Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 29.949
Filter
1.
PeerJ ; 12: e17342, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38737745

ABSTRACT

Background: N-Ethylmaleimide (NEM), an agonist of the potassium chloride cotransporters 2 (KCC2) receptor, has been correlated with neurosuppressive outcomes, including decreased pain perception and the prevention of epileptic seizures. Nevertheless, its relationship with sleep-inducing effects remains unreported. Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the potential enhancement of NEM on the sleep-inducing properties of alprazolam (Alp). Methods: The test of the righting reflex was used to identify the appropriate concentrations of Alp and NEM for inducing sleep-promoting effects in mice. Total sleep duration and sleep quality were evaluated through EEG/EMG analysis. The neural mechanism underlying the sleep-promoting effect was examined through c-fos immunoreactivity in the brain using immunofluorescence. Furthermore, potential CNS-side effects of the combination Alp and NEM were assessed using LABORAS automated home-cage behavioral phenotyping. Results: Combination administration of Alp (1.84 mg/kg) and NEM (1.0 mg/kg) significantly decreased sleep latency and increased sleep duration in comparison to administering 1.84 mg/kg Alp alone. This effect was characterized by a notable increase in REM duration. The findings from c-fos immunoreactivity indicated that NEM significantly suppressed neuron activation in brain regions associated with wakefulness. Additionally, combination administration of Alp and NEM showed no effects on mouse neural behaviors during automated home cage monitoring. Conclusions: This study is the first to propose and demonstrate a combination therapy involving Alp and NEM that not only enhances the hypnotic effect but also mitigates potential CNS side effects, suggesting its potential application in treating insomnia.


Subject(s)
Alprazolam , Drug Synergism , Sleep , Animals , Alprazolam/pharmacology , Alprazolam/administration & dosage , Mice , Male , Sleep/drug effects , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-fos/metabolism , Brain/drug effects , Brain/metabolism , Reflex, Righting/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage
2.
BMC Pulm Med ; 24(1): 243, 2024 May 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760702

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Remimazolam is safe and effective for moderate sedation during flexible bronchoscopy, but its safety and efficacy during endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) remains undetermined. The REST trial (NCT06275594) will be a prospective randomized study of remimazolam in patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA with conscious sedation. The primary aim is to evaluate whether remimazolam is safe and effective for moderate sedation during EBUS-TBNA compared to real-world midazolam and on-label midazolam. METHODS: The REST trial will recruit 330 patients from four university hospitals with mediastinal lesions suspected of being lung cancer who are eligible for EBUS-TBNA under moderate sedation. The participants will be randomized into groups using remimazolam, real-world midazolam, and on-label midazolam (US prescribing information dosage) to perform EBUS-TBNA for procedural sedation. The primary endpoint will be procedural success using composite measures. DISCUSSION: The REST trial will prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of remimazolam during EBUS-TBNA under moderate sedation. It will provide information for optimizing sedation modalities and contribute to practical benefits in patients undergoing EBUS-TBNA. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06275594). Prospectively registered on 15 February 2024.


Subject(s)
Conscious Sedation , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Lung Neoplasms , Midazolam , Humans , Prospective Studies , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/adverse effects , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/methods , Conscious Sedation/methods , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/drug therapy , Midazolam/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines , Bronchoscopy/methods , Bronchoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Adult , Middle Aged
3.
J Tradit Chin Med ; 44(3): 595-608, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38767645

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To present a bibliometric analysis of global scientific publications on the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia with regard to influential institutions, publications, countries, research hotspots, trends, and frontiers. METHODS: A literature review was conducted by searching the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases to identify all publications related to the nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment of insomnia from 2000 to 2021. Eligible publications were reviewed, including annual publication increments, citation analyses, international collaborations, and keyword analyses. The data were analysed using CiteSpace (vers5.8.R3, 6.1.R2 and 6.1.6, College of Computing and Informatics, Philadelphia, PA, USA) and virtualized by knowledge maps. RESULTS:In total, 9832 publications were included in this analysis. The results from the WoSCC showed that the United States of America (Count = 2268, 40.33%), Stanford University (Count = 141, 2.51%), and the United States Department of Health and Human Services were the leading country, institute, and funding agency regarding the number of publications, respectively. 'Cognitive-behavioural therapy" was the most popular research topic generated from the cocited reference. The most frequently co-occurring keywords were insomnia, cognitive behavioural therapy, disorder, depression, quality of life, Meta-analysis, older adult, sleep, prevalence and efficacy, while keywords including clinical practice guideline, guideline, and Tai Chi remained popular after 2021. Circadian rhythm was the strongest research frontier for 2000-2021. In China, Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese Medicine (Count = 69, 4.79%) was the most productive institute in this field. The most frequently co-occurring keywords from Chinese literature were sleep disorder, sleep quality, acupuncture and moxibustion, Parkinson's disease, transcranial magnetic stimulation, health education, music therapy, chronic insomnia, quality of life, and nonmotor symptoms. Traditional Chinese medicine was the strongest research frontier for 2019-2021. CONCLUSION: This bibliometric study provides an exhaustive mapping encompassing pertinent institute, publications, influential articles, researchers and topics of the global trend of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia. The results show that the research trend has shifted from primary studies on the efficacy and safety of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to comorbidity studies. Clinical practice guidelines will potentially become the research frontier for this field post-2021. The findings are important for researchers, clinicians, journal editors, and policy-makers working in the field of nondrug and nonsedative hypnotic treatment for insomnia to understand the strengths and potentials in the current studies and guide future clinical practice, research, and science policy.


Subject(s)
Bibliometrics , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use
4.
Drug Des Devel Ther ; 18: 1613-1625, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38774484

ABSTRACT

Purpose: Remimazolam, an ultra-short-acting and fast-metabolized sedative, has only been sporadically investigated in children. This study was performed to determine the beneficial effects of intranasal remimazolam or dexmedetomidine on preoperative anxiety in children undergoing general surgeries. Patients and Methods: Ninety children were randomly and equally assigned to Group R (intranasal remimazolam 1.5mg kg-1), Group D (intranasal dexmedetomidine 2 mcg kg-1), and Group C (intranasal distilled water). The primary outcomes were the preoperative anxiety scores using the modified Yale preoperative anxiety scale (m-Ypas). The secondary outcomes included the cooperation behaviour of intranasal drug application, preoperative sedation levels, parental separation anxiety scores (PSAS), and mask acceptance scores (MAS). Results: Group R showed a significant low anxiety at 10 min after intranasal premedication (vs group C, P=0.010; vs group D, P = 0.002) and at anaesthesia induction (vs group C, P = 0.004). Group D showed a significantly low anxiety score only prior to anaesthesia induction (vs group C, P = 0.005). Most children in group R achieved mild sedation at 10 min (vs group C, P < 0.001; vs group D, P < 0.001), with a few progressing to deep sedation afterwards, while group D tended toward deep sedation. Compared to Group C, patients in Group R performed significantly better on the MAS (P = 0.014) and PSAS (P = 0.008). However, remimazolam did cause poor cooperation behavior to the intranasal application due to its mucosal irritation (vs group C, P = 0.001; vs group D, P = 0.010). Conclusion: Both intranasal remimazolam and dexmedetomidine can effectively alleviate preoperative anxiety in children. While intranasal remimazolam has a rapid onset, it produces only mild sedation and causes substantial nasal irritation. Trial Registration: NCT04720963, January 22, 2021, ClinicalTrials.Gov.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Anti-Anxiety Agents , Anxiety , Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Male , Female , Anti-Anxiety Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Anxiety Agents/pharmacology , Child , Child, Preschool , Anxiety/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage , Benzodiazepines/pharmacology , Double-Blind Method
5.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 174, 2024 May 14.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745175

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Compared to midazolam, remimazolam has a faster onset and offset of hypnotic effect, as well as cardiorespiratory stability, this study aims to determine the 90% effective dose (ED90) of remimazolam to inhibit responses to insertion of a duodenoscope during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). METHODS: A dose-response study was carried out undergoing ERCP who received remimazolam-alfentanil anesthesia using 10 µg/kg of alfentanil between September 2021 and November 2021. The initial dose of remimazolam was 0.2 mg/kg. The dose was then decided based on the responses of earlier patients by exploiting the sequential ascend and descend according to a 9: 1 biased coin design. Upon failure, the dose of remimazolam was increased by 0.025 mg/kg in the next patient. When the insertion was successful, the succeeding patient was randomized to an identical dose or a dose that was lower by 0.025 mg/kg.The ED90 of remimazolam for inhibiting responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope during ERCP was calculated. Adverse events and complications of remimazolam were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 55 elderly patients (age > 65) were included in the study. 45 successfully anesthetized patients, and 10 unsuccessfully. The ED90 of remimazolam was 0.300 mg/kg (95% CI = 0.287-0.320). ED95 was 0.315 (95% CI = 0.312-0.323) and ED99 was 0.323 (95% CI = 0.323-0.325). Among the patients, 9 patients developed hypotension, 2 patients developed bradycardia and 1 patient developed tachycardia, and hypoxia occurred in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS: A loading dose of 0.300 mg / kg of remimazolam for elderly patients undergoing ERCP can safely, effectively, and quickly induce patients to fall asleep and inhibit responses to the insertion of a duodenoscope. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study protocol was registered at the website ClinicalTrials.gov on 22/09/2021(NCT05053763).


Subject(s)
Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Duodenoscopes , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Humans , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Male , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Aged , Alfentanil/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Benzodiazepines/administration & dosage
6.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 103(18): e38040, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38701317

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Infants undergoing magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) often require pharmacological sedation. Dexmedetomidine serves as a novel sedative agent that induces a unique unconsciousness similar to natural sleep, and therefore has currently been used as the first choice for sedation in infants and young children. OBJECTIVE: To determine the 50% effective dose (ED50) and 95% confidence interval (95%CI) of intranasal dexmedetomidine for MRI in preterm and term infants, and to observe the incidence of adverse events. To explore whether there were differences in ED50 and 95%CI, heart rate (HR) and blood oxygen saturation (SpO2), the induction time and wake-up time and the incidence of adverse events between the 2 groups, so as to provide guidance for clinical safe medication for the meanwhile. METHODS: A total of 68 infants were prospectively recruited for MRI examination under drug sedation (1 week ≤ age ≤ 23 weeks or weight ≤ 5kg). The children were divided into 2 groups according to whether they had preterm birth experience (Preterm group, Atterm group). The Dixon up-and-down method was used to explore ED50. The basic vital signs of the 2 groups were recorded, and the heart rate and SpO2 were recorded every 5 minutes until the infants were discharged from the hospital. The induction time, wake-up time and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: The ED50 (95%CI) of intranasal dexmedetomidine in the Preterm group and the Atterm group were 2.23 (2.03-2.66) µg/kg and 2.64 (2.49-2.83) µg/kg, respectively (P < .05). the wake-up time was longer in Preterm group (98.00min) than in Atterm group (81.00 min) (P < .05), the incidence of bradycardia in Preterm group was 3/33, which was higher than that in Atterm group (1/35). There was no difference in the induction time between the 2 groups (P > .05), and there was no significant difference in other adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Intranasal dexmedetomidine can be safely used for sedation in preterm infants undergoing MRI. Compared with term infants, preterm infants have a lower dose of dexmedetomidine, a higher incidence of bradycardia, and a longer weak-up time.


Subject(s)
Administration, Intranasal , Dexmedetomidine , Heart Rate , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Infant, Premature , Magnetic Resonance Imaging , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Humans , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Infant, Newborn , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Heart Rate/drug effects , Oxygen Saturation/drug effects , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug
8.
Prim Care ; 51(2): 299-310, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692776

ABSTRACT

Sleep significantly impacts health. Insomnia, characterized by difficulty with sleep onset, maintenance, and subsequent daytime symptoms, is increasingly prevalent and increases the risk of other medical comorbidities. The pathophysiology involves hyperarousal during non-REM sleep and altered sleep homeostasis. The 3P model explains the development and persistence of insomnia. Assessment is primarily clinical and based on appropriate history while distinguishing from other sleep disorders. "Somnomics" suggests a personalized approach to management. Cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia is the first-line treatment in addition to other nonpharmacological strategies. Medications are a secondary option with weak supporting evidence.


Subject(s)
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/therapy , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/diagnosis , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/physiopathology , Primary Health Care/organization & administration , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use
9.
Croat Med J ; 65(2): 146-155, 2024 Apr 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38706240

ABSTRACT

AIM: To review the literature data on the prevalence of benzodiazepines abuse and poisoning in older adults; the prevalence of polypharmacy with benzodiazepines in this demographic; and determine whether benzodiazepine anxiolytics or hypnotics were more frequently implicated in the cases of abuse and poisoning. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Scopus for relevant studies published from January 1, 2013, to May 1, 2023. Twelve studies were included in the final selection. RESULTS: The review highlights the diverse prevalence rates of benzodiazepine abuse and poisoning in the older adult population. Benzodiazepine anxiolytics were more frequently associated with negative outcomes than benzodiazepine hypnotics. Concurrent use of benzodiazepines, benzodiazepine-related medications, and opioids was reported, although these medications were not the only ones commonly used by the elderly. CONCLUSION: It is essential to increase awareness about adhering to prescribed pharmacological therapies to mitigate issues related to drug abuse and poisoning among older adults.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Aged , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Substance-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Polypharmacy , Prevalence , Aged, 80 and over , Anti-Anxiety Agents/adverse effects , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use
10.
J Feline Med Surg ; 26(5): 1098612X241248980, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717831

ABSTRACT

CASE SERIES SUMMARY: This case series describes the use of orally administered dexmedetomidine at a dose of 20 µg/kg to induce emesis in six cats. Emesis was successfully induced in 5/6 cats, with each of the cats vomiting once. The reasons for inducing vomiting included known or suspected ingestion of lilies, onions, acetaminophen (paracetamol) or acetylsalicylic acid. Four of the five cats in which emesis induction was successful did not develop any clinical signs of toxicity associated with the toxin ingested; the fifth cat developed clinicopathological changes consistent with acetaminophen toxicity. All six cats exhibited moderate to profound sedation, as expected, but no other adverse effects were documented. RELEVANCE AND NOVEL INFORMATION: Induction of emesis in cats is notoriously difficult. This case series describes a novel route of administration of dexmedetomidine, a commonly available medication, with a high success rate observed for inducing emesis in this group of cats.


Cats are notoriously more difficult to elicit vomiting in than dogs. This case series describes the use of a novel way of giving cats a commonly available veterinary medication to cause vomiting. The medication, dexmedetomidine, was given by mouth to six cats, of which five vomited. All six cats had eaten toxins: lilies, acetaminophen (paracetamol), aspirin or onions. Four of the five cats that vomited did not develop any signs of toxicity. All six cats that received the medication became sedated, but no other side effects were noted.


Subject(s)
Cat Diseases , Dexmedetomidine , Vomiting , Animals , Cats , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Vomiting/veterinary , Vomiting/chemically induced , Cat Diseases/chemically induced , Male , Female , Administration, Oral , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects
11.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 167, 2024 May 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38702608

ABSTRACT

The exact mechanisms and the neural circuits involved in anesthesia induced unconsciousness are still not fully understood. To elucidate them valid animal models are necessary. Since the most commonly used species in neuroscience are mice, we established a murine model for commonly used anesthetics/sedatives and evaluated the epidural electroencephalographic (EEG) patterns during slow anesthesia induction and emergence. Forty-four mice underwent surgery in which we inserted a central venous catheter and implanted nine intracranial electrodes above the prefrontal, motor, sensory, and visual cortex. After at least one week of recovery, mice were anesthetized either by inhalational sevoflurane or intravenous propofol, ketamine, or dexmedetomidine. We evaluated the loss and return of righting reflex (LORR/RORR) and recorded the electrocorticogram. For spectral analysis we focused on the prefrontal and visual cortex. In addition to analyzing the power spectral density at specific time points we evaluated the changes in the spectral power distribution longitudinally. The median time to LORR after start anesthesia ranged from 1080 [1st quartile: 960; 3rd quartile: 1080]s under sevoflurane anesthesia to 1541 [1455; 1890]s with ketamine. Around LORR sevoflurane as well as propofol induced a decrease in the theta/alpha band and an increase in the beta/gamma band. Dexmedetomidine infusion resulted in a shift towards lower frequencies with an increase in the delta range. Ketamine induced stronger activity in the higher frequencies. Our results showed substance-specific changes in EEG patterns during slow anesthesia induction. These patterns were partially identical to previous observations in humans, but also included significant differences, especially in the low frequencies. Our study emphasizes strengths and limitations of murine models in neuroscience and provides an important basis for future studies investigating complex neurophysiological mechanisms.


Subject(s)
Anesthetics, Inhalation , Dexmedetomidine , Electroencephalography , Ketamine , Propofol , Sevoflurane , Animals , Mice , Ketamine/pharmacology , Ketamine/administration & dosage , Sevoflurane/pharmacology , Sevoflurane/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/pharmacology , Electroencephalography/drug effects , Electroencephalography/methods , Propofol/pharmacology , Propofol/administration & dosage , Male , Anesthetics, Inhalation/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Inhalation/administration & dosage , Reflex, Righting/drug effects , Reflex, Righting/physiology , Mice, Inbred C57BL , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Anesthetics, Intravenous/pharmacology , Anesthetics, Intravenous/administration & dosage , Anesthesia/methods
12.
BMC Geriatr ; 24(1): 396, 2024 May 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38704540

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines and other sedative hypnotic drugs (BSHs) are frequently prescribed for sleep problems, but cause substantial adverse effects, particularly in older adults. Improving knowledge on barriers, facilitators and needs of primary care providers (PCPs) to BSH deprescribing could help reduce BSH use and thus negative effects. METHODS: We conducted a mixed methods study (February-May 2023) including a survey, semi-structured interviews and focus groups with PCPs in Switzerland. We assessed barriers, facilitators and needs of PCPs to BSH deprescribing. Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively, qualitative data deductively and inductively using the Theoretical Domain Framework (TDF). Quantitative and qualitative data were integrated using meta-interferences. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 126 PCPs (53% female) and 16 PCPs participated to a focus group or individual interview. The main barriers to BSH deprescribing included patient and PCP lack of knowledge on BSH effects and side effects, lack of PCP education on treatment of sleep problems and BSH deprescribing, patient lack of motivation, PCP lack of time, limited access to cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia and absence of public dialogue on BSHs. Facilitators included informing on side effects to motivate patients to discontinue BSHs and start of deprescribing during a hospitalization. Main PCP needs were practical recommendations for pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment of sleep problems and deprescribing schemes. Patient brochures were wished by 69% of PCPs. PCPs suggested the brochures to contain explanations about risks and benefits of BSHs, sleep hygiene and sleep physiology, alternative treatments, discontinuation process and tapering schemes. CONCLUSION: The barriers and facilitators as well as PCP needs and opinions on patient material we identified can be used to develop PCP training and material on BSH deprescribing, which could help reduce the inappropriate use of BSHs for sleep problems.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines , Deprescriptions , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Humans , Female , Male , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Aged , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Middle Aged , Switzerland , Primary Health Care/methods , Attitude of Health Personnel , Adult , Focus Groups/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physicians, Primary Care
13.
BMC Prim Care ; 25(1): 167, 2024 May 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38755534

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Australia, motor vehicle crashes (MVC)-related health data are available from insurance claims and hospitals but not from primary care settings. This study aimed to identify the frequency of MVC-related consultations in Australian general practices, explore the pharmacological management of health conditions related to those crashes, and investigate general practitioners' (GPs) perceived barriers and enablers in managing these patients. METHODS: Mixed-methods study. The quantitative component explored annual MVC-related consultation rates over seven years, the frequency of chronic pain, depression, anxiety or sleep issues after MVC, and management with opioids, antidepressants, anxiolytics or sedatives in a sample of 1,438,864 patients aged 16 + years attending 402 Australian general practices (MedicineInsight). Subsequently, we used content analysis of 81 GPs' qualitative responses to an online survey that included some of our quantitative findings to explore their experiences and attitudes to managing patients after MVC. RESULTS: MVC-related consultation rates remained stable between 2012 and 2018 at around 9.0 per 10,000 consultations. In 2017/2018 compared to their peers, those experiencing a MVC had a higher frequency of chronic pain (48% vs. 26%), depression/anxiety (20% vs. 13%) and sleep issues (7% vs. 4%). In general, medications were prescribed more after MVC. Opioid prescribing was much higher among patients after MVC than their peers, whether they consulted for chronic pain (23.8% 95%CI 21.6;26.0 vs. 15.2%, 95%CI 14.5;15.8 in 2017/2018, respectively) or not (15.8%, 95%CI 13.9;17.6 vs. 6.7%, 95% CI 6.4;7.0 in 2017/2018). Qualitative analyses identified a lack of guidelines, local referral pathways and decision frameworks as critical barriers for GPs to manage patients after MVC. GPs also expressed interest in having better access to management tools for specific MVC-related consequences (e.g., whiplash/seatbelt injuries, acute/chronic pain management, mental health issues). CONCLUSION: Chronic pain, mental health issues and the prescription of opioids were more frequent among patients experiencing MVC. This reinforces the relevance of appropriate management to limit the physical and psychological impact of MVC. GPs identified a lack of available resources (e.g. education, checklists and management support tools) for managing MVC-related consequences, and the need for local referral pathways and specific guidelines to escalate treatments.


Subject(s)
Accidents, Traffic , Chronic Pain , General Practice , Humans , Australia/epidemiology , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Chronic Pain/epidemiology , Chronic Pain/psychology , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Psychological Trauma/epidemiology , Young Adult , Anxiety/epidemiology , Anxiety/drug therapy , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/drug therapy , Depression/epidemiology , Depression/drug therapy , Aged , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , General Practitioners/psychology , Anti-Anxiety Agents/therapeutic use
14.
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak ; 34(5): 509-513, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38720207

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the role of single dose of dexmedetomidine (0.5 mcg/kg) in reducing the incidence and severity of postoperative emergence delirium (EmD). STUDY DESIGN: A randomised controlled trial. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Anaesthesia, Security Forces Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, from 1st December 2022 to 30th March 2023. METHODOLOGY: Patients, aged between 18-65 years, with ASA 1-3 scheduled to undergo nasal surgeries under general anaesthesia, were inducted in the study. Exclusion criteria were patient refusal, later request for removal from the study, inability to give consent, known allergy to dexmedetomidine, body mass index (BMI) more than 35, history of obstructive sleep apnoea, history of psychiatric illness, pregnancy, and presence of liver and renal diseases. The primary outcome measure of the study was the incidence of emergence delirium in the postoperative period. RESULTS: The frequency of EmD after nasal surgery was 52.38% in the control group compared to 14.28% in the dexmedetomidine group (p = 0.01). Pain scores were not statistically different between the two groups. The duration of post anaesthesia care unit (PACU) stay was significantly lesser in dexmedetomidine group (p <0.001). The satisfaction score on the visual analogue scale (VAS) was also found to be higher in patients who received intravenous dexmedetomidine (p <0.001). CONCLUSION: The use of single dose dexmedetomidine before extubation in nasal surgeries reduces the EmD and improves patient satisfaction. KEY WORDS: Dexmedetomidine, Emergence delirium, Nasal surgery, Opioid consumption, Pain control.


Subject(s)
Airway Extubation , Dexmedetomidine , Emergence Delirium , Nasal Surgical Procedures , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/administration & dosage , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Female , Male , Adult , Emergence Delirium/prevention & control , Emergence Delirium/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Nasal Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Young Adult , Anesthesia, General , Adolescent , Aged , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Saudi Arabia , Anesthesia Recovery Period , Administration, Intravenous , Incidence
15.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; 5: CD012361, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38695625

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha-2 agonist with minimal impact on the haemodynamic profile. It is thought to be safer than morphine or stronger opioids, which are drugs currently used for analgesia and sedation in newborn infants. Dexmedetomidine is increasingly being used in children and infants despite not being licenced for analgesia in this group. OBJECTIVES: To determine the overall effectiveness and safety of dexmedetomidine for sedation and analgesia in newborn infants receiving mechanical ventilation compared with other non-opioids, opioids, or placebo. SEARCH METHODS: We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and two trial registries in September 2023. SELECTION CRITERIA: We planned to include randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs evaluating the effectiveness of dexmedetomidine compared with other non-opioids, opioids, or placebo for sedation and analgesia in neonates (aged under four weeks) requiring mechanical ventilation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard Cochrane methods. Our primary outcomes were level of sedation and level of analgesia. Our secondary outcomes included days on mechanical ventilation, number of infants requiring additional medication for sedation or analgesia (or both), hypotension, neonatal mortality, and neurodevelopmental outcomes. We planned to use GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. MAIN RESULTS: We identified no eligible studies for inclusion. We identified four ongoing studies, two of which appear to be eligible for inclusion; they will compare dexmedetomidine with fentanyl in newborn infants requiring surgery. We listed the other two studies as awaiting classification pending assessment of full reports. One study will compare dexmedetomidine with morphine in asphyxiated newborns undergoing hypothermia, and the other (mixed population, age up to three years) will evaluate dexmedetomidine versus ketamine plus dexmedetomidine for echocardiography. The planned sample size of the four studies ranges from 40 to 200 neonates. Data from these studies may provide some evidence for dexmedetomidine efficacy and safety. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Despite the increasing use of dexmedetomidine, there is insufficient evidence supporting its routine use for analgesia and sedation in newborn infants on mechanical ventilation. Furthermore, data on dexmedetomidine safety are scarce, and there are no data available on its long-term effects. Future studies should address the efficacy, safety, and long-term effects of dexmedetomidine as a single drug therapy for sedation and analgesia in newborn infants.


Subject(s)
Dexmedetomidine , Hypnotics and Sedatives , Respiration, Artificial , Humans , Dexmedetomidine/therapeutic use , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Infant, Newborn , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Morphine/therapeutic use , Analgesia/methods , Analgesics, Non-Narcotic/therapeutic use
16.
Cleve Clin J Med ; 91(5): 293-299, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692699

ABSTRACT

Benzodiazepines are widely used but can cause considerable harm, including sedation, addiction, falls, fractures, and cognitive impairment, especially with long-term use and in elderly patients. The authors propose a public health approach to reduce the potential for harm when using benzodiazepines to treat insomnia. Primary prevention involves judicious patient selection and patient education. Secondary prevention requires keeping the duration of use as short as possible according to guidelines. Tertiary prevention, for patients who have been taking a benzodiazepine for a long time, uses shared decision-making to introduce a gradual and carefully monitored taper.


Subject(s)
Benzodiazepines , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders , Humans , Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders/drug therapy , Benzodiazepines/adverse effects , Benzodiazepines/therapeutic use , Public Health , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/therapeutic use , Patient Selection , Patient Education as Topic , Primary Prevention/methods
17.
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med ; 32(1): 39, 2024 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) is a technique of administering sedatives to induce a state that allows the patient to tolerate painful procedures while maintaining cardiorespiratory function, a condition that is frequently desired prehospital. Non-physician prehospital clinicians often have a limited scope of practice when it comes to providing analgesia and sedation; sometimes resulting in a crew request for back-up from physician-staffed prehospital services.". This is also the case if sedation is desirable. Advanced practice providers (APPs), who are legally authorized and trained to carry out this procedure, may be a solution when the physician-staffed service is not available or will not be available in time. METHODS: The aim of this study is to gain insight in the circumstances in which an APP, working at the Dutch ambulance service "RAV Brabant MWN" from January 2019 to December 2022, uses propofol for PSA or to provide sedation. With this a retrospective observational document study we describe the characteristics of patients and ambulance runs and evaluates the interventions in terms of safety. RESULTS: During the study period, the APPs administered propofol 157 times for 135 PSA and in 22 cases for providing sedation. The most common indication was musculoskeletal trauma such as fracture care or the reduction of joint dislocation. In 91% of the situations where propofol was used, the predetermined goal e.g. alignment of fractured extremity, repositioning of luxated joint or providing sedation the goal was achieved. There were 12 cases in which one or more adverse events were documented and all were successfully resolved by the APP. There were no cases of laryngospam, airway obstruction, nor anaphylaxis. None of the adverse events led to unexpected hospitalization or death. CONCLUSION: During the study period, the APPs performed 135 PSAs and provided 22 sedations. The success rate of predetermined goals was higher than that stated in the literature. Although there were a number of side effects, their incidences were lower than those reported in the literature, and these were resolved by the APP during the episode of care. Applying a PSA by an APP at the EMS "RAV Brabant MWN" appears to be safe with a high success rate.


Subject(s)
Emergency Medical Services , Humans , Netherlands , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Hypnotics and Sedatives/administration & dosage , Conscious Sedation/methods , Middle Aged , Adult , Propofol/administration & dosage , Aged
18.
Can Vet J ; 65(4): 351-358, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38562980

ABSTRACT

Objective: This study aimed to compare the sedative effects of dexmedetomidine administered to dogs subcutaneously (SC) at the Governing Vessel 20 (GV20) acupuncture point and at another point on the head. Animals and procedure: Ten client-owned dogs were included. Dogs were sedated 2 times, 14 d apart, with 200 µg/m2 of dexmedetomidine, SC, at GV20 and at a point at the base of the ear (SC-head). The sedation was assessed with a sedation scale and a Dynamic and Interactive Visual Analogue Scale (DIVAS). The ease of performing radiographic studies, physiological parameters, and adverse events were recorded. Statistical linear mixed-effect models (ANOVA) were applied. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05. Results: The time to sedation and sedation scores were similar for both groups. The level of sedation achieved was adequate to perform orthopedic radiographs for 9/10 (90%) cases in the GV20 group and 8/10 (80%) cases in the SC-head group. Heart and respiratory rates decreased significantly over time in both groups (P < 0.001). Adverse events were infrequent and self-limiting. Conclusion: Our study provides evidence that SC administration of dexmedetomidine on the head, at the GV20 point or at the base of the ear, is easy and provides a sufficient level of sedation to obtain orthopedic radiographs in dogs.


Comparaison de la sédation avec de la dexmédétomidine administrée par voie sous-cutanée à deux sites différents sur la tête de chiens. Objectif: Cette étude a pour but de comparer les effets sédatifs de la dexmédétomidine administrée par voie sous-cutanée (SC) au point d'acupuncture VG20 et à un autre point sur la tête, non lié à la relaxation/sédation, chez le chien. Animaux et procédure: Dix chiens de clients ont été inclus dans cette étude clinique, prospective, croisée, randomisée et à l'aveugle. Les chiens ont été sédatés deux fois, à 14 jours d'intervalle, avec une injection de 200 µg/m2 de dexmédétomidine sous-cutanée au point d'acupuncture VG20 et à un autre point sur la tête, à la base de l'oreille (SC-tête). La durée et la qualité de la sédation ont été évaluées avec une échelle de sédation et une échelle analogue visuelle dynamique et interactive (DIVAS). La facilité de réaliser des études radiographiques, les paramètres physiologiques et les effets secondaires ont été enregistrés. Des modèles statistiques linéaires à effet mixte (ANOVA) ont été réalisés. Les résultats étaient considérés comme significatifs quand P < 0,05. Résultats: Le temps nécessaire pour atteindre un niveau de sédation adéquat et les scores de sédation étaient comparables entre les deux groupes. Le niveau de sédation était adéquat pour réaliser des radiographies orthopédiques chez 9/10 (90 %) des cas dans le groupe VG20 et 8/10 (80 %) des cas dans le groupe SC-tête. Les fréquences cardiaque et respiratoire diminuaient significativement dans le temps pour les 2 groupes (P < 0,001). Les effets indésirables étaient peu fréquents et auto-limitants. Conclusion: Notre étude suggère que l'administration sous-cutanée de dexmédétomidine sur la tête, que ce soit au point VG20 ou à la base de l'oreille, est facile et permet d'obtenir un niveau de sédation suffisant pour réaliser des radiographies orthopédiques chez des chiens sains.(Traduit par les auteurs).


Subject(s)
Anesthesia , Dexmedetomidine , Humans , Dogs , Animals , Dexmedetomidine/adverse effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Anesthesia/veterinary
20.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 124, 2024 Apr 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38566038

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Proper sedation of patients, particularly elderly individuals, who are more susceptible to sedation-related complications, is of significant importance in endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a low-dose combination of midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol for deep sedation in elderly patients undergoing ERCP, compared to a group of middle-aged patients. METHODS: The medical records of 610 patients with common bile duct stones who underwent elective ERCP under deep sedation with a three-drug regimen, including midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol at Shandong Provincial Third Hospital from January 2023 to September 2023 were retrospectively reviewed in this study. Patients were categorized into three groups: middle-aged (50-64 years, n = 202), elderly (65-79 years, n = 216), and very elderly (≥ 80 years, n = 192). Intraoperative vital signs and complications were compared among these groups. RESULTS: The three groups showed no significant difference in terms of intraoperative variation of systolic blood pressure (P = 0.291), diastolic blood pressure (P = 0.737), heart rate (P = 0.107), peripheral oxygen saturation (P = 0.188), bispectral index (P = 0.158), and the occurrence of sedation-related adverse events including hypotension (P = 0.170) and hypoxemia (P = 0.423). CONCLUSION: The results suggest that a low-dose three-drug regimen consisting of midazolam, alfentanil, and propofol seems safe and effective for deep sedation of elderly and very elderly patients undergoing ERCP procedures. However, further studies are required to verify these findings and clarify the benefits and risks of this method.


Subject(s)
Deep Sedation , Propofol , Aged , Middle Aged , Humans , Propofol/adverse effects , Midazolam/adverse effects , Alfentanil/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/adverse effects , Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde/methods , Hypnotics and Sedatives/adverse effects , Deep Sedation/adverse effects , Deep Sedation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Conscious Sedation/adverse effects , Conscious Sedation/methods
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...