ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer has improved with the use of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). Yet, even with MRI-guided biopsy 15%-35% of high-risk lesions (Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] 4 and 5) are histologically benign. It is unclear if these false positives are due to diagnostic/sampling errors or pathophysiological alterations. To better understand this, we tested histologically benign PI-RAD 4 and 5 lesions for common malignant epigenetic alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MRI-guided in-bore biopsy samples were collected from 45 patients with PI-RADS 4 (n = 31) or 5 (n = 14) lesions. Patients had a median clinical follow-up of 3.8 years. High-risk mpMRI patients were grouped based on their histology into biopsy positive for tumor (BPT; n = 28) or biopsy negative for tumor (BNT; n = 17). From these biopsy samples, DNA methylation of well-known tumor suppressor genes (APC, GSTP1, and RARß2) was quantified. RESULTS: Similar to previous work we observed high rates of promoter methylation at GSTP1 (92.7%), RARß2 (57.3%), and APC (37.8%) in malignant BPT samples but no methylation in benign TURP chips. Interestingly, similar to the malignant samples the BNT biopsies also had increased methylation at the promoter of GSTP1 (78.8%) and RARß2 (34.6%). However, despite these epigenetic alterations none of these BNT patients developed prostate cancer, and those who underwent repeat mpMRI (n = 8) demonstrated either radiological regression or stability. CONCLUSIONS: Histologically benign PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions harbor prostate cancer-associated epigenetic alterations.
Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Image-Guided Biopsy , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Biomarkers/analysis , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Epigenesis, Genetic , False Positive Reactions , Genes, Tumor Suppressor/physiology , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
When multiple cores are biopsied from a single magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted lesion, Gleason grade may be assigned for each core separately or for all cores of the lesion in aggregate. Because of the potential for disparate grades, an optimal method for pathology reporting MRI lesion grade awaits validation. We examined our institutional experience on the concordance of biopsy grade with subsequent radical prostatectomy (RP) grade of targeted lesions when grade is determined on individual versus aggregate core basis. For 317 patients (with 367 lesions) who underwent MRI-targeted biopsy followed by RP, targeted lesion grade was assigned as (1) global Grade Group (GG), aggregated positive cores; (2) highest GG (highest grade in single biopsy core); and (3) largest volume GG (grade in the core with longest cancer linear length). The 3 biopsy grades were compared (equivalence, upgrade, or downgrade) with the final grade of the lesion in the RP, using κ and weighted κ coefficients. The biopsy global, highest, and largest GGs were the same as the final RP GG in 73%, 68%, 62% cases, respectively (weighted κ: 0.77, 0.79, and 0.71). For cases where the targeted lesion biopsy grade scores differed from each other when assigned by global, highest, and largest GG, the concordance with the targeted lesion RP GG was 69%, 52%, 31% for biopsy global, highest, and largest GGs tumors (weighted κ: 0.65, 0.68, 0.59). Overall, global, highest, and largest GG of the targeted biopsy show substantial agreement with RP-targeted lesion GG, however targeted global GG yields slightly better agreement than either targeted highest or largest GG. This becomes more apparent in nearly one third of cases when each of the 3 targeted lesion level biopsy scores differ. These results support the use of global (aggregate) GG for reporting of MRI lesion-targeted biopsies, while further validations are awaited.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/standards , Neoplasm Grading/standards , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Humans , Male , Medical Records/standards , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatectomy , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Adequate tumor tissue is required to make the best treatment choice for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Transbronchial biopsy (TBB) by endobronchial ultrasonography with a guide sheath (EBUS-GS) is useful to diagnose peripheral lung lesions. The data of tumor cell numbers obtained by two different sizes of GSs is limited. We conducted this study to investigate the utility of a large GS kit to obtain many tumor cells in patients with NSCLC. METHODS: Patients with a peripheral lung lesion and suspected of NSCLC were prospectively enrolled. They underwent TBB with a 5.9-mm diameter bronchoscope with a large GS. When the lesion was invisible in EBUS, we changed to a thinner bronchoscope and TBB was performed with a small GS. We compared the tumor cell number prospectively obtained with a large GS (prospective large GS group) and those previously obtained with a small GS (small GS cohort). The primary endpoint was the tumor cell number per sample, and we assessed characteristics of lesions that could be obtained by TBB with large GS. RESULTS: Biopsy with large GS was performed in 55 of 87 patients (63.2%), and 37 were diagnosed with NSCLC based on histological samples. The number of tumor cells per sample was not different between two groups (658±553 vs. 532±526, estimated difference between two groups with 95% confidence interval (CI); 125 (-125-376), p = 0.32). The sample size of the large GS group was significantly larger than that of the small GS cohort (1.75 mm2 vs. 0.83 mm2, estimated difference with 95% CI; 0.92 (0.60-1.23) mm2, p = 0.00000019). The lesion involving a third or less bronchus generation was predictive factors using large GS. CONCLUSIONS: The sample size obtained with large GS was significantly larger compared to that obtained with small GS, but there was no significant difference in tumor cell number. The 5.9-mm diameter bronchoscope with large GS can be used for lesions involving a third or less bronchus generation.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy/methods , Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung/pathology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Ultrasonography/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Bronchoscopy/standards , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Ultrasonography/standardsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Data on comparative efficacy of various available endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy (EUS-LB) needles are limited. We sought to compare the performance of a novel Franseen-tip 22G fine-needle biopsy (FNB) device to that of 19G needle platforms for liver parenchyma. METHODS: Consecutive patients referred for EUS and suspected to have hepatic parenchymal disease underwent EUS-LB using different EUS needles and were included in this retrospective study. Two blinded expert liver pathologists independently reviewed and reported on: total number of tissue fragments, length of longest fragment, number of complete and incomplete portal tracts (CPT and IPT), and specimen adequacy. RESULTS: A 22G Franseen-tip needle (A) was used in 30 patients; 19G Tru-Cut needle (B) in 50 patients; 19G reverse beveled non-Tru-Cut needle (C) in 27 patients; and a 19G flexible non-Tru-Cut needle (D) in 28 patients. In the order of needles, A, B, C and D, > 10 tissue fragments were obtained in 100%, 6%, 82%, and 96% samples, the mean number of CPTs was 6.9; 3.0; 7.3; and 16.9, length of longest fragment was 3.8, 4. 7, 3.9, and 8.4 mm, and specimen adequacy was 66.7%, 46%, 82.1%, and 81.5%, respectively. A positive correlation was obtained between number of CPTs and length of longest fragment in samples accrued by 19G needles. CONCLUSION: EUS-LB specimens using 22G Franseen-tip needle appear highly fragmented, leading to inferior specimen adequacy compared to 19G non-Tru-Cut needles. We also report on using length of longest fragment as an additional criterion for specimen adequacy as it positively correlates with number of CPTs standard.
Subject(s)
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/standards , Liver Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Needles/standards , Adult , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/methods , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Liver Diseases/pathology , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
The World Health Organization (WHO) and numerous expert guidelines for lymphoma diagnosis and subclassification advocate the use of histology from surgical nodal excision biopsy (SEB) over core needle biopsy (CNB) due to perceived higher diagnostic yield. CNB is associated with lower morbidity and is more cost-effective compared to SEB. Furthermore, current practice increasingly demonstrates material obtained from CNB can rapidly diagnose individuals with a clinical suspicion of lymphoma and allow initiation of treatment in the majority of patients. We performed a literature review to assess the suitability of CNB in lymphoma diagnosis given recent advances in radiological and histopathological techniques in obtaining and processing tissue. Additionally, expert international guidelines in lymphoma diagnosis were compared. We found that CNB demonstrated a diagnostic efficacy between 79% and 97% (median 91%) where the diagnostic outcome was conclusive with full lymphoma subclassification. Studies demonstrate that there is a high diagnostic reproducibility amongst haematopathologists (87%-93%) in lymphoma diagnoses with full subtyping from material obtained via CNB. Furthermore, CNB is a safe, rapid and reliable method of obtaining tissue from lymph nodes for histopathological analysis. These procedures are minimally invasive, well-tolerated and should be considered the first-line diagnostic approach in clinical practice in patients with suspected lymphoproliferative disorders.
Subject(s)
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Image-Guided Biopsy , Lymphoproliferative Disorders/diagnosis , Biomarkers, Tumor , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Delayed Diagnosis , Diagnosis, Differential , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Lymph Node Excision , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Reproducibility of Results , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
CONTEXT.: Controversies and uncertainty persist in prostate cancer grading. OBJECTIVE.: To update grading recommendations. DATA SOURCES.: Critical review of the literature along with pathology and clinician surveys. CONCLUSIONS.: Percent Gleason pattern 4 (%GP4) is as follows: (1) report %GP4 in needle biopsy with Grade Groups (GrGp) 2 and 3, and in needle biopsy on other parts (jars) of lower grade in cases with at least 1 part showing Gleason score (GS) 4 + 4 = 8; and (2) report %GP4: less than 5% or less than 10% and 10% increments thereafter. Tertiary grade patterns are as follows: (1) replace "tertiary grade pattern" in radical prostatectomy (RP) with "minor tertiary pattern 5 (TP5)," and only use in RP with GrGp 2 or 3 with less than 5% Gleason pattern 5; and (2) minor TP5 is noted along with the GS, with the GrGp based on the GS. Global score and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-targeted biopsies are as follows: (1) when multiple undesignated cores are taken from a single MRI-targeted lesion, an overall grade for that lesion is given as if all the involved cores were one long core; and (2) if providing a global score, when different scores are found in the standard and the MRI-targeted biopsy, give a single global score (factoring both the systematic standard and the MRI-targeted positive cores). Grade Groups are as follows: (1) Grade Groups (GrGp) is the terminology adopted by major world organizations; and (2) retain GS 3 + 5 = 8 in GrGp 4. Cribriform carcinoma is as follows: (1) report the presence or absence of cribriform glands in biopsy and RP with Gleason pattern 4 carcinoma. Intraductal carcinoma (IDC-P) is as follows: (1) report IDC-P in biopsy and RP; (2) use criteria based on dense cribriform glands (>50% of the gland is composed of epithelium relative to luminal spaces) and/or solid nests and/or marked pleomorphism/necrosis; (3) it is not necessary to perform basal cell immunostains on biopsy and RP to identify IDC-P if the results would not change the overall (highest) GS/GrGp part per case; (4) do not include IDC-P in determining the final GS/GrGp on biopsy and/or RP; and (5) "atypical intraductal proliferation (AIP)" is preferred for an intraductal proliferation of prostatic secretory cells which shows a greater degree of architectural complexity and/or cytological atypia than typical high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia, yet falling short of the strict diagnostic threshold for IDC-P. Molecular testing is as follows: (1) Ki67 is not ready for routine clinical use; (2) additional studies of active surveillance cohorts are needed to establish the utility of PTEN in this setting; and (3) dedicated studies of RNA-based assays in active surveillance populations are needed to substantiate the utility of these expensive tests in this setting. Artificial intelligence and novel grading schema are as follows: (1) incorporating reactive stromal grade, percent GP4, minor tertiary GP5, and cribriform/intraductal carcinoma are not ready for adoption in current practice.
Subject(s)
Neoplasm Grading/standards , Pathology/standards , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Biomarkers, Tumor/analysis , Biomarkers, Tumor/genetics , Biopsy, Needle/standards , Consensus , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Immunohistochemistry/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Male , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostatic Neoplasms/chemistry , Prostatic Neoplasms/geneticsSubject(s)
Biopsy, Needle/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Quality Improvement/standards , Quality Indicators, Health Care/standards , Radiology, Interventional/standards , Age Factors , Biopsy, Needle/adverse effects , Consensus , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/adverse effects , Patient Safety/standards , Predictive Value of Tests , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy which reveals no cancer may impart reassurance beyond that offered by ultrasound guided biopsy. However, followup of men after a negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy has been mostly by prostate specific antigen testing and reports of followup tissue confirmation are few. We investigated the incidence of clinically significant prostate cancer in such men who, because of persistent cancer suspicion, subsequently underwent a repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were all men with a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy who underwent at least 1 further magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy due to continued clinical suspicion of clinically significant prostate cancer (September 2009 to July 2019). Biopsies were magnetic resonance imaging-ultrasound fusion with targeted and systematic cores. Regions of interest from initial magnetic resonance imaging and any new regions of interest at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were targeted. The primary end point was detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason Grade Group 2 or greater). RESULTS: Of 2,716 men 733 had a negative initial magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Study subjects were 73/733 who underwent followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy. Median (IQR) age and prostate specific antigen density were 64 years (59-67) and 0.12 ng/ml/cc (0.08-0.17), respectively. Baseline PI-RADS® scores were 3 or greater in 74%. At followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy (median 2.4 years, IQR 1.3-3.6), 17/73 (23%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer. When followup magnetic resonance imaging revealed a lesion (PI-RADS 3 or greater), clinically significant prostate cancer was found in 17/53 (32%). When followup magnetic resonance imaging was negative (PI-RADS less than 3), cancer was not found (0/20) (p <0.01). Overall 54% of men with PI-RADS 5 at followup magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy were found to have clinically significant prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Men with negative magnetic resonance imaging following an initial negative magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy are unlikely to harbor clinically significant prostate cancer and may avoid repeat biopsy. However, when lesions are seen on followup magnetic resonance imaging, repeat magnetic resonance imaging guided biopsy is warranted.
Subject(s)
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/statistics & numerical data , Multimodal Imaging/statistics & numerical data , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/statistics & numerical data , False Negative Reactions , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Incidence , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Predictive Value of Tests , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Reproducibility of Results , Risk Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards , Ultrasonography, Interventional/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
PURPOSE: In this study we determined the optimal number of transperineal magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy cores per lesion needed for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 101 patients with at least 1 lesion with a PI-RADS® (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System) score of 3 or greater were recruited prospectively. At least 4 transperineal magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion targeted biopsy cores per lesion were performed, followed by systematic biopsy. The Kappa test was used to evaluate the consistency of the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate between different targeted biopsy cores and 4 or more cores, which was regarded as reference standard. RESULTS: In the total cohort of 101 patients 49 (48.5%), 55 (54.5%) and 57 (56.4%) were diagnosed with clinically significant prostate cancer by systematic biopsy, targeted biopsy or targeted biopsy plus systematic biopsy, respectively. As for the total of 161 lesions, the clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate based on 1, 2, 3, or 4 or more targeted biopsy cores was made in 27.3%, 32.9%, 37.3% and 39.1%, respectively. Three cores showed great consistency with 4 or more cores in clinically significant prostate cancer detection rate (Kappa coefficient of 0.961, p <0.001) with a sensitivity of 95.2% (95% CI 85.8-98.8), and only missed 3 lesions harboring clinically significant prostate cancer. Similar results were obtained in cases with PI-RADS 3 or 4 or maximal diameter of less than 1.5 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Three targeted biopsies per lesion were suitable during transperineal magnetic resonance imaging ultrasound fusion biopsy, especially for lesions of PI-RADS 3 or 4, or small lesions (maximal diameter less than 1.5 cm), which may help to tailor targeted prostate biopsy procedures.
Subject(s)
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/statistics & numerical data , Kallikreins/blood , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional , Male , Middle Aged , Multimodal Imaging/methods , Perineum/surgery , Prospective Studies , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Ultrasonography, InterventionalABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/AIM: To compare the diagnostic reliability, accuracy and safety of ultrasound-guided biopsy (Tru-Cut biopsy) and ascites puncture in patients with a primarily inoperable malignant ovarian tumor. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of the studied methods in consecutively examined patients and a prospective validation of these methods. 79 women with a suspected primarily inoperable ovarian tumor underwent Tru-Cut biopsies and were included in the ultrasound-guided biopsy group. In addition, 55 patients after ascites puncture were enrolled in the comparison group. Both procedures were performed in 48 patients for the prospective validation. RESULTS: Significant differences in favour of ultrasound-guided biopsy were found in all studied variables (malignancy confirmation 72.9% vs. 95.8%, tumor origin 52.1% vs. 89.6%, histologic subtype 43.8% vs. 85.4% and accuracy, i.e. agreement of preoperative and definitive diagnosis 43.7% vs. 95.4%). CONCLUSION: Ultrasound-guided biopsy is an accurate, reliable, safe and minimally invasive method. Owing to the high reliability and accuracy, it has the capacity to replace ascites puncture with cytologic examination or a more invasive method (laparoscopy, laparotomy) for adequate tumor sampling.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , Punctures , Ultrasonography , Ascites/pathology , Cytodiagnosis , Female , Histocytochemistry , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Punctures/methods , Reproducibility of Results , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography/methodsABSTRACT
Cryoprobe is a novel transbronchial biopsy (TBB) tool that yields larger tissue samples than forceps. Pathological diagnosis and biomarker analysis, such as genetic alterations and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, are paramount for precision medicine against lung cancer. We evaluated the safety and usefulness of cryoprobe TBB for lung cancer diagnosis and biomarker analysis. In this single-center, prospective single-arm study, patients suspected of having or diagnosed with primary lung cancer underwent cryoprobe TBB using flexible bronchoscopy after conventional forceps TBB from the same lesion. Cryoprobe TBB was performed in 121 patients. The incidence rate of severe bleeding and serious adverse events (4% [90% confidence interval: 2%-9%]) was significantly lower than the expected rate (20% with 30% threshold, P < 0.01). Combining both central and peripheral lesions, the diagnostic yield rate of cryoprobe samples was 76% and that of forceps samples was 84%. Compared with forceps TBB samples, cryoprobe TBB samples were larger (cryoprobe 15 mm2 vs forceps 2 mm2 ) and resulted in a larger proportion of definite histomorphological diagnosis (cryoprobe 86% vs forceps 74%, P < 0.01), larger amounts of DNA extracted from samples (median: cryoprobe, 1.60 µg vs forceps, 0.58 µg, P = 0.02) and RNA (median: cryoprobe, 0.62 µg vs forceps, 0.17 µg, P < 0.01) extracted from samples, and tended to yield greater rates of PD-L1 expression >1% (51% vs 42%). In conclusion, cryoprobe is a safe and useful tool for obtaining lung cancer tissue samples of adequate size and quality, which allow morphological diagnosis and biomarker analysis for precision medicine against lung cancer.
Subject(s)
Bronchoscopy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Lung Neoplasms/diagnosis , Precision Medicine , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers, Tumor , Bronchoscopy/standards , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Immunohistochemistry , Lung Neoplasms/etiology , Lung Neoplasms/metabolism , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Staging , Precision Medicine/methods , Precision Medicine/standards , Tumor Burden , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The clinical landscape of prostate biopsy (PB) is evolving with changes in procedures and techniques. Moreover, antibiotic resistance is increasing and influences the efficacy of pre-biopsy prophylactic regimens. Therefore, increasing antibiotic resistance may impact on clinical care, which probably results in differences between hospitals. The objective of our study is to determine the (variability in) current practices of PB in the Netherlands and to gain insight into Dutch urologists' perceptions of fluoroquinolone resistance and biopsy related infections. METHODS: An online questionnaire was prepared using SurveyMonkey® platform and distributed to all 420 members of the Dutch Association of Urology, who work in 81 Dutch hospitals. Information about PB techniques and periprocedural antimicrobial prophylaxis was collected. Urologists' perceptions regarding pre-biopsy antibiotic prophylaxis in an era of antibiotic resistance was assessed. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-one responses (38.3%) were analyzed representing 65 (80.3%) of all Dutch hospitals performing PB. Transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsy (TRUSPB) was performed in 64 (98.5%) hospitals. 43.1% of the hospitals (also) used other image-guided biopsy techniques. Twenty-three different empirical prophylactic regimens were reported among the hospitals. Ciprofloxacin was most commonly prescribed (84.4%). The duration ranged from one pre-biopsy dose (59.4%) to 5 days extended prophylaxis. 25.2% of the urologists experienced ciprofloxacin resistance as a current problem in the prevention of biopsy related infections and 73.6% as a future problem. CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide variation in practice patterns among Dutch urologists. TRUSPB is the most commonly used biopsy technique, but other image-guided biopsy techniques are increasingly used. Antimicrobial prophylaxis is not standardized and prolonged prophylaxis is common. The wide variation in practice patterns and lack of standardization underlines the need for evidence-based recommendations to guide urologists in choosing appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis for PB in the context of increasing antibiotic resistance.
Subject(s)
Antibiotic Prophylaxis/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Prostate/pathology , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Urologists/standards , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Antibiotic Prophylaxis/methods , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Bacterial/physiology , Female , Fluoroquinolones/administration & dosage , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Male , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiologyABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The diagnostic performance of ultrasound-fine needle aspiration to identify thyroid nodules harbouring malignancy remains variable. The aim of this study was to determine thyroid nodule size and cytological classification as predictors of malignancy risk. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis at an academic hospital involving 499 consecutive patients who underwent thyroid surgery between 2004 and 2015. RESULTS: A total of 503 thyroid nodules (499 patients, 84% female; mean age 50.8 years, standard deviation, SD, 15.4 years) were analysed. Of these, 19.5% were malignant. The mean (± SD) nodule size was 3.28 ± 1.63 cm and 3.27 ± 1.54 cm for benign and malignant nodules, respectively. The odds of malignancy for thyroid nodules less than 3.0 cm was similar to those for nodules of 3.0 cm or greater (0.26 compared with 0.29; p=0.77). Overall, the sensitivity and specificity of fine-needle aspiration in this cohort were 71.4% and 100%, respectively. The overall false negative rate was 5.4%. When the cut-off of 3.0 cm was used, the false negative rate in thyroid nodules less than 3.0 cm was 0% compared with 7.0% in nodules of 3.0 cm or greater. Thus, class (p<0.01) but not nodule size (p=0.49), was associated with higher malignancy risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that thyroid nodule size did not accurately predict the risk of thyroid malignancy irrespective of fine-needle aspiration cytology. Routine diagnostic thyroid lobectomy solely owing to thyroid nodule size of 3.0 cm or greater is currently not justified.
Subject(s)
Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Nodule/pathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/methods , Biopsy, Fine-Needle/standards , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Organ Size , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Thyroid Nodule/surgery , Thyroidectomy/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methods , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards , Young AdultABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Recently, a novel 22-gauge needle with three symmetric needle points and crown-shaped cutting heels, known as a Franseen needle, has been developed for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy (EUS-FNB). AIM: To assess the histological material acquisition rate and histological diagnostic capability of the 22-gauge Franseen needle (AC22) during EUS-FNB for solid lesions. METHODS: This study was designed as an open-label, multicenter, prospective, single-arm pilot study of EUS-FNB using AC22 for the diagnosis of solid lesions. Three passes of FNB using AC22 were performed for all lesions. The primary endpoints were the histological material acquisition rate and histological diagnostic capability. The secondary endpoints were the technical success rate, quality of histological samples, number of passes for diagnosis, and safety. RESULTS: Between September 2017 and May 2018, 75 patients were enrolled. The final diagnoses were malignancy in 65 and benign in 10. Three passes of FNB were technically successful in all patients. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for the malignancy of histological analyses were 92.3% (60/65), 100% (10/10), and 93.3% (70/75), respectively, for the first pass and 95.4% (62/65), 100% (10/10), and 96% (72/75), respectively, for combined three passes. The diagnostic yield plateaued after the second pass. Sufficient tissue samples for histological interpretation were obtained in 96% (72/75) and 100% (75/75) patients for the single pass and combined three passes, respectively. Two patients (2.7%) developed mild pancreatitis as an adverse event. CONCLUSION: EUS-FNB using AC22 showed high histological diagnostic capability with the high first pass yield. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY: UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN ID: UMIN000036641).
Subject(s)
Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/methods , Endosonography/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Needles , Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/instrumentation , Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration/standards , Endosonography/instrumentation , Endosonography/standards , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/instrumentation , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Needles/standards , Pilot Projects , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Software-based MRI/TRUS fusion biopsy depends on the coordination of several steps, and inter-examiner differences could influence the results. The aim of this bicentric prospective study was to compare the detection rates of MRI/TRUS fusion targeted biopsy (TG) and systematic biopsy (SB), and the detection rates of examiners with different levels of previous experience in prostate biopsy. METHODS: A total of 419 patients underwent MRI based on a suspicion of prostate cancer with elevated PSA levels. MRI was positive in 395 patients (221 in the first biopsy group [FB] and 174 in the repeated biopsy group [RB]). A subsequent TG, followed by a SB, was performed on these patients by four different examiners. RESULTS: In the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer, a significant difference was found for TG+SB against SB in the RB group (35.1% vs. 25.3%, P=0.047). In the detection of clinically insignificant prostate cancer, the SB had a significantly higher detection rate than TG in both subgroups (FB: 11.9% vs. 4.7%, P=0.008; RB: 13.8% vs. 6.9%, P=0.034). A significant difference was found between the four examiners in the FB for TG (P=0.028), SB (P=0.036), and TG+SB (P=0.017). CONCLUSION: MRI/TRUS TG in combination with SB had significantly higher detection rates than SB in the RB group only. Differences in detection rates between examiners were dependent on the level of previous experience with TRUS guided biopsy.
Subject(s)
Digital Rectal Examination/standards , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/physiopathology , Ultrasonography, Interventional/standards , Aged , Digital Rectal Examination/methods , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Ultrasonography, Interventional/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We update the prior standard operating procedure for magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate, and summarize the available data about the technique and clinical use for the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. This update includes practical recommendations on the use of magnetic resonance imaging for screening, diagnosis, staging, treatment and surveillance of prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A panel of clinicians from the American Urological Association and Society of Abdominal Radiology with expertise in the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer evaluated the current published literature on the use and technique of magnetic resonance imaging for this disease. When adequate studies were available for analysis, recommendations were made on the basis of data and when adequate studies were not available, recommendations were made on the basis of expert consensus. RESULTS: Prostate magnetic resonance imaging should be performed according to technical specifications and standards, and interpreted according to standard reporting. Data support its use in men with a previous negative biopsy and ongoing concerns about increased risk of prostate cancer. Sufficient data now exist to support the recommendation of magnetic resonance imaging before prostate biopsy in all men who have no history of biopsy. Currently, the evidence is insufficient to recommend magnetic resonance imaging for screening, staging or surveillance of prostate cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Use of prostate magnetic resonance imaging in the risk stratification, diagnosis and treatment pathway of men with prostate cancer is expanding. When quality prostate imaging is obtained, current evidence now supports its use in men at risk of harboring prostate cancer and who have not undergone a previous biopsy, as well as in men with an increasing prostate specific antigen following an initial negative standard prostate biopsy procedure.
Subject(s)
Mass Screening/standards , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Kallikreins/blood , Male , Mass Screening/instrumentation , Mass Screening/methods , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/instrumentation , Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Prostate/pathology , Prostate-Specific Antigen/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/blood , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Radiation Oncology/methods , Radiation Oncology/standards , Risk Assessment/methods , Risk Assessment/standardsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the number of needle cores combined with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) findings needed to diagnose all clinically significant cases of prostate cancer (csPCa) in men subject to transperineal saturation biopsy (SPBx; 30 cores). METHODS: From January 2016 to June 2019, 875 men (median age 63 years) underwent repeat SPBx (median 30 cores) for the suspicion of cancer. All of the patients underwent for the first time 3.0 Tesla pelvic mpMRI before SPBx, and the lesions with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System category ≥3 underwent additional transperineal-targeted fusion prostate biopsies (TPBx). RESULTS: StageT1c PCa was found in 306/875 (34.5%), and 222/306 (72.5%) of them were classified as csPCa. SPBx missed 2/222 (1%) csPCa with International Society of Urologic Pathology Grade Group (GG) 3. TBPx missed 33/222 (14.9%) csPCa (21 vs 12 cases were GG1 vs GG3). The initial 20 needle SPBx cores obtained from the peripheric (16 cores) and anterior gland (4 cores) diagnosed all of the 222 (100%) csPCa only missing 84/129 (65.1%) indolent PCa thus presenting diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity equal to 83.1%, 100%, and 65.1%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In men subject to mpMRI and/or TPBx, a maximum of 20 systematic transperineal needle cores detected all cases of csPCa and minimized the diagnosis of indolent cancers.
Subject(s)
Image-Guided Biopsy , Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Interventional/methods , Prostate , Prostatic Neoplasms , Aged , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/methods , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle/standards , Diagnostic Errors/prevention & control , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasm Staging , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care , Prostate/diagnostic imaging , Prostate/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathologyABSTRACT
White light colonoscopy is widely used to detect colorectal polyps, but flat and depressed lesions are often missed. Here, we report a molecular imaging strategy to potentially improve diagnostic performance by developing a fluorescently-labeled peptide specific for cMet. This 7mer is conjugated to Cy5.5, a near-infrared (NIR) cyanine dye. Specific binding to cMet was confirmed by cell staining, knockdown, and competition assays. The probe showed high binding affinity (kd = 57 nM) and fast onset (k = 1.6 min) to support topical administration in vivo. A mouse model (CPC;Apc) that develops spontaneous adenomas that overexpress cMet was used to demonstrate feasibility for real time in vivo imaging. This targeting ligand showed significantly higher target-to-background (T/B) ratio for polypoid and non-polypoid lesions by comparison with a scrambled control peptide. Immunofluorescence staining on human colon specimens show significantly greater binding to tubular and sessile serrated adenomas versus hyperplastic polyps and normal mucosa. These results demonstrate a peptide specific for cMet that is promising for endoscopic detection of pre-malignant lesions and guiding of tissue biopsy.
Subject(s)
Adenoma/diagnostic imaging , Colonic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Colonoscopy/methods , Peptides/pharmacokinetics , Proto-Oncogene Proteins c-met/metabolism , Adenoma/pathology , Animals , Carbocyanines/chemistry , Cell Line, Tumor , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Colonoscopy/standards , Fluorescent Dyes , HT29 Cells , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Infrared Rays , Intestinal Mucosa/metabolism , Ligands , Mice , NIH 3T3 Cells , Peptides/chemistry , Protein Binding , Sensitivity and SpecificityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and safety of PET/CT-guided percutaneous core bone biopsy and to compare the PET/CT-guided method to conventional CT-guided percutaneous core biopsies to diagnose Chinese patients with bone tumors and tumor-like lesions. METHODS: Data for 97 patients with bone tumors and tumor-like lesions diagnosed by percutaneous core bone biopsy from February 2013 to November 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. The study included 42 cases in the PET/CT group and 55 cases in the CT alone group. The diagnostic performance, cost and complications associated with the intervention were compared between the two groups. All patients were eventually confirmed to have bone tumors and tumor-like lesions according to surgical pathology findings. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in patient characteristics (P > 0.05). For the patients in the PET/CT group, the overall diagnostic yield of the initial biopsies and the diagnostic accuracy derived from the surgically proven cases were both 97.62%, which was significantly higher than the values in the CT group during the same period (P < 0.05). No major biopsy-related complications (e.g., serious bleeding or tumor dissemination) occurred before, during, or after the intervention. Therefore, no significant difference was observed between the two groups with regard to the complication rate (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Compared with CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy, PET/CT-guided percutaneous bone biopsy is an effective and safe alternative with high diagnostic performance in the evaluation of hypermetabolic bone lesions to diagnose bone tumors and tumor-like lesions.
Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Image-Guided Biopsy/methods , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Female , Humans , Image-Guided Biopsy/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to summarize the most current literature regarding the most important aspects to consider when developing a center of excellence for prostate imaging and biopsy. RECENT FINDINGS: Multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI) has changed the way we diagnose and treat prostate cancer. This imaging modality allows for more precise identification of areas suspicious in terms of harboring prostate cancer, enabling performance of targeted mp-MRI-guided biopsies that have been demonstrated to yield superior cancer detection rates. Centers worldwide are increasingly adopting this technology. However, obtaining results comparable with those findings published in the literature can be challenging. The imaging and biopsy process entails the need for a multidisciplinary team including a dedicated radiologist, urologist, and pathologist. Adequate mp-MRI interpretation for accurate lesion identification, acquaintance with the biopsy technique selected, and precise characterization of Gleason Score/Grade Groupings are equal determinants of accurate biopsy results. Furthermore, all specialists are required to attain appropriate learning curves to ensure optimal results. In this review, we characterize crucial aspects to consider when developing a center of excellence for prostate imaging and biopsy as well as insights regarding how to implement them.