Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 25
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35994409

ABSTRACT

Heel spur is a chronic inflammatory condition causing pain and other typical symptoms. Therapeutic recommendations include the use of several drug or orthotic/physical therapies, performed alone or in combination. Surgery is usually reserved for refractory conditions. Radiotherapy has been shown to ensure good clinical outcomes in this clinical setting. A systematic review was performed to describe the feasibility and effectiveness of radiotherapy in the treatment of heel spur, evaluating its role in alleviating pain and consequently ensuring a better quality of life. A case report of 45-year-old patient treated for refractary right hindfoot pain was reported. A single fraction of 6 Gy RT was delivered with symptomatic complete response at 2 months observed. A systematic database search was conducted according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. The systematic review included studies describing heel spur treatment and providing complete information about radiotherapy. Fifteen articles published between 1996 and 2020 were reviewed. Study characteristic analysis resulted in seven prospective randomized studies and eight retrospective studies. Radiotherapy of painful heel spur seems to be safe and effective, with high response rates even at low doses and with an overall favorable toxicity profile. Predictive parameters and modern tailored treatment should be investigated with further studies.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies
2.
Eur J Med Res ; 27(1): 28, 2022 Feb 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35197107

ABSTRACT

AIM: Plantar enthesophyte is a common degenerative disorder. Surgical and medical treatment options are associated with either poor outcome or high percentage of relapse. Observations have indicated a beneficial effect of radiation therapy. We therefore wanted to evaluate pain reduction using orthovolt or cobalt-based radiation treatment for painful plantar enthesophyte and determine long-term response as well as prognostic parameters in this condition. METHODS: We identified a total of 102 consecutive patients treated for a total of 117 symptomatic heel spurs. 59 patients were treated with cobalt radiation, 31 patients with orthovolt therapy and 12 patients with both radiation systems. Primary outcome measure was pain reduction being scored using the modified Rowe Score prior therapy, at the end of each treatment series as well as after 6 weeks. Secondary outcome measure was long-term outcome, evaluated in patients with a follow-up period of longer than 3 years. RESULTS: Before radiation therapy, 61 patients (60.4%) had a score of 0, significant strong pain. At the time of completion of radiation treatment, 3 patients (2.7%) were pain-free (score of 30), whereas 8 patients (7.9%) had still severe pain (score 0). 6 weeks after radiation therapy, 33 patients (32.7%) were pain-free and 8 patients (7.9%) had severe pain (score 0), while at the time data of collection, 74 patients (73%) were free of pain and 1 patient (1%) had strong pain (score 0). Duration of pain before the start of radiation treatment was a significant prognostic factor (p = 0.012) for response to treatment. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy of painful plantar enthesophyte is a highly effective therapy with little side effects providing long-term therapeutic response. The only significant prognostic parameter for response to treatment is the duration of pre-radiation therapy pain. Early integration of radiation therapy in the treatment seems to result in superior pain reduction.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Pain Measurement/methods , Pain/etiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heel Spur/complications , Heel Spur/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Prognosis , Radiography , Radiotherapy Dosage , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
3.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 197(10): 876-884, 2021 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33502569

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To estimate the long-term effect of low-dose radiotherapy of painful plantar calcaneal spurs, and to verify possible prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective unicenter study, electronic patient files of patients with painful plantar calcaneal spurs treated with low-dose radiotherapy between July 2009 and February 2020 were reviewed. The low-dose radiotherapy consisted of a total dose of 3.0 Gy given with a fraction dose of 0.5 Gy three times a week. The pain reduction was estimated using a patient questionnaire with a visual analogue scale. Kaplan-Meier statistics and Cox regression analysis were used for the statistical analysis. RESULTS: Altogether, 864 heels of 666 patients were reviewed. The probability of an insufficient pain control 10 years after low-dose radiotherapy was 45.9% (95% confidence interval 39.4-52.4%) in the subset of patients with a minimum follow-up of 3 months (582 heels of 467 patients). Patients with an unsatisfactory pain reduction 3 months after low-dose radiotherapy were offered a re-irradiation. Forty percent of the patients who received a re-irradiation developed good pain reduction. Occurrence of an initial aggravation of pain during or within 3 months after low-dose radiotherapy (p = 0.005), and treatment of bilateral painful plantar calcaneal spurs (p = 0.008) were identified as significant unfavorable prognostic factors on univariate analysis. On multivariate analysis, the initial aggravation of pain remained as independent significant prognostic factor (p = 0.01). No clear radiation toxicity was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Low-dose radiotherapy is a safe and effective treatment option for patients with painful plantar calcaneal spurs. An initial aggravation of pain during or within 3 months after radiotherapy was identified as unfavorable prognostic factor for the treatment outcome. Re-irradiation of patients with an unsatisfactory pain reduction after low-dose radiotherapy is effective and should be offered to patients.


Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Plantar , Heel Spur , Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Humans , Pain Measurement , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
4.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 196(12): 1116-1127, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32651595

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Biodosimetric assessment and comparison of radiation-induced deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) double-strand breaks (DSBs) by γH2AX immunostaining in peripheral leukocytes of patients with painful heel spur after radiation therapy (RT) with orthovoltage X­rays or a 6-MV linear accelerator (linac). The treatment response for each RT technique was monitored as a secondary endpoint. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 22 patients were treated either with 140-kV orthovoltage X­rays (n = 11) or a 6-MV linac (n = 11) with two weekly fractions of 0.5 Gy for 3 weeks. In both scenarios, the dose was prescribed to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU) dose reference point. Blood samples were obtained before and 30 min after the first RT session. γH2AX foci were quantified by immunofluorescence microscopy to assess the yield of DSBs at the basal level and after radiation exposure ex vivo or in vivo. The treatment response was assessed before and 3 months after RT using a five-level functional calcaneodynia score. RESULTS: RT for painful heel spurs induced a very mild but significant increase of γH2AX foci in patients' leukocytes. No difference between the RT techniques was observed. High and comparable therapeutic responses were documented for both treatment modalities. This trial was terminated preliminarily after an interim analysis (22 patients randomized). CONCLUSION: Low-dose RT for painful heel spurs with orthovoltage X­rays or a 6-MV linac is an effective treatment option associated with a very low and comparable radiation burden to the patient, as confirmed by biodosimetric measurements.


Subject(s)
DNA Breaks, Double-Stranded/radiation effects , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Leukocytes/radiation effects , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Female , Histones/analysis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Particle Accelerators/instrumentation , Radiotherapy/instrumentation , Radiotherapy Dosage
5.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 186(2-3): 386-390, 2019 Dec 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31840171

ABSTRACT

About 26 000 patients are treated per year with radiotherapy for non-malignant diseases in the Czech Republic. Approximately 75% of them are treated on X-ray therapy units and most of these patients undergo radiotherapy of heel spurs. The evaluation of radiation exposure of these patients was based on measured organ doses and on data from clinical practice. Collective effective doses for particular diagnoses were calculated in order to compare doses resulting from different diagnoses treated on X-ray therapy units. The collective effective dose from radiotherapy of heel spurs in the Czech Republic in 2013 was evaluated to 77 manSv. It represents 25.6% of the total collective effective dose for all diagnoses of radiotherapy for non-malignant diseases treated on X-ray therapy units.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiation Exposure/analysis , Radiation Monitoring/methods , Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted/methods , X-Ray Therapy/methods , Czech Republic , Humans , Male , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiotherapy Dosage
6.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 193(6): 483-490, 2017 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28243722

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In this randomized multicenter trial, we compared the effect of a lower single dose of 0.5 Gy vs. a standard single dose of 1 Gy concerning pain relief and quality of life, while maintaining a uniform total dose of 6 Gy. On the basis of laboratory observations, the lower single dose would be expected to be more effective. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 127 patients suffering from painful heel spur were randomized: Patients in the standard group were treated with single fractions of 6 × 1 Gy twice a week, while the experimental group was treated with single fractions of 12 × 0.5 Gy three times a week. Patients who did not show satisfactory pain relief after 12 weeks were offered re-irradiation with the standard dose. The study's primary endpoints were pain relief and quality of life. Therapy results were evaluated and compared based on follow-up examinations after 12 and 48 weeks. RESULTS: The data of 117 patients could be evaluated. There was no significant difference between the groups concerning the results of a visual analogue scale (VAS), Calcaneodynia Score (CS), and the somatic scale of the 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey(SF-12). Patients undergoing re-irradiation showed a significant benefit concerning pain relief. Their total outcome was comparable to patients showing a good response from the beginning. No relevant acute or chronic side effects were recorded. CONCLUSION: Both patient groups showed good results concerning pain relief. A fractionation schedule of 12 × 0.5 Gy was not superior to the current standard dose of 6 × 1 Gy. Further trials are necessary to explore the best fractionation schedule.


Subject(s)
Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Pain/radiotherapy , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement/radiation effects , Particle Accelerators , Quality of Life/psychology , Radiotherapy Dosage
8.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 25(2): 387-9, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24838575

ABSTRACT

AIMS AND BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to investigate the use of low-dose radiotherapy (RT) in benign painful heel spur management. METHODS: Between the years of 2009 and 2012, in Gulhane Military Medical Academy Radiation Oncology Department, patients with heel spur undergoing radiotherapy for pain relief were analyzed retrospectively. In the evaluation of treatment response, Verbal Numeric Scale (VNS) scoring method was used to compare the pain status before and after radiotherapy. Age, gender, laterality, VNS score before RT, VNS score after RT, RT doses of the patients and patients undergoing second course of radiotherapy were recorded. All patients received 8 Gy RT in two fractions with Co-60 teletherapy machine. Statistical Package for Social Sciences, version 16.0 was used for data analysis with the level of significance set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: The total number of patients receiving RT for heel spur pain was 450. Median age was 52 years (range 40-85 years). Two hundred and ninety-two (65%) of the patients were women and 158 (35%) were men. Radiologically calcaneal spurs were bilateral in 432 (96%) patients, whereas unilateral left in 8 (1.8%) patients and unilateral right heel location in 10 (2.2%) patients. Ten (2.2%) of the patient group received second course of RT due to refractory pain. Comparative evaluation of VNS scores before and after RT revealed statistically significant pain relief by radiotherapy (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Low-dose radiotherapy is an effective and reliable painkilling treatment method that can be used in the treatment of epin calcanei refractory to medical and surgical treatment.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Musculoskeletal Pain/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Heel Spur/complications , Heel Spur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Musculoskeletal Pain/etiology , Pain Measurement , Pain, Intractable/radiotherapy , Radiography , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retrospective Studies
9.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 190(3): 298-303, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24452814

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Painful heel spur syndrome is a common disease with a lifetime prevalence of approximately 10 %. One of the most effective treatment options is radiotherapy. Many authors recommend a second or third series of radiation for recurrent pain and partial or no response to the initial treatment. As the results of re-irradiation have not been systematically analyzed the aim of this study was to document the results of repeated radiation treatment and to identify patients who could benefit from this treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The analysis was performed on patients from 2 German radiotherapy institutions and included 101 re-irradiated heels. Pain was documented with the numeric rating scale (NRS) and carried out before and directly after each radiation therapy as well as for the follow-up period of 24 months. The median age of the patients was 56 years with 30.1 % male and 69.9 % female patients. Pain was caused by plantar fasciitis in 72.3 %, Haglund's exostosis in 15.8 % and Achilles tendinitis in 11.9 %. Repeated radiation was indicated because the initial radiotherapy resulted in no response in 35.6 % of patients, partial response in 39.6 % and recurrent pain in 24.8 %. RESULTS: A significant response to re-irradiation could be found. For the whole sample the median NRS pain score was 6 before re-irradiation, 2 after 6 weeks and 0 after 12 and 24 months. Of the patients 73.6 % were free of pain 24 months after re-irradiation. All subgroups, notably those with no response, partial response and recurrent pain had a significant reduction of pain. CONCLUSION: Re-irradiation of painful heel spur syndrome is an effective and safe treatment. All subgroups showed a good response to re-irradiation for at least 24 months.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Achilles Tendon , Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Female , Heel Spur/etiology , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Retreatment , Retrospective Studies , Tendinopathy/radiotherapy , Treatment Outcome
10.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 87(5): 1122-8, 2013 Dec 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24120823

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiation therapy is well established in the treatment of painful plantar fasciitis or heel spur. A retrospective analysis was conducted to investigate the effect of field definition on treatment outcome and to determine the impact of factors potentially involved. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A review of treatment data of 250 patients (285 heels) with a mean follow-up time of 11 months showed that complete symptom remission occurred in 38%, partial remission in 32%, and no change in 19% (11% were lost to follow-up). Variables such as radiologic evidence of plantar spurs, their length, radiation dose, field size, age, sex, and onset of pain before administration of radiation therapy were investigated in univariate and multivariate regression analyses. RESULTS: Treatment response depended upon age >53 years, length of heel spur ≤6.5 mm (or no radiologic evidence of a heel spur), and onset of pain <12 months before radiation therapy. Patients with these clinical prerequisites stood a 93% chance of clinical response. Without these prerequisites, only 49% showed any impact. No influence of field size on treatment outcome became evident. CONCLUSION: Patients with short plantar heel spurs benefit from radiation therapy equally well as patients without any radiologic evidence. Moreover, smaller field sizes have the same positive effect as commonly used large field definitions covering the entire calcaneal bone. This leads to a recommendation of a considerable reduction of field size in future clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Fasciitis, Plantar/diagnostic imaging , Female , Heel Spur/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain/radiotherapy , Radiography , Radiotherapy Dosage , Regression Analysis , Remission Induction/methods , Retrospective Studies , Statistics, Nonparametric , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , Young Adult
11.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys ; 84(4): e455-62, 2012 Nov 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22836057

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To conduct a randomized trial of radiation therapy for painful heel spur, comparing a standard dose with a very low dose. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Sixty-six patients were randomized to receive radiation therapy either with a total dose of 6.0 Gy applied in 6 fractions of 1.0 Gy twice weekly (standard dose) or with a total dose of 0.6 Gy applied in 6 fractions of 0.1 Gy twice weekly (low dose). In all patients lateral opposing 4- to 6-MV photon beams were used. The results were measured using a visual analogue scale, the Calcaneodynia score, and the SF12 health survey. The fundamental phase of the study ended after 3 months, and the follow-up was continued up to 1 year. Patients with insufficient pain relief after 3 months were offered reirradiation with the standard dosage at any time afterward. RESULTS: Of 66 patients, 4 were excluded because of withdrawal of consent or screening failures. After 3 months the results in the standard arm were highly significantly superior compared with those in the low-dose arm (visual analogue scale, P=.001; Calcaneodynia score, P=.027; SF12, P=.045). The accrual of patients was stopped at this point. Further evaluation after 12 months' follow-up showed the following results: (1) highly significant fewer patients were reirradiated in the standard arm compared with the low-dose arm (P<.001); (2) the results of patients in the low-dose arm who were reirradiated were identical to those in the standard arm not reirradiated (reirradiation as a salvage therapy if the lower dose was ineffective); (3) patients experiencing a favorable result after 3 months showed this even after 12 months, and some results even improved further between 3 and 12 months. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirms the superior analgesic effect of radiation therapy with 6-Gy doses on painful heel spur even for a longer time period of at least 1 year.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Follow-Up Studies , Germany , Humans , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement/methods , Photons/therapeutic use , Prospective Studies , Quality of Life , Retreatment/methods , Retreatment/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
14.
Br J Radiol ; 80(958): 829-34, 2007 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17875593

ABSTRACT

Plantar fasciitis is a common painful syndrome that is usually treated by irradiation with a fraction dose (fd) of 1 Gy up to a total dose (TD) of 6 Gy according to clinical experience. By analysing our experiences with numerous former patients, we have attempted to find the relationship between dose and effect. To evaluate the effectiveness of radiotherapy and assess the impact of fd and TD in plantar fasciitis radiotherapy, we assessed 1624 irradiations (856 patients) performed using a fd of 1-3 Gy and a TD of 1-45 Gy. Analysis was carried out on the 623 irradiations (327 patients) for which complete follow-up data were available. The mean follow-up period was 74 months. The following parameters were evaluated: pain relief level; period of anaesthetic effect preservation after treatment; presence of pain and the timing of its appearance; and the intake of analgesic drugs at the last follow-up. After treatment, 48% of the patients reported a lack of pain, 21% reported pain relief greater than 50% and 17% reported pain relief less than 50%. The mean pain relief duration was 72 months. The last follow-up found that pain at rest afflicted 25% of the patients, and pain during walking afflicted 32%. A dose-effect relationship was not found. In conclusion, radiotherapy is an effective treatment for plantar fasciitis. A fd of 1.5 Gy and TD of 9 Gy should probably not be exceeded.


Subject(s)
Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Pain/radiotherapy , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
15.
Acta Oncol ; 46(2): 239-46, 2007.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17453376

ABSTRACT

A total of 502 patients treated between 1990 and 2002 with low-dose radiotherapy (RT) for painful heel spurs were analysed for prognostic factors for long-term treatment success. The median follow-up was 26 months, ranging from 1 to 103 months. Events were defined as (1) slightly improved or unchanged pain after therapy, or (2) recurrent pain sensations during the follow-up period. Overall 8-year event-free probability was 60.9%. Event-free probabilities of patients with one/two series (414/88) were 69.7%/32.2% (p<0.001); >58/ < or = 58 years (236/266), 81.3%/47.9% (p=0.001); high voltage/orthovoltage (341/161), 67.9%/60.6% (p=0.019); pain anamnesis < or = 6 months/ >6 months (308/194), 76.3%/43.9% (p=0.001); single dose 0.5/1.0 Gy (100/401), 86.2%/55.1% (p=0.009); without/with prior treatment (121/381), 83.1%/54.9% (p=0.023); men/women (165/337), 61.2%/61.5% (p=0.059). The multivariate Cox regression analysis with inclusion of the number of treatment series, age, photon energy, pain history, single-dose and prior treatments revealed patients with only one treatment series (p<0.001), an age >58 years (p=0.011) and therapy with high voltage photons (p=0.050) to be significant prognostic factors for pain relief. Overall low-dose RT is a very effective treatment in painful heel spurs.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/diagnosis , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
16.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 183(1): 3-9, 2007 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17225939

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy of two different dose-fractionation schedules for radiation therapy (RT) in patients with painful heel spurs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 130 patients were randomized into two groups: the low-dose (LD) group (n = 65 heels) received a total dose of 3.0 Gy given in two weekly fractions of 0.5 Gy; in the high-dose (HD) group (n = 65 heels), two weekly fractions of 1.0 Gy were applied over 3 weeks (total dose 6.0 Gy). In 24 sites of the HD group and 17 sites of the LD group, a second RT course was given. The results were assessed using a five-level function score which was documented before RT, at the end of each RT course, and at 6 weeks and 6 months thereafter. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, RT led to a highly significant reduction of symptoms in both groups. In the HD group, 31 sites were classified as excellent (score: 90-100), 13 as good (score: 70-85), twelve as moderate (score: 45-65), and nine as poor (score: 0-40). In the LD group, 35 sites were classified as excellent, eight as good, ten as moderate, and twelve as poor. The comparison of the difference of the sum score and the single criteria before RT and at 6 months after RT using the Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-test revealed no statistically significant difference of response to RT between both groups. CONCLUSION: RT is an effective treatment option for the management of inflammatory heel spurs. The dose for an RT course should not exceed 3.0 Gy.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Female , Heel Spur/diagnosis , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain Measurement/radiation effects , Treatment Outcome
17.
Lik Sprava ; (5-6): 97-100, 2007.
Article in Ukrainian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18418927

ABSTRACT

The author studied the influence of physical factors of electrophoresis with acetic acid, massage and laseropuncture in sanatorium conditions where 28 patients with heeling spurs have been treated. The patients in a control group (n=25) received a traditional treatment - an injection of hydrocortisone in area of heeling spurs, skin rubbing with herbs (tincture with different flowers, elder-berry buds. Efficiency of a proposed medical complex was shown using clinical and radiographic data.


Subject(s)
Acetic Acid/administration & dosage , Health Resorts , Heel Spur/rehabilitation , Low-Level Light Therapy , Massage , Adult , Combined Modality Therapy , Electrophoresis , Female , Heel Spur/diagnostic imaging , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Radiography , Treatment Outcome
18.
Strahlenther Onkol ; 182(12): 733-9, 2006 Dec.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17149581

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate results on the functional outcome and to determine prognostic factors and long-term response to low-dose megavoltage irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total dose of 6.0 Gy given in two weekly fractions of 1.0 Gy was applied to 305 sites (252 patients). After 6 weeks, 97 sites (31.8%) received a second radiotherapy (RT) course. Assessment system was a function score which was documented before RT, at the end of each RT course, and at 6 weeks and 6 months after treatment. After an observation period of >/= 24 months, a follow-up examination was attempted to evaluate the late response. RESULTS: At 6-month follow-up, 85.6% responded with a score improvement. The outcome was excellent (score: 90-100) in 135/305 sites (44.3%), good (score: 70-85) in 60/305 sites (19.7%), moderate (score: 45-65) in 63/305 (20.7%) sites, and poor (score: 0-40) in 47/305 sites (15.4%). 231/305 sites (75.7%) had no or mild pain. 296/305 (97,0%) had no or only slight limitations in work and 253/305 (82,9%) in daily activities. 255/305 (83,6%) had no or slight discomfort in gait. The long-term follow-up after a mean observation period of 48.4 months revealed 15 recurrences (7.3%). The patients' age, sex, and the duration of symptoms before initiation of RT ( 6 months) did not prove to be prognostic factors. No early or late toxicity related to the use of RT was detected. CONCLUSION: Megavoltage 6-MV photon-beam irradiation is a safe, effective and long-acting treatment modality in the management of heel spur patients. The function score has been proven to be a feasible method in clinical practice for evaluation of treatment outcome.


Subject(s)
Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Radiotherapy, High-Energy , Activities of Daily Living/classification , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disability Evaluation , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Patient Satisfaction , Photons/therapeutic use , Radiotherapy Dosage , Retreatment , Treatment Outcome
19.
Radiat Med ; 24(8): 573-6, 2006 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17041794

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Radiotherapy is a nonsurgical alternative therapy of painful heel spur patients. Nonetheless, cancer induction is the most important somatic effect of ionizing radiation. This study was designed to evaluate the carcinogenesis risk factor in benign painful heel spur patients treated by radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between 1974 and 1999, a total of 20 patients received mean 8.16 Gy total irradiation dose in two fractions. Thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLD(100)) were placed on multiple phantom sites in vivo within the irradiated volume to verify irradiation accuracy and carcinogenesis risk factor calculation. The 20 still-alive patients, who had a minimum 5-year and maximum 29-year follow-up (mean 11.9 years), have been evaluated by carcinogenic radiation risk factor on the basis of tissue weighting factors as defined by the International Commission on Radiological Protection Publication 60. RESULTS: Reasonable pain relief has been obtained in all 20 patients. The calculated mean carcinogenesis risk factor is 1.3% for radiation portals in the whole group, and no secondary cancer has been clinically observed. CONCLUSION: Radiotherapy is an effective treatment modality for relieving pain in calcaneal spur patients. The estimated secondary cancer risk factor for irradiation of this benign lesion is not as high as was feared.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/etiology , Heel Spur/radiotherapy , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/etiology , Whole-Body Irradiation/adverse effects , Adult , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/epidemiology , Calcaneus/pathology , Calcaneus/radiation effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation , Fasciitis, Plantar/complications , Fasciitis, Plantar/radiotherapy , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Heel Spur/complications , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/etiology , Pain/radiotherapy , Phantoms, Imaging , Radiotherapy Dosage , Risk Factors , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thermoluminescent Dosimetry , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...