Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 409
Filter
1.
J Perinat Med ; 50(3): 327-333, 2022 Mar 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34847313

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a complication of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and associated with increased mortality and morbidity. Our aim was to identify, in infants with BPD, the effect of PH on health-care utilisation and health related cost of care. METHODS: An electronic data recording system was used to identify infants ≤32 weeks of gestation who developed BPD. PH was classified as early (≤28 days after birth) or late (>28 days after birth). RESULTS: In the study period, 182 infants developed BPD; 22 (12.1%) developed late PH. Development of late PH was associated with a lower gestational age [24.6 (23.9-26.9) weeks, p=0.001] and a greater need for positive pressure ventilation on day 28 after birth (100%) compared to infants without late PH (51.9%) (odds ratio (OR) 19.5, 95% CI: 2.6-148), p<0.001. Late PH was associated with increased mortality (36.4%) compared those who did not develop late PH (1.9%) after adjusting for gestational age and ventilation duration (OR: 26.9, 95% CI: 3.8-189.4), p<0.001. In infants who survived to discharge, late PH development was associated with a prolonged duration of stay [147 (118-189) days] compared to the infants that did not develop late PH [109 (85-149) days] (p=0.03 after adjusting for gestational age). Infants who had late PH had a higher cost of stay compared to infants with BPD who did not develop late PH (median £113,494 vs. £78,677, p=0.016 after adjusting for gestational age). CONCLUSIONS: Development of late PH was associated with increased mortality, a prolonged duration of stay and higher healthcare cost.


Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/epidemiology , Birth Weight , Female , Hospital Costs , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/economics , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay , London/epidemiology , Male , Respiration, Artificial , Risk Factors
2.
Rio de Janeiro; s.n; 2022. 98 p. ilus, graf, tab.
Thesis in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-1552301

ABSTRACT

Em relação à demanda de recursos de saúde da atenção do RN e ao custo incorrido pelas famílias, esta dissertação se justifica por apresentar duas perspectivas de análise econômica: uma análise de custo direto sob a perspectiva do SUS provedor, através de uma estimativa de custos hospitalares do cuidado neonatal em uma UTIN selecionada em um hospital de referência nacional no município do Rio de Janeiro, e uma análise de custo indireto, sob a perspectiva das famílias, centrada no cuidador durante o período de internação nesta UTIN. O objeto desta pesquisa se centra na análise de custo do cuidado neonatal durante a internação do RN na UTIN, sob a perspectiva do SUS como provedor da atenção à saúde, e sob a perspectiva da família dos RN. Compreende-se, ainda, que os resultados obtidos nesta pesquisa poderão ser utilizados em estudos de avaliação econômica completos, além de incentivar pesquisas com a mesma temática, fortalecendo o conhecimento sobre as avaliações econômicas no campo do cuidado neonatal no Brasil. O custo direto evidenciou diferenças significativas em recém-nascidos com e sem malformações: a mediana do custo total foi 141% maior naqueles com malformação. O impacto na renda das famílias, abordadas neste estudo em virtude da internação de seus bebês na unidade neonatal, foi revelador ao demonstrar que, em pouco tempo de internação, um número expressivo de famílias experimentou gastos catastróficos: 69,4% das famílias (34 famílias), quando considerado o limiar de 10% da renda, e, para o limiar de 40%, 20,3% (10 famílias), e que esses gastos influenciaram diretamente, de forma negativa, na vivência desse processo, acendendo um sinal de alerta, pois uma parte desta população de RN não encerra sua demanda intensiva por cuidados assistenciais de saúde com a passagem pela unidade neonatal.


Regarding the demand for health care resources for the NB and the cost incurred by families, this dissertation is justified by presenting two perspectives of economic analysis: an analysis of direct cost from the perspective of the public health provider system, through an estimate of hospital costs of neonatal care in a neonatal unit, selected in a national reference hospital in the city of Rio de Janeiro, and an analysis of indirect cost from the perspective of families, centered on the caregiver during the period of hospitalization in this neonatal unit. This research focuses on the analysis of the cost of neonatal care during the hospitalization of newborns in the neonatal unit, from the perspective of the public health system as a provider of health care, and from the perspective of the newborn's family. It is also understood that the results obtained in this research can be used in complete economic evaluation studies, in addition to encouraging research on the same theme, strengthening knowledge about economic evaluations in the field of neonatal care in Brazil. The direct cost showed significant differences in newborns with and without malformations, the median total cost was 141% higher in those with malformations. The impact on the income of the families, addressed in this study due to the hospitalization of their babies in the neonatal unit, was revealing when demonstrating that, in a short period of hospitalization, a significant number of families experienced catastrophic expenses: 69.4% of the families (34 families), when considering the threshold of 10% of income, and for the threshold of 40%, 20.3% (10 families), and that these expenses had a direct negative influence in the experience of this process, lighting a warning signal because a part of this newborn population do not to end their intensive demand for health care with a visit to the neonatal unit.


Subject(s)
Humans , Infant, Newborn , Unified Health System , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Intensive Care, Neonatal , Caregivers/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Hospitalization , Brazil
4.
Pediatrics ; 148(1)2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34088759

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Laboratory testing is performed frequently in the NICU. Unnecessary tests can result in increased costs, blood loss, and pain, which can increase the risk of long-term growth and neurodevelopmental impairment. Our aim was to decrease routine screening laboratory testing in all infants admitted to our NICU by 20% over a 24-month period. METHODS: We designed and implemented a multifaceted quality improvement project using the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's Model for Improvement. Baseline data were reviewed and analyzed to prioritize order of interventions. The primary outcome measure was number of laboratory tests performed per 1000 patient days. Secondary outcome measures included number of blood glucose and serum bilirubin tests per 1000 patient days, blood volume removed per 1000 patient days, and cost. Extreme laboratory values were tracked and reviewed as balancing measures. Statistical process control charts were used to track measures over time. RESULTS: Over a 24-month period, we achieved a 26.8% decrease in laboratory tests performed per 1000 patient days (∽51 000 fewer tests). We observed significant decreases in all secondary measures, including a decrease of almost 8 L of blood drawn and a savings of $258 000. No extreme laboratory values were deemed attributable to the interventions. Improvement was sustained for an additional 7 months. CONCLUSIONS: Targeted interventions, including guideline development, dashboard creation and distribution, electronic medical record optimization, and expansion of noninvasive and point-of-care testing resulted in a significant and sustained reduction in laboratory testing without notable adverse effects.


Subject(s)
Hospitals, Pediatric/standards , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Laboratories, Hospital/standards , Quality Improvement , Unnecessary Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Bilirubin/blood , Blood Glucose/analysis , Blood Volume , Carbon Dioxide/blood , Connecticut , Hemorrhage/etiology , Hemorrhage/prevention & control , Hospitals, Pediatric/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Laboratories, Hospital/economics , Monitoring, Physiologic/adverse effects , Pain/etiology , Pain/prevention & control , Point-of-Care Testing , Procedures and Techniques Utilization , Unnecessary Procedures/economics
5.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 31(5): 1427-1433, 2021 05 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33846005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: In the context of the rising rate of diabetes in pregnancy in Australia, this study aims to examine the health service and resource use associated with diabetes during pregnancy. METHODS AND RESULTS: This project utilised a linked administrative dataset containing health and cost data for all mothers who gave birth in Queensland, Australia between 2012 and 2015 (n = 186,789, plus their babies, n = 189,909). The association between maternal characteristics and diabetes status were compared with chi-square analyses. Multiple logistic regression produced the odds ratio of having different outcomes for women who had diabetes compared to women who did not. A two-sample t-test compared the mean number of health services accessed. Generalised linear regression produced the mean costs associated with health service use. Mothers who had diabetes during pregnancy were more likely to have their labour induced at <38 weeks gestation (OR:1.39, 95% CI:1.29-1.50); have a cesarean section (OR: 1.26, 95% CI:1.22-1.31); have a preterm birth (OR:1.24, 95%: 1.18-1.32); have their baby admitted to a Special Care Nursery (OR: 2.34, 95% CI:2.26-2.43) and a Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (OR:1.25, 95%CI: 1.14-1.37). On average, mothers with diabetes access health services on more occasions during pregnancy (54.4) compared to mothers without (50.5). Total government expenditure on mothers with diabetes over the first 1000 days of the perinatal journey was significantly higher than in mothers without diabetes ($12,757 and $11,332). CONCLUSION: Overall, mothers that have diabetes in pregnancy require greater health care and resource use than mothers without diabetes in pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Cesarean Section/economics , Diabetes, Gestational/economics , Diabetes, Gestational/therapy , Health Care Costs , Health Resources/economics , Maternal Health Services/economics , Pregnancy in Diabetics/economics , Pregnancy in Diabetics/therapy , Adult , Databases, Factual , Diabetes, Gestational/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Intensive Care, Neonatal/economics , Labor, Induced/economics , Patient Admission/economics , Pregnancy , Pregnancy in Diabetics/epidemiology , Queensland , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Young Adult
6.
Eur J Pediatr ; 180(5): 1631-1635, 2021 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33415468

ABSTRACT

In the aftermath of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, we revised the cost-effectiveness of the exploited interventions in neonatal intensive care unit, to redefine future strategies for hospital management. Costs were revised with respect to the lockdown R0 or under different R0 scenarios to estimate the cost-effectiveness of the screening program adopted. Weekly nasopharyngeal swabs for parents, neonates, and personnel were the major cost during the pandemic, although they effectively reduced the number of cases in our unit.Conclusion: Parents and healthcare personnel testing appears to be an effective strategy due to the high number of contact they have within the hospital environment and outside, able to minimize the cases within our unit. What is Known: • Costs of universal COVID-19 tests for parents, neonates, and NICU personnel have not been evaluated during the COVID-19 pandemic in neonatal intensive care unit in Europe. What is New: • Weekly nasopharyngeal swabs for parents, neonates, and personnel were the major cost during the COVID-19 pandemic in NICU. • Parents and healthcare personnel testing was effective to reduce costs related to COVID-19 due to the high number of contact they have within the hospital environment and outside.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/economics , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Hospital Costs , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , COVID-19/economics , Europe , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infection Control/economics , Pandemics/prevention & control
7.
J Pediatr ; 231: 74-80, 2021 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33338495

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine associations between a graded approach to intravenous (IV) dextrose treatment for neonatal hypoglycemia and changes in blood glucose (BG), length of stay (LOS), and cost of care. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study of 277 infants born at ≥35 weeks of gestation in an urban academic delivery hospital, comparing the change in BG after IV dextrose initiation, neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) LOS, and cost of care in epochs before and after a hospital protocol change. During epoch 1, all infants who needed IV dextrose for hypoglycemia were given a bolus and started on IV dextrose at 60 mL/kg/day. During epoch 2, infants received IV dextrose at 30 or 60 mL/kg/day based on the degree of hypoglycemia. Differences in BG outcomes, LOS, and cost of hospital care between epochs were compared using adjusted median regression. RESULTS: In epoch 2, the median (IQR) rise in BG after initiating IV dextrose (19 [10, 31] mg/dL) was significantly lower than in epoch 1 (24 [14,37] mg/dL; adjusted ß = -6.0 mg/dL, 95% CI -11.2, -0.8). Time to normoglycemia did not differ significantly between epochs. NICU days decreased from a median (IQR) of 4.5 (2.1, 11.0) to 3.0 (1.5, 6.5) (adjusted ß = -1.9, 95% CI -3.0, -0.7). Costs associated with NICU hospitalization decreased from a median (IQR) $14 030 ($5847, $30 753) to $8470 ($5650, $19 019) (adjusted ß = -$4417, 95% CI -$571, -$8263) after guideline implementation. CONCLUSIONS: A graded approach to IV dextrose was associated with decreased BG lability and length and cost of NICU stay for infants with neonatal hypoglycemia.


Subject(s)
Blood Glucose/metabolism , Glucose/administration & dosage , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Sweetening Agents/administration & dosage , Administration, Intravenous , Biomarkers/blood , Boston , Drug Administration Schedule , Female , Glucose/economics , Glucose/therapeutic use , Humans , Hypoglycemia/blood , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/economics , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Retrospective Studies , Sweetening Agents/economics , Sweetening Agents/therapeutic use , Treatment Outcome
8.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 56(2): 409-417, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33200543

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the abilities of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) definitions to predict hospital charges as a surrogate of disease complexity. METHODS: Retrospective study of infants admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) less than 32 weeks gestational age. Subjects were classified according to the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN), the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (2018), and Jensen BPD definitions as none, mild (1), moderate (2), or severe (3) BPD. Spearman's correlation was performed to evaluate the association of BPD definitions with health economics outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight infants were included with mean birth weight of 1197 g and mean gestational age of 28.4 weeks. More infants were classified as no BPD according to CNN definition (79%) in comparison to NICHD 2018 (64.3%) and Jensen (59.5%) definitions. There were fewer infants as the grade of severity increased for all definitions, this was most linear for Jensen definition with Grade 1 present in 25%, Grade 2 in 12.5%, and Grade 3 in 3%. A stronger correlation with NICU length of stay, NICU hospital charges, NICU charges per day, and first year of life hospital charges was detected for Jensen definition (correlation coefficient of 0.58, 0.66, 0.64, 0.67, respectively) in comparison to CNN and NICHD 2018 definitions (p < .0001). CONCLUSION: Jensen BPD definition had the strongest correlation with first year health economics outcomes in our study. Validating recent BPD definitions using population-based data is imperative to improve family counseling and enhance the designs of quality improvement initiatives and therapeutic research studies targeting patient-centric outcomes.


Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/economics , Hospital Charges , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Severity of Illness Index , Canada , Female , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Male , Retrospective Studies
9.
J Pediatr ; 229: 161-167.e12, 2021 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32979384

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To develop and validate an itemized costing algorithm for in-patient neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) costs for infants born prematurely that can be used for quality improvement and health economic analyses. STUDY DESIGN: We sourced patient resource use data from the Canadian Neonatal Network database, with records from infants admitted to 30 tertiary NICUs in Canada. We sourced unit cost inputs from Ontario hospitals, schedules of benefits, and administrative sources. Costing estimates were generated by matching patient resource use data to the appropriate unit costs. All cost estimates were in 2017 Canadian dollars and assigned from the perspective of a provincial public payer. Results were validated using previous estimates of inpatient NICU costs and hospital case-cost estimates. RESULTS: We assigned costs to 27 742 infants born prematurely admitted from 2015 to 2017. Mean (SD) gestational age and birth weight of the cohort were 31.8 (3.5) weeks and 1843 (739) g, respectively. The median (IQR) cost of hospitalization before NICU discharge was estimated as $20 184 ($9739-51 314) for all infants; $11 810 ($6410-19 800) for infants born at gestational age of 33-36 weeks; $30 572 ($16 597-$51 857) at gestational age of 29-32 weeks; and $100 440 ($56 858-$159 3867) at gestational age of <29 weeks. Cost estimates correlated with length of stay (r = 0.97) and gestational age (r = -0.65). The estimates were consistent with provincial resource estimates and previous estimates from Canada. CONCLUSIONS: NICU costs for infants with preterm birth increase as gestation decreases and length of stay increases. Our cost estimates are easily accessible, transparent, and congruent with previous cost estimates.


Subject(s)
Algorithms , Hospitalization/economics , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Intensive Care, Neonatal/economics , Birth Weight , Canada/epidemiology , Female , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Length of Stay/economics , Male
10.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0236695, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32785282

ABSTRACT

The goal of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of the neonatal diagnosis-related group scheme in patients affected by respiratory distress syndrome. The variable costs of individual patients in the same group are examined. This study uses the data of infants (N = 243) hospitalized in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of the Gaslini Children's Hospital in Italy in 2016. The care unit's operating and management costs are employed to estimate the average cost per patient. Operating costs include those related to personnel, drugs, medical supplies, treatment tools, examinations, radiology, and laboratory services. Management costs relate to administration, maintenance, and depreciation cost of medical equipment. Cluster analysis and Tobit regression are employed, allowing for the assessment of the total cost per patient per day taking into account the main cost determinants: birth weight, gestational age, and discharge status. The findings highlight great variability in the costs for patients in the same diagnosis-related group, ranging from a minimum of €267 to a maximum of €265,669. This suggests the inefficiency of the diagnosis-related group system. Patients with very low birth weight incurred costs approximately twice the reimbursement set by the policy; a loss of €36,420 is estimated for every surviving baby with a birth weight lower than 1,170 grams. On the contrary, at term, newborns cost about €20,000 less than the diagnosis-related group reimbursement. The actual system benefits hospitals that mainly treat term infants with respiratory distress syndrome and penalizes hospitals taking care of very low birth weight patients. As a result, strategic behavior and "up-coding" might occur. We conduct a cluster analysis that suggests a birth weight adjustment to determine new fees that would be fairer than the current costs.


Subject(s)
Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/economics , Female , Gestational Age , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight/physiology , Italy/epidemiology , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/physiopathology , Risk Factors
11.
J Pediatr ; 224: 57-65.e4, 2020 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32682581

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of mother's own milk supplemented with donor milk vs mother's own milk supplemented with formula for infants of very low birth weight in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of 319 infants with very low birth weight born before (January 2011-December 2012, mother's own milk + formula, n = 150) and after (April 2013-March 2015, mother's own milk + donor milk, n = 169) a donor milk program was implemented in the NICU. Data were retrieved from a prospectively collected research database, the hospital's electronic medical record, and the hospital's cost accounting system. Costs included feedings and other NICU costs incurred by the hospital. A generalized linear regression model was constructed to evaluate the impact of feeding era on NICU total costs, controlling for neonatal and sociodemographic risk factors and morbidities. An incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated for each morbidity that differed significantly between feeding eras. RESULTS: Infants receiving mother's own milk + donor milk had a lower incidence of necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) than infants receiving mother's own milk + formula (1.8% vs 6.0%, P = .048). Total (hospital + feeding) median costs (2016 USD) were $169 555 for mother's own milk + donor milk and $185 740 for mother's own milk + formula (P = .331), with median feeding costs of $1317 and $936, respectively (P < .001). Mother's own milk + donor milk was associated with $15 555 lower costs per infant (P = .045) and saved $1812 per percentage point decrease in NEC incidence. CONCLUSIONS: The additional cost of a donor milk program was small compared with the cost of a NICU hospitalization. After its introduction, the NEC incidence was significantly lower with small cost savings per case. We speculate that NICUs with greater NEC rates may have greater cost savings.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Milk Banks/economics , Milk, Human , Breast Feeding/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Humans , Infant Formula/economics , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature, Diseases/prevention & control , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , Retrospective Studies
12.
Pediatrics ; 146(2)2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32699067

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: (1) To identify a resource use inflection point (RU-IP) beyond which patients in the NICU no longer received NICU-level care, (2) to quantify variability between hospitals in patient-days beyond the RU-IP, and (3) to describe risk factors associated with reaching an RU-IP. METHODS: We evaluated infants admitted to any of the 43 NICUs over 6 years. We determined the day that each patient's total daily standardized cost was <10% of the mean first-day NICU room cost and remained within this range through discharge (RU-IP). We compared days beyond an RU-IP, the total standardized cost of hospital days beyond the RU-IP, and the percentage of patients by hospital beyond the RU-IP. RESULTS: Among 80 821 neonates, 80.6% reached an RU-IP. In total, there were 234 478 days after the RU-IP, representing 24.3% of the total NICU days and $483 281 268 in costs. Variability in the proportion of patients reaching an RU-IP was 33.1% to 98.7%. Extremely preterm and very preterm neonates, patients discharged with home health care services, or patients receiving mechanical ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or feeding support exhibited fewer days beyond the RU-IP. Conversely, receiving methadone was associated with increased days beyond the RU-IP. CONCLUSIONS: Identification of an RU-IP may allow health care systems to identify readiness for discharge from the NICU earlier and thereby save significant NICU days and health care dollars. These data reveal the need to identify best practices in NICUs that consistently discharge infants more efficiently. Once these best practices are known, they can be disseminated to offer guidance in creating quality improvement projects to provide safer and more predictable care across hospitals for patients of all socioeconomic statuses.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Patient Discharge , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Female , Home Care Services, Hospital-Based , Hospitals, Pediatric , Humans , Infant, Extremely Premature , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Male , Methadone/administration & dosage , Nutritional Support , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Respiration, Artificial , Retrospective Studies , United States/epidemiology
14.
Indian J Public Health ; 64(1): 60-65, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32189685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Neonatal health remains a thrust area of public health, and an increased out-of-pocket expenditure (OOPE) may hamper efforts toward universal health coverage. Public spending on health remains low and insurance schemes few, thereby forcing impoverishment upon individuals already close to poverty line. OBJECTIVE: To determine catastrophic health expenditure (CHE) in neonates admitted to the government neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) and factors associated with of out-of-pocket expenditure. METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted in a governmental NICU at Agra from May 2017 to April 2018. A sample of 450 neonatal admissions was studied. Respondents were interviewed for required data. OOPE included costs at NICU, intervening health facilities, and transport as well. SPSS version (23.0 Trial) and Epi Info were used for analysis. RESULTS: Of the 450 neonates analyzed, the median total OOPE was Rs. 3000. CHE was found among 55.8% of cases with 22% spending more than their household monthly income. On binary logistic regression, a higher total OOPE of Rs. 3000 or more was found to be significantly associated with higher odds of residing outside Agra (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 1.829), delay in first cry (AOR = 1.623), referral points ≥3 (AOR = 3.449), private sector as first referral (AOR = 2.476), and when treatment was accorded during transport (AOR = 1.972). CONCLUSIONS: OOPE on neonates amounts to a substantial figure and is more than the country average. This needs to be addressed sufficiently and comprehensively through government schemes, private enterprises, and public-private partnerships.


Subject(s)
Financing, Personal/economics , Hospitals, Public/economics , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Expenditures , Humans , India/epidemiology , Infant, Low Birth Weight , Infant, Newborn , Male , Premature Birth/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Transportation/economics
15.
J Telemed Telecare ; 26(7-8): 474-481, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31046543

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Neonatal homecare (NH) can be used to provide parents the opportunity of bringing cardiopulmonary-stable preterm infants home for tube feeding and the establishment of breastfeeding supported by neonatal nurses visiting the home. However, home visits can be challenging for hospitals covering large regions, and, therefore, regular neonatal hospital care has remained the first choice in Denmark. As an alternative to home visits, telehealth may be used to deliver NH. Thus, neonatal tele-homecare (NTH) was developed. Positive infant outcomes and the optimization of family-centred care have been described, but the costs of telehealth in the context of NH remain unknown. This study aims to assess the costs of NTH compared to regular neonatal hospital care, from the health service perspective. METHODS: The cost analysis was based on an observational study of NTH in Denmark (run from November 2015 to December 2016) and followed the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards. The intervention group were the families of preterm infants receiving NTH (n = 96). The control group comprised a historic cohort of families with preterm infants, receiving standard care in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) (n = 278). NTH infants and the historical group were categorized according to gestational age at birth at/under and over 32 weeks. The outcomes were NTH resource utilization, in-NICU hospital bed days, re-admissions and total costs on average per infant. The time horizon was from birth to discharge. RESULTS: The costs of NTH resource utilization were, on average, €695 per infant, and the total costs per infant, on average, were €12,200 and €4200 for infants at/under and over 32 weeks, respectively. The corresponding costs of the control group were €14,300 and €4400. The difference in total costs showed statistical significance for the group of infants under 32 weeks (p < 0.001). DISCUSSION: The cost analysis showed that NTH was less costly compared to regular hospital care, especially for infants born with gestational age at/under 32 weeks. NTH is an appropriate model of care for preterm infants and their families, is clinically effective and less expensive than similar services delivered in the hospital.


Subject(s)
Home Care Services/economics , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Telemedicine/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Denmark , Female , Gestational Age , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Hospitals , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Male , Parents , Patient Discharge , Telemedicine/organization & administration
16.
J Healthc Risk Manag ; 39(3): 37-42, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31663250

ABSTRACT

Preterm infants born before 34 weeks gestation are unable to feed by mouth. Mothers of these preterm infants are thus asked to pump breast milk to be fed to infants through a nasogastric tube. Each mother's pumped breast milk must be carefully labelled and stored so that it is not fed to the wrong baby during the infants stay in the neonatal intensive care unit, which can range from days to months. All hospitals have strict policies and procedures in place to ensure infants are fed their mother's milk but still occasional errors are reported. We looked at the effect of introducing the enterprise risk management method in preventing breast milk errors in our neonatal intensive care unit.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Milk, Human , Safety Management/organization & administration , California , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Malpractice , Pennsylvania
17.
Adv Neonatal Care ; 19(6): 431-440, 2019 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764131

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Academy of Pediatrics and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses recognize that federal policies fail to reimburse for the provision of pasteurized donor human milk (PDHM) to the very low birth-weight neonate, and have encouraged members to advocate for the inclusion of PDHM into their respective state Medicaid programs. PURPOSE: This article describes what occurred in New York State as advocates worked for reimbursement of PDHM reimbursement by Medicaid. METHOD: Tactics utilized in New York have been presented with an advocacy framework to illustrate the necessary strategic foresight required for productive engagement within the healthcare policy arena. RESULTS: Examination of employed advocacy efforts targeted to remove known cost barriers associated with PDHM. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Full utilization of PDHM within intensive care. IMPLICATIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH: The necessity to engage in scholastic/evidence-based advocacy work.


Subject(s)
Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Medicaid/economics , Milk Banks/economics , Milk, Human , Reimbursement, Disproportionate Share , Health Policy , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Very Low Birth Weight , New York , United States
18.
J Perinat Med ; 47(8): 885-893, 2019 Oct 25.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31421044

ABSTRACT

Background Preterm newborns may be discharged when clinical conditions are stable. Several criteria for early discharge have been proposed in the literature. This study carried out the first quantitative comparison of their impact in terms of hospitalization savings, safety and costs. Methods This study was based on the clinical histories of 213 premature infants born in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit of Padova University Hospital between 2013 and 2014. Seventeen early discharge criteria were drawn from the literature and retrospectively applied to these data, and computation of hospitalization savings, safety and costs implied by each criterion was carried out. Results Among the criteria considered, average gains ranged from 1.1 to 10.3 hospital days and between 0.3 and 1.1 fewer infections per discharged infant. Criteria that led to saving more hospital days had higher cost-effectiveness in terms of crisis and infection, and they spared infants from more infections. However, episodes of apnea and bradycardia were detected after the potential early discharge date for all criteria, with a mean number of episodes numbering between 0.3 and 1.4. Conclusion The results highlight a clear trade-off between days saved and health risks for infants, with potential consequences for health care costs.


Subject(s)
Clinical Protocols , Infant, Extremely Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Patient Discharge/economics , Apnea/epidemiology , Bradycardia/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infections/epidemiology , Italy/epidemiology , Male , Retrospective Studies
19.
BMJ Open ; 9(8): e029421, 2019 08 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31444186

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: In England, for babies born at 23-26 weeks gestation, care in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) as opposed to a local neonatal unit (LNU) improves survival to discharge. This evidence is shaping neonatal health services. In contrast, there is no evidence to guide location of care for the next most vulnerable group (born at 27-31 weeks gestation) whose care is currently spread between 45 NICU and 84 LNU in England. This group represents 12% of preterm births in England and over onr-third of all neonatal unit care days. Compared with those born at 23-26 weeks gestation, they account for four times more admissions and twice as many National Health Service bed days/year. METHODS: In this mixed-methods study, our primary objective is to assess, for babies born at 27-31 weeks gestation and admitted to a neonatal unit in England, whether care in an NICU vs an LNU impacts on survival and key morbidities (up to age 1 year), at each gestational age in weeks. Routinely recorded data extracted from real-time, point-of-care patient management systems held in the National Neonatal Research Database, Hospital Episode Statistics and Office for National Statistics, for January 2014 to December 2018, will be analysed. Secondary objectives are to assess (1) whether differences in care provided, rather than a focus on LNU/NICU designation, drives gestation-specific outcomes, (2) where care is most cost-effective and (3) what parents' and clinicians' perspectives are on place of care, and how these could guide clinical decision-making. Our findings will be used to develop recommendations, in collaboration with national bodies, to inform clinical practice, commissioning and policy-making. The project is supported by a parent advisory panel and a study steering committee. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Research ethics approval has been obtained (IRAS 212304). Dissemination will be through publication of findings and development of recommendations for care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02994849 and ISRCTN74230187.


Subject(s)
Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/standards , Intensive Care, Neonatal/economics , Intensive Care, Neonatal/standards , Research Design , England , Gestational Age , Humans , Infant , Infant Mortality , Infant, Newborn , Qualitative Research , Survival Analysis
20.
PLoS One ; 14(6): e0211997, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31237874

ABSTRACT

Preterm birth incidence has risen globally and remains a major cause of neonatal mortality despite improved survival. Demand and cost of initial hospitalization has also increased. This study assessed the cost of preterm birth during initial hospitalization from care provider perspective in neonatal intensive care units (NICU) of two hospitals in the state of Kedah, Malaysia. It utilized universal sampling and prospectively followed up preterm infants till discharge. Care provider cost was assessed using mixed method of top down approach and activity based costing. A total of 112 preterm infants were recruited from intensive care (93 infants) and minimal care (19 infants) units. Majority were from the moderate (23%) and late (36%) preterm groups followed by very preterm (32%) and extreme preterm (9%). Median cost per infant increased with level of care and degree of prematurity. Cost was dominated by overhead (fixed) costs for general (hospital), intermediate (clinical support services) and final (NICU) cost centers where it constituted at least three quarters of admission cost per infant while the remainder was consumables (variable) cost. Breakdown of overhead cost showed NICU specific overhead contributing at least two thirds of admission cost per infant. Personnel salary made up three quarters of NICU specific overhead. Laboratory investigation was the cost driver for consumables. Gender, birth weight and length of stay were significant factors and cost prediction was developed with these variables. This study demonstrated the inverse relation between resource utilization, cost and prematurity and identified personnel salary as the cost driver. Cost estimates and prediction provide in-depth understanding of provider cost and are applicable for further economic evaluations. Since gender is non-modifiable and reducing LOS alone is not effective, birth weight as a cost predictive factor in this study can be addressed through measures to prevent or delay preterm birth.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis , Hospitalization/economics , Premature Birth/economics , Birth Weight , Female , Health Personnel , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/economics , Length of Stay , Malaysia/epidemiology , Male , Pregnancy , Sex Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...