The Evolving Landscape of Impella Use in the United States Among Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Mechanical Circulatory Support.

BACKGROUND: Impella was approved for mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in 2008, but large-scale, real-world data on its use are lacking. Our objective was to describe trends and variations in Impella use, clinical outcomes, and costs across US hospitals in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) treated with MCS (Impella or intra-aortic balloon pump). METHODS: From the Premier Healthcare Database, we analyzed 48 306 patients undergoing PCI with MCS at 432 hospitals between January 2004 and December 2016. Association analyses were performed at 3 levels: time period, hospital, and patient. Hierarchical models with propensity adjustment were used for association analyses. We examined trends and variations in the proportion of Impella use, and associated clinical outcomes (in-hospital mortality, bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury, stroke, length of stay, and hospital costs). RESULTS: Among patients undergoing PCI treated with MCS, 4782 (9.9%) received Impella; its use increased over time, reaching 31.9% of MCS in 2016. There was wide variation in Impella use across hospitals (>5-fold variation). Specifically, among patients receiving Impella, there was a wide variation in outcomes of bleeding (>2.5-fold variation), and death, acute kidney injury, and stroke (all ≈1.5-fold variation). Adverse outcomes and costs were higher in the Impella era (years 2008-2016) versus the pre-Impella era (years 2004-2007). Hospitals with higher Impella use had higher rates of adverse outcomes and costs. After adjustment for the propensity score, and accounting for clustering of patients by hospitals, Impella use was associated with death: odds ratio, 1.24 (95% CI, 1.13-1.36); bleeding: odds ratio, 1.10 (95% CI, 1.00-1.21); and stroke: odds ratio, 1.34 (95% CI, 1.18-1.53), although a similar, nonsignificant result was observed for acute kidney injury: odds ratio, 1.08 (95% CI, 1.00-1.17). CONCLUSIONS: Impella use is rapidly increasing among patients undergoing PCI treated with MCS, with marked variability in its use and associated outcomes. Although unmeasured confounding cannot be ruled out, when analyzed by time periods, or at the hospital level or the patient level, Impella use was associated with higher rates of adverse events and costs. More data are needed to define the appropriate role of MCS in patients undergoing PCI.

Trends, Predictors, and Outcomes of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support for Postcardiac Surgery Cardiogenic Shock.

Postcardiac surgery cardiogenic shock (PCCS) is seen in 2% to 6% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery. There are limited large-scale data on the use of mechanical circulatory support (MCS) in these patients. This study sought to evaluate the in-hospital mortality, trends, and resource utilization for PCCS admissions with and without MCS. A retrospective cohort of PCCS between 2005 and 2014 with and without the use of temporary MCS was identified from the National Inpatient Sample. Admissions for permanent MCS and heart transplant were excluded. Propensity-matching for baseline characteristics was performed. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and secondary outcomes included trends in use, hospital costs and lengths of stay. In the period between 2005 and 2014, there were 132,485 admissions with PCCS, with 51.3% requiring MCS. The intra-aortic balloon pump was the predominant device used with a steady increase in other devices. MCS use for more frequent in younger patients, males and those with higher co-morbidity. There was a decrease in MCS use across all demographic categories and hospital characteristics over time. Older age, female sex, previous cardiovascular morbidity and MCS use were independently predictive of higher in-hospital mortality. In 6,830 propensity-matched pairs, PCCS admissions that required MCS use, had higher in-hospital mortality (odds ratio 2.4; p<0.001), higher hospital costs ($98,759 ± 907 vs $81,099 ± 698; p<0.001) but not a longer length of stay compared with those without MCS use. In conclusion, in patients with PCCS, this study noted a steady decrease in MCS use. Use of MCS identified PCCS patients at higher risk for in-hospital mortality and greater resource utilization.

Etiologies and predictors of 30-day readmissions in patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: Insights from the Nationwide Readmissions Database.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS)-assisted percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) represent a high-risk group vulnerable to complications and readmissions. HYPOTHESIS: Thirty-day readmissions after pMCS-assisted PCI are common among patients with comorbidities and account for a significant amount of healthcare spending. METHODS: Patients undergoing PCI and pMCS (Impella, TandemHeart, or intra-aortic balloon pump) for any indication between January 1, 2012, and November 30, 2014, were selected from the Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were identified using appropriate ICD-9-CM codes. Clinical risk factors and complications were analyzed for association with 30-day readmission. RESULTS: Our analysis included 29 247 patients, of which 4535 (15.5%) were readmitted within 30 days. On multivariate analysis, age ≥ 65 years, female sex, hypertension, diabetes, chronic lung disease, heart failure, prior implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, liver disease, end-stage renal disease, and length of stay ≥5 days during index hospitalization were independent predictors of 30-day readmission. Cardiac etiologies accounted for ~60% of readmissions, of which systolic or diastolic heart failure (22%), stable coronary artery disease (11.1%), acute coronary syndromes (8.9%), and nonspecific chest pain (4.0%) were the most common causes. In noncardiac causes, sepsis/septic shock (4.6%), hypotension/syncope (3.2%), gastrointestinal bleed (3.1%), and acute kidney injury (2.6%) were among the most common causes of 30-day readmissions. Mean length of stay and cost of readmissions was 4 days and $16 191, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thirty-day readmissions after pMCS-assisted PCI are common and are predominantly associated with increased burden of comorbidities. Reducing readmissions for common cardiac etiologies could save substantial healthcare costs.

National trends, predictors of use, and in-hospital outcomes in mechanical circulatory support for cardiogenic shock.

AIMS: Despite rising rates of cardiogenic shock (CS), data on trends and in-hospital outcomes of short-term non-durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are limited. Thus, we aimed to identify recent national trends in MCS utilisation in the USA, patient-level predictors of MCS use, and in-hospital outcomes in CS inclusive of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalisations of US adults with a discharge diagnosis of CS, from January 2004 to December 2014, in the National Inpatient Sample were included. Rates of MCS were stratified by device type and clinical presentation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospitalisation costs, and number of procedures. A total of 183,516 hospitalisations with CS (47,636 [25.9%] involving MCS) were included. MCS recipients were younger, less frequently female, received more procedures, had higher costs, and more frequently presented with MI (MCS vs. non-MCS: 71.6% vs. 42.9%; p<0.0001). Growth in CS hospitalisations (214.4%) outpaced annual MCS use (160.0%), with relative declines in intra-aortic balloon pump use starting in 2008. Right heart catheterisation rates for both groups remained low (MCS vs. non-MCS: 5.9% vs. 3.3%; p<0.0001). In-hospital mortality declined but remained high in both groups (MCS vs. non-MCS [2014]: 32.7% vs. 41.5%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality for CS has declined but remains high. Rates of CS have outpaced MCS utilisation which remains uncommon in non-MI hospitalisations with shock. MCS is associated with utilisation of other procedures during hospitalisation.

Prophylactic Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump Before Ventricular Assist Device Implantation Reduces Perioperative Medical Expenses and Improves Postoperative Clinical Course in INTERMACS Profile 2 Patients.

BACKGROUND: Although intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is sometimes used before cardiac surgery to achieve better outcome in high-risk patients, the clinical impact of prophylactic IABP support before left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation in patients with worsening hemodynamics was unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: We enrolled 22 patients with worsening hemodynamics who had received IABP support before LVAD (IABP group), and also enrolled 22 patients receiving neither IABP nor extracorporeal membrane oxygenation before LVAD, who were selected on propensity score matching (non-IABP group). Although both groups had similar preoperative background, the IABP group had shorter postoperative intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and more improved hemodynamics (P<0.05 for all). Serum total bilirubin and creatinine decreased significantly in the IABP group compared with the non-IABP group during 1 month after LVAD implantation (P<0.05 for both). Medical expenses during perioperative ICU stay were significantly lower in the IABP group compared with the non-IABP group, even including the cost of preoperative IABP support (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic IABP support in heart failure patients with worsening hemodynamics improves post-LVAD clinical course and reduces perioperative medical expenses.

Economic implications of intra-aortic balloon support for myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock: an analysis from the IABP-SHOCK II-trial.

BACKGROUND: The Intra-aortic Balloon Pump in Cardiogenic Shock II (IABP-SHOCK II) trial has demonstrated the safety of intra-aortic balloon (IABP) support in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) complicated by cardiogenic shock, but no beneficial effect on mortality. Currently, intra-aortic balloon pumping is still the most widely used support device. However, little is known about the economic implications associated with this device. METHODS: Data of 600 patients included in the IABP-SHOCK II trial (registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT00491036) with follow-up at 30 days, 6 and 12 months were subjected to an economic analysis. Patients with cardiogenic shock complicating AMI were randomly assigned to IABP additionally to optimal medical therapy (OMT; n = 301) or OMT alone (n = 299) before early revascularization. Costs were calculated from the perspective of a German healthcare payer. Cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analyses were performed using quality-adjusted life years (QALY) and reduction in New York Heart Association (NYHA) and Canadian Cardiac Society (CCS) class as effectiveness measures. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant difference in overall costs between the IABP (33,155 ± 14,593 ) and the control group (32,538 ± 14,031 , p < 0.00001). This was predominantly attributed to the IABP costs in the IABP (760 ± 174 ) versus control group (64 ± 218 , p < 0.0001) whilst the intensive care unit costs did not differ between the groups (29,177 ± 12,013 and 29,401 ± 12,063 , p = 0.82). There was no significant difference in QALY or NYHA and CCS reduction, respectively (p = n.s.). CONCLUSION: IABP support is associated with higher healthcare costs as compared to conservative treatment regimens. Clinically, IABP support cannot generally be recommended in AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock in the absence of a mortality benefit. However, economically considering the relatively little contribution to overall costs generated by IABP therapy it may still be considered if clinical scenarios with an IABP-induced benefit may be identified in the future.

Economic and operational implications of a standardized approach to hemodynamic support therapy using percutaneous cardiac assist devices.

OBJECTIVE: Impella 2.5 has been shown to reduce major adverse events for patients undergoing elective high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention. We performed a single-center retrospective study to compare the costs and resource use of Impella 2.5 and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) support. METHODS: All high-risk patients who received Impella 2.5 (n = 35) and IABP (n = 295) support from December 2008 to July 2011 were included. Propensity score matching identified a balanced 1:1 matched cohort (35 Impella vs 35 IABP) based on indications for implantation, preimplantation hemodynamics, and age. Diagnostic, procedural, financial, and resource use data were collected. RESULTS: As compared with IABP, Impella offered a more predictable course of treatment/resource consumption and was not associated with any extreme cost outliers (17.1% vs 0.0%, respectively; P = 0.025). The mean admission and 90-day episode of care total costs for Impella were 5.5% ($67,681 vs $71,608, P = 0.79) and 4.2% ($70,680 vs $73,476, P = 0.85) lesser than that for IABP, respectively. Although not statistically significant, Impella patients had a trend toward lower rehospitalization rates (11.4% vs 20%), lesser mean index length of hospital stay (11.2 vs 13.7), and 90-day (11.7 vs 14.2) episode of care length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Impella support was associated with consistent course of treatment/resource consumption with significantly fewer 90-day extreme cost outliers than was IABP. The lower index and 90-day follow-up cost trends observed for Impella were driven by shorter length of hospital stay and fewer rehospitalizations. As providers strive to improve quality of care by reducing variability, these findings have implications for the development of hemodynamic support algorithms.

Trends in incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Limited information is available on the contemporary and potentially changing trends in the incidence, management, and outcomes of cardiogenic shock complicating ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). METHODS AND RESULTS: We queried the 2003-2010 Nationwide Inpatient Sample databases to identify all patients ≥ 40 years of age with STEMI and cardiogenic shock. Overall and age-, sex-, and race/ethnicity-specific trends in incidence of cardiogenic shock, early mechanical revascularization, and intra-aortic balloon pump use, and inhospital mortality were analyzed. From 2003 to 2010, among 1 990 486 patients aged ≥ 40 years with STEMI, 157 892 (7.9%) had cardiogenic shock. The overall incidence rate of cardiogenic shock in patients with STEMI increased from 6.5% in 2003 to 10.1% in 2010 (P(trend)<0.001). There was an increase in early mechanical revascularization (30.4% to 50.7%, P(trend)<0.001) and intra-aortic balloon pump use (44.8% to 53.7%, P(trend)<0.001) in these patients over the 8-year period. Inhospital mortality decreased significantly, from 44.6% to 33.8% (P(trend)<0.001; adjusted OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.68 to 0.75), whereas the average total hospital cost increased from $35 892 to $45 625 (P(trend)<0.001) during the study period. There was no change in the average length of stay (P(trend)=0.394). These temporal trends were similar in patients <75 and ≥ 75 years of age, men and women, and across each racial/ethnic group. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of cardiogenic shock complicating STEMI has increased during the past 8 years together with increased use of early mechanical revascularization and intra-aortic balloon pumps. There has been a concomitant decrease in risk-adjusted inhospital mortality, but an increase in total hospital costs during this period.

Health care costs related to out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Although cost analyses for emergency care are essential, data on costs of care for out-of-hospital cardiopulmonary arrest (OHCA) are scarce. The present study aimed to analyze health care costs related to OHCA using a nationwide administrative database in Japan. METHODS: Using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan, we identified OHCA patients who were transported to 779 emergency medical centres between July and December in 2008 and 2009. We assessed patient survival and discharge status, receipt of specific treatments, and costs of in-hospital care. RESULTS: A total of 21,750 OHCA patients were identified. Overall, 59.6% were males, and the average age was 70.3 years. Of them, 1394 (6.4%) resulted in death without attempted resuscitation after hospital arrival (Group A), 14,973 (69.0%) died on admission day despite resuscitation attempts (Group B), 3680 (17.0%) died at ≥2 days after admission despite resuscitation attempts (Group C), 785 (3.6%) survived and were discharged to home (Group D) and 873 (4.0%) survived and discharged to other than home (Group E). The median total costs were $434, $1735, $4869, $28,097 and $31,161 in Groups A to E, respectively. Positive survival status, longer hospital stay and receipt of specific treatments were significant predictors of higher total costs. After adjustment for these factors, higher age was associated with lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in the present study add further evidence to existing knowledge about healthcare costs related to OHCA.

The cost-effectiveness of a new percutaneous ventricular assist device for high-risk PCI patients: mid-stage evaluation from the European perspective.

OBJECTIVE: A new and smaller percutaneous ventricular assist device (pVAD, Impella, Abiomed, Danvers, MA) has been developed to provide circulatory support in hemodynamically unstable patients and to prevent hemodynamic collapse during high-risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). The objective of the study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of this specific device compared to the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) from the European perspective. Additional analysis on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was conducted for observational purposes only, given its use in some European countries. METHODS: A combination of a decision tree and Markov model was developed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the small, pVAD. The short-term (30-day) effectiveness and safety (early survival, risk of bleeding, and stroke) were modeled, as well as long-term risk of major adverse cardiovascular events (recurrent myocardial infarction, stroke, and heart failure). The short-term effectiveness and safety data for the device were obtained from two registries (the Europella and USpella), both of which are large multi-center studies in high-risk patient groups. Probabilities of long-term major adverse cardiovascular events were obtained from various published clinical studies. The economic analysis was conducted from a German statutory health insurance perspective and only direct medical costs were included. Cost-effectiveness was estimated over a 10-year time horizon. RESULTS: Compared with IABP, the pVAD generated an incremental quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) of 0.22 (with Euro-registry data) and 0.27 (with US-registry data). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the device varied between €38,069 (with Euro-registry data) and €31,727 (with US-registry data) per QALY compared with IABP. KEY LIMITATIONS: Unadjusted, indirect comparisons of short-term effectiveness and safety between the interventions were used in the model. Cost and utility data were retrieved from various sources. Therefore, differences in patient populations may bias the estimated cost-effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with IABP, the pVAD is a cost-effective intervention for high-risk PCI patients, with ICERs well-below the conventional cost-effectiveness threshold.

Reducing the ischemic time of donor hearts will decrease morbidity and costs of cardiac transplantations.

With liberalization of donor eligibility criteria, donor hearts are being harvested from remote locations, increasing ischemic times. The aim of this study was to examine the effect of total ischemic time (TIT) on length of stay in the intensive care unit (LOS in ICU) and its economic consequences. The study population included recipients without prior mechanical support undergoing heart transplantation between 1998 and 2008 at a single institution. The mean age of the 72 recipients (56 men, 16 women) was 50.6 years (range 15-68 years) and the mean donor age was 41.5 years (range 11-61 years). The median TIT was 181.2 min (range 107-243) and median LOS in ICU was 11.5 days (range 3-107 days). There was a statistically significant linear relationship between TIT and LOS in ICU r(72)=0.317, P=0.004. Each 5 min and 38 s of TIT equated to one more day in ICU. An ischemic time >180 min was associated with higher LOS in ICU, renal failure, and a more frequent use of nitric oxide in our cohort. For longer distance harvesting, the reduction of TIT by the fastest possible transport (learjet, helicopter) would have economic advantages with regards to the high cost of treatment in ICU.

Ambulatory intraaortic balloon pump use as bridge to heart transplant.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluates a modification of an ambulatory intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) technique used in patients with heart failure of ischemic origin for bridge to transplant. METHODS: In this retrospective review we evaluated the ability to place the ambulatory IABP, any complications, time on device, and success in bridging to transplant on the ambulatory IABP device. In addition, the cost as compared to current ventricular assist devices was determined. RESULTS: Between July 2000 and November 2001, 4 patients have been managed with ambulatory IABP in our combined University of Wisconsin and William S. Middleton Veterans Administration programs. All 4 patients had ischemia as their mode of heart failure, and each had a relative contraindication to standard ventricular assist device use. All 4 patients had ambulatory IABPs successfully placed through the left axillary artery without complication, and were able to ambulate early after ambulatory IABP placement, and increased their rehabilitation status before transplantation. Ambulatory IABP support ranged from 12 to 70 days. All 4 patients have been successfully transplanted and discharged from the hospital. Use of the ambulatory IABP support, even with multiple replacements, translated to 10- to 50-fold savings for each of the reported patients versus standard ventricular assist device use. CONCLUSIONS: As a result of our initial experience, we believe that ambulatory IABP is an excellent mode of support in selected patients, and is cost-effective, as compared to conventional ventricular assist device therapy.

Economic impact of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary patients.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high-risk coronary patients has been demonstrated earlier. METHODS: This study investigates the economic aspect by a detailed cost analysis of pooled information from two previously published randomized studies and 144 consecutive low-risk coronary artery bypass graft operations. Costs for patients receiving preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy before aortic cross-clamping (n = 62) were compared to those in a control group (n = 50). Detailed cost analysis was based on data provided by the hospital finance department. RESULTS: The total hospital costs were as follows: low-risk coronary artery bypass graft operations cost 35,335+/-1,694 Swiss francs ($23,400+/-$1,121); high-risk coronary artery bypass graft without preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy cost 65,892+/-31,719 Swiss francs ($43,637+/-$21,006); and high risk coronary artery bypass graft with preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy cost 41,948+/-10,379 Swiss francs ($27,780+/-$6,874) (p = 0.0015). There were no significant differences in average cost among the preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative intraaortic balloon pump therapy in high risk coronary patients is significantly cost-beneficial, With an average saving of 24,000 Swiss francs ($16,000) on the total hospital cost, a 36% cost reduction.

The treatment of low cardiac output syndrome following cardiopulmonary bypass using delayed sternal closure.

The purpose of this study, was to ascertain whether delayed sternal closure (DSC) could eliminate the need for an intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) or ventricular assist device (VAD) in patients with low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS) following coronary artery bypass grafting surgery (CABG). To investigate this, the records of 3014 patients undergoing CABG were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty (2.0%) patients had a relative or absolute contraindication to IABP or VAD use and required DSC for LCOS. DSC resolved 45 (75%) of these patients' LCOS, requiring an average of 1.6 +/- 0.7 days and producing a mean change in cardiac index of +1.0 +/- 0.3 L/min/m2. Fifteen (25%) of these patients did not resolve their LCOS after DSC and required either an IABP (11) or a VAD (4). Significant postoperative morbidity occurred in 22 (36.7%) patients but were not related to DSC. Only one (1.7%) sternal wound infection occurred from a total of 147 patient-days of DSC. Operative mortality was 47 per cent (28) but was not unexpected based on the number of urgent/emergent (48; 80%) and reoperative (40; 67%) procedures but does not appear to be related to the technique of DSC. DSC appears to be a simple and safe method for treating LCOS following CABG. It is effective in resolving the majority of patients' LCOS without the addition of any significant morbidity. DSC also spares these patients the added morbidity, mortality, and cost associated with circulatory assist devices.

Economic implications of the prophylactic use of intraaortic balloon counterpulsation in the setting of acute myocardial infarction. The Randomized IABP Study Group. Intraaortic Balloon Pump.

Intraaortic balloon counterpulsation (IABP) has been shown to improve coronary artery patency and reduce the rates of recurrent myocardial ischemia and its sequelae in selected patients when used within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction. The economic implications of prophylactic IABP use are unknown. We obtained hospital bills for 102 patients enrolled in the Randomized IABP Trial (56%) and converted charges to costs using each hospital's Medicare cost report. In-hospital costs for patients who had 48 hours of IABP were compared with those of patients who did not. The costs of angiographic and clinical complications were determined. Small differences in clinical and angiographic characteristics existed between patients in the economic substudy and the overall population, but overall angiographic and clinical outcomes were comparable. Costs for patients who had IABP versus control patients were similar: mean $22,357 +/- $14,369 versus $19,211 +/- $8,414, median (25th and 75th percentiles) $17,903 ($15,787, $22,147) versus $17,913 ($15,144, $21,433), p = 0.45. Hospital costs were higher with the development of recurrent ischemia: mean $23,125 +/- $7,690 versus $20,416 +/- $12,449, median $21,069 ($17,896, $26,885) versus $17,492 ($14,892, $20,998) p = 0.02. Patients who had an adverse clinical event (death, stroke, reinfarction, and emergency revascularization) also had higher hospital costs: mean $25,598 +/- $10,024 versus $19,790 +/- $12,045, median $21,877 ($18,380, $28,049) versus $17,364 ($14,773, $20,779), p = 0.002. The prophylactic use of IABP in patients at high risk of infarct artery reocclusion within 24 hours of acute myocardial infarction provides sustained clinical benefit without substantially increasing hospital costs.

Intra-aortic balloon pumping in the community hospital setting.

A community-hospital IABP program provides potentially lifesaving treatment for patients with lethal cardiac problems. Similar to the rapidly growing number of other community hospitals with IABP programs, Landmark Hospital in Rhode Island has successfully implemented this modality of cardiac care, once limited to tertiary care facilities. Although the challenges the community hospital faces when establishing an IABP program and maintaining clinical competency are unique, IABP in the community hospital is a proven treatment modality that decreases mortality rates.

Efficacy and cost-effectiveness of preoperative IABP in patients with ejection fraction of 0.25 or less.

BACKGROUND: The purposes of this study are to determine whether patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction benefit from prophylactic insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump and to evaluate its cost-effectiveness. METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 1995, 163 consecutive patients with a left ventricular ejection fraction of 0.25 or less underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting. An intraaortic balloon pump was inserted before operation in 37 patients (group A). The remaining 126 patients underwent operation without preoperative insertion of the device (group B). Preoperatively, 91.9% (34/37) of group A patients and 54.8% (69/126) of group B patients were in New York Heart Association functional class III or IV (p < 0.001). RESULTS: The 30-day mortality rate was 2.7% (1/37) and 11.9% (15/126) for groups A and B, respectively (p < 0.005). All deaths occurred in patients in functional class III or IV. In group B, 28 patients (22.2%) required an intraaortic balloon pump after cardiotomy for low cardiac output, 42.9% (12/28) of whom died. Median postoperative hospital stay was 9.9 days and 12.0 days, and mean hospital charges were $50,627 and $54,818 for survivors in groups A and B; respectively (p = not significant). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience suggests that patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting may benefit from preoperative intraaortic balloon pump insertion, especially patients in functional class III or IV. This approach improved survival significantly, reduced hospital stay, and was more cost-effective.

Experiences of postcardiotomy assist: pneumatic ventricular assist device or venoarterial bypass with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support.

From October 1982 to the present, 16 patients have been supported by a pneumatic ventricular assist device (VAD). Since April 1990, we have introduced a venoarterial bypass (VAB) with percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) system. This PCPS system was used in 12 patients. The long-term survival rate of PCPS cases (41%) was much better than that of VAD cases (19%). The main cause of death in VAD cases was multiple organ failure (MOF). Although VAB was initiated more recently than VAD, the duration on support was longer in the VAD group than in the VAB group. Because of the longer support duration and the presence of many patients with MOF, coagulopathy deteriorated more readily in the VAD group than in the VAB group. In the case of postcardiotomy cardiopulmonary bypass weaning or low-output syndrome (LOS), the VAB with PCPS system should be applied first under intraaortic balloon pumping assist because of its simplicity and low cost. Thereafter, VAD should be applied in cases refractory to VAB support.

Hospital charges for conventional therapy versus left ventricular assist system therapy in heart transplant patients.

An important goal of a left ventricular assist system (LVAS) is to provide long-term, safe, cost-effective mechanical circulatory support. The Heartmate LVAS (Thermo Cardiosystems, Inc., Woburn, MA), used in recent clinical trials as a bridge to transplantation, has proven extremely reliable for long periods, and its use has improved the survival rates in patients who subsequently received a donor heart. Patients who have been implanted with an LVAS often have significantly improved physical status and can leave the intensive care unit (ICU) and be treated at less expense elsewhere in the hospital. In this preliminary report, the authors analyzed hospital charges for three groups of patients: heart transplant patients who received conventional medical therapy before transplantation (Group 1), transplant patients who received in-hospital LVAS therapy (Group 2), and one patient who awaited transplantation at home while undergoing LVAS support. Group 1 patients (n = 6) received intraaortic balloon pump (IABP) support and inotropic therapy in an ICU before transplantation. Group 2 (n = 6) patients were receiving IABP support and inotropic therapy when the LVAS was implanted and eventually underwent heart transplantation. The length of hospital stay in Group 1 (51 days) was significantly shorter than in Group 2 (185 days). Mean hospital charge in Group 1 was $5,150/day; in Group 2, $3,178/day. The patient living at home incurred an average medical expense of $27/day. Although LVAS supported patients remain in the hospital much longer than do medically treated patients, their average daily in-hospital charges are much less. If the LVAS could be used as an alternative to transplantation, it might offer not only a longer, better quality life, but also a potential cost savings to patients with end-stage heart failure.