Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 14 de 14
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12740783

ABSTRACT

Heart transplantation in children has been a relatively common practice for more than 15 years, and lung transplantation, while in use as a therapeutic modality for a shorter period of time, has 10 years of follow-up data for review. Because they are expensive, time-consuming, labor-intensive procedures, it is reasonable to review what has transpired to evaluate the effectiveness of these procedures, not only from the standpoint of survival, but in the applicability and availability to all who need it, and successful long-term outcomes including quality of life in those who receive it. Health care expense can be justified by improved results that reach expectations in the areas of applicability, availability, and survival. The applicability issue has, in large part, been achieved in transplantation in children. The goal of comprehensive availability can be met by providing alternatives to transplantation, advancing artificial organ research, and overhauling the organ donor programs to improve organ retrieval. To better meet expectations for survival, further advances in transplant immunology and solutions to the problems of post-transplant coronary artery disease and bronchiolitis obliterans will have to occur.


Subject(s)
Heart Transplantation/standards , Lung Transplantation/standards , Quality of Life , Child , Child, Preschool , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Female , Graft Rejection , Graft Survival , Heart Transplantation/economics , Heart Transplantation/mortality , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Heart-Lung Transplantation/mortality , Heart-Lung Transplantation/standards , Humans , Lung Transplantation/economics , Lung Transplantation/mortality , Male , Patient Selection , Prognosis , Quality of Health Care , Risk Assessment , Survival Analysis , United States
2.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 123(3): 411-8; discussion 418-20, 2002 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11882810

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to determine the cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained with lung transplantation relative to medical treatment for end-stage lung disease in the United Kingdom. METHODS: Patients on the transplant waiting list were used to represent medical treatment. Four-year national survival data were extrapolated to 15 years by means of parametric techniques. Quality-adjusted life-years were derived by means of utility scores obtained from a cross-section of patients. Resource consumption and costs were based on local and national sources. Costs and benefits were discounted at an annual rate of 6%. RESULTS: Across a 15-year period lung transplantation yielded mean benefits (relative to medical treatment) of 2.1, 3.3, and 3.6 quality-adjusted life-years for single-lung, double-lung, and heart-lung transplantation, respectively. During the same period the mean cost of medical treatment was estimated at $73,564, compared with $176,640, $180,528, and $178,387 for single-lung, double-lung, and heart-lung transplantation, respectively. The costs per quality-adjusted life-year gained were $48,241 for single-lung, $32,803 for double-lung, and $29,285 for heart-lung transplantation. Sensitivity analysis found the principal determinants of cost-effectiveness to be quality of life and maintenance costs after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: Lung transplantation results in survival and quality of life gains but remains expensive, with cost-effectiveness limited by substantial mortality and morbidity and high costs. The cost-effectiveness of lung transplantation can be improved with lowered immunosuppression costs and improvements in quality of life after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Lung Transplantation/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Humans , Life Expectancy , Lung Transplantation/methods , Lung Transplantation/mortality , United Kingdom
3.
Cardiol Young ; 11(3): 277-84, 2001 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11388621

ABSTRACT

We studied 10 boys, and 15 girls, all below the age of 16, who had been referred to the National Hospital in Norway for evaluation for transplantation of either the heart, or the heart and lungs. These represent the complete cohort of patients being considered for transplantation between 1990 and 1997. Of the 25 children and their families, 24 sets underwent a comprehensive psychosocial assessment, including interviews with both parents and their children. The parents completed the Child Behavior Checklist and the General Health Questionnaire. We had accepted 15 children for transplantation and placed them on the waiting list. The others were rejected for medical reasons, and 3 died whilst waiting for an organ. One was reconsidered for conventional surgery and removed from the list. Transplantation was performed in 11 children, whilst one of the patients we had rejected underwent transplantation abroad, and was included in the study. This left 12 patients in the final sample, with a mean age of 8 years, and with a range from 11 months to 13.9 years. We reassessed their psychosocial and physical functioning two years after transplantation. Of those undergoing transplantation of the heart and lungs, two were severely affected by progressive obliterative bronchiolitis. The others were in good general physical condition. At the assessment prior to transplantation, three already fulfilled the criterions for diagnosis of an overanxious disorder. Two others had symptoms of anxiety and depression, but without fulfilling the accepted criterions. At follow- up, two patients retained this psychiatric diagnosis. Increased levels of stress were uncovered in the parents prior to surgery, but these had normalised at follow-up. The study shows that, in general, physical and psychological conditions improve in children undergoing transplantation, but they and their parents live in a stressful environment, and are in need of psychosocial support both before and after transplantation.


Subject(s)
Child Welfare/psychology , Heart Transplantation/physiology , Heart Transplantation/psychology , Heart-Lung Transplantation/physiology , Heart-Lung Transplantation/psychology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child Welfare/economics , Child, Preschool , Family Health , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heart Transplantation/economics , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Humans , Infant , Insurance, Health , Male , Norway , Parents/psychology , Psychology/economics , Public Health , Surveys and Questionnaires
4.
Fed Regist ; 60(22): 6537-47, 1995 Feb 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-10141401

ABSTRACT

This notice announces a Medicare national coverage decision for lung and heart-lung transplantations. Lung transplantation refers to the transplantation of one or both lungs from a single cadaver donor. Heart-lung transplantation refers to the transplantation of one or both lungs and the heart from a single cadaver donor. We have determined that, under certain circumstances, lung transplants and heart-lung transplants are a medically reasonable and necessary service when furnished to patients with progressive end-stage pulmonary or cardiopulmonary disease and when furnished by Medicare participating facilities that meet specific criteria, including patient selection criteria. DATES: This notice is effective February 2, 1995. For information on how this notice effects Medicare payment for lung and heart-lung transplants, see sections E and F of this notice.


Subject(s)
Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Lung Transplantation/economics , Medicare/legislation & jurisprudence , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Data Collection , Facility Regulation and Control , Health Expenditures , Heart-Lung Transplantation/standards , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement , Lung Transplantation/standards , Patient Selection , United States
6.
Ann Surg ; 218(4): 465-73; discussion 474-5, 1993 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8215638

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Using lung transplantation as a case study, this article addressed the problem of supporting innovative clinical surgery in an era of increasing pressures for cost containment. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: After sporadic attempts at lung transplantation during the 1960s and 1970s, its clinical development began in earnest during the early 1980s. As a result of a wide range of incremental advances, the results have improved significantly. The Health Care Financing Administration, however, has not yet issued a national policy covering lung transplants and has left the coverage decision to the discretion of its regional contractors. METHODS: The authors surveyed the major commercial insurers, the Blue Cross Blue Shield Association, and a sample of Medicare intermediaries to evaluate the coverage of lung transplantation. They also interviewed the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and industrial firms about their support for clinical research. RESULTS: Government and industry funding were limited, and the development and assessment of lung transplants have been financed predominantly by academic institutions through cross-subsidization from patient care and teaching funds. The major private payers and Blue Cross Blue Shield decided to cover this procedure in the early 1990s. Coverage decisions by Medicare intermediaries, however, revealed considerable variability. Moreover, the absence of a specific diagnosis-related group for lung transplants had considerable consequences for institutions in all-payer states, in which payments appeared to be considerably lower than the mean costs of a transplant procedure (about $110,000). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicated that there was a growing disparity between the increasing demand for outcomes data about new procedures and the limited resources available for supporting the development and assessment of new operations. It this disparity is not addressed, the rate of surgical innovation may be jeopardized, and timely outcomes data may not be acquired. It was concluded that provisional coverage within a predetermined research protocol may be a promising mechanism to remedy this situation, providing timely assessment of new procedures before widespread application.


Subject(s)
General Surgery , Insurance, Surgical , Lung Transplantation/economics , Research Support as Topic , Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S. , Diffusion of Innovation , Health Care Costs , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Heart-Lung Transplantation/trends , Humans , Lung Transplantation/trends , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/economics , United States
7.
JAMA ; 269(24): 3113-8; discussion 3155-6, 1993.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8505813

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the billed charges for organ procurement and to consider the role of financial incentives to encourage organ donation. DESIGN: Observational study. Data were obtained on donor organ acquisition charges from a random sample of kidney, heart, liver, heart-lung, and pancreas transplants. SETTING: The data were based on 28.7% of all transplants performed in the United States in 1988. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Total charges for donor organ acquisition. RESULTS: The median charges (1988 dollars) for donor organs were as follows: kidney, $12,290; heart, $12,578; liver, $16,281; heart-lung, $12,028; and pancreas, $15,400. Since 1983, kidney acquisition charges have increased by 12.9%, heart charges by 64.1%, and liver charges by 61.8%, after adjusting for inflation. Between 9% and 31% of total transplant procedure-specific charges were associated with donor organ acquisition. CONCLUSIONS: There is wide unexplained variation in organ procurement charges. Data on actual costs are required to establish the appropriateness of current charges. Prevailing billing and payment methods should be reevaluated in an effort to address a variety of issues related to reimbursement. Current payment methods may actually contribute to cost inefficiency. Finally, while financial incentives may enhance the efficiency of organ procurement efforts, they will adversely affect the cost-effectiveness of transplantation.


Subject(s)
Human Body , Tissue Donors/supply & distribution , Tissue and Organ Procurement/economics , Altruism , Costs and Cost Analysis , Federal Government , Fees and Charges/statistics & numerical data , Heart Transplantation/economics , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Humans , Kidney Transplantation/economics , Liver Transplantation/economics , Medicare/statistics & numerical data , Pancreas Transplantation/economics , Reimbursement, Incentive , Resource Allocation , Tissue and Organ Procurement/organization & administration , United States
8.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 105(6): 972-8, 1993 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-8501947

ABSTRACT

Rarely has the cost of heart-lung transplantation received attention. Although the procedure is still largely regarded as experimental, this does not diminish the significance of costs. The National Cooperative Transplantation Study was undertaken to better understand the costs of all transplants, including heart-lung transplantation. Data on transplantation charges from date of procedure to discharge were obtained from more than 65% of all heart-lung transplantation programs active in 1988. These programs accounted for 61% of all transplantations performed in 1988. Valid sample survey data (no more than 25 procedures per center) were obtained for 42 patients, or approximately 58% of all procedures done in the United States. Detailed data were also collected on sources of payment and amount reimbursed. Because of outlier data, we report statistical medians, rather than means, as our measure of central tendency. The median charge for heart-lung transplantation was $134,881, with an average hospital stay of 31 days. Total charges fell between $99,535 and $216,639 for 50% of the cases studied. Half of the patients spent between 23 and 49 days in the hospital. Because of the small number of cases available for analysis, it was not meaningful to cross-classify the data according to various prognostic variables. More than 78% of the procedures studied were paid for by private insurers. Reimbursement exceeded 90% of billed charges for 84.6% of the cases analyzed. Despite the experimental status of heart-lung transplantation, insurance reimbursement has been favorable for those heart-lung transplantations that insurers have covered. Nevertheless, the future of heart-lung transplantation is unclear. The availability of donors remains a serious constraint, as is seen in the decrease of procedures performed annually. In fact, lung transplantation now appears to be the preferred approach to the treatment of pulmonary disease.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Fees and Charges , Heart-Lung Transplantation/standards , Humans , Insurance, Health, Reimbursement/economics , United States
10.
Transplant Proc ; 24(5): 2007-8, 1992 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1412950

ABSTRACT

1. A National Transplantation Service has been established at the Alfred Hospital performing more than 50 transplants per year. 2. Increased access to transplantation technology has facilitated an improvement in national population servicing from 2.7 to 6.2 transplants per million population per year. National funding of A$4.062 million per year has been secured. 3. Basic research into organ preservation has facilitated transcontinental organ procurement. 4. An active lung transplantation program has been established synchronous with the cardiac transplant service activities. 5. MCS program establishment has paralleled clinical transplantation activities. 6. Budget management and cost containment has been achieved through rationalisation of management protocols.


Subject(s)
Heart-Lung Transplantation , Australia , Costs and Cost Analysis , Developing Countries , Heart-Assist Devices , Heart-Lung Transplantation/economics , Humans , Organ Preservation , Tissue and Organ Procurement
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...