Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 302
Filter
2.
Sports Health ; 15(6): 805-813, 2023.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37139743

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: Muscles in the hamstring group are frequently injured in sporting activities. Injury prevention programs (IPPs), including eccentric training of the hamstrings, have proven to be of great value in decreasing the injury rate of hamstring muscles. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effectiveness of IPPs that include core muscle strengthening exercises (CMSEs) in reducing hamstring injury rates. DATA SOURCES: This systematic review with meta-analysis was based upon the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A systematic search was conducted for relevant studies published from 1985 to 2021 using the following databases: Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, AMED, PubMed, Web of Science, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro). STUDY SELECTION: The initial electronic search found 2694 randomized controlled trials (RCTs). After removing duplicate entries, 1374 articles were screened by their titles and abstracts, and 53 full-text records were assessed, of which 43 were excluded. The remaining 10 articles were reviewed in detail, from which 5 studies met our inclusion criteria and were included in the current meta-analysis. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 1a. DATA EXTRACTION: Two researchers independently completed the abstract review and performed full-text reviews. A third reviewer was consulted to reach a consensus if any discrepancies were noted. Details were recorded about the participants, methodological aspects, eligibility criteria, intervention data, and outcome measures, including age; number of subjects in the intervention/control group; number of injuries in each group; and the duration, frequency, and intensity of the training conducted in the intervention. RESULTS: The pooled results of 4728 players and 379,102 exposure hours showed 47% hamstring injury reduction per 1000 h of exposure in the intervention group compared with the control group with an injury risk ratio of 0.53 (95% CI [0.28, 0.98], P = 0.04). CONCLUSION: The results indicate that CMSEs incorporated with IPPs reduce susceptibility and risk of hamstring injuries in soccer players.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Soccer , Soft Tissue Injuries , Humans , Incidence , Soccer/injuries , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy/methods , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Soft Tissue Injuries/prevention & control , Hamstring Muscles/injuries
3.
Rev Med Liege ; 78(3): 160-164, 2023 Mar.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36924154

ABSTRACT

Due to its high frequency and recurrence rate, hamstring injury represents an important issue in football currently. The mechanisms of injury and the main modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors are now well documented and should allow the implementation of effective preventive strategies. In the treatment of the injured player, the physician will have to rely on a close collaboration with a quality sports physiotherapist and implement a series of key elements allowing an optimal return to the soccer field, which means at the same level of performance compared to the pre-injury period and with a minimal risk of recurrence. This article discusses these different elements in the form of a narrative review of the literature.


La lésion musculaire des ischio-jambiers, de par sa fréquence et son taux de récidive élevés, représente une problématique actuelle importante dans le football. Les mécanismes lésionnels et les principaux facteurs de risque modifiables et non modifiables sont désormais bien documentés et devraient permettre la mise en place de stratégies préventives efficaces. Dans le suivi du joueur blessé, le médecin devra compter sur une collaboration étroite avec un kinésithérapeute du sport de qualité et mettre en place toute une série d'éléments clés permettant un retour optimal sur les terrains de football, c'est-à-dire au même niveau de performance comparativement à la période d'avant blessure et avec un risque minimal de récidive. Cet article aborde ces différents éléments sous l'aspect d'une revue narrative de la littérature.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Soccer , Humans , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Athletic Injuries/therapy , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/complications , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Soccer/injuries
4.
Sports Med ; 53(4): 837-848, 2023 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36752977

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Playing football is associated with a high risk of injury. Injury prevention is a priority as injuries not only negatively impact health but also potentially performance. Various multi-component exercise-based injury prevention programs for football players have been examined in studies. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of multi-component exercise-based injury prevention programs among footballers of all age groups in comparison to a control group. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized and cluster-randomized controlled trials. CINAHL, Cochrane, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched from inception to June 2022. The following inclusion criteria were used for studies to determine their eligibility: they (1) include football (soccer) players; (2) investigate the preventive effect of multi-component exercise-based injury prevention programs in football; (3) contain original data from a randomized or cluster-randomized trial; and (4) investigate football injuries as the outcome. The risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE), respectively. The outcome measures were the risk ratio (RR) between the intervention and the control group for the overall number of injuries and body region-specific, contact, and non-contact injuries sustained during the study period in training and match play. RESULTS: Fifteen randomized and cluster-randomized controlled trials with 22,177 players, 5080 injuries, and 1,587,327 exposure hours fulfilled the inclusion criteria and reported the required outcome measures. The point estimate (RR) for the overall number of injuries was 0.71 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59-0.85; 95% prediction interval [PI] 0.38-1.32) with very low-quality evidence. The point estimate (RR) for lower limb injuries was 0.82 (95% CI 0.71-0.94; 95% PI 0.58-1.15) with moderate-quality evidence; for hip/groin injuries, the RR was 0.56 (95% CI 0.30-1.05; 95% PI 0.00-102.92) with low-quality evidence; for knee injuries, the RR was 0.69 (95% CI 0.52-0.90; 95% PI 0.31-1.50) with low-quality evidence; for ankle injuries, the RR was 0.73 (95% CI 0.55-0.96; 95% PI 0.36-1.46) with moderate-quality evidence; and for hamstring injuries, the RR was 0.83 (95% CI 0.50-1.37) with low-quality evidence. The point estimate (RR) for contact injuries was 0.70 (95% CI 0.56-0.88; 95% PI 0.40-1.24) with moderate-quality evidence, while for non-contact injuries, the RR was 0.78 (95% CI 0.55-1.10; 95% PI 0.25-2.47) with low-quality evidence. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that the treatment effect associated with the use of multi-component exercise-based injury prevention programs in football is uncertain and inconclusive. In addition, the majority of the results are based on low-quality evidence. Therefore, future high-quality trials are needed to provide more reliable evidence. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42020221772.


Subject(s)
Leg Injuries , Soccer , Soft Tissue Injuries , Humans , Exercise , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Soccer/injuries
5.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36767424

ABSTRACT

This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to investigate the effects and differences of various hamstring eccentric training protocols for the prevention of lower limb injuries, and we further propose a more refined hamstring eccentric training protocol for the prevention of lower limb injuries. A literature search for the effects of hamstring eccentric training on lower extremity sports injuries was conducted using the PubMed, Web of Science, and EMBASE databases, and the literature was searched covering the period from the date of the database's creation to 20 August 2022. A meta-analysis of the included literature was performed using R.4.21 for lower extremity injuries, injuries in various parts of the lower extremity, and subgroup analysis for exercise frequency, exercise cycle, and exercise population. A total of 23 randomized controlled trial (RCT) studies were found to be included in the meta-analysis, and 15 of these trials, totaling 14,721 patients, were determined to be included in the overall lower extremity injury prevention effect. The analysis showed that the implementation of a hamstring eccentric training program reduced lower extremity injuries by 28%, and it resulted in a 46% decrease in hamstring injury rate and a 34% decrease in knee injury rate. The subgroup analysis revealed that the frequency of exercise was most significant in the twice-a-week exercise group, that the exercise program was most effective in preventing injuries in the 21-30-week exercise period, and that the program was most effective in preventing injuries in elite athletes and amateur adult athletic populations, compared with adolescents.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Leg Injuries , Adult , Adolescent , Humans , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Muscle, Skeletal/injuries , Exercise , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Exercise Therapy/methods , Lower Extremity/injuries , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
6.
Phys Sportsmed ; 51(1): 1-19, 2023 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hamstring strain injuries are one of the most common injuries in Rugby Union, representing up to 15% of all injuries sustained. We aimed to systematically review and summarize the scientific literature that addressed hamstring strain injury incidence, risk factors, injury prevention or strengthening strategies, and strength or asymmetry measures in Rugby Union. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search to locate published peer-reviewed articles from PubMed, SPORTDiscusTM, Web of Science®, and Scopus® e-databases. Studies included were original research conducted in Rugby Union that evaluated hamstring strength, hamstring strengthening interventions, and/or hamstring injury outcomes. Included studies were quality assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met inclusion and altogether involved 2866 participants. Isokinetic testing was the most common method used to quantify hamstring strength and imbalances in Rugby Union; with data indicating that professionals are stronger than amateurs, and forwards are stronger than backs. Regarding risk factors, we identified playing position, fatigue, previous injuries, between leg strength imbalances, lack of readiness to return to play post injury, and game actions (i.e. running). There is evidence to support the use of Nordic eccentric strength measures to inform practice, with strength and imbalances useful in predicting injuries. Strengthening programs with Nordic exercises significantly increased hamstring strength, increased muscle thickness, and decreased imbalance ratios in female and male players. A significant reduction in injury incidence and severity in professional players has been observed in players performing routines incorporating progressive Nordic exercises. CONCLUSION: The etiology of hamstring strain injuries is multifactorial, with playing position, fatigue, previous injuries, leg imbalances, lack of readiness to return to play, and running actions identified as contributing factors across levels. Combining strategies to prevent hamstring injuries and recurrences, and to inform return to play, is likely worthwhile and should include Nordic strength assessment and Nordic exercises.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Leg Injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Incidence , Rugby , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Muscle Strength
7.
Phys Sportsmed ; 51(5): 463-471, 2023 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36208619

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effects of a novel multicomponent neuromuscular warm-up program on lower-extremity injury incidence in basketball players competing at the regional level. METHODS: A cluster randomized controlled experimental design was adopted to compare injury incidence between players exposed to the injury prevention warm-up program and those exposed to a typical warm-up program across an entire basketball season. Four teams consisting of 57 players (male: n = 42; female: n = 15) were allocated to the intervention group (age: 21.6 ± 2.5 years; height: 186.2 ± 8.8 cm; body mass: 80.0 ± 10.4 kg) and four teams consisting of 55 players (male: n = 43; female: n = 12) were allocated to the control group (age: 21.6 ± 2.6 years; height: 186.9 ± 9.1 cm; body mass: 81.5 ± 10.9 kg). The novel warm-up combined running exercises with active stretching, plyometrics, balance, strength, and agility drills. Coaching and medical staff provided details on injury incidence each week. Data analyses included the use of poisson regression analyses and the incidence rate ratio (IRR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: The intervention group experienced a significantly lower ankle sprain incidence rate (IRR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.98, p = 0.02) and a tendency toward a lower knee injury incidence rate (IRR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.03, 1.78, p = 0.07) compared to the control group. Considering only non-contact lower-extremity injuries of any type, the intervention group experienced a significantly lower incidence rate compared to the control group (IRR = 0.26, 95% CI = 0.05, 0.98, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: This multi-team study demonstrated a novel multicomponent warm-up program resulted in less lower-extremity injuries, particularly ankle sprains and knee injuries, compared to a typical warm-up program in regional-level male and female basketball players.


Subject(s)
Ankle Injuries , Athletic Injuries , Basketball , Knee Injuries , Leg Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Young Adult , Adult , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Athletic Injuries/etiology , Basketball/injuries , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/complications , Ankle Injuries/epidemiology , Ankle Injuries/prevention & control , Ankle Injuries/complications , Knee Injuries/complications , Incidence , Extremities/injuries
8.
J Strength Cond Res ; 37(1): 239-252, 2023 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36026481

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Sinnott, AM, Krajewski, KT, LaGoy, AD, Beckner, ME, Proessl, F, Canino, MC, Nindl, BC, Turner, RL, Lovalekar, MT, Connaboy, C, and Flanagan, SD. Prevention of lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries in tactical and first responder populations: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials from 1955 to 2020. J Strength Cond Res 37(1): 239-252, 2023-Lower extremity musculoskeletal injuries (LEMSIs) impose a significant burden on tactical and first responder populations. To determine the effectiveness of LEMSI prevention strategies, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials published in English from 1955 to 2020 (PROSPERO: CRD42018081799). MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, CINAHL, ProQuest, and DTIC databases were searched for trials that assigned military service members, police, firefighters, or paramedics to LEMSI prevention interventions with a minimum surveillance period of 12 weeks. Evidence was synthesized as odds ratios (OR) for LEMSI occurrence between individuals assigned to interventions and those assigned to standard activities. Risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2.0. Random-effects meta-analyses were conducted for (a) physical training and (b) footwear modifications to reduce LEMSI and (c) footwear modifications to reduce stress fractures specifically. Certainty in the body of evidence was determined with the GRADE approach. Of 28,499 records, 18 trials comprised of more than 11,000 subjects were synthesized. Interventions included physical training (8, N = 6,838), footwear modifications (8, N = 3,792), nutritional supplementation (1, N = 324), and training modifications (1, N = 350). Overall risk of bias was generally moderate ( N = 7 of 18) or high ( N = 9 of 18). Physical training (OR = 0.87, 95% CI [0.71, 1.08], p = 0.22, I 2 = 58.4%) and footwear modification (OR = 1.13, 95% CI [0.85, 1.49], p = 0.42, I 2 = 0.0%) did not reduce LEMSI or stress fractures (OR = 0.76, 95% CI [0.45, 1.28], p = 0.30, I 2 = 70.7%). Our results indicate that there is weak evidence to support current LEMSI prevention strategies. Future efforts will benefit from longer surveillance periods, assessment of women and nonmilitary populations, improved methodological rigor, and a greater breadth of approaches.


Subject(s)
Emergency Responders , Fractures, Stress , Leg Injuries , Humans , Female , Fractures, Stress/prevention & control , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Lower Extremity/injuries
9.
J Sport Rehabil ; 31(8): 1061-1066, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35894913

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to determine whether the inclusion of a very low volume (1 set of 3 maximal repetitions) of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program of 21 weeks induced an increase in maximal eccentric strength and whether its magnitude was influenced by the compliance rate. The secondary aim of this study was to determine whether this eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program was effective at reducing hamstring injury rate. Twenty-three professional soccer players formed the experimental group and undertook regular in-season hamstring strength training and monitoring for 21 weeks. Data from 23 players in the immediately preceding cohort (previous year) were included as a control group. The subdivision of the experimental group revealed that the high compliance subgroup (∼13 d between sessions) exhibited higher changes in maximal eccentric strength compared with the low compliance group (∼24 d between sessions; +26.5%; 95% confidence interval, 7.1%-45.9%; P < .001; g = 1.2). Five hamstring injuries (22%) were recorded in the experimental group and 9 (39%) in the control group, corresponding to a nonsignificant 2.7-fold lower risk (P = .12) of suffering hamstring injury in the experimental group. The current study demonstrates that the inclusion of a very low volume of eccentric-biased Nordic hamstring program for 21 weeks induced an increase in maximal eccentric strength (∼15%) in professional soccer players, the magnitude of which depended on the players' compliance. We also found that this program was efficient (2.7-fold lower risk), although nonsignificant, at reducing hamstring injury rate in professional soccer players.


Subject(s)
Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Resistance Training , Soccer , Soft Tissue Injuries , Humans , Soccer/injuries , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise , Muscle Strength
10.
J Sport Rehabil ; 31(8): 1067-1074, 2022 Nov 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35894921

ABSTRACT

CONTEXT: A variety of approaches have been proposed to prevent lower limb injuries in runners. However, the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions to reduce lower limb pain and injury after intensive running is very weak. OBJECTIVE: The authors performed a systematic review to investigate the effects of foot orthoses on pain and the prevention of lower limb injuries in runners. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: The authors searched the MEDLINE/PubMed, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, Scielo, and Cochrane Central (from inception to February 2022) databases for randomized controlled trials that evaluated the effects of foot orthoses in runners. The authors then calculated mean differences and 95% confidence intervals from these trials. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test. Furthermore, the authors compared the criteria between runners with foot orthoses and ones with no intervention (control group). EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Twelve studies (5321 runners) met our review criteria. The control and the foot orthoses group sustained 721 (37%) and 238 (24%) injuries, respectively. Compared with the control group, the use of foot orthoses resulted in a significant reduction in lower limb injury risk (risk ratio = 0.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.5-0.7; P = .00001, I2 = 54%; 7 studies, N = 2983: moderate-quality evidence). Moreover, the foot orthoses group corresponded to a 40% reduction in the risk of developing lower limb injuries. CONCLUSIONS: The use of foot orthoses may help reduce the incidence of lower limb injuries and pain in runners.


Subject(s)
Foot Orthoses , Leg Injuries , Running , Humans , Running/injuries , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Pain , Lower Extremity/injuries
11.
J Strength Cond Res ; 36(5): 1383-1388, 2022 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33590986

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT: Chebbi, S, Chamari, K, Van Dyk, N, Gabbett, T, and Tabben, M. Hamstring injury prevention for elite soccer players: A real-world prevention program showing the effect of players' compliance on the outcome. J Strength Cond Res 36(5): 1383-1388, 2022-The aim of this study was to determine the effect of implementing the Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) to prevent hamstring injuries in soccer. A professional team was followed by the same medical team during 5 successive seasons (2012/2013 through 2016/2017). During the first and last seasons (2012/2013 and 2016/2017), no hamstring preventive action was implemented. For the seasons 2013/2014, 2014/2015, and 2015/2016, a noncompulsory (few players refusing to participate) NHE prevention program was implemented with accurate recording of the players' training and match exposure and attendance to the prevention sessions. The first 10 weeks of the season were used to progressively increase the volume and intensity of the NHE exercises, and at the end of the season, players were split in low-, moderate-, and high-attendance groups to the prevention sessions. Overall, 35 time-loss hamstring strain injuries were accounted for. The injury incidence was 0.30 per player per season, and the injury rate was 0.95 injury/1000 hour of exposure. A nonstatistically significant higher risk of hamstring injury was observed in the control, low, and moderate attendance groups compared with the high-attendance group. The greatest risk of hamstring injury was observed in the low-attendance group (odds ratio 1.77, confidence interval 0.57-5.47, p = 0.32). Implementing a NHE prevention program has a positive effect on the injury rate in a soccer team; however, the compliance of players with such interventions may be critical for its success.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Soccer , Soft Tissue Injuries , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Humans , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Soccer/injuries , Soft Tissue Injuries/prevention & control
12.
J Sci Med Sport ; 25(3): 209-215, 2022 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34600821

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore expert opinion to identify the components of sprinting technique they believed to be risk factors for hamstring strain injuries (HSI). DESIGN: Mixed-method research design. METHODS: The Concept Systems groupwisdom™ web platform was used to analyse and collect data. Participants brainstormed, sorted and rated the components of sprinting technique to consider in a HSI prevention strategy. RESULTS: Twenty-three experts (academic/researcher, physiotherapist, strength and conditioning coaches and sprint coaches) brainstormed 66 statements that were synthesised and edited to 60 statements. Nineteen participants sorted the statements into clusters and rated them for relative importance and confidence they could be addressed in a hamstring injury prevention program. Multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis identified a 8-cluster solution modified to a 5-cluster solution by the research team: Training prescription (10 statements, mean importance: 3.79 out of 5 and mean confidence: 3.79); Neuromuscular and tendon properties (9, 3.09, 3.08); Kinematics parameters/Technical skills (27, 2.99, 2.98); Kinetics parameters (10, 2.85, 2.92); and Hip mechanics (4, 2.70, 2.63). The statement: "low exposure to maximal sprint running" located in the cluster "Training prescription" received the highest mean importance (4.55) and confidence ratings (4.42) of all statements. CONCLUSION: The five clusters of components of sprinting technique believed to be risk factors for HSIs in order of most to least important were: training prescription, neuromuscular and tendon properties, kinematics parameters/technical drills, kinetics parameters and hip mechanics.


Subject(s)
Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Running , Soft Tissue Injuries , Biomechanical Phenomena , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Risk Factors , Running/injuries
13.
J Sports Sci Med ; 20(2): 204-215, 2021 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948098

ABSTRACT

Knowledge about prevalence and etiology of running-related injuries (RRIs) is important to design effective RRI prevention programs. Mental aspects and sleep quality seem to be important potential risk factors, yet their association with RRIs needs to be elucidated. The aims of this study are to investigate the epidemiology of RRIs in recreational runners and the association of mental aspects, sleep, and other potential factors with RRIs. An internet-based questionnaire was sent to recreational runners recruited through social media, asking for personal and training characteristics, mental aspects (obsessive passion, motivation to exercise), sleep quality, perceived health, quality of life, foot arch type, and RRIs over the past six months. Data were analyzed descriptively and using logistic regression. Self-reported data from 804 questionnaires were analyzed. Twenty-five potential risk factors for RRIs were investigated. 54% of runners reported at least one RRI. The knee was the most-affected location (45%), followed by the lower leg (19%). Patellofemoral pain syndrome was the most-reported injury (20%), followed by medial tibial stress syndrome (17%). Obsessive passionate attitude (odds ratio (OR):1.35; 95% confidence interval (CI):1.18-1.54), motivation to exercise (OR:1.09; CI:1.03-1.15), and sleep quality (OR:1.23; CI:1.15-1.31) were associated with RRIs, as were perceived health (OR:0.96; CI:0.94-0.97), running over 20 km/week (OR:1.58; CI:1.04-2.42), overweight (OR:2.17; CI:1.41-3.34), pes planus (OR:1.80; CI:1.12-2.88), hard-surface running (OR:1.37; CI:1.17-1.59), running company (OR:1.65; CI:1.16-2.35), and following a training program (OR:1.51; CI:1.09-2.10). These factors together explained 30% of the variance in RRIs. A separate regression analysis showed that mental aspects and sleep quality explain 15% of the variance in RRIs. The association of mental aspects and sleep quality with RRIs adds new insights into the multifactorial etiology of RRIs. We therefore recommend that besides common risk factors for RRI, mental aspects and sleep be incorporated into the advice on prevention and management of RRIs.


Subject(s)
Lower Extremity/injuries , Running/injuries , Running/psychology , Sleep , Achilles Tendon/injuries , Adult , Attitude to Health , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Foot/anatomy & histology , Humans , Knee Injuries/epidemiology , Knee Injuries/prevention & control , Knee Injuries/psychology , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Leg Injuries/psychology , Male , Motivation , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Risk Factors , Self Report , Sex Distribution
14.
Phys Ther Sport ; 50: 1-6, 2021 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33839376

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To report hamstring prevention strategies of professional male cricket clubs in the United Kingdom, identify the application of the Nordic hamstring programme (NHP) and gain knowledge of medical teams' reasons for the NHP's inclusion or exclusion. DESIGN: Cross-sectional questionnaire. SETTING: Online survey. PARTICIPANTS: 15 (75%) of professional cricket clubs in the United Kingdom. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survey based on the RE-AIM framework. RESULTS: Twelve clubs reported having a formal hamstring injury prevention programme. The Nordic hamstring exercise and eccentric exercises (100%) were the most used interventions. Three clubs implemented the NHP, with one classed as fully compliant. Respondents partially agreed, on a 5 point Likert scale, that the Nordic hamstring exercise was effective at reducing injuries at their club (Mean 3.73 ± SD 0.70) and across professional cricket (3.87 ± 0.64). Barriers to implementation across cricket included players not positively perceiving the programme (60%) with a cultural change required (60%) for its adoption. CONCLUSIONS: The Nordic hamstring exercise is positively received by medical personnel in professional cricket in conjunction with other prevention strategies. Three clubs have utilised the NHP in the last three seasons with one club considered fully compliant. A cultural shift from players and coaches may be required for successful NHP implementation.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Cricket Sport/injuries , Exercise Therapy/methods , Hamstring Muscles/physiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Soft Tissue Injuries/prevention & control , Surveys and Questionnaires , United Kingdom
15.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness ; 61(9): 1242-1251, 2021 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33480508

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Hamstring injuries are the most prevalent time-loss injuries in sport, mainly in those modalities characterized by high-intensity and short-term actions, especially accelerations and decelerations during high-speed running. Expanding the knowledge about this type of injury and its preventive programs could be a key strategy to reduce the hamstring injury incidence. Thus, this review aimed to study the effectiveness of different preventive programs based on exercise interventions on reducing the hamstring injury incidence in athletes. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: An umbrella review was conducted through of PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Physiotherapy Evidence Database databases. The methodological quality of the included systematic reviews was assessed through the Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews 2 and the quality of the evidence was evaluated using the modified Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eight systematic reviews and meta-analysis (40 primary studies) met the inclusion criteria, which included interventions based on eccentric strength, Nordic hamstring, proprioceptive training, stretching, FIFA11 and combined programs. From the qualitative synthesizes, three studies showed that eccentric-based training programs were effective; seventeen studies reported that Nordic hamstring-based programs were effective; three studies observed that stability training-based interventions were effective; two studies indicated that flexibility were effective; three studies claimed that FIFA11+based programs were effective; and two studies reported that combined programs were effective. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise is a key strategy to reduce the hamstring injury incidence, being programs based on eccentric strength mainly by means of Nordic hamstring exercise, and on stability training, those programs which reported greater effectiveness.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries , Hamstring Muscles , Leg Injuries , Running , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Meta-Analysis as Topic , Systematic Reviews as Topic
16.
Phys Ther Sport ; 48: 128-135, 2021 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33422887

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of a futsal-specific warm-up to reduce injuries in amateur teams. DESIGN: Quasi-experimental. SETTING: Two futsal centres followed over one season using a specific report card. PARTICIPANTS: 878 teams (Intervention group, n = 458; Control group, n = 420) of both genders and three age groups (U13, U17, adults). INTERVENTION: A futsal-specific warm-up consisting of cardiovascular exercises, dynamic stretches, and game-related skills. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The incidence rate and severity of all injuries, lower extremity (LE) injuries and contact injuries. A multivariate Poisson regression analysis was used to compare between-group rates. RESULTS: The rate of all injuries was lower in the intervention group (rate ratio (RR) = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.59 to 1.06), yet not significant. There was a significantly lower rate of contact injuries in the intervention group (RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.51 to 0.98). Subgroup analysis, based on the warm-up adherence of intervention teams (low, intermediate, high), showed a lower rate of all injuries (RR = 0.52, 95% CI = 0.29 to 0.97), and LE injuries (RR = 0.32, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.81) in the high compared to low adherence group. CONCLUSION: A futsal-specific warm-up can reduce the rate of contact injuries in amateur players. With high adherence the rate of all injuries and LE injuries may also reduce.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Warm-Up Exercise , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Incidence , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , New Zealand/epidemiology , Trauma Severity Indices
17.
Scand J Med Sci Sports ; 31(4): 861-874, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33382128

ABSTRACT

The aim was to investigate the preventive effect of a complex training program based on holistic hamstring health understanding in elite professional soccer players. This study involved an elite club in Europe and was conducted over 12 seasons. The last 2 seasons were the intervention period, and the others were the control seasons. During the intervention period, players performed a complex program organized into different interventions throughout the week having as a priority the player health. Hamstring injuries, absenteeism, injury rates, and injury burden between the control and intervention seasons were compared using a rate ratio (RR) with 95% CI. Players had a mean exposure of 333.5 ± 18.6 hours per season with no significant differences between the intervention and control seasons. The overall injury rate was 3 times lower during the two intervention seasons than during the previous seasons (P < .01); the match injury rate was 2.7 times lower (P < .01) and the training rate 4.3 times (P < .01). Injury burden was almost 4 times lower during the two intervention seasons than during the previous seasons (P < .01), and recurrences in the control group were 10% vs 0% in the intervention group. Hamstring injuries were reduced ~3 times during the seasons in which elite football players were exposed to multicomponent, complex prevention training with individual approaches based on player needs, management of training load, individualized physiotherapy treatment, and planned staff communication, in comparison to the control seasons without a clearly defined and structured injury prevention intervention.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise/physiology , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Resistance Training/methods , Soccer/injuries , Athletic Injuries/epidemiology , Europe/epidemiology , Humans , Leg Injuries/epidemiology , Male
18.
J Sport Health Sci ; 10(1): 14-28, 2021 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32535271

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to review information about risk factors for lower extremity running injuries in both short-distance (mean running distance ≤20 km/week and ≤10 km/session) and long-distance runners (mean running distance >20 km/week and >10 km/session). METHODS: Electronic databases were searched for articles published up to February 2019. Prospective cohort studies using multivariable analysis for the assessment of individual risk factors or risk models for the occurrence of lower extremity running injuries were included. Two reviewers independently selected studies for eligibility and assessed risk of bias with the Quality in Prognostic Studies Tool. The GRADE approach was used to assess the quality of the evidence. RESULTS: A total of 29 studies were included: 17 studies focused on short-distance runners, 11 studies focused on long-distance runners, and 1 study focused on both types of runners. A previous running-related injury was the strongest risk factor for an injury for long-distance runners, with moderate-quality evidence. Previous injuries not attributed to running was the strongest risk factor for an injury for short-distance runners, with high-quality evidence. Higher body mass index, higher age, sex (male), having no previous running experience, and lower running volume were strong risk factors, with moderate quality evidence, for short-distance runners. Low-quality evidence was found for all risk models as predictors of running-related injuries among short- and long-distance runners. CONCLUSION: Several risk factors for lower extremity injuries have been identified among short- and long-distance runners, but the quality of evidence for these risk factors for running-related injuries is limited. Running injuries seem to have a multifactorial origin both in short- and long-distance runners.


Subject(s)
Cumulative Trauma Disorders/etiology , Leg Injuries/etiology , Lower Extremity/injuries , Running/injuries , Age Factors , Bias , Biomechanical Phenomena , Body Mass Index , Cumulative Trauma Disorders/prevention & control , Female , Gait/physiology , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Sex Factors , Shoes , Time Factors
19.
Clin J Sport Med ; 31(1): 42-48, 2021 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30550415

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To investigate adherence to a Nordic hamstring exercise (NHE) program in a real-world context of male amateur football, and the perceptions of end users (players) and intervention deliverers (coaches and medical staff) about adherence to this proven effective program. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Dutch amateur football. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred sixty-four players, 23 coaches, and 29 medical staff from Dutch amateur football teams that participated in a national randomized controlled trial 2 years earlier. INDEPENDENT VARIABLES: Nordic hamstring exercise program. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Nordic hamstring exercise program adherence during 2014 and 2015. Intervention or control group allocation during the trial, transfers, and personal perception about adherence to the program were also examined. RESULTS: Of all players, 69% reported never, 16% sometimes, 6% frequently, 5% often, and 4% always performing exercises of the NHE program. Adherence to the NHE program was higher among players who had been in the NHE arm of the previous trial and among players who had not been transferred to another club compared with players who had been transferred. Key factors in stimulating players to adhere to the NHE program were knowledge of the NHE and personal motivation. Coaches and medical staff members also mentioned personal motivation and consensus with team staff as key factors to encourage NHE adherence. CONCLUSIONS: Among high-level male amateur football players, adherence to an evidence-based hamstring injury-prevention program was very low. It is essential to recognize factors that stimulate or limit adherence to injury-prevention programs for effective programs to actually lead to a reduction in hamstring injuries in a real-world context.


Subject(s)
Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Exercise Therapy , Hamstring Muscles/injuries , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Soccer/injuries , Humans , Motivation , Patient Compliance , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies
20.
Phys Ther Sport ; 46: 155-161, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32942243

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To examine if the knowledge of scoring criteria and prior performance influence Landing Error Scoring System (LESS) outcomes. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty individuals. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The LESS was tested at Baseline and one week later under two conditions: Pre and Post information. For the Post condition, LESS items were explained to participants, as were their individual Baseline scores. Mean LESS scores and number of individuals categorized at high and low risk were compared between Pre and Post using paired t-tests and McNemar's tests, respectively. McNemar's tests were also used to compare proportions of specific LESS errors between Pre and Post conditions. RESULTS: Mean LESS Post scores (4.7 ± 1.2 errors) were significantly lower than Pre scores (6.6 ± 2.0 errors, p < 0.001) as was the number of individuals at high risk (25 vs 10 participants, p < 0.001). A significantly lower proportion of participants scored an error for the joint displacement item of LESS Post compared to Pre condition (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: When using the LESS, it is important that tested individuals have no knowledge of scoring criteria or previous errors for a valid assessment of innate jump-landing movement patterns and injury risk.


Subject(s)
Leg Injuries/diagnosis , Movement , Adult , Athletic Injuries/diagnosis , Athletic Injuries/prevention & control , Biomechanical Phenomena , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise , Female , Humans , Leg Injuries/prevention & control , Male , Mass Screening , Risk Assessment , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL