Significance of HIFU in local unresectable recurrence of soft tissue sarcoma, a single-center, respective, case series in China.

PURPOSE: Multimodality treatment of soft tissue sarcoma(STS) by expert teams reportedly affords a tremendous improvement in outcome of patients. Despite advances, treatment of local unresectable recurrence remains difficult and is not standardized. We performed this retrospective study in order to assess the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in treating STS patients with local unresectable recurrence. METHODS: Thirty-six STS patients with local unresectable recurrence from January 2015 to December 2016 were recruited according to the inclusion criteria. Pain rating, response rate, disease control rate, local disease progression-free survival(LPFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival(OS) were used to evaluate efficacy of HIFU treatment. RESULTS: HIFU resulted in a significant relief in pain rating, without severe side effects. According to magnetic resonance imaging(MRI), three months after HIFU treatment, response rate was 47.3% and the local disease control rate was 80.6%. Twelve months post HIFU treatment, response rate was 38.9% and the local disease control rate was 55.6%. The median LPFS, PFS and OS time for 36 patients was 13 months, 10 months and 20 months respectively. CONCLUSION: HIFU is a tolerated treatment modality with promising activity and safety in STS patients with local unresectable recurrence.

High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation for advanced pancreatic cancer.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and survival factors of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation in the treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted between September 2010 and March 2016. Advanced pancreatic cancer patients with HIFU treatment were enrolled in the analysis to evaluate the efficacy of local ablation, pain relief, and relative complications of HIFU therapy. The main factors that affected Overall survival rate (OSR) and median survival time (MST) were also analyzed. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients received HIFU treatment, with a total of 93 treatments performed, and 83 cases were evaluated. Complete response rate (RR) was 3.6% (3/83) and partial RR was 79.5% (66/83). After HIFU treatment, pain reduction was observed in 74 patients, and the total remission rate was 97.6% (74/76). The total MST was 9.9 months (2-58.7 months), the total OSR in 1 and 2 years was 41.5% and 9.6%, respectively. Minor complications occurred in 97.7% (42/43) patients, including transient fever, abdominal pain, skin burn, and amylase elevation. The univariate analysis showed that the clinical stage, treatment method, ablation efficacy, and combined treatment were significant prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: HIFU can significantly alleviate cancer-related pain and prolong the survival time of patients with pancreatic cancer.

Efficacy and safety of non-invasive body tightening with high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU).

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive skin-tightening devices have become increasingly popular in response to increasing demand for improvements in skin laxity and tightening with minimal risk and recovery time. OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the efficacy and safety of HIFU for skin tightening in the face and body. METHODS: A total of 32 Korean subjects enrolled in this prospective clinical trial. The subjects were treated with HIFU to both cheeks, lower abdomen, and thigh. Skin elasticity was measured before and after treatment using a Cutometer (CT575, Courage and Khazaka® , Cologne, Germany). Three blinded, experienced dermatologists evaluated paired pre- and post-treatment (week 4 and 12) photographs according to the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (GAIS). Participants also completed self-assessments using GAIS. Subjects rated their pain on a numeric rating scale (NRS) immediately, 7 days, 4 weeks, and 12 weeks after treatment. RESULTS: Skin elasticity measured via a Cutometer was significantly improved 12 weeks after treatment at all treated sites (P<.05). Both IGAIS and SGAIS showed significant improvements 12 weeks after treatment. Immediately after treatment the mean NRS score was 3.00±1.586, but no pain was reported at 4 and 12 weeks post-treatment. No serious adverse effects were observed during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: HIFU safely and effectively improves skin elasticity and clinical contouring of the face and body.

High intensity focused ultrasound ablation for patients with inoperable liver cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To analyses the feasibility and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment in patients with inoperable liver cancer. METHODOLOGY: 187 patients were treated with HIFU, of all these patients 116 cases were Primary Liver Cancer (PLC) and 71 cases were Metastatic Liver Cancer (MLC). According to some parameters, such as clinical symptoms, the basis of main organs functional tests, imaging examinations, and progression-free survival (PFS) time to assess the safety and efficacy of HIFU in the treatment of liver cancer. RESULTS: 55 patients (29.4%) achieved CR and 73 patients (39.0%) achieved PR, 32 patients (17.1%) had responses of SD, and 27 patients (14.4%) were PD, respectively. Response rates were 90.5% (32 CR + 6 PR/42) in left lobe cancer and 64.1% (22 CR + 62 PR/131) in right lobe cancer. The median PFS for those CR case was 7 months, of PLC was 8 months, of MLC was 5 months. CONCLUSIONS: HIFU is effective and feasible in the treatment of liver cancer. It offer a significant noninvasive therapy for local treatment of liver cancer. For those right lobe liver cancers or with poor ultrasonic window, increasing treatment time or repeated treatment may improve the efficiency of HIFU ablation.

High intensity focused ultrasound: a noninvasive therapy for locally advanced pancreatic cancer.

The noninvasive ablation of pancreatic cancer with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) energy is received increasingly widespread interest. With rapidly temperature rise to cytotoxic levels within the focal volume of ultrasound beams, HIFU can selectively ablate a targeted lesion of the pancreas without any damage to surrounding or overlying tissues. Preliminary studies suggest that this approach is technical safe and feasible, and can be used alone or in combination with systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer. It can effectively alleviate cancer-related abdominal pain, and may confer an additional survival benefit with few significant complications. This review provides a brief overview of HIFU, describes current clinical applications, summarizes characteristics of continuous and pulsed HIFU, and discusses future applications and challenges in the treatment of pancreatic cancer.

Survival analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound therapy vs. transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a non-invasive treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), but long-term survival analysis is lacking. This study was to analyse its outcome compared to that of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). METHODS: From October 2003 to September 2010, 113 patients received HIFU ablation as a treatment of HCCs at our hospital. Twenty-six patients had HCCs sized 3-8 cm. Fifty-two patients with matched tumour characteristics having TACE as primary treatment were selected for comparison. Short-term outcome and long-term survival were analysed. RESULTS: In the HIFU group (n = 26), 46 tumours were ablated. The median age of the patients was 69 (49-84) years. The median tumour size was 4.2 (3-8) cm. In the TACE group (n = 52), the median age of the patients was 67 (44-84) years. The median tumour size was 4.8 (3-8) cm. There was no hospital mortality in any of the groups. In the HIFU group, the rates of complete tumour response, partial tumour response, stable disease and progressive disease were 50%, 7.7%, 25.6% and 7.7% respectively, according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours. The TACE group had the corresponding rates at 0%, 21.2%, 63.5% and 15.4% respectively (P < 0.0001). The 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 84.6%, 49.2% and 32.3% respectively, in the HIFU group and 69.2%, 29.8% and 2.3% respectively, in the TACE group (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: HIFU ablation is a safe and effective method for unresectable HCCs. A survival benefit is observed over sole TACE.

High intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy in patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer. METHODOLOGY: 39 patients with local advanced pancreatic cancer were treated with HIFU, including 26 male and 13 female patients. The locations of the tumours were as follows: head of pancreas in 7 patients, body and/or tail of pancreas in 32 patients. Pain relief, time to progression (TTP), median survival and complications were analysed after HIFU treatment. RESULTS: There were no severe complications or adverse events related to HIFU therapy in any of the patients treated. Pain relief was achieved in 79.5% of patients. Median TTP was 5.0 months. The median overall survival time was 11 months. 6-month and 1-year survival rate for patients were 82.1% and 30.8% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Although this study may have limitations, preliminary results demonstrate the safetyof clinical application of HIFU for pancreatic cancer and reveal it to be a promising mode of treatment for local advanced pancreatic cancers.

Survival analysis of high-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) ablation is a non-invasive treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). At present, data on the treatment's long-term outcome are limited. This study analysed the survival outcome of HIFU ablation for HCCs smaller than 3 cm. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-seven patients with HCCs smaller than 3 cm received HIFU treatment between October 2006 and September 2010. Fifty-nine patients who received percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) were selected for comparison. The two groups of patients were compared in terms of pre-operative variables and survival. RESULTS: More patients in the HIFU group patients had Child-Pugh B cirrhosis (34% versus 8.5%; P = 0.001). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of patients whose tumours were completely ablated in the HIFU group compared with the RFA group were 97.4% versus 94.6% and 81.2% versus 79.8%, respectively (P = 0.530). The corresponding 1- and 3-year disease-free survival rates were 63.6% versus 62.4% and 25.9% versus 34.1% (P = 0.683). CONCLUSIONS: HIFU ablation is a safe and effective method for small HCCs. It can achieve survival outcomes comparable to those of percutaneous RFA and thus serves as a good alternative ablation treatment for patients with cirrhosis.

Follow-up of high-intensity focused ultrasound treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nonsurgical therapies have become treatment options for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study was to evaluate the efficacy and complications of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) treatment for patients with HCC. Between May 2001 and May 2005, 145 patients with HCC were enrolled for treatments using a HIFU tumor therapeutic system. Clinical symptoms, hepatic functions and values of serum α-fetoprotein (AFP) were tested before and after HIFU treatment. The changes in computerized tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), complications and survival time after HIFU were also obtained for further analysis. Symptoms improved or pain was relieved in 84.8% of the 145 patients and the rate of serum AFP decrease was 71.7%. The size of the target tumor shrank by various degrees. The 2-year survival rate was 80% in patients with stage Ib HCC, 51.4% in stage IIa and 46.5% in stage IIIa. During HIFU treatment, complications included body temperature increase and abnormal cardiac rhythm. After HIFU procedures, there were skin burns of different grades. In conclusion, HIFU is safe and effective for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma; HIFU can improve the survival quality of patients with HCC.

Long-term outcome of high-intensity focused ultrasound in advanced pancreatic cancer.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate safety and efficacy of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). METHODS: Patients with PC TNM stage III or IV were included. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed 2 weeks before and after the HIFU. The ablating tumor volume was calculated by ratio of the nonperfused necrotic area of the planned area on contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image on post-HIFU magnetic resonance imaging. The ablation results were stratified into 4 ranges: 100% to 90% unenhanced area of targeting area, 90% to 50%, within 50%, and no change. RESULTS: High-intensity focused ultrasound treatment was performed without severe adverse event in 46 patients, 49 times (male-female = 25:21; mean age, 60.7 ± 10.0; TNM stage 3-stage 4 = 18:28). Average size of the PC lesion was 4.2 ± 1.4 cm (1.6-9.3 cm). After HIFU treatment, ablating tumor volume was as follows: 90% to 100% in 38 lesions, 90% to 50% in 8, and within 50% in 3. Overall median survival (S1) from initial PC diagnosis was 12.4 months. Overall survival (S2) rates at 6, 12, and 18 months from HIFU were 52.2%, 30.4%, and 21.79%, respectively, with a median survival of 7.0 months CONCLUSIONS: High-intensity focused ultrasound is safe and effective, which induced excellent local tumor control in most patients with advanced PC.

High-intensity focused ultrasound ablation in hepatic and pancreatic cancer: complications.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the complications of high-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) in patients with hepatic and pancreatic cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From January 2006 to December 2008, 133 sessions of HIFU treatment were performed in 114 consecutive patients with primary hepatic tumor (n = 57), hepatic metastasis (n = 22), and pancreatic cancer (n = 35) under general anesthesia. The extracorporeal, ultrasound-guided Model-JC system (HAIFU, Chongqing, China) was used. Artificial pleural effusion was created to obtain an adequate sonographic window for ablating hepatic dome masses in 53 patients. We reviewed medical records and imaging findings before, during, and after HIFU. RESULTS: All patients had skin redness, edema, and pain in the treatment regions. All hepatic tumor patients had necrosis of the ribs along the main ultrasound beam path that did not require further treatment. Major complications included biliary obstruction, symptomatic pleural effusion, pneumothorax and fistula formation between an abdominal wall abscess and the ablated hepatic tumor. In 35 pancreatic cancer patients, major complications included third-degree burns and fistula formation between the tumor and duodenum. Delayed complications in hepatic tumor patients included a diaphragmatic rupture and rib fractures along the ultrasound pathway. CONCLUSION: The complications of HIFU develop mainly around the targeted lesions or along the ultrasound beam pathway. It is essential to have awareness of the possible complications related to HIFU and its imaging features for to avoiding serious complications.

Systematic review of the efficacy and safety of high-intensity focussed ultrasound for the primary and salvage treatment of prostate cancer.

CONTEXT: High-intensity focussed ultrasound (HIFU) is an emerging minimally invasive treatment option for prostate cancer. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to assess the efficacy and safety of HIFU in both primary treatment of men with localised and locally advanced prostate cancer as well as salvage treatment of men with recurrent prostate cancer following treatment failure of radical prostatectomy or external-beam radiation therapy. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We conducted a systematic literature search for studies conducted on humans and published in either English or German in several databases from 2000 to 2010. In addition, we screened several Web sites for assessments on HIFU in prostate cancer and contacted the manufacturers of the two currently available HIFU devices for supplemental information on HIFU. We included all prospective studies with >50 study participants and assessed their quality using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: We identified 20 uncontrolled prospective case series, each of which treated between 58 and 517 patients. These studies were all conducted within the past decade. In total, 3018 patients were treated with HIFU, 93% for primary therapy and 7% for salvage HIFU. For all HIFU procedures, the biochemical disease-free survival rate at 1, 5, and 7 yr, respectively, was 78-84%, 45-84%, and 69%. The negative biopsy rate was 86% at 3 mo and 80% at 15 mo. Overall survival rates and prostate cancer-specific survival rates were 90% and 100% at 5 yr and 83% and 98% at 8 yr, respectively. Adverse events concerned the urinary tract (1-58%), potency (1-77%), the rectum (0-15%), and pain (1-6%). Quality-of-life assessment yielded controversial results. CONCLUSIONS: Applying the GRADE approach, the available evidence on efficacy and safety of HIFU in prostate cancer is of very low quality, mainly due to study designs that lack control groups. More research is needed to explore the use of HIFU in prostate cancer.