Evidence-based protocol for diagnosis and treatment of hepatorenal syndrome is independently associated with lower mortality.

BACKGROUND: Hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) is the deadliest complication of cirrhosis. The purpose of this study is to analyze if the use of a protocol for HRS is associated with higher survival in these patients. METHODS: An evidence-based protocol for the diagnosis and treatment of HRS was instituted in 2013. Data from medical records from 2010 to 2016 were obtained by searching the hospital database for patients who received terlipressin, in the three years before and after the institution of the protocol. Data were reviewed to confirm the diagnosis of HRS and multiple variables were collected. Liver-specific scores were calculated and a stepwise Cox regression approach was used for univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: The study included 46 patients, 20 from the pre-protocol period and 26 from the post-protocol period. Respectively, mortality at 30 days, 90 days and 365 days was 75%, 75% and 90% for the pre-protocol period, and 61%, 69% and 80% for the post-protocol period. In the multivariate analysis, an aspartate aminotransferase (AST) of <40U/L, the pre-protocol period and higher Child-Turcotte-Pugh scores were associated with higher 30-day and 90-day mortality. The total mean dose of terlipressin and human albumin used per patient was reduced from 27mg to 22mg and from 236g to 144g, respectively, after the institution of the protocol. This was not associated with higher mortality. CONCLUSION: The use of an evidence-based protocol for the treatment of HRS translated into a higher survival. The authors suggest that the use of evidence-based protocols for the diagnosis and treatment of HRS could reduce cost and mortality in tertiary hospitals.

Improvement of renal function prior to liver transplantation is not associated with better long-term renal outcome or survival.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Since MELD implementation renal impairment in liver transplant (LT) recipients has become of increasing importance. This is the first study evaluating the course of renal function immediately prior to LT as predictor for long-term renal and overall outcome. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, 226 adults undergoing LT at the University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf (2011-2015) were included. The impact of renal function over a period of 3 months prior to LT compared to renal function at the day of LT on long-term renal outcome and survival was assessed. RESULTS: According to GFR at day of LT renal function improved (≥1 CKD stage) in 64 patients (28%), remained stable in 144 (64%) or deteriorated in 18 (8%). Improvement of renal function prior to LT did neither significantly affect 90-day (13% vs. 14%, p = 0.83), nor 5-year post-LT mortality (35% vs. 41%, p = 0.57). 50 patients (22%) with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) received terlipressin prior to LT, but only 18 (37%) showed prolonged stabilization of renal function (improvement ≥1 CKD stage). Response to terlipressin did neither improve 90-day (p=1), 5-year mortality (p = 0.52) nor long-term renal function (p = 0.843). Nevertheless, need for dialysis pre-LT (59% vs. 34%, p = 0.005) and post-LT (62% vs. 17%, p<0.001) was associated with increased 5-year mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Improvement of renal function immediately prior to LT, either spontaneously or following terlipressin therapy, did neither ameliorate long-term renal outcome nor survival in LT recipients. Future studies need to clarify the impact of terlipressin in HRS on the transplant waiting time in LT candidates.

Treatment of Type-1 Hepatorenal Syndrome with Pentoxifylline: A Randomized Placebo Controlled Clinical Trial.

INTRODUCTION: Type-1 hepatorenal syndrome (HRS-1) portends a poor prognosis in patients with cirrhosis. Currently available medical therapies are largely ineffective, save for liver transplantation. We aimed to determine if pentoxifylline (PTX) therapy in addition to the standard of care of volume expansion with albumin and vasoconstriction with midodrine and octreotide (AMO) is safe and efficacious compared to AMO in HRS-1 treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Hospitalized subjects with decompensated cirrhosis and HRS-1 were enrolled. PTX or placebo was administered with AMO therapy for up to 14 days. The primary endpoint was HRS-1 resolution (serum creatinine ≤ 1.5 g/dL for > 24 h). Secondary endpoints were change in creatinine and MELD score, partial treatment response, 30-and 180-day overall and transplant free survival. RESULTS: Twelve subjects with mean age 58.9 ± 6.2 years were enrolled and randomized. Mean MELD score was 26.5 ± 7.4 and 58.3% were male. Overall cohort 30- and 180-day survival was 58.3% and 33.3% respectively. Two subjects underwent liver transplantation. HRS-1 resolution (16.7% vs. 16.7%, p = 1.000), partial treatment response (33.3% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.505), change in creatinine (+0.48 g/dL, 95% CI -0.49-1.46 vs. +0.03 g/dL, 95% CI -0.64- 0.70, p = 0.427), 30-day survival (66.6% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.558) and 180-day survival (50.0% vs. 16.7%, p = 0.221) were similar between the two groups. Serious adverse events necessitating treatment discontinuation were rare (n = 1, PTX). DISCUSSION: The addition of PTX to AMO in the treatment of HRS-1 is safe when compared to the current standard of care. Future large-scale prospective study to validate the efficacy of this treatment seems warranted.

Terlipressin versus noradrenaline in the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome: systematic review with meta-analysis and full economic evaluation.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and costs of terlipressin and noradrenaline for the treatment of hepatorenal syndrome from the perspective of the Brazilian public health system and that of a major private health insurance. METHODS: Comparison of efficacy was performed through a systematic review with a meta-analysis of randomized-controlled trials using a random-effects model. Economic evaluation was carried out through cost minimization. RESULTS: Four studies (154 patients) were included in the meta-analysis. There was no evidence of a difference between treatments with terlipressin or noradrenaline in terms of 30-day survival (risk ratio=1.04, 95% confidence interval=0.84-1.30, P=0.70). From the perspective of the public health system, costs of the treatments with terlipressin or noradrenaline were Int$7437.04 and Int$8406.41, respectively. From the perspective of the private health insurance, costs of treatments with terlipressin and noradrenaline were Int$13,484.57 and Int$15,061.01, respectively. CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of superiority between treatment strategies using terlipressin or noradrenaline in terms of the survival of patients with hepatorenal syndrome, but the strategy using terlipressin was more economical under two different perspectives.

Noradrenaline or terlipressin for hepatorenal syndrome?

Hepatorenal syndrome is a condition associated with very high mortality that may be reverted in some cases with vasoconstrictors. Terlipressin has generally been considered standard treatment, but noradrenaline has been postulated as alternative. Searching in Epistemonikos database, which is maintained by screening 30 databases, we identified six systematic reviews including four pertinent randomized controlled trials. We combined the evidence using meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings following the GRADE approach. We concluded noradrenaline and terlipressin probably have similar effects on reverting hepatorrenal syndrome and decreasing mortality, but noradrenaline is associated with less adverse effects, and has lower costs.

El síndrome hepatorrenal es una condición asociada a altísima mortalidad, que puede ser recuperada en ciertos casos con el uso de vasoconstrictores. Generalmente se considera que terlipresina es el tratamiento estándar, pero noradrenalina se ha planteado como una alternativa. Utilizando la base de datos Epistemonikos, la cual es mantenida mediante búsquedas en 30 bases de datos, identificamos seis revisiones sistemáticas que en conjunto incluyen cuatro estudios aleatorizados. Realizamos un metanálisis y tablas de resumen de los resultados utilizando el método GRADE. Concluimos que noradrenalina y terlipresina son probablemente igual de efectivas en lograr mejoría del síndrome hepatorrenal y disminuir la mortalidad, pero que noradrenalina se asocia a menos efectos adversos, y tiene un menor costo.

High age and low sodium urine concentration are associated with poor survival in patients with hepatorenal syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Combination therapy with terlipressin and albumin substitution is considered a widely accepted treatment regimen for patients with hepatorenal syndrome (HRS). However, only half of the patients respond to treatment and to date albumin substitution and terlipressin therapy are among the most expensive medical treatments available for patients with liver diseases. Thus, we aimed to identify clinical and etiological parameters to predict treatment response and overall mortality in patients with HRS. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 21 patients, 13 male/8 female, aged 43-72 years with HRS. Four patients were transplanted after following combination treatment. Terlipressin was administered by continuous intravenous perfusion (2-6 mg/d) and albumin drips (50 mg) were given daily. Treatment response was defined by a decrease in serum creatinine level to ≤ 1.5 mg/dL or by a ≥ 50% reduction of the baseline concentration. RESULTS: 57% of the patients responded to treatment, which was associated with improved survival at day 60, compared to non-responders. However, the overall mortality was not different between the two groups. Median age of 63 years was a significant negative predictor for therapy response. High baseline urinary sodium levels were of prognostic value for survival. The Model of End stage Liver Disease score (MELD score) did not correlate with therapy response. CONCLUSION: In conclusion high age is a predictor of non-response. Low urinary sodium before treatment is associated with poor survival. Terlipressin and albumin co-treatment is associated with increased two-months survival rate. This seemingly moderate extension in survival rate can, however, be decisive for obtaining liver transplantation.

Problemas renales de la cirrosis

Cirrhosis of the liver is a common entity frequently seen by the clinician only after initiation of edema or ascitis. Renal problems have been described for many years associated to all types of cirrhosis, and are responsible for many abnormalities of water and electrolytes seen in these patients. One of the most remarkable renal abnormalities is sodium retention, with urinary excretion (Una V) of less than 10 mEq/1. This fact explains the common appearance of edema and ascitis even in the early states of cirrhosis. For many years two main theories have been postulated in order to explain this avid sodium retention: 1) The "underfill theory" states that the initial event is a state of peripheral vasodilatation that causes ineffective plasma volume and sodium retention by the kidney, meaning that the sodium retention is a secondary event. 2) the "overflow theory" in contrast, emphasizes that the primary event is sodium retention by the kidney, with secondary expansion of plasma volume and associated sequestration of fluid in the abdomen due to portal hypertension and a reduction of the colloid-osmotic pressure. Recent evidence is suggestive that both theories play a significant role in the avid sodium retention of cirrhosis. In order to explain the sodium retention by the kidney the following humoral factors have been postulated: increased secretion and decreased degradation of aldosterone, decreased production of prostaglandin E, increased secretion of catecholamines, decreased response to the natriuretic atrial factor and abnormalities of the kalikrein-kinin system. Although some studies have shown abnormalities in the handling of water by the kidney, most of the evidence suggest that it is due to the sodium retention...