Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 1.644
Filter
1.
J Correct Health Care ; 29(4): 275-281, 2023 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37267214

ABSTRACT

Millions of dollars are spent annually in private litigation against jails. This article analyzes a novel dataset developed from dockets and reports of cases filed against jails by the estates of individuals who died in jail custody. The total amount of plaintiffs' awards represented in the sample was over $292,234,224. Cases attributing the cause of death to officer use of force had the highest average award ($2,243,079). Our findings suggest that suicide is still the most common cause of death for people in jail custody. Yet complications from a physical illness were not far behind, and nearly 20% of all cases in the sample were drug or alcohol related. In the first 24 hours of custody, people in jail were most at risk of drug-related deaths and suicide.


Subject(s)
Jails , Liability, Legal , Prisoners , Humans , Jails/economics , Jails/legislation & jurisprudence , Jails/statistics & numerical data , Prisoners/legislation & jurisprudence , Prisoners/statistics & numerical data , Liability, Legal/economics , Cause of Death , Time Factors
3.
J Vasc Surg ; 75(3): 962-967, 2022 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34601048

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE/BACKGROUND: Thoracic outlet syndrome (TOS) is most often referred to vascular surgeons. However, there is a lack of understanding of the malpractice cases involving TOS. The goal of this study is to better understand the medicolegal landscape related to the care of TOS. METHODS: The Westlaw Edge AI-powered proprietary system was retrospectively reviewed for malpractice cases involving TOS. A Boolean search strategy was used to identify target cases under the case category of "Jury Verdicts & Settlements" for all state and federal jurisdictions from 1970 to September 2020. The settled case was described but not included in the statistical analysis. Descriptive statistics were used to report our findings, and when appropriate. The P ≤ .05 decision rule was established a priori as the null hypothesis rejection criterion to determine associations between jury verdicts outcomes and state's tort reform status. RESULTS: In this study, 39 cases were identified and met the study's inclusion criteria from the entire Westlaw Edge database. Among plaintiffs who disclosed age and/or gender, median age was 35.0 years with a female majority (67.6%). Cases involving TOS were noted to be steadily decreasing since the mid-1990s. The cases were unevenly spread across 18 states, with the highest number of cases (14, 35.9%) from California and the second highest (4, 10.3%) from Pennsylvania. A similar uneven distribution was seen among U.S. census regions, in which the West had the highest cases (39.5%). The study revealed that more cases were brought to trials in tort reform states (26, 68.4%) than in non-tort reform states (12, 31.6%). A total of 24 of 39 (61.5%) plaintiffs had one specific claim, which resulted in their economic and noneconomic damages. Negligent operation and treatment complication represented an overwhelming majority of claims brought by 38 of 39 plaintiffs (97.4%). Misdiagnosis and lack of informed consent were both brought nine times (23.1%) by the group. Intraoperative nerve injury (20 patients, 51.3%) was the most commonly reported complication. Excluding one case with a settlement of $965,000, 30 of 38 (78.9%) cases went to trials and received defense verdicts. Eight cases (20.5%) were found in favor of plaintiffs with a median payout of $725,581. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlighted higher than average payouts to plaintiffs and risk factors that may result in malpractice lawsuits for surgeons undertaking TOS treatment. Future studies are needed to further clarify the relationships between tort reform and outcomes of malpractice cases involving TOS.


Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress , Decompression, Surgical/economics , Insurance, Liability/economics , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Medical Errors/economics , Postoperative Complications/economics , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/surgery , Vascular Surgical Procedures/economics , Adult , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Databases, Factual , Decompression, Surgical/adverse effects , Decompression, Surgical/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Insurance, Liability/legislation & jurisprudence , Male , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Policy Making , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Thoracic Outlet Syndrome/economics , Treatment Outcome , Vascular Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Vascular Surgical Procedures/legislation & jurisprudence
4.
World Neurosurg ; 151: 341-347, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34243667

ABSTRACT

Neurosurgery is considered to have one of the greatest risks of medical malpractice claims. However, medicolegal issues in neurosurgery are often disregarded and underrated worldwide. Medical errors in the neurosurgical field can be attributed to multiple factors, including highly morbid pathologies, the technical difficulty of neurosurgical procedures, and the involvement and interaction of a multidisciplinary team in the care of neurosurgical patients. Health care providers worldwide are at risk of lawsuits, sometimes even when no deviation from the standard of care had occurred in a given case. Often, governments use additional tactics to decrease the burden on compensators and extrajudicial institutions and to decrease the court's flow of irrational litigation. Continuous amendments to health care acts and newer reforms to address these issues have materialized worldwide. In the present narrative review, we have reviewed the global perspectives of medicolegal issues, with a focus on neurosurgical discipline.


Subject(s)
Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Neurosurgery/legislation & jurisprudence , Socioeconomic Factors , Humans , Neurosurgical Procedures/adverse effects
5.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 15(8): 909-918, 2021 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34112036

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Medical professional liability (MPL) is a notable concern for many clinicians, especially in procedure-intensive specialties such as gastroenterology (GI). Comprehensive understanding of the basis for MPL claims can improve gastroenterologists' practice, lower MPL risk, and improve the overall patient care experience. This is particularly relevant in the setting of the increasing average compensation per paid GI-related MPL claim, and evolving healthcare delivery patterns and regulations.Areas Covered: MPL claims are generally grounded in the concept of negligence, a broad term that may apply to situations involving medical errors, ameliorable adverse events, inadequate informed consent and/or refusal, and numerous others. Though often not directly discussed in GI training or thereafter, there are various mechanisms and behaviors that can alter (decrease or increase) MPL risk. Additional dimensions of MPL include telemedicine, social media, and vicarious liability. We discuss these topics as well as takeaways to mitigate risk, thus reducing unnecessary clinician anxiety, promoting professional development, and optimizing healthcare outcomes.Expert Opinion: MPL risk is modifiable. Strong provider-patient relationships, through effective communication, patient reassurance, and enhanced informed consent, decrease risk, as does thorough documentation. Conversely, provider 'defensive' mechanisms intended to decrease MPL risk, including assurance and avoidance behaviors, may paradoxically increase it.


Subject(s)
Gastroenterology , Liability, Legal , Communication , Documentation , Gastroenterology/economics , Gastroenterology/legislation & jurisprudence , Gastroenterology/standards , Humans , Informed Consent , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Physician-Patient Relations , Risk Factors
7.
West J Emerg Med ; 22(2): 333-338, 2021 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33856320

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: This study reviews malpractice, also called medical professional liability (MPL), claims involving adult patients cared for in emergency departments (ED) and urgent care settings. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of closed MPL claims of adults over 18 years, from the Medical Professional Liability Association's Data Sharing Project database from 2001-2015, identifying 6,779 closed claims. Data included the total amount, origin, top medical specialties named, chief medical factors, top medical conditions, severity of injury, resolution, average indemnity, and defense costs of closed claims. RESULTS: Of 6,779 closed claims, 65.9% were dropped, withdrawn, or dismissed. Another 22.8% of claims settled for an average indemnity of $297,709. Of the 515 (7.6%) cases that went to trial, juries returned verdicts for the defendant in 92.6% of cases (477/515). The remaining 7.4% of cases (38/515) were jury verdicts for the plaintiff, with an average indemnity of $816,909. The most common resulting medical condition cited in paid claims was cardiac or cardiorespiratory arrest (10.4%). Error in diagnosis was the most common chief medical error cited in closed claims. Death was the most common level of severity listed in closed (38.5%) and paid (42.8%) claims. Claims reporting major permanent injury had the highest paid-to-closed ratio, and those reporting grave injury had the highest average indemnity of $686,239. CONCLUSION: This retrospective review updates the body of knowledge surrounding medical professional liability and represents the most recent analysis of claims in emergency medicine. As the majority of emergency providers will be named in a MPL claim during their career, it is essential to have a better understanding of the most common factors resulting in MPL claims.


Subject(s)
Ambulatory Care , Emergency Medical Services , Emergency Medicine , Emergency Service, Hospital , Malpractice , Adult , Ambulatory Care/legislation & jurisprudence , Ambulatory Care/methods , Emergency Medical Services/legislation & jurisprudence , Emergency Medical Services/methods , Emergency Service, Hospital/economics , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Female , Humans , Insurance Claim Review , Liability, Legal/economics , Male , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Malpractice/trends , Retrospective Studies , United States
8.
Bull Cancer ; 108(4): 352-358, 2021 Apr.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33678407

ABSTRACT

In a few situations, the consequences secondary to a carcinological pathology require an assessment of damages for compensatory purposes. This is particularly the case when liable parties have been found to be at cause of the disease: occupational pathologies in the case of inexcusable employer's fault, exposure to a radioactive risk, for example in the context of full compensation for damages suffered by the victims of nuclear experiments performed by France, or lastly, in the after-effects of late diagnosis. This article does not discuss the imputability of cancer pathologies to an event, but it proposes an adaptation of methods for assessing damages, in an attempt to provide full compensation for damages.


Subject(s)
Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Liability, Legal , Neoplasms , Occupational Diseases , Causality , Disability Evaluation , Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse Reactions , Esthetics , France , Human Experimentation/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Learning Disabilities/etiology , Liability, Legal/economics , Neoplasms/economics , Neoplasms/etiology , Neoplasms/psychology , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/economics , Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced/etiology , Occupational Diseases/economics , Occupational Diseases/etiology , Pain , Postoperative Complications , Radiation Injuries/economics , Radiation Injuries/etiology , Radiotherapy/adverse effects , Sexual Dysfunction, Physiological/etiology , Social Responsibility
9.
Health Econ Policy Law ; 16(3): 308-324, 2021 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33557981

ABSTRACT

One explanation for increases in health care costs has been malpractice lawsuits. States have introduced several types of tort reforms to control increases in health care costs. This paper adds to the literature by examining how the differences in joint and several liability (JSL) reforms affect the state-specific growth rate in health care expenditures. Additionally, the paper addresses the potential for a fundamental difference between states that pass different types of liability reforms. The results show that JSL reforms that limit joint liability based on percentage of blame have statistically and economically significant impacts on health care expenditure growth rates.


Subject(s)
Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Models, Econometric , Health Care Reform/economics , United States
10.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 147(1): 239-247, 2021 01 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33370072

ABSTRACT

SUMMARY: The current status of the plastic surgeon in the medical liability spectrum and ways to avoid litigation are explored by using pooled national data from the Medical Professional Liability Association, private information from Applied Medico-Legal Solutions RRG, and a detailed literature search. The medical liability system in the United States costs $55.6 billion, or 2.4 percent of total health care spending. Plastic surgery accounts for 3.31 percent of reported claims and 3.16 percent of paid claims. Total payments for plastic surgeons represent 1.75 percent of the total paid for all specialties. Malpractice awards are relatively light for plastic surgeons. Nevertheless, they still have a 15 percent chance per year of being sued. However, 93 percent of cases will close with a dismissal or a settlement, and only 7 percent will go to trial. Of these, the plastic surgeon will prevail in 79 percent. Most importantly, 75 percent of all cases will result in no payment. To minimize the chances of a lawsuit, plastic surgeons should maintain excellent communication with their patients and participate in shared decision-making. They should take a leadership role and buy in to the performance of perioperative checklists, embrace patient education, and actively participate in Maintenance of Certification. They should be transparent in their dealings with patients by preoperatively declaring their policies on revisions, refunds, complications, and payments. Plastic surgeons must maintain complete and accurate medical records and participate in hospital-based programs of prophylaxis. They should be aware that postoperative infection is the single costliest adverse outcome and proactively deal with it.


Subject(s)
Liability, Legal/economics , Medical Errors/prevention & control , Plastic Surgery Procedures/adverse effects , Postoperative Complications/economics , Surgery, Plastic/economics , Checklist/standards , Communication , Decision Making, Shared , Humans , Informed Consent/legislation & jurisprudence , Informed Consent/standards , Medical Errors/economics , Medical Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Medical Errors/statistics & numerical data , Patient Education as Topic/legislation & jurisprudence , Patient Education as Topic/standards , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Plastic Surgery Procedures/economics , Plastic Surgery Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/economics , Surgeons/legislation & jurisprudence , Surgeons/standards , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Surgery, Plastic/standards , Surgery, Plastic/statistics & numerical data , United States
11.
Med Law Rev ; 29(1): 172-184, 2021 Aug 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33221917

ABSTRACT

This comment piece explores the decision in Whittington Hospital NHS Trust v XX [2020] UKSC 14. It argues that despite notable shifts in public policy in respect of the acceptability of surrogacy as a means of family formation in the past twenty years, the Supreme Court has taken a step too far in deciding that foreign commercial surrogacy is as widely socially accepted. This impacts on the reasonableness of any claim for damages in negligence for the costs of commercial surrogacy. It is posited that the issue of whether damages for foreign commercial surrogacy are reasonable or not will be the key battleground in future negligence cases of this type.


Subject(s)
Commerce/legislation & jurisprudence , Compensation and Redress/legislation & jurisprudence , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Public Policy , Surrogate Mothers/legislation & jurisprudence , Female , Humans , Infertility/chemically induced , Pregnancy , State Medicine/legislation & jurisprudence , United Kingdom
12.
Tex Med ; 116(9): 44-45, 2020 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33023285
13.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(6): 102693, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32866849

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Facial nerve paralysis from head and neck tumors can result from disease progression or iatrogenic causes, leading to litigation. The aim of this study was to investigate lawsuits regarding facial paralysis as a consequence of these tumors to understand and better educate physicians behind the reasons for litigation. METHODS: Jury verdict reviews were obtained from the Westlaw database from 1985 to 2018. Gathered data, including verdicts, litigation reasons, defendant specialties, and amounts awarded, were analyzed via Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. RESULTS: Of the 26 lawsuits analyzed, the leading reason for litigation was failure to diagnose (53.8%), followed by iatrogenic injury (34.6%). The average award was $2,704,470. Otolaryngologists were the most common defendants. Defendants that included an otolaryngologist had shorter delays of diagnosis compared to those that did not (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Failure to diagnose parotid injury was the leading cause of litigation. In instances where the jury found for the plaintiff, the amount was material. There were equivalent incidences of cases in favor of plaintiffs and defendants.


Subject(s)
Costs and Cost Analysis/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis/legislation & jurisprudence , Diagnostic Errors/economics , Diagnostic Errors/legislation & jurisprudence , Facial Nerve , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Iatrogenic Disease , Jurisprudence , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Otolaryngologists/economics , Otolaryngologists/legislation & jurisprudence , Paralysis , Postoperative Complications , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child, Preschool , Data Analysis , Databases, Factual , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Parotid Gland/injuries , Young Adult
14.
15.
Tex Med ; 116(5): 25-27, 2020 May 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32645187

ABSTRACT

Like many broad legislative measures, Texas' 2003 medical liability reforms continue to be a target for opponents long after being signed into law. The Texas Medical Association is fighting again to defend them. The measure under siege this time prevents patients who file negligence or other lawsuits from adding to their damage award through family members' settlements stemming from the same case - that is, no "double-dipping."


Subject(s)
Awards and Prizes , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , Societies, Medical/organization & administration , Humans , Texas
16.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 99(27): e21134, 2020 Jul 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32629748

ABSTRACT

Implant ruptures may be diagnosed by physical examination, ultrasound (US), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The absence of standard guidelines to approach to implant ruptures may cause unnecessary surgical revisions in the absence of radiological confirmation of prosthetic damages.The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic procedures applied to patients with suspected prosthetic rupture and surgeon choices to perform a revision or to plan a clinical and radiological follow-up.We conducted a retrospective study on 62 women submitted to revision surgery due to radiological diagnosis of suspected implant rupture, following mastectomy or aesthetic reconstruction, and admitted to a Plastic Surgery Department between 2008 and 2018.Seventy-three implants, believed to be ruptured, were explanted. One-third of these were intact and unnecessarily explanted. US associated with MRI evaluation resulted in the most helpful diagnostical method.A standardized clinical and radiological approach is essential to manage breast implant ruptures successfully. An innovative protocol is proposed in order to: ensure the appropriate management of implant ruptures and prevent unnecessary surgical revisions; reduce the risk of claims for medical malpractice in cases of unsatisfactory final aesthetic results or worse than before.


Subject(s)
Breast Implants/adverse effects , Choice Behavior/physiology , Mastectomy/adverse effects , Surgery, Plastic/adverse effects , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Liability, Legal/economics , Magnetic Resonance Imaging/methods , Malpractice/statistics & numerical data , Reoperation/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Rupture/complications , Rupture/diagnostic imaging , Rupture/surgery , Surgeons/psychology , Ultrasonography/methods
17.
J AAPOS ; 24(4): 195-196, 2020 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32712159

ABSTRACT

The use of telemedicine tools has increased significantly due to the COVID-19 emergency and practice restrictions imposed by states. As restrictions are loosened, telemedicine is a cost effective and efficient way to render care to patients. Suggestions are offered for maintaining contact with patients, managing their expectations for care, and rendering care in a prudent and timely manner. By following these steps, professional liability risk (medical malpractice) can be mitigated.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Liability, Legal/economics , Malpractice/economics , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2 , Telemedicine/methods , Humans
18.
PLoS One ; 15(5): e0233334, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32437376

ABSTRACT

To update the landscape analysis of vaccine injuries no-fault compensation programmes, we conducted a scoping review and a survey of World Health Organization Member States. We describe the characteristics of existing no-fault compensation systems during 2018 based on six common programme elements. No-fault compensation systems for vaccine injuries have been developed in a few high-income countries for more than 50 years. Twenty-five jurisdictions were identified with no-fault compensation programmes, of which two were recently implemented in a low- and a lower-middle-income country. The no-fault compensation programmes in most jurisdictions are implemented at the central or federal government level and are government funded. Eligibility criteria for vaccine injury compensation vary considerably across the evaluated programmes. Notably, most programmes cover injuries arising from vaccines that are registered in the country and are recommended by authorities for routine use in children, pregnant women, adults (e.g. influenza vaccines) and for special indications. A claim process is initiated once the injured party or their legal representative files for compensation with a special administrative body in most programmes. All no-fault compensation programmes reviewed require standard of proof showing a causal association between vaccination and injury. Once a final decision has been reached, claimants are compensated with either: lump-sums; amounts calculated based on medical care costs and expenses, loss of earnings or earning capacity; or monetary compensation calculated based on pain and suffering, emotional distress, permanent impairment or loss of function; or combination of those. In most jurisdictions, vaccine injury claimants have the right to seek damages either through civil litigation or from a compensation scheme but not both simultaneously. Data from this report provide an empirical basis on which global guidance for implementing such schemes could be developed.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Liability , Vaccines/adverse effects , Adult , Child , Compensation and Redress , Female , Global Health , Health Policy/economics , Health Policy/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Liability, Legal/economics , Male , Malpractice/economics , Malpractice/legislation & jurisprudence , National Health Programs/economics , National Health Programs/legislation & jurisprudence , Pregnancy , Surveys and Questionnaires , Vaccination/adverse effects , Vaccination/economics , Vaccination/legislation & jurisprudence , Vaccines/economics , World Health Organization
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...