Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
1.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(1): 103221, 2022.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34536925

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to measure the incidence of complications in sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) patients treated with intra-tympanic steroid injection (ITSI) and compare hearing recovery rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 123 patients with unilateral SSNHL receiving ITSIs were included in this study. Post-ITSI complications were documented including otalgia, dysgeusia, vertigo (duration>1 h), and persistent eardrum perforation. The pain intensity was evaluated with visual analog scale (VAS). Hearing was measured before ITSI and at 1 month after the final ITSI. We compared our patients' hearing threshold between presence and absence of different complications. RESULTS: 47.2% patients experienced post-injection otalgia with the average VAS score 3.2 (range 2-6). Five (4.1%) and six (4.9%) patients exhibited vertigo and persistent eardrum perforations, respectively. The patients were divided into three groups based on the absence of complications and the presence of vertigo and eardrum perforation. The hearing threshold improvements did not differ significantly among the three groups (p = 0.366). Although the difference was not significant (p = 0.664), the proportion of patients experiencing post-ITSI vertigo who were on contemporaneous oral steroids was lower than the proportion of non-vertigo patients on such steroids. CONCLUSION: The incidences of otalgia, vertigo, and persistent eardrum perforation in SSNHL patients treated with ITSI were 47.2%, 4.1% and 4.9%, respectively. We found no association between concurrent oral steroid use and the incidence of post-ITSI eardrum perforation or vertigo. Although statistical significance was lacking, patients who did not take contemporaneous oral steroids may have a higher rate of prolonged post-ITSI vertigo.


Subject(s)
Ear Diseases/epidemiology , Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Hearing Loss, Sudden/drug therapy , Injection, Intratympanic/adverse effects , Steroids/administration & dosage , Steroids/adverse effects , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Ear Diseases/chemically induced , Earache/chemically induced , Female , Hearing/drug effects , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prognosis , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/chemically induced , Vertigo/chemically induced , Young Adult
2.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 166(2): 249-259, 2022 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34058895

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We investigated the incidence of tympanic membrane (TM) perforations induced after intratympanic steroid injection (ITSI) in patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss (SSNHL) through a systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE. REVIEW METHODS: Primary database searches were performed, and 1901 records were identified. After removal of 1802 articles through abstract screening, the remaining 99 full-text journals were assessed for eligibility to be included in the study. Fifty-eight studies that used either ventilation tubing (VT) or tympanocentesis (TC) for ITSI were selected for analysis. The subjects were divided into VT and TC groups. The rate of TM perforation after ITSI in 2 groups, sites of ITSI, needle gauge, and influence on residual hearing were investigated. RESULTS: The cohorts comprised patients who underwent VT (n = 257, 9.6%) and TC (n = 2415, 90.4%). The proportion of TM perforation after ITSI in each group was 0.073 (95% CI, 0.0469-0.1113) and 0.010 (95% CI, 0.0045-0.0215), respectively, which suggested that the VT group showed a significantly higher TM perforation rate than the TC group (P < .001). In the subgroup analyses, there was no significant difference in the odds ratio for the rate of TM perforation according to the injection site and needle gauge for TC. The proportion of surgical repair showed no significant difference between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: ITSI via VT may have a significantly higher risk of TM perforation than ITSI via TC, although those are relatively small overall. ITSI should be performed in the direction to minimize possible adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Injection, Intratympanic/adverse effects , Steroids/administration & dosage , Steroids/adverse effects , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/etiology , Humans , Risk Factors
3.
Laryngoscope ; 131(9): E2583-E2591, 2021 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34002883

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To investigate the risk of residual tympanic membrane (TM) perforation after intratympanic (IT) steroidal treatment administered via transtympanic injection compared with trans-tympanostomy tube (TyT). STUDY DESIGN: Case series, systematic review and meta analysis. METHODS: Data were retrieved from the medical files of an original cohort of all consecutive patients with sudden sensorineural hearing loss necessitating IT steroidal treatment in a tertiary medical center between January 1, 2016 and November 20, 2020. A systematic literature search of "MEDLINE" via "PubMed," "Embase," and "Web of Science" on comparable published cases was performed and meta-analysis was established. RESULTS: Eighteen studies describing 818 ears were included in the quantitative meta-analysis in addition to a local cohort of 140 ears. The proportion of residual TM perforation was 1.11% and 1.14% (95% confidence interval: 0.01%-3.27% and 0.028%-2.38%) in the TyT and trans-tympanic groups, respectively, suggesting no significant difference in residual TM perforation risk between these techniques. CONCLUSION: IT steroid therapy via trans-TyT is not associated with more residual perforations than IT steroid therapy via transtympanic injections. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E2583-E2591, 2021.


Subject(s)
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural/drug therapy , Injection, Intratympanic/adverse effects , Middle Ear Ventilation , Risk Assessment , Steroids/administration & dosage , Tympanic Membrane Perforation/etiology , Humans
4.
Article in Chinese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29873217

ABSTRACT

Objective:To investigate clinical characteristic and incidence of the adverse reaction to tympanic injection. The incidence rates of adverse reaction were also compared after improvement of anesthetic method and changed ratio of methylprednisolone. Method: A retrospective analysis of 712 cases (1 928 injections) of receiving injection in a medical center, to explore the overall and classified adverse reactions, as well as effects of age and gender and frequency on adverse reactions. According to the clinical characteristics of the early stage, the incidence of adverse reaction was observed after the application of anesthesia warming method and the change of methylprednisolone ratio. Result: Adverse reaction was found in 76 cases which included 62 cases of mild reactions, 4 cases of severe reactions and 10 cases of glucocorticoid-related reactions. Overall, 10.67% of patients had adverse reactions. There was no correlation between adverse reactions and age, gender or frequency. The incidence of vertigo was decreased after the application of improved anesthesia (P<0.05). The incidence of pain of joint methylprednisolone-and-lidocaine injection was lower than that of methylprednisolone injection (P<0.05). Conclusion: Intratympanic injection is a safe treatment, to some extent, although there is low incidence of adverse effects of it. At the same time, anesthetic warming method and changing the ratio of methylprednisolone can further reduce the incidence of vertigo and pain.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/adverse effects , Injection, Intratympanic/adverse effects , Methylprednisolone/adverse effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Humans , Injections , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
5.
Acta Otolaryngol ; 138(7): 648-651, 2018 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29513064

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The primary objective is to investigate the contribution of intratympanic steroids in the primary treatment of idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (ISSNHL). The secondary objective is to compare methylprednisolone (MP) and dexamethasone in terms of their effectiveness and injection-site pain. METHODS: Two hundred and four patients with ISSNHL, 144 patients underwent systemic steroid therapy (SST) alone and 60 patients underwent combined therapy (CT). The effectiveness of the treatment was assessed according to the Furuhashi criteria. Injection-site pain after the procedure was assessed at 5 and 60 min on a visual analog scale (VAS). RESULTS: Successful recovery was 55% in the CT group and 34% in the SST alone group (p = .004). Patients whose initial hearing level is severe, the success rate was statistically significantly higher with CT (p = .0001). Hearing improvement differed significantly between the MP and dexamethasone (p = .015). Injection-site pain at 5 min after the procedure, higher VAS scores were obtained with MP (p = .002). CONCLUSION: In the primary treatment of sudden hearing loss, in which the level of hearing loss is 70-89 dB HL, the addition of ITS to the treatment significantly increased the success rate. The pain occurring in the middle ear was high but tolerable in the first few minutes by MP.


Subject(s)
Dexamethasone/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Hearing Loss, Sudden/drug therapy , Methylprednisolone/administration & dosage , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Injection, Intratympanic/adverse effects , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...