A Rapid and Facile Purification Method for Glycan-Binding Proteins and Glycoproteins.

Glycosylated proteins, namely glycoproteins and proteoglycans (collectively called glycoconjugates), are indispensable in a variety of biological processes. The functions of many glycoconjugates are regulated by their interactions with another group of proteins known as lectins. In order to understand the biological functions of lectins and their glycosylated binding partners, one must obtain these proteins in pure form. The conventional protein purification methods often require long times, elaborate infrastructure, costly reagents, and large sample volumes. To minimize some of these problems, we recently developed and validated a new method termed capture and release (CaRe). This method is time-saving, precise, inexpensive, and it needs a relatively small sample volume. In this approach, targets (lectins and glycoproteins) are captured in solution by multivalent ligands called target capturing agents (TCAs). The captured targets are then released and separated from their TCAs to obtain purified targets. Application of the CaRe method could play an important role in discovering new lectins and glycoconjugates. © 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC. Basic Protocol 1: Preparation of crude extracts containing the target proteins from soybean flour Alternate Protocol 1: Preparation of crude extracts from Jack bean meal Alternate Protocol 2: Preparation of crude extracts from the corms of Colocasia esculenta, Xanthosoma sagittifolium, and from the bulbs of Allium sativum Alternate Protocol 3: Preparation of Escherichia coli cell lysates containing human galectin-3 Alternate Protocol 4: Preparation of crude extracts from chicken egg whites (source of ovalbumin) Basic Protocol 2: Preparation of 2% (v/v) red blood cell suspension Basic Protocol 3: Detection of lectin activity of the crude extracts Basic Protocol 4: Identification of multivalent inhibitors as target capturing agents by hemagglutination inhibition assays Basic Protocol 5: Testing the capturing abilities of target capturing agents by precipitation/turbidity assays Basic Protocol 6: Capturing of targets (lectins and glycoproteins) in the crude extracts by target capturing agents and separation of the target-TCA complex from other components of the crude extracts Basic Protocol 7: Releasing the captured targets (lectins and glycoproteins) by dissolving the complex Basic Protocol 8: Separation of the targets (lectins and glycoproteins) from their respective target capturing agents Basic Protocol 9: Verification of the purity of the isolated targets (lectins or glycoproteins).

A novel simple assay system for the detection of human platelet antigen 15 (HPA-15) alloantibodies based on three techniques: an HPA-15 expressing cell line, a monoclonal antibody-specific antigen-capture method and mixed-passive haemagglutination.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To detect HPA-15 alloantibodies, we previously developed a human platelet antigen 15 (HPA-15)-expressing cell line-based modified rapid monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigen (CL-MR-MAIPA) assay. In this study, the protocol was modified for easier performance by introducing the mixed-passive haemagglutination (MPHA) principle. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 20 samples that tested negative for HPA alloantibodies and eight that tested positive for HPA-15 alloantibodies (two and six positive for HPA-15a and HPA-15b antibodies, respectively) by CL-MR-MAIPA assay were used in this study. HPA-15 cell lines were incubated with serum/plasma and then solubilized. The lysate was transferred to a round-bottom well, which was coated with anti-human CD109 monoclonal antibodies. After incubation and repeated washings, sheep red blood cells, coated with anti-human IgG, were added to the wells. Haemagglutination was assessed the next day. RESULTS: The proposed cell line-based immune complex capture-dependent mixed-passive haemagglutination (CL-IC-MPHA) assay consisted of four steps, but required only 2 h to perform, except for overnight incubation for haemagglutination. Two HPA-15a alloantibody samples were reactive only for HPA-15a cells, and six HPA-15b alloantibody samples were reactive only for HPA-15b cells with the CL-IC-MPHA assay. The 20 samples that tested negative for HPA alloantibodies did not react with HPA-15a or HPA-15b cells. These data indicated that the CL-IC-MPHA assay was highly specific and sensitive. Unfortunately, the CL-IC-MPHA assay's analytic sensitivity was twofold to eightfold lower than that of the CL-MR-MAIPA assay. CONCLUSION: A novel, easy-to-perform protocol was successfully developed to detect HPA-15 alloantibodies with high specificity and sensitivity.

Diagnostic Performances of Commercial ELISA, Indirect Hemagglutination, and Western Blot in Differentiation of Hepatic Echinococcal and Non-Echinococcal Lesions: A Retrospective Analysis of Data from a Single Referral Centre.

The diagnosis of cystic echinococcosis (CE) is based on imaging. Serology supports imaging in suspected cases, but no consensus exists on the algorithm to apply when imaging is inconclusive. We performed a retrospective analysis of serology results of patients with untreated hepatic CE and non-CE lesions, seen from 2005 to 2017, to evaluate their accuracy in the differential diagnosis of hepatic CE. Serology results of three seroassays for echinococcosis (ELISA RIDASCREEN, indirect hemagglutination (IHA) Cellognost, and Western blot LDBIO) and clinical characteristics of eligible patients were retrieved. Patients were grouped as having active or inactive CE and liquid or solid non-CE lesions. Sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy were compared between scenarios encompassing different test combinations. Eligible patients included 104 patients with CE and 257 with non-CE lesions. Sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy of Western blot (WB) were significantly higher than those of the following: 1) IHA or ELISA alone, 2) IHA+ELISA interpreted as positive if both or either tests positive, and 3) IHA+ELISA confirmed by WB if discordant. The best performances were obtained when WB was applied on discordant or concordant negative IHA+ELISA. Analyses performed within "active CE (n = 52) versus liquid non-CE (n = 245)" and "inactive CE (n = 52) versus solid non-CE (n = 12)" groups showed similar results. Specificity was high for all tests (0.99-1.00) and did not differ between test combination scenarios. WB may be the best test to apply in a one-test approach. Two first-level tests confirmed by WB seem to provide the best diagnostic accuracy. Further studies should be performed in different settings, especially where lower test specificity is likely.

Sensitive typing of reverse ABO blood groups with a waveguide-mode sensor.

Portable, on-site blood typing methods will help provide life-saving blood transfusions to patients during an emergency or natural calamity, such as significant earthquakes. We have previously developed waveguide-mode (WM) sensors for forward ABO and Rh(D) blood typing and detection of antibodies against hepatitis B virus and hepatitis C virus. In this study, we evaluated a WM-sensor for reverse ABO blood typing. Since reverse ABO blood typing is a method for detection of antibodies against type A and type B oligosaccharide antigens on the surface of red blood cells (RBCs), we fixed a synthetic type A or type B trisaccharide antigen on the sensor chip of the WM sensor. We obtained significant changes in the reflectance spectra from a WM sensor on type A antigen with type B plasma and type O plasma and on type B antigen with type A plasma and type O plasma, and no spectrum changes on type A antigen or type B antigen with type AB plasma. Signal enhancement with the addition of a peroxidase reaction failed to increase the sensitivity for detection on oligosaccharide chips. By utilizing hemagglutination detection using regent type A and type B RBCs, we successfully determined reverse ABO blood groups with higher sensitivity compared to a method using oligosaccharide antigens. Thus, functionality of a portable device utilizing a WM sensor can be expanded to include reverse ABO blood typing and, in combination with forward ABO typing and antivirus antibody detection, may be useful for on-site blood testing in emergency settings.

A WHO reference reagent to standardize haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in serum and plasma: international collaborative study to evaluate a candidate preparation.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate a lyophilized serum preparation, 14/300, for its suitability to serve as a World Health Organization (WHO) Reference Reagent to standardize and control haemagglutination titrations for anti-A and anti-B in serum and plasma, in an international collaborative study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Serum preparation 14/300 and two plasma-based reserve preparations, 14/304 (high titre anti-A) and 14/208 (high titre anti-B), were titrated by 24 laboratories in 13 countries using direct (DRT) and indirect (IAT) haemagglutination techniques. RESULTS: There was eightfold to 64-fold variation in reported titres per preparation and method across laboratories, that is, titres extended over 4-7 dilutions, although intralaboratory variability was generally good, with over 90% of replicate titres within a twofold range. There was a reduction in interlaboratory variability when titres of the reserve preparations were adjusted relative to those of the candidate Reference Reagent. CONCLUSION: The establishment of 14/300 as a WHO Reference Reagent for high titre anti-A and anti-B in serum, with nominal anti-A and anti-B titres of 128 for DRT, and nominal anti-A and anti-B titres of 256 for IAT, will facilitate global standardization of haemagglutination titrations for anti-A and anti-B in patient samples and blood components.

[Standardization of a direct agglutination test for the immunodiagnosis of Chagas disease]. / Estandarización de la técnica de aglutinación directa para el inmunodiagnóstico de la enfermedad de Chagas.

INTRODUCTION: Chagas' disease is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and its immunological diagnosis is mainly based on the detection of antibodies against T. cruzi using tests such as the ELISA, the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) and the indirect hemagglutination test (IHAT). The main disadvantage of the IHAT is the need to prepare sheep erythrocytes, whose availability is limited and they have a short duration once prepared. However, there are alternative tests, such as the direct agglutination test (DAT). OBJECTIVE: To standardize the direct agglutination test for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes were prepared using two protocols, with and without trypsin treatment. The parasites were stained and optimal conditions for parasitic concentration and serum dilutions were determined. We evaluated the technique using sera from patients with Chagas disease, from healthy individuals and from individuals with other parasitic diseases. RESULTS: The optimal parasitic concentration was 500 x 10(6) parasites/ml using stained parasites without trypsin treatment. The optimal serum dilutions were 1/25, 1/50 y 1/100 and the cut-off point was the 1/50 dilution. The diagnostic indices for the standardized technique were as follows: Sensitivity, 94.3% (95% CI: 79.5-99.0) and specificity, 96.3% (95% CI: 88.8-99.0), with positive and negative predictive values of 91.7% (95% CI: 76.4-97.8) and 97.5% (95% CI: 90.4-99.6), respectively. Cross-reaction was observed only in three sera from individuals with visceral leishmaniasis. The results were compared with those obtained by IHA, ELISA, and IFA, and the concordance rate was 96% and the kappa index, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99). CONCLUSION: The standardized direct agglutination test could be useful for immunodiagnosis of Chagas disease.

Estandarización de la técnica de aglutinación directa para el inmunodiagnóstico de la enfermedad de Chagas / Standardization of a direct agglutination test for the immunodiagnosis of Chagas disease

Introducción. La enfermedad de Chagas es causada por el parásito Trypanosoma cruzi y su diagnóstico inmunológico se basa principalmente en la detección de anticuerpos contra T. cruzi mediante pruebas tales como ELISA, inmunofluorescencia indirecta (IFI) y hemaglutinación indirecta (HAI). Esta última tiene el inconveniente de requerir la preparación de eritrocitos de carnero, difíciles de obtener y de poca duración. Sin embargo, existen pruebas alternativas, como la técnica de aglutinación directa. Objetivo. Estandarizar la técnica de aglutinación directa para el diagnóstico de la enfermedad de Chagas. Materiales y métodos. Se prepararon parásitos epimastigotes de T. cruzi mediante dos protocolos, con tratamiento con tripsina y sin él. Los parásitos se colorearon, y se determinaron las condiciones óptimas de concentración parasitaria y diluciones de suero. Se utilizaron sueros de pacientes con enfermedad de Chagas, de individuos sanos y con otras parasitosis. Resultados. La concentración parasitaria óptima fue de 500 x10 6 parásitos/ml, utilizando parásitos coloreados y sin tratamiento con tripsina. Las diluciones de suero óptimas fueron de 1/25, 1/50 y1/100, y el punto de corte, la dilución de 1/50. La técnica estandarizada mostró índices diagnósticos de sensibilidad de 94,3 % (IC 95% 79,5-99,0) y de especificidad de 96,3 % (IC 95% 88,8-99,0); se encontró reacción cruzada en tres sueros de individuos con leishmaniasis visceral, con valores pronósticos positivo y negativo de 91,7 % (IC 95% 76,4-97,8) y de 97,5 % (IC 95% 90,4-99,6), respectivamente. Se compararon los resultados con los obtenidos por HAI, ELISA e IFI y la concordancia fue de 96 % con un índice kappa de 0,90 (IC 95% 0,81-0,99). Conclusión. La técnica de aglutinación directa estandarizada podría ser útil para el inmunodiagnóstico de la enfermedad de Chagas.

Introduction: Chagas´ disease is caused by the parasite Trypanosoma cruzi and its immunological diagnosis is mainly based on the detection of antibodies against T. cruzi using tests such as the ELISA, the indirect fluorescence antibody test (IFAT) and the indirect hemagglutination test (IHAT). The main disadvantage of the IHAT is the need to prepare sheep erythrocytes, whose availability is limited and they have a short duration once prepared. However, there are alternative tests, such as the direct agglutination test (DAT). Objective: To standardize the direct agglutination test for the diagnosis of Chagas disease. Materials and methods: Trypanosoma cruzi epimastigotes were prepared using two protocols, with and without trypsin treatment. The parasites were stained and optimal conditions for parasitic concentration and serum dilutions were determined. We evaluated the technique using sera from patients with Chagas disease, from healthy individuals and from individuals with other parasitic diseases. Results: The optimal parasitic concentration was 500 x 10 6 parasites/ml using stained parasites without trypsin treatment. The optimal serum dilutions were 1/25, 1/50 y 1/100 and the cut-off point was the 1/50 dilution. The diagnostic indices for the standardized technique were as follows: Sensitivity, 94.3% (95% CI: 79.5-99.0) and specificity, 96.3% (95% CI: 88.8-99.0), with positive and negative predictive values ?? of 91.7% (95% CI: 76.4-97.8) and 97.5% (95% CI: 90.4-99.6), respectively. Cross-reaction was observed only in three sera from individuals with visceral leishmaniasis. The results were compared with those obtained by IHA, ELISA, and IFA, and the concordance rate was 96% and the kappa index, 0.90 (95% CI: 0.81-0.99). Conclusion: The standardized direct agglutination test could be useful for immunodiagnosis of Chagas disease.

International reference reagents to standardise blood group genotyping: evaluation of candidate preparations in an international collaborative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate, in an international collaboration, four lyophilised genomic DNA preparations, selected from genotyped and phenotyped donors by the study organisers, for their suitability to standardise and control blood group genotyping procedures for common ancestral Caucasian and Black African alleles. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-nine laboratories performed 'blind' testing of replicated ampoules of the candidate reference reagents, RBC1 (10/232), RBC4 (10/236), RBC5 (10/238) and RBC12 (10/234), using a range of genotyping procedures, most commonly classical PCR using allele or sequence specific primers. RESULTS: The majority of laboratories reported blood group genotypes in accordance with those determined by the study organisers and the serological phenotypes. Despite an overall high level of accuracy in genotyping, the identified errors and inconsistencies, and the limited genotyping capabilities of many laboratories, confirmed the need for validated reference materials to control test procedures. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of RBC1, RBC4, RBC5 and RBC12 as World Health Organization Reference Reagents will facilitate international standardisation of blood group genotyping and ensure that such tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific.

Strict vs lenient criteria for elution testing: comparison of yields between two tertiary care medical centers.

In this study, 2 patient populations, using different elution strategies, were compared to evaluate eluate yields under more and less restrictive conditions. An informative eluate was defined as one in which an antibody that could be clinically significant was detected in the eluate but was not detectable in the plasma at the time of elution testing. The results for 160 direct antiglobulin tests (DATs) and 160 elution studies were evaluated in 71 patients at the adult hospital (lenient criteria). The results for 372 DATs and 43 elution studies were evaluated in 123 patients at the pediatric hospital (strict criteria). The yields from these eluates were 0.6% at the adult hospital (C antibody) vs 2.3% at the pediatric hospital (Jk(a) antibody). Thus, the yield of information from eluate testing is low regardless of the stringency applied to testing. However, considering the cost and time required for testing, more stringent criteria are advised.

International collaborative study to establish reference preparations to standardise haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in normal intravenous immunoglobulins by the direct method.

A joint project (coded BSP089) was run by the European Directorate for the Quality of Medicines & HealthCare (EDQM) of the Council of Europe, the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) on behalf of the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER) of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate, in an international collaborative study, 3 lyophilised intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations for their suitability to serve as Reference Preparations to standardise and control the highly variable haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in IVIG products. 23 laboratories tested candidate IVIG reference preparations consisting of a Positive control, a Negative control and a specifically formulated Limit test reference preparation to define the maximum (e.g., pharmacopoeial) limits of anti-A and anti-B haemagglutinins in IVIG products, where limits are applicable. Laboratories performed direct haemagglutination using papain-treated erythrocytes and/or indirect anti-globulin tests. For both methods, there was up to 16-fold variation in anti-A and anti-B titres, although there was good agreement over a 2-fold titre range for anti-A and anti-B between laboratories using the direct method for both the Positive control and Limit reference preparations. Comparative titration data for the Positive control and Limit reference preparations indicated that the use of a 'Limit' test reference preparation would facilitate identification of higher titre batches when the direct haemagglutination method is used. The Positive control, Negative control and Limit test preparations were adopted in November 2008 by the Commission of the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) as Biological Reference Preparations. The same preparations have been established as reference reagents by the WHO and the U.S FDA, including the maximal specifications defined by the Limit test preparation. This will facilitate global standardisation of haemagglutination tests for anti-A and anti-B, ensure that such tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific, and facilitate identification of batches that exceed maximum recommended levels of anti-A and anti-B antibodies.

Toward extended phenotype matching: a new operational paradigm for the transfusion service.

BACKGROUND: Conventional pretransfusion testing uses hemagglutination to ensure donor-recipient compatibility for ABO/D status and recipient alloantibodies. While screening large numbers of donor units for multiple antigens by hemagglutination is impractical, novel methods of DNA analysis permit the rapid determination of an extended human erythrocyte antigen (xHEA) phenotype. A prospective observational study was conducted at four hospital transfusion services to test an alternative paradigm of identifying xHEA-typed units for patients in three cohorts by utilizing DNA analysis and a novel inventory management model. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: xHEA typing of recipient samples and donor units of known ABO/D status was performed by HEA analysis (BeadChip, BioArray Solutions). xHEA-typed units were assigned to pending transfusion requests using an inventory management system designed to simulate blood order processing. The fraction of requests fulfilled, or "fill fraction" (FF) was determined at four levels of matching stringency. RESULTS: For alloimmunized patients, all but one participating site observed an FF of more than 95% when matching for ABO, D, and known alloantibodies and an FF of more than 90% when additionally matching for C, c, E, e, and K; the site handling the most challenging requests still observed FFs of 62 and 51%, respectively. FF was found to correlate positively with the ratio of available donor units to units requested and negatively with the degree of recipient alloimmunization. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that substantial fill fractions can be achieved by selecting existing donor units for xHEA analysis and operating an inventory management system for efficient allocation of units to recipients.

[Comparison of commercial IFA, IHA and in-house IFA tests in the diagnosis of cystic echinococosis]. / Kistik ekinokokkozis tanisinda ticari indirekt floresan antikor (IFA), indirekt hemaglutinasyon (IHA) testleri ve laboratuvarimizda hazirladigimiz IFA testinin karsilastirilmasi.

Hydatidosis is an endemic illness in many regions of world. Several serodiagnostic techniques have been evaluated for the diagnosis of cystic hydatid disease caused by Echinococcus granulosus. The aim of this study was to assess the efficiency of the commercial fluorescent antibody test (IFAT), indirect hemaglutination test (IHAT) and in-house IFA tests. For this purpose sera from one hundred patients who had been given a diagnosis of hydatid cyst by surgery were used. In-house IFA was developed using the germinal membrane of Echinococcus granulosus and sera were studied by the three different methods. As a result, the specificity of commercial IFA, IHA and in-house IFA was found to be 100% and sensitivities of these tests were 87.7%, 74.6% and 83.3% respectively. In conclusion, in-house IFA test is a useful and cost effective but difficult test to prepare for the routine laboratory.

International collaborative study to evaluate candidate reference reagents to standardize haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in normal intravenous immunoglobulin products.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to evaluate, in an international collaboration, three lyophilized intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) preparations for their suitability to standardize and control haemagglutination testing for anti-A and anti-B in IVIG products. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty-three laboratories tested candidate IVIG reference reagents consisting of a Positive control (07/306), a Negative control (07/308), and a specifically formulated Limit preparation (07/310) to define the maximum (e.g. pharmacopoeial) limits of anti-A and anti-B in IVIG products, where limits are applicable. Laboratories performed direct haemagglutination using papain-treated erythrocytes and/or indirect antiglobulin tests. RESULTS: For both methods, there was up to 16-fold variation in anti-A and anti-B titres, although there was good agreement over a two-fold titre range for anti-A and anti-B between laboratories for both 07/306 and 07/310 using the direct method. Comparative titration data for 07/306 and 07/310 indicated that the use of a 'Limit' reference reagent would facilitate identification of higher titre batches when the direct haemagglutination method is used. CONCLUSIONS: The establishment of preparations 07/306, 07/308 and 07/310 as reference reagents by the World Health Organization will facilitate global standardization of haemagglutination tests for anti-A and anti-B, ensure that such tests are sufficiently sensitive and specific, and facilitate identification of batches that exceed maximum recommended levels of anti-A and anti-B. The Commission of the European Pharmacopoeia and the United States Food and Drug Administration have adopted the same reference reagents including the maximal specifications defined by preparation 07/310.

Comparison of the performance of microtube column systems and solid-phase systems and the tube low-ionic-strength solution additive indirect antiglobulin test in the detection of red cell alloantibodies.

To compare the performance of seven currently available test systems in the detection of erythrocyte alloantibodies (ab), we tested in parallel 446 sera samples containing red cell ab [368 sera samples with ab that are assumed to be clinically significant (cs-ab) and 78 sera samples with ab that are assumed to be of minor clinical significance (ms-ab)] using the tube spin low-ionic-strength solution (addition method) indirect antiglobulin test (tube LISS-IAT), three microtube column agglutination techniques (DiaMed-ID, Ortho BioVue and Bio-Rad Scangel), one affinity adherence test system (CLB/Mast CellBind Screen) and two solid-phase tests [Biotest Solidscreen II and Immucor Capture-R Ready-Screen (4)]. To address the specificity of the three test systems under routine conditions, results of 4566 patient samples obtained using the tube LISS-IAT, results of 5205 patient samples obtained using the Scangel and results of 3560 samples obtained using the Capture-R were evaluated. The DiaMed-ID detected 344 cs-ab and 43 ms-ab, BioVue 333 cs-ab and 48 ms-ab, Scangel 348 cs-ab and 62 ms-ab, CellBind Screen 346 cs-ab and 47 ms-ab, Solidscreen 330 cs-ab and 38 ms-ab, Capture-R 358 cs-ab and 45 ms-ab and LISS-IAT 159 cs-ab and 12 ms-ab. In routine practice, erythrocyte cs-ab could be identified in 61 (67.8%) of 90 reactive sera (specificity: 98.6%) in the tube LISS-IAT, in 169 (58.7%) of 288 (94.4%) in Bio-Rad Scangel and in 101 (51.0%) of 198 reactive sera (94.3%) in Capture-R. We conclude that the sensitivity of the microcolumn, affinity adherence and solid-phase test systems in the detection of cs-ab was similar and was markedly superior to that of the conventional tube LISS-IAT. All high-sensitive test systems produced higher rates of false positives and ms-ab compared to the tube test. An individual cost-benefit analysis, considering the recent knowledge about the clinical significance of weak-reactive cs-ab, should be performed in every institution to decide whether and if so which high-sensitive screening system should be applied.

External quality assessment scheme in red blood cell serology: a 5-year experience in Thailand.

From 2000 to 2004, 36, 58, 72, 78, and 86 laboratories participated in an external quality assessment scheme (EQAS) organized by the Department of Transfusion Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital. Each year the staff was requested to perform ABO grouping, D typing, antibody screening, antibody identification, and DATs on eight blood samples. Each participant received information on the correct test results and a coded summary. Regarding ABO grouping, the error rate ranged from 0.3 to 1.3 percent, mostly due to human errors. Error rates in D typing ranged from 0.7 to 5.7 percent, the most problematic being weak D phenotype interpretation. Although every sample was negative by the DAT, error rates due to false positive test results were determined to be 0.4 to 2.1 percent. Antibody screening errors were also found; however, errors steadily decreased from 4.2 percent in 2000 to 0.3 percent in 2004. Only 69.4 to 87.2 percent of laboratories performed antibody identification; however, correct results increased from 78.4 to 91.0 percent. In conclusion, an EQAS in RBC serology should be used to compare results from different laboratories and to identify those laboratories that need improvement in testing procedures.

An International Standard for specifying the minimum potency of anti-D blood-grouping reagents: evaluation of a candidate preparation in an international collaborative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate a lyophilized monoclonal immunoglobulin M (IgM) anti-D preparation for use as an International Standard to specify a recommended minimum acceptable potency of anti-D blood-grouping reagents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The candidate International Standard (99/836) for specifying the minimum potency of anti-D blood-grouping reagents was evaluated against a wide range of commercial anti-D blood-grouping reagents in an international collaborative study involving 20 laboratories in 13 countries. Laboratories titrated reconstituted 99/836, in parallel with as many commercial anti-D blood-grouping reagents as were available to them, in tube tests according to specified haemagglutination methodology for low-protein (e.g. monoclonal IgM) and high-protein (e.g. polyclonal) reagents. The ratios of the mean end-point titres of the reagents to that of 99/836 within each laboratory were calculated. RESULTS: The ratios of the mean titres of the low-protein reagents to the mean titre of 99/836 within a laboratory fell between 0.25 and 2 for 43 of the 45 low-protein anti-D reagents tested (i.e. the potencies of the low-protein reagents compared with 99/836 were between a 1:4 dilution of 99/836 to twice as potent as 99/836). The ratios of the mean titres of the high-protein reagents to the mean titre of 99/836 within a laboratory fell within 0.125 and 1 for eight out of the 10 high protein reagents tested. CONCLUSIONS: By international consensus, a 1:3 dilution of reconstituted 99/836 was deemed appropriate to define a recommended minimum acceptable potency of low-protein anti-D blood-grouping reagents. A 1:8 dilution of reconstituted 99/836 was deemed appropriate to define a recommended minimum acceptable potency of high-protein anti-D blood-grouping reagents. On the basis of the results presented here, 99/836 was established by the World Health Organization as the 1st International Standard for specifying the minimum potency of anti-D blood-grouping reagents, in tube tests.

International collaborative study to establish immunoglobulin (anti-D test) BRP batch 1.

An international collaborative study was organised to establish a European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur.) Biological Reference Preparation (BRP) and United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reference preparation for the test for anti-D (anti-Rho) antibodies in human normal immunoglobulin for intravenous administration (IGIV). A candidate positive control (IGIV+anti-D) and negative control IGIV were compared to corresponding World Health Organization (WHO) International Reference Reagents using a direct haemagglutination reference method. Sixteen (16) laboratories participated in the collaborative study. Further to completion of the study, the materials assayed in the study were granted the status of Ph. Eur. and US FDA reference preparations for controlling the levels of anti-D in IGIV.