A novel measurement approach to dynamic change of limb length discrepancy using deep learning and wearable sensors.

The accurate identification of dynamic change of limb length discrepancy (LLD) in non-clinical settings is of great significance for monitoring gait function change in people's everyday lives. How to search for advanced techniques to measure LLD changes in non-clinical settings has always been a challenging endeavor in recent related research. In this study, we have proposed a novel approach to accurately measure the dynamic change of LLD outdoors by using deep learning and wearable sensors. The basic idea is that the measurement of dynamic change of LLD was considered as a multiple gait classification task based on LLD change that is clearly associated with its gait pattern. A hybrid deep learning model of convolutional neural network and long short-term memory (CNN-LSTM) was developed to precisely classify LLD gait patterns by discovering the most representative spatial-temporal LLD dynamic change features. Twenty-three healthy subjects were recruited to simulate four levels of LLD by wearing a shoe lift with different heights. The Delsys TrignoTM system was implemented to simultaneously acquire gait data from six sensors positioned on the hip, knee and ankle joint of two lower limbs respectively. The experimental results showed that the developed CNN-LSTM model could reach a higher accuracy of 93.24% and F1-score of 93.48% to classify four different LLD gait patterns when compared with CNN, LSTM, and CNN-gated recurrent unit(CNN-GRU), and gain better recall and precision (more than 92%) to detect each LLD gait pattern accurately. Our model could achieve excellent learning ability to discover the most representative LLD dynamic change features for classifying LLD gait patterns accurately. Our technical solution would help not only to accurately measure LLD dynamic change in non-clinical settings, but also to potentially find out lower limb joints with more abnormal compensatory change caused by LLD.

Anatomical leg length discrepancy in children: Can it be accurately determined using 3-D motion capturing?

BACKGROUND: Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is common in youth and is cause by several conditions. Long leg X-rays is the gold standard technique of measuring LLD. It is highly accurate and reliable compared to clinical method, but expose the subject to radiation. Instrumented Gait Analysis (IGA) serves not only as a means to measure joint kinematics during gait but also as a valuable tool for assessing Leg Length Discrepancy (LLD) while standing. RESEARCH QUESTION: The purpose of this study was to compare different methods of determining the LLD in paediatric population. We hypothesize that IGA using joint centres is more accurate and precise than the tape measurement. METHODS: Thirty-one patients with mean age 12.3 (SD=2.4) years were retrospectively included in the study. Their LLD varied between 0 and 36 mm. Three methods for determining LLD were compared to radiography using Bland-Altman analysis: 1. Tape measurement, 2. IGA, summarizing the distance from the spina iliaca anterior superior to the medial malleolus marker via the medial knee condyle marker. 3. IGA, summarizing distances between ankle, knee, and hip joints centres where the latter is calculated with different equations. RESULTS: The IGA joints method performed better than the tape measurement or IGA markers method. The equations of Davis calculating the hip joint centre had the highest accuracy with mean difference to radiography of 0.7 mm (SD=6.3). The simple Harrington method resulted in a slightly reduced accuracy but higher precision 0.9 mm (SD=6.2). The Harrington method with leg length as input was less accurate 1.0 mm (SD=6.7), but was still considerably better than the tape measurement 1.8 mm (SD=7.0) or IGA markers method 1.1 mm (SD=11.5). SIGNIFICANCE: Determining LLD with IGA using the distances between ankle, knee and hip joints centres is a feasible method that can be applied in clinical practice to calculate LLD.

[Understanding a lower limb length inequality in your child]. / Appréhender une inégalité de longueur des membres inférieurs chez son enfant.

This testimony tells the story of a little boy with leg length inequality. From his complex medical course to the long term follow-up, from the emotions felt in front of this diagnosis to the multiple arrangements of the family life, we take the measure of the tireless work of accompaniment led by his parents.

Leg length discrepancy: A systematic review on the validity and reliability of clinical assessments and imaging diagnostics used in clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: A variety of assessments to determine leg length discrepancy (LLD) is used in clinical practice and evidence about validity and reliability may differ. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review was to identify and describe the validity and reliability of different assessments and imaging diagnostics for the determination of LLD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The review was conducted following the recommendations of Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The databases Medline (PubMed) and Index to Chiropractic Literature were systematically searched. Studies regarding clinical assessments and imaging diagnostics for the diagnosis of LLD, which reported the clinimetric properties for assessment of LLD, were included and screened for methodological quality using the Quality Assessment of Studies of Diagnostic Accuracy (QUADAS-2) tool for validity studies and the Quality Appraisal of Diagnostic Reliability (QAREL) tool for reliability studies. RESULTS: Thirty-seven articles on clinical assessments and 15 studies on imaging diagnostics met the eligibility criteria. Thirteen studies on the validity of clinical assessments and six studies on the validity of imaging diagnostics had a low risk of bias and low concerns regarding applicability for all domains. One study on the reliability of clinical assessments and one study on the reliability of imaging diagnostics had a low risk of bias. Main limitations were, that an analysis of sensitivity and specificity was only performed in a few studies and that a valid reference standard was lacking in numerous studies on clinical assessments. CONCLUSIONS: For the clinical assessment of LLD, the block test appears to be the most useful method. Full-length standing anteroposterior radiography seems to be the most valid and reliable method and may be used as global reference standard to measure the anatomic LLD when comparing clinical methods and imaging diagnostics.

The intraoperative use of a calliper predicts leg length and offset after total hip arthroplasty. Component subsidence influences the leg length.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of total hip arthroplasty (THA) post-surgery and proper physiotherapy is positive recovery for the patient. Consideration is given to hip replacement biomechanics by ensuring no discrepancies in limb length (LL) and a stable prosthesis. Therefore, the patient must have proper preoperative planning and communication and a clear understanding of what to expect. METHODS: A prospective series of 59 THA operated by a single surgeon via Hardinge approach was studied, using an intraoperative calliper (CAL) to predict the change of LL and offset. We compared the results of the intraoperative changes before and after THA implantation with the reference of these values on anteroposterior x-ray pelvis. The importance of leg length balance and a good offset restoration is questioned, and the effect of component subsidence on leg length is considered. RESULTS: The average preoperative leg length discrepancy was -6.0 mm, postoperatively +3.6 mm. There was a strong correlation between the CAL measurements and the values on the x-ray (LL, r=0.873, p<0.01; offset, r=0.542, p<0.01). Reliability is better for limb length than for offset. These results are comparable within the literature and the statistical results from other studies reviewed. In addition, we evaluate the importance of subsidence of the prosthesis components for long-term results. CONCLUSION: The intraoperative use of CAL gives excellent results in predicting the final LL and offset after THA. Considering subsidence of prosthesis components, a target zone around +5 mm might be more suitable for leg length directly postoperatively. Moreover, surgeons must discuss the topic of leg length discrepancy (LLD) intensively with the patient pre-operatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 4, prospective cohort study.

Overview and Spinal Implications of Leg Length Discrepancy: Narrative Review.

Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is an underrecognized and prevalent condition among the U.S. population, with effects varying depending on the cause and size of the discrepancy. LLD occurs when the paired lower extremities are unequal in length and can be etiologically classified as functional or structural. Length differences are typically less than 10 mm and asymptomatic or easily compensated for by the patient through self-lengthening or shortening of the lower extremities. Literature review of the etiology, diagnostic modalities, clinical complications, and treatment option for patients with LLD. LLD can be assessed directly through tape measurements or indirectly through palpation of bony landmarks. Imaging modalities, specifically radiography, are more precise and help identify coexistent deformity. Once LLD has been diagnosed, evaluation for potential adverse complications is necessary. Discrepancies greater than 20 mm can alter biomechanics and loading patterns with resultant functional limitations and musculoskeletal disorders, such as functional scoliosis. Functional scoliosis is nonprogressive and involves a structurally normal spine with an apparent lateral curvature, which regresses fully or partially when the LLD is corrected. Long-standing LLD and functional scoliosis often result in permanent degenerative changes in the facet joints and intervertebral discs of the spine. Further understanding of the contribution of LLD in the development of scoliosis and degenerative spine disease will allow for more effective preventative treatment strategies and hasten return to function.

Lower-Extremity Segment-Length Prediction Accuracy of the Sanders Multiplier, Paley Multiplier, and White-Menelaus Formula.

BACKGROUND: Several methods are available to estimate leg lengths at maturity to facilitate the determination of timing of epiphysiodesis. We compared the Paley multiplier, Sanders multiplier, and White-Menelaus methods in an epiphysiodesis-aged cohort. We assessed intra- and interrater reliability for Sanders skeletal stages and Greulich and Pyle atlas skeletal age. METHODS: Actual growth was recorded in healthy, unoperated femoral and tibial segments from an epiphysiodesis database. The predicted and actual lengths were compared with use of the Paley multiplier and White-Menelaus methods, Greulich and Pyle skeletal age, and the Sanders multiplier using Sanders stages. Intra- and interrater reliability were assessed in a separate group of 76 skeletal age films. RESULTS: The cohort included 148 femora and 195 tibiae in 197 patients. Femoral length at maturity was slightly underestimated by the Sanders multiplier and staging, was overestimated by the Paley multiplier and skeletal age, and was most accurately predicted with use of the White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age. All methods overestimated tibial length at maturity. The whole-leg prediction accuracy of the Sanders multiplier and White-Menelaus formula were comparable and were more accurate than that of the Paley multiplier. For Sanders skeletal staging, the interrater reliability varied from 0.86 to 0.88 and the intrarater reliability varied from 0.87 to 0.96. For Greulich and Pyle skeletal age, the interrater reliability varied from 0.87 to 0.89 and the intrarater reliability varied from 0.91 to 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Sanders multiplier and skeletal stages was more accurate than the Paley multiplier and skeletal age in this cohort. Use of the White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age was slightly more accurate in predicting femoral length and slightly less accurate in predicting tibial length compared with the Sanders multiplier. Intra- and interrater reliability were similar between Sanders skeletal stages and Greulich and Pyle atlas skeletal age. The White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age was the recommended method for predicting lower-extremity segment lengths at maturity and epiphysiodesis effect. Although easier to recall without referencing an atlas and not sex-specific, Sanders skeletal staging does not correspond directly to years of growth remaining, and thus cannot be used with the White-Menelaus formula. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Greulich and Pyle atlas to determine skeletal age and the White-Menelaus formula to determine growth remaining are reliable predictors of epiphysiodesis effect in the lower extremities.

Dynamic leg length measurement is a valid method for detecting anatomic leg length discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: Even though the importance of leg length discrepancy (LLD), with its potential of causing several pathological conditions or gait deviations, is well known, measuring LLD is still challenging with limited reliability and validity. OBJECTIVE: To assess the capability of the dynamic leg length (DLL) measurement in detecting the presence of anatomic LLD. METHODS: A lower limb x-ray was performed on 15 participants with suspected LLD in addition to a gait analysis study using a motion analysis system to measure DLL (the absolute distance from the hip joint centre to the heel, to the ankle joint centre and to the forefoot). Average DLLs were compared between sides for symmetry by the paired t-test at 51 sample points during the gait cycle in conjunction with the differences between the sides based on the maximal stance phase and minimal swing phase DLLs. Differences were correlated with anatomic LLD by Pearson correlation. RESULTS: No significant differences in DLLs between sides throughout the gait cycle were found. Significant differences between sides were found between the maximal stance and minimal swing phase DLLs. CONCLUSIONS: DLL measurement is capable of detecting an anatomic leg length difference based on functional changes in leg length and functional discrepancy.

Novel 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis for anatomical rotation center restoration in hip arthroplasty for developmental dysplasia of the hip crowe type III: A Case Report.

RATIONALE: Exact restoration of the rotation center in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is technically challenging in patients with end-stage osteoarthritis due to developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH), especially in the Crowe type II and III procedures. The technical difficulty is attributable to the complex acetabular changes. In this study, a novel 3-dimensional (3D) printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis for anatomical rotation restoration in THA for DDH Crowe type III was developed using patient-specific Computer-aided design and additive manufacturing (AM) methods. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 69-year-old female patient had developed left hip joint pain and restricted movement for 40 years; the symptoms had increased in the past 5 months. Pain, limited motion of the left hip joint, and lower limb length discrepancy were noted during physical examination. DIAGNOSIS: The patient was diagnosed with left hip end-stage osteoarthritis secondary to DDH (Crowe type III). INTERVENTION: A 3D printed acetabulum model was manufactured and a simulated operation was performed to improve the accuracy of reconstruction of the rotation center and bone defect. A 3D printed titanium alloy integral customized acetabular prosthesis was designed according to the result of simulated operation. The integral customized prothesis was implanted subsequently via the posterolateral approach. Radiography of the pelvis and Harris score assessment were performed during the perioperative period as well as at the 6- and 12-month follow-up. OUTCOMES: The 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis matched precisely with the reamed acetabulum. The rotation center was restored and the bone defect was exactly reconstructed. There were no signs of prosthetic loosening at the 12-month follow-up. The Harris score gradually improved during the follow-up period. LESSONS: Satisfactory results of hip rotation restoration and bone defect reconstruction could be achieved by using 3D printed integral customized acetabular prosthesis, which provides a promising way to reconstruct the acetabulum in patients with DDH anatomically and rapidly for THA.

Predictor index of functional limb length discrepancy.

INTRODUCTION: Limb length discrepancy (LLD) of lower extremities is underdiagnosed due to compensatory mechanisms during locomotion. The natural course of compensation leads to biomechanical alteration in human musculoskeletal system leading to adverse effects. General consensus accepts LLD more than 2 cm as significant to cause biomechanical alteration. No studies were conducted correlating height and lower extremities true length (TL) to signify LLD. Examining significant LLD in relation to height and TL using dynamic gait analysis with primary focus on kinematics and secondary focus on kinetics would provide an objective evaluation method. METHODOLOGY: Forty participants with no evidence of LLD were recruited. Height and TL were measured. Reflective markers were attached at specific points in lower extremity and subjects walked in gait lab at a self-selected normal walking pace with artificial LLDs of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 cm simulated using shoe raise. Accommodation period of 30 min was given. Infrared cameras were used to capture the motion. Primary kinematic (knee flexion and pelvic obliquity (PO)) and secondary kinetic (ground reaction force (GRF)) were measured at right heel strike and left heel strike. Functional adaptation was analyzed and the postulated predictor indices (PIs) were used as a screening tool using height, LLD, and TL to notify significance. RESULTS: There was a significant knee flexion component seen in height category of less than 170 cm. There was significant difference between LLD 3 cm and 4 cm. No significant changes were seen in PO and GRF. PIs of LLD/height and LLD/TL were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic curve. LLD/height as a PI with value of 1.75 was determined with specificity of 80% and sensitivity of 76%. CONCLUSION: A height of less than 170 cm has significant changes in relation to LLD. PI using LLD/height appears to be a promising tool to identify patients at risk.

Temporary hemiepiphysiodesis for correcting idiopathic and pathologic deformities of the knee: A retrospective analysis of 355 cases.

BACKGROUND: Hemiepiphysiodesis is a well-established treatment option in cases of pathologic deformities and leg discrepancies during evolution. The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative angular measurement, correction correlated with age at operation time, and postoperative complication rate. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 355 patients were treated with 887 8-plates between April 2007 and January 2013. Their mean age was 12.18 years (range four to 16 years), and the mean time to axis correction was 17.32 months (range two to 62 months). We analysed the entire population and also performed subgroup analyses for idiopathic, pathologic, varus, valgus and leg length discrepancy. RESULTS: The mean durations (time from (hemi-) epiphysiodesis to implant removal) in the idiopathic and pathologic groups were 13.24 and 21.3 months, respectively. The time to implant removal was 18.39 months for idiopathic varus deformities and 11.07 months for idiopathic valgus deformities. For the pathologic deformity group it was 24.9 and 20 months in the varus and valgus subgroups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Hemiepiphysiodesis is a well-established treatment option to correct angular deformities. The rate of correction was slower and less successful in pathologic deformities and for leg length discrepancies. This suggests that earlier intervention is appropriate for these patients. A higher body mass index (BMI) was observed for valgus deformity, but no correlation was present between BMI and durability.

Limb lengthening history, evolution, complications and current concepts.

Limb lengthening continues to be a real challenge to both the patient and the orthopaedic surgeon. Although it is not a difficult operative problem, there is a long and exhausting postoperative commitment which can jeopardize early good results. I aim to review the history, evolution, biology, complications and current concepts of limb lengthening. Ilizarov's innovative procedure using distraction histeogenesis is the mainstay of all newly developing methods of treatment. The method of fixation is evolving rapidly from unilateral external fixator to ring fixator, computer assisted and finally lengthening intramedullary nails. The newly manufactured nails avoid many of the drawbacks of external fixation but they have their own complications. In general, the indications for limb lengthening are controversial. The indications have been extended from lower limb length inequality to upper extremity lengthening, including humeral, forearm and phalangeal lengthening. A wide range in frequency of complications is recorded in the English literature, which may reach up to 100% of cases treated. With developing experience, cosmetic lengthening has become possible using external or internal lengthening devices with an acceptable rate of problems.Level of evidence: V.

Improvements to a method for determining leg length following total hip arthroplasty.

Discrepancy in leg length does frequently occur as a side effect of total hip arthroplasty and may lead to reduced patient satisfaction as well as injury in the sequalae. It is consequently important to reduce leg length discrepancy where-ever technically possible. This may be achieved by recording precise intraoperative measurements and using different sized implanted components. The aim of the given study was to improve the accuracy of a previously validated optic measurement system (OMS) to reduce leg length discrepancy. This pre-existing OMS was first trialled and based on these preliminary findings developed further. Using this improved system, measurements were taken in models and cadavers. Inter observer reliability of the improved OMS was assessed. The system is introduced in the given technical feasibility study. Its accuracy was greater in the model setup (swivel joint: 772.7 ± 1.5 mm; ball joint: 770.0 ± 3.7 mm; reference: 772 mm) compared to the trial using cadaveric tissues (588.8 ± 5.7 mm; reference: 586 mm). Results of two examiners were similar. The third one measured significantly shorter values (p=.011). The results of the measurements with the OMS indicate that a significant increase in accuracy (p = 2.076×10-6) has been achieved compared to the previously reported system, however, a further improvement to measurement accuracy is necessary for this to be applied clinically.

Accuracy of leg length and femoral offset restoration after total hip arthroplasty with the utilisation of an intraoperative calibration gauge.

BACKGROUND: Offset and leg length (LL) restoration are critical for the achievement of a stable, well-functioning hip following total hip arthroplasty (THA). Several techniques are described in the literature, including a hip calibration gauge. We question whether meticulous preoperative planning of a specific surgical technique in combination with the utilisation of a calibration gauge can provide an accurate offset and LL restoration. METHODS: Retrospective review of 101 unilateral THAs via a posterior approach by a single surgeon. Preoperative radiographic LL and offset were radiographically calculated. Intraoperatively prior to hip dislocation a calibration gauge was used to measure LL and offset with a pin inserted into the iliac crest acting as a static referencing point. All had pelvis x-ray performed 6 weeks postoperatively. A literature review was conducted to establish average postoperative LL/offset values for statistical comparison. RESULTS: The average absolute postoperative leg-length discrepancy (LLD) was 2.51 mm compared to preoperatively 3.54 mm (p = 0.018). A total of 93.1% and 100% had LLD of ⩽5 mm and ⩽10 mm, respectively. The mean postoperative offset difference was 2.39 mm. The investigated LLD and offset results were comparable with literature data of studies utilising an intraoperative measuring device. LLD was significantly decreased when compared to a free-hand technique (LLD 4.42 mm, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The technique utilising preoperative templating, intraoperative offset verification together with the use of hip calibration gauge yielded accurate LLD and offset restoration as in the literature. Precise offset restoration, which often is a neglected issue, can lead to better abductor vector restoration, hip function and less pain.

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia: the outcome of a pathology-oriented classification system and treatment protocol.

Congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia is defined as a non-union of a tibial fracture that develops in a dysplastic bone segment of the tibial diaphysis. Pathologically, a fibrous hamartoma surrounds the bone at the congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia site. The cases of 25 children, who have congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia, were included in this study. Their ages ranged from 15 months to 15 years at the time of treatment. Neurofibromatosis-1 was present in 24 children. They were managed according to our classification system and treatment protocol. The treatment for mobile pseudarthrosis (types 1 and 2) included complete excision of the pathological periosteum, insertion of autogenous iliac crest bone graft, and combined fixation using intramedullary rod and Ilizarov external fixator. For type 3 pseudarthrosis (stiff pseudarthrosis), a pre-constructed Ilizarov fixator was applied for simultaneous distraction of the pseudarthrosis and deformity correction without open surgery. Evaluation of results was mainly radiological and included achievement of union, leg length equalization, deformity correction and prevention of refracture. Consolidation of the pseudarthrosis and osteotomies was achieved in all cases (100%). Refracture occurred in one case (4%) at the site of previous pseudarthrosis. Residual limb length discrepancy more than 2.5 cm occurred in two cases (8%). Valgus deformity of the ankle was present in 12 cases (48%) and was treated by supramalleolar osteotomy. Follow-up ranged from 24 to 48 months (average 36.9 months) after fixator removal. The results of our treatment protocol, based on our classification system, have been consistently good and predictable in all cases of congenital pseudarthrosis of the tibia. Mobility of the pseudarthrosis is an important factor in choosing the type of interference.

Optimizing leg length correction in total hip arthroplasty.

PURPOSE: Residual feeling of leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common cause of patient dissatisfaction following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this study is to propose a method for determining an optimal leg length correction goal in THA. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 132 patients to examine the radiographic LLD (R-LLD), perceived LLD (P-LLD), and whether or not the patient has an uncomfortable feeling about the leg length after THA. RESULTS: The residual discomfort rate in all patients was 9.1% (12/132 patients), and ten of these 12 patients felt uncomfortable due to a longer leg length. When R-LLD was within 7 mm, the rate was 6.8% (8/118 patients), which is nearly equal to the rate of 7.8% (5/64 patients) in cases in which R-LLD was within 2 mm. On the other hand, when R-LLD was 8 mm or more, the rate was 57.1% (4/7 patients). CONCLUSIONS: The results of our study show that 7 mm may be a reasonable threshold for reducing the residual discomfort. However, even with little or no R-LLD, some patients will continue to experience discomfort. We think that this is because of pre-operative differences between R-LLD and P-LLD in such cases. If the patient has a pelvic declination on the affected hip side and a lumbar scoliosis angle that is convex toward the affected hip side before surgery, the ideal length may be a little shorter than the radiographic isometry, since such patients are likely to feel a longer leg length than that shown radiographically.