Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 4.273
Filter
1.
BMC Oral Health ; 24(1): 540, 2024 May 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720327

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effect of concentrated growth factor (CGF) combined with sodium hyaluronate (SH) on temporomandibular joint osteoarthritis (TMJOA). METHODS: Sixty patients with TMJOA who were diagnosed by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) between March 2020 and March 2023 at the Stomatological Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University were randomly divided into a control group (n = 30) and an experimental group (n = 30). The patients in the experimental group were treated with CGF + SH, and those in the control group were treated with SH only. The visual analogue scale (VAS) score indicating pain in the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) area; the Helkimo Clinical Dysfunction Index (Di); and changes in condylar CBCT at the first visit and 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were recorded. The CBCT data of the patients in the experimental and control groups were collected, and the three-dimensional CBCT image sequences were imported into Mimics Medical 19.0 software in DICOM format for condylar reconstruction. RESULTS: The VAS scores at 2 weeks, 3 months and 6 months after treatment were significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05), and the pain in the experimental group was significantly relieved. The Di was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05), and the clinical function of the TMJ improved. After treatment, the CBCT score was significantly lower in the experimental group than in the control group (P < 0.05), and the condylar bone cortex was obviously repaired. Observation of the condylar bone cortex by three-dimensional reconstruction showed the same results as those obtained by CBCT. CONCLUSION: CGF combined with SH is effective in the treatment of TMJOA and can improve muscle pain, TMJ pain, Impaired TMJ function, Impaired range of movement, Pain on movement of the mandible and promote bone repair. THE REGISTRATION NUMBER (TRN): ChiCTR2400082712. THE DATE OF REGISTRATION: April 5, 2024.


Subject(s)
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Osteoarthritis/diagnostic imaging , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/drug therapy , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Middle Aged , Pain Measurement , Intercellular Signaling Peptides and Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
2.
Klin Padiatr ; 236(3): 180-188, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38729129

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Oral mucositis is one of the side effects developed post-hematopoietic stem cell transplant. This retrospective study aimed to assess the efficacy of a mouthwash mixture (lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, pheniramine) versus hyaluronic acid and a solution of sodium bicarbonate in terms of healing time and weight gain in the treatment of oral mucositis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with hemato-oncological malignancies. METHODS: A total of 171 patients that received chemotherapy for the hematopoietic stem cell transplant were divided into three groups; group 1, treated with a mixed mouthwash of lidocaine, sodium alginate, sucralfate, and pheniramine; group 2, treated with hyaluronic acid; and group 3, treated with an aqueous solution of 5% sodium bicarbonate. Weight and mucositis scale scores derived from medical records of patients. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in the mucositis scale scores between the groups on the transplant day and days 5, 10, 15 and 20 after the transplantation. At these measurement points, Group 2 (receiving hyaluronic acid) had a lower score, and Group 3 (who received sodium bicarbonate) had a higher score, especially on days 5 and 10 after the transplantation. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that hyaluronic acid is a more effective treatment option than the other oral care solutions that are frequently used for prophylaxis and treatment of oral mucositis.


Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Stomatitis , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Child , Stomatitis/prevention & control , Stomatitis/chemically induced , Stomatitis/drug therapy , Male , Female , Retrospective Studies , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Mouthwashes/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Sodium Bicarbonate/therapeutic use , Sodium Bicarbonate/administration & dosage , Oral Hygiene , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Lidocaine/therapeutic use , Sucralfate/therapeutic use
3.
Fr J Urol ; 34(2): 102585, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717460

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The aim was to compare the efficacy of polyacrylate polyalcohol copolymer (PPC) injections and dextranomer/hyaluronic acid (Dx/Ha) injections for the endoscopic treatment of vesicoureteral reflux in children. MATERIAL: This retrospective cohort study included 189 young patients who had endoscopic treatment for vesicoureteral reflux from January 2012 to December 2019 in our center. Among them, 101 had PCC injections and 88 had Dx/Ha injections. Indications for treatment were vesicoureteral reflux with breakthrough urinary tract infection or vesicoureteral reflux with renal scarring on dimercaptosuccinic acid (DMSA) renal scan. Endoscopic injection was performed under the ureteral meatus. Early complications, recurrence of febrile urinary tract infection and vesicoureteral reflux after endoscopic injection, ureteral obstruction and reintervention were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: Endoscopic treatment was successful in 90.1% of patients who had PPC injection and in 82% of patients who had Dx/Ha injection. Four patients presented a chronic ureteral obstruction after PPC injection, one with a complete loss of function of the dilated kidney. One patient in the Dx/Ha group presented a postoperative ureteral dilatation after 2 injections. CONCLUSION: Despite a similar success rate after PPC and Dx/Ha injections for endoscopic treatment of VUR, there may be a greater risk of postoperative ureteral obstruction after PPC injections. The benefit of using PPC to prevent febrile UTI and renal scarring in children with low-grade VUR does not seem to outweigh the risk of chronic ureteral obstruction.


Subject(s)
Dextrans , Hyaluronic Acid , Ureteral Obstruction , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux , Humans , Vesico-Ureteral Reflux/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Female , Male , Dextrans/therapeutic use , Dextrans/administration & dosage , Dextrans/adverse effects , Child, Preschool , Treatment Outcome , Infant , Acrylic Resins/therapeutic use , Acrylic Resins/administration & dosage , Child , Injections , Cohort Studies , Ureteroscopy/adverse effects
4.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 211, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38696090

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of sodium hyaluronate drops on dry eye parameters and corneal epithelial thickness following cataract surgery. METHODS: The study included 84 patients who underwent uncomplicated phacoemulsification. In Group A, 0.15% sodium hyaluronate drops were added to the postoperative antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment. In Group B, only antibiotic/anti-inflammatory treatment was applied. Preoperatively and at 1 week and 1 month postoperatively, all the patients were evaluated in respect of tear break-up time (TBUT), the Schirmer test under anesthesia, the corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score, mean central corneal thickness (CCT) and mean central corneal epithelial thickness (CCET), and the two groups were compared. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was determined between the two groups at postoperative 1 month in respect of TBUT, Schirmer test, CFS score, and CCET (p < 0.01). In Group A, a statistically significant increase was determined in the TBUT and Schirmer values at 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01, p = 0.01, respectively) and in Group B, these values were decreased compared to preoperatively (p < 0.01). The CCET was determined to be significantly thinner in Group B 1 month postoperatively (p < 0.01). A significant increase in CCT was observed in both groups at postoperative 1 week (p < 0.01) and preoperative values were reached at 1 month postoperatively. CONCLUSION: In the patient group using sodium hyaluronate, significant differences were determined in all dry eye parameters and CCET. The use of hyaluronate sodium drops after cataract surgery was seen to improve dry eye parameters and contribute to a healthy ocular surface by ensuring continuity of the corneal epithelium.


Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes , Epithelium, Corneal , Hyaluronic Acid , Ophthalmic Solutions , Phacoemulsification , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Female , Male , Aged , Epithelium, Corneal/drug effects , Epithelium, Corneal/pathology , Middle Aged , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Phacoemulsification/methods , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Tears/metabolism , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Cataract Extraction/methods
5.
World J Urol ; 42(1): 317, 2024 May 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38740620

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To review the literature on the topic, to suggest a common line of treatment applicable across a wide community of specialists, and to contribute in maintaining the high level of interest in this disease. METHODS: A comprehensive and exhaustive review of the literature was performed, identifying hundreds of articles on the topic. RESULTS: Peyronie's disease is a condition that has been recognized, studied, and treated for centuries; despite this, if one excludes surgery in cases in which the deformity is stable, no clear treatment (or line of treatment) is available for complete relief of signs and symptoms. Treatment options were divided into local, oral, and injection therapy, and a wide variety of drugs, remedies, and options were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, vacuum therapy, penile traction therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, hyaluronic acid, and collagenase of Clostridium histolyticum may be recommended only in specific contexts. Further studies on individual options or potential combinations are required.


Subject(s)
Conservative Treatment , Penile Induration , Penile Induration/therapy , Humans , Male , Conservative Treatment/methods , Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy/methods , Phosphodiesterase 5 Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Traction/methods , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Microbial Collagenase/therapeutic use , Microbial Collagenase/administration & dosage , Practice Guidelines as Topic
6.
Int J Pharm ; 656: 124088, 2024 May 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38582102

ABSTRACT

Viscosupplementation consists of hyaluronic acid (HA) intra-articular injections, commonly applied for osteoarthritis treatment while non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely administered for pain relief. Here, HA and a NSAID (celecoxib) were combined in a formulation based on a low transition temperature mixture (LTTM) of glycerol:sorbitol, reported to increase celecoxib's solubility, thus rendering a potential alternative viscosupplement envisioning enhanced therapeutic efficiency. The inclusion of glucosamine, a cartilage precursor, was also studied. The developed formulations were assessed in terms of rheological properties, crucial for viscosupplementation: the parameters of crossover frequency, storage (G') and loss (G'') moduli, zero-shear-rate viscosity, stable viscosity across temperatures, and shear thinning behaviour, support viscoelastic properties suitable for viscosupplementation. Additionally, the gels biocompatibility was confirmed in chondrogenic cells (ATDC5). Regarding drug release studies, high and low clearance scenarios demonstrated an increased celecoxib (CEX) release from the gel (6 to 73-fold), compared to dissolution in PBS. The low clearance setup presented the highest and most sustained CEX release, highlighting the importance of the gel structure in CEX delivery. NMR stability studies over time demonstrated the LTTM+HA+CEX (GHA+CEX) gel as viable candidate for further in vivo evaluation. In sum, the features of GHA+CEX support its potential use as alternative viscosupplement.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal , Celecoxib , Drug Liberation , Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis , Viscosupplementation , Celecoxib/administration & dosage , Celecoxib/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Osteoarthritis/drug therapy , Viscosupplementation/methods , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal/chemistry , Viscosity , Transition Temperature , Rheology , Animals , Cell Line , Mice , Solubility , Glycerol/chemistry , Glucosamine/chemistry , Glucosamine/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/chemistry , Injections, Intra-Articular
7.
Int Ophthalmol ; 44(1): 193, 2024 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38653918

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: This study evaluated the tear film stability in patients with symptoms of dry eye after installation of dual polymer hydroxypropyl guar/sodium hyaluronate (DPHG/SH) vs single polymer SH. METHODS: Patients with recently diagnosed mild to moderate dry eye disease (OSDI score 23-32 points) were included. For each patient, the right eye was randomized to receive DPHG/SH or 0.15% SH. Just after the administration of the drop to the right eye, the fellow eye received the other eye drop. The first non-invasive Keratograph first break-up time (NIKBUT), average NIKBUT and tear meniscus height (TMH) were measured before administration of the eye drops, at 1-min, 15 min, 30 min, 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min after instillation. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients aged 22.8 ± 2.2 years participated in the study (21 women). No differences between the eye receiving DPHG/SH and single polymer SH were observed for the first NIKBUT (p = 0.45) and average NIKBUT (p = 0.24) variables at any time point. Both DPHG/SH and single polymer SH increased the TMH (p of time effect < 0.001), but with no difference between groups (p = 0.95). CONCLUSION: Both DPHG/SH and single polymer SH solutions provide lubrication of the eye surface, however, with no difference in NIKBUT and TMH evaluations for up to two hours following administration.


Subject(s)
Dry Eye Syndromes , Hyaluronic Acid , Ophthalmic Solutions , Tears , Humans , Dry Eye Syndromes/drug therapy , Dry Eye Syndromes/diagnosis , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Male , Ophthalmic Solutions/administration & dosage , Young Adult , Adult , Polysaccharides/administration & dosage , Polymers , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies
8.
Acta Ophthalmol ; 102(4): e443-e451, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38376121

ABSTRACT

To compare the safety and efficacy of the Preserflo Microshunt with trabeculectomy in the treatment of patients with glaucoma. A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcome measures recorded as a measure of efficacy of the interventions were intra-ocular pressure (IOP) at final follow-up and IOP reduction (IOPR). Secondary outcomes recorded to measure efficacy were reduction in the number of glaucoma medications and reinterventions. To assess safety profile, the proportions of patients with post-operative complications were recorded. Seven articles were included in this study. A total of 1353 eyes were included in this review (Preserflo: 812, trabeculectomy: 541). Post-operative IOP (mean difference [MD] = 0.78 [0.66, 0.90], p < 0.001) results are significantly lower for trabeculectomy than Preserflo. The IOPR (MD = -1.20 [-2.30, -0.09], p = 0.034) results significantly favour trabeculectomy over Preserflo Microshunt. The reduction in topical glaucoma medications (MD = -0.32 [-0.58, -0.07], p = 0.014) is significantly higher for trabeculectomy. There is no statistically significant difference in levels of hypotony (risk ratio [RR] = -0.05 [-0.47, 0.37], p = 0.806), choroidal effusion/detachment (RR = -0.12 [-0.42, 0.19], p = 0.444), hyphaema (RR = 0.20 [-0.11, 0.51], p = 0.216) and flat anterior chamber (RR = 0.49 [-1.02, 0.03], p = 0.066). There are significantly more bleb-related complications in the trabeculectomy groups than Preserflo groups (RR = -0.63 [-1.01, -0.24], p = 0.001). There were statistically more reinterventions required in the trabeculectomy groups than Preserflo groups (RR = -0.48 [-0.65, -0.30], p < 0.001). Compared to trabeculectomy, the Preserflo Microshunt is not as effective in lowering intra-ocular pressure, has a similar safety profile and has a lower reintervention rate. Further research is required given the lack of randomised controlled trials within this study and resulting low strength of evidence.


Subject(s)
Glaucoma , Intraocular Pressure , Trabeculectomy , Humans , Glaucoma/surgery , Glaucoma/physiopathology , Glaucoma Drainage Implants , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Intraocular Pressure/physiology , Prosthesis Implantation/methods , Trabeculectomy/methods , Treatment Outcome
9.
Dermatol Surg ; 50(5): 453-458, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38386847

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, hyaluronidase (HYAL) is used after hyaluronic acid (HA) injection to dissolve the undesired migration of product. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel lip augmentation technique that uses HA and HYAL simultaneously in patients who previously had HA migration. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Nine hundred twenty female patients were included. In the first group ( n = 793), HA injections were performed in subcutaneous plane of the lips. In the second group who had previous product migration ( n = 127), 7.5 units of HYAL is injected in 4 points in ergotrid area before proceeding with HA injection. RESULTS: The medicis lip fullness scale scores after 2 weeks improved in all patients, while 92% of patients perceived the results as "very much improved" with Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale ( p ˂ .001). There was no difference between 2 groups regarding the patient satisfaction rates ( p ˃.05), while filler migration was seen in 0.2% ( n : 15) of patients in the first group during the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: The new vertical injection approach provided an increased vertical height, optimal eversion, and an incisor display on the lips. The simultaneous use of HYAL before HA injection seems to be a safe and effective practice in 1-stage treatment of the previously injected lips with filler migration into ergotrid area.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Lip , Patient Satisfaction , Humans , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Retrospective Studies , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Adult , Middle Aged , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Aged , Injections, Subcutaneous , Esthetics , Treatment Outcome , Foreign-Body Migration/etiology
10.
Aesthetic Plast Surg ; 48(7): 1417-1425, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38305924

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acid (HA) dermal fillers injection is a common procedure in patients with cosmetic needs. Concomitant pain is a major complaint among patients undergoing HA filler injections. Relevant research is limited and there is no consensus on pain management of dermal filler injection. OBJECTIVES: To assist physicians in determining a more appropriate treatment approach, and to better provide treatment suggestions. METHODS: A nationwide (China) cross-sectional survey was conducted using questionnaires designed for physicians and patients, respectively. A total of 62 semi-structured questionnaires were administered to aesthetic physicians via face-to-face interview, whereas 123 online-based questionnaires were collected from patients who have ever undergone HA treatment. The collected questionnaire information was analyzed using descriptive statistics and content analysis. RESULTS: 42 (67.74%) physicians observed that over 50% of their patients were concerned about pain during injection. 101 (82.11%) of patients were concerned about impending pain ≥5 points (a total score is 10) before injection. For preferred pain relief modalities, 48 (77.42%) physicians would choose a hyaluronic acid dermal filler with lidocaine, and 82 (66.67%) patients would choose anesthetic-containing products. 59 (95.16%) physicians who injected lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid found patients had a comfortable treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: Pain management during hyaluronic acid dermal fillers injection is important from both perspectives of physicians and patients. This survey showed that compared with other analgesic methods, lidocaine-containing hyaluronic acid has offered a more satisfying experience. It also provides insights to physicians and patients in pain management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Pain Management , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Male , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Pain Management/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , China , Pain Measurement , Pain, Procedural/etiology , Pain, Procedural/diagnosis , Injections, Subcutaneous , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data
11.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1604-1612, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38318685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Restylane portfolio of soft tissue fillers spans a wide range of indications, due in part to their complementary manufacturing technologies [non-animal stabilized hyaluronic acid (NASHA) and Optimal Balance Technology (OBT/XpresHAn)]. Using an array of products, injectors can achieve a holistic, natural looking effect for their patients. However, with a wide range of products it may be difficult to choose an optimal combination. AIM: Simplify and align global use recommendations for NASHA versus OBT products. METHODS: Two pre-meeting surveys were completed by 11 key opinion leaders with international representation, with the goal of collecting information regarding their current injection practices for various anatomical regions of the face (i.e., temporal region, forehead, tear trough, lateral zygoma, anteromedial cheek, nose, pyriform aperture, nasolabial fold, perioral area, lips, labiomental crease, marionette lines, chin, and jawline). The data collected from these surveys was subsequently discussed in a consensus group meeting involving 11 voting members and 3 nonvoting members. RESULTS: Top product recommendations were identified for each anatomical area, along with secondary and tertiary recommendations that can also be used under defined circumstances. Recommendations were provided based on a consideration of elements such as patient features (e.g., skin thickness, bone structure), the desired aesthetic outcome, experience of the injector, and the preferred injection technique. CONCLUSION: A majority consensus regarding the top NASHA versus OBT product choice for each anatomical region of the face was reached. These recommendations represent international agreement regarding the use of Restylane products.


Subject(s)
Consensus , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Face , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Humans , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Cosmetic Techniques/instrumentation , Cosmetic Techniques/standards , Skin Aging/drug effects , Gels , Practice Guidelines as Topic
12.
J Oral Rehabil ; 51(6): 1061-1080, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38400536

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disc displacement (DD) has been established in different forms since over a century. Ther is a consensus to perform minimal invasive interventions as first-line surgical treatment since there are no evidence on best surgical practice yet. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to perform a complex systematic review (SR) on the topic-is there evidence for surgical treatment of TMJ DD? METHODS: The PICO was defined as DD patients (population), treated with different surgical interventions including arthrocentesis (intervention), compared with other or no treatment (control) regarding the outcome variables mandibular function, mouth opening capacity, TMJ pain, etcetera (outcome). For identification of prospective controlled trials and SRs, a search strategy was developed for application in three databases. RESULTS: The search yielded 4931 studies of which 56 fulfilled the stipulated PICO. Studies with low or moderate risk of bias were possible to include in meta-analyses. There were evidence suggesting arthrocentesis being more effective compared to conservative management (maximum interincisal opening (MIO): p < .0001, I2 = 22%; TMJ pain: p = .0003, I2 = 84%) and arthrocentesis being slightly more effective than arthrocentesis with an adjunctive hyaluronic acid injection (MIO: p = .04, I2 = 0%; TMJ pain: p = .28, I2 = 0%). Other treatment comparisons showed nonsignificant differences. The performed meta-analyses only included 2-4 studies each, which might indicate a low grade of evidence. CONCLUSION: Although arthrocentesis performed better than conservative management the findings should be interpreted cautiously, and non-invasive management considered as primary measure. Still, several knowledge gaps concerning surgical methods of choice remains.


Subject(s)
Joint Dislocations , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Temporomandibular Joint Disc , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders , Humans , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/physiopathology , Temporomandibular Joint Disorders/therapy , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Joint Dislocations/surgery , Temporomandibular Joint Disc/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Arthrocentesis/methods , Range of Motion, Articular/physiology , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Injections, Intra-Articular
13.
Arthroscopy ; 40(5): 1623-1636.e1, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331363

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of common intra-articular injections used in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis, including corticosteroid (CS), hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), and bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), with a minimum follow-up of 6-months. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines in August 2022 in the following databases: PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Controlled Trials, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. Level I to II randomized clinical trials with a minimum follow-up of 6 months that investigated the treatments of interest were included. Patient-reported outcome scores for pain and function at baseline and at latest follow-up were extracted, and the change in scores was converted to uniform 0 to 100 scales. Arm-based Bayesian network meta-analysis using a random-effects model was created to compare the treatment arms in pain and function. RESULTS: Forty-eight studies comprising a total of 9,338 knees were included. The most studied intra-articular injection was HA (40.9%), followed by placebo (26.2%), PRP (21.5%), CS (8.8%), and then BMAC (2.5%). HA and PRP both led to a significant improvement in pain compared with placebo. HA, PRP, and BMAC all led to a significant improvement in function scores when compared with placebo. Surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) of the interventions revealed that PRP, BMAC, and HA were the treatments with the highest likelihood of improvement in both pain and function, with overall SUCRA scores of 91.54, 76.46, and 53.12, respectively. The overall SUCRA scores for CS and placebo were 15.18 and 13.70, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: At a minimum 6-month follow-up, PRP demonstrated significantly improved pain and function for patients with knee osteoarthritis compared with placebo. Additionally, PRP exhibited the highest SUCRA values for these outcomes when compared with BMAC, HA, and CS. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II, meta-analysis of Level I to II studies.


Subject(s)
Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Hyaluronic Acid , Network Meta-Analysis , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Platelet-Rich Plasma , Humans , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Injections, Intra-Articular , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Pain Measurement , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Viscosupplements/therapeutic use , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Treatment Outcome
14.
J Cosmet Dermatol ; 23(5): 1613-1619, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299745

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Tear trough filling is a popular facial rejuvenation procedure, and hyaluronic acid is typically used as the filler of choice. However, Tyndall's phenomenon, a common complication following hyaluronic acid injection, can occur, leading to skin discoloration of the lower eyelid. AIMS: This single-center, prospective, comparative clinical study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of collagen and hyaluronic acid injections in treating tear trough deformity. METHODS: Sixty patients were enrolled between June 2022 and January 2023. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: Group A received hyaluronic acid, Group B received hyaluronic acid combined with collagen, and Group C received collagen alone. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, and tear trough deformity grade were considered before therapy. Changes in tear trough deformity scores, Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores, and the presence of the Tyndall effect were analyzed at 1 and 3 months postinjection to determine differences among the three groups. RESULTS: Baseline profiles of the three groups were similar. In the first month postinjection, there was no difference in the Global Aesthetic Improvement Scores and tear trough deformity between the three groups. However, in the third-month postinjection, there was a significant difference in scores between patients in Group C and those in Groups A or B. The Tyndall effect manifested in three patients in Group A, which was significantly different from that in Groups B and C. CONCLUSION: The combined use of hyaluronic acid with collagen in injectable fillers corrected tear trough deformities and reduced the occurrence of the Tyndall phenomenon, which can be problematic with hyaluronic acid alone. Additionally, this combination may help overcome the disadvantage of a shorter retention period when using collagen alone.


Subject(s)
Collagen , Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Female , Collagen/administration & dosage , Prospective Studies , Middle Aged , Adult , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Male , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , Rejuvenation , Eyelids/drug effects , Esthetics , Skin Aging/drug effects
15.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): NP402-NP410, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38366708

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The ability to degrade hyaluronic acid (HA)-based fillers with hyaluronidase allows for better management of adverse effects and reversal of suboptimal treatment outcomes. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to compare the enzymatic degradation kinetics of 16 commercially available HA-based fillers, representing 6 manufacturing technologies. METHODS: In this nonclinical study, a recently developed in vitro multidose hyaluronidase administration protocol was used to induce degradation of HA-based fillers, enabling real-time evaluation of viscoelastic properties under near-static conditions. Each filler was exposed to repeated doses of hyaluronidase at intervals of 5 minutes to reach the degradation threshold of G' ≤ 30 Pa. RESULTS: Noticeable differences in degradation characteristics were observed based on the design and technology of different filler classes. Vycross fillers were the most difficult to degrade and the Cohesive Polydensified Matrix filler was the least difficult to degrade. Preserved Network Technology products demonstrated proportional increases in gel degradation time and enzyme volume required for degradation across the individual resilient hyaluronic acid (RHA) products and indication categories. No obvious relationship was observed between gel degradation characteristics and the individual parameters of HA concentration, HA chain length, or the degree of modification of each filler when analyzed separately; however, a general correlation was identified with certain physicochemical properties. CONCLUSIONS: Manufacturing technology was the most important factor influencing the reversibility of an HA product. An understanding of the differential degradation profiles of commercially available fillers will allow clinicians to select products that offer a higher margin of safety due to their preferential reversibility.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/metabolism , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/chemistry , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/metabolism , Dermal Fillers/chemistry , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Kinetics , Humans , Materials Testing , Viscosity , Elasticity
16.
Ophthalmic Plast Reconstr Surg ; 40(3): e80-e82, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38231591

ABSTRACT

Facial filler injections are the second most commonly performed in-office cosmetic procedure. Vision loss is the most feared complication of hyaluronic acid (HA) filler injection, but isolated ophthalmoplegia can also occur. We report the case of a 45-year-old woman who developed nausea and diplopia following HA filler injection to the bilateral periorbital region. She presented with a left hypertropia and left-sided motility deficit without vision involvement. MRI of the orbits demonstrated mild enhancement and enlargement of the left inferior rectus and inferior oblique muscles. Treatment consisted of hyaluronidase injection and oral steroids. HA filler can cause isolated ocular misalignment and diplopia without associated vision loss. Patients should be counseled on these risks before undergoing soft tissue augmentation of the face with HA filler.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Ophthalmoplegia , Humans , Female , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Ophthalmoplegia/chemically induced , Ophthalmoplegia/diagnosis , Ophthalmoplegia/etiology , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/adverse effects , Orbit , Oculomotor Muscles , Diplopia/diagnosis , Diplopia/chemically induced
18.
Aesthet Surg J ; 44(6): 647-657, 2024 May 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38262634

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hyaluronic acids (HAs) continue to be the fillers of choice worldwide and their popularity is growing. Adverse events (AEs) are able to be resolved through the use of hyaluronidase (HYAL). However, routine HYAL use has been at issue due to perceived safety issues. OBJECTIVES: There are currently no guidelines on the use of HYAL in aesthetic practice, leading to variability in storage, preparation, skin testing, and beliefs concerning AEs. This manuscript interrogated the use of this agent in daily practice. METHODS: A 39-question survey concerning HYAL practice was completed by 264 healthcare practitioners: 244 from interrogated databases and 20 from the consensus panel. Answers from those in the database were compared to those of the consensus panel. RESULTS: Compared to the database group, the consensus group was more confident in the preparation of HYAL, kept reconstituted HYAL for longer, and was less likely to skin test for HYAL sensitivity and more likely to treat with HYAL in an emergency, even in those with a wasp or bee sting anaphylactic history. Ninety-two percent of all respondents had never observed an acute reaction to HYAL. Just over 1% of respondents had ever observed anaphylaxis. Five percent of practitioners reported longer-term adverse effects, including 3 respondents who reported loss of deep tissues. Consent before injecting HA for the possible requirement of HYAL was always obtained by 74% of practitioners. CONCLUSIONS: Hyaluronidase would appear to be an essential agent for anyone injecting hyaluronic acid filler. However, there is an absence of evidence-based recommendations with respect to the concentration, dosing, and treatment intervals of HYAL, and these should ideally be available.


Subject(s)
Cosmetic Techniques , Dermal Fillers , Hyaluronic Acid , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Hyaluronoglucosaminidase/administration & dosage , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/adverse effects , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Cosmetic Techniques/adverse effects , Dermal Fillers/administration & dosage , Dermal Fillers/adverse effects , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data , Anaphylaxis/chemically induced
19.
J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil ; 37(3): 629-639, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38160332

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many formulations and dosing regimens are available for hyaluronic acid (HA). OBJECTIVE: To compare different doses of linear, high-molecular weight (HMW) HA injections among patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA). METHODS: Hundred patients were included in this randomized, single-blinded trial and randomly divided into three HA injection groups. The first group received five weekly 20 mg HA injections, the second group received three weekly 32 mg HA injections, and the third group received a single 48 mg HA injection. Patients were evaluated at baseline, 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection for pain, stiffness, and function using the visual analog scale (VAS) and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) questionnaire. Quality of life, patient's global assessment, and Timed Up and Go (TUG) test scores were also evaluated. RESULTS: There was significant improvement in the WOMAC, VAS-pain, quality of life, patient's global assessment, and TUG test mean scores at all follow-up time points (p< 0.001). However, the groups showed no significant differences in WOMAC, VAS-activity pain, and patient global scores at any follow-up point. CONCLUSION: Intra-articular injections of different doses of linear HMW HA can improve pain, stiffness, function, and quality of life in patients suffering from knee OA over a six-month period.


Subject(s)
Hyaluronic Acid , Osteoarthritis, Knee , Quality of Life , Humans , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Osteoarthritis, Knee/drug therapy , Single-Blind Method , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Injections, Intra-Articular , Prospective Studies , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Pain Measurement , Viscosupplements/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
20.
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol ; 281(6): 2883-2891, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38151540

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Patulous Eustachian tube (PET) is a condition affecting approximately 0.3% to 6.6% of the population, with autophony being the predominant complain. The management of PET lacks a well-defined standard in the literature as no effective medical treatments have been documented but various surgical options are available. This study aims to report mid-term outcomes following surgical management of PET. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent surgical intervention for PET between September 2017 and June 2022 were enrolled. Data encompassing general demographics, quality of life (GBI), and procedure-specific data were collected. RESULTS: A total of 30 PET cases (in 19 patients) underwent surgical intervention including 9 injections of hyaluronic acid, 13 fat injections, 6 endoscopic shim insertions, 1 cartilage graft, and 1 injection of hydroxy apatite. After an average follow-up of 22 ± 14 months, 16 cases (53%) achieved complete symptom relief, while 8 cases (26.6%) reported partial relief. Additionally, 11(36%) cases required multiple surgeries. No specific surgical technique demonstrated superiority. Quality of life improved in 77% of cases based on 10 out of 13 GBI collected. Recurrence of PET symptoms occurred on average 10.6 ± 9.7 months after initial surgery, with an estimated global risk of 75% at 3 years. Transient serous otitis media was observed in only 4 cases (13.3%). CONCLUSION: Surgical intervention for PET was found to be effective, achieving complete symptom relief in 53% of cases and significantly improving quality of life 2 years post-surgery. However, a substantial portion of cases necessitated one or more re-interventions. The durability of effectiveness appears to diminish over time.


Subject(s)
Ear Diseases , Eustachian Tube , Quality of Life , Humans , Eustachian Tube/surgery , Eustachian Tube/physiopathology , Female , Male , Ear Diseases/surgery , Middle Aged , Adult , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Hyaluronic Acid/administration & dosage , Hyaluronic Acid/therapeutic use , Endoscopy/methods , Otologic Surgical Procedures/methods , Cartilage/transplantation , Durapatite
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...