ABSTRACT
Chloroquine (CQ) and its analog hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were recently included in several clinical trials as potential prophylactic and therapeutic options for SARS-COV-2 infection/covid-19. However, drug effectiveness in preventing, treating, or slowing the progression of the disease is still unknown. Despite some initial promising in vitro results, rigorous pre-clinical animal studies and randomized clinical trials have not been performed yet. On the other hand, while the potential effectiveness of CQ/HCQ is, at best, hypothetical, their side effects are factual and most worrisome, particularly when considering vulnerable groups of patients being treated with these drugs. in this comment, we briefly explain the possible mechanisms of action of CQ/HCQ for treating other diseases, possible actions against covid-19, and their potent side effects, in order to reinforce the necessity of evaluating the benefit-risk balance when widely prescribing these drugs for SARS-COV-2 infection/covid-19. We conclude by strongly recommending against their indiscriminate use.
Subject(s)
Antimalarials/pharmacology , Betacoronavirus , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Antimalarials/pharmacokinetics , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , COVID-19 , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Contraindications, Drug , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Pandemics , Risk Assessment , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 Drug TreatmentABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The American Academy of Ophthalmology recommends a maximum hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) dose of ≤5.0 mg/kg/day to reduce the risk of HCQ-induced retinopathy. To determine if this dose adjustment would have an impact on the clinical course of SLE, we compared outcome measures in a cohort of patients with SLE before and after adjusting HCQ dose. METHODS: Sixty Puerto Ricans with SLE (per 1997 American College of Rheumatology criteria) treated with HCQ who were changed to HCQ ≤5.0 mg/kg/day were studied. Visits were ascertained every 6 months for 2 years before and 2 years after HCQ dose adjustment (baseline visit). Disease activity (per Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI)), SLE exacerbations, emergency room visits, hospitalisations, disease damage (per Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics/American College of Rheumatology Damage Index), corticosteroids exposure, prednisone dose and immunosuppressive drugs exposure were determined before and after HCQ dose change. RESULTS: At baseline visit, the mean age was 43.8±15.1 years. All patients were women. The mean disease duration was 13.8±9.1 years. After HCQ dose adjustment, patients required a lower prednisone dose when compared with visits before HCQ dose reduction. No significant differences were observed for mean SLEDAI scores, lupus exacerbations, emergency room visits, hospitalisations, disease damage and exposure to immunosuppressive drugs before and after HCQ dose adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that adjustment of daily HCQ dose to ≤5.0 mg/kg/day of actual body weight does not have a significant impact on the short-term and mid-term outcomes in this group of patients with SLE.
Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/drug therapy , Retinopathy of Prematurity/chemically induced , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adult , Antirheumatic Agents/pharmacokinetics , Antirheumatic Agents/therapeutic use , Comorbidity , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Hydroxychloroquine/therapeutic use , Immunosuppressive Agents/adverse effects , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic/complications , Middle Aged , Ophthalmology/organization & administration , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Prednisone/adverse effects , Prednisone/therapeutic use , Puerto Rico/epidemiology , Retinopathy of Prematurity/prevention & control , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
ABSTRACT Chloroquine (CQ) and its analog hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) were recently included in several clinical trials as potential prophylactic and therapeutic options for SARS-COV-2 infection/covid-19. However, drug effectiveness in preventing, treating, or slowing the progression of the disease is still unknown. Despite some initial promising in vitro results, rigorous pre-clinical animal studies and randomized clinical trials have not been performed yet. On the other hand, while the potential effectiveness of CQ/HCQ is, at best, hypothetical, their side effects are factual and most worrisome, particularly when considering vulnerable groups of patients being treated with these drugs. in this comment, we briefly explain the possible mechanisms of action of CQ/HCQ for treating other diseases, possible actions against covid-19, and their potent side effects, in order to reinforce the necessity of evaluating the benefit-risk balance when widely prescribing these drugs for SARS-COV-2 infection/covid-19. We conclude by strongly recommending against their indiscriminate use.
Subject(s)
Humans , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Chloroquine/pharmacology , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Betacoronavirus/drug effects , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacology , Antimalarials/pharmacology , Chloroquine/adverse effects , Chloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Risk Assessment , Pandemics , Contraindications, Drug , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19 , Hydroxychloroquine/adverse effects , Hydroxychloroquine/pharmacokinetics , Antimalarials/adverse effects , Antimalarials/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
Liquid-phase microextraction based on polypropylene hollow fibers and CE were applied for the chiral determination of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and its metabolites (desethylchloroquine, DCQ; desethylhydroxychloroquine, DHCQ; bisdesethylchloroquine, BDCQ) in human urine. The analytes were extracted from 3 mL of urine spiked with the internal standard (metoprolol) and alkalinized with 250 muL of 2 M NaOH. The analytes were extracted into 1-octanol impregnated in the pores of the hollow fiber, and into an acid acceptor solution inside the hollow fiber. The electrophoretic separations were carried out in 100 mmol/L Tris buffer (pH adjusted to 9.0 with phosphoric acid) containing 1% w/v S-beta-CD and 30 mg/mL HP-beta-CD with a constant voltage of +18 kV. The method was linear over the concentration range of 10-1000 ng/mL for each HCQ stereoisomer and 21-333 ng/mL for each metabolite stereoisomer. Within-day and between-day assay precision and accuracy for the analytes were studied at three concentration levels for each stereoisomer and were lower than 15%. The developed method was applied for the determination of the cumulative urinary excretion of HCQ, DCQ, and DHCQ after oral administration of rac-HCQ to a health volunteer. The results obtained are in agreement with previous literature data.