Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.537
Filter
1.
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J ; 24(2): 194-202, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38828255

ABSTRACT

Objectives: This study aimed to assess the prevalence of workplace violence (WPV) against nurses in Oman's psychiatric hospitals and explore associated factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted between October and December 2021 and included all tertiary mental healthcare hospitals in Oman (Al Masarra Hospital and Sultan Qaboos University Hospital, Muscat, Oman). The participants completed a sociodemographic survey and a questionnaire on WPV in the health sector. Results: A total of 106 participants (response rate = 80.3%) were included in this study. Most were female (52.8%) and Omani (72.6%) and aged 30-39 years. WPV prevalence was high (90.6%), with verbal (86.8%) and physical violence (57.5%) being the most common types. WPV incidents were more frequent on weekdays (26.4%) and during morning shifts (34%), while 81.1% of the nurses worked in shifts and had direct physical contact with patients (83.0%). The majority (92.5%) were aware of standardised WPV reporting procedures and 89.7% confirmed the presence of such procedures in hospitals. WPV was more prevalent among nurses in inpatient wards (P = 0.047). Conclusion: WPV against nurses in Omani psychiatric hospitals is alarmingly high. Future studies should investigate contributing factors among healthcare providers and emphasise violence prevention by providing staff nurses with effective training to handle violent incidents involving psychiatric patients.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Psychiatric , Workplace Violence , Humans , Oman/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Workplace Violence/statistics & numerical data , Workplace Violence/psychology , Adult , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Prevalence , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Nurses/psychology , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(6): e2417131, 2024 Jun 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922620

ABSTRACT

Importance: There is a need for representative research on serious adverse outcomes following discharge from psychiatric hospitalization. Objective: To compare rates of premature death, suicide, and nonlethal intentional self-harm after psychiatric discharge with rates in the general population and investigate associations of these outcomes with relevant variables associated with the index psychiatric hospitalization. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study included all residents from Catalonia, Spain (7.6 million population), who had psychiatric hospitalizations between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018, and were older than 10 years at the index (first) hospitalization. Follow-up was until December 31, 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from December 1, 2022, through April 11, 2024. Exposures: Socioeconomic status, psychiatric diagnoses, duration of index hospitalization, and number of previous psychiatric hospitalizations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Postdischarge premature death (ie, all-cause death before age 70 years) and suicide (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision [ICD-10] code range X60-X84), identified using mortality data, and postdischarge nonlethal intentional self-harm, identified using electronic health record and self-harm case register data. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) compared rates of premature death and suicide between the cohort and the general population. Fully adjusted, multivariable, cause-specific Cox proportional hazards regression models for the 3 outcomes were fitted. Results: A total of 49 108 patients discharged from psychiatric hospitalization were included (25 833 males [52.6%]; mean [SD] age at discharge, 44.2 [18.2] years). During follow-up, 2260 patients (4.6%) died prematurely, 437 (0.9%) died by suicide, and 4752 (9.7%) had an episode of nonlethal intentional self-harm. The overall SMR for premature death was 7.5 (95% CI, 7.2-7.9). For suicide, SMR was 32.9 (95% CI, 29.9-36.0) overall and was especially high among females (47.6 [95% CI, 40.2-54.9]). In fully adjusted sex-stratified hazard models, postdischarge premature death was associated with cognitive disorders (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 2.89 [95% CI, 2.24-3.74] for females; 2.59 [95% CI, 2.17-3.08] for males) and alcohol-related disorders (AHR, 1.41 [95% CI, 1.18-1.70] for females; 1.22 [95% CI, 1.09-1.37] for males). Postdischarge suicide was associated with postdischarge intentional self-harm (AHR, 2.83 [95% CI, 1.97-4.05] for females; 3.29 [95% CI, 2.47-4.40] for males), with depressive disorders (AHR, 2.13 [95% CI, 1.52-2.97]) and adjustment disorders (AHR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.32-2.83]) among males, and with bipolar disorder among females (AHR, 1.94 [95% CI, 1.21-3.09]). Postdischarge intentional self-harm was associated with index admissions for intentional self-harm (AHR, 1.95 [95% CI, 1.73-2.21] for females; 2.62 [95% CI, 2.20-3.13] for males) as well as for adjustment disorders (AHR, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.33-1.65] for females; 1.99 [95% CI, 1.74-2.27] for males), anxiety disorders (AHR, 1.24 [95% CI, 1.10-1.39] for females; 1.36 [95% CI, 1.18-1.58] for males), depressive disorders (AHR, 1.54 [95% CI, 1.40-1.69] for females; 1.80 [95% CI, 1.58-2.04] for males), and personality disorders (AHR, 1.59 [95% CI, 1.46-1.73] for females; 1.43 [95% CI, 1.28-1.60] for males). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients discharged from psychiatric hospitalization, risk for premature death and suicide was significantly higher compared with the general population, suggesting individuals discharged from psychiatric inpatient care are a vulnerable population for premature death and suicidal behavior.


Subject(s)
Mortality, Premature , Patient Discharge , Self-Injurious Behavior , Suicide , Humans , Male , Female , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Self-Injurious Behavior/epidemiology , Adult , Retrospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/psychology , Aged , Adolescent , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Young Adult , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data
3.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(24): e38564, 2024 Jun 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38875386

ABSTRACT

Psychiatric patients exhibit a higher rate of missed appointments compared to other medical specialities, leading to provider frustration, increased relapse, and suboptimal outcomes. This study investigates the patterns and correlates of missed appointments among outpatients at the Federal Neuropsychiatric Hospital in Calabar, Nigeria. A cross-sectional study involving 403 consecutive outpatient clinic attendees was conducted. The study questionnaire inquired about sociodemographic characteristics and hospital utilization. The Oslo Social Support Scale, the Internalized Stigma of Mental Illness Scale, the Perceived Devaluation and Discrimination Scale, and the Treatment Perception Questionnaire were administered. The mean participant age was 36.19 years (SD = 11.25), with females constituting 52.6%. Missed appointments occurred in 16.6%. The primary reasons for missed appointments included financial difficulties, forgetfulness, and distance to the hospital. Factors significantly associated with missed appointments were marital status (married), having children, believing appointments were too frequent, medication nonadherence, and concerns about medication cost (P < .05). Additionally, individuals who received unorthodox or delayed traditional care during their first mental health episode were more likely to miss appointments (P < .05). Missed appointments are prevalent among psychiatric patients, often attributed to financial challenges, forgetfulness, and geographical barriers to the hospital. Some of these factors are modifiable, suggesting targeted interventions in adherence improvement programs are needed.


Subject(s)
Appointments and Schedules , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders , Humans , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Male , Adult , Nigeria , Middle Aged , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Social Stigma , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
4.
Nord J Psychiatry ; 78(5): 448-455, 2024 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38626028

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Even if coercive measures are widely applied in psychiatry and have numerous well-known drawbacks, there is limited known on the agreement among mental healthcare professionals' opinions on their use. In a questionnaire study using standardized scenarios, we investigated variation in staff opinions on coercion. METHODS: In a web-based survey distributed to staff at three psychiatry hospitals, respondents were asked to consider if and what coercion to use by introducing two hypothetical scenarios involving involuntary psychiatric admission and in-hospital coercion. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-two out of 601 invited staff members responded to the survey (Response Rate = 22%). There was large variation in participating staff members' opinions on how to best manage critical situations and what coercive measures were warranted. In the first scenario, 57% of respondents (n = 76) believed that the patient should be involuntarily admitted to hospital while the remaining respondents believed that the situation should be managed otherwise. Regarding the second scenario, 62% of respondents responded that some in-hospital coercion should be used. The majority of respondents believed that colleagues would behave similarly (60%) or with a tendency towards more coercion use (34%). Male gender, being nursing staff and having less coercion experience predicted being less inclined to choose involuntary hospital admission. CONCLUSION: There is a high degree of variation in coercion use. This study suggests that this variation persists despite staff members being confronted with the same standardized situations. There is a need for evidence-based further guidance to minimize coercion in critical mental healthcare situations.


Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Coercion , Commitment of Mentally Ill , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Middle Aged , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/psychology
5.
Asian J Psychiatr ; 96: 104047, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38640549

ABSTRACT

Psychopharmacotherapy for patients with schizophrenia in Japan has a long history of polypharmacy, which is rare worldwide but remains a critical problem. One reason for this is that clozapine was not available in Japan until 2009. We aimed to investigate the changes in psychopharmacotherapy in patients with schizophrenia over 12 years pre- and post-introduction of clozapine to clarify how psychopharmacotherapy for patients with schizophrenia has changed with the introduction of clozapine. We retrospectively collected data from the medical records of inpatients diagnosed with schizophrenia at the Okayama Psychiatric Medical Center. Chlorpromazine equivalent (CP-eq) decreased from 1276.6 mg/day in 2009 to 613.9 mg/day in 2020. The prescribed daily dose/defined daily dose (PDD/DDD) decreased from 3.0 in 2009 to 1.2 in 2020. The monotherapy rate increased from 24.4 % in 2009 to 74.6 % in 2020. Our institution began using clozapine in 2010, and the prescription rate for clozapine increased to 37.3 % in 2020. The prescription rate for more than three antipsychotics decreased from 27.8 % in 2009 to 0.8 % in 2020. The increase in clozapine prescription has contributed to an increased rate of antipsychotic monotherapy and a decreased rate of polypharmacy, promoting the optimization of schizophrenia medication. Clozapine therapy should be further promoted in Japan to reduce treatment-resistant schizophrenia due to polypharmacy as much as possible.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Clozapine , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Schizophrenia , Humans , Clozapine/therapeutic use , Schizophrenia/drug therapy , Japan , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Adult , Female , Male , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Polypharmacy
6.
Psychiatr Prax ; 51(4): 189-194, 2024 May.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38232744

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of the practice of coercive treatment in Germany after the Constiutional Court's decision in 2011. METHODS: The documented emergency treatments (N=86) and judicially approved compulsory treatments (N=62) in 2015 and 2016 at 6 hospital locations in Baden-Württemberg were retrospectively analysed. RESULTS: Patients had an average of 8 previous psychiatric hospitalisations with a cumulative duration of 645 days on average and 87% had a psychotic disorder. 34% received subsequent compulsory treatment within one year. The median duration of compulsory treatment was 15 days. 92% of the patients were taking an antipsychotic at discharge, 45% received further treatment in a day hospital or a psychiatric outpatient clinic. CONCLUSION: Coercive treatment affects a relatively small, chronically severely ill group of patients and is frequently recurrent among them. For considerable part, no consecutive treatment setting can be established after discharge.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Coercion , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Germany , Adult , Middle Aged , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Commitment of Mentally Ill/legislation & jurisprudence , Commitment of Mentally Ill/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotic Disorders/therapy , Mental Disorders/therapy , Aged , Young Adult , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data
7.
Psychiatry Res ; 330: 115560, 2023 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37956588

ABSTRACT

Racism is a social determinant of mental health which has a disproportionally negative impact on the experiences of psychiatric inpatients of color. Distinct differences in the physical space and clinical settings of two inpatient buildings at a hospital system in the tristate (New York, New Jersey, Connecticut) area of the United States led to the present investigation of racial inequities in the assignment of patients to specific buildings and units. Archival electronic medical record data were analyzed from over 18,000 unique patients over a period of six years. Hierarchical logistic regression analyses were conducted with assigned building (old vs. new building) as the binary outcome variable. Non-Hispanic White patients were set as the reference group. Black, Hispanic/Latinx, and Asian patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to better resourced units in the new building. When limiting the analysis to only general adult units, Black and Hispanic/Latinx patients were significantly less likely to be assigned to units in the new building. These results suggest ethnoracial inequities in patient assignment to buildings which differed in clinical and physical conditions. The findings serve as a call to action for hospital systems to examine the ways in which structural racism impact clinical care.


Subject(s)
Healthcare Disparities , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Racism , Social Determinants of Health , Adult , Humans , Black People , Hispanic or Latino , Inpatients/psychology , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Racial Groups/ethnology , Racial Groups/psychology , Racial Groups/statistics & numerical data , Racism/ethnology , Racism/statistics & numerical data , United States , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Social Determinants of Health/ethnology , Social Determinants of Health/statistics & numerical data , White , Asian , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data
8.
Article in English, Portuguese | LILACS, BDENF - Nursing | ID: biblio-1516831

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: analisar os tratamentos e desfechos nos internados no Hospital do Juquery no período de 1930 a 1945. Métodos: estudo quanti-qualitativo, exploratório-descritivo, análise dos dados pelo referencial da análise documental. Coleta dos dados foi realizada no Acervo do Patrimônio Histórico-cultural do Complexo Hospitalar do Juquery, entre março e julho de 2022.Resultados: analisados 2.166 prontuários; 920 prontuários sem dados de tratamentos; 213 sem definição de tratamentos; principais tipos de tratamento 494 monoterapia e 235 politerapia; 2.005 prontuários sem dados dos efeitos dos tratamentos. Quanto ao resultado 106 inalterado/não melhorou, 21 melhorou, 18 piorou, 16 morte súbita. Houve 366 desfechos sem dados, 868 óbitos dos quais 496 não especificados, 263 saídas sem alta, 365 saídas com alta, evadidos 36 e 252 transferidos para outras instituições psiquiátricas. Conclusão: os tratamentos eram majoritariamente orgânicos e não produziram resultados efetivos; desfechos apontam para inadequação e ineficiência da assistência psiquiátrica e da internação.


Objective: to analyze the treatments and outcomes of patients admitted to the Juquery Hospital from 1930 to 1945. Methods: quanti-qualitative, exploratory-descriptive study, data analysis by the reference of documentary analysis. Data collection was carried out in the Historical-Cultural Heritage Collection of the Juquery Hospital Complex, between March and July 2022. Results: 2,166 medical records were analyzed; 920 medical records without treatment data; 213 without definition of treatments; main types of treatment: 494 monotherapy and 235 polytherapy; 2,005 medical records without data on the effects of treatments. Regarding outcome: 106 unchanged/not improved, 21 improved, 18 worsened, 16 sudden death. There were 366 outcomes without data, 868 deaths of which 496 unspecified, 263 discharged, 365 discharged, 36 absconded and 252 transferred to other psychiatric institutions. Conclusion: treatments were mostly organic and did not produce effective results; outcomes point to inadequacy and inefficiency of psychiatric care and hospitalization.


Objetivos:analizar los tratamientos y resultados de los pacientes ingresados en el Hospital de Juquery de 1930 a 1945. Métodos: estudio cuantitativo-cualitativo, exploratorio-descriptivo, análisis de datos por la referencia del análisis documental. La recolección de datos se realizó en la Colección de Patrimonio Histórico-Cultural del Complejo Hospitalario Juquery, entre marzo y julio de 2022. Resultados: se analizaron 2.166 historias clínicas; 920 historias clínicas sin datos de tratamiento; 213 sin definición de tratamientos; principales tipos de tratamiento: 494 monoterapia y 235 politerapia; 2.005 historias clínicas sin datos sobre los efectos de los tratamientos. En cuanto al resultado: 106 sin cambios/no mejoría, 21 mejoría, 18 empeoramiento, 16 muerte súbita. Hubo 366 desenlaces sin datos, 868 fallecimientos de los cuales 496 sin especificar, 263 dados de alta, 365 dados de alta, 36 fugados y 252 trasladados a otras instituciones psiquiátricas. Conclusión: los tratamientos fueron en su mayoría orgánicos y no produjeron resultados eficaces; los resultados apuntan a la inadecuación e ineficacia de la atención psiquiátrica y la hospitalización.


Subject(s)
Psychiatry/history , Medical Records/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Assistance
9.
Lancet Psychiatry ; 9(1): 35-45, 2022 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34822758

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: A childhood cancer diagnosis and treatment-induced somatic late effects can affect the long-term mental health of survivors. We aimed to explore whether childhood cancer survivors are at higher risk of psychiatric disorders later in life than their siblings and the general population. METHODS: In this register-based cohort study (part of the Socioeconomic Consequences in Adult Life after Childhood Cancer [SALiCCS] research programme), we included 5-year survivors of childhood cancer diagnosed before 20 years of age between Jan 1, 1974 and Dec 31, 2011, in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. In Denmark and Sweden, 94·7% of individuals were born in a Nordic country (ie, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway, or Sweden); similar information was not available in Finland. Data on ethnicity were not collected. Survivors were compared with their siblings and randomly selected individuals from the general population who were matched to the survivors by year of birth, sex, and geographical region. We followed up our study population from 5 years after the childhood cancer diagnosis or corresponding calendar date for matched individuals (the index date) until Aug 11, 2017, and assessed information on hospital contacts for any and specific psychiatric disorders. For siblings, the index date was defined as 5 years from the date on which they were of the same age as their sibling survivor when diagnosed with cancer. FINDINGS: The study population included 18 621 childhood cancer survivors (9934 [53·3%] males and 8687 [46·7%] females), 24 775 siblings (12 594 [50·8%] males and 12 181 [49·2%] females), and 88 630 matched individuals (47 300 [53·4%] males and 41 330 [46·6%] females). The cumulative incidence proportion of having had a psychiatric hospital contact by 30 years of age between Jan 1, 1979, and Aug 11, 2017, was 15·9% (95% CI 15·3-16·5) for childhood cancer survivors, 14·0% (13·5-14·5) for siblings, and 12·7% (12·4-12·9) for matched individuals. Despite a small absolute difference, survivors were at higher relative risk of any psychiatric hospital contact than their siblings (1·39, 1·31-1·48) and matched individuals (hazard ratio 1·34, 95% CI 1·28-1·39). The higher risk persisted at the age of 50 years. Survivors had a higher burden of recurrent psychiatric hospital contacts and had more hospital contacts for different psychiatric disorders than their siblings and the matched individuals. INTERPRETATION: Childhood cancer survivors are at higher long-term risk of psychiatric disorders than their siblings and matched individuals from the general population. To improve mental health and the overall quality of life after childhood cancer, survivorship care should include a focus on early signs of mental health problems, especially among high-risk groups of survivors. FUNDING: NordForsk, Aarhus University, Swedish Childhood Cancer Foundation, Danish Health Foundation, and Swiss National Science Foundation.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Psychiatric Department, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Cohort Studies , Denmark/epidemiology , Female , Finland/epidemiology , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Siblings , Sweden/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 21002, 2021 10 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34697335

ABSTRACT

COVID19 infection was associated with possible psychiatric manifestations, including psychosis and mania. In addition, psychiatric disorders might be triggered by severe psychological reactions to the pandemic or the measures taken to contain it. This study aimed to assess the trends of new-onset psychosis/mania during the pandemic timeline. Psychiatric emergency department records during January-July 2019 and 2020 of two regional mental health centers were manually examined. Cases of new-onset psychosis or mania were found in 326 out of 5161 records examined. The ratio of these cases increased by 45.5% in 2020 compared to 2019 (189 out of 2367, 137 out of 2479, respectively, p = 0.001). The peak increase was in April 2020 (9.4% vs. 4.7%, p = 0.015). There was no association between the rise of new-onset psychotic or manic episodes and national incidence of COVID19 cases, as observed during Israel 2nd wave. PCR tests were negative, except a single case. In this study, an increase in new-onset psychosis/mania was identified during the initial phase of the pandemic. Though causality could not be directly inferred, lack of infection symptoms, negative PCR testing and temporal distribution incongruent with COVID19 caseload did not support a direct effect of SARS-CoV-2. Alternative explanations are discussed, such as psychological reaction to stress and preventive measures, as well as case-shifting between different mental health settings.


Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Psychotic Disorders/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bipolar Disorder/psychology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing , Electronic Health Records , Emergency Service, Hospital/trends , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/trends , Humans , Israel/epidemiology , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Middle Aged , Pandemics , Psychotic Disorders/psychology , Stress, Psychological , Young Adult
11.
Am J Public Health ; 111(10): 1780-1783, 2021 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34529451

ABSTRACT

Individuals with serious mental illness are particularly vulnerable to COVID-19. The New York State (NYS) Office of Mental Health implemented patient and staff rapid testing, quarantining, and vaccination to limit COVID-19 spread in 23 state-operated psychiatric hospitals between November 2020 and February 2021. COVID-19 infection rates in inpatients and staff decreased by 96% and 71%, respectively, and the NYS population case rate decreased by 6%. Repeated COVID-19 testing and vaccination should be priority interventions for state-operated psychiatric hospitals. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(10):1780-1783. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306444).


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mass Vaccination/organization & administration , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19 Testing , Humans , New York/epidemiology , Quarantine , SARS-CoV-2 , Vulnerable Populations
13.
Sci Rep ; 11(1): 14651, 2021 07 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34282221

ABSTRACT

The debate regarding the need for hospital evacuation and the evacuation distance remains rather chaotic. Furthermore, the relationship between hospital evacuation and the prognoses of psychiatric inpatients has not yet been investigated. We aimed to reveal the association between the long-term prognosis of psychiatric inpatients evacuated immediately following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident and their backgrounds. In this retrospective cohort study, 777 psychiatric inpatients who were immediately evacuated from their hospitals following the accident were included for analysis. Survival time was the primary outcome. We conducted univariable and multivariable analyses to examine the associations between mortality and linear distance of evacuation and different backgrounds, including psychiatric/physical traits. Univariable analysis showed that the estimated survival time among patients was significantly associated with their evacuation distance. A multivariable analysis showed that a longer evacuation distance had a significantly lower hazard ratio (HR) and resulted in lower mortality. In contrast, older patients with physical complications of respiratory disease (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems 10th revision, J00-99) and genitourinary disease (N00-99) showed a significantly higher HR and had a higher mortality than patients without these complications. To prevent death among elderly psychiatric inpatients with physical comorbidities during disasters, the evacuation destination should be determined taking into consideration the evacuees' tolerance for long-distance transportation and the availability of post-evacuation care in the destination hospitals.


Subject(s)
Fukushima Nuclear Accident , Hospitals, Psychiatric , Mental Disorders/mortality , Aged , Comorbidity , Disasters , Earthquakes , Emergency Shelter/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Disorders/therapy , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Transportation of Patients/methods , Transportation of Patients/statistics & numerical data
14.
JAMA Netw Open ; 4(6): e2113637, 2021 06 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34152417

ABSTRACT

Importance: Transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals, who have a gender identity that differs from their sex assigned at birth, are at increased risk of mental health problems, including depression, anxiety, self-injurious behavior, and suicidality, relative to cisgender peers. Objective: To examine mental health outcomes among TGD vs cisgender adolescents in residential treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study's longitudinal design was used to compare groups at treatment entry and discharge, and 1-month postdischarge follow-up. The setting was an adolescent acute residential treatment program for psychiatric disorders. Participants were TGD or cisgender adolescents enrolled in the treatment program. Statistical analysis was performed October 2019 to March 2021. Exposure: Adolescents participated in a 2-week acute residential treatment program for psychiatric disorders. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were depressive (the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale [CES-D]) and anxiety (the Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children [MASC]) symptoms, and emotional dysregulation (the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale [DERS]), measured at treatment entry and discharge, and postdischarge follow-up. Age of depression onset, suicidality, self-injury, and childhood trauma also were assessed at treatment entry. Results: Of 200 adolescent participants who completed treatment entry and discharge assessments, the mean (SD) age was 16.2 (1.5) years; 109 reported being assigned female at birth (54.5%), 35 were TGD (17.5%), and 66 (49.3%) completed 1-month follow-up. TGD participants had an earlier mean (SD) age of depression onset (TGD: 10.8 [2.4] years vs cisgender: 11.9 [2.3] years; difference: 1.07 years; 95% CI, 0.14-2.01 years; P = .02), higher mean (SD) suicidality scores (TGD: 44.4 [23.1] vs cisgender: 28.5 [25.4]; difference: 16.0; 95% CI, 6.4-25.5; P = .001), more self-injurious behavior (mean [SD] RBQ-A score for TGD: 3.1 [2.5] vs cisgender: 1.7 [1.9]; difference: 1.42; 95% CI, 0.69-2.21; P = .001) and more childhood trauma (eg, mean [SD] CTQ-SF score for emotional abuse in TGD: 12.7 [5.4] vs cisgender: 9.8 [4.7]; difference: 2.85; 95% CI, 1.06-4.64; P = .002). The TGD group also had higher symptom scores (CES-D mean difference: 7.69; 95% CI, 3.30 to 12.08; P < .001; MASC mean difference: 7.56; 95% CI, 0.46 to 14.66; P = .04; and DERS mean difference: 18.43; 95% CI, 8.39 to 28.47; P < .001). Symptom scores were significantly higher at entry vs discharge (CES-D mean difference, -12.16; 95% CI, -14.50 to -9.80; P < .001; MASC mean difference: -3.79; 95% CI, -6.16 to -1.42; P = .02; and DERS mean difference: -6.37; 95% CI, -10.80 to -1.94; P = .05) and follow-up (CES-D mean difference: -9.69; 95% CI, -13.0 to -6.42; P < .001; MASC mean difference: -6.92; 95% CI, -10.25 to -3.59; P < .001; and DERS mean difference: -12.47; 95% CI, -18.68 to -6.26; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found mental health disparities in TGD youth relative to cisgender youth, with worse scores observed across assessment time points. For all participants, primary clinical outcome measures were significantly lower at treatment discharge than at entry, with no significant differences between discharge and 1-month follow-up. Given the substantial degree of mental health disparities reported in TGD individuals, these findings warrant focused clinical attention to optimize treatment outcomes in gender minority populations.


Subject(s)
Adolescent Behavior/psychology , Hospitals, Psychiatric/standards , Residential Treatment/standards , Transgender Persons/psychology , Adolescent , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/organization & administration , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Residential Treatment/methods , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Transgender Persons/statistics & numerical data , Treatment Outcome
15.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 41(4): 397-402, 2021.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34108429

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Antipsychotic (AP) polypharmacy (APP), the coprescription of more than 1 AP, is frequently practiced in psychiatric inpatients and is considered to be a risk factor for adverse drug events (ADEs). However, the association between APP and ADEs among psychiatric inpatients has not been well investigated. METHODS: The Japan Adverse Drug Events (JADE) study was a series of cohort studies conducted in several clinical settings. In particular, the JADE study for psychiatric inpatients was a retrospective cohort study of 448 psychiatric inpatients with a cumulative 22,733 patient-days. We investigated the relationship between APP, defined as a concurrent prescription of 2 or more APs and ADEs. We also assessed the relationship between potential risk factors for ADEs due to APs. RESULTS: Among the 448 patients included in this study, 106 patients (24%) had APP and the remaining 342 patients were prescribed 1 AP or none. Risperidone was the most frequent drug (25%, 109/442 AP prescriptions) used, and levomepromazine was most frequently prescribed as a concurrent medication with other APs (91%, 29/32). The median number of ADEs among the patients with APP was significantly higher than in those without APP (P = 0.001). Antipsychotic polypharmacy was a risk factor for the occurrence of first (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.54; 95% confidence interval, 1.15-2.04) and second (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.99; 95% confidence interval, 1.40-2.79) ADEs. CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotic polypharmacy was a risk factor for the occurrence of single and multiple ADEs. Antipsychotic polypharmacy should be conservatively and minimally practiced.


Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Polypharmacy , Antipsychotic Agents/administration & dosage , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Antipsychotic Agents/classification , Cohort Studies , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/diagnosis , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Female , Health Services Needs and Demand , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Male , Mental Disorders/diagnosis , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Polypharmacy/prevention & control , Polypharmacy/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/standards , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors
16.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 209(6): 415-420, 2021 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33966016

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: This study explored demographic and clinical features, plus clinical outcomes, in a smoke-free acute partial hospital (PH) among current smokers, former smokers, and those who had never smoked (nonsmokers). Compared with nonsmokers, current smokers were younger and more likely to be unmarried and unpartnered, unemployed, or receiving disability benefits. They had more prior inpatient (IP) and PH episodes. They also had more problems with interpersonal relationships, mood lability, psychosis, and substance use. Compared with nonsmokers, current smokers were more likely to miss PH treatment days and drop out. They also had longer time to readmission to PH or IP. Former smokers resembled nonsmokers, except that former smokers also had a high rate of dropout. Changes in symptoms and functioning for patients who completed PH were the same among all groups. In an acute PH setting, smoking is a marker for psychiatric and psychosocial impairment plus treatment interruption.


Subject(s)
Cigarette Smoking , Day Care, Medical/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/therapy , No-Show Patients/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Dropouts/statistics & numerical data , Socioeconomic Factors , Acute Disease , Adult , Anxiety Disorders/epidemiology , Anxiety Disorders/therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Cigarette Smoking/epidemiology , Comorbidity , Depressive Disorder/epidemiology , Depressive Disorder/therapy , Employment/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Marital Status/statistics & numerical data , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Residence Characteristics/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/epidemiology , Schizophrenia/therapy , Sex Factors
18.
Rev. chil. neuro-psiquiatr ; 59(1): 27-37, mar. 2021. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | LILACS | ID: biblio-1388375

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCCIÓN: El objetivo consiste en analizar el impacto del COVID-19 en la demanda asistencial de las urgencias y en los ingresos psiquiátricos durante el primer mes de la pandemia. MÉTODOS: Realizamos un estudio transversal observacional retrospectivo en pacientes que acuden a urgencias psiquiátricas entre el 11 de marzo y el 11 de abril de 2019 y 2020 respectivamente. Se incluyeron variables sociodemográficas y clínicas en el estudio. Se realizaron las pruebas de Chi Cuadrado o Test exacto de Fisher para el contraste de hipótesis de variables categóricas y la prueba U Mann-Whitney para el contraste de variables cuantitativas. El nivel de significación estadística se estableció en p<0.05. Los análisis se realizaron con IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTADOS: Se observa un descenso significativo de la media de pacientes atendidos al día en urgencias entre ambos periodos, siendo esta de 5,91 (±2,53) en 2019 y de 2,41 (±1,81) en 2020 (p<0.001). Se ha visto una disminución significativa de la ocupación media de camas en la UHB, ocupándose un 91,84% (±7,72) de camas en 2019 y un 58,85% (±13,81) en 2020 (p<0,001). En cuanto a la proporción de ingresos de los pacientes que acuden a urgencias, se ha visto un aumento significativo en el año 2020 respecto al año anterior. CONCLUSIONES: La demanda en la urgencia de pacientes psiquiátricos y la ocupación media de camas se ha reducido durante el primer mes tras la declaración de la pandemia. El miedo al contagio puede actuar como modulador de la demanda psiquiátrica.


INTRODUCTION: The aim is to analyze the impact of COVID-19 on the demand for emergency care and psychiatric admissions during the first month of the pandemic. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, observational and cross-sectional study. We reviewed the clinical records of all patients attending the psychiatric emergency room (ER) between March 11th and April 11th, of both 2019 and 2020. Sociodemographic and clinical variables were included in the study. Chi-square test or Fisher's exact test were performed to compare categorical variables, while U Mann-Whitney U test was used for quantitative variables. The level of statistical significance was set at p<0.05. Analysis were conducted using IBM SPSS Statistics. RESULTS: The was a significant decrease in the number of patients attended in the ER. An average of 5.91 (±2.53) patients were treated per day in 2019 compared to 2.41 (±1.81) in 2020 (p<0.001). There was also a significant decrease in the occupancy rate at the inpatient psychiatric unit, with a 91.84% (±7.72) of beds occupied in 2019 and only 58.85% (±13.81) in 2020 (p<0.001). Regarding the percentage of patients admitted after assessment in the ER, there was a significant increase in 2020 compared to the previous year. CONCLUSIONS: The demand for care in the psychiatric emergency room and the average bed occupancy have decreased during the first month after the declaration of the pandemic. Fear of contagion may act as a modulator of psychiatric demand.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , COVID-19 , Health Services Needs and Demand , Bed Occupancy/statistics & numerical data , Chi-Square Distribution , Mental Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Retrospective Studies , Emergency Medical Services/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data
19.
Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract ; 25(2): 142-146, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33143519

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Psychiatric patients are at increased risk of contamination, morbidity, and mortality associated with COVID-19, together with potentially more pronounced adverse effects. We present and discuss the adverse effects observed in an acute psychiatric clinic that has admitted COVID-19 patients during the first three months of the pandemic in Turkey. METHODS: The COVID-19 treatment schemes were formed in accordance with the national and regional guidelines at the time of admittance, which were mainly based on the use of hydroxychloroquine and other drugs. The sample consisted exclusively of inpatients, and all patients were enrolled in the study regardless of their specific diagnosis or treatment schemes. RESULTS: 4 out of 23 patients (17.4%) had experienced adverse effects, two of which had mild hepatic enzyme elevation and one had mild sinus bradycardia. Of note is that we haven't encountered any serious complications or life-threatening events during inpatient treatment. The most emphasised adverse effect in the literature, namely QTc prolongation and ECG changes, were not observed in our sample. The adverse effects were not found to be significantly associated with patient-related factors nor dose of antipsychotic medication. CONCLUSIONS: From our point of view, non-cardiac adverse effects should not be overlooked while treating comorbid psychiatric and COVID-19 patients.KEY POINTSAcute inpatient psychiatric treatment of patients who have comorbid COVID-19 is a complex situation requiring multidisciplinary action.Adverse drug reactions, which may or not result from the interaction of psychiatric and COVID-19 treatment, should be of concern for this patient group.While there is controversy over the benefits of some of the off-label COVID-19 medications, there should also be discussion over safety and concomitant medication use.In order to be adequately prepared for future escalations of COVID-19 pandemic, psychiatric services should thoroughly evaluate their initial experience with COVID-19, including from the point of drug effectiveness and safety.


Subject(s)
Antiviral Agents/adverse effects , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/etiology , Mental Disorders/drug therapy , Psychotropic Drugs/adverse effects , Adult , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Antiviral Agents/therapeutic use , COVID-19/complications , Drug Interactions , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions/epidemiology , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Mental Disorders/complications , Middle Aged , Psychotropic Drugs/administration & dosage , Psychotropic Drugs/therapeutic use
20.
CNS Spectr ; 26(3): 275-281, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32336310

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The current study sought to examine the relationship between documented social media use and suicidality and self-injurious behaviors in adolescents at the time of psychiatric hospitalization. METHODS: We retrospectively identified adolescents (aged 12-17 years) hospitalized on an inpatient psychiatric unit during 1 year. Abstracted information included documented social media use, demographic variables, documented self-injurious behaviors, the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, and the Suicide Status Form-II. Logistic regression was implemented to examine the effect of social media use on the risk of self-injurious behaviors and suicidality. RESULTS: Fifty-six adolescents who used social media were identified and matched with 56 non-social media users. Those with reported social media use had significantly greater odds of self-injurious behaviors at admission (odds ratio, 2.55; 95% confidence intervals, 1.17-5.71; P = .02) vs youth without reported social media use. Adolescents with reported social media use also had greater odds of increased suicidal ideation and suicide risk than those with no reported use, but these relationships were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Social media use in adolescents with a psychiatric admission may be associated with the risk of self-injurious behaviors and could be a marker of impulsivity. Further work should guide the assessment of social media use as part of a routine adolescent psychiatric history.


Subject(s)
Adolescent, Hospitalized/statistics & numerical data , Self Mutilation/epidemiology , Social Media/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/psychology , Adolescent , Child , Female , Hospitals, Psychiatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Internet Use/statistics & numerical data , Male , Self Mutilation/psychology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...