Aortitis after switching short-acting granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in a lymphoma patient with HLA-B52.

Aortitis is a rare adverse event of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) treatment. Several previous studies have described recurrent aortitis caused by re-administration of the same G-CSF. However, no previous studies have examined the safety of switching between short-acting G-CSFs in patients who develop aortitis. We report the case of a 55-year-old man with refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, who developed G-CSF-associated aortitis. The aortitis was triggered by filgrastim and recurred after treatment with lenograstim. The patient possessed human leukocyte antigen B52, which has been implicated in Takayasu arteritis. In addition, a drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation test for lenograstim performed upon detection of recurrent G-CSF-associated aortitis produced a positive result. Our case suggests that switching from one short-acting G-CSF to another does not prevent recurrence of G-CSF-associated aortitis. Although the etiology of G-CSF-associated aortitis has not been fully elucidated, our case also suggests that some patients may be genetically predisposed to aortitis.

Efficacy and safety of biosimilar Peg-filgrastim after autologous stem cell transplant in myeloma and lymphoma patients: a comparative study with biosimilar Filgrastim, Lenograstim, and originator Peg-filgrastim.

Data about biosimilar Peg-filgrastim (bioPEG) in autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) are still scarce. The aim of this study has been to assess efficacy and safety of bioPEG among lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT, comparing these data with historical controls receiving other G-CSFs. Furthermore, an economic evaluation has been included to estimate the savings by using bioPEG. This is a prospective cohort study comparing lymphoma and myeloma patients undergoing ASCT and receiving bioPEG (n = 73) with three historical consecutive cohorts collected retrospectively who received other G-CSFs (Lenograstim - Leno - n = 101, biosimilar Filgrastim - bioFIL n = 392, and originator Peg-filgrastim - oriPEG n = 60). We observed a significantly shorter time to neutrophils and platelet engraftment (p < 0.001) in patients treated with bioPEG and oriPEG. Moreover, patients who received bioPEG showed a shorter hospitalization time (p < 0.001) and a lower transfusion need (p < 0.001). We did not observe any significant difference in terms of transplant-related mortality, mucositis, and diarrhea among the four groups. No serious adverse events were associated with bioPEG. Similar data were obtained after running a stratified analysis for lymphomas and myeloma separately conducted by using a propensity score matching. The average total cost per patient of bioPEG was € 18218.9 compared to € 23707.8, € 20677.3 and € 19754.9 of Leno, oriPEG, and bioFIL, respectively. In conclusion, bioPEG seems to be as effective as the originator and more effective than short-acting G-CSFs in terms of post-transplant engraftment in myeloma and lymphoma patients undergoing ASCT. Moreover, bioPEG was cost-effective when compared with the other G-CSFs.

NESC Multicenter Phase II Trial in the Preoperative Treatment of Gastric Adenocarcinoma with Chemotherapy (Docetaxel-Cisplatin-5FU+Lenograstim) Followed by Chemoradiation Based 5FU and Oxaliplatin and Surgery.

PURPOSE: Preoperative chemoradiation (CRT) is expected to increase the rate of curative resection and complete histological response. In this trial, we investigated the efficacy of a neoadjuvant CRT regimen in gastric adenocarcinoma (NCT01565109 trial). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with stage IB to IIIC gastric adenocarcinoma, endoscopy ultrasound and computed tomography-scan diagnosed, were eligible for this phase II trial. Neoadjuvant treatment consisted of 2 cycles of chemotherapy with DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil [5FU]) followed by preoperative CRT with oxaliplatin, continuous 5FU and radiotherapy (45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy, 5 fractions per week for 5 weeks) administered before surgery. R0-resection rate, pathological complete response (pathCR) rate, and survival (progression-free survival [PFS] and overall survival [OS]) were evaluated as primary endpoints. RESULTS: Among 33 patients included, 32 patients (97%) received CRT and 26 (78.8%) were resected (R0 resection for all patients resected). Among resected patients, we report pathCR in 23,1% and pathologic major response (tumor regression grade 2 according to Mandard's classification) in 26,9%. With a median follow-up duration of 5.82 years (range, 0.4 to 9.24 years), the estimated median OS for all 33 patients was not reached; 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS rates were 85%, 61%, and 52%, respectively. Among resected patients, those whose histological response was tumor grade regression (TRG) 1-2 had significantly better OS and PFS rates than those with a TRG 3-4-5 response (p=0.019 and p=0.016, respectively). CONCLUSION: Promising results from trials involving preoperative chemoradiation followed by surgery in gastric cancer need to be further evaluated in a phase III trial.

Mobilization of hematopoietic stem cells with lenograstim in multiple myeloma patients: Prospective multicenter observational study (KMM122).

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend using filgrastim or tbo-filgrastim to mobilize hematopoietic progenitor cells in an autologous setting. However, previous studies have suggested other forms of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) are equally efficacious, possibly with fewer leukaphereses required. Thus, we prospectively studied the efficacy of lenograstim, a glycosylated recombinant form of G-CSF, in multiple myeloma (MM) patients. METHODS: From November 2011 to January 2020, 98 MM patients undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) from five academic centers in Korea were enrolled. Patients were mobilized with subcutaneous lenograstim (Neutrogin®) with fixed doses of 10 µg/kg for 4 days. RESULTS: Most of the patients ( N  = 90, 91.8%) achieved at least the targets of 2 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight, and more than half of MM patients ( N  = 57, 58.2%) reached a target of 5 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight. The mobilization failure rate was 8.2% ( N  = 8). The median number of CD34 + cell/kg using G-CSF only was 5.25 × 106 /kg (range 0.49-13.47). Adverse events included transfusion (TF, N  = 53, 54.1%), bone pain ( N  = 6, 6.1%), fever ( N  = 2, 2.0%), and gastrointestinal troubles ( N  = 2, 2.0%). There were no grade 3 or 4 adverse events during mobilization. Body surface area (BSA) at mobilization and platelet TF were factors associated with CD34+ collection. Most patients achieved neutrophil ( N  = 93, 98.9%) and platelet ( N  = 89, 95.7%) engraftment. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim can safely and effectively mobilize stem cells in MM autologous settings.

IgA nephropathy diagnosed as a result of acute exacerbation due to G-CSF administration.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is commonly used to stimulate bone marrow production. G-CSF is usually safe but sometimes causes serious adverse effects and, in rare cases, exacerbates glomerulonephritis. We report a case of immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy that was aggravated by G-CSF. A 56-year-old Japanese man with no relevant medical history was admitted to our hospital as a donor of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSCs) for transplantation. To mobilize PBSCs, he received subcutaneous G-CSF (lenograstim), 500 µg for 4 days. Three days after the first dose of lenograstim, gross hematuria appeared, and after administration on the fourth day, renal dysfunction and nephrotic-range proteinuria were observed. Renal biopsy and light microscopic study revealed mild mesangial proliferation with expansion in association with the presence of cellular segmental crescents. Immunofluorescence study revealed diffuse, granular staining in the mesangium for IgA, complement component 3 (C3), and lambda light chains. We diagnosed highly active IgA nephropathy and initiated treatment with prednisolone and azathioprine. Three months later, renal function returned to normal. Screening for hidden chronic glomerulonephritis should be performed when G-CSF is administered, as in PBSC donors. Immunosuppressant therapy, such as prednisolone or azathioprine, is considered for exacerbations of highly active glomerulonephritis.

Splenic rupture following lenograstim in post-autologous stem cell transplantation treated with emergency open splenectomy: a case report and literature review.

Granulocyte-colony stimulating factors (G-CSFs) are the cornerstone of peripheral blood stem cell mobilization and apheresis. However, splenic rupture following G-CSF treatment represents a serious and potentially fatal adverse event. Here, we report the case of a patient in their late 50s with severe pancytopenia post-autologous stem cell transplantation reinfusion suffering from splenic rupture after treatment with lenograstim. We also reviewed the literature describing cases of splenic rupture during G-CSF administration.

Skin toxicity after Filgrastim treatment for an Ewing's sarcoma patient.

INTRODUCTION: Filgrastim is a granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (GSCF) used in some chemotherapy regimen to prevent febrile neutropenia. Most common reaction of filgrastim are aches and pain including headaches, nausea and skin rash. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient who developed unusual, non-commonly reported adverse toxidermy to filgrastim. At first the eruption was limited to the lower members and genetics organs. Then it slowly spread across the whole body presenting as a polymorphic exanthematous-pustulosis lesions. MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME: A cutaneous biopsy was done, identifying a toxidermy modified by systemic treatment. A pharmacological study linked the role of filgrastim to these lesions. After switching from filgrastim to lénograstim, his lesions are completely gone and haven't flared up again. Thus, clearly imputing the use of filgrastim. DISCUSSION: The cutaneous reaction that has reported with use of GSCF are sweet syndrome, erythema nodosum, pyoderma nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum. As far as we know, no acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis due to GSCF has been reported.

Lenograstim versus filgrastim in mobilization before autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in patients with multiple myeloma and lymphoma - Single center experience.

OBJECTIVE: Peripheral blood stem cell transplantation is frequently used in the treatment of various hematological malignancies after intensive chemotherapy. The primary aim of our study is to compare the amount of collected CD34+ cells and engraftment times in patients mobilized with filgrastim or lenograstim. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Demographic and clinical data of multiple myeloma (MM) and lymphoma patients who underwent autologous transplantation and mobilized with G-CSF (filgrastim or lenograstim) without chemotherapy were collected retrospectively. RESULTS: One hundred eleven MM and 58 lymphoma patients were included in the study. When mobilization with filgrastim and lenograstim was compared in MM patients, there was no significant difference in neutrophil and thrombocyte engraftment times of lenograstim and filgrastim groups (p = 0.931 p = 0.135, respectively). Similarly, the median number of CD34+ cells collected in patients receiving filgrastim and lenograstim was very similar (4.2 × 106/kg vs 4.3 × 106/kg, p = 0.977). When compared with patients who received lenalidomide before transplantation and patients who did not receive lenalidomide, the CD34+ counts of the two groups were similar. However, neutrophil and platelet engraftment times in the group not receiving lenalidomide tended to be shorter (p = 0.095 and p = 0.12, respectively). When lymphoma patients mobilized with filgrastim and lenograstim were compared, neutrophil engraftment time (p = 0.498), thrombocyte engraftment time (p = 0.184), collected CD34+ cell counts (p = 0.179) and mobilization success (p = 0.161) of the groups mobilized with filgrastim and lenograstim were similar. CONCLUSION: The superiority of the two agents to each other could not be demonstrated. Multi-center prospective studies with larger numbers of patients are needed.

Lenograstim-Induced Nodal Extramedullary Hematopoiesis: A Challenging Diagnosis in Lymphoma Evaluation With 18F-FDG PET/CT.

We report the case of a 23-year-old man with nodal EMH (extramedullary hematopoiesis) occurring during treatment for a stage IIA "gray-zone" lymphoma. Although it is often related to myeloproliferative bone marrow disease, benign etiologies such as lenograstim treatment after chemotherapy can also induce EMH and be responsible for false-positive F-FDG PET/CT examinations. In this respect, GLUT overexpression in hematopoietic lineages and macrophages of the inflammatory environment are responsible for increased F-FDG uptake. Histopathologic confirmation of new hypermetabolic lesions on follow-up PET/CT may be required when the new lesions do not conform with the treatment responses in the preexisting lesions.

Non-cryopreserved peripheral blood stem cells autologous transplantation in multiple myeloma: Bicentric study.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to evaluate the toxicity of autologous transplantation of non-frozen peripheral blood stem cells in Moroccan patients with multiple myeloma. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a bicentric retrospective study conducted in the Clinical Haematology Department of Mohammed V Military Teaching Hospital and at the Al Madina Clinic in Casablanca. The study period was from January 2015 to June 2019. All patients with multiple myeloma who had undergone an autologous peripheral stem cell transplant without freezing were included. Mobilisation was performed with lenograstim alone and the collected stem cells were stored for 24-48hours in a blood bank refrigerator at a temperature of 4°C. After standard conditioning with high-dose melphalan, the peripheral blood stem cells were reinjected 24 h following conditioning. RESULTS: Over the study period, 55 patients received an autologous transplant using non-frozen peripheral blood stem cells. The median richness of the CD34 cells collected was 4.5×106 CD34/kg (range: 2-12.2). The time required for neutrophil recovery was 12 days (range: 7-19). The time required for platelet recovery was 14 days (range: 9-32). The mortality rate within 100 days post-transplant was 3.6%. We did not observe any cases of graft failure. CONCLUSION: Our study finds good feasibility and low toxicity of autologous peripheral stem cell transplantation without freezing in patients with multiple myeloma.

Intrauterine G-CSF Administration in Recurrent Implantation Failure (RIF): An Rct.

This study investigates the effects of intrauterine G-CSF on endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in a recurrent implantation failure (RIF) group with normal endometrium. This study was designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial with the involvement of 157 RIF group pati; ents. The RIF group was formed on the basis of the RIF criteria: "The failure to achieve a clinical pregnancy after the transfer of at least four good-quality embryos in a minimum of three fresh or frozen cycles to a woman under the age of 40 years. The study sample included 82 patients in the G-CSF group who received G-CSF once a day on hCG. The procedure was performed by administering 30 mIU of Leucostim®(Filgrastim [G-CSF] 30 mIU/mL; DEM Medical, Dong-A; South Korea) through slow infusion into the endometrial cavity using a soft embryo transfer catheter. Normal saline of 1 mL was infused into the endometrial cavity in the same way in 75 patients in the control group. The standard ICSI procedure was used for all patients, and fresh cycle embryos were transferred on the third or fifth day. No statistically significant difference was identified in clinical pregnancy rates, miscarriage rates and live birth rates between the G-CSF group and the control group (p = 0.112, p = 0.171, p = 0.644, respectively), and no difference was observed between the two groups regarding endometrial thickness (p = 0.965). The intervention of administration G-CSF into the uterine cavity in RIF patients with normal endometrium, did not alter the endometrial thickness, clinical pregnancy rates, or live birth rates.

Treatment with Molgramostim (Recombinant Human Granulocyte-Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor, Rhugm-Csf, Mielogen) and Lenograstim (Granulocyte-Colony Stimulating Factor) Improves Experimental Colitis in Rats.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Treatment with growth factors could be beneficial in both inflammatory bowel disease and experimental colitis. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of Colony Stimulating Factor (CSF), and Recombinant Human (rHu) Granulocyte Stimulating Factor (GSF) in experimental colitis in rats. METHODS: Experimental colitis was induced in 62 male Wistar rats, divided into 9 groups, using 2,4,6-trinitrobenzensulfonic acid (TNBS). Group 1: Ten rats with colitis without treatment (control group). Euthanasia after 15 days. Group 2: Ten animals with colitis without treatment (control group). Euthanasia after 30 days. Group 3: Six animals with colitis. Immediate treatment with CSF. Euthanasia after 19 days. Group 4: Six animals with colitis. Treatment started 7 days after the induction of colitis. Animals were kept for 19 days. Group 5: Six animals with colitis. Treatment started 2 weeks after the induction of colitis. Group 6: Six animals with colitis, the same as in group 3. Treatment with GSF. Group 7: Six animals with colitis, the same as in group 4. Treatment with GSF. GROUP 8: Six animals with colitis, the same as in group 5. Treatment with GSF. Group 9: Six animals with colitis. Immediate treatment with prednisolone. Euthanasia after 15 days. RESULTS: CSF and GSF administration significantly improved the histological score (P < 0.05) and reduced malondialdehyde contents (P < 0.05), compared to control groups in all animals. CSF was superior to GSF and to prednisolone. CONCLUSION: Administration of both CSF and GSF could significantly improve the histological score and oxidative stress in experimental colitis in rats.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic study of lenograstim for hematopoietic stem cell mobilization: a prospective randomized study for optimal apheresis.

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the correlation between the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (lenograstim) and the impact of initiation time of apheresis on stem cell mobilization in patients with multiple myeloma. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Twenty-four patients with multiple myeloma were randomized into one of the two groups (early vs. late). Lenograstim at 10 µg/kg/day once daily was injected for at least 4 consecutive days. Apheresis was initiated 2 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the early collection group and 16 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim in the late collection group. Blood sampling for pharmacokinetics was performed within 30 minutes before, and 1, 2, 6, and 24 hours after the fourth dose of lenograstim. RESULTS: Overall, the two groups (early vs. late, n = 10 vs. 14) exhibited similar baseline characteristics including age, sex, subtype of myeloma, stage distribution, and myeloma-associated symptoms. No correlation was found between plasma lenograstim concentration and peripheral blood (PB) CD34+ cell counts or hematopoietic progenitor cells. In the late collection group, the median number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection was significantly lower (early vs. late: 2 vs. 1; p = 0.04) and there was a higher number of total collected PB CD34+ cells in a single session of apheresis (1.4 vs. 3.1; p = 0.06). There were no differences in median overall PB stem cell collection efficiency. CONCLUSION: Late collection positively impacted the number of apheresis procedures for minimal collection, with numerically improved PB stem cell collection efficiency at first apheresis in patients with multiple myeloma.

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor-associated aortitis in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report database.

BACKGROUND: Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) is the standard-of-care therapy for chemotherapy-associated neutropenia in patients with malignancies. Recent case reports have implied that G-CSF treatment may be associated with the development of aortitis, but the precise nature of the relationship is unclear. We investigated the association between G-CSF and risk for aortitis in patients with various malignancies. METHODS: We performed an observational study of 102,014 subjects with malignant neoplasms documented in the Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report (JADER) database between April 2004 and February 2018. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for aortitis in patients treated and not treated with G-CSF were estimated using multivariate logistic regression with R software. RESULTS: Among the 102,014 subjects, 25 developed aortitis. Of the 3409 and 98,630 subjects treated and not treated with G-CSF, 16 (0.47% [95% CI; 0.27, 0.76]) and 9 (0.01% [0.00, 0.02]) developed aortitis, respectively. Multivariate logistic regression indicated an association between G-CSF and aortitis (adjusted OR 45.87 [19.16, 109.8], p < 0.001). The values for filgrastim, pegfilgrastim, and lenograstim were 0.25% (0.07, 0.63), 1.58% (0.79, 2.81), and 0.24% (0.05, 0.69), respectively. CONCLUSION: G-CSF treatment was associated with a signal of increased risk for aortitis among patients with malignant neoplasms. Three different G-CSF agents were associated with such risk, implying that it is a class effect. However, we do not recommend changing G-CSF prescriptions, because our results may have been influenced by the limitations of the JADER database and because the benefit of G-CSF treatment outweighs the potential risk.

Lenograstim 5 µg/kg is not superior to biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg in lymphoma patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization after chemotherapy: preliminary results from a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Randomized trials comparing chemomobilization efficiency between lenograstim and biosimilar filgrastim are lacking. Our previous retrospective study suggested that lenograstim could be more effective than biosimilar filgrastim when used at the same conventional dosage (5 µg/kg) only in lymphoma patients undergoing peripheral blood stem cell mobilization. We planned a prospective randomized study comparing lenograstim 5 µg/kg with biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg to verify the hypothesis of lenograstim superiority even at half the dosage (stress test). Herein we report data after enrolling 60% of planned patients. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: From October 2014 to November 2017, a total of 42 of 70 planned patients with lymphoma were randomly assigned to receive lenograstim 5 µg/kg (21) or biosimilar filgrastim 10 µg/kg (21). Patients were stratified according to treatment line at the time of mobilization (1 or ≥2). Primary endpoint was the rate of achievement of the CD34+ cell collection target dose (≥ 4 × 106 /kg). An improvement by 23% was expected to validate the hypothesis of lenograstim superiority. RESULTS: The two cohorts were balanced for all the baseline features. We observed an identical rate of patients able to reach the targeted CD34+ cell dose and of mobilization failures (90.4 and 4.8% in both cohorts) and a perfect equivalence in any of the secondary collection outcomes. The hypothesis of lenograstim superiority was not corroborated at interim analysis. CONCLUSION: Lenograstim at conventional dosage has failed to demonstrate its superiority over biosimilar filgrastim at double the dosage at interim analysis in their first head-to-head trial.

Effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim vs. original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors in febrile neutropenia prevention in breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to describe the effectiveness of biosimilar filgrastim and original granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), lenograstim and pegfilgrastim, in febrile neutropenia (FN) prevention in breast cancer patients receiving docetaxel/doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide (TAC) as adjuvant/neoadjuvant treatment and to analyze their treatment patterns. METHODS: A pharmacoepidemiology cohort study was developed in a university hospital (with 23 healthcare centers) with retrospective data collection (2012-2014). Effectiveness of G-CSFs was assessed by the FN incidence. Other parameters analyzed were as follows: moderate and severe neutropenia incidence, neutropenia-related hospitalizations, dosage, and duration. Data was analyzed using each cycle as a unit of analysis. RESULTS: We identified 98 patients representing 518 chemotherapy cycles, 215 with original G-CSFs (35 lenograstim and 180 pegfilgrastim) and 303 with biosimilar filgrastim. The FN incidence was similar in both groups (3.7% original vs. 3.3% biosimilar; p = 0.79). No statistically significant differences were found in moderate and severe neutropenia incidence (4.7 vs. 6.3%; p = 0.43) or neutropenia-related hospitalizations (3.3 vs. 3.6%; p = 0.19). When the three drugs were evaluated separately, a higher FN incidence was observed with lenograstim than with pegfilgratim or biosimilar (p = 0.024). The dosage and duration of biosimilar were lower than lenograstim (4.9 vs. 5.7 µg/kg/day; 5 vs. 7 days; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: An abbreviated 5-day course of biosimilar filgrastim provided optimal primary prophylaxis against FN post-chemotherapy TAC in patients with breast cancer. The clinical relevance of the highest FN incidence in the lenograstim cohort needs further attention.

Biosimilar filgrastim (leucostim®) have similar efficacy in steady-state hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization compared to original filgrastim (neupogen®) and lenograstim (granocyte®): A retrospective multicenter study.

Biosimilar filgrastim (Leucostim®) was shown to be similar in terms of efficacy and safety in hematopoietic progenitor cell mobilization (HPCM) compared to originator filgrastim (Neupogen®) and lenograstim (Granocyte®) in healthy donors and chemomobilization settings. Here we report our retrospective experience with Leucostim® (n: 43) compared to Neupogen® (n: 71) and Granocyte® (n: 32) in steady-state mobilization of patients presenting with Hodgkin lymphoma, non-Hodgkin lymphoma and multiple myeloma. The median age of patients on Leucostim® (56) arm was significantly higher compared to patients who received Neupogen® (50) and Granocyte® (49) (p: 0.039). Patients who underwent HPCM with Leucostim® received less chemotherapy lines (p: 0.026) and courses (p: 0.046) compared to others. Otherwise the study cohort was homogenous in terms of gender, primary diagnosis and various risk factors for mobilization failure. Mobilization failure was defined as failure to achieve a minimum threshold (10/µL) for peripheral blood CD34+ cell concentration to initiate leukapheresis or 0.5×106/kg, 0.8×106/kg and 2×106/kg CD34+ cells in first, second and fourth days of apheresis, respectively. The study groups were similar in terms of median number of CD34+ progenitor cell yield (×106/kg) (Neupogen®: 6.18, Granocyte®: 6.2 and Leucostim®: 6.2) (p: 0.959) and median number of leukapheresis sessions (p: 0.615). The treatment arms were also similar in terms of mobilization failure (Neupogen® 11.3% - Granocyte® 21.9% - Leucostim® 16.3%; p: 0.366). No patient experienced any severe adverse effect during HPCM. Leucostim® is equally effective and safe in HPCM compared to originator G-CSF (Neupogen®) and lenograstim (Granocyte®) in steady-state HPCM setting.

Fludarabine, cytarabine, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor and idarubicin for relapsed childhood acute myeloid leukemia.

BACKGROUND: The combination of fludarabine (Flu), high-dose cytarabine (Ara-C) and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; FLAG), with anthracyclines has become standard chemotherapy for refractory acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in European children and adults. To clarify the efficacy and the safety of FLAG-idarubicin (IDA) for children prospectively, we planned a multicenter phase II study (AML-R11) by the Japanese Pediatric Leukemia/Lymphoma Study Group. METHODS: Patients with AML aged between 2 and 20 years old, who had the first bone marrow (BM) relapse or induction failure, were enrolled. The FLAG-IDA regimen consisted of Flu 30 mg/m2 for 5 days, Ara-C 2 g/m2 for 5 days, G-CSF (lenograstim) 5 µg/kg for 6 days and IDA 10 mg/m2 for 3 days. The primary endpoint was remission rate after therapy. RESULTS: Due to drug supply issues, the trial was suspended after the inclusion of seven eligible patients. There were six cases of early relapse within 1 year of the first remission. All seven patients completed the therapy and no early death was observed. Hematological toxicity was common, and one patient developed grade 4 non-hematological toxicity of bacterial meningitis. Although only one patient with late relapse achieved complete remission, minimal residual disease was positive on both flow cytometry and Wilms' tumor 1 mRNA. Two patients were alive in remission following hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, whereas the other five patients died of either the disease or treatment-related causes. CONCLUSION: FLAG-IDA might be tolerable for children with refractory AML although the efficacy should be further investigated.