Lipoprotein(a) is robustly associated with aortic valve calcium.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the prevalence and quantity of aortic valve calcium (AVC) in two large cohorts, stratified according to age and lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)), and to assess the association between Lp(a) and AVC. METHODS: We included 2412 participants from the population-based Rotterdam Study (52% women, mean age=69.6±6.3 years) and 859 apparently healthy individuals from the Amsterdam University Medical Centers (UMC) outpatient clinic (57% women, mean age=45.9±11.6 years). All individuals underwent blood sampling to determine Lp(a) concentration and non-enhanced cardiac CT to assess AVC. Logistic and linear regression analyses were performed to investigate the associations of Lp(a) with the presence and amount of AVC. RESULTS: The prevalence of AVC was 33.1% in the Rotterdam Study and 5.4% in the Amsterdam UMC cohort. Higher Lp(a) concentrations were independently associated with presence of AVC in both cohorts (OR per 50 mg/dL increase in Lp(a): 1.54 (95% CI 1.36 to 1.75) in the Rotterdam Study cohort and 2.02 (95% CI 1.19 to 3.44) in the Amsterdam UMC cohort). In the Rotterdam Study cohort, higher Lp(a) concentrations were also associated with increase in aortic valve Agatston score (ß 0.19, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.32 per 50 mg/dL increase). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) is robustly associated with presence of AVC in a wide age range of individuals. These results provide further rationale to assess the effect of Lp(a) lowering interventions in individuals with early AVC to prevent end-stage aortic valve stenosis.

Expert position statements: comparison of recommendations for the care of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Summarize recent recommendations on clinical management of adults and youth with elevated lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] who are at-risk of or affected by cardiovascular disease (CVD). RECENT FINDINGS: There is ample evidence to support elevated Lp(a) levels, present in approximately 20% of the general population, as a causal, independent risk factor for CVD and its role as a significant risk enhancer. Several guidelines and position statements have been published to assist in the identification, treatment and follow-up of adults with elevated levels of Lp(a). There is growing interest in Lp(a) screening and strategies to improve health behaviors starting in youth, although published recommendations for this population are limited. In addition to the well established increased risk of myocardial infarction, stroke and valvular aortic stenosis, data from the coronavirus pandemic suggest adults with elevated Lp(a) may have a particularly high-risk of cardiovascular complications. Lp(a)-specific-lowering therapies are currently in development. Despite their inability to lower Lp(a), use of statins have been shown to improve outcomes in primary and secondary prevention. SUMMARY: Considerable differences exist amongst published guidelines for adults on the use of Lp(a) in clinical practice, and recommendations for youth are limited. With increasing knowledge of Lp(a)'s role in CVD, including recent observations of COVID-19-related risk of cardiovascular complications, more harmonized and comprehensive guidelines for Lp(a) in clinical practice are required. This will facilitate clinical decision-making and help define best practices for identification and management of elevated Lp(a) in adults and youth.

The Prevalence of Elevated Lipoprotein(a) in Patients Presenting With Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Elevated lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an inherited lipid disorder and an independent risk factor for cardiovascular (CV) disease. Although its prevalence in the general population has been well-documented, the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in patients with clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) is less clear. In this study, we hypothesised that there is an over-representation of elevated Lp(a) in patients with early-onset CAD compared to the general population. METHODS: Between 6 February and 8 June 2018, we screened consecutive patients aged ≤70 years who presented to the Austin Hospital with any of the following criteria: (1) acute coronary syndrome (ACS); (2) percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); or (3) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Whilst examining a range of different Lp(a) levels, a dichotomous elevated Lp(a) was defined as concentrations ≥0.5 g/L. Other CV risk factors were documented including hypertension, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) using the Dutch Lipid Clinic Network Criteria (DLCNC), also incorporating family history and clinical examination. RESULTS: One hundred and fifty-eight (158) patients were screened; 63 (39.9%) were under 60 years of age. Overall, elevated Lp(a) ≥0.5 g/L was identified in 57 patients (36.1%). Of these, nine patients (15.8%) also had probable or definite FH. General population data was obtained from the Copenhagen General Population Study which studied 6,000 men and women and showed that the estimated prevalence of Lp(a) ≥0.5 g/L in the general population was 20%. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) is more prevalent in patients with relatively early-onset CAD compared to the general population and may contribute to previously unappreciated residual cardiovascular risk. Patients who present with early-onset CAD, should be routinely screened for elevated Lp(a).

The dedicated "Lp(a) clinic": A concept whose time has arrived?

The emergence of pathophysiological, epidemiologic, and genetic data strongly supports the causality for lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] in cardiovascular disease (CVD) and calcific aortic valve disease (CAVD). In parallel, novel Lp(a) lowering approaches have been developed that have re-invigorated clinical interest in Lp(a). Because Lp(a) is the most prevalent monogenetic lipid disorder globally, with prevalence of Lp(a) > 50 mg/dL estimated at >1.4 billion people, the rationale for diagnosing and managing Lp(a)-mediated risk is now stronger than ever. Patients with elevated Lp(a) are significantly under-diagnosed and the diagnosis is frequently made ad hoc rather than systematically. Elevated Lp(a) levels are associated with atherothrombotic risk and patients present with varied clinical phenotypes, ranging from stroke in pediatric age groups, to ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in young males, to CAVD in elderly individuals. A new clinical care paradigm of a dedicated "Lp(a) Clinic" would serve to evaluate and manage such patients who have elevated Lp(a) as the pathophysiological etiology. Such a clinic would include multidisciplinary expertise in lipid metabolism, clinical cardiology, vascular medicine, valvular disease, thrombosis, and pediatric aspects of clinical care. This viewpoint argues for the rationale of an Lp(a) outpatient clinic where patients with elevated Lp(a) and their affected relatives can be referred, evaluated, managed and followed, to ultimately reduce Lp(a)-mediated CVD and CAVD risk.

Factores de riesgo metabólico y enfermedad cardiovascular asociados a obesidad en una población laboralmente activa / Metabolic Risk Factors and Cardiovascular Disease Associated with Obesity in an Actively Working Population

Introducción: La obesidad se relaciona con múltiples consecuencias adversas para la salud, como hipertensión, diabetes, hiperlipoproteinemia, enfermedad cardiovascular y otras. La prevalencia de estas entidades se ha incrementado en Cuba en las últimas décadas, muy asociadas a la ganancia ponderal. Objetivo: Describir la relación de la obesidad con la enfermedad cardiovascular y los factores de riesgo metabólicos como hipertensión arterial, hiperlipoproteinemia y diabetes mellitus. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio descriptivo, de corte transversal, en 2902 pacientes que acudieron a chequeo médico en el Hospital Militar Central Dr. Carlos J. Finlay. Se recolectaron datos generales, antropométricos y factores de riesgo metabólico de enfermedad cardiovascular. Se realizó glucemia en ayunas, colesterol, triglicéridos, creatinina y prueba de tolerancia a la glucosa oral en casos indicados. Se calculó el filtrado glomerular. Los pacientes fueron clasificados en bajo peso, normo peso, sobrepeso y obeso, se identificó la relación entre el estado nutricional y los factores de riesgo metabólico y la enfermedad cardiovascular. Resultados: Se encontró 44,5 por ciento de sobrepeso, más frecuente entre los hombres (45,5 por ciento) y 29,2 por ciento de obesidad, más frecuente entre las mujeres (31,6 por ciento). El índice de masa corporal aumentó progresivamente con la edad. Los valores de glucemia, colesterol, triglicéridos, HbA1c y filtrado glomerular aumentaron con el estado nutricional, así como la frecuencia de diabetes, hipertensión, hiperlipoproteinemia y enfermedad cardiovascular. Conclusiones: La obesidad fue muy frecuente en este grupo de pacientes, en los cuales se relacionaron directamente los factores de riesgo metabólico hipertensión arterial, hiperlipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus y enfermedad cardiovascular(AU)

Introduction: Obesity is associated with multiple adverse health consequences, such as hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipoproteinemia, cardiovascular disease, and others. The prevalence of these conditions has increased in Cuba in recent decades, closely associated with ponderal gain. Objective: To describe the relationship of obesity with cardiovascular disease and metabolic risk factors such as hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, and diabetes mellitus. Methods: A descriptive, cross-sectional study was carried out with 2902 patients who went for a medical check-up at Dr. Carlos J. Finlay Central Military Hospital. General, anthropometric and metabolic risk factors for cardiovascular disease were gathered. The tests of fasting blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, creatinine and oral glucose tolerance were performed in indicated cases. Glomerular filtrate was calculated. Patients were classified as low weight, normal weight, overweight, and obese. The relationship between nutritional status and metabolic risk factors and cardiovascular disease was identified. Results: 44.5 percent were found in overweight, more frequent among men (45.5 percent). 29.2 percent were found in obesity, more frequent among women (31.6 percent). The body mass index increased progressively with age. Blood glucose, cholesterol, triglycerides, HbA1c, and glomerular filtration levels increased with nutritional status, as well as the frequency of diabetes, hypertension, hyperlipoproteinemia, and cardiovascular disease. Conclusions: Obesity was very frequent in this group of patients, in which the metabolic risk factors were directly associated with high blood pressure, hyperlipoproteinemia, diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease(AU)

Patterns of serum lipids derangements and cardiovascular risk assessment in patients with primary biliary cholangitis.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic cholestatic autoimmune disease that disrupts the cholesterol metabolism. Our aim was to investigate the frequency of dyslipidemias and to evaluate the risk of cardiovascular events in a historic cohort of patients with PBC. PATIENTS: All patients attended from 2000 to 2009 with histological diagnosis of PBC were included and were compared with healthy controls. The 10-year cardiovascular risk was estimated by the Framingham risk score. RESULTS: Fifty four patients with PBC were included and compared to 106 controls. Differences in total cholesterol (263.8±123.9mg/dl vs. 199.6±40, p=0.0001), LDL-cholesterol (179.3±114.8 vs. 126.8±34.7, p=0.0001), HDL-cholesterol (62.4±36.2mg/dl vs. 47.3±12.3, p=0.0001) and triglycerides (149.1±59.1mg/dl vs. 126.4±55.4, p=0.001) were found. Hypercholesterolemia (>240mg/dl) was found in 52.4% of the patients with PBC vs. 11% in the control group, high LDL-cholesterol (160-189mg/dl) in 45.2% of the patients with PBC vs. 10% in controls and hyperalphalipoproteinemia (HDL-cholesterol >60mg/dl) in 45.2% of the patients with PBC vs. 16% in controls. The 10-year cardiovascular risk was 5.3%±5.9 in the patients with PBC and 4.1%±5.7 in the control group (p=0.723, IC 95%=0.637-1.104). Only one cardiovascular event (stroke) in a patient with PBC was registered in a mean follow up time of 57.9±36.5 months. CONCLUSIONS: Marked derangements in serum lipids and a high frequency of dyslipidemias are found in patients with PBC, however, these do not increase the risk of cardiovascular events.

Association of an HDL Apolipoproteomic Score With Coronary Atherosclerosis and Cardiovascular Death.

BACKGROUND: Concentrations of circulating apolipoproteins are strongly linked to risk for coronary artery disease (CAD). The relative importance of the additional knowledge of apolipoprotein concentrations within specific lipoprotein species for CAD risk prediction is limited. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to evaluate the performance of a high-density lipoprotein (HDL) apolipoproteomic score, based on targeted mass spectrometry of HDL-associated apolipoproteins, for the detection of angiographic CAD and outcomes. METHODS: HDL-associated apolipoprotein (apo) A-1, apoC-1, apoC-2, apoC-3, and apoC-4 were measured in 943 participants without prevalent myocardial infarction (MI) referred for coronary angiography in the CASABLANCA (Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases) study. A composite HDL apolipoproteomic score (pCAD) was associated with likelihood of obstructive CAD (≥70% lesion in ≥1 vessel) and with incident cardiovascular outcomes over 4-year follow-up. RESULTS: There were 587 (62.2%) patients with coronary stenosis. The pCAD score was associated with the presence of obstructive CAD (odds ratio: 1.39; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.14 to 1.69; p < 0.001), independently of conventional cardiovascular risk factors including circulating plasma apoA-1 and apoB. The C-index for pCAD was 0.63 (95% CI: 0.59 to 0.67) for the presence of obstructive CAD. Although pCAD was not associated with cardiovascular mortality among all individuals (hazard ratio: 1.24; 95% CI: 0.93 to 1.66; p = 0.15), there was evidence of association for individuals with obstructive CAD (hazard ratio: 1.48; 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.05; p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: An HDL apolipoproteomic score is associated with the presence of CAD, independent of circulating apoA-1 and apoB concentrations and other conventional cardiovascular risk factors. Among individuals with CAD, this score may be independently associated cardiovascular death. (The CASABLANCA Study: Catheter Sampled Blood Archive in Cardiovascular Diseases [CASABLANCA]; NCT00842868).

Hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) in patients with spondyloarthritis: results of the Cardiovascular in Rheumatology (CARMA) project.

OBJECTIVES: Cardiovascular (CV) disease is one of the main causes of morbi-mortality in spondyloarthritis (SpA), partially explained by traditional CV risk factors. Information on lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)], a non-conventional risk factor, in SpA is scarce. In this study we assessed the prevalence of hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) in SpA patients and analysed the possible related factors. METHODS: A baseline analysis was made of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients and controls included in the CARMA project (CARdiovascular in RheuMAtology), a 10-year prospective study evaluating the risk of CV events in chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases. A multivariate logistic regression model was performed using hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) (Lp(a) >50 mg/dl) as a dependent variable and adjusting for confounding factors. RESULTS: 19.2% (95% CI: 16.80-22.05) of the SpA patients [20.7% (95% CI: 16.91-24.82) of those with AS and 17.7% (95% CI: 14.15-21.75) of those with PsA] and 16.7% (95% CI: 13.23-20.86) of the controls had hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) (p=0.326). Adjusting for age and sex, SpA patients were more likely to have hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) than controls (OR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.00-2.04; p=0.05), especially those with AS (OR: 1.81, 95%CI: 1.18-2.77; p=0.007). In the adjusted model, apolipoprotein B in all patients, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in AS, and female sex in PsA, were associated with hyperlipoproteinaemia(a). No disease-specific factors associated with hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) were identified. CONCLUSIONS: SpA patients show a moderately increased risk of hyperlipoproteinaemia(a) compared to controls, especially those with AS. Lp(a) determination may be of interest to improve the CV risk assessment in SpA patients.

Lipoprotein(a) in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a genetically determined risk factor for calcific aortic valve stenosis (CAVS) for which transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is increasingly utilized as treatment. We evaluated the effect of a program to increase testing of and define the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) among patients undergoing TAVR. Educational efforts and incorporation of a "check-box" Lp(a) order to the preoperative TAVR order set were instituted. Retrospective chart review was performed in 229 patients requiring TAVR between May 2013 and September 2018. Of these patients, 57% had an Lp(a) level measured; testing rates increased from 0% in 2013 to 96% in 2018. Lipoprotein(a) testing occurred in 11% of patients before and in 80% of patients after the "check-box" order set ( P < .001). The prevalence of elevated Lp(a) (≥30 mg/dL) was 35%; these patients had a higher incidence of coronary artery disease requiring revascularization compared with patients with normal Lp(a) (65% vs 47%; P = .047). Patients with Lp(a) ≥30 mg/dL also had higher incidence of paravalvular leak compared with those with normal Lp(a) (13% vs 4%; P = .04). This study defines the prevalence of elevated Lp(a) in advanced stages of CAVS and provides a practice pathway to assess procedural complications and long-term outcomes of TAVR in patients with elevated Lp(a) levels.

Lack of Correlation of Carotid Intima-Media Index and Peripheral Artery Disease.

INTRODUCTION: Increased carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) measurement is usually seen as a surrogate marker of peripheral artery disease (PAD) but there is scarce cumulated evidence to support this view. AIM: To evaluate prevalence of increased IMT among patients with symptomatic PAD as well as the frequency of some cardiovascular risk factors in these patients. METHODS: They were recruited 230 patients with diagnosis of medium peripheral artery disease in the Vascular Surgery Service outpatient's office. Serum cystatin C, homocysteine, and lipoprotein (a) were measured. GFR was estimated using the CKD-EPI equation and the Larsson one from cystatin C. RESULTS: The global prevalence of increased IMT was 16.5% (n = 38, 95% CI 12.3-21.9). In all the frequency of hyperlipoproteinemia (a) was 34.2% (95% CI 28.4-40.5%). The global prevalence of hyperhomocysteinemia was 61.5% (95% CI 54.6-68.1%) and the proportion of patients with high cystatin C levels was 38.5% (95% CI 32.1-42.5). The prevalence of stage III chronic kidney disease or higher by CKD-EPI formula was much lesser (13.6%, 95% CI 9.7-18.7) as was the frequency obtained by the Larsson equation (28.7%, 95% CI 23.2-34.9). No differences were found between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Increased IMT is not common among PAD patients. Hyperlipoproteinemia (a) and hyperhomocysteinemia are very frequent in these patients. High serum cystatin levels are also very prevalent but reduced GFR is not so frequent. There were no differences in the prevalence of the studied cardiovascular risk factors between those patients with increased IMT and those ones with normal IMT.

Apheresis to Mitigate Atherosclerotic Vascular Disease.

BACKGROUND: Therapeutic apheresis is a term used to describe a group of treatments where blood components are separated in real time, and one component is removed, exchanged, and/or treated to remove pathogenic substances from the circulation. Plasma exchange, which removed all plasma components, and lipid apheresis which selectively removes lipoproteins from circulation, have both been used to treat atherosclerotic vascular diseases. METHODS: To review the literature regarding the application of therapeutic apheresis for atherosclerotic vascular diseases. RESULTS: Primarily lipid apheresis is used to treat atherosclerotic vascular diseases, particularly familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia and peripheral vascular diseases. Lipid apheresis can be used as first line or second line treatment with a strong evidenced-based recommendation. Its use has decreased atherosclerotic events. CONCLUSION: Lipid apheresis is an important therapy for the treatment of familial hypercholesterolemia, lipoprotein (a) hyperlipoproteinemia and peripheral vascular diseases. Lipid apheresis does more than remove low-density lipoproteins and other lipoproteins but also decreases inflammatory markers and improves blood flow.

Novel polymorphisms associated with hyperalphalipoproteinemia and apparent cardioprotection.

BACKGROUND: Hyperalphalipoproteinemia (HALP) is inversely correlated with coronary heart disease (CHD) although genetic variants associated with high serum levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) have not been shown to be cardioprotective. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to uncover novel genetic variants associated with HALP and possibly with reduced risk of CHD. METHODS: Exome sequencing data, HDL-C, and triglyceride levels were analyzed in 1645 subjects. They included the University of Maryland outpatients with high HDL-C (n = 12), Cardiovascular Health Study (n = 210), Jackson Heart Study (n = 402), Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (n = 404), Framingham Heart Study (n = 463), and Old Order Amish (n = 154). RESULTS: Novel nonsynonymous single-nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) were identified in men and women with primary HALP (mean HDL-C, 145 ± 30 mg/dL). Using PolyPhen-2 and Combined Annotation Dependent Depletion to estimate the predictive effect of each nsSNP on the gene product, rare, deleterious polymorphisms in UGT1A3, PLLP, PLEKHH1, ANK2, DIS3L, ACACB, and LRP4 were identified in 16 subjects with HALP but not in any tested subject with low HDL-C (<40 mg/dL). In addition, a single novel polymorphism, rs376849274, was found in OSBPL1A. The majority of these candidate genes have been implicated in fat and lipid metabolism, and none of these subjects has a history of CHD despite 75% of subjects having risk factors for CHD. Overall, the probability of finding these nsSNPs in a non-high HDL-C population ranges from 1 × 10-17 to 1 × 10-25. CONCLUSION: Novel functional polymorphisms in 8 candidate genes are associated with HALP in the absence of CHD. Future study is required to examine the extent to which these genes may affect HDL function and serve as potential therapeutic targets for CHD risk reduction.

High levels of lipoprotein (a) and premature acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are associated with increased risk of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). We explored whether Lp(a) exhibits a stronger association with premature ACS. METHODS: A case-control study was conducted; 1457 patients with a history of ACS (54.8 ± 13 years, 86% males) and 2090 age-sex matched adults free of cardiovascular disease were enrolled. Bio-clinical characteristics [risk factors, low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, Lp(a)] were derived through standard procedures. RESULTS: A 10 mg/dL increase in Lp(a) was associated with 4% (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02) higher likelihood of having ACS in younger (<45 years) and 2% (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.02) higher likelihood in middle-aged (45-60 years) individuals. Adjusting for common risk factors, elevated Lp(a), i.e. >50 mg/dL, was still associated with increased likelihood of ACS in younger adults (<45 years) (OR = 2.88, 95% CI, 1.7 to 4.6) and in middle aged ones (45 and 60 years) (OR = 2.06, 95% CI, 1.4 to 3.2), but not in older participants (>60 years) (OR = 1.31, 95% CI, 0.8 to 2.4). CONCLUSIONS: Lp(a) seems to be an independent risk factor for ACS in individuals <45 years, and high Lp(a) levels increase by ∼3folds the risk for ACS. The association is preserved but is less in middle-aged individuals (45-60 years) and is abolished >60 years.

Persistent High Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Early Childhood: A Latent Class Growth Model Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To examine patterns of non-high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol in early childhood and identify factors associated with persistent high non-HDL cholesterol in healthy urban children. STUDY DESIGN: We identified all children enrolled in a primary care practice-based research network called TARGet Kids! (The Applied Research Group for Kids) with ≥3 laboratory measurements of non-HDL cholesterol. Latent class growth model analysis was performed to identify distinct trajectory groups for non-HDL cholesterol. Trajectory groups were then categorized into "normal" vs "persistent-high" non-HDL cholesterol based on guideline cut-off values and logistic regression was completed to examine the association between trajectory group and the presence of anthropometric and cardiometabolic risk factors. RESULTS: A total of 608 children met inclusion criteria for the trajectory analysis (median age at enrolment = 18.3, IQR = 27.9 months). Four trajectory groups were identified with 2 groups (n = 451) categorized as normal non-HDL cholesterol and 2 groups (n = 157) as persistent high non-HDL cholesterol. Family history of high cholesterol (OR 2.04, 95% CI 1.27-3.28) was associated significantly with persistent high non-HDL cholesterol, whereas East/Southeast Asian vs European ethnicity (OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.78), longer breastfeeding duration (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-1.00), and greater birth weight (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.48-1.00) were associated with lower odds of persistent high non-HDL cholesterol. CONCLUSIONS: Patterns of non-HDL cholesterol are identified during early childhood, and family history of high cholesterol was associated most strongly with persistent high non-HDL cholesterol. Future research should inform the development of a clinical prediction tool for lipids in early childhood to identify children who may benefit from interventions to promote cardiovascular health.

The German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) - almost 5 years on.

BACKGROUND: Since 2005 an interdisciplinary German apheresis working group has been established by members of both German Societies of Nephrology and of Lipidologists and completed the data set for the registry according to the current guidelines and the German indication guideline for apheresis in 2009. In 2011 the German Lipoprotein Apheresis Registry (GLAR) was launched and data are available over nearly 5 years now. METHODS AND RESULTS: During the time period 2012-2016, 71 German apheresis centers collected retrospective and prospective observational data of 1435 patients undergoing lipoprotein apheresis (LA) treatment of high LDL-C levels and/or high Lp (a) levels suffering from cardiovascular disease (CVD) or progressive CVD. A total of 15,527 completely documented LA treatments were entered into the database. All patients treated by LA showed a median LDL-C reduction rate of 67.5%, and a median Lp (a) reduction rate of 71.1%. Analog to the Pro(a)LiFe pattern, patient data were analyzed to the incidence rate of coronary events (MACE) 1 and 2 years before the beginning of LA treatment (y-2 and y­1) and prospectively two years on LA treatment (y + 1 and y + 2). During two years of LA treatment a MACE reduction of 78% was observed. In the years considered, side effects of LA treatment were low (5.9%) and mainly comprised puncture problems. CONCLUSIONS: The data generated by the GLAR shows that LA lowers the incidence rate of cardiovascular events in patients with high LDL-C and/or high Lp (a) levels, progressive CVD, and maximally tolerated lipid lowering medication. In addition, LA treatments were found to be safe with a low rate of side effects.

Incidence of elevated lipoprotein (a) levels in a large cohort of patients with cardiovascular disease.

BACKGROUND: Recently it has been demonstrated that elevated lipoprotein (a) (LPA) levels are associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease across multiple ethnic groups. However, there is only scanty data about the incidence of elevated LPA levels in different patient cohorts. As a consequence, we aimed to examine whether patients with elevated LPA levels might be seen more often in a cardiovascular center in comparison to the general population. METHODS: We reviewed LPA concentrations of 52,898 consecutive patients who were admitted to our hospital between January 2004 and December 2014. We subdivided them into different groups according to their LPA levels. Data was compared to available information in medical literature. RESULTS: 26.4% of the patients had LPA levels >30 mg/dl which is in line with the data from literature. Mean level of LPA concentration in our study was twice as high in comparison to the general population (25.8% vs. 13.3%). 4.6% had LPA levels >98 mg/dl (general population <0.3%). CONCLUSION: In patients admitted to a cardiovascular center the proportion of LPA >30 mg/dl is comparable to the general population but mean levels over all are twice as high and the proportion of patients with LPA levels of >98 mg/dl is extremely higher.

Prevention of cardiovascular complications in patients with Lp(a)-hyperlipoproteinemia and progressive cardiovascular disease by long-term lipoprotein apheresis according to German national guidelines.

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is an independent cardiovascular risk factor playing a causal role for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (CVD). Lipoprotein apheresis (LA) is a safe well-tolerated outpatient treatment to lower LDL-C and Lp(a) by 60-70%, and is the ultimate escalating therapeutic option in patients with hyperlipoproteinemias (HLP) involving LDL particles. Major therapeutic effect of LA is preventing cardiovascular events. Lp(a)-HLP associated with progressive CVD has been approved as indication for regular LA in Germany since 2008. The Pro(a)LiFe-study investigated with a prospective multicenter design the long-term preventive effect of LA on incidence rates of cardiovascular events prospectively over a period of 5 years in 170 consecutive patients who commenced regular LA. During a median period of 4.7 years of the pre-LA period, Lp(a) associated progressive CVD became apparent. Apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) isoforms and polymorphisms at the apo(a) gene (LPA) were analyzed to assess hypothetical clinical correlations. 154 patients (90.6%) completed 5­years follow-up. Significant decline of the mean annual major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rate was observed from 0.41 ± 0.45 two years prior to regular LA to 0.06 ± 0.11 during 5 years with regular LA (p < 0.0001). 95.3% of patients expressed at least one small apo(a) isoform. Calculation of isoform specific concentrations allowed to confirm the equivalence of 60 mg/dl or 120 nmol/l as Lp(a) thresholds of the German LA guideline. Results of 5 years prospective follow-up confirmed that LA has a lasting effect on prevention of cardiovascular events in patients with Lp(a)-HLP and afore progressive CVD.