ABSTRACT
We modeled the impact of local vaccine mandates on the spread of vaccine-preventable infectious diseases, which in the absence of vaccines will mainly affect children. Examples of such diseases are measles, rubella, mumps, and pertussis. To model the spread of the pathogen, we used a stochastic SIR (susceptible, infectious, recovered) model with two levels of mixing in a closed population, often referred to as the household model. In this model, individuals make local contacts within a specific small subgroup of the population (e.g., within a household or a school class), while they also make global contacts with random people in the population at a much lower rate than the rate of local contacts. We considered what would happen if schools were given freedom to impose vaccine mandates on all of their pupils, except for the pupils that were exempt from vaccination because of medical reasons. We investigated first how such a mandate affected the probability of an outbreak of a disease. Furthermore, we focused on the probability that a pupil that was medically exempt from vaccination, would get infected during an outbreak. We showed that if the population vaccine coverage was close to the herd-immunity level, then both probabilities may increase if local vaccine mandates were implemented. This was caused by unvaccinated pupils possibly being moved to schools without mandates.
Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases , Disease Outbreaks , Schools , Vaccination , Humans , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Child , Communicable Diseases/epidemiology , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/epidemiology , Stochastic Processes , Immunity, Herd , Vaccines/administration & dosage , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/epidemiology , Probability , Computer Simulation , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/epidemiology , Mandatory Programs , Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Disease Control/legislation & jurisprudence , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/epidemiology , Mandatory VaccinationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: In June 2022, French health authorities issued a universal recommendation for routine administration and reimbursement of rotavirus vaccines in infants. Given this recent recommendation by French health authorities, we sought to understand the public health impact of a universal rotavirus vaccination strategy compared with no vaccination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A deterministic, age-structured, nonlinear dynamic transmission model, accounting for herd immunity, was developed. We considered 3 vaccination coverage scenarios: high (95%), medium (75%) and low (55%). Model parameter values were based on published modeling and epidemiological literature. Model outcomes included rotavirus gastroenteritis (RVGE) cases and healthcare resource utilization due to RVGE (hospitalizations, general practitioner or emergency department visits), as well as the number needed to vaccinate to prevent 1 RVGE case (mild or severe) and 1 RVGE-related hospitalization. Model calibration and analyses were conducted using Mathematica 11.3. RESULTS: Over 5 years following implementation, RVGE cases for children under 5 years are estimated to be reduced by 84% under a high vaccination coverage scenario, by 72% under a medium vaccination coverage scenario and by 47% under a low vaccination coverage scenario. Across all scenarios, the number needed to vaccinate to avert 1 RVGE case and hospitalization varied between 1.86-2.04 and 24.15-27.44, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Rotavirus vaccination with high vaccination coverage in France is expected to substantially reduce the number of RVGE cases and associated healthcare resource utilization.
Subject(s)
Gastroenteritis , Immunization Programs , Public Health , Rotavirus Infections , Rotavirus Vaccines , Humans , Rotavirus Infections/prevention & control , Rotavirus Infections/epidemiology , Rotavirus Vaccines/administration & dosage , Rotavirus Vaccines/immunology , France/epidemiology , Infant , Child, Preschool , Immunization Programs/statistics & numerical data , Gastroenteritis/prevention & control , Gastroenteritis/virology , Gastroenteritis/epidemiology , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Rotavirus/immunology , Infant, Newborn , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
Vaccines should be regularly administered and their efficiency controlled, before and after intestinal transplantation. The household and health care providers should also be immunized, to further prevent transmission. Universal vaccination providing " herd immunity" should be enforced. Recommendations are given about timing, indications, and contraindications of each individual vaccine, before and after transplantation.
Subject(s)
Intestine, Small , Vaccination , Humans , Intestine, Small/transplantation , Intestine, Small/immunology , Vaccines , Immunocompromised Host , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
Mumps is a vaccine-preventable disease with high contagious capability. Its incidence declined rapidly since one dose of mumps vaccine was introduced into Expanded Program of Immunization (EPI) in 2008 in China. Nonetheless, the outbreaks of mumps remain frequent in China. Here we aim to assess herd immunity level followed by one-dose mumps ingredient vaccine and to elucidate the genetic characteristics of mumps viruses circulating in the post vaccine era in Jiangsu province of China. The complete sequences of mumps virus small hydrophobic(SH) gene were amplified and sequenced; coalescent-based Bayesian method was used to perform phylogenetic analysis with BEAST 1.84 software. Commercially available indirect enzyme-linked immune-sorbent IgG assay was used for the quantitative detection of IgG antibody against mumps virus. Our results show that genotype F was the predominant mumps viruses and belonged to indigenous spread, and most of Jiangsu sequences clustered together and formed a monophyly. The prevalence of mumps reached a peak in 2012 and subsequently declined, which presented an obvious different trajectory with virus circulating in other regions of China. The gene diversity of viruses circulating in Jiangsu province was far less than those in China. The antibody prevalence reached 70.42% in the general population during 2018 to 2020. The rising trend of antibody level was also observed. Although mumps antibody prevalence does not reach expected level, mumps virus faces higher pressure in Jiangsu province than the whole of China. To reduce further the prevalence of mumps viruses, two doses of mumps vaccine should be involved into EPI.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral , Mumps Vaccine , Mumps virus , Mumps , Phylogeny , Mumps virus/genetics , Mumps virus/immunology , Mumps virus/classification , Humans , China/epidemiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/virology , Mumps/immunology , Mumps/prevention & control , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps Vaccine/immunology , Adult , Young Adult , Female , Male , Genotype , Adolescent , Child , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Middle Aged , Child, Preschool , Immunity, Herd , Genetic Variation , Viral ProteinsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this work is to characterize scenarios under which it may be in a donor country's own public health interests to donate vaccine doses to another country before its own population has been fully vaccinated. In these scenarios, vaccinating other countries can delay the evolution of new variants of the virus, decrease total deaths, and, in some cases, decrease deaths in the donor countries. STUDY DESIGN: We simulate the effects of different vaccine donation policies using an epidemiological model employing COVID-19 transmission parameters. METHODS: We use the epidemiological model of Holleran et al. that incorporates virus mutation to simulate epidemic progression and estimate numbers of deaths arising from several vaccine allocation policies (donor-first, non-donor-first, and vaccine sharing) across a number of scenarios. We analyze the results in light of herd immunity limits derived in Holleran et al. RESULTS: We identify realistic scenarios under which a donor country prefers to donate vaccines before distributing them locally in order to minimize local deaths during a pandemic. We demonstrate that a non-donor-first vaccination policy can delay, sometimes dramatically, the emergence of more-contagious variants. Even more surprising, donating all vaccines is sometimes better for the donor country than a sharing policy in which half of the vaccines are donated, and half are retained because of the impact donation can have on delaying the emergence of a more contagious virus. Non-donor-first vaccine allocation is optimal in scenarios in which the local health impact of the vaccine is limited or when delaying the emergence of a variant is especially valuable. CONCLUSION: In all cases, we find that vaccine distribution is not a zero-sum game between donor and non-donor countries, illustrating the general moral reasons to donate vaccines. In some cases, donor nations can also realize local health benefits from donating vaccines. The insights yielded by this framework can be used to guide equitable vaccine distribution in future pandemics.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 Vaccines , COVID-19 , Health Policy , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19 Vaccines/administration & dosage , SARS-CoV-2 , Pandemics/prevention & control , Epidemiological Models , Immunity, Herd , Vaccination/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
We propose a new approach to estimate the vaccination rates required to achieve herd immunity against SARS-COV2 virus at a city level. Based on information obtained from the Israeli Ministry of Health, we estimate two separate quadratic models, one for each dose of the BNT162b2 mRNA Pfizer vaccine. The dependent variable is the scope of morbidity, expressed as the number of cases per 10,000 persons. The independent variables are the first and second vaccination rates and their squares. The outcomes corroborate that herd immunity is achieved in the case that 71 percent of the urban population is vaccinated, and the minimum anticipated scope of morbidity is approximately 5 active COVID-19 cases per 10,000 persons, compared to 53-67 cases per 10,000 persons for zero vaccination rate. Findings emphasize the importance of vaccinations and demonstrate that urban herd immunity may be defined as a situation in which people continue to interact, yet the COVID-19 spread is contained. This, in turn, might prevent the need for lockdowns or other limitations at the city level.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunity, Herd , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Israel/epidemiology , Vaccination , Cities , COVID-19 Vaccines/immunology , Urban Population , BNT162 Vaccine/immunologyABSTRACT
Many countries have experienced multiple waves of infection during the COVID-19 pandemic. We propose a novel but parsimonious extension of the SIR model, a CSIR model, that can endogenously generate waves. In the model, cautious individuals take appropriate prevention measures against the virus and are not exposed to infection risk. Incautious individuals do not take any measures and are susceptible to the risk of infection. Depending on the size of incautious and susceptible population, some cautious people lower their guard and become incautious-thus susceptible to the virus. When the virus spreads sufficiently, the population reaches "temporary" herd immunity and infection subsides thereafter. Yet, the inflow from the cautious to the susceptible eventually expands the susceptible population and leads to the next wave. We also show that the CSIR model is isomorphic to the SIR model with time-varying parameters.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , Disease Susceptibility/epidemiology , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
In the current paper we analyse an extended SIRS epidemic model in which immunity at the individual level wanes gradually at exponential rate, but where the waning rate may differ between individuals, for instance as an effect of differences in immune systems. The model also includes vaccination schemes aimed to reach and maintain herd immunity. We consider both the informed situation where the individual waning parameters are known, thus allowing selection of vaccinees being based on both time since last vaccination as well as on the individual waning rate, and the more likely uninformed situation where individual waning parameters are unobserved, thus only allowing vaccination schemes to depend on time since last vaccination. The optimal vaccination policies for both the informed and uniformed heterogeneous situation are derived and compared with the homogeneous waning model (meaning all individuals have the same immunity waning rate), as well as to the classic SIRS model where immunity at the individual level drops from complete immunity to complete susceptibility in one leap. It is shown that the classic SIRS model requires least vaccines, followed by the SIRS with homogeneous gradual waning, followed by the informed situation for the model with heterogeneous gradual waning. The situation requiring most vaccines for herd immunity is the most likely scenario, that immunity wanes gradually with unobserved individual heterogeneity. For parameter values chosen to mimic COVID-19 and assuming perfect initial immunity and cumulative immunity of 12 months, the classic homogeneous SIRS epidemic suggests that vaccinating individuals every 15 months is sufficient to reach and maintain herd immunity, whereas the uninformed case for exponential waning with rate heterogeneity corresponding to a coefficient of variation being 0.5, requires that individuals instead need to be vaccinated every 4.4 months.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Epidemics , Immunity, Herd , Vaccination , Humans , Immunity, Herd/immunology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Rubella remains a public health challenge in Japan, impeding the attainment of herd immunity. Despite vaccination efforts since 1976, persistent outbreaks reveal a susceptibility gap in male adults born before 1995. Seroepidemiological surveys are pivotal in evaluating population immunity and identifying at-risk groups. METHODS: This study aims to pinpoint high-risk areas for potential rubella outbreaks in Japan by merging seroepidemiological data from 2020 with population census information. Various data sources, including spatial demographic data, reported rubella and congenital rubella syndrome (CRS) cases, and traveler lodging statistics, were employed. Geospatial information for Japan's 230,300 small geographic areas was analyzed, and HI (hemagglutination inhibition) titers were examined by age and sex. Seroconversion was defined as an HI titer ≥ 1:32 or 1:16, indicating protective immunity. Geospatial maps illustrated the distribution of susceptible individuals per square kilometer, emphasizing high-risk urban areas like Tokyo and Osaka. Demographic shifts in the working-age population were assessed. RESULTS: Susceptible individuals cluster in densely populated urban centers, persisting despite demographic changes. The study highlights areas at risk of increased susceptibility, particularly with an HI titer cut-off of 1:16. Foreign travelers pose potential rubella importation risks as travel volume to Japan rises. To prevent epidemics and congenital rubella syndrome burden, achieving and sustaining herd immunity in high-risk areas is crucial. CONCLUSIONS: This study offers a comprehensive assessment of vulnerability in densely populated Japanese regions. Integrating population statistics with seroepidemiological data enhances our understanding of population immunity, guiding resource allocation for supplementary vaccination planning. To avert rubella epidemics, high-risk locations must bolster indirect protection through herd immunity, ultimately preventing congenital rubella syndrome.
Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Rubella , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Male , Adult , Female , Young Adult , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Middle Aged , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Infant , Aged , Risk Assessment , Disease Susceptibility , Immunity, Herd , Infant, Newborn , Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests , Spatial Analysis , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: "Herd immunity" became a contested term during the COVID-19 pandemic. Although the term "herd immunity" is often used to refer to thresholds at which some diseases can be eliminated (e.g., due to mass vaccination), the term has multiple referents. Different concepts of herd immunity have been relevant throughout the history of immunology and infectious disease epidemiology. For some diseases, herd immunity plays a role in the development of an endemic equilibrium, rather than elimination via threshold effects. METHODS: We reviewed academic literature from 1920 to 2022, using historical and philosophical analysis to identify and develop relevant concepts of herd immunity. RESULTS: This paper analyses the ambiguity surrounding the concept of herd immunity during the pandemic. We argue for the need to recapture a long-standing interpretation of this concept as one of the factors that leads to a dynamic endemic equilibrium between a host population and a mutating respiratory pathogen. CONCLUSIONS: Informed by the history of infectious disease epidemiology, we argue that understanding the concept in this way will help us manage both SARS-CoV-2 and hundreds of other seasonal respiratory pathogens with which we live but which have been disrupted due to sustained public health measures/non-pharmaceutical interventions targeting SARS-CoV-2.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Endemic Diseases , Immunity, Herd , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/immunology , COVID-19/prevention & control , History, 20th Century , Health Policy , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , Pandemics , History, 21st Century , Public HealthABSTRACT
This paper focuses on the economics of vaccination and, more specifically, analyzes the vaccination decision of individuals using a game-theoretic model combined with an epidemiological SIR model that reproduces the infection dynamics of a generic disease. We characterize the equilibrium individual vaccination rate, and we show that it is below the rate compatible with herd immunity due to the existence of externalities that individuals do not internalize when they decide on vaccination. In addition, we analyze three public policies consisting of informational campaigns to reduce the disutility of vaccination, monetary payments to vaccinated individuals and measures to increase the disutility of non-vaccination. If the public authority uses only one type of policy, herd immunity is not necessarily achieved unless monetary incentives are used. When the public authority is not limited to use only one policy, we find that the optimal public policy should consist only of informational campaigns if they are sufficiently effective, or a combination of informational campaigns and monetary incentives otherwise. Surprisingly, the requirement of vaccine passports or other restrictions on the non-vaccinated are not desirable.
Subject(s)
Motivation , Vaccination , Humans , Vaccination/economics , Public Policy , Game Theory , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic propelled immunology into global news and social media, resulting in the potential for misinterpreting and misusing complex scientific concepts. Objective: To study the extent to which immunology is discussed in news articles and YouTube videos in English and Italian, and if related scientific concepts are used to support specific political or ideological narratives in the context of COVID-19. Methods: In English and Italian we searched the period 11/09/2019 to 11/09/2022 on YouTube, using the software Mozdeh, for videos mentioning COVID-19 and one of nine immunological concepts: antibody-dependent enhancement, anergy, cytokine storm, herd immunity, hygiene hypothesis, immunity debt, original antigenic sin, oxidative stress and viral interference. We repeated this using MediaCloud for news articles.Four samples of 200 articles/videos were obtained from the randomised data gathered and analysed for mentions of concepts, stance on vaccines, masks, lockdown, social distancing, and political signifiers. Results: Vaccine-negative information was higher in videos than news (8-fold in English, 6-fold in Italian) and higher in Italian than English (4-fold in news, 3-fold in videos). We also observed the existence of information bubbles, where a negative stance towards one intervention was associated with a negative stance to other linked ideas. Some immunological concepts (immunity debt, viral interference, anergy and original antigenic sin) were associated with anti-vaccine or anti-NPI (non-pharmacological intervention) views. Videos in English mentioned politics more frequently than those in Italian and, in all media and languages, politics was more frequently mentioned in anti-guidelines and anti-vaccine media by a factor of 3 in video and of 3-5 in news. Conclusion: There is evidence that some immunological concepts are used to provide credibility to specific narratives and ideological views. The existence of information bubbles supports the concept of the "rabbit hole" effect, where interest in unconventional views/media leads to ever more extreme algorithmic recommendations.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Social Media , Humans , Communicable Disease Control , Pandemics , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, changes in policy, shifts in behavior, and the emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants spurred multiple waves of transmission. Accurate assessments of the changing risks were vital for ensuring adequate healthcare capacity, designing mitigation strategies, and communicating effectively with the public. Here, we introduce a model of COVID-19 transmission and vaccination that provided rapid and reliable projections as the BA.1, BA.4 and BA.5 variants emerged and spread across the US. For example, our three-week ahead national projection of the early 2021 peak in COVID-19 hospitalizations was only one day later and 11.6-13.3% higher than the actual peak, while our projected peak in mortality was two days earlier and 0.22-4.7% higher than reported. We track population-level immunity from prior infections and vaccination in terms of the percent reduction in overall susceptibility relative to a completely naive population. As of October 1, 2022, we estimate that the US population had a 36.52% reduction in overall susceptibility to the BA.4/BA.5 variants, with 61.8%, 15.06%, and 23.54% of immunity attributable to infections, primary series vaccination, and booster vaccination, respectively. We retrospectively projected the potential impact of expanding booster coverage starting on July 15, 2022, and found that a five-fold increase in weekly boosting rates would have resulted in 70% of people over 65 vaccinated by Oct 10, 2022 and averted 25,000 (95% CI: 14,400-35,700) deaths during the BA.4/BA.5 surge. Our model provides coherent variables for tracking population-level immunity in the increasingly complex landscape of variants and vaccines and enables robust simulations of plausible scenarios for the emergence and mitigation of novel COVID variants.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemics , Humans , Retrospective Studies , COVID-19/epidemiology , Hospitalization , Immunity, HerdABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Promoting vaccine uptake is challenging. This research aimed to experimentally test the effect of communication strategies on influenza vaccine uptake intention. We hypothesized that the effect of descriptive norm level (10%-50%-90% of others vaccinated) on intention would vary according to whether the benefits are focused on the individual (self-interest motives) or others (herd-immunity motives). In particular, we predicted that low and high levels of norms would be detrimental in the herd-immunity condition (inverted-U pattern). In contrast, intention should increase linearly with the norm in the self-interest condition. METHOD: A representative sample of the Swiss population answered a survey containing vignettes manipulating norms (within-subjects variable) and motives (between-subjects variable, randomized). Their intention to receive a flu shot was measured for each situation. RESULTS: As expected, a significant simple quadratic effect of norm was obtained in the herd-immunity condition. No linear effect was found in the self-interest condition. A main effect of motives was found: The intention was higher in the herd-immunity condition than in the self-interest condition. Sensitivity analysis showed that our results are robust, except for the simple quadratic effect in the herd-immunity condition. CONCLUSIONS: Herd-immunity motive is more motivating to induce intention to vaccinate against influenza. The effect of norms appears to depend on the motive, and average levels of norms seem to be more motivating than very low and very high levels. The way vaccination is presented can influence adoption rates, and this should be considered when vaccination rates are communicated in the media. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Subject(s)
Influenza Vaccines , Influenza, Human , Humans , Intention , Immunity, Herd , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Motivation , VaccinationABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Ensuring vaccination coverage reaches established herd immunity thresholds (HITs) is the cornerstone of any vaccination programme. Diverse migrant populations in European countries have been associated with cases of vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs) and outbreaks, yet it is not clear to what extent they are an under-immunized group. METHODS: We did a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize peer-reviewed published primary research reporting data on the immune status of migrants in EU/EEA countries, the UK and Switzerland, calculating their pooled immunity coverage for measles, mumps, rubella and diphtheria using random-effects models. We searched on Web of Science, Embase, Global Health and MEDLINE (1 January 2000 to 10 June 2022), with no language restrictions. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42018103666). FINDINGS: Of 1103 abstracts screened, 62 met eligibility criteria, of which 39 were included in the meta-analysis. The meta-analysis included 75 089 migrants, predominantly from outside Europe. Pooled immunity coverage among migrant populations was well below the recommended HIT for diphtheria (n = 7, 57.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): 43.1-71.7%] I2 = 99% vs HIT 83-86%), measles (n = 21, 83.7% [95% CI: 79.2-88.2] I2 = 99% vs HIT 93-95%) and mumps (n = 8, 67.1% [95% CI: 50.6-83.6] I2 = 99% vs HIT 88-93%) and midway for rubella (n = 29, 85.6% [95% CI: 83.1-88.1%] I2 = 99% vs HIT 83-94%), with high heterogeneity across studies. INTERPRETATION: Migrants in Europe are an under-immunized group for a range of important VPDs, with this study reinforcing the importance of engaging children, adolescents and adults in 'catch-up' vaccination initiatives on arrival for vaccines, doses and boosters they may have missed in their home countries. Co-designing strategies to strengthen catch-up vaccination across the life course in under-immunized groups is an important next step if we are to meet European and global targets for VPD elimination and control and ensure vaccine equity.
Subject(s)
Transients and Migrants , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases , Humans , Transients and Migrants/statistics & numerical data , Europe , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/prevention & control , Vaccine-Preventable Diseases/immunology , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/immunology , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/immunology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Immunity, Herd , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/immunology , Measles/epidemiology , Diphtheria/prevention & control , Diphtheria/immunologyABSTRACT
Vaccine hesitancy or refusal has been one of the major obstacles to herd immunity against Covid-19 in high-income countries and one of the causes for the emergence of variants. The refusal of people who are eligible for vaccination to receive vaccination creates an ethical dilemma between the duty of healthcare professionals (HCPs) to care for patients and their right to be taken care of. This paper argues for an extended social contract between patients and society wherein vaccination against Covid-19 is conceived as essential for the protection of the right of healthcare providers to be taken care of. Thus, a duty of care is only valid when those who can receive vaccination actually receive it. Whenever that is not the case, the continuing functioning of HCPs can only be perceived as supererogatory and not obligatory.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , Health Personnel , Immunity, Herd , VaccinationABSTRACT
Contributions to COVID-19 vaccination programmes promise valuable collective goods. They can support public and individual health by creating herd immunity and taking the pressure off overwhelmed public health services; support freedom of movement by enabling governments to remove restrictive lockdown policies; and improve economic and social well-being by allowing businesses, schools, and other essential public services to re-open. The vaccinated can contribute to the production of these goods. The unvaccinated, who benefit from, but who do not contribute to these goods can be morally criticised as free-riders. In this paper defends the claim that in the case of COVID-19, the unvaccinated are unfair free-riders. I defend the claim against two objections. First, that they are not unfair free-riders because they lack the subjective attitudes and intentions of free-riders; second, that although the unvaccinated may be free-riders, their free-riding is not unfair.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19 Vaccines , Communicable Disease Control , Immunity, Herd , PolicyABSTRACT
The clinical implications of COVID-19 have changed since SARS-CoV-2 first emerged in humans. The current high levels of population immunity, due to prior infection and/or vaccination, have been associated with a vastly decreased overall risk of severe disease. Some people, particularly those with immunocompromising conditions, remain at risk for severe outcomes. Through the course of the pandemic, variants with somewhat different symptom profiles from the original SARS-CoV-2 virus have emerged. The management of COVID-19 has also changed since 2020, with the increasing availability of evidence-based treatments in two main classes: antivirals and immunomodulators. Selecting the appropriate treatment(s) for patients with COVID-19 requires a deep understanding of the evidence and an awareness of the limitations of applying data that have been largely based on immune-naive populations to patients today who most likely have vaccine-derived and/or infection-derived immunity. In this Review, we provide a summary of the clinical manifestations and approaches to caring for adult patients with COVID-19 in the era of vaccine availability and the dominance of the Omicron subvariants, with a focus on the management of COVID-19 in different patient groups, including immunocompromised, pregnant, vaccinated and unvaccinated patients.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Vaccines , Adult , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Immunity, Herd , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination , Disease ProgressionABSTRACT
Public health emergencies are fraught by epistemic uncertainty, which raises policy issues of how to handle that uncertainty and devise sustainable public health responses. Among such responses, a herd immunity policy might be an option. Particularly before the development of vaccines, the current COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the polarized nature of the political debate concerning the ethical feasibility of herd immunity strategies. This article provides a conceptual framework tailored to uncover the ethical rationale behind such strategies. Clarity on this issue is important in order to facilitate the terms of the political debate when tackling future health emergencies.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Immunity, Herd , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2/immunology , COVID-19 Vaccines , Pandemics/ethics , Public Health/ethicsABSTRACT
Background: The prevailing unwillingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination among the eligible population has been a serious setback in Nigeria's bid to reach herd immunity against the pandemic. Objective: We assessed the impact of a multidisciplinary health communication intervention (MHCI) on willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination among eligible unvaccinated community dwellers (EUCD) in Nsukka Urban, Enugu State, Nigeria. Methods: Through a quasi-experiment that adopted a pre-test, post-test, non-control group design, we studied a total of 85 eligible unvaccinated adults. A researcher-designed "Willingness to Accept COVID-19 Vaccination Questionnaire" was the instrument used for data collection. The data gathered was analysed by means of Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 23.0. Specifically, descriptive and inferential statistics were used to test the formulated research questions and the hypothesis at 0.05 level of significance. Results: We found that the mean scores of willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination increased significantly after the treatment. There was no significant interaction effect of gender, level of education, and age on the mean of willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination scores of EUCD after MHCI. Conclusion: The study established that MHCI is impactful in bolstering the willingness to accept COVID-19 vaccination. The Nigerian government should adopt and implement this intervention in schools, communities, and other institutions in order to attain herd immunity in Nigeria.