Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 75
Filter
1.
Crit Care Explor ; 6(7): e1121, 2024 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38958545

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the actual cost and drivers of the cost of an extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) care cycle. PERSPECTIVE: A time-driven activity-based costing study conducted from a healthcare provider perspective. SETTING: A quaternary care ICU providing around-the-clock E-CPR service for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) and in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) in Australia. METHODS: The E-CPR care cycle was defined as the time from initiating E-CPR to hospital discharge or death of the patient. Detailed process maps with discrete steps and probabilistic decision nodes accounting for the complex trajectories of E-CPR patients were developed. Data about clinical and nonclinical resources and timing of activities was collected multiple times for each process . Total direct costs were calculated using the time estimates and unit costs per resource for all clinical and nonclinical resources. The total direct costs were combined with indirect costs to obtain the total cost of E-CPR. RESULTS: From 10 E-CPR care cycles observed during the study period, a minimum of 3 observations were obtained per process. The E-CPR care cycle's mean (95% CI) cost was $75,014 ($66,209-83,222). Initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and ECMO management constituted 18% of costs. The ICU management (35%) and surgical costs (20%) were the primary cost determinants. IHCA had a higher mean (95% CI) cost than OHCA ($87,940 [75,372-100,570] vs. 62,595 [53,994-71,890], p < 0.01), mainly because of the increased survival and ICU length of stay of patients with IHCA. The mean cost for each E-CPR survivor was $129,503 ($112,422-147,224). CONCLUSIONS: Significant costs are associated with E-CPR for refractory cardiac arrest. The cost of E-CPR for IHCA was higher compared with the cost of E-CPR for OHCA. The major determinants of the E-CPR costs were ICU and surgical costs. These data can inform the cost-effectiveness analysis of E-CPR in the future.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest , Humans , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/economics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/therapy , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/economics , Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest/mortality , Australia , Intensive Care Units/economics , Time Factors , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/mortality , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Costs and Cost Analysis
2.
Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care ; 9(4): 333-341, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32004079

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock keeps increasing, but its cost-utility is unknown. METHODS: We studied retrospectively the cost-utility of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a five-year cohort of consequent patients treated due to refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest in a transplant centre in 2013-2017. In our centre, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is considered for all cardiogenic shock patients potentially eligible for heart transplantation, and for selected postcardiotomy patients. We assessed the costs of the index hospitalization and of the one-year hospital costs, and the patients' health-related quality of life (response rate 71.7%). Based on the data and the population-based life expectancies, we calculated the amount and the costs of quality-adjusted life years gained both without discount and with an annual discount of 3.5%. RESULTS: The cohort included 102 patients (78 cardiogenic shock; 24 cardiac arrest) of whom 67 (65.7%) survived to discharge and 66 (64.7%) to one year. The effective costs per one hospital survivor were 242,303€. Median in-hospital costs of the index hospitalization per patient were 129,967€ (interquartile range 150,340€). Mean predicted number of quality-adjusted life years gained by the treatment was 20.9 (standard deviation 9.7) without discount, and the median cost per quality-adjusted life year was 7474€ (interquartile range 10,973€). With the annual discount of 3.5%, 13.0 (standard deviation 4.8) quality-adjusted life years were gained with the cost of 12,642€ per quality-adjusted life year (interquartile range 15,059€). CONCLUSIONS: We found the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest justified from the cost-utility point of view in a transplant centre setting.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Heart Arrest/therapy , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Patient Selection , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/economics
3.
Intensive Care Med ; 45(11): 1580-1589, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31529353

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used as temporary cardiorespiratory support in critically ill patients. Little is known about population-level short- and long-term outcomes following ECMO, including healthcare use and health system cost across a wide range of sectors. METHODS: Population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada (October 1, 2009-March 31, 2017) of adult patients (≥ 18 years) receiving ECMO for cardiorespiratory support. We captured outcomes through linkage to health administrative databases. Primary outcome was mortality during hospitalization, as well as at 7 days, 30 days, 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years following ECMO initiation. We analyzed health system costs (in Canadian dollars) in the 1 year following the date of the index admission. RESULTS: A total of 692 patients were included. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) age was 51.3 (16.0) years. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) time to ECMO initiation from date of admission was 2 (0-9) days. In-hospital mortality was 40.0%. Mortality at 1 year, 2 years, and 5 years was 45.1%, 49.0%, and 57.4%, respectively. Among survivors, 78.4% were discharged home, while 21.2% were discharged to continuing care. Median (IQR) total costs in the 1 year following admission among all patients were Canadian $130,157 (Canadian $58,645-Canadian $240,763), of which Canadian $91,192 (Canadian $38,507-Canadian $184,728) were attributed to inpatient care. CONCLUSIONS: Hospital mortality among critically ill adults receiving ECMO for advanced cardiopulmonary support is relatively high, but does not markedly increase in the years following discharge. Survivors are more likely to be discharged home than to continuing care. Median costs are high, but largely reflect inpatient hospital costs, and not costs incurred following discharge.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Critical Illness/mortality , Critical Illness/therapy , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/mortality , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality/trends , Ontario/epidemiology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/economics , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/mortality , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/economics , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Treatment Outcome
4.
CMAJ ; 191(1): E3-E10, 2019 01 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30617227

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Survivors of acute health events can experience lasting reductions in functional status and quality of life, as well as reduced ability to work and earn income. We aimed to assess the effect of acute myocardial infarction (MI), cardiac arrest and stroke on work and earning among working-age people. METHODS: For this retrospective cohort study, we used the Canadian Hospitalization and Taxation Database, which contains linked hospital and income tax data, from 2005 to 2013 to perform difference-in-difference analyses. We matched patients admitted to hospital for acute MI, cardiac arrest or stroke with controls who were not admitted to hospital for these indications. Participants were aged 40-61 years, worked in the 2 years before the event and were alive 3 years after the event. Patients were matched to controls for 11 variables. The primary outcome was working status 3 years postevent. We also assessed earnings change attributable to the event. We matched 19 129 particpants who were admitted to hospital with acute MI, 1043 with cardiac arrest and 4395 with stroke to 1 820 644, 307 375 and 888 481 controls, respectively. RESULTS: Fewer of the patients who were admitted to hospital were working 3 years postevent than controls for acute MI (by 5.0 percentage points [pp], 95% confidence interval [CI] 4.5-5.5), cardiac arrest (by 12.9 pp, 95% CI 10.4-15.3) and stroke (by 19.8 pp, 95% CI 18.5-23.5). Mean (95% CI) earnings declines attributable to the events were $3834 (95% CI 3346-4323) for acute MI, $11 143 (95% CI 8962-13 324) for cardiac arrest, and $13 278 (95% CI 12 301-14 255) for stroke. The effects on income were greater for patients who had lower baseline earnings, comorbid disease, longer hospital length of stay or needed mechanical ventilation. Sex, marital status or self-employment status did not affect income declines. INTERPRETATION: Acute MI, cardiac arrest and stroke all resulted in substantial loss in employment and earnings that persisted for at least 3 years after the events. These outcomes have consequences for patients, families, employers and governments. Identification of subgroups at high risk for these losses may assist in targeting interventions, policies and legislation to promote return to work.


Subject(s)
Disabled Persons/statistics & numerical data , Employment/economics , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Heart Arrest/economics , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Stroke/economics , Adult , Canada/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Disability Evaluation , Female , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Heart Arrest/rehabilitation , Hospitalization , Humans , Income , Insurance, Health/economics , Insurance, Health/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Myocardial Infarction/rehabilitation , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Socioeconomic Factors , Stroke/epidemiology
5.
Glob Heart ; 13(4): 255-260, 2018 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30131253

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health care resource allocation remains challenging in lower middle income countries such as Kenya with meager resources being allocated to resuscitation and critical care. The causes and outcomes for in-hospital cardiac arrest and resuscitation have not been studied. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the initial rhythm and the survival for patients developing in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS: This was a prospective study for in-hospital cardiac arrest in 6 Kenyan hospitals from July 2014 to April 2016. Resuscitation teams were utilized to collect data during resuscitation using a standardized protocol. Patients with do-not-resuscitate orders, trauma, postsurgical, and pregnancy-related complications were excluded. The Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS)- systolic blood pressure, heart rate, respiration rate, temperature, and responsiveness-was determined based on worst parameters at least 4 hours prior to the arrest. RESULTS: A total of 353 patients with cardiac arrest were included over 19 months. The mean age was 61 years, 53.5% were male, and admission diagnoses included cardiovascular disease (15%), pneumonia 18.13%, and cancer 9%. The mean MEWS was 4.48 and low, intermediate, and high MEWS were found in 25.8%, 29.5%, and 44.8%, respectively. The mean time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 0.84 min. The initial rhythm was asystole in 47.6%, pulseless electrical activity in 38.2%, ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation in 5.4%, and unknown in 8.8%. Return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) occurred in 29.2% of patients with the mean time to ROSC being 5.3 min. ROSC occurred in 17.3% of patients with asystole, 40.7% in pulseless electrical activity, 57.9% in ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation, and 25.8% in patients with an unknown rhythm. Of all patients, 16 (4.2%) were discharged alive. CONCLUSIONS: Nonshockable rhythms account for the majority of the cardiac arrests in hospitals in a lower middle income country and are associated with unfavorable outcomes. Future work should be directed to training health care personnel in recognizing early warning signs and implementing appropriate measures in a resource-scarce environment.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Developing Countries , Heart Arrest/therapy , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Kenya/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Population Surveillance , Poverty , Prospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends
6.
PLoS One ; 13(5): e0196687, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29715272

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The annual increase in costs and the quality of life of survivors of cardiac arrest are major concerns. This study used National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan to evaluate the 1-year survival rate and the annual healthcare costs of survivors after cardiac arrest. METHODS: This retrospective, fixed-cohort study conducted from 2006 to 2012, involved 2 million individuals randomly selected from the NHIRD of Taiwan. Adult patients at least 18 years old who were diagnosed with cardiac arrest were enrolled. Survival was followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: In total, 2,256 patients were enrolled. The survivor cohort accounted for 4% (89/2256) of the study population. There were no significant differences in the demographic characteristics of the survival and non-survival cohorts, with the exceptions of gender (male: survival vs. non-survival, 50.6% vs. 64.5%, p = 0.007), diabetes mellitus (49.4% vs. 35.8%, p = 0.009), and acute coronary syndrome (44.9% vs. 31.9%, p = 0.010). Only 38 (1.7%) patients survived for > 1 year. The mean re-admission to hospital during the 1-year follow up was 73.5 (SD: 110.2) days. The mean healthcare cost during the 1-year follow up was $12,953. Factors associated with total healthcare costs during the 1-year follow up were as follows: city or county of residence, being widowed, and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (city or county of residence, ß: -23,604, p < 0.001; being widowed, ß: 25,588, p = 0.049; COPD, ß: 14,438, p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: There was a great burden of the annual healthcare costs of survivors of cardiac arrest. Socioeconomic status and comorbidity were major confounders of costs. The outcome measures of cardiac arrest should extend beyond the death, and encompass destitution. These findings add to our knowledge of the health economics and indicate future research about healthcare of cardiac arrest survivors.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/mortality , Aged , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Care Costs , Humans , Male , National Health Programs/economics , Quality of Life , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Survivors , Taiwan
8.
Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol ; 11(4): e005689, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29654127

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study was designed to estimate the costs of index hospitalizations after cardiac arrest in the United States. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample (2003-2012) to identify patients with cardiac arrest. Log transformation of inflation-adjusted cost was determined for care to patient outcomes. Overall, an estimated 1 387 396 patients were hospitalized after cardiac arrest. The mean age of the cohort was 66 years, 45% were women, and the majority were white. Inpatient procedures included coronary angiography (15%), percutaneous coronary intervention (7%), intra-aortic balloon pump (4.4%), therapeutic hypothermia (1.1%), and mechanical circulatory support (0.1%). The rates of therapeutic hypothermia increased from zero in 2003 to 2.7% in 2012 (P<0.001). Both hospital charges and inflation-adjusted cost increased linearly over time. In a multivariate analysis, predictors of inflation-adjusted cost included large hospital size, urban teaching hospital, and length of stay. Among comorbidities, atrial fibrillation or fluid and electrolytes imbalance was most associated with cost. Among selected interventions, the cost was significantly increased with automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillators (odds ratio, 1.83; P<0.001), intra-aortic balloon pump (odds ratio, 1.50; P<0.001), hypothermia (odds ratio, 1.28; P<0.001), and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (odds ratio, 2.38; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the period between 2003 and 2012, postcardiac arrest hospitalizations resulted in a steady rise in associated health care cost, likely related to increased length of stay, medical procedures, and systems of care. Although targeted cost containment for postarrest interventions may reduce the finance burden, there is an increasing need for funding research into prediction and prevention of cardiac arrest, which offers greater societal benefit.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hospital Costs , Hospitalization/economics , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/economics , Aged , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Arrest/diagnosis , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
9.
Am J Cardiol ; 121(12): 1587-1592, 2018 06 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29622287

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the financial implications and the impact of pre-existing atrial fibrillation (AF) on in-hospital outcomes in patients who underwent transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. We identified patients who underwent TAVI from 2011 to 2014. The primary end point was the effect of pre-existing AF on in-hospital mortality. Secondary end points included periprocedural cardiac complications, stroke, and hemorrhage requiring transfusion. We also assessed length of stay (LOS) and cost of hospitalization. A mixed-effect logistic model was used for clinical end points, and a linear mixed model was used for cost and LOS. In 6,778 patients who underwent TAVI (46.1% women and 81.4 ± 8.5 years old), the incidence of AF was 43.3%. After adjusting for patient- and hospital-level characteristics, pre-existing AF was not found to influence in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 1.05, 95% confidence interval 0.80 to 1.36). AF was associated with an increased risk of periprocedural cardiac complications (odds ratio 1.46, 95% confidence interval 1.22 to 1.75), longer LOS (p <0.001) and an increased cost of hospitalization (US$51,852 vs US$49,599). In conclusion, pre-existing AF did not impact in-hospital mortality in TAVI patients but was associated with increased cardiac complications, a longer hospital LOS, and a higher cost of hospitalization.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aortic Valve Stenosis/epidemiology , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/economics , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/epidemiology , Cardiac Pacing, Artificial/statistics & numerical data , Cardiac Tamponade/economics , Cardiac Tamponade/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Heart Failure/economics , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Linear Models , Logistic Models , Male , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Myocardial Infarction/epidemiology , Pacemaker, Artificial , Pericardial Effusion/economics , Pericardial Effusion/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Hemorrhage/economics , Postoperative Hemorrhage/epidemiology , Stroke/economics , Stroke/epidemiology , United States
10.
Syst Rev ; 6(1): 205, 2017 10 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29041982

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Each year, about 500,000 people suffer a cardiac arrest (either out-of-hospital or in-hospital) in the USA. Although significant improvements in survival have occurred through the implementation of complex high-quality protocols of care, global costs related to such management are not clearly described. METHODS: We will undertake a systematic review of the published literature on costs related to the acute phase of cardiac arrest management (from collapse to hospital discharge). The search will cover the period 1991 to present, and we will include studies written in English or in French involving patients with cardiac arrest of all ages, settings (in- and out-of-hospital arrest), countries, and etiology (including traumatic). The primary outcome will include estimates of costs related to cardiac arrest patients' management in various categories (e.g., resuscitation process, in-hospital management as well as rehabilitation and long-term care facilities) and perspectives (e.g., hospital, societal, or third-payer perspective). Study selection will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, and data quality will be assessed by questions adapted from the Drummond economic evaluation checklist. DISCUSSION: This review will provide an estimate of costs related to cardiac arrest management according to the different components of such a management as well as total costs. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews PROSPERO CRD42016046993.


Subject(s)
Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Expenditures , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/rehabilitation , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hospitalization , Humans , Patient Discharge , Systematic Reviews as Topic
11.
Anaesthesiol Intensive Ther ; 49(2): 106-109, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28643322

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Severe accidental hypothermia is defined as a core temperature below 28 Celsius degrees. Within the last years, the issue of accidental hypothermia and accompanying cardiac arrest has been broadly discussed and European Resuscitation Council (ERC) Guidelines underline the importance of Extracorporeal Rewarming (ECR) in treatment of severely hypothermic victims. The study aimed to evaluate the actual costs of ECR with VA-ECMO and of further management in the Intensive Care Unit of patients admitted to the Severe Accidental Hypothermia Centre in Cracow, Poland. METHODS: We carried out the economic analysis of 31 hypothermic adults in stage III-IV (Swiss Staging) treated with VA ECMO. Twenty-nine individuals were further managed in the Intensive Care Unit. The actual treatment costs were evaluated based on current medication, equipment, and dressing pricing. The costs incurred by the John Paul II Hospital were then collated with the National Health Service (NHS) funding, assessed based on current financial contract. RESULTS: In most of the cases, the actual treatment cost was greater than the funding received by around 10000 PLN per patient. The positive financial balance was achieved in only 4 (14%) individuals; other 25 cases (86%) showed a financial loss. CONCLUSION: Performed analysis clearly shows that hospitals undertaking ECR may experience financial loss due to implementation of effective treatment recommended by international guidelines. Thanks to new NHS funding policy since January 2017 such loss can be avoided, what shall encourage hospitals to perform this expensive, yet effective method of treatment.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hypothermia/therapy , Rewarming/methods , Adult , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Health Care Costs , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/etiology , Humans , Hypothermia/economics , Intensive Care Units/economics , Poland , Rewarming/economics , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome
12.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 3(2): 174-183, 2017 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29759391

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of morbid obesity on outcomes in patients with in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA). BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with increased risk of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest; however, little is known about survival of morbidly obese patients with IHCA. METHODS: Using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database from 2001 to 2008, we identified adult patients undergoing resuscitation for IHCA, including those with morbid obesity (body mass index ≥40 kg/m2) by using International Classification of Diseases 9th edition codes and clinical outcomes. Outcomes including in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and discharge dispositions were identified. Logistic regression model was used to examine the independent association of morbid obesity with mortality. RESULTS: Of 1,293,071 IHCA cases, 27,469 cases (2.1%) were morbidly obese. The overall mortality was significantly higher for the morbidly obese group than for the nonobese group experiencing in-hospital non-ventricular fibrillation (non-VF) (77% vs. 73%, respectively; p = 0.006) or VF (65% vs. 58%, respectively; p = 0.01) arrest particularly if cardiac arrest happened late (>7 days) after hospitalization. Discharge to home was significantly lower in the morbidly obese group (21% vs. 31%, respectively; p = 0.04). After we adjusted for baseline variables, morbid obesity remained an independent predictor of increased mortality. Other independent predictors of mortality were age and severe sepsis for non-VF and VF group and venous thromboembolism, cirrhosis, stroke, malignancy, and rheumatologic conditions for non-VF group. CONCLUSIONS: The overall mortality of morbidly obese patients after IHCA is worse than that for nonobese patients, especially if IHCA occurs after 7 days of hospitalization and survivors are more likely to be transferred to a skilled nursing facility.


Subject(s)
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/methods , Heart Arrest/therapy , Obesity, Morbid/complications , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/economics , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/mortality , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/mortality , Hospital Costs , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity, Morbid/economics , Obesity, Morbid/mortality , Patient Transfer/economics , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Ventricular Fibrillation/complications , Ventricular Fibrillation/economics , Ventricular Fibrillation/therapy
13.
Am J Cardiol ; 118(5): 668-72, 2016 09 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27378144

ABSTRACT

Limited data exist regarding the in-hospital outcomes in patients with cardiac arrest (CA) in teaching versus nonteaching hospital settings. Using the Nationwide (National) Inpatient Sample (2008 to 2012), 731,107 cases of CA were identified using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition codes. Among these patients, 348,368 (47.6%) were managed in teaching hospitals and 376,035 (51.4%) in nonteaching hospitals. Patients in teaching hospitals with CA were younger (62.42 vs 68.08 years old), had less co-morbidities (p <0.001), were less likely to be white (54.6% vs 65.5%) and more likely to be uninsured (9.1% vs 7.6%). Mortality in patients with CA was significantly lower in teaching hospitals than in nonteaching hospitals (55.3% vs 58.8%; all p <0.001). The mortality remained significantly lower after adjusting for baseline patient and hospital characteristics (odds ratio 0.917, CI 0.899 to 0.937, p <0.001). However, the survival benefit was no longer present after adjusting for in-hospital procedures (OR 0.997, CI 0.974 to 1.02, p = 0.779). In conclusion, teaching status of the hospital was associated with decreased in-hospital mortality in patients with CA. The differences in mortality disappeared after adjusting for in-hospital procedures, indicating that routine application of novel therapeutic methods in patients with CA in teaching hospitals could translate into improved survival outcomes.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Heart Arrest/mortality , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Teaching/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Teaching/economics , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
14.
PLoS One ; 11(2): e0150214, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26913753

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While opioid use confers a known risk for respiratory depression, the incremental risk of in-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest, respiratory arrest, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPRA) has not been studied. Our aim was to investigate the prevalence, outcomes, and risk profile of in-hospital CPRA for patients receiving opioids and medications with central nervous system sedating side effects (sedatives). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of adult inpatient discharges from 2008-2012 reported in the Premier Database. Patients were grouped into four mutually exclusive categories: (1) opioids and sedatives, (2) opioids only, (3) sedatives only, and (4) neither opioids nor sedatives. RESULTS: Among 21,276,691 inpatient discharges, 53% received opioids with or without sedatives. A total of 96,554 patients suffered CPRA (0.92 per 1000 hospital bed-days). Patients who received opioids and sedatives had an adjusted odds ratio for CPRA of 3.47 (95% CI: 3.40-3.54; p<0.0001) compared with patients not receiving opioids or sedatives. Opioids alone and sedatives alone were associated with a 1.81-fold and a 1.82-fold (p<0.0001 for both) increase in the odds of CPRA, respectively. In opioid patients, locations of CPRA were intensive care (54%), general care floor (25%), and stepdown units (15%). Only 42% of patients survived CPRA and only 22% were discharged home. Opioid patients with CPRA had mean increased hospital lengths of stay of 7.57 days and mean increased total hospital costs of $27,569. CONCLUSIONS: Opioids and sedatives are independent and additive risk factors for in-hospital CPRA. The impact of opioid sparing analgesia, reduced sedative use, and better monitoring on CPRA incidence deserves further study.


Subject(s)
Analgesia/adverse effects , Analgesics, Opioid/adverse effects , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation/statistics & numerical data , Heart Arrest/chemically induced , Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Analgesia/methods , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Cost of Illness , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Hospital Records , Hospitalization , Humans , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk , Risk Factors , Young Adult
15.
Circulation ; 131(16): 1415-25, 2015 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25792560

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Regional variation in the incidence and outcomes of in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is not well studied and may have important health and policy implications. METHODS AND RESULTS: We used the 2003 to 2011 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify patients≥18 years of age who underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification procedure codes 99.60 and 99.63) for IHCA. Regional differences in IHCA incidence, survival to hospital discharge, and resource use (total hospital cost and discharge disposition among survivors) were analyzed. Of 838,465 patients with IHCA, 162,270 (19.4%) were in the Northeast, 159,581 (19.0%) were in the Midwest, 316,201 (37.7%) were in the South, and 200,413 (23.9%) were in the West. Overall IHCA incidence in the United States was 2.85 per 1000 hospital admissions. IHCA incidence was lowest in the Midwest and highest in the West (2.33 and 3.73 per 1000 hospital admissions, respectively). Compared with the Northeast, risk-adjusted survival to discharge was significantly higher in the Midwest (odds ratio, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.31-1.36), South (odds ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 1.19-1.23), and West (odds ratio, 1.25; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.27). IHCA survival increased significantly from 2003 to 2011 in the United States and in all regions (all Ptrend<0.001). Total hospital cost was highest in the West, whereas discharge to skilled nursing facility and use of home health care among survivors was highest in the Northeast. CONCLUSIONS: We observed significant regional variation in IHCA incidence, survival, and resource use in the United States. This variation was explained only partially by differences in patient and hospital characteristics. Further studies are needed to identify other potential factors responsible for these regional differences to improve outcomes after IHCA.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/epidemiology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Comorbidity , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/therapy , Home Care Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Costs , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals/classification , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Incidence , International Classification of Diseases , Male , Medicaid/statistics & numerical data , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Patient Admission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Skilled Nursing Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
16.
J Crit Care ; 30(2): 437.e7-14, 2015 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25454073

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation represents an emerging and recommended option to treat life-threatening cardiotoxicant poisoning. The objective of this cost-effectiveness analysis was to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of using venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for adults in cardiotoxicant-induced shock or cardiac arrest compared with standard care. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults in shock or in cardiac arrest secondary to cardiotoxicant poisoning were studied with a lifetime horizon and a societal perspective. Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cost effectiveness was calculated using a decision analysis tree, with the effect of the intervention and the probabilities used in the model taken from an observational study representing the highest level of evidence available. The costs (2013 Canadian dollars, where $1.00 Canadian = $0.9562 US dollars) were documented with interviews, reviews of official provincial documents, or published articles. A series of one-way sensitivity analyses and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis using Monte Carlo simulation were used to evaluate uncertainty in the decision model. RESULTS: The cost per life year (LY) gained in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group was $145 931/18 LY compared with $88 450/10 LY in the non-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation group. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio ($7185/LY but $34 311/LY using a more pessimistic approach) was mainly influenced by the probability of survival. The probabilistic sensitivity analysis identified variability in both cost and effectiveness. CONCLUSION: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may be cost effective in treating cardiotoxicant poisonings.


Subject(s)
Cardiotoxins/poisoning , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Health Care Costs , Heart Arrest/therapy , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Adult , Aged , Canada , Decision Support Techniques , Female , Heart Arrest/chemically induced , Heart Arrest/economics , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Monte Carlo Method , Shock, Cardiogenic/chemically induced , Shock, Cardiogenic/economics , Treatment Outcome
17.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 7(6): 889-95, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25351479

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Although an in-hospital cardiac arrest is common, little is known about readmission patterns and an inpatient resource use among survivors of an in-hospital cardiac arrest. METHODS AND RESULTS: Within a large national registry, we examined long-term inpatient use among 6972 adults aged ≥65 years who survived an in-hospital cardiac arrest. We examined 30-day and 1-year readmission rates and inpatient costs, overall and by patient demographics, hospital disposition (discharge destination), and neurological status at discharge. The mean age was 75.8±7.0 years, 56% were men, and 12% were black. There were a total of 2005 readmissions during the first 30 days (cumulative incidence rate, 35 readmissions/100 patients; 95% confidence interval, 33-37) and 8751 readmissions at 1 year (cumulative incidence rate, 185 readmissions/100 patients; 95% confidence interval, 177-190). Overall, mean inpatient costs were $7741±$2323 at 30 days and $18 629±$9411 at 1 year. Thirty-day inpatient costs were higher in patients of younger age (≥85 years, $6052 [reference]; 75-84 years, $7444 [adjusted cost ratio, 1.23; 1.06-1.42; 65-74 years, $8291 [adjusted cost ratio, 1.37; 1.19-1.59; both P<0.001) and black race (whites, $7413; blacks, $9044; adjusted cost ratio, 1.22; 1.05-1.42; P<0.001), as well as those discharged with severe neurological disability or to skilled nursing or rehabilitation facilities. These differences in resource use persisted at 1 year and were largely because of higher readmission rates. CONCLUSIONS: Survivors of an in-hospital cardiac arrest have frequent readmissions and high follow-up inpatient costs. Readmissions and inpatient costs were higher in certain subgroups, including patients of younger age and black race.


Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/economics , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Patient Readmission/economics , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate/trends , Survivors , United States/epidemiology
18.
Acad Emerg Med ; 17(6): 612-6, 2010 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20624141

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Care provided to patients who survive to hospital admission after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OOHCA) is sometimes viewed as expensive and a poor use of hospital resources. The objective was to describe financial parameters of care for patients resuscitated from OOHCA. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of OOHCA patients admitted to one academic teaching hospital from January 2004 to October 2007. Demographic data, length of stay (LOS), and discharge disposition were obtained for all patients. Financial parameters of patient care including total cost, net revenue, and operating margin were calculated by hospital cost accounting and reported as median and interquartile range (IQR). Groups were dichotomized by survival to discharge for subgroup analysis. To provide a reference group for context, similar financial data were obtained for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients admitted during the same time period, reported with medians and IQRs. RESULTS: During the study period, there were 72 admitted OOCHA patients and 404 STEMI patients. OOCHA and STEMI groups were similar for age, sex, and insurance type. Overall, 27 (38.6%) OOHCA patients survived to hospital discharge. Median LOS for OOHCA patients was 4 days (IQR = 1-8 days), with most of those hospitalized for

Subject(s)
Heart Arrest/economics , Hospital Costs , Myocardial Infarction/economics , Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation , Cost of Illness , Hospitals, Community , Humans , Length of Stay , Retrospective Studies , United States
19.
Resuscitation ; 81(8): 962-7, 2010 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20605311

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine whether automated external defibrillator (AED) use during resuscitation is associated with lower in-hospital health care costs. METHODS: For this observational prospective study, we included all treated out-of-hospital cardiac arrests of suspected cardiac cause. Clinical, survival and cost data were collected from July 2005 until March 2008. Cost data were based on hospital transport, duration of admission in hospital wards, diagnostics and interventions. We divided the study population in three groups based on AED use: (1) onsite AED, (2) dispatched AED, (3) no AED. The endpoint was survival to discharge. P<0.05 is indicated by *. RESULTS: Of the 2126 included patients, 136 were treated with an onsite AED, 365 with a dispatched AED and 1625 without AED. Overall (95% confidence interval [CI]) survival rate was 43% (35-51%), 16% (13-20%) and 14% (12-16%), respectively*. Per 100 survivors, the mean duration admitted at intensive care unit [ICU] were 267 (166-374), 495 (344-658), and 537 (450-609) days, respectively*; total duration of hospital admission was 2188 (1800-2594), 3132 (2573-3797), and 2765 (2519-3050) days, respectively*. Mean costs per survivor for hospital stay were euro9233 (euro7351-euro11,280), euro14,194 (euro11,656-euro17,254), and euro13,693 (euro12,226-euro15,166), respectively*; total health care costs were euro29,575 (euro24,695-euro34,183), euro34,533 (euro29,832-euro39,487) and euro31,772 (euro29,217-euro34,385), respectively. For both survivors and non-survivors, total costs per patient were euro14,727 (euro11,957-euro18,324), euro7703 (euro6141-euro9366) and euro6580 (euro5875-euro7238), respectively*. CONCLUSIONS: Onsite AED use was associated with higher survival rates. Surviving patients of the onsite AED group had lower total costs, mainly due to the shorter ICU stay.


Subject(s)
Automation , Electric Countershock/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Heart Arrest/mortality , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Inpatients , Patient Discharge/economics , Aged , Female , Heart Arrest/economics , Heart Arrest/therapy , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Netherlands , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Prospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...