Current approaches and future directions for addressing ethics in infant and early childhood mental health.

In this paper, we consider whether the field of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) needs its own code of ethics. We begin by describing unique features of infant and early childhood mental health (IECMH) and the diverse strategies that the field has developed to address complex clinical dilemmas, among them workforce development, clinical supports, policy statements, and statements of ethical values. Because of the field's interdisciplinary nature, we also consider how various contributing professions and organizations address ethical issues. While these are important resources that can inform ethical decision-making, we identify some of the limitations of the current approaches. We argue that it is time for the field of IECMH to take an intentional, systematic approach to directly address the complex and unique ethical dilemmas faced by infant and early childhood mental health practitioners, and we grapple with some of the challenges developing such a code might entail. We suggest several avenues for better understanding the scope of ethical issues and ethical decision-making processes in IECMH that could be used to support developing an ethics code that is responsive to the unique and challenging world of infant and early childhood mental health.

En este estudio, consideramos si el campo de la salud mental infantil y la temprana niñez (IECMH) necesita su propio código de ética. Comenzamos describiendo características distintivas de la salud mental infantil y la temprana niñez (IECMH) y la diversidad de estrategias que el campo ha desarrollado para tratar los complejos dilemas clínicos, incluyendo el desarrollo de la fuerza laboral, los apoyos clínicos, las afirmaciones de las políticas, así como las afirmaciones de valores éticos. Debido a la naturaleza interdisciplinaria del campo, también consideramos cómo varias profesiones y organizaciones que aportan contribuciones tratan los asuntos éticos. Aunque estos son recursos importantes que pueden servir de apoyo para la toma de decisiones éticas, identificamos algunas de las limitaciones de los acercamientos en el presente. Sostenemos que es el momento de que el campo de IECMH asuma un acercamiento intencional, sistemático que directamente trate los complejos y distintivos dilemas que enfrentan quienes ejercen en la práctica profesional de la salud mental infantil y la temprana niñez, y nos enfrentemos con algunos de los retos que el desarrollo de tal código pudiera significar. Sugerimos varias maneras de comprender mejor el ámbito de los asuntos éticos y los procesos éticos de toma de decisiones en IECMH con el fin de apoyar un código de ética que tome en cuenta el distintivo y desafiante mundo de la salud mental infantil y la temprana niñez.

Dans cet article nous réfléchissons et étudions si le domaine de la santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance (IECMH) a besoin de son propre code d'éthique. Nous commençons par la description des traits uniques de la santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance (IECMH) et de la diversité de stratégies que notre domaine a développées afin de faire face à des dilemmes cliniques complexes, y compris pour ce qui concerne la formation du personnel, les soutiens cliniques, les déclarations de principes, et les déclarations de valeurs éthiques. Du fait de la nature pluridisciplinaire de notre domaine, nous évoquons également la manière dont différentes professions et différentes organisations qui contribuent à notre domaine abordent les problèmes éthiques. Sachant que ce sont là des ressources importantes qui peuvent informer nos décisions éthiques, nous identifions certaines des limitations des approches actuelles. Nous faisons valoir qu'il est temps que le domaine de l'IECMH aborde intentionnellement et systématiquement les dilemmes éthiques complexes et uniques auxquels font face les praticiens de la santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance, et nous nous attaquons à certains des défis qu'un tel code peut présenter. Nous suggérons plusieurs directions afin de mieux comprendre l'étendue des questions éthiques et des processus de prises de décision éthiques au sein de l'IECMH de façon à soutenir un code éthique qui est sensible au monde unique de la santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance ainsi qu'aux défis auxquels il fait face.

Introduction to special section doing the "right" thing: Ethical issues in infant and early childhood mental health.

Introducción a la Sección Especial: Hacer lo 'correcto:' Asuntos éticos en la salud mental infantil y en la temprana niñez ética, salud mental infantil y en la temprana niñez, código de ética.

Introduction à la section spéciale: Faire ce qui est 'juste': questions éthiques en santé mentale du nourrisson et de la petite enfance.

Did Bioethics Matter? A History of Autonomy, Consent, and Intersex Genital Surgery.

This article argues that the rise of bioethics in the post-WWII era and the emergence of the legal doctrine of informed consent in the late 1950s should have had a greater impact on patients with intersex traits (atypical sex development) than they did, given their emphasis on respect for autonomy and beneficence toward patients. Instead, these progressive trends collided with a turn in intersex management toward infants, who were unable to provide autonomous consent about their medical care. Patient autonomy took a back seat as parents heeded physicians' advice in an environment even more hierarchical than we know today. Intersex care of both infants and adults continues to need improvement. It remains an open question whether the abstract ideals of bioethics-respect, patient autonomy, and the requirement of informed consent-are alone adequate to secure that improvement, or whether legal actions (or the threat of litigation) or some other reforms will be required to effect such change.

Child Health Advice and Parental Obligation: The Case of Safe Sleep Recommendations and Sudden Unexpected Death in Infancy.

This article considers whether there is a parental obligation to comply with child health advice which is aimed at the general population and grounded in population-based research. Drawing upon the concept of role obligations, I argue that there is a temptation to use child health advice as a set of rules to which parents are morally obligated to comply, but that this temptation should be resisted. Using the case of Safe Sleep recommendations, designed to reduce the risk of sleep-related infant deaths, I present three reasons for doubting that parents are obligated, as a matter of course, to comply with child health advice. I suggest that, rather than compliance, deliberation about child health advice is obligatory, and that parents should have reasons for not following credible child health advice.