Perfil de prescripción de levetiracetam en niños menores de cuatro años atendidos en un hospital de alta complejidad de Chile / Levetiracetam prescription profile in children younger than 4 years treated at a tertiary care hospital in Chile

Introducción. El levetiracetam (LEV) es un antiepiléptico aprobado por el Instituto de Salud Pública de Chile como terapia concomitante en crisis epilépticas en niños mayores de cuatro años. Sin embargo, es ampliamente indicado desde el periodo neonatal, lo que hace necesario evaluar su utilización fuera de ficha técnica. Objetivo. Determinar el perfil de prescripción-indicación de LEV en el tratamiento de las crisis epilépticas en menores de cuatro años en un hospital de alta complejidad del sur de Chile. Población y método. Estudio observacional, descriptivo y retrospectivo. Se revisaron las historias clínicas de quienes iniciaron tratamiento con LEV entre 2014 y 2019, y se recopilaron datos sobre variables sociodemográficas, farmacológicas y clínicas. El análisis se basó en la descripción del perfil de los pacientes, prescripción, seguimiento y seguridad. Resultados. Se incluyeron 68 pacientes: 40 (58,8 %) de sexo masculino, 49 (72,1 %) con edad gestacional ≥ 37 semanas. La etiología principal de la epilepsia fue de tipo estructural (35,3 %); el LEV se utilizó principalmente en niños diagnosticados con malformación del sistema nervioso central (17,6 %) y predominó la monoterapia (55,9 %). En el 50 % se usó LEV para crisis focales. Cinco niños (7,3 %) presentaron trastornos de tipo psiquiátrico clasificados como probables reacciones adversas al medicamento. Conclusión. El LEV se utilizó en niños con diferentes diagnósticos con baja frecuencia de eventos adversos. El perfil de utilización varió en los diferentes grupos etarios. Es necesario identificar en futuros estudios la efectividad especialmente en el recién nacido y en epilepsias refractarias.

Introduction. Levetiracetam (LEV) is an antiepileptic drug approved by the Chilean Institute of Public Health as concomitant therapy for epileptic seizures in children older than 4 years of age. However, it is widely prescribed from the neonatal period, which makes it necessary to evaluate its off-label use. Objective. To determine the prescription-indication profile of LEV in the treatment of epileptic seizures in children younger than 4 years in a tertiary care hospital in southern Chile. Population and method. Observational, descriptive, and retrospective study. The medical records of patients who started treatment with LEV between 2014 and 2019 were reviewed, and data on sociodemographic, pharmacological, and clinical variables were collected. The analysis was based on the description of the profile of patients, prescriptions, follow-up, and safety. Results. A total of 68 patients were included: 40 (58.8%) were males, 49 (72.1%) were born at a gestational age ≥ 37 weeks. The main etiology of epilepsy was structural (35.3%); LEV was mostly used in children diagnosed with central nervous system malformation (17.6%), and monotherapy was the prevailing dosage (55.9%). LEV was used for focal seizures in 50% of cases. Five children (7.3%) had psychiatric disorders, classified as probable adverse drug reactions. Conclusion. LEV was used in children with various diagnoses, with a low rate of adverse events. The profile of drug use varied in the different age groups. Future studies are needed to identify effectiveness, especially in newborn infants and patients with refractory epilepsy.

Factors influencing serum concentrations of levetiracetam in dogs with epilepsy.

BACKGROUND: Factors affecting serum concentrations of levetiracetam in dogs are unknown and could affect the efficacy of levetiracetam in controlling seizures in dogs with epilepsy. HYPOTHESIS/OBJECTIVES: Higher PO doses of levetiracetam will be needed in dogs to achieve serum concentrations shown to be effective in humans. Determine factors that could influence serum levetiracetam concentrations and justify dose adjustment in some epileptic dogs. ANIMALS: Sixty-nine client-owned dogs with epilepsy treated with levetiracetam alone or in combination, based on 127 trough serum concentration measurements of levetiracetam. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study. Linear mixed models were used to assess the effect of patient signalment and concurrent drug administration on serum concentrations of levetiracetam and the effect of serum concentration of levetiracetam on seizure frequency reduction. RESULTS: The PO dose of levetiracetam significantly explained changes in serum levetiracetam concentration, and this causal link was stronger with monotherapy (R2 = 0.59, P < .001). Phenobarbital significantly decreased serum levetiracetam concentration in a dose dependent manner (R2 = 0.30, P = .003). Based on our model, a levetiracetam dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day is necessary to obtain a serum levetiracetam concentration of 20 µg/mL when used alone or concurrently with 7 mg/kg/day of phenobarbital. No other factors were found to influence serum levetiracetam concentrations. No therapeutic range could be identified. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Our data suggest that a dosage of 99-216 mg/kg/day of levetiracetam is needed to achieve a serum concentration known to be therapeutically effective in humans, especially when administered concomitantly with phenobarbital.

Trends in Antiseizure Medication Initiation, Switch, or Termination in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Epilepsy: A Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Few studies evaluate physicians' choice of antiseizure medication (ASM) to treat patients with newly diagnosed epilepsy. The objective of this study was to analyze the choice of ASM and its use by age, sex, psychiatric comorbidities, and concurrent treatment with other drugs (antidepressant medications and contraceptives) in patients who initiated epilepsy treatment using monotherapy. METHODS: Included in this study were persons (any age) with an incident hospital diagnosis of epilepsy during 2010-2022 in the Swedish Patient Register (SPR), preceding a first dispensing of any ASM (as reported in the Swedish Prescribed Drug Register, SPDR) for the period 2010-2022. Incident patients were identified using retrospective information during 2000-2009 in the SPR. Primary outcome was first dispensed ASM by age, sex, comorbidity, and comedication with antidepressants or contraceptives (SPDR). Secondary outcomes were time to ASM switch or termination assessed by survival analyses. RESULTS: Of 67,984 patients included (mean age 46; 46% female), 66,441 initiated ASM treatment using monotherapy. Relative risk (RR) for initiating treatment using monotherapy did not differ between age groups, sex, or patients with concurrent treatment with antidepressants, contraceptives, or psychiatric illness (RR and 95% CI did include 1.0). The share initiating treatment using levetiracetam increased from 10% in 2010 to 55% in 2022; valproic acid: 10%-5%. The likelihood of initiating treatment using 1 of the 5 most frequent ASMs differed between all compared groups (0.3 < RR < 1; 95% CI < 1; 1 < RR < 15; 1 <95% CI). Seven percent of female patients of childbearing age initiated treatment with valproic acid, levetiracetam was the most frequent initial ASM in patients with psychiatric comorbidity (40.2%), and lamotrigine the most prescribed initial ASM to women on contraceptives (50.4%). Highest likelihoods of treatment termination were found among children (1.72 < RR < 3.07; 1 <95% CI) and among patients with psychiatric comorbidity (initiated on carbamazepine, RR 1.38; 1 <95% CI or lamotrigine, RR 1.31; 1 <95% CI). Thirty-one percent to 47% of patients switched from an initial monotherapy to a new monotherapy within 5 years. Twenty percent to 42% terminated ASM treatment within 5 years. DISCUSSION: Levetiracetam and lamotrigine were the most frequently dispensed initial ASMs, also among patients with comorbidities or comedications complicating the use of these ASMs, highlighting the need for improved education of prescribers concerning ASM selection in relation to individual patient characteristics. Use of ASMs in hospital is not captured in the SPDR.

Efficacy of second-line anticonvulsant agents with adult status epilepticus: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Status epilepticus (SE) is potentially life-threatening, however, it is unclear which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) should be used as second-line AEDs. OBJECTIVE: We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing multiple second-line AEDs for SE to investigate the efficacy of AEDs. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, CENTRAL, ClinicalTrials.gov, and World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Search Portal and included RCTs for patients aged ≥15 years with SE on December 31, 2023. We compared multiple second-line AEDs for SE including fosphenytoin (fPHT), lacosamide (LCM), levetiracetam (LEV), phenytoin (PHT), phenobarbital (PHB), and valproate (VPA). The primary and secondly outcomes were termination of seizures integrating the absence of seizure recurrence at 30 min and 60 min, and adverse events associated with AEDs, respectively, with expressing as relative risk (RR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). We conducted a NMA using frequentist-based approach with multivariate random effects, and assessed the certainty based on the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations framework. RESULTS: Seven RCTs (n = 780) were included, and statistically significant difference was detected between VPA vs. PHB (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.53-0.85; very low certainty), fPHT vs. PHB (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.90; very low certainty), LCM vs. PHB (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.41-0.93; very low certainty), and LEV vs. PHB (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.51-0.94; very low certainty). Moreover, PHB was the highest in the ranking for termination of seizures. For adverse events, no significant reduction was observed owing to the selection of AEDs, although the ranking of PHB was the lowest. CONCLUSIONS: PHB may have been the most effective for seizure termination as second-line AEDs in adult patients with SE. However, the certainty of almost all comparisons was "very low", and careful interpretation is essential.

Efficacy and tolerability of levetiracetam in people with and without intellectual disabilities: A naturalistic case control study.

INTRODUCTION: People with Intellectual Disabilities (PwID) are twenty times more likely than general population to have epilepsy. Guidance for prescribing antiseizure medication (ASM) to PwID is driven by trials excluding them. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a first-line ASM in the UK. Concerns exist regarding LEV's behavioural and psychological adverse effects, particularly in PwID. There is no high-quality evidence comparing effectiveness and adverse effects in PwID to those without, prescribed LEV. METHODS: Pooled casenote data for patients prescribed LEV (2000-2020) at 18 UK NHS Trusts were analysed. Demographics, starting and maximum dose, adverse effects, dropouts and seizure frequency between ID (mild vs. moderate-profound (M/P)) and general population for a 12-month period were compared. Descriptive analysis, Mann-Whitney, Fisher's exact and logistic regression methods were employed. RESULTS: 173 PwID (mild 53 M/P 120) were compared to 200 without ID. Mean start and maximum dose were similar across all groups. PwID (Mild & M/P) were less likely to withdraw from treatment (P = 0.036). No difference was found between ID and non-ID or between ID groups (Mild vs M/P) in LEV's efficacy i.e. >50 % seizure reduction. Significant association emerged between ID severity and psychiatric adverse effects (P = 0.035). More irritability (14.2 %) and aggression (10.8 %) were reported in M/P PwID. CONCLUSION: PwID and epilepsy have high rates of premature mortality, comorbidities, treatment resistance and polypharmacy but remain poorly researched for ASM use. This is the largest studied cohort of PwID trialled on LEV compared to general population controls. Findings support prescribing of LEV for PwID as a first-line ASM.

Serum perampanel levels in patients with seizures are not affected by hemodialysis.

Perampanel belongs to a novel class of antiseizure medications (ASMs). Studies examining the effect of hemodialysis on perampanel serum levels in clinical settings are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the changes in serum perampanel levels during hemodialysis. We studied patients with seizures who received oral perampanel between April 2020 and March 2023 and whose serum concentration of perampanel was measured before and after hemodialysis. We analyzed the serum concentrations of levetiracetam and lacosamide for comparison. Fourteen patients, with a mean age of 76.1 ± 7.88 years, were included. The dose of perampanel was 2.14 ± 1.27 mg. The hemodialysis clearance rate of perampanel, levetiracetam, and lacosamide was 0 ± 13%, 69 ± 11%, and 59.6 ± 8.2%, respectively. The post-dialysis CD ratio decreased significantly with levetiracetam but not with perampanel. Adverse but acceptable effects of perampanel were observed in two patients. The serum concentrations of several ASMs have been shown to be reduced during hemodialysis. Our study revealed that the serum perampanel concentration does not decrease during hemodialysis. Owing to the low rate of adverse effects and the stability of perampanel serum concentration during hemodialysis, perampanel could be a favorable choice as an ASM for patients with seizures undergoing hemodialysis. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: Our study looked at how hemodialysis affects the serum levels of perampanel, a new type of medication for seizures. In 14 patients who started treatment between April 2020 and March 2023, perampanel serum levels did not decrease during hemodialysis, unlike other seizure medications. This shows that perampanel can be a good option for patients with seizures who need hemodialysis, with fewer side effects compared to other medications.

Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Levetiracetam in Different Trimesters of Pregnant Women with Epilepsy in a Tertiary Care Center: A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Levetiracetam is the most commonly used antiepileptic drug in pregnant women due to its low teratogenic risk profile, favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics, and safety profile. Serum levels of levetiracetam vary in epilepsy during pregnancy. Therefore, the aim of the study was to evaluate the serum levels of levetiracetam during different trimesters of pregnancy by using therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-center, prospective study. Pregnant women with epilepsy on levetiracetam were enrolled after getting written informed consent from them. Serum trough levels of levetiracetam were estimated at all trimesters by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). RESULTS: The study included 16 participants with mean ± standard deviation (SD) age of 27.75 ± 4 years. There were nine (56.2%) participants with generalized seizure disorder and seven (43.8%) participants of focal seizure disorder. Among 16 patients, 10 (62.5%) participants were on levetiracetam alone and six (37.5%) participants were on levetiracetam combined with other antiepileptic drugs. In a total of 48 trough samples, 45 sample concentrations were below the therapeutic range of 12-46 mg/l and three sample concentrations were within the therapeutic range. There was a statistically significant difference in the concentration-dose ratio (CDR) of levetiracetam between the third and first trimesters (P-value 0.018). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in serum levetiracetam concentration between the third and first trimesters. A well-conducted, intensive pharmacokinetic sampling study in PWWE with a control group is needed in future to evaluate the whole pharmacokinetic profile of levetiracetam and to correlate the clinical outcome.

Levetiracetam or Phenytoin as Prophylaxis for Status Epilepticus: Secondary Analysis of the "Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury Trial" (ADAPT) Dataset, 2014-2017.

OBJECTIVES: To compare levetiracetam and phenytoin as prophylaxis for the short-term development of status epilepticus (SE) during care of pediatric patients with acute severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). DESIGN: Nonprespecified secondary analysis using propensity score matching. SETTING: We used the Approaches and Decisions in Acute Pediatric TBI Trial (ADAPT NCT04077411) dataset (2014-2017). SUBJECTS: Patients less than 18 years old with Glasgow Coma Scale Score less than or equal to 8 who received levetiracetam or phenytoin as a prophylactic anticonvulsant therapy. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS: Of the 516 total patients who qualified for the case-control study, 372 (72.1%) patients received levetiracetam, and 144 (27.9%) received phenytoin. After propensity score matching, the pair-matched analysis with 133 in each group failed to identify an association between levetiracetam versus phenytoin use and occurrent of SE (3.8% vs. 0.8%, p = 0.22), or mortality (i.e., in-hospital, 30-d and 60-d). However, on closer inspection of the statistical testing, we cannot exclude the possibility that selecting levetiracetam rather than phenytoin for prophylaxis was associated with the following: up to a mean difference of 7.3% greater prevalence of SE; up to a mean difference of 13.9%, 12.1%, and 13.9% greater mortality during the hospital stay, and 30-, and 60-days after hospital arrival, respectively. Last, analysis of 6 months Glasgow Outcome Scale Extended score in those without premorbid comorbidities, there was an association between favorable outcomes and use of phenytoin rather than levetiracetam prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: In ADAPT, the decision to use prophylactic levetiracetam versus phenytoin failed to show an association with occurrence of subsequent SE, or mortality. However, we are unable to exclude the possibility that selecting levetiracetam rather than phenytoin for prophylaxis was associated with greater prevalence of SE and mortality. We are unable to make any recommendation about one prophylactic anticonvulsant medication over the other, but recommend that further larger, contemporary studies in severe pediatric TBI are carried out.

Structural basis for antiepileptic drugs and botulinum neurotoxin recognition of SV2A.

More than one percent of people have epilepsy worldwide. Levetiracetam (LEV) is a successful new-generation antiepileptic drug (AED), and its derivative, brivaracetam (BRV), shows improved efficacy. Synaptic vesicle glycoprotein 2a (SV2A), a putative membrane transporter in the synaptic vesicles (SVs), has been identified as a target of LEV and BRV. SV2A also serves as a receptor for botulinum neurotoxin (BoNT), which is the most toxic protein and has paradoxically emerged as a potent reagent for therapeutic and cosmetic applications. Nevertheless, no structural analysis on AEDs and BoNT recognition by full-length SV2A has been available. Here we describe the cryo-electron microscopy structures of the full-length SV2A in complex with the BoNT receptor-binding domain, BoNT/A2 HC, and either LEV or BRV. The large fourth luminal domain of SV2A binds to BoNT/A2 HC through protein-protein and protein-glycan interactions. LEV and BRV occupy the putative substrate-binding site in an outward-open conformation. A propyl group in BRV creates additional contacts with SV2A, explaining its higher binding affinity than that of LEV, which was further supported by label-free spectral shift assay. Numerous LEV derivatives have been developed as AEDs and positron emission tomography (PET) tracers for neuroimaging. Our work provides a structural framework for AEDs and BoNT recognition of SV2A and a blueprint for the rational design of additional AEDs and PET tracers.

Anti-epileptic drug use during adjuvant chemo-radiotherapy is associated with poorer survival in patients with glioblastoma: A nationwide population-based cohort study.

INTRODUCTION: There are emerging but inconsistent evidences about anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) as radio- or chemo-sensitizers to improve survival in glioblastoma patients. We conducted a nationwide population-based study to evaluate the impact of concurrent AED during post-operative chemo-radiotherapy on outcome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 1057 glioblastoma patients were identified by National Health Insurance Research Database and Cancer Registry in 2008-2015. Eligible criteria included those receiving surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy and temozolomide, and without other cancer diagnoses. Survival between patients taking concurrent AED for 14 days or more during chemo-radiotherapy (AED group) and those who did not (non-AED group) were compared, and subgroup analyses for those with valproic acid (VPA), levetiracetam (LEV), or phenytoin were performed. Multivariate analyses were used to adjust for confounding factors. RESULTS: There were 642 patients in the AED group, whereas 415 in the non-AED group. The demographic data was balanced except trend of more patients in the AED group had previous drug history of AEDs (22.6% vs. 18%, P 0.078). Overall, the AED group had significantly increased risk of mortality (HR = 1.18, P 0.016) compared to the non-AED group. Besides, an adverse dose-dependent relationship on survival was also demonstrated in the AED group (HR = 1.118, P 0.0003). In subgroup analyses, the significant detrimental effect was demonstrated in VPA group (HR = 1.29,P 0.0002), but not in LEV (HR = 1.18, P 0.079) and phenytoin (HR = 0.98, P 0.862). CONCLUSIONS: Improved survival was not observed in patients with concurrent AEDs during chemo-radiotherapy. Our real-world data did not support prophylactic use of AEDs for glioblastoma patients.

Effectiveness of Levetiracetam versus phenytoin in preventing seizure in traumatic brain injury patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and the subsequent Post-traumatic seizure (PTS) is a growing public health concern. Generally, anti-seizure drugs (ASDs) are recommended for PTS prophylaxis and treatment. This meta-analysis aimed to review the current state of knowledge and the evidence for the efficacy and safety of Levetiracetam (LEV) on the incidence of seizure in TBI patients compared to Phenytoin (PHT). METHODS: A search was carried out based on PubMed, MEDLINE, Europe PMC database, and Cochrane Library up to November 2023. A total of 16 studies (3 randomized clinical trials, 10 retrospective cohort studies, and 3 prospective cohort studies) including 5821 TBI patients included in our meta-analysis. We included studies comparing LEV and PHT after brain injury in both adults and children. Risk of bias assessment was done for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a risk-of-bias tool (RoB-2) and the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of cohort studies. Two RCTs in our meta-analysis had a high risk of bias, therefore we applied sensitivity analysis to evaluate the robustness of our results. RESULTS: The most commonly reported dosage for LEV was 500 mg twice daily and for PHT it was 5 mg/kg. There was no significant difference between LEV and PHT groups in reducing the early seizure incidence (OR = 0.85; 95% CI = [0.60, 1.21]; p = 0.375, fixed-effect, I2 = 21.75%). The result of sensitivity analysis for late seizure showed no significant difference between LEV and PHT in reducing the late seizure occurrence after TBI (OR = 0.87; 95% CI = [0.21, 3.67]; p = 0.853, fixed-effect, I2 = 0%). The mortality in TBI patients treated with LEV was not statistically significant compared to the PHT group (OR = 1.11; 95% CI = [0.92, 1.34], p = 0.266). The length of stay in the hospital was not significantly different between the LEV and PHT groups (MD = -1.33; 95% CI = [-4.55, 1.90]; p = 0.421). However, in comparison to PHT, LEV shortened the length of ICU stay (MD = -2.25; 95% CI = [-3.58, -0.91]; p =0.001). In terms of adverse effects, more patients in the PHT group have experienced adverse events compared to LEV but the difference was not significant (OR = 0.69; 95% CI = [0.44, 1.08]; p = 0. 11). CONCLUSION: The results of our meta-analysis showed LEV and PHT have similar effects on the occurrence of early and late seizures in TBI patients. Therefore, none of the drugs is superior to the other in reducing PTS. However, treating TBI patients with LEV did not shorten the length of hospital stay in comparison to PHT but reduced the length of ICU stay significantly. The analysis showed that patients in the LEV experienced fewer side effects than in the PHT group, while it was not sufficiently clear whether all reported side effects were related to the drug alone or other factors. The mortality was similar between the LEV and PHT groups. Finally, we recommend more high-quality randomized controlled trials to confirm the current findings before making any recommendations in practice.

Efficacy and safety of phenytoin and levetiracetam for acute symptomatic seizures in children with acute encephalitis syndrome: an open label, randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Seizures represent a significant comorbidity in children with acute encephalitis syndrome (AES). Despite this, there is a notable absence of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) directly comparing antiseizure medications (ASMs) in children with AES. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This RCT aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of phenytoin and levetiracetam in controlling seizures among children with AES. Both ASMs were administered with a loading followed by maintenance dose. After a 12-week period, children exhibiting a normal electroencephalogram and no seizure recurrence underwent tapering and discontinuation of ASM. Clinical follow-up occurred daily for the first week, and subsequently at 4, 12, and 24 weeks, evaluating seizure recurrence, incidence of status epilepticus, cognition, behavior, functional status, ASM acquisition cost, and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of 100 children (50 in each group) were enrolled. Within the first week, 5 and 3 children in the phenytoin and levetiracetam groups expired. Up to 1 week or death (whichever occurred earliest), 46 (92 %) and 44 (88 %) children remained seizure-free. Intention-to-treat analysis for both best and worst-case scenarios showed insignificant differences (p=0.52 and 1.0). No children experienced seizure recurrence after 1 week in either group. The number of patients with breakthrough status epilepticus, need for mechanical ventilation, duration of hospital stay, presence of epileptiform abnormalities in repeat electroencephalogram at 12 weeks, functional outcomes at 1, 12, and 24 weeks, as well as cognition and behavioral profiles at 24 weeks, were comparable in both groups (p>0.05 for all). However, the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) causally related to study medications was significantly higher in the phenytoin group (p=0.04). CONCLUSION: Levetiracetam and phenytoin are comparable in efficacy in terms of achieving clinical seizure control in children with acute encephalitis syndrome, although levetiracetam group demonstrated fewer adverse effects.

Second antiseizure medication monotherapy in patients with adult-onset epilepsy: A register-based analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Revision of therapy is fundamental in epilepsy care, since only half of patients achieve seizure freedom and tolerate the first antiseizure medication (ASM). We studied the selection and retention of second antiseizure medication monotherapy in adults who discontinued treatment with one of the three most frequently prescribed first ASMs, and the impact of age or brain comorbidities. METHODS: Using Swedish national registers, we conducted a population-based, retrospective cohort study from 2007 to 2019 on patients age ≥ 30 at the epilepsy diagnosis that had switched to a second monotherapy after the three most common initial monotherapies (n = 7369). Retention rates (RR) were estimated via Kaplan-Meier. Discontinuation of the second monotherapy was defined as 12-month prescription gap or initiation of a third ASM. Analyses were stratified by sex, age, and presence of stroke or dementia. RESULTS: The three most commonly prescribed second ASMs were carbamazepine, levetiracetam, and lamotrigine. The 1-year retention rate was 63-76% in all patients. For groups with stroke or dementia, the maximal 1-year RRs were 77% and 87%, respectively. After five years, retention rates ranged from 12% to 39%. There were no major differences between ASMs, apart from in patients discontinuing carbamazepine, where lamotrigine had a superior retention compared to levetiracetam as second monotherapy. SIGNIFICANCE: The three most often prescribed second ASMs seem to be suitable treatment options according to present guidelines. The second ASMs' retention rates were initially high in all studied patient groups but dropped to approximately the expected proportion of second monotherapy responders over the next five years. This suggests that therapy revision could be expedited.

Dose adjustment strategy of levetiracetam in pregnant patients with epilepsy: Case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Pregnant patients with epilepsy are prone to preterm delivery, stillbirth, or cesarean section, and their mortality rate is almost 10 times higher than that of normal pregnant women. The potential negative influences of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the fetus are weighed against the necessity for achieving optimal control of seizures. Treatment with AEDs during pregnancy is a major challenge for pregnant women and healthcare teams. PATIENT CONCERNS: This paper reports two cases of young women diagnosed with pregnancy and epilepsy. INTERVENTION: The dose of levetiracetam was adjusted under the guidance of therapeutic drug monitoring to reduce the effects of seizures on the fetus and the incidence of reproductive toxicity caused by adverse drug reactions. OUTCOMES: Epilepsy was well controlled in the two pregnant patients, and the newborns had no genetic disorders. LESSONS: It is recommended to regularly monitor the serum LEV level in pregnant patients with epilepsy. This practice serves as a foundation for adjusting the drug treatment plan and offering more precise guidance for medication management during pregnancy.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment of epilepsy in Indonesia.

INTRODUCTION: Adverse skin reactions due to drugs such as Stevens Johnson Syndrome (SJS) and Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis (TEN) occur in 3% of people receiving anti epileptic drugs (AED). Although SJS/TEN has a low incidence, the mortality and morbidity rates are high. Indonesia has not adopted HLA-B*1502 screening prior to administration of carbamazepine (CBZ), although previous studies found a relationship between HLA-B*1502 and SJS/TEN. METHODS: A hybrid decision tree and Markov model was developed to evaluate three strategies for treating newly diagnosed focal epilepsy: CBZ direct therapy, levetiracetam (LEV) direct therapy, and therapy based on HLA-B*15:02 test results. From a societal perspective, base case and sensitivity analyses were carried out over a lifetime. RESULTS: Direct administration of CBZ appears to have a slightly lower average cost than the HLA-B*15:02 allele screening strategy. The increase in quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in HLA-B*15:02 screening before treatment related to the cost difference reached 0.519 with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of around USD 984 per unit of QALY acquisition. Direct treatment of LEV increased treatment costs by almost USD 2000 on average compared to the standard CBZ strategy. The increase in QALY is 0.834 in direct levetiracetam treatment, with an ICER of around USD 2230 for each QALY processing. CONCLUSION: Calculation of the cost-effectiveness of lifetime epilepsy therapy in this study found that the initial screening strategy with the HLA-B*15:02 test was the most cost-effective.

Predictors of Seizure Recurrence in Women With Idiopathic Generalized Epilepsy Who Switch From Valproate to Another Medication.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the predictors of seizure recurrence in women of childbearing age with idiopathic generalized epilepsy (IGE) who switched from valproate (VPA) to alternative antiseizure medications (ASMs) and compare the effectiveness of levetiracetam (LEV) and lamotrigine (LTG) as VPA alternatives after switch. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included women of childbearing age diagnosed with IGE from 16 epilepsy centers. Study outcomes included worsening or recurrence of generalized tonic-clonic seizure (GTCS) at 12 months and 24 months after the switch from VPA to an alternative ASM. The comparative effectiveness of LEV and LTG as alternative ASM following VPA discontinuation was assessed through inverse probability treatment-weighted (IPTW) Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: We included 426 women with IGE, with a median (interquartile range) age at VPA switch of 24 (19-30) years and a median VPA dosage of 750 (500-1,000) mg/d. The most common reason for VPA switch was teratogenicity concern in 249 women (58.6%), and the most common ASM used in place of VPA was LEV in 197 (46.2%) cases, followed by LTG in 140 (32.9%). GTCS worsening/recurrence occurred in 105 (24.6%) and 139 (32.6%) women at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Catamenial worsening of seizures, higher VPA dosage during switch, multiple seizure types, and shorter duration of GTCS freedom before switch were independent predictors of GTCS recurrence or worsening at 12 months according to mixed multivariable logistic regression analysis. After internal-external validation through 16 independent cohorts, the model showed an area under the curve of 0.71 (95% CI 0.64-0.77). In the subgroup of 337 women who switched to LEV or LTG, IPTW Cox regression analysis showed that LEV was associated with a reduced risk of GTCS worsening or recurrence compared with LTG (adjusted hazard ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.40-0.87, p = 0.008) during the 24-month follow-up. DISCUSSION: Our findings can have practical implications for optimizing counselling and treatment choices in women of childbearing age with IGE and may help clinicians in making informed treatment decisions in this special population of patients. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for women with IGE switching from VPA, LEV was associated with a reduced risk of GTCS worsening or recurrence compared with LTG.

Use of levetiracetam for the successful treatment of suspected myoclonic seizures: five dogs (2016-2022).

OBJECTIVES: Myoclonic seizures are considered a type of generalised seizure characterised by brief, jerking movements of the body. The aim of this study is to describe cases of suspected canine myoclonic seizure of idiopathic aetiology and to discuss the successful use of the anticonvulsant levetiracetam as treatment in each of these cases. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Dogs with epileptic myoclonus suspected to be idiopathic in aetiology were considered for inclusion. Medical records were reviewed for physical and neurologic examination findings, clinicopathologic results, and diagnostic imaging results. All included dogs were treated with levetiracetam, and their response was reported. RESULTS: Five dogs were included, all of which had suspected myoclonic seizures either observed in-person or on video recording by a board-certified veterinary neurologist. The duration of myoclonic seizures preceding treatment ranged from one day to one year. One dog also experienced a generalised tonic-clonic seizure. All dogs were treated with levetiracetam. Two dogs experienced long-term myoclonic seizure freedom (duration seizure-free of at least 1 year), and two dogs experienced marked decreased myoclonic seizure frequency. One dog experienced immediate abatement of myoclonic seizures, although levetiracetam was only utilised for 1 month following onset of myoclonic seizures in this patient. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Myoclonic seizures can be idiopathic in aetiology. Levetiracetam can be used effectively to rapidly stop myoclonic seizures and to decrease the frequency of myoclonic seizures.