ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To study school lifestyle interventions for elementary school children (The Healthy Primary School of the Future). RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the effects of the introduction of increased physical activity with or without healthy nutrition on health behaviour and BMI of young children and what are the costs of this program? DESIGN: Prospective controlled non-randomized study with nearly 1700 children in Parkstad (South-East Netherlands). RESULTS: Preliminary results after two years show that the combination of increased physical activity and healthy nutrition result in a decreased BMIz-score (-0.036), increased physical activity alone in hardly any change (-0.10) while in the control group the BMIz-score increased (0.052). The net societal costs of the combination of physical activity and health nutrition costs were 1 euro per child per day. CONCLUSION: The study contributes to the increasing amount of evidence proving that lifestyle interventions are effective in reducing the obesity epidemic. Future studies will show whether a weight reduction in children will result in the prevention of chronic disease later on in life and what the cost reduction related to this result will be.
Subject(s)
Diet, Healthy/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Healthy People Programs/economics , Pediatric Obesity/prevention & control , School Health Services/economics , Child , Child, Preschool , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diet, Healthy/methods , Exercise , Female , Healthy People Programs/methods , Humans , Life Style , Male , Netherlands , Pediatric Obesity/economics , Program Evaluation , Prospective Studies , Schools/economicsABSTRACT
This study aims to quantify the aggregate potential life-years (LYs) saved and healthcare cost-savings if the Healthy People 2020 objective were met to reduce invasive colorectal cancer (CRC) incidence by 15%. We identified patients (n=886,380) diagnosed with invasive CRC between 2001 and 2011 from a nationally representative cancer dataset. We stratified these patients by sex, race/ethnicity, and age. Using these data and data from the 2001-2011 U.S. life tables, we estimated a survival function for each CRC group and the corresponding reference group and computed per-person LYs saved. We estimated per-person annual healthcare cost-savings using the 2008-2012 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. We calculated aggregate LYs saved and cost-savings by multiplying the reduced number of CRC patients by the per-person LYs saved and lifetime healthcare cost-savings, respectively. We estimated an aggregate of 84,569 and 64,924 LYs saved for men and women, respectively, accounting for healthcare cost-savings of $329.3 and $294.2 million (in 2013$), respectively. Per person, we estimated 6.3 potential LYs saved related to those who developed CRC for both men and women, and healthcare cost-savings of $24,000 for men and $28,000 for women. Non-Hispanic whites and those aged 60-64 had the highest aggregate potential LYs saved and cost-savings. Achieving the HP2020 objective of reducing invasive CRC incidence by 15% by year 2020 would potentially save nearly 150,000 life-years and $624 million on healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Cost Savings/statistics & numerical data , Healthy People Programs/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Age Factors , Aged , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Cost Savings/economics , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To examine the extent to which recently published cost-utility analyses (cost-effectiveness analyses using quality-adjusted life-years to measure health benefits) have covered the leading health concerns in the US Department of Health and Human Services Healthy People 2020 report. METHODS: We examined data in the Tufts Medical Center Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Registry, a database containing 5000 published cost-utility analyses published in the MEDLINE literature through 2014. We focused on US-based cost-utility analyses published from 2011 through 2014 (n = 687). Two reviewers scanned abstracts and met for a consensus on categorization of cost-utility analyses that addressed the specific priorities listed in the 12 Healthy People 2020 areas (n = 120). RESULTS: Although 7.3% of recently published cost-utility analyses addressed key clinical preventive services, only about 2% of recently published cost-utility analyses covered each of the following Healthy People 2020 topics: reproductive and sexual health, nutrition/physical activity/obesity, maternal and infant health, and tobacco. Fewer than 1% addressed priorities such as injuries and violence, mental health or substance abuse, environmental quality, and oral health. CONCLUSIONS: Few cost-utility analyses have addressed Healthy People 2020 priority areas.
Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Services Needs and Demand , Healthy People Programs/economics , Female , Health Priorities , Humans , Male , RegistriesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Majority of the countries in the World Health Organization (WHO) African Region are not on track to achieve the health-related Millennium Development Goals, yet even more ambitious Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), including SDG 3 on heath, have been adopted. This paper highlights the challenges - amplified by the recent Ebola virus disease (EVD) outbreak in West Africa - that require WHO and other partners' dialogue in support of the countries, and debate on how WHO can leverage the existing space and place to foster health development dialogues in the Region. DISCUSSION: To realise SDG 3 on ensuring healthy lives and promoting well-being for all at all ages, the African Region needs to tackle the persistent weaknesses in its health systems, systems that address the social determinants of health and national health research systems. The performance of the third item is crucial for the development and innovation of systems, products and tools for promoting, maintaining and restoring health in an equitable manner. Under its new leadership, the WHO Regional Office for Africa is transforming itself to galvanise existing partnerships, as well as forging new ones, with a view to accelerating the provision of timely and quality support to the countries in pursuit of SDG 3. WHO in the African Region engages in dialogues with various stakeholders in the process of health development. The EVD outbreak in West Africa accentuated the necessity for optimally exploiting currently available space and place for health development discourse. There is urgent need for the WHO Regional Office for Africa to fully leverage the space and place arenas of the World Health Assembly, WHO Regional Committee for Africa, African Union, Regional economic communities, Harmonization for Health in Africa, United Nations Economic Commission for Africa, African Development Bank, professional associations, and WHO African Health Forum, when it is created, for dialogues to mobilise the required resources to give the African Region the thrust it needs to attain SDG 3. CONCLUSIONS: The pursuit of SDG 3 amidst multiple challenges related to political leadership and governance, weak health systems, sub-optimal systems for addressing the socioeconomic determinants of health, and weak national health research systems calls for optimum use of all the space and place available for regional health development dialogues to supplement Member States' efforts.
Subject(s)
Conservation of Natural Resources , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Adolescent , Adult , Africa, Western/epidemiology , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks , Female , Global Health , Government Agencies/organization & administration , Government Programs/economics , Government Programs/organization & administration , Health Expenditures , Health Promotion/economics , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Health Resources/economics , Health Resources/organization & administration , Health Status Indicators , Healthcare Disparities , Healthy People Programs/economics , Hemorrhagic Fever, Ebola/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Life Expectancy , Male , Middle Aged , Socioeconomic Factors , World Health Organization , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A number of Global health initiatives (GHIs) have been created to support low and middle income countries. Their support has been of different forms. The African Region has benefitted immensely from GHIs and continues to register an increase in health partnerships and initiatives. However, information on the functioning and operationalisation of GHIs in the countries is limited. METHODS: This study involved two country case studies, one in Tanzania and the other one in Zambia. Data were collected using a semi-structured questionnaire. The aims were to understand and profile the GHIs supporting health development and to assess their governance and alignment with country priorities, harmonisation and alignment of their interventions and efforts, and contribution towards health systems strengthening. The respondents included senior officers from health stakeholder agencies at the national and sub-national levels. The qualitative data were analysed using thematic content analysis in MAXQDA software. RESULTS: Health systems in both Tanzania and Zambia are decentralised. They have benefitted from GHI support in fighting the common health problems of HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, malaria and vaccine-preventable diseases. In both countries, no GHI adequately made use of the existing Sector-wide Approach (SWAp) mechanisms but they largely operate through their unique structures and committees. GHI efforts to improve general health governance have not been matched with similar efforts from the countries. Their support to health system strengthening has not been comprehensive but has involved the selection of a few areas some of which were disease-focused. On the positive side, however, in both Tanzania and Zambia improved alignment with the countries' priorities is noted in that most of the proposals submitted to the GHIs refer to the priorities, objectives and strategies in the national health development plans and, GHIs depend on the national health information systems. CONCLUSION: GHIs are important funders of health in low and middle income countries. However, there is a need for the countries to take a proactive role in improving the governance, coordination and planning of the GHIs that they benefit from. This will also maximise the return on investment for the GHIs.
Subject(s)
Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Health Policy , Health Priorities/organization & administration , Health Promotion/organization & administration , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Financial Management , Global Health , Health Planning/economics , Health Planning/organization & administration , Health Priorities/economics , Health Promotion/economics , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Humans , International Cooperation , Organizations/economics , Organizations/organization & administration , Tanzania , ZambiaSubject(s)
Developing Countries , Health Workforce/trends , Healthy People Programs/standards , Public Health/standards , Developing Countries/economics , Foreign Medical Graduates/economics , Foreign Medical Graduates/trends , Health Workforce/economics , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Humans , International Cooperation , Population Dynamics/trends , Public Health/economicsABSTRACT
Successive Governments of India have promised to transform India's unsatisfactory health-care system, culminating in the present government's promise to expand health assurance for all. Despite substantial improvements in some health indicators in the past decade, India contributes disproportionately to the global burden of disease, with health indicators that compare unfavourably with other middle-income countries and India's regional neighbours. Large health disparities between states, between rural and urban populations, and across social classes persist. A large proportion of the population is impoverished because of high out-of-pocket health-care expenditures and suffers the adverse consequences of poor quality of care. Here we make the case not only for more resources but for a radically new architecture for India's health-care system. India needs to adopt an integrated national health-care system built around a strong public primary care system with a clearly articulated supportive role for the private and indigenous sectors. This system must address acute as well as chronic health-care needs, offer choice of care that is rational, accessible, and of good quality, support cashless service at point of delivery, and ensure accountability through governance by a robust regulatory framework. In the process, several major challenges will need to be confronted, most notably the very low levels of public expenditure; the poor regulation, rapid commercialisation of and corruption in health care; and the fragmentation of governance of health care. Most importantly, assuring universal health coverage will require the explicit acknowledgment, by government and civil society, of health care as a public good on par with education. Only a radical restructuring of the health-care system that promotes health equity and eliminates impoverishment due to out-of-pocket expenditures will assure health for all Indians by 2022--a fitting way to mark the 75th year of India's independence.
Subject(s)
Universal Health Insurance/organization & administration , Cost of Illness , Costs and Cost Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Delivery of Health Care/organization & administration , Female , Health Care Reform/economics , Health Care Reform/organization & administration , Health Expenditures , Health Information Systems/organization & administration , Health Information Systems/standards , Health Status Disparities , Health Workforce/standards , Health Workforce/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Humans , India , Insurance, Health , Life Expectancy , Male , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Primary Health Care/standards , Private Sector/economics , Private Sector/organization & administration , Public Sector/economics , Public Sector/organization & administration , Quality of Health Care , Residence Characteristics , Rural Health , Sex Distribution , Sex Ratio , State Medicine/economics , State Medicine/organization & administration , Universal Health Insurance/economics , Urban HealthABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable morbidity and mortality. Our review highlights research from 2013 to 2015 on the treatment of cigarette smoking, with a focus on heart patients and cardiovascular outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: Seeking to maximize the reach and effectiveness of existing cessation medications, current tobacco control research has demonstrated the safety and efficacy of combination treatment, extended use, reduce-to-quit strategies, and personalized approaches to treatment matching. Further, cytisine has gained interest as a lower-cost strategy for addressing the global tobacco epidemic. On the harm reduction front, snus and electronic nicotine delivery systems are being widely distributed and promoted with major gaps in knowledge of the safety of long-term and dual use. Quitlines, comparable in outcome to in-person treatment, make cessation counseling available on a national scale, though use rates remain relatively low. Employee reward programs are gaining attention given the high costs of tobacco use to employers; sustaining quit rates postpayment, however, has proven challenging. SUMMARY: Evidence-based cessation treatments exist. Broader dissemination, adoption, and implementation are key to addressing the tobacco epidemic. The cardiology team has a professional obligation to advance tobacco control efforts and can play an important role in achieving a smoke-free future.
Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Risk Reduction Behavior , Smoking Cessation , Smoking , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/prevention & control , Cardiovascular Diseases/psychology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Healthy People Programs/economics , Humans , Smoking/adverse effects , Smoking/epidemiology , Smoking/therapy , Smoking Cessation/economics , Smoking Cessation/methods , Smoking Cessation/psychology , Nicotiana/adverse effects , Tobacco Use Cessation DevicesABSTRACT
This article examines the experience of a frontier-based community health center when it utilized the Tool for Health and Resilience in Vulnerable Environments (THRIVE) for assessing social determinants of health with a local health consortium. Community members (N = 357) rated safety, jobs, housing, and education among the top health issues. Community leaders integrated these health priorities in a countywide strategic planning process. This example of a frontier county in New Mexico demonstrates the critical role that community health centers play when engaging with local residents to assess community health needs for strategic planning and policy development.
Subject(s)
Community Health Centers/organization & administration , Community-Based Participatory Research/organization & administration , Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Patient-Centered Care/organization & administration , Social Determinants of Health , Community-Based Participatory Research/economics , Community-Based Participatory Research/methods , Health Planning/economics , Health Planning/methods , Health Planning/organization & administration , Health Policy , Health Priorities , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/methods , Humans , New Mexico , Organizational Case Studies , Patient-Centered Care/economics , Patient-Centered Care/standardsSubject(s)
Adolescent Health Services/standards , Evidence-Based Practice , Healthy People Programs/standards , Pregnancy in Adolescence/prevention & control , Public Health/standards , Adolescent , Adolescent Health Services/economics , Adolescent Health Services/organization & administration , Female , Healthy People Programs/economics , Healthy People Programs/methods , Humans , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Adolescence/statistics & numerical data , Public Health/economics , Public Health/methods , United States/epidemiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The prevalence of male obesity is increasing but few men take part in weight loss programmes. We assessed the effect of a weight loss and healthy living programme on weight loss in football (soccer) fans. METHODS: We did a two-group, pragmatic, randomised controlled trial of 747 male football fans aged 35-65 years with a body-mass index (BMI) of 28 kg/m(2) or higher from 13 Scottish professional football clubs. Participants were randomly assigned with SAS (version 9·2, block size 2-9) in a 1:1 ratio, stratified by club, to a weight loss programme delivered by community coaching staff in 12 sessions held every week. The intervention group started a weight loss programme within 3 weeks, and the comparison group were put on a 12 month waiting list. All participants received a weight management booklet. Primary outcome was mean difference in weight loss between groups at 12 months, expressed as absolute weight and a percentage of their baseline weight. Primary outcome assessment was masked. Analyses were based on intention to treat. The trial is registered with Current Controlled Trials, number ISRCTN32677491. FINDINGS: 374 men were allocated to the intervention group and 374 to the comparison group. 333 (89%) of the intervention group and 355 (95%) of the comparison group completed 12 month assessments. At 12 months the mean difference in weight loss between groups, adjusted for baseline weight and club, was 4·94 kg (95% CI 3·95-5·94) and percentage weight loss, similarly adjusted, was 4·36% (3·64-5·08), both in favour of the intervention (p<0·0001). Eight serious adverse events were reported, five in the intervention group (lost consciousness due to drugs for pre-existing angina, gallbladder removal, hospital admission with suspected heart attack, ruptured gut, and ruptured Achilles tendon) and three in the comparison group (transient ischaemic attack, and two deaths). Of these, two adverse events were reported as related to participation in the programme (gallbladder removal and ruptured Achilles tendon). INTERPRETATION: The FFIT programme can help a large proportion of men to lose a clinically important amount of weight; it offers one effective strategy to challenge male obesity. FUNDING: Scottish Government and The UK Football Pools funded delivery of the programme through a grant to the Scottish Premier League Trust. The National Institute for Health Research Public Health Research Programme funded the assessment (09/3010/06).
Subject(s)
Health Promotion/methods , Healthy People Programs/methods , Overweight/prevention & control , Soccer , Weight Loss/physiology , Adult , Aged , Body Mass Index , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Exercise Therapy/economics , Exercise Therapy/methods , Healthy People Programs/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/prevention & control , Risk Reduction Behavior , Scotland , Treatment OutcomeSubject(s)
Healthy People Programs/organization & administration , Obesity/prevention & control , Weight Reduction Programs/organization & administration , Adolescent , Body Mass Index , Child , Child, Preschool , Environment Design , Family Health , Financing, Organized/methods , Food Supply/economics , Food Supply/standards , Health Care Coalitions/economics , Health Care Coalitions/organization & administration , Healthy People Programs/economics , Humans , Motor Activity , Obesity/economics , Obesity/epidemiology , Organizational Case Studies , Play and Playthings , Poverty Areas , Urban Health , Weight Reduction Programs/economicsABSTRACT
This article summarizes a process which exemplifies the potential impact of municipal investment on the burden of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in city populations. We report on Developing an evidence-based approach to city public health planning and investment in Europe (DECiPHEr), a project part funded by the European Union. It had twin objectives: first, to develop and validate a vocational educational training package for policy makers and political decision takers; second, to use this opportunity to iterate a robust and user-friendly investment tool for maximizing the public health impact of 'mainstream' municipal policies, programs and investments. There were seven stages in the development process shared by an academic team from Sheffield Hallam University and partners from four cities drawn from the WHO European Healthy Cities Network. There were five iterations of the model resulting from this process. The initial focus was CVD as the biggest cause of death and disability in Europe. Our original prototype 'cost offset' model was confined to proximal determinants of CVD, utilizing modified 'Framingham' equations to estimate the impact of population level cardiovascular risk factor reduction on future demand for acute hospital admissions. The DECiPHEr iterations first extended the scope of the model to distal determinants and then focused progressively on practical interventions. Six key domains of local influence on population health were introduced into the model by the development process: education, housing, environment, public health, economy and security. Deploying a realist synthesis methodology, the model then connected distal with proximal determinants of CVD. Existing scientific evidence and cities' experiential knowledge were 'plugged-in' or 'triangulated' to elaborate the causal pathways from domain interventions to public health impacts. A key product is an enhanced version of the cost offset model, named Sheffield Health Effectiveness Framework Tool, incorporating both proximal and distal determinants in estimating the cost benefits of domain interventions. A key message is that the insights of the policy community are essential in developing and then utilising such a predictive tool.
Subject(s)
Administrative Personnel/education , Cardiovascular Diseases/economics , City Planning/education , Health Policy/economics , Healthy People Programs/economics , Public Health/economics , Administrative Personnel/economics , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cities/economics , City Planning/economics , Decision Making, Organizational , Europe/epidemiology , European Union/economics , Healthy People Programs/methods , Healthy People Programs/standards , Humans , Investments/economics , Models, Theoretical , Public Health/standards , Vocational Education/methods , Vocational Education/standards , World Health OrganizationABSTRACT
Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) 4 and 5 set ambitious targets to reduce maternal, newborn and child mortality by 2015. With 2015 fast approaching, there has been a concerted effort in the global health community to "close the gap" on the MDG targets. Recent consensus initiatives and frameworks have refocused attention on evidence-based, low-cost interventions that can reduce mortality and morbidity, and have argued for additional funding to increase access to and coverage of these life-saving interventions. However, funding alone will not close the gap on MDGs 4 and 5. Even when high-quality, affordable products and services are readily available, uptake is often low. Progress will therefore require not just money, but also advances in health-related behavior change and decision-making. Behavioral economics offers one way to achieve real progress by improving our understanding of how individuals make choices under information and time constraints, and by offering new approaches to make it easier for individuals to do what is in their best interest and harder to do what is not. We introduce five behavioral economic principles and demonstrate how they could boost efforts to improve maternal, newborn, and child health in pursuit of MDGs 4 and 5.
Subject(s)
Health Services Accessibility/standards , Healthy People Programs/standards , Infant Mortality , Maternal Mortality , Female , Health Behavior , Health Expenditures , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Healthy People Programs/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Reproductive Health Services/economics , Reproductive Health Services/supply & distribution , Socioeconomic Factors , SurvivalABSTRACT
Development assistance for health has increased every year between 2000 and 2010, particularly for HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, and malaria, to reach US$26·66 billion in 2010. The continued global economic crisis means that increased external financing from traditional donors is unlikely in the near term. Hence, new funding has to be sought from innovative financing sources to sustain the gains made in global health, to achieve the health Millennium Development Goals, and to address the emerging burden from non-communicable diseases. We use the value chain approach to conceptualise innovative financing. With this framework, we identify three integrated innovative financing mechanisms-GAVI, Global Fund, and UNITAID-that have reached a global scale. These three financing mechanisms have innovated along each step of the innovative finance value chain-namely resource mobilisation, pooling, channelling, resource allocation, and implementation-and integrated these steps to channel large amounts of funding rapidly to low-income and middle-income countries to address HIV/AIDS, malaria, tuberculosis, and vaccine-preventable diseases. However, resources mobilised from international innovative financing sources are relatively modest compared with donor assistance from traditional sources. Instead, the real innovation has been establishment of new organisational forms as integrated financing mechanisms that link elements of the financing value chain to more effectively and efficiently mobilise, pool, allocate, and channel financial resources to low-income and middle-income countries and to create incentives to improve implementation and performance of national programmes. These mechanisms provide platforms for health funding in the future, especially as efforts to grow innovative financing have faltered. The lessons learnt from these mechanisms can be used to develop and expand innovative financing from international sources to address health needs in low-income and middle-income countries.