Delayed Severe Gingivitis After Placement of Orthodontic Braces in an Atopic Teenager: A Case Report and Literature Review.

We report a case of a 15-year-old atopic patient presenting with delayed, severe ulcerative hypertrophic gingivitis after placement of orthodontic braces, which required removal of braces and restorative laser surgical procedures. Patch testing to multiple metals and chemicals showed weak positive reactions to steel bands and formaldehyde. The patient experienced urticarial, gingivitis, and other intraoral symptoms after patch testing and re-exposure to nickel-containing products. In contrast, nickel, cobalt, and cobalt-chromium (Co-Cr) bracket patch testing sites were negative. Nickel-caused contact dermatitis is Type IV delayed hypersensitivity reaction occurring at least 24 h after exposure. This reaction can result in intraoral blisters, ulcerations, eczematous and urticarial reactions of the face and more distant skin areas. This case illustrates the intraoral delayed response, symptom resolution after removing the braces, and brackets and local reactions upon subsequent nickel exposure, despite negative patch testing and lymphocyte stimulation test to nickel. This case further illustrates the difficulty associated with diagnosing nickel allergy.

A Histologic Timeline of a Delayed Hypersensitivity Reaction after the COVID-19 Pfizer Booster.

A 54-year-old man presented with worsening bilateral rashes on legs and arms 7 days after receiving his BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 (Pfizer) vaccine booster. He developed burning on his palms about 5 days after receiving the booster. On day 6, he observed significant edema on his fingers and palms in addition to thin erythematous papules on his forearms. On day 7, he developed edema on his bilateral dorsal feet, and thin erythematous plaques on his shins. He stated that the rashes were pruritic. He had no rashes following the first two doses of the Pfizer vaccine. He denied having any history of skin disease, autoimmune disease, or allergies. Physical examination revealed multiple thin erythematous papules coalescing into thin plaques on his flexor forearms, and thin erythematous plaques on his dorsal feet (Figure 1). Three 4-mm punch biopsies were performed on his left flexor forearm. The biopsies were carried out at papules present for different lengths of time. Papules at biopsy sites "A," "B," and "C" were present for approximately 24-36 hours, 12-18 hours, and 3-6 hours, respectively (Figure 1).

Skin Testing Approaches for Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions.

In evaluating adverse drug reactions (ADRs), patch tests (PTs), skin prick tests (SPTs), and intradermal tests (IDTs) are useful tools for identifying responsible drugs and finding safe alternatives. Their diagnostic value depends on the clinical features of the ADR and on the drug tested. PTs have a good sensitivity in assessing acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms. SPTs done with all drugs except opiates are used for immediate hypersensitivity reactions. IDTs seem sensitive for immediate hypersensitivity reactions to beta-lactam antibiotics, iodinated contrast media, heparins, general anesthetics, and platinum salts.

Clinical and histopathological spectrum of delayed adverse cutaneous reactions following COVID-19 vaccination.

BACKGROUND: As more people become vaccinated against the SARS-CoV-2 virus, reports of delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions are beginning to emerge. METHODS: In this IRB-approved retrospective case series, biopsy specimens of potential cutaneous adverse reactions from the Pfizer-BioNTech or Moderna mRNA vaccine were identified and reviewed. Clinical information was obtained through the requisition form, referring clinician, or medical chart review. RESULTS: Twelve cases were included. Histopathological features from two injection-site reactions showed a mixed-cell infiltrate with eosinophils and a spongiotic dermatitis with eosinophils. Three biopsy specimens came from generalized eruptions that showed interface changes consistent with an exanthematous drug reaction. Three biopsy specimens revealed a predominantly spongiotic pattern, consistent with eczematous dermatitis. Small-vessel vascular injury was seen in two specimens, which were diagnosed as urticarial vasculitis and leukocytoclastic vasculitis, respectively. There were two cases of new-onset bullous pemphigoid supported by histopathological examination and direct immunofluorescence studies. Eosinophils were seen in 10 cases. CONCLUSIONS: Dermatopathologists should be aware of potential cutaneous adverse reactions to mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccines. Histopathological patterns include mixed-cell infiltrates, epidermal spongiosis, and interface changes. Eosinophils are a common finding but are not always present. Direct immunofluorescence studies may be helpful for immune-mediated cutaneous presentations such as vasculitis or bullous pemphigoid.

Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions to Antibiotics: Aminoglycosides, Clindamycin, Linezolid, and Metronidazole.

Hypersensitivity reactions including IgE-mediated and delayed cell-mediated reactions to aminoglycosides, clindamycin, linezolid, and metronidazole are rare. For aminoglycosides, allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent reaction for which patch testing can be a useful step in evaluation. For clindamycin, delayed maculopapular exanthems are the most common reactions. There are case reports of clindamycin associated with drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP), acute febrile neutrophilic dermatosis, and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema (SDRIFE). For linezolid, cases of hypersensitivity were exceedingly rare and included urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis, delayed rashes, and DRESS. For metronidazole, only rare cases were found across a broad spectrum of reactions including allergic contact dermatitis, fixed drug eruption, angioedema, anaphylaxis, serum sickness-like reaction, SJS/TEN, AGEP, SDRIFE, and a possible case of DRESS. IgE-mediated reactions and anaphylaxis to these types of antibiotics are uncommon, and reports of skin testing concentrations and desensitization protocols are largely limited to case reports and series. Non-irritating skin testing concentrations have been reported for gentamycin, tobramycin, and clindamycin. Published desensitization protocols for intravenous and inhaled tobramycin, oral clindamycin, intravenous linezolid, and oral and intravenous metronidazole have also been reported and are reviewed.

Trunnionosis and metal wear causing metal hypersensitivity: 2 sides of the same coin?

Metal hypersensitivity (MHS) and trunnionosis are being looked at more frequently. Both entities pose a difficult concern for surgeons and patients alike. This commentary highlights the similarities and differences between the 2 conditions. When a surgeon suspects either MHS or trunnionosis, both should be considered in the differential diagnosis. Both conditions are rare and should be considered a diagnosis of exclusion. The commentary proposes an outline on how to diagnose and treat the 2 entities.

Skin Resident Memory T Cells May Play Critical Role in Delayed-Type Drug Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Delayed-type drug hypersensitivity reactions (dtDHR) are immune-mediated reactions with skin and visceral manifestations ranging from mild to severe. Clinical care is negatively impacted by a limited understanding of disease pathogenesis. Though T cells are believed to orchestrate disease, the type of T cell and the location and mechanism of T cell activation remain unknown. Resident memory T cells (TRM) are a unique T cell population potentially well situated to act as key mediators in disease pathogenesis, but significant obstacles to defining, identifying, and testing TRM in dtDHR preclude definitive conclusions at this time. Deeper mechanistic interrogation to address these unanswered questions is necessary, as involvement of TRM in disease has significant implications for prediction, diagnosis, and treatment of disease.

Lactoferrin as an Adjuvant for the Generation of Delayed Type Hypersensitivity to Orally Administered Antigen.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this investigation was to evaluate the property of bovine lactoferrin (LF) in the generation of delayed type hypersensitivity (DTH) as an oral adjuvant during immunization with ovalbumin (OVA) and BCG. METHODS: LF admixed with OVA or BCG was used for immunization of CBA or C57BL/6 mice when given via oral or subcutaneous routes. Elicited DTH response was measured post immunization. Inhibition studies using mannose or galactose were accomplished by gavage prior to oral administration of antigens. LF was also examined for effects on BCG uptake by bone marrow derived macrophages (BMM). RESULTS: LF at doses of 1.0 mg and 10.0 mg, admixed with OVA (10.0 mg), significantly enhanced the antigen-specific DTH reaction. The stimulatory effects of LF were inhibited by the oral pretreatment of mice with 50.0 mg of mannose but not galactose. LF also enhanced the DTH reaction to orally administered BCG. LF enhanced uptake of BCG by BMM in a dose-dependent manner. CONCLUSION: LF was able to augment development of DTH when orally administered with OVA or BCG antigens. Inhibition studies suggest the involvement of the receptor with an affinity to mannose in mediation of the adjuvant effect. LF augmentation of the DTH response was partially effective when given in advance of oral delivery of the antigen; this effect could also be saturated by mannose. BCG studies provide preliminary evidence for LF in the potential augmentation of oral vaccination to prevent mycobacterial infection. In vitro experiments provide evidence that LF plays a role in modulation of antigen presenting cell activation.

Massive bee envenomation treated by therapeutic plasma exchange.

In the unfortunate event of massive envenomation and precipitation of multiorgan failure, therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) can be considered as a modality for therapy. We present a patient case where TPE potentially allowed for removal of toxin with subsequent clinical improvement.

Intradermal Testing Identifies 1 in 4 Patients with Nonimmediate Penicillin Allergy.

BACKGROUND: Intradermal testing with delayed reading (IDTdr), used routinely in many centers, may identify delayed reactions to penicillins. However, few studies have compared the results of IDTdr with drug provocation test (DPT). The aim of this study was to examine the proportion of provocation-positive patients testing positive on IDTdr. METHODS: Fifty-seven patients with a positive DPT occurring >2 h after intake of penicillin V, dicloxacillin, pivampicillin, or amoxicillin had an IDTdr with penicillin G, amoxicillin, ampicillin, and dicloxacillin. A control group included 18 patients with negative DPTs with the suspected penicillin. RESULTS: In total 25% (n = 14) of provocation-positive patients tested positive on IDTdr. Among patients with positive IDTdr, 9/14 (64%) versus 11/43 (26%) in the IDTdr negative group (p < 0.05) had required oral steroids to treat skin reactions following DPT. No other differences between IDTdr positive and negative groups were found. No controls had a positive IDTdr. CONCLUSION: Investigating with IDTdr would have identified 25% of patients with a DPT-verified allergy with delayed reactions. It is difficult to target subgroups who will test positive on IDTdr. There were more patients who tested positive on IDT who had received oral steroids after DPT, and this may be an indication that skin reaction severity plays a role in skin testing diagnostics. Further potential predictors for positivity of IDTdr, such as duration of skin symptoms, should be assessed in large studies in order to optimize the investigations of nonimmediate drug allergic reactions.