/economics , Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Workforce/trendsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: There is little information of intensive care unit (ICU) performance when it's relocated to a totally new and equipped area. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the clinical performance and use of resources of a new respiratory-ICU (nRICU) in a large third-level care hospital. METHOD: Cross-sectional, comparative study using prospective data of patients admitted from July 17, 2017 to July 17, 2018. The Rapoport adjusted method was used to obtain the standardized clinical performance index (SCPI) and the standardized resource use index (SRUI). RESULTS: Out of 354 patients, those who were readmissions or remained hospitalized and those whose treatment was withheld or withdrawn where excluded from the analysis. In 301 patients, the observed survival at hospital discharge was 63% while the expected survival was 67.7%. Values of SCPI and SRUI were -1.03 and 0.05 respectively, placing results in coordinates within two standard deviations when plotted in the Rapoport chart. There was a statistically significant difference in survival when comparing the study period with outcomes obtained in the RICU before its relocation (63% vs. 55%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In its 1st year of operation, the nRICU had better clinical performance compared to the former RICU, with no change in the use of resources.
ANTECEDENTES: Existe poca información acerca del desempeño de una unidad de cuidados intensivos (UCI) cuando es reubicada en un área totalmente nueva y equipada. OBJETIVO: Analizar el rendimiento clínico y el uso de recursos de la nueva UCI respiratoria (UCIR) de un hospital grande de tercer nivel. MÉTODO: Estudio transversal, comparativo, con datos prospectivos de pacientes ingresados del 17 de julio de 2017 al 17 de julio de 2018. Se usa el método ajustado de Rapoport para obtener el índice de rendimiento clínico estandarizado (IRCE) y el índice de uso de recursos estandarizado (IRURE). RESULTADOS: De 354 pacientes fueron excluidos los reingresos, los pacientes aún hospitalizados y aquellos a quienes se limitó o retiró el tratamiento. En 301 pacientes la sobrevida hospitalaria fue del 63%, mientras que la sobrevida esperada fue del 67.7%. El IRCE fue −1.03 y el IRURE fue 0.05, situando el resultado en coordenadas dentro de dos desviaciones estándar en el gráfico de Rapoport. Hubo una diferencia estadísticamente significativa en la sobrevida comparando el periodo de estudio con resultados de la UCIR obtenidos antes de su reubicación (63 vs. 55%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONES: En su primer año de funcionamiento, la nueva UCIR tuvo mejor rendimiento clínico que la antigua, sin modificación en el uso de recursos.
Subject(s)
Hospital Design and Construction , Intensive Care Units/organization & administration , Adult , Aged , Critical Care/organization & administration , Cross-Sectional Studies , Diagnosis-Related Groups , Equipment and Supplies, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Design and Construction/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, General/organization & administration , Hospitals, General/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Mexico , Middle Aged , Tertiary Care Centers/organization & administration , Tertiary Care Centers/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , Work Performance , Young AdultABSTRACT
Abstract Introduction: Congenital heart disease represents a public health issue worldwide. Objective: To know the number of patients with heart disease treated in two public hospitals of the State of Jalisco, as well as the mortality and resources available to participating hospitals for the care of these patients in the period from 2015 to 2018; the information was requested to the National Transparency Platform, and the database of pediatric cardiology services and pediatric cardiovascular surgery of the participating hospitals were also reviewed. Results: The second level hospital has human resources, but not the material to attend to these patients; so it is not possible to offer any type of palliative or corrective treatment. A total of 624 patients were evaluated, of which 92.2% corresponded to non-critical heart disease; overall mortality was 12% but in critical heart disease it was 79.5%. The third level hospital has human and material resources to care for these patients. During the study period, 289 operations were performed and the overall mortality was 20.4%. Conclusion: Congenital heart disease in the State of Jalisco is an important cause of mortality, with a high incidence and a very limited resolution capacity since the health services in the State of Jalisco for the care of these patients are insufficient and inadequate. It is essential to strengthen the health system for the care for these patients.
Resumen Introducción: Las cardiopatías congénitas representan un problema de salud pública a nivel mundial. Objetivo: Conocer la cantidad de pacientes cardiópatas atendidos en dos hospitales públicos del estado de Jalisco, así como la mortalidad y los recursos con que cuentan los hospitales participantes para la atención de estos pacientes en el período del 2015 al 2018. Se solicitó la información a la Plataforma Nacional de Transparencia y además se revisaron las bases de datos de los servicios de cardiología pediátrica y cirugía cardiovascular pediátrica de los hospitales participantes. Resultados: El hospital de segundo nivel cuenta con los recursos humanos, pero no con el material para atender a estos pacientes, por lo que no es posible ofrecer ningún tipo de tratamiento paliativo o correctivo (sólo se cierran algunos conductos arteriosos en la etapa neonatal). Se valoró a un total de 624 pacientes, de los cuales el 92.2% correspondió a cardiopatías no críticas; la mortalidad global fue del 12% pero en las cardiopatías críticas fue del 79.5%. El hospital de tercer nivel cuenta con recursos humanos y material para atender a estos pacientes; en el período de estudio se realizaron 289 operaciones y la mortalidad global fue del 20.4%. Conclusión: Las cardiopatías congénitas en el estado de Jalisco son una causa importante de mortalidad, con una incidencia elevada y una capacidad de resolución sumamente limitada, ya que los servicios de salud de Jalisco para la atención de estos pacientes son insuficientes e inadecuados. Es esencial fortalecer el sistema de salud para atender a estos pacientes.
Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Prospective Studies , Heart Defects, Congenital/mortality , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Hospitals, Public , MexicoABSTRACT
Introduction: Congenital heart disease represents a public health issue worldwide. Objective: To know the number of patients with heart disease treated in two public hospitals of the State of Jalisco, as well as the mortality and resources available to participating hospitals for the care of these patients in the period from 2015 to 2018; the information was requested to the -National Transparency Platform, and the database of pediatric cardiology services and pediatric cardiovascular surgery of the participating hospitals were also reviewed. Results: The second level hospital has human resources, but not the material to attend to these patients; so it is not possible to offer any type of palliative or corrective treatment. A total of 624 patients were evaluated, of which 92.2% corresponded to non-critical heart disease; overall mortality was 12% but in critical heart disease it was 79.5%. The third level hospital has human and material resources to care for these patients. During the study period, 289 operations were performed and the overall mortality was 20.4%. Conclusion: Congenital heart disease in the State of Jalisco is an important cause of mortality, with a high incidence and a very limited resolution capacity since the health services in the State of Jalisco for the care of these patients are insufficient and inadequate. It is essential to strengthen the health system for the care for these patients.
Introducción: Las cardiopatías congénitas representan un problema de salud pública a nivel mundial. Objetivo: Conocer la cantidad de pacientes cardiópatas atendidos en dos hospitales públicos del estado de Jalisco, así como la mortalidad y los recursos con que cuentan los hospitales participantes para la atención de estos pacientes en el período del 2015 al 2018. Se solicitó la información a la Plataforma Nacional de Transparencia y además se revisaron las bases de datos de los servicios de cardiología pediátrica y cirugía cardiovascular pediátrica de los hospitales participantes. Resultados: El hospital de segundo nivel cuenta con los recursos humanos, pero no con el material para atender a estos pacientes, por lo que no es posible ofrecer ningún tipo de tratamiento paliativo o correctivo (sólo se cierran algunos conductos arteriosos en la etapa neonatal). Se valoró a un total de 624 pacientes, de los cuales el 92.2% correspondió a cardiopatías no críticas; la mortalidad global fue del 12% pero en las cardiopatías críticas fue del 79.5%. El hospital de tercer nivel cuenta con recursos humanos y material para atender a estos pacientes; en el período de estudio se realizaron 289 operaciones y la mortalidad global fue del 20.4%. Conclusión: Las cardiopatías congénitas en el estado de Jalisco son una causa importante de mortalidad, con una incidencia elevada y una capacidad de resolución sumamente limitada, ya que los servicios de salud de Jalisco para la atención de estos pacientes son insuficientes e inadecuados. Es esencial fortalecer el sistema de salud para atender a estos pacientes.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Heart Defects, Congenital/epidemiology , Hospitals, Public , Child, Preschool , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/mortality , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Mexico , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
Identifying the true prevalence of human T-cell lymphotropic virus, mostly type 1 (HTLV-1), and the number of patients with HTLV-1-associated diseases, in addition to introducing HTLV-1/2 serology during the prenatal of pregnant women and in individuals infected with other viruses that share transmission routes with HTLV-1, are actions that could help to recognize the importance of this virus by WHO and national health organizations, and to control its transmission/dissemination. As Brazil is endemic to HTLV and there is an increase in health care expenditure, but resources are limited, any strategy that could reduce the cost of HTLV screening is needed and welcomed. This study aimed to determine whether the strategy of pooling sera for HTLV antibody determination is feasible and reduces the costs. Two enzyme immunoassays (EIA Murex HTLV-I+II, Diasorin, UK, and Gold ELISA HTLV-1+2, REM Ind. Com. Ltda., SP, Brazil), and serum samples that resulted in different levels of HTLV-1/2 antibodies by EIA and of which a volume allowed assay validation were employed for analysis. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity and Cohen's Kappa value, as well as the accuracy and precision were analyzed. After validating the five-sample pool using the EIA Murex (Cohen's Kappa = 1.0), the technique was employed for individual cost comparison in 2,625 serum samples from populations at risk of HTLV infections (HBV, HCV, and HIV-infected individuals). The results from individual and pooled samples confirmed the diagnostic sensitivity (100%) and specificity (100%) of the pooling and a cost minimization varying from 60.7% to 73.6%. In conclusion, the results of this study suggest the use of pooling sera in sero-epidemiological surveillance studies and possibly in prenatal care screening programs in Brazil.
Subject(s)
HTLV-I Infections/diagnosis , HTLV-II Infections/diagnosis , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/economics , Human T-lymphotropic virus 1/immunology , Human T-lymphotropic virus 2/immunology , Mass Screening/economics , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , HumansABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adverse events from surgical care are a major cause of death and disability, particularly in low-and-middle-income countries. Metrics for quality of surgical care developed in high-income settings are resource-intensive and inappropriate in most lower resource settings. The purpose of this study was to apply and assess the feasibility of a new tool to measure surgical quality in resource-constrained settings. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study of surgical quality using a novel evidence-based tool for quality measurement in low-resource settings. The tool was adapted for use at a tertiary hospital in Amazonas, Brazil resulting in 14 metrics of quality of care. Nine metrics were collected prospectively during a 4-week period, while five were collected retrospectively from the hospital administrative data and operating room logbooks. RESULTS: 183 surgeries were observed, 125 patient questionnaires were administered and patient charts for 1 year were reviewed. All metrics were successfully collected. The study site met the proposed targets for timely process (7 hours from admission to surgery) and effective outcome (3% readmission rate). Other indicators results were equitable structure (1.1 median patient income to catchment population) and equitable outcome (2.5% at risk of catastrophic expenditure), safe outcome (2.6% perioperative mortality rate) and effective structure (fully qualified surgeon present 98% of cases). CONCLUSION: It is feasible to apply a novel surgical quality measurement tool in resource-limited settings. Prospective collection of all metrics integrated within existing hospital structures is recommended. Further applications of the tool will allow the metrics and targets to be refined and weighted to better guide surgical quality improvement measures.
Subject(s)
Quality of Health Care/standards , Surgical Procedures, Operative/standards , Brazil , Cross-Sectional Studies , Evidence-Based Practice/instrumentation , Evidence-Based Practice/methods , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Health Resources/supply & distribution , Humans , Quality Assurance, Health Care/methods , Quality of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Surgical Procedures, Operative/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
The objective of the study was to analyse resources for rheumatology training, and speciality certification and recertification requirements in Argentina. Information was gathered regarding vacancies, entry requirements, duration and validity of the specialist degree in every residency and postgraduate course in adult rheumatology. The following aspects were analysed: monitoring authority, certification and recertification requirements, and mandatory recertification. Six out of 36 universities offer rheumatology postgraduate courses. Out of 65 vacancies, 36 (55%) are implemented by a National Public University in the Autonomous City of Buenos Aires (CABA), and 46 (70%) are in CABA. There are 32 vacancies for rheumatology residencies in 7 out of 24 districts, 16 of them (50%) in CABA. There are 2- to 3-year postgraduate courses; entry requirements range from 1-year experience in internal medicine to either complete residency or specialist degree in internal medicine. Training formats vary from full-time university residency to either university-based courses with part-time dedication in a rheumatology service without residency or non-university courses with part-time dedication. Not every specialist degree is automatically homologated in every jurisdiction. Provincial governments and colleges of physicians are the certification and recertification authorities; medical school was included in one district. Recertification is mandatory in only 8 districts; 40-50% of the process is achieved by merely practising as a rheumatologist. Most of the training resources are concentrated in CABA. Although there are various options, not all of them are automatically homologated. Recertification is not mandatory nationwide, and a significant part of the process involves practising as a rheumatologist.
Subject(s)
Certification/standards , Education, Medical, Graduate/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatology/education , Argentina , Health Resources/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Rheumatology/standards , UniversitiesABSTRACT
Objective: This study aimed to estimate asthma control at specialist treatment centers in four Latin American countries and assess factors influencing poor asthma control.Methods: Patients aged ≥12 years with an asthma diagnosis and asthma medication prescription, followed at outpatient specialist centers in Argentina, Chile, Colombia, and Mexico, were included. The study received all applicable ethical approvals. The Asthma Control Test (ACT) was used to classify patients as having controlled (ACT 20-25) or uncontrolled (ACT ≤19) asthma. Frequency and statistical tests were used to assess the association between hospital admissions/exacerbations/emergency department (ED) visits and uncontrolled asthma; multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association of uncontrolled asthma with clinical/demographic variables.Results: A total of 594 patients were included. Overall controlled-asthma prevalence was 43.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 39.0, 47.4). Patients with uncontrolled asthma were more likely to be women (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.85; p = 0.003), non-white (aOR: 2.14; p < 0.001), obese (aOR: 1.71; p = 0.036), to have a low monthly family income (aOR: 1.75; p = 0.004), to have severe asthma (aOR:1.59; p = 0.26), and, compared with patients with controlled asthma, to have a higher likelihood of asthma exacerbations (34.5% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.001), hospital admissions (6.9% vs. 3.1%; p = 0.042), and ED visits (34.5% vs. 15.9%; p < 0.001) due to asthma.Conclusions: Even in specialist ambulatory services, fewer than half of patients were classified as having controlled asthma. The proportion of uncontrolled patients varied according to clinical and demographic variables.