A Meta-analysis of Comparative Outcome and Cost-Effectiveness of Internal Iliac Artery Embolization with Vascular Plug Versus Coil.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the comparative outcome and cost of vascular plugs versus coils for internal iliac artery embolization prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. METHOD: A search was performed for internal iliac artery embolization studies in adult patients from January 2005 to July 2018. Inclusion criteria included embolization of unilateral or bilateral IIAs with either coils or plug(s) prior to endovascular aortic repair. Meta-analysis was performed using a fixed effects model with the inverse variance-weighted average method to determine pooled differences in surgical time, fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, number of devices used, cost of devices, and post-embolization buttock claudication. Heterogeneity was assessed using the Chi-square statistic. Pooled outcomes were compared, and quality assessments were evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale. RESULT: Six studies met inclusion criteria. One hundred and eighty-one patients were included in the study, of which 87 were in the plug group and 94 in the coil group. Vascular plug use led to 35.32 min shorter surgery time (p < 0.001), 15.64 min less fluoroscopy time (p < 0.001), 157,599 mGy/cm2 less radiation (p < 0.001), and 5.88 fewer occlusive devices (p < 0.001) than the use of coils alone. The estimated total cost of occlusion devices was $575.45 USD lower in the plug cohort (p < 0.001). The development of buttock claudication 12 months after EVAR was 11% less likely in the plug cohort but was not statistically significant (p = 0.71). CONCLUSION: The vascular plug appears to be superior to coils in embolization of the internal iliac artery due to shorter surgical time, fluoroscopy time, radiation exposure, and total cost of occlusive devices.

Editor's Choice - ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus): A French Randomized Controlled Trial of Endovascular Versus Open Surgical Repair of Ruptured Aorto-iliac Aneurysms.

OBJECTIVES/BACKGROUND: ECAR (Endovasculaire ou Chirurgie dans les Anévrysmes aorto-iliaques Rompus) is a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial including consecutive patients with ruptured aorto-iliac aneurysms (rAIA) eligible for treatment by either endovascular (EVAR) or open surgical repair (OSR). Inclusion criteria were hemodynamic stability and computed tomography scan demonstrating aorto-iliac rupture. METHODS: Randomization was done by week, synchronously in all centers. The primary end point was 30 day mortality. Secondary end points were post-operative morbidity, length of stay in the intensive care unit (ICU), amount of blood transfused (units) and 6 month mortality. RESULTS: From January 2008 to January 2013, 107 patients (97 men, 10 women; median age 74.4 years) were enrolled in 14 centers: 56 (52.3%) in the EVAR group and 51 (47.7%) in the OSR group. The groups were similar in terms of age, sex, consciousness, systolic blood pressure, Hardman index, IGSII score, type of rupture, use of endoclamping balloon, and levels of troponin, creatinine, and hemoglobin. Delay to treatment was higher in the EVAR group (2.9 vs. 1.3 hours; p < .005). Mortality at 30 days and 1 year were not different between the groups (18% in the EVAR group vs. 24% in the OSR group at 30 days, and 30% vs. 35%, respectively, at 1 year). Total respiratory support time was lower in the EVAR group than in the OSR group (59.3 hours vs. 180.3 hours; p = .007), as were pulmonary complications (15.4% vs. 41.5%, respectively; p = .050), total blood transfusion (6.8 vs. 10.9, respectively; p = .020), and duration of ICU stay (7 days vs. 11.9 days, respectively; p = .010). CONCLUSION: In this study, EVAR was found to be equal to OSR in terms of 30 day and 1 year mortality. However, EVAR was associated with less severe complications and less consumption of hospital resources than OSR.

Occlusion of the internal iliac artery prior EVAR: comparison of coils and plugs.

PURPOSE: We compared occlusion of the internal iliac artery (IIA) using coils or the Amplatzer vascular plug (AVP) II prior to endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Occlusion of the IIA was performed in 32 patients (aged 74 ± 8 years) using coils (N = 17) or the AVP II (N = 15). We retrospectively compared procedural data, initial success, and clinical outcome in a 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Occlusion was successful in all patients without detection of an endoleak after 12 months. Procedure time and fluoroscopy time for coils versus plugs were 77 ± 35 versus 43 ± 13 minutes and 36 ± 19 versus 18 ± 8 minutes, respectively (P < .003). Incidence of initial buttock claudication (BC) for coils versus plugs was 47% versus 27% and was significantly more severe after coil occlusion (P = .03). After a 12-month follow-up, 2 patients of each group reported of mild BC. CONCLUSION: Occlusion of the IIA is safe and effective using coils or plugs. Initial BC is significantly more severe when coils are used, but after a 12-month follow-up, there is no significant difference. Using a plug is associated with a significant reduction of procedure time and radiation exposure.

Endovascular aneurysm repair with preservation of the internal iliac artery using the iliac branch graft device.

OBJECTIVES: Aortoiliac aneurysms comprise up to 43% of the specialist endovascular caseload. In such cases endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) requires distal extension of the aortoiliac endograft beyond the ostium of the internal iliac artery (IIA) and into the external iliac artery, conventionally necessitating the embolisation of one or both IIA. This has been associated with a wide range of complications, and the use of an Iliac Branch-graft Device (IBD) offers an appealing endovascular solution. DESIGN: Medline, trial registries, conference proceedings and article reference lists were searched to identify case series reporting IBD use. Data were extracted for review. RESULTS: Nine series have reported the use of IBD in a total of 196 patients. Technical success was 85-100%. Median operating times were 101-290min and median contrast dose was 58-208g, with no aneurysm-related mortality. Claudication developed in 12/24 patients after IBD occlusion. One type I endoleak and two type III endoleaks occurred and were managed endovascularly. Re-occlusion occurred in 24/196 patients. CONCLUSION: IBD was performed with high technical success rates and encouraging mid-term patency. Formalised risk stratification and morphological data are required to identify the group of patients who will benefit most. Cost-effectiveness appraisals are needed for this technique.

Screening cost for abdominal aortic aneurysms: Japan-based estimates.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the screening procedures in Japan economically focusing on the screening costs and the hospital costs for abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery. METHODS: A total of 10,057 residents, 60 years of age or older, including 4 247 men and 5 810 women, participated in the screening test for AAA using ultrasound. RESULTS: Aneurysms were detected in 34 participants, including 32 men and 2 women. The detection rate of AAA was 0.8% in men, 0.03% in women, and 0.3% in total. It cost 8 US dollars to screen each participant, and the cost to detect each aneurysm was thus estimated at 1,250 dollars in men, 23,240 dollars in women, and 2,366 dollars in total. The difference in the mean hospital cost between ruptured and nonruptured AAA was 21,833 dollars in our recent cases. Obesity, male sex, and smoking habits were all significant risk factors for AAA. CONCLUSION: Screening for AAA using ultrasound is useful not only for the early detection of AAA but also for a reduction in the overall medical cost.