Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 474
Filter
1.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc ; 29(5): 1651-1658, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32728788

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to identify the epidemiological characteristics of litigation following arthroscopic procedures, performed in private practice and public hospitals in France. The secondary objective was to establish a risk profile for medical malpractice lawsuits after arthroscopic surgery. METHODS: All court decisions related to arthroscopic surgery between 1994 and 2020 were collected and reviewed cases from the two main French legal databases (Legifrance and Doctrine). Data were retrospectively collected and included: gender, joint and defendant's specialty involved, reason behind the lawsuit, initial indication and the type of arthroscopic procedure performed. The final verdicts as well as the indemnity awarded to the plaintiff (if any) were recorded. RESULTS: One-hundred eighty cases met the inclusion criteria of the study and were analyzed: 58 cases were before administrative courts and 122 were before civil courts. An orthopaedic surgeon was involved alone or in solidum in 45.6% of cases (82/180), followed by anesthesiologists in 5.6% (10/180). The private surgery center or public hospital were implicated in 63.9% (115/180) of cases. The 2 most common joints involved in litigation following arthroscopic surgery were the knee (82.2%, n = 148) and the shoulder (11.1%, n = 20). The main reasons behind the lawsuit were related to postoperative infection in 78/180 cases and to a musculoskeletal complication in 45/180 cases (25%). A failure to inform was also reported in 34/180 cases (18.9%). Of the 180 cases, 122 cases (67.8%) resulted in a verdict for the plaintiff. The average indemnity award for the plaintiff was 77.984 euros [2.282-1.117.667]. A verdict for the plaintiff was significantly associated with postoperative infection or a wrong-side surgery, while technical error and musculoskeletal complications were more significantly likely to result in a verdict in favor of the defendant (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: This study evaluated and mapped lawsuits following after arthroscopic surgery in France over a period of more than 20 years. The main joint involved in lawsuits was knee. The main causes of lawsuits following arthroscopic surgery were related to postoperative infection, musculoskeletal complications and failure to inform. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Databases, Factual , Female , France/epidemiology , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Knee Joint/surgery , Male , Private Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shoulder Joint/surgery , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology
2.
J Leg Med ; 40(2): 135-170, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33137277

ABSTRACT

The federal Medicaid statute provides states an incentive to tax hospitals (even otherwise tax-exempt ones) as a means of raising revenue and then leverage federal matching funds by returning at least some of the tax back to the hospitals in the form of Medicaid supplemental payments. The potential for supplemental payments is attractive to hospitals, especially those struggling to recoup the costs of treating Medicaid and uninsured patients, and has resulted in political support from hospitals for states to create hospital "taxes" in name only-hospitals and states both end up with more money than they did when they started because of the federal match. When state officials begin to perceive, however, that nonprofit hospitals may be serving private rather than public interests, they are able to use these hospital taxes as a way to incrementally chip away at the historic governmental support provided through tax exemption by redirecting the revenue raised from the hospital tax to general fund purposes rather than Medicaid supplemental payments. This article looks at how states have been using hospital taxes and supplemental payments to balance state budgets and whether this practice is consistent with the Medicaid program objectives that make the taxes politically feasible.


Subject(s)
Budgets , Financing, Government/economics , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Medicaid/economics , State Government , Taxes/economics , Connecticut , Financing, Government/legislation & jurisprudence , History, 20th Century , Hospitals, Private/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Medicaid/history , Medicaid/legislation & jurisprudence , Social Determinants of Health , Taxes/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
3.
J Med Imaging Radiat Sci ; 51(4): 629-638, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32839139

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An essential concept that all radiographers are required to implement is the use of techniques and the provision of protective devices to minimize radiation to patients and staff. Methods to achieve this could include good communication, immobilization, beam limitation, justification for radiation exposure, shielding, appropriate distances and optimum radiographic exposures factors. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the availability and utilization of radiation protection and safety measures by medical imaging technologists (MITs) in Rwandan hospitals. METHODS: A quantitative, non-experimental descriptive design was used and data collected by means of a self-designed questionnaire. One hundred and sixteen MITs (n = 116) representing 96.67% of the total population participated in the study. RESULTS: The study found radiation safety measures were not adequately implemented in government hospitals. Only 58.62% of MITs had radiation-measuring devices, with 29% receiving dose readings inconsistently. Lead rubber aprons were available at 99.13% of the hospitals; however, 59% of the participants had never checked the integrity of the aprons. Lead rubber aprons and lead equivalent barriers were most prevalent in the facilities. CONCLUSION: The study found there was a lack of adequate radiation safety equipment. Exposure charts and immobilization devices were not adequately implemented in the hospitals. The level of education and experience of the MITs did not appear to influence the radiation safety practice significantly. There is a need for concerted efforts between the Rwanda Utilities Regulatory Authority (RURA), Ministry of Health, University of Rwanda and hospital management to improve the radiation safety culture, especially in view of the law governing radiation protection that was recently promulgated.


Subject(s)
Allied Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Safety/legislation & jurisprudence , Radiation Protection/legislation & jurisprudence , Safety Management/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Allied Health Personnel/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Patient Safety/statistics & numerical data , Protective Clothing/statistics & numerical data , Protective Devices/statistics & numerical data , Radiation Protection/methods , Radiation Protection/statistics & numerical data , Rwanda , Safety Management/methods , Safety Management/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires
6.
Health Policy Plan ; 34(1): 37-46, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30715314

ABSTRACT

The rapid diffusion of medical technologies is widely recognized as a key driver of healthcare cost escalation. The excessive duplication of technologies gives rise to the so-called medical arms race. Conventional wisdom tends to explain this phenomenon by external reimbursement mechanisms and hospitals' competitive strategies, but has largely neglected the role played by health regulations that may also affect hospitals' technology adoption decisions. This study sheds new light on the medical arms race with evidence from China, which has witnessed an unprecedented expansion of big tertiary hospitals and a keen pursuit of expensive medical technologies. Chinese hospitals aggressively pursue high-tech medical equipment as an opportunistic reaction to the peculiar health regulatory environment. By analysing a panel dataset collected from Shenzhen City, this study reveals a series of important impacts of the medical arms race in Chinese public hospitals. High-tech medical equipment is found to lead to an increase in hospital revenues and patient volumes, but no significant impact is noted on unit costs. While high-tech medical equipment is associated with a discernible improvement in clinical outcomes, no contribution to hospitals' operational efficiency is noted. These findings are interpreted in the context of the broader health regulatory framework and China's public hospital reforms.


Subject(s)
Biomedical Technology/economics , Economic Competition , Economics, Hospital , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , China , Efficiency, Organizational , Health Policy , Hospital Administration/methods , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans
7.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 91, 2019 Jan 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30660180

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2014, the Ethiopian government passed a new smoking legislation that banned smoking in public and workplaces including health care facilities. However, data's on level of non-compliance and associated factors with non-compliance towards smoke-free legislation in hospital settings of the country has not been studied yet. METHODS: Hospital-based Cross-sectional study design triangulated with observational study was conducted in five hospitals. Data were collected through direct observation and interviews using checklist, structured and pre-tested questionnaires for observational study and survey of hospital employee respectively. Nine data collectors and one supervisor were involved in data collection. Three hundred fifty (350) health care staffs were interviewed. Fifteen (15) buildings were purposively observed for observational non-compliance in the selected hospitals. Data were entered by Epi Info and analyzed using SPSS version 21 software. Logistic regression was used to compute the crude and adjusted odds ratios for the factors affecting employee non-compliance with the legislation. A p-value of < 0.05 at 95% CI was considered to be statistically significant. RESULTS: Anti-smoking signs were absent from a high proportion of hospital areas (97% overall) although visible cigarette butts were generally not observed in most areas of the hospitals. Non-compliance level among health care staffs was 50(10.3%).Associated factors affecting to the non-compliance level of the staff were: being male (AOR = 5.89, p value = 0.001), having poor knowledge (AOR = 2.71, p-value = 0.022) and having Unfavorable attitudes (AOR = 6.15, p-value = 0.000). CONCLUSIONS: Non-compliance level was high and needs careful implementation for 100% smoke-free legislation in addressing knowledge and attitudes of health care staffs.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Personnel, Hospital/psychology , Smoke-Free Policy , Smoking/legislation & jurisprudence , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Ethiopia , Female , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Personnel, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Qualitative Research , Sex Factors , Smoking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
8.
Nutrients ; 10(2)2018 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29462881

ABSTRACT

(1) Background: Our aim was to conduct objective, baseline food environment audits of two major western Sydney public hospitals and compare them to recently revised state nutritional guidelines. (2) Methods: A cross-sectional assessment was conducted (June-July2017) across 14 fixed food outlets and 70 vending machines in two hospitals using an audit tool designed to assess the guideline's key food environment parameters of availability, placement, and promotion of 'Everyday' (healthy) and 'Occasional' (less healthy) products. (3) Results: Availability: Overall, Everyday products made up 51% and 44% of all products available at the two hospitals. Only 1/14(7%) fixed outlets and 16/70(23%) vending machines met the guideline's availability benchmarks of ≥75% Everyday food and beverages. Proportion of Everyday products differed among different types of food outlets (café, cafeteria, convenience stores). Placement: On average, food outlets did not meet recommendations of limiting Occasional products in prominent positions, with checkout areas and countertops displaying over 60% Occasional items. Promotion: Over two-thirds of meal deals at both hospitals included Occasional products. (4) Conclusion: Baseline audit results show that substantial improvements in availability, placement, and promotion can be made at these public hospitals to meet the nutrition guidelines. Audits of other NSW hospitals using the developed tool are needed to investigate similarities and differences in food environment between sites. These findings highlight the need for ongoing tracking to inform whether the revised guidelines are leading to improved food environments in health facilities.


Subject(s)
Beverages , Commerce , Food Dispensers, Automatic , Food Services , Food Supply , Hospitals, Public , Nutritive Value , Beverages/adverse effects , Beverages/standards , Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Food Dispensers, Automatic/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Dispensers, Automatic/standards , Food Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Services/standards , Food Supply/legislation & jurisprudence , Food Supply/standards , Guideline Adherence , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/standards , Humans , New South Wales , Policy Making , Portion Size , Recommended Dietary Allowances , Snacks
9.
Rev. calid. asist ; 32(4): 200-208, jul.-ago. 2017. tab, graf
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-164248

ABSTRACT

Objetivo. Analizar la legibilidad de los documentos de consentimiento informado (DCI) empleados en la red de hospitales públicos de España para verificar su intrínseca función de informar de forma comprensible a las personas en situación de decisión sanitaria. Material y métodos. Estudio descriptivo transversal. Se recibieron un total de 11.339 consentimientos informados (DCI) en castellano. De ellos, 1.617 DCI fueron recibidos a través de contacto telefónico y/o email desde marzo del 2012 hasta febrero del 2013. La legibilidad se analizó mediante el instrumento Inflesz. Mediante muestreo aleatorio simple fueron seleccionados y evaluados 372 DCI. Se obtuvieron los índices de legibilidad: escala Inflesz e índice de Flesch-Szigriszt. Resultados. El 62,4% de los DCI se situaban en la escala «algo difícil», el 23,4% en «normal» y el 13,4% en «muy difícil». La media de legibilidad Flesch más alta residía en Andalucía (=56,9) y Valencia (=51,9). Las CC. AA. con menor media de legibilidad Flesch eran: Galicia (=40,7) y Melilla (=41,8). Conclusiones. El nivel de legibilidad de los consentimientos informados de España debería mejorarse ya que no poseían puntuaciones clasificables como normales en los índices de legibilidad empleados. Asimismo, existía una gran variabilidad en la legibilidad de los DCI en el territorio español. Este hecho mostró una inequidad en el acceso a la información de los ciudadanos, ya que dependiendo de su lugar de residencia, obtuvieron DCI con mayor o menor nivel de legibilidad (AU)


Purpose. To analyse the readability of informed consent forms (ICF) used in Public Hospitals throughout Spain, with the aim of checking their function of providing comprehensive information to people who are making any health decision no matter where they are in Spain. Material and methods. A descriptive study was performed on a total of 11,339 ICF received from all over Spanish territory, of which 1617 ICF were collected from 4 web pages of Health Portal and the rest (9722) were received through email and/or telephone contact from March 2012 to February 2013. The readability level was studied using the Inflesz tool. A total of 372 ICF were selected and analysed using simple random sampling. The Inflesz scale and the Flesch-Szigriszt index were used to analyse the readability. Results. The readability results showed that 62.4% of the ICF were rated as a "little difficult", the 23.4% as "normal", and the 13.4% were rated as "very difficult". The highest readability means using the Flesch index were scored in Andalusia with a mean of 56.99 (95% CI; 55.42-58.57) and Valencia with a mean of 51.93 (95% CI; 48.4-55.52). The lowest readability means were in Galicia with a mean of 40.77 (95% CI; 9.83-71.71) and Melilla, mean=41.82 (95% CI; 35.5-48.14). Conclusions. The readability level of Spanish informed consent forms must be improved because their scores using readability tools could not be classified in normal scales. Furthermore, there was very wide variability among Spanish ICF, which showed a lack of equity in information access among Spanish citizens (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Public/standards , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/standards , Informed Consent/ethics , Informed Consent/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies/statistics & numerical data , Simple Random Sampling
10.
Clin Infect Dis ; 64(suppl_2): S98-S104, 2017 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28475794

ABSTRACT

The first human H5N1 case was diagnosed in Hong Kong in 1997. Since then, experience in effective preparedness strategies that target novel influenza viruses has expanded. Here, we report on avian influenza preparedness in public hospitals in Hong Kong to illustrate policies and practices associated with control of emerging infectious diseases. The Hong Kong government's risk-based preparedness plan for influenza pandemics includes 3 response levels for command, control, and coordination frameworks for territory-wide responses. The tiered levels of alert, serious, and emergency response enable early detection based on epidemiological exposure followed by initiation of a care bundle. Information technology, laboratory preparedness, clinical and public health management, and infection control preparedness provide a comprehensive and generalizable preparedness plan for emerging infectious diseases.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Emerging/prevention & control , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Influenza in Birds/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/prevention & control , Animals , Chickens/virology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases, Emerging/virology , Hong Kong/epidemiology , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H5N1 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza in Birds/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Pandemics/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/prevention & control , Poultry Diseases/virology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/epidemiology , Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome/virology
11.
Soins ; 61(809): 28-32, 2016 Oct.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27814802

ABSTRACT

Public hospitals are subject to specific regulations with regard to secularism, which must respect the nursing staff as well as the patients. The relevant legislation attempts to find a balance between freedom of belief and religious expression on the one hand, and the smooth running of the public hospital service on the other.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Secularism , France , Humans
16.
Int J Health Plann Manage ; 31(2): 148-66, 2016 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25677738

ABSTRACT

The National Assembly of Lao People's Democratic Republic (Laos) approved the Health Sector Reform Strategy in 2012, which called for an assessment as to whether Laos should introduce hospital autonomy, and if so, in which ways. The purpose of this study is to assess the status quo of hospital governance in Laos and propose policy suggestions for hospital autonomy in the country. We formulated an analytic framework for hospital autonomy based on previous work by other researchers, collected qualitative data through key informant interviews and focus group discussions, and also performed secondary data analysis. Public hospitals in Laos enjoyed some informal autonomy with little accountability and Laos is facing key challenges of hospital governance. As a result, introducing hospital autonomy in Laos could bring risks, benefits and debates. Before Laos decides on granting autonomy to its public hospitals, we strongly suggest that the government do pilot in selected public hospitals with well-regulated governance framework first and conduct rigorous evaluations to examine whether the granted autonomy leads to the intended social goals of equity, quality, efficiency and sustainability. We recommend residual claimants should be monitored by the government and by the society with open and transparent approach, and active measures should be taken to improve performance and ensure social functions. The study findings may also provide some suggestions for low- and middle-income countries, which are contemplating the introduction of hospital autonomy in the public sector. Copyright © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.


Subject(s)
Legislation, Hospital , Delivery of Health Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Care Reform/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Expenditures , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospital Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Humans , Insurance, Health/legislation & jurisprudence , Insurance, Health/organization & administration , Laos , Legislation, Hospital/organization & administration , Policy Making
17.
Health Policy ; 119(8): 1086-95, 2015 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26001299

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This contribution is a response to the current issue of corporate governance in hospitals in the Czech Republic, which draw a significant portion of funds from public health insurance. This not only has a significant impact on the economic efficiency of hospitals, but ultimately affects the whole system of healthcare provision in the Czech Republic. Therefore, the effectiveness of the corporate governance of hospitals might affect the fiscal stability of the health system and, indirectly, health policy for the whole country. OBJECTIVES: The main objective of this paper is to evaluate the success of the transformation in connection with the performance of corporate governance in hospitals in the Czech Republic. Specifically, there was an examination of the management differences in various types of hospitals, which differed in their ownership structure and legal form. METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A sample of 100 hospitals was investigated in 2009, i.e., immediately after the transformation had been completed, and then three years later in 2012. With regard to the different public support of individual hospitals, the operating subsidies were removed from the economic results of the corporations in the sample. The adjusted economic results were first of all examined in relationship to the type of hospital (according to owner and legal form), and then in relation to its size, the size of the supervisory board and the education level of the senior hospital manager. A multiple median regression was used for the evaluation. FINDINGS: One of the basic findings was the fact that the hospital's legal form had no influence on economic results. Successful management in the form of adjusted economic results is only associated with the private type of facility ownership. From the perspective of our concept of corporate governance other factors were under observation: the size of the hospital, the size of the supervisory board and the medical qualifications of the senior manager had no statistically verifiable influence on the efficiency of the hospital management, though we did record certain developments as a result of the transformation process. The economic results that were reported were significantly distorted by the operating subsidies from the founder. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: The results can be used immediately on several practical levels: on the macro level as part of the state's formulation of health policy, particularly in the optimization of the structure of healthcare providers, as well as for the completion of reforms in legal forms and hospital founders, and on the micro level as part of the effective administration and governance of hospitals through corporate governance regardless of the form of ownership.


Subject(s)
Hospital Administration/legislation & jurisprudence , Ownership , Czech Republic , Economics, Hospital/legislation & jurisprudence , Economics, Hospital/organization & administration , Efficiency, Organizational/economics , Financing, Government , Governing Board/economics , Governing Board/organization & administration , Hospital Administration/methods , Hospitals, Private/economics , Hospitals, Private/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Private/organization & administration , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Humans , Ownership/legislation & jurisprudence , Ownership/organization & administration
18.
Med Lav ; 106(3): 186-205, 2015 May 04.
Article in Italian | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25951865

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Needlesticks and cuts are the most common occupational injuries in healthcare workers (HCWs). Directive 2010/32/EU defines principles and preventive interventions. OBJECTIVES: To assess, in hospitals participating in the Italian Study on Occupational Risk of HIV (SIROH) project, which are very active in prevention, the degree of application of the measures provided for by the Directive, prior to its incorporation into Italian law. METHODS: An open questionnaire covering the 9 focal points of the Directive, as a guide for a presentation at the SIROH meeting in 2013. RESULTS: Of 100 SIROH hospitals, 97% and 96% respectively provide specific information and education initiatives (54% and 73% of which expressly for new employees). All centres reinforce the ban on recapping, and 30 monitor its application by inspecting sharps containers; all hospitals place containers on mobile trolleys and 78 provide operating procedures for their replacement; all introduced at least one needlestick-prevention device (NPD; 4 on average, range 1-11), most frequently intravenous catheters (91%) and winged needles (87%), but 39% only in selected units; 14 centres implemented initiatives to eliminate unnecessary needles. Regarding hepatitis B, all centres screen and vaccinate HCWs but only 78% monitor their response: 89% of HCWs were immunized. Post-exposure management protocols, although based on the same rationale, differ significantly causing considerable differences in  costs. CONCLUSIONS: Most of the preventive interventions covered by the Directive were implemented in SIROH hospitals. It is necessary to invest in NPD availability and dissemination, elimination of unnecessary needles, and streamline post-exposure protocols. The situation in the remaining Italian facilities should be investigated.


Subject(s)
Health Personnel , Hospitals/statistics & numerical data , Legislation, Hospital , Needlestick Injuries/prevention & control , Occupational Diseases/prevention & control , Occupational Exposure/prevention & control , Algorithms , European Union , Guideline Adherence/legislation & jurisprudence , Guidelines as Topic , HIV Infections/prevention & control , Health Personnel/legislation & jurisprudence , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B Vaccines/administration & dosage , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, University/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, University/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Italy/epidemiology , Needlestick Injuries/epidemiology , Occupational Diseases/epidemiology , Occupational Exposure/legislation & jurisprudence , Occupational Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Risk Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires
19.
Gac Sanit ; 29(4): 274-81, 2015.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25869155

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the technical efficiency of traditional public hospitals without their own legal identity and subject to administrative law, and that of public enterprise hospitals, with their own legal identities and partly governed by private law, all of them belonging to the taxypayer-funded health system of Andalusia during the period 2005 -2008. METHODS: The study included the 32 publicly-owned hospitals in Andalusia during the period 2005-2008. The method consisted of two stages. In the first stage, the indices of technical efficiency of the hospitals were calculated using Data Envelopment Analysis, and the change in total factor productivity was estimated using the Malmquist index. The results were compared according to perceived quality, and a sensitivity analysis was conducted through an auxiliary model and bootstrapping. In the second stage, a bivariate analysis was performed between hospital efficiency and organization type. RESULTS: Public enterprises were more efficient than traditional hospitals (on average by over 10%) in each of the study years. Nevertheless, a process of convergence was observed between the two types of organizations because, while the efficiency of traditional hospitals increased slightly (by 0.50%) over the study period, the performance of public enterprises declined by over 2%. DISCUSSION: The possible reasons for the greater efficiency of public enterprises include their greater budgetary and employment flexibility. However, the convergence process observed points to a process of mutual learning that is not necessarily efficient.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Public , Efficiency , Efficiency, Organizational , Hospitals, Public/classification , Hospitals, Public/economics , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Organizational Innovation , Quality of Health Care , Spain
20.
Enferm. glob ; 14(37): 310-318, ene. 2015. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-131079

ABSTRACT

Objetivo: Verificar las instalaciones físicas de los hospitales públicos de la ciudad de João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil, con el fin de mejorar el acceso de las personas con discapacidad. Metodología: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, exploratorio, con abordaje cuantitativo, realizado en cuatro hospitales públicos en João Pessoa-PB. Los datos fueron recolectados a través de la técnica de la observación sistemática, utilizando un cuestionario estructurado por el investigador con la información contenida en la ABNT NBR 9050. Resultados: Los resultados mostraron irregularidades de los hospitales en relación con la estructura física recomendada por la ABNT NBR 9.050/2004. Conclusión: Por lo tanto, se sugiere que las instituciones de salud se adapten a las mejoras en materia de accesibilidad para que las personas con discapacidad física puedan ejercer sus derechos como ciudadanos, garantizando la seguridad, la autonomía y el bienestar (AU)


Objetivo: verificar as instalações físicas de hospitais públicos no município de João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brasil, com vista para melhorias ao acesso de pessoas com deficiência. Metodologia: trata-se de um estudo descritivo, exploratório com abordagem quantitativa, realizado em quatro hospitais públicos de João Pessoa-PB. Os dados foram coletados por meio da técnica de observação sistemática, utilizando um instrumento estruturado através da pesquisadora, com informações contidas na norma NBR 9050 da ABNT. Resultados: os resultados obtidos mostraram irregularidades dos hospitais em relação à estrutura física recomendada pela norma NBR 9.050/2004 da ABNT. Conclusão: desse modo sugere-se que as instituições de saúde se adequem a melhorias no tocante a acessibilidade, para que as pessoas com deficiência física exerçam seus direitos como cidadãos, garantindo segurança, autonomia e bem-estar


Objective: Check the physical facilities of public hospitals in the city of João Pessoa, Paraíba, Brazil, in order to improve the access of people with disabilities. Methodology: This was a descriptive, exploratory study with a quantitative approach, conducted in four public hospitals in João Pessoa-PB. Data were collected through systematic observation technique, using a structured questionnaire by the researcher with the information contained in ABNT NBR 9050. Results: The results showed irregularities of hospitals in relation to the physical structure recommended by the ABNT NBR 9.050/2004. Conclusion: Thus it is suggested that health institutions suited to improvements regarding accessibility for people with disabilities to exercise their rights as citizens, ensuring security, autonomy and well-being (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Disabled Persons/education , Disabled Persons/legislation & jurisprudence , Health of the Disabled , Hospitals, Public/methods , Hospitals, Public/organization & administration , Hospitals, Public , Hospitals, Public/legislation & jurisprudence , Hospitals, Public/trends , Architectural Accessibility/legislation & jurisprudence , Health Services Accessibility/organization & administration , Health Services Accessibility/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...