Editorial Commentary: Anterior Shoulder Stabilization Combining Arthroscopic Bankart and Inferior Capsular Shift Avoids Open Surgery in Athletes Without Critical Glenoid Bone Loss.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations can cause a myriad of injuries, each with their own unique set of challenges with respect to surgical management. The debate of whether open or arthroscopic management is the superior approach is one that predates most currently practicing orthopaedic surgeons yet remains one of the most actively researched areas of orthopaedics. Current trends favor arthroscopic management for anterior instability secondary to a Bankart lesion in patients without other risk factors for instability, such as critical glenoid bone loss. However, excellent results are not guaranteed following arthroscopic Bankart repair, particularly in athletes, due to high rates of recurrence. While the technique of inferior to superior capsular shift is not new, transitioning a historically open technique to the arthroscopic world may represent another tool in the glenohumeral instability management toolbox. While perspectives are evolving, more evidence supporting arthroscopic techniques like the capsular shift are needed to better identify appropriate patient populations.

Editorial Commentary: Capsule Repair Is Necessary at the Conclusion of Arthroscopy to Optimize Return to Full Activity.

Hip capsulotomy and capsule repair have minimal effect on joint kinematics during activities of daily living. With low demands placed on the hip, the hip capsule may provide little to no role on hip stability or microinstability. But the majority, if not all, patients undergoing hip arthroscopy are not content with only resuming basic activities of daily living. Seeking to optimize the hip joint to its maximum capacity should be the goal. Capsule repair is necessary in most to achieve that goal.

Editorial Commentary: Interportal Capsulotomy for Hip Arthroscopy in Patients With Borderline Hip Dysplasia May Result in Inferior Outcomes: Periportal Capsulotomy May Reduce Hip Capsular Damage.

Management of the hip capsule remains an ongoing discussion in the field of hip arthroscopy. Interportal and T-capsulotomies remain the most common approaches to gain access to the hip during surgery, and biomechanical and clinical research supports repair of these types of capsulotomies. Less is known, however, about the quality of the tissue that heals at these repair sites during the postoperative period, particularly in the setting of patients with borderline hip dysplasia. The capsular tissue provides important joint stability to these patients, and disruption to the capsule can result in significant functional impairments. There is also an association between borderline hip dysplasia and joint hypermobility, which increases the risk of insufficient healing after capsular repair. Patients with borderline hip dysplasia show poor capsular healing after arthroscopy followed by interportal hip capsule repair, and incomplete healing results in inferior patient-reported outcomes. Periportal capsulotomy may limit capsular violation and improve outcomes.

Healing of joint capsule after hip arthroscopy using interportal capsulotomy and capsular closure influences clinical outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Hip arthroscopy for treatment of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) has developed rapidly and has been shown to significantly decrease pain and improve hip function. However, the relationship between hip capsule characteristics and healing after arthroscopic surgery and changes in patient-reported outcomes scores (PROs) for postoperative pain, function, and symptoms is still uncertain. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patients who were diagnosed with FAI and underwent hip arthroscopy for treatment in our hospital between May 2018 and November 2020. All patients had preoperative MRI and postoperative MRI at least 6 months after arthroscopy. Hip capsular thickness was measured at the proximal, middle, and distal site of the capsule. PROs and PROs at final follow-up were obtained, including visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS). RESULTS: A total of 194 patients were included in this study. The mean MRI follow-up time was 14.3 (range, 6-37) months, and the mean clinical follow-up time was 26.1 (range, 12-43) months. Postoperative capsular thickness or net change were not correlated with postoperative PROs and VAS (P > .05). Capsular defect was observed in 17 (8.8%) patients. Patients with capsular defect had a relatively higher BMI (P < .05). Patients with capsular defect had a significant lower mHHS and higher VAS compared with patients with continuous capsule (P < .05). Ninety-one percentage of patients with continuous capsule surpassed minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and 80.8% achieved PASS, but only 58.8% of patients with capsular defect surpassed MCID and 47.1% achieved patient acceptable symptom state (PASS). CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative capsular thickness may not have influence on the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI. Some capsule of patients who underwent arthroscopic interportal capsulotomy and repair could not heal. Postoperative capsular continuity had a great impact on the clinical outcomes of hip arthroscopy for FAI. Patients with higher BMI may be more likely to have capsule failure to heal.

Denervation With Periosteal Resection of the First Carpometacarpal Joint.

Osteoarthritis of the first carpometacarpal joint is a frequent condition that hand surgeons have to deal with. When conservative measures such as physiotherapy, steroid injections, or splinting fail to alleviate symptoms, trapeziectomy is considered the gold standard for surgical treatment. In the present article, a novel technique is presented to denervate the joint capsule together with the periosteum and the endosteum to address sensory receptors located in these 2 extracapsular structures in the proximity of the first carpometacarpal joint area. Denervation with periosteal resection, apart from being a relatively easy and less aggressive technique compared with trapeziectomy, offers satisfactory pain relief with a faster recovery time.

Midterm Results of Arthroscopy-Assisted "Tent Form" Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Repair With Dorsal Distal Radioulnar Joint Capsule Imbrication for Posttraumatic Chronic Distal Radioulnar Joint Instability.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the outcomes of "tent form" triangular fibrocartilage complex (TFCC) repair combined with dorsal distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) capsule imbrication for posttraumatic chronic DRUJ instability. METHODS: All patients treated with arthroscopic "tent form" TFCC repair and DRUJ capsule imbrication from 2016 to 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were symptomatic chronic DRUJ instability for >6 months and dorsal DRUJ subluxation on magnetic resonance imaging. The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, grip strength, Modified Mayo Wrist Score, range of motion, and distal radioulnar joint stability were assessed for a minimum of 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients were included in the final analysis. The average follow-up duration was 35.6 months (range, 24-48 months). The 24-month postoperative grip strengths and 3-dimensional motions of wrist were not significantly different from that of the nonoperated wrist. Compared with their preoperative status, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation, and Modified Mayo Wrist Score indicated the significant improvement with P values of .001, .001, and .002, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In chronic DRUJ instability with a loosening dorsal capsule, "tent form" TFCC transcapsular repair combined with DRUJ capsule imbrication restored the integrity of TFCC and dorsal DRUJ capsule and achieved a promising outcome. We recommend this procedure as an option of treatment for patients with posttraumatic chronic DRUJ instability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Improved Outside-In Suture through the Joint Capsule to Repair the Palmer I-B Triangular Fibrocartilage Complex Superficial Injury.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of type I-B triangular fibrocartilage complex superficial injury is always a challenge to orthopedists. The traditional outside-in suture method often causes a risk of nervous irritation. We designed a modified outside-in suture through the joint capsule to repair the Palmer I-B triangular fibrocartilage complex superficial injury. METHODS: From December 2014 to December 2018, we retrospectively collected the medical records of 18 patients in our hospital who used the modified outside-in suture through the joint capsule to repair type I-B triangular fibrocartilage complex superficial injury. Among them, there were 12 males and 6 females, with an average age of 36.2 years. There were 6 cases on the left side and 12 cases on the right side. Record the healing time of all patients after surgery and the occurrence of related complications, and record the pain visual analogue scale (VAS), grip strength, wrist flexion and extension, radioulnar deviation and forearm rotation range of motion, modified Mayo wrist joint function score, and disability of arm-shoulder-hand (DASH) score before operation and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: One patient was lost to follow-up, and a total of 17 patients received the final follow-up. Patients were followed up for 24 to 36 months, with an average of 29.6 ± 3.0 months. No wound infection, nerve damage, or irritation occurred after the operation. At the last follow-up, 15 cases of wrist pain disappeared completely, and 2 cases had mild discomfort during exercise. At the last follow-up, VAS decreased from 3.8 ± 0.7 points before operation to 0.8 ± 0.7 points (P < 0.05); grip strength increased from 15.1 ± 3.1 kg before operation to 23.2 ± 1.5 kg (P < 0.05); wrist flexion and extension, radioulnar deflection, and forearm rotational mobility increased from 116.3 ± 2.2°, 37.0 ± 3.5°, and 141.6 ± 2.2° before operation to 117.2 ± 2.5° (P < 0.05), 38.9 ± 3.0° (P < 0.05), and 142.4 ± 1.9° (P < 0.05), respectively; the modified Mayo wrist joint function score increased from 66.1 ± 3.6 points to 82.5 ± 3.9 points (P < 0.05), of which 10 cases were excellent, 5 cases were good, 2 cases were fair, and the excellent and good rate was 88.2%; DASH score improved from 37.0 ± 5.7 points preoperatively to 8.0 ± 2.5 points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The modified outside-in suture through the joint capsule to repair the superficial injury of Palmer I-B triangular fibrocartilage complex has a good clinical effect and is worthy of clinical widespread promotion.

Advancement in Arthroscopic Superior Capsular Reconstruction for Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tear.

Irreparable massive rotator cuff tear (IMRCT) was one of the causes of shoulder dysfunction, despite technical improvement, the failure rate of IMRCT was still demonstrated to be high. Traditional treatments like non-surgical treatments, partial rotator cuff repair, and tendon transfers could only achieve a slight improvement. A potential cause for high failure rate was the fact that traditional treatments cannot restore the superior stability of glenohumeral joint, and thus restricted the movement of shoulder joint severely. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) using a variety of grafts (autograft, allograft, xenograft, or synthetic grafts) provided a promising option for IMRCT. In surgery, graft was fixed medially to superior glenoid and laterally to the footprint of humeral greater tuberosity. SCR could increase the stability of the superior glenohumeral joint, decrease the subacromial pressure and acromiohumeral distance. This review summarized the relevant literature regarding the alternative grafts, surgery indications, operative techniques and clinical outcomes of SCR. we compared the different grafts, key surgical steps, the advantages and disadvantages of different surgical methods to provide clinicians with new surgical insights into the treatments of IMRCT. In conclusion, IMRCT without severe glenohumeral arthritis was the best suitable indication for SCR. The clinical outcomes were positive in the short-term and middle-term following-up. More studies were necessary to determine long-term results of this surgical procedure.

Achilles Tendon Allograft for Superior Capsule Reconstruction in Irreparable Massive Rotator Cuff Tears.

BACKGROUD: Treatment remains a challenge in massive and irreparable rotator cuff tears (RCTs), and superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) has become an increasingly popular choice. The objective of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes after SCR using an Achilles tendon allograft in irreparable massive RCTs. METHODS: From December 2015 to March 2018, 11 patients (mean age, 66.3 ± 5.8 years) with irreparable massive RCTs who underwent SCR using an Achilles tendon allograft were enrolled in this study. The range of motion (ROM), visual analog scale (VAS), clinical scores, muscle strength, and acromiohumeral distance (AHD) were measured preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months, and final follow-up postoperatively. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed preoperatively and at 6 months postoperatively to assess the global fatty degeneration index and graft failure. Ultrasonography was also conducted preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months, and final follow-up postoperatively to assess graft continuity. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 27.6 months (range, 24-32 months). The shoulder ROM at final follow-up increased significantly in forward flexion (p = 0.023), external rotation (p = 0.018), internal rotation (p = 0.016), and abduction (p = 0.011). All patients showed improvement in VAS score (p = 0.005) and clinical scores (p < 0.001) compared with the preoperative state. Pseudoparalysis improved in all patients. The AHD was 3.88 mm (± 1.21 mm) preoperatively, 7.75 mm (± 1.52 mm, p = 0.014) at 6 months postoperatively, and 6.37 mm (± 1.72 mm, p = 0.031) at final follow-up. Graft removal and synovectomy were performed in 1 patient who developed postoperative infections. Radiological failure on follow-up MRI occurred in 2 patients at 6 and 12 months postoperatively, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: SCR using an Achilles tendon allograft in irreparable massive RCTs achieved functional and clinical improvement. The use of Achilles tendon allograft also has the advantages of short operation time without donor site morbidity, sufficient thickness, and robustness; therefore, this allograft can be a useful graft for SCR.

An anatomical study of the fetal superior capsule of the glenohumeral joint.

INTRODUCTION: The superior part of the glenohumeral joint capsule has an intimate relationship with the tendons of the rotator cuff and the tendon of the long head of the biceps. One of the strategies currently proposed in the event of a massive cuff rupture is to reconstruct this superior capsule. The main objective of this anatomical study was to describe the superior joint capsule of the embryonic glenohumeral joint and its relationship to the tendons of the rotator cuff. HYPOTHESIS: The hypothesis was that this structure was an anatomical entity, morphologically identifiable from the embryogenesis of the joint (more pronounced tissue boundaries in the fetus). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In total, 101 continuous fetal anatomical sections (4 fetuses of 336mm), in the frontal plane, made it possible to identify and measure: diameters of the humeral head and glenoid, dimensions of the joint capsule insertion zone at the level of the greater tubercle, as well as the different thicknesses of this insertion zone. The ratios above the head of the biceps and against the superior labrum were also measured. RESULTS: At the level of its distal insertion on the greater tuberosity, the thickness of the superior joint capsule varies on average between 0.8mm laterally and 1.2mm next to the tendons of the supraspinatus and infraspinatus; the thickness is 0.9mm next to the middle part of the supraspinatus tendon (the "rotator cable" zone). For its insertion at the level of the glenoid labrum, the superior capsule measures 0.6mm thick on average. The capsule around the tendon of the long head of the biceps is 1.5mm thick on average. DISCUSSION: Here, we confirm the existence of this superior joint capsule, which can potentially be reconstructed. It is inserted on the greater tubercle covering 30 to 60% of its surface with variations in thickness. The joint capsule is fused to the supraspinatus tendon at the rotator cuff insertion area, preventing independent reinsertion of the tendon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV; anatomical study.

Capsular repair vs capsulectomy in total hip arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: A major complication of total hip arthroplasty is dislocation. The hip joint capsule can be incised and repaired, or can be excised. SOURCES OF DATA: We performed a systematic review of the literature following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines focusing on capsular repair and capsulectomy. AREAS OF AGREEMENT: We identified 31 articles (17 272 patients). Capsular repair produced a lower blood loss (465.2 vs 709.2 ml), and the procedure lasted 102.5 vs 96.08 min in patients who underwent capsulectomy. The patients undergoing capsulectomy experienced a dislocation rate of 3.06%, whereas in the patients undergoing capsular repair, the dislocation rate was 0.65%. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY: Most studies are retrospective observational studies, with no prospective randomized trials. GROWING POINTS: Capsular preservation is association with a lower dislocation rate and a lower blood loss. Capsular excision does take statistically less time, but it is uncertain how a 6 min difference is clinically relevant. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH: Appropriately powered randomized clinical trials should be conducted to better define the association between the chosen implants, approach and outcome.

Adverse Local Tissue Reactions are Common in Asymptomatic Individuals After Hip Resurfacing Arthroplasty: Interim Report from a Prospective Longitudinal Study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of the natural history prevalence of adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) using MRI has focused only on metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces without comparison to nonMoM bearing surfaces. QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: To determine (1) the longitudinal changes and differences in blood metal ion levels in patients with hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA), ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) THA, and metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA compared with those undergoing ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) THA; (2) how the longitudinal change of synovial reaction classification in patients with HRA, CoC THA, and MoP THA compares with those undergoing CoP THA, and whether there is an association between the presence of an ALTR or metallosis on MRI with corresponding patient-reported outcomes, or the presence of capsular dehiscence; and (3) differences in blood metal ion levels between patients undergoing HRA with an ALTR or metallosis on MRI and those with HRA without these conditions. METHODS: Between March 2014 and February 2019, 22,723 patients underwent primary HRA and THA at one center. Patients received an HRA based on their desired athletic level after surgery and the presence of normal acetabular and proximal femoral bone morphology without osteopenia or osteoporosis. Two percent (342 of 22,723) of patients were contacted to participate, and 71% (243 of 342 hips in 206 patients) were enrolled for analysis at baseline. The patients underwent arthroplasty for degenerative joint disease, and 25 patients withdrew over the course of the study. We included patients who were more than 1 year postarthroplasty. All participants had an MRI examination and blood serum ion testing and completed a Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score survey annually for four years (baseline, year 1, year 2, year 3). Morphologic and susceptibility-reduced MR images were evaluated by a single radiologist not involved in the care of patients for the presence and classification of synovitis (Gwet AC1: 0.65 to 0.97), synovial thickness, and volume (coefficient of repeatability: 1.8 cm3). Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare the mean synovial thickness, synovial volume, and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales between bearing surfaces at each timepoint and within each bearing surface over time. Marginal Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the time to and the risk of developing ALTR only, metallosis only, and ALTR or metallosis between bearing surfaces. All models were adjusted for age, sex, BMI, and length of implantation based on known confounders for hip arthroplasty. Adjustment for multiple comparisons was performed using the Dunnett-Hsu method. RESULTS: Patients with unilateral HRA had higher cobalt and chromium serum ion levels (baseline: 1.8 ± 0.8 ppb, year 1: 2.0 ± 1.5 ppb, year 2: 2.1 ± 1.2 ppb, year 3: 1.6 ± 0.7 ppb) than those with unilateral CoP bearings (baseline: 0.0 ± 0.1 ppb, year 1: 0.1 ± 0.3 ppb, year 2: 0.0 ± 0.2 ppb, year 3: 0.0 ± 0.0 ppb) at all timepoints (p < 0.001 for each time point). More patients who received an HRA developed ALTR or metallosis on MRI than did patients with CoP bearings (hazard ratio 4.8 [95% confidence interval 1.2 to 18.4]; p = 0.02). There was no association between the longitudinal change of synovial reaction to ALTR or metallosis on MRI with patient-reported outcomes. In addition, there was no association between the presence of dehiscence at baseline and the subsequent development of ALTR or metallosis, as seen on MRI. There were elevated cobalt (4.7 ± 3.5 ppb) and chromium (4.7 ± 2.6 ppb) serum levels in patients with unilateral HRA who had an ALTR or metallosis present on MRI at year 1 compared with patients without an ALTR or metallosis on MRI (cobalt: 1.8 ± 1.0 ppb, mean difference 4.7 ppb [95% CI 3.3 to 6.0]; p < 0.001; chromium: 2.3 ± 0.5 ppb, mean difference 3.6 ppb [95% CI 2.2 to 5.0]; p < 0.001) as well as for chromium at year 3 (3.9 ± 2.4 ppb versus 2.2 ± 1.1 ppb, mean difference 1.3 ppb [95% CI 0.3 to 2.4]; p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: We found a higher proportion of ALTR or metallosis on MRI in patients with HRA compared with patients with CoP, even when patient self-assessed symptomatology of those with an ALTR or metallosis on MRI was not different than the absence of these features. MRI detected ALTRs in high-function patients, emphasizing that an annual clinical assessment dependent on survey or blood ion testing alone may not detect soft tissue complications. The results of this study are in line with prior consensus recommendations of using MRI as part of a routine follow-up protocol for this patient population. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, therapeutic study.

Capsular Repair During Hip Arthroscopy Demonstrates Restoration of Axial Distraction Resistance in an in Vivo Intraoperative Testing Model.

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric models demonstrate that failure of hip capsular repair is dependent on the robustness of the repair construct. In vivo data on capsular repair construct efficacy are limited. We investigated the effect of a figure-of-8 capsular repair on hip distraction resistance relative to native and post-capsulotomy states. We hypothesized that an unrepaired capsulotomy would demonstrate increased axial distraction compared with the native state and that capsular repair would restore distraction resistance to native levels. METHODS: Patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon were prospectively enrolled between March 2020 and June 2020. Prior to any instrumentation, fluoroscopic images of the operative hip were obtained at 12.5-lbs (5.7-kg) traction intervals, up to 100 lbs (45.4 kg). Anterolateral, modified anterior, and distal anterolateral portals were established. Following interportal capsulotomy, labral repair, and osteochondroplasty, fluoroscopic images were reobtained at each traction interval. Capsular repair was performed with use of a figure-of-8 suture configuration. Traction was reapplied and fluoroscopic images were again obtained. Joint distraction distance was measured at each traction interval for all 3 capsular states. Anteroposterior pelvic radiographs were utilized to scale fluoroscopic images to obtain joint space measurements in millimeters. RESULTS: A total of 31 hips in 31 patients were included. Capsulotomy resulted in significant increases in distraction distance from 25 (11.3 kg) to 100 lbs of traction compared with both native and capsular repair states (all comparisons, p ≤ 0.017). Capsular repair yielded a significantly greater distraction distance compared with the native state at 37.5 lbs (17.0 kg; 5.49 versus 4.98 mm, respectively; p = 0.012) and 50 lbs (22.7 kg; 6.08 versus 5.35 mm; p < 0.001). The mean difference in distraction distance between native and capsular repair states from 25 to 100 lbs of traction was 0.01 mm. CONCLUSIONS: This in vivo model demonstrates that an unrepaired interportal capsulotomy significantly increases axial distraction distance compared with the native, intact hip capsule. Performing a complete capsular closure reconstitutes resistance to axial distraction intraoperatively. Future research should evaluate the in vivo effects and associated clinical outcomes of other published capsular repair techniques and assess the durability of capsular repairs over time.

Arthroscopic Tenotomy of the Long Head of the Biceps Tendon and Section of the Anterior Joint Capsule Produce Moderate Osteoarthritic Changes in an Experimental Sheep Model.

Osteoarthritis (OA) of the glenohumeral (GH) joint is a common cause of shoulder pain, resulting in considerable invalidity. Unfortunately, the study of its pathogenesis is challenging. Models of OA are necessary to identify specific targets for therapy and to be able to interfere with the development and evolution of OA. This study aims to assess the effect of an arthroscopic tenotomy of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) and section of the anterior glenohumeral joint capsule on the ovine glenohumeral joint. In addition, the authors aim to validate and evaluate the reliability of a modified semi-quantitative MRI score to assess joint degeneration in a sheep's shoulder. Eight skeletally mature sheep received an arthroscopic tenotomy of the LHBT and section of the anterior joint capsule and were euthanized four months after surgery. All animals tolerated the surgery well, and no complication was recorded for six weeks. Moderate degenerative changes to the ovine shoulder joint were found on MRI and histological evaluation. The arthroscopic tenotomy of the LHBT and the anterior glenohumeral joint capsule section caused moderate degenerative changes to the ovine shoulder joint.

Contracted joint capsule affects labral and chondral lesions in patients with frozen shoulder.

PURPOSE: Intra-articular pathologies, such as labral and chondral lesions, are common in patients with frozen shoulder. This study evaluated the correlations between the range of motion and labral and chondral lesions in patients with frozen shoulder and investigated their pathophysiologies. METHODS: In total, 125 individuals (53 men and 72 women) who underwent arthroscopic pan-capsular release between 2014 and 2020 were included in the study. The range of motion was measured using scapular fixation and true glenohumeral motion under general anaesthesia. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score and the Shoulder Rating Scale score of the University of California, Los Angeles were used to compare intra-articular pathologies. RESULTS: More than 80% of patients with frozen shoulder had labral pathologies, and nearly half of them had chondral pathologies. Labral lesions extending to the anterior rim of the glenoid had a greater range of motion and the greatest total American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score. More severe chondral lesions had a lesser range of motion, but presented the greatest function scores and the lowest strength scores according to the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California, Los Angeles. The pain scores of the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score and the Shoulder Rating Scale of the University of California, Los Angeles were not correlated with the degree of these pathologies. The traction force affected the labrum during true range of motion, and the compression force occurred on the articular cartilage during internal rotation at 90° of forward flexion during diagnostic arthroscopy. CONCLUSION: Labral and chondral lesions are common in patients with frozen shoulder. Adherence to the capsulolabral complex induced a limited range of motion and labral and chondral pathologies. Diagnostic arthroscopy with motion is an important method of reproducing the pathogenesis of intra-articular structures for patients with frozen shoulder. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Capsular Repair May Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Systematic Review of Comparative Outcome Studies.

PURPOSE: To review the existing literature in order to determine the effect of hip capsule repair on outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. METHODS: This study used Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines to find articles by using PubMed and Embase. Included studies were Level I through III studies that focused on patient outcomes as a function of hip capsular treatments: capsulotomy repair, partial repair, plication, and unrepaired capsulotomies. The Methodological Index for Non-randomized Studies was used for quality assessment of clinical outcome studies. After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 16 comparative outcome studies evaluating 2,996 hips were included; they evaluated the following capsular management techniques: complete repair (n = 1,112, 37.1%), partial repair (n = 32, 1.1%), plication (n = 223, 7.4%), and unrepaired capsulotomy (n = 1629, 54.4%). RESULTS: Of the 16 studies, 13 included patient-reported outcome scores (PROs), 3 included imaging outcomes data, and 2 reported on reoperation. Of the studies, 10 directly compared patient-reported outcomes between a capsular repair group and an unrepaired group. Of the 10 studies that directly compared PROs between a group with unrepaired capsulotomy and a group with capsular repair, 8 studies demonstrated statistically significantly better PROs in the repaired group compared to the unrepaired group, and 2 studies found no difference between the groups. Reoperation rates demonstrated mixed results between groups, and no difference was found in regard to imaging outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Midterm outcome studies suggest that capsular repair is safe and effective in patients without arthritis who are undergoing hip arthroscopy, and it may result in superior PROs compared with those found after unrepaired capsulotomy. Studies consistently demonstrate similar or superior outcomes in cohorts after capsular repair compared to unrepaired capsulotomy, and no studies reported superior results in unrepaired capsulotomy patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, systematic review of Level I through Level III studies.

Surgical Treatment of Iatrogenic Nerve Injury Following Arthroscopic Capsulolabral Repair.

PURPOSE: Case reports of nerve injuries following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair emphasize the proximity of major nerves to the glenoid. This study describes preoperative localization using nerve-sensitive magnetic resonance imaging in a small cohort of patients with iatrogenic nerve injuries following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair and the outcomes of nerve repair in these patients. METHODS: Cases of iatrogenic nerve injury following arthroscopic capsulolabral repair referred to 2 surgeons from January 2017 to December 2019 were identified. Clinical charts, electrodiagnostic testing, magnetic resonance imaging studies, and operative reports were reviewed. RESULTS: Four cases of iatrogenic nerve injury were identified. The time to presentation to our institution ranged from 2 weeks to 8 years. The axillary nerves in 3 cases were tethered by a suture at the inferior glenoid, whereas 1 case had a suture tied around the radial and median nerves inferior to the glenohumeral joint capsule. One case underwent excision and nerve transfer, 1 underwent excision and nerve repair, and 2 underwent suture removal and neurolysis. Open and arthroscopic approaches, including a recently described approach to the axillary nerve in the "blind zone," were used. Three cases demonstrated good recovery of all affected motor and sensory functions after surgery. At the 10-month follow-up, 1 case had persistent weakness, but there was evidence of axonal regeneration on electrodiagnostic testing. CONCLUSIONS: Arthroscopic capsulolabral repair places regional nerves, particularly the axillary nerve, at risk owing to their proximity to the joint capsule and inferior glenoid. Patients with neuropathic pain in the distribution of affected nerves with corresponding sensorimotor loss following arthroscopic capsulolabral surgery should undergo focused magnetic resonance imaging with nerve-sensitive sequences and electrodiagnostic testing to localize the injury. The use of multiple surgical windows to the axillary nerve in the "blind zone" enables full visualization for neurolysis, suture removal, and nerve repair or transfer. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic V.

Editorial Commentary: Acute Repair of the Acromioclavicular Joint Capsule and Ligaments and Deltotrapezial Fascia Could Allow Biological Healing of High-Grade Acromioclavicular Separation-Coracoclavicular Ligament Graft Augmentation Could Be Indicated if Time to Surgery Is Greater Than 3 Weeks.

Surgical management of chronic acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocations is a matter of controversy. In the acute setting of high-grade acromioclavicular separation, if a surgical repair of the ACJ capsule and ligaments and deltotrapezial fascia could allow biological healing of the ligaments themselves, this could be enough to restore the functional biomechanics of the joint; unfortunately, this is not true for chronic cases. In the latter situation, a surgical technique using biological augmentation such as autograft or allograft should be preferred. Time is very important for this injury, and a chronic lesion should be considered when treatment is being performed 3 weeks after trauma. The graft should be passed around the base of the coracoid or through a tunnel at the base of the coracoid itself and then at the level of the clavicle as anatomically possible to reproduce the function of the native ligaments. However, some studies have shown that passing the graft at the base of the coracoid and wrapping it around the clavicle could also achieve satisfactory outcomes. An arthroscopic technique, when used in combination, could be great to treat the associated lesions, which have a reported percentage between 30% and 49%. Finally, to restore the biomechanics of the ACJ, however, reconstruction of the acromioclavicular superior and posterior capsules together with the deltotrapezial fascia seems to be very important.

Quantitative and Qualitative Surgical Anatomy of the Acromioclavicular Joint Capsule and Ligament: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: The acromioclavicular (AC) capsule and ligament have been found to play a major role in maintaining horizontal stability. To reconstruct the AC capsule and ligament, precise knowledge of their anatomy is essential. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the angle of the posterosuperior ligament in regard to the axis of the clavicle, (2) to determine the width of the attachment (footprint) of the AC capsule and ligament on the acromion and clavicle, (3) to determine the distance to the AC capsule from the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle, and (4) to develop a clockface model of the insertion of the posterosuperior ligament on the acromion and clavicle. It was hypothesized that consistent angles, attachment areas, distances, and insertion sites would be identified. STUDY DESIGN: Descriptive laboratory study. METHODS: A total of 12 fresh-frozen shoulders were used (mean age, 55 years [range, 41-64 years]). All soft tissue was removed, leaving only the AC capsule and ligament intact. After a qualitative inspection, a quantitative assessment was performed. The AC joint was fixed in an anatomic position, and the attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was measured using a digital protractor. The capsule and ligament were removed, and a coordinate measuring device was utilized to assess the width of the AC capsule footprint and the distance from the footprint to the cartilage border of the acromion and clavicle. The AC joint was then disarticulated, and the previously marked posterosuperior ligament insertion was transferred into a clockface model. The mean values across the 12 specimens were demonstrated with 95% CIs. RESULTS: The mean attachment angle of the posterosuperior ligament was 51.4° (95% CI, 45.2°-57.6°) in relation to the long axis of the entire clavicle and 41.5° (95% CI, 33.8°-49.1°) in relation to the long axis of the distal third of the clavicle. The mean clavicular footprint width of the AC capsule was 6.4 mm (95% CI, 5.8-6.9 mm) at the superior clavicle and 4.4 mm (95% CI, 3.9-4.8 mm) at the inferior clavicle. The mean acromial footprint width of the AC capsule was 4.6 mm (95% CI, 4.2-4.9 mm) at the superior side and 4.0 mm (95% CI, 3.6-4.4 mm) at the inferior side. The mean distance from the lateral clavicular attachment of the AC capsule to the clavicular cartilage border was 4.3 mm (95% CI, 4.0-4.6 mm), and the mean distance from the medial acromial attachment of the AC capsule to the acromial cartilage border was 3.1 mm (95% CI, 2.9-3.4 mm). On the clockface model of the right shoulder, the clavicular attachment of the posterosuperior ligament ranged from the 9:05 (range, 8:00-9:30) to 11:20 (range, 10:00-12:30) position, and the acromial attachment ranged from the 12:20 (range, 11:00-1:30) to 2:10 (range, 13:30-14:40) position. CONCLUSION: The finding that the posterosuperior ligament did not course perpendicular to the AC joint but rather was oriented obliquely to the long axis of the clavicle, in combination with the newly developed clockface model, may help surgeons to optimally reconstruct this ligament. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Our results of a narrow inferior footprint and a short distance from the inferior AC capsule to cartilage suggest that proposed reconstruction of the AC joint capsule should focus primarily on its superior portion.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of the hip capsule innervation and its clinical implications.

Detailed understanding of the innervation of the hip capsule (HC) helps inform surgeons' and anaesthetists' clinical practice. Post-interventional pain following radiofrequency nerve ablation (RFA) and dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA) remain poorly understood, highlighting the need for more knowledge on the topic. This systematic review and meta-analysis focuses on gross anatomical studies investigating HC innervation. The main outcomes were defined as the prevalence, course, density and distribution of the nerves innervating the HC and changes according to demographic variables. HC innervation is highly variable; its primary nerve supply seems to be from the nerve to quadratus femoris and obturator nerve. Many articular branches originated from muscular branches of the lumbosacral plexus. It remains unclear whether demographic or anthropometric variables may help predict potential differences in HC innervation. Consequently, primary targets for RFA should be the anterior inferomedial aspect of the HC. For THA performed on non-risk patients, the posterior approach with capsular repair appears to be most appropriate with the lowest risk of articular nerve damage. Care should also be taken to avoid damaging vessels and muscles of the hip joint. Further investigation is required to form a coherent map of HC innervation, utilizing combined gross and histological investigation.