ABSTRACT
This year, we observe sixty's anniversary of the article by a British psychiatrist, Geoffrey Hartigan, demonstrating, for the first time, the possibility of preventing of the recurrence of mood disorders by using lithium salts. Herein, a history of prevention of recurrences of mood disorders both worldwide and in Poland will be presented concerning both lithium and other mood-stabilizing drugs. The merit for verifying the prophylactic lithium effect in the 1960-1970s should be given to Danish researchers, Mogens Schou and Poul Baastrup. In Poland, the first paper on prophylactic lithium appeared already in 1971. In the 1970s, French researchers showed prophylactic activity of valproic acid amide, and Japanese researchers - carbamazepine. In the 1980th, studies on valproic acid amide were performed in the 2nd Psychiatric Clinic of the Institute of Psychiatry and Neurology led by Prof. Puzynski. Since the mid-1990s, 2nd generation of mood-stabilizing drugs has been introduced, including some atypical antipsychotics (clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, aripiprazole, risperidone) and anticonvulsant drug, lamotrigine, showing prophylactic activity in bipolar mood disorder. The studies on lithium resulted in the identification of factors connected with its prophylactic efficacy as well as the antisuicidal, antiviral, and neuroprotective effects of this drug. From a sixty-year perspective following Hartigan's article, it seems that his pioneering concept on the possibility of pharmacological influence on the course of mood disorders was fully confirmed. Current Polish recommendations on pharmacological prophylaxis of mood disorders were presented in the books "Standardy leczenia niektórych zaburzen psychicznych" and "Psychofarmakologia kliniczna", both published in 2022.
Subject(s)
Antipsychotic Agents , Mood Disorders , Humans , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/history , Antipsychotic Agents/history , Antipsychotic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/prevention & control , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/history , Mood Disorders/prevention & control , Mood Disorders/drug therapy , Mood Disorders/history , Poland , Secondary PreventionABSTRACT
Lithium is considered to be the most effective mood stabilizer for bipolar disorder. Evolving evidence suggested lithium can also regulate bone metabolism which may reduce the risk of fractures. While there are concerns about fractures for antipsychotics and mood stabilizing antiepileptics, very little is known about the overall risk of fractures associated with specific treatments. This study aimed to compare the risk of fractures in patients with bipolar disorder prescribed lithium, antipsychotics or mood stabilizing antiepileptics (valproate, lamotrigine, carbamazepine). Among 40,697 patients with bipolar disorder from 1993 to 2019 identified from a primary care electronic health record database in the UK, 13,385 were new users of mood stabilizing agents (lithium:2339; non-lithium: 11,046). Lithium was associated with a lower risk of fractures compared with non-lithium treatments (HR 0.66, 95 % CI 0.44-0.98). The results were similar when comparing lithium with prolactin raising and sparing antipsychotics, and individual antiepileptics. Lithium use may lower fracture risk, a benefit that is particularly relevant for patients with serious mental illness who are more prone to falls due to their behaviors. Our findings could help inform better treatment decisions for bipolar disorder, and lithium's potential to prevent fractures should be considered for patients at high risk of fractures.
Subject(s)
Antimanic Agents , Antipsychotic Agents , Bipolar Disorder , Fractures, Bone , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Female , Male , Middle Aged , Adult , Antipsychotic Agents/adverse effects , Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Fractures, Bone/chemically induced , Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Lithium Compounds/adverse effects , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Aged , United Kingdom/epidemiology , Lithium/therapeutic use , Lithium/adverse effectsABSTRACT
By manipulating inclusion criteria, one can prove whatever point one wishes in meta-analysis. This critique examines a recent meta-analysis claiming lithium ineffectiveness for suicidality, based on three biased features: inclusion of many large studies specifically designed to exclude suicidality, producing zero suicide outcomes in all groups (n = 1856), thereby artificially decreasing statistical significance; arbitrary exclusion of all trials prior to the year 2000, thereby excluding two randomized clinical trials which demonstrated benefit for lithium; and underreporting of placebo suicide events in a recent randomized trial. It thereby created a smaller effect size (two suicides with lithium versus five with placebo = RR = 0.42), though still beneficial for lithium, and a larger denominator of no events (total n for included studies = 2578), leading to the claim of statistical non-significance (95% confidence intervals (CIs) 0.1-4.5). The same literature can be analyzed including the two excluded older studies, and including the two placebo deaths in the recent trial, producing a larger effect size (two suicides with lithium versus nine with placebo, RR = 0.25). Furthermore, uninformative studies with no events could be excluded (total n for included studies = 1203), as is standard practice in meta-analysis, producing statistically significant results (95% CIs 0.05, 0.83). This more complete, more accurate, and less biased meta-analysis is provided in this article.In short, including all studies with non-zero suicide outcomes, there is clear benefit for lithium. The recent meta-analysis is a classic example of pseudoscience, using scientific technique superficially to confirm, rather than refute, one's own opinions.
Subject(s)
Lithium Compounds , Suicide , Humans , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Meta-Analysis as TopicABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The therapeutic response to lithium in patients with bipolar disorder is highly variable and has a polygenic basis. Genome-wide association studies investigating lithium response have identified several relevant loci, though the precise mechanisms driving these associations are poorly understood. We aimed to prioritise the most likely effector gene and determine the mechanisms underlying an intergenic lithium response locus on chromosome 21 identified by the International Consortium on Lithium Genetics (ConLi+Gen). METHODS: We conducted in-silico functional analyses by integrating and synthesising information from several publicly available functional genetic datasets and databases including the Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project and HaploReg. RESULTS: The findings from this study highlighted TMPRSS15 as the most likely effector gene at the ConLi+Gen lithium response locus. TMPRSS15 encodes enterokinase, a gastrointestinal enzyme responsible for converting trypsinogen into trypsin and thus aiding digestion. Convergent findings from gene-based lookups in human and mouse databases as well as co-expression network analyses of small intestinal RNA-seq data (GTEx) implicated TMPRSS15 in the regulation of intestinal nutrient absorption, including ions like sodium and potassium, which may extend to lithium. LIMITATIONS: Although the findings from this study indicated that TMPRSS15 was the most likely effector gene at the ConLi+Gen lithium response locus, the evidence was circumstantial. Thus, the conclusions from this study need to be validated in appropriately designed wet-lab studies. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this study are consistent with a model whereby TMPRSS15 impacts the efficacy of lithium treatment in patients with bipolar disorder by modulating intestinal lithium absorption.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Computer Simulation , Intestinal Absorption , Serine Endopeptidases , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Bipolar Disorder/metabolism , Humans , Intestinal Absorption/drug effects , Serine Endopeptidases/genetics , Serine Endopeptidases/metabolism , Mice , Animals , Membrane Proteins/genetics , Membrane Proteins/metabolism , Lithium/therapeutic use , Lithium/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Genome-Wide Association Study , Lithium Compounds/pharmacology , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/pharmacokineticsABSTRACT
Over the last six decades, lithium has been considered the gold standard treatment for the long-term management of bipolar disorder due to its efficacy in preventing both manic and depressive episodes as well as suicidal behaviors. Nevertheless, despite numerous observed effects on various cellular pathways and biologic systems, the precise mechanism through which lithium stabilizes mood remains elusive. Furthermore, there is recent support for the therapeutic potential of lithium in other brain diseases. This review offers a comprehensive examination of contemporary understanding and predominant theories concerning the diverse mechanisms underlying lithium's effects. These findings are based on investigations utilizing cellular and animal models of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders. Recent studies have provided additional support for the significance of glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition as a crucial mechanism. Furthermore, research has shed more light on the interconnections between GSK3-mediated neuroprotective, antioxidant, and neuroplasticity processes. Moreover, recent advancements in animal and human models have provided valuable insights into how lithium-induced modifications at the homeostatic synaptic plasticity level may play a pivotal role in its clinical effectiveness. We focused on findings from translational studies suggesting that lithium may interface with microRNA expression. Finally, we are exploring the repurposing potential of lithium beyond bipolar disorder. These recent findings on the therapeutic mechanisms of lithium have provided important clues toward developing predictive models of response to lithium treatment and identifying new biologic targets. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Lithium is the drug of choice for the treatment of bipolar disorder, but its mechanism of action in stabilizing mood remains elusive. This review presents the latest evidence on lithium's various mechanisms of action. Recent evidence has strengthened glycogen synthase kinase-3 (GSK3) inhibition, changes at the level of homeostatic synaptic plasticity, and regulation of microRNA expression as key mechanisms, providing an intriguing perspective that may help bridge the mechanistic gap between molecular functions and its clinical efficacy as a mood stabilizer.
Subject(s)
Lithium Compounds , Humans , Animals , Lithium Compounds/pharmacology , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/pharmacology , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Neuronal Plasticity/drug effects , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/metabolism , Glycogen Synthase Kinase 3/antagonists & inhibitorsABSTRACT
This is a case of a 35-year-old woman who presented with an 18-month history of post (long)-COVID depression and exhaustion along with recurrent fevers and treatment-resistant skin boils, all of which abated with lithium treatment at a serum level of 1.14 mmol/L, and all of which worsened when the lithium serum level was lowered to 0.8. This paper illustrates Lithium's effectiveness in the treatment of post (long)-COVID syndrome, though a higher serum concentration may be required.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Lithium , Female , Humans , Adult , Lithium/therapeutic use , Depression , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Dementia is a neurodegenerative disease with insidious onset and progressive progression, of which the most common type is Alzheimer's disease (AD). Lithium, a trace element in the body, has neuroprotective properties. However, whether lithium can treat dementia or AD remains a highly controversial topic. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic literature review was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science. Comparison of the effects of lithium on AD or dementia in terms of use, duration, and dosage, and meta-analysis to test whether lithium therapy is beneficial in ameliorating the onset of dementia or AD. Sensitivity analyses were performed using a stepwise exclusion method. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of included studies. We determined the relative risk (RR) between patient groups using a random-effects model. RESULTS: A total of seven studies were included. The forest plot results showed that taking lithium therapy reduced the risk of AD (RR 0.59, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44-0.78) and is also protective in reducing the risk of dementia (RR 0.66, 95% CI: 0.56-0.77). The duration of lithium therapy was able to affect dementia incidence (RR 0.70, 95% CI: 0.55-0.88); however, it is unclear how this effect might manifest in AD. It is also uncertain how many prescriptions for lithium treatment lower the chance of dementia development. CONCLUSION: The duration of treatment and the usage of lithium therapy seem to lower the risk of AD and postpone the onset of dementia.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Dementia , Humans , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Alzheimer Disease/epidemiology , Dementia/epidemiology , Dementia/drug therapy , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Prevalence , Lithium/therapeutic use , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Lithium (Li) is the first-line treatment for bipolar disorder (BD) even though only 30 % of BD patients are considered excellent responders. The mechanisms by which Li exerts its action are not clearly understood, but it has been suggested that specific epigenetic mechanisms, such as methylation processes, may play a role. In this regard, DNA methylation patterns can be used to estimate epigenetic age (EpiAge), which is accelerated in BD patients and reversed by Li treatment. Our first aim was to compare the DNA methylation profile in peripheral blood between BD patients categorized as excellent responders to Li (Ex-Rp) and non-responders (N-Rp). Secondly, EpiAge was estimated to detect differential age acceleration between the two groups. A total of 130 differentially methylated positions (DMPs) and 16 differentially methylated regions (DMRs) between Ex-Rp (n = 26) and N-Rp (n = 37) were identified (FDR adjusted p-value < 0.05). We found 122 genes mapping the DMPs and DMRs, nine of which (HOXB6, HOXB3, HOXB-AS3, TENM2, CACNA1B, ANK3, EEF2K, CYP1A1, and SORCS2) had previously been linked to Li response. We found genes related to the GSK3ß pathway to be highly represented. Using FUMA, we found enrichment in Gene Ontology Cell Component for the synapse. Gene network analysis highlighted functions related to the cell cycle, nervous system development and function, and gene expression. No significant differences in age acceleration were found between Ex-Rp and N-Rp for any of the epigenetic clocks analysed. Our findings indicate that a specific methylation pattern could determine the response to Li in BD patients. We also found that a significant portion of the differentially methylated genes are closely associated with the GSK3ß pathway, reinforcing the role of this system in Li response. Future longitudinal studies with larger samples will help to elucidate the epigenetic mechanisms underlying Li response.
Subject(s)
Aging , Bipolar Disorder , DNA Methylation , Epigenesis, Genetic , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , DNA Methylation/drug effects , Female , Epigenesis, Genetic/drug effects , Epigenesis, Genetic/genetics , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Aging/genetics , Epigenome/genetics , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/pharmacologyABSTRACT
Bipolar disorder is associated with increased rates of many physical disorders, but the effects of medication are unclear. We systematically investigated the associations between sustained use of first line maintenance agents, lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, and the risk of physical disorders using a nation-wide population-based target trial emulation covering the entire 5.9 million inhabitants in Denmark. We identified two cohorts. Cohort 1: patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder prior to first purchase (N = 12.607). Cohort 2: all 156.678 adult patients who had their first ever purchase (since 1995) of either lithium, lamotrigine or valproate between 1997 and 2021 regardless of diagnosis. Main analyses investigated the effect of sustained exposure defined as exposure for all consecutive 6-months periods during a 10-year follow-up. Outcomes included a diagnosis of incident stroke, arteriosclerosis, angina pectoris, myocardial infarction, diabetes mellitus, myxedema, osteoporosis, dementia, Parkinson's disease, chronic kidney disease and cancer (including subtypes). In both Cohorts 1 and 2, there were no systematic statistically significant differences in associations between sustained use of lithium versus lamotrigine and valproate, respectively, and any physical disorder, including subtypes of disorders, except myxedema, for which exposure to lithium increased the absolute risk of myxedema with 7-10 % compared with lamotrigine or valproate. In conclusion, these analyses emulating a target trial of "real world" observational register-based data show that lithium does not increase the risk of developing any kind of physical disorders, except myxedema, which may be a result of detection bias.
Subject(s)
Anticonvulsants , Bipolar Disorder , Lamotrigine , Humans , Female , Male , Denmark/epidemiology , Middle Aged , Anticonvulsants/adverse effects , Anticonvulsants/therapeutic use , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Lamotrigine/adverse effects , Lamotrigine/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/adverse effects , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Cohort Studies , Lithium Compounds/adverse effects , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Valproic Acid/adverse effects , Valproic Acid/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study was to determine whether the clinical profiles of bipolar disorder (BD) patients could be differentiated more clearly using the existing classification by diagnostic subtype or by lithium treatment responsiveness. METHODS: We included adult patients with BD-I or II (N = 477 across four sites) who were treated with lithium as their principal mood stabilizer for at least 1 year. Treatment responsiveness was defined using the dichotomized Alda score. We performed hierarchical clustering on phenotypes defined by 40 features, covering demographics, clinical course, family history, suicide behaviour, and comorbid conditions. We then measured the amount of information that inferred clusters carried about (A) BD subtype and (B) lithium responsiveness using adjusted mutual information (AMI) scores. Detailed phenotypic profiles across clusters were then evaluated with univariate comparisons. RESULTS: Two clusters were identified (n = 56 and n = 421), which captured significantly more information about lithium responsiveness (AMI range: 0.033 to 0.133) than BD subtype (AMI: 0.004 to 0.011). The smaller cluster had disproportionately more lithium responders (n = 47 [83.8%]) when compared to the larger cluster (103 [24.4%]; p = 0.006). CONCLUSIONS: Phenotypes derived from detailed clinical data may carry more information about lithium responsiveness than the current classification of diagnostic subtype. These findings support lithium responsiveness as a valid approach to stratification in clinical samples.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Lithium Compounds , Phenotype , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/classification , Bipolar Disorder/diagnosis , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Cluster Analysis , Lithium Compounds/pharmacology , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Immune imbalances are associated with the pathogenesis and pharmacological efficacy of bipolar disorder (BD). The underlying mechanisms remain largely obscure but may involve immunometabolic dysfunctions of T-lymphocytes. METHODS: We investigated if inflammatory cytokines and the immunometabolic function of T-lymphocytes, including frequencies of subsets, mitochondrial mass (MM), and low mitochondrial membrane potential (MMPLow) differed between BD patients (n = 47) and healthy controls (HC, n = 43). During lithium treatment of hospitalized patients (n = 33), the association between weekly T-lymphocyte immune metabolism and clinical symptoms was analyzed, and preliminary explorations on possible mechanisms were conducted. RESULTS: In comparison to HC, BD patients predominantly showed a trend toward CD4+ naïve T (Tn) activation and exhibited mitochondrial metabolic disturbances such as decreased MM and increased MMPLow. Lower CD4+ Tn-MM correlated with elevated IL-6, IL-8, and decreased IL-17 A in BD patients. With lithium treatment effective, MM of CD4+ T/Tn was negatively correlated with depression score HAMD. When lithium intolerance was present, MM of CD4+ T/Tn was positively correlated with depression score HAMD and mania score BRMS. Lithium does not mediate through the inositol depletion hypothesis, but the mRNA level of IMPA2 in peripheral blood is associated with mitochondrial function in CD8+ T cells. LIMITATIONS: The cross-sectional design and short-term follow-up meant that we could not directly examine the causality of BD and immune dysregulation. CONCLUSION: The altered metabolism of CD4+ Tn was strongly associated with remodeling of the inflammatory landscape in BD patients and can also be used to reflect the short-term therapeutic effects of lithium.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Humans , Bipolar Disorder/genetics , Lithium/pharmacology , Lithium/therapeutic use , CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Cross-Sectional Studies , Mitochondria/metabolism , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/pharmacologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Lithium is an effective psychoactive drug. It has a narrow therapeutic margin, with subtherapeutic levels or intoxication commonly occurring. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of lithium has several barriers. This scoping review aims to describe and analyze existing and emerging technologies for lithium TDM and to describe the lithium quantification parameters (precision, accuracy, detection limit) attributed to each technology. METHOD: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar were searched. Studies that described lithium quantification and complied with PRISMA-ScR guidelines were included. Articles selection was conducted by 2 researchers. Good precision was defined if its relative standard deviation <3%; acceptable, from 3% to 5%; and low, >5%. Accuracy was considered good if the error <5%; acceptable, 5%1 to 0%; and low if it was >10%. RESULTS: Of the 2008 articles found, 22 met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 studies concerned laboratory devices, in which precision was found to be low in one third of cases, and half had good precision. Accuracy of one third was good, another third was low, and the remaining third did not report accuracy. The other 8 studies concerned portable devices, in which precision was low in more than 60% of the cases and good in 25% of the studies. Accuracy was low in 50% of the cases, and good in just over a third. Limits of detection included the therapeutic range of lithium in all studies. CONCLUSIONS: Among emerging technologies for lithium TDM, precision and accuracy remain a challenge, particularly for portable devices.
Subject(s)
Drug Monitoring , Humans , Drug Monitoring/methods , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , Lithium/therapeutic use , Lithium/bloodABSTRACT
The role of lithium as a possible therapeutic strategy for neurodegenerative diseases has generated scientific interest. We systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed pre-clinical and clinical studies that evidenced the neuroprotective effects of lithium in Alzheimer's (AD) and Parkinson's disease (PD). We followed the PRISMA guidelines and performed the systematic literature search using PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. A total of 32 articles were identified. Twenty-nine studies were performed in animal models and 3 studies were performed on human samples of AD. A total of 17 preclinical studies were included in the meta-analysis. Our analysis showed that lithium treatment has neuroprotective effects in diseases. Lithium treatment reduced amyloid-ß and tau levels and significantly improved cognitive behavior in animal models of AD. Lithium increased the tyrosine hydroxylase levels and improved motor behavior in the PD model. Despite fewer clinical studies on these aspects, we evidenced the positive effects of lithium in AD patients. This study lends further support to the idea of lithium's therapeutic potential in neurodegenerative diseases.
Subject(s)
Alzheimer Disease , Neurodegenerative Diseases , Neuroprotective Agents , Parkinson Disease , Animals , Humans , Parkinson Disease/drug therapy , Lithium/pharmacology , Lithium/therapeutic use , Alzheimer Disease/drug therapy , Neuroprotective Agents/pharmacology , Neuroprotective Agents/therapeutic use , Neurodegenerative Diseases/drug therapy , Lithium Compounds/pharmacology , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
Tay-Sachs disease is a rare lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) caused by a mutation in the HexA gene coding ß-hexosaminidase A enzyme. The disruption of the HexA gene causes the accumulation of GM2 ganglioside resulting in progressive neurodegeneration in humans. Surprisingly, Hexa-/- mice did not show neurological phenotypes. Our group recently generated a murine model of Tay-Sachs disease exhibiting excessive GM2 accumulation and severe neuropathological abnormalities mimicking Tay-Sachs patients. Previously, we reported impaired autophagic flux in the brain of Hexa/-Neu3-/- mice. However, regulation of autophagic flux using inducers has not been clarified in Tay-Sachs disease cells. Here, we evaluated the effects of lithium treatment on dysfunctional autophagic flux using LC3 and p62 in the fibroblast and neuroglia of Hexa-/-Neu3-/- mice and Tay-Sachs patients. We discovered the clearance of accumulating autophagosomes, aggregate-prone metabolites, and GM2 ganglioside under lithium-induced conditions. Our data suggest that targeting autophagic flux with an autophagy inducer might be a rational therapeutic strategy for the treatment of Tay-Sachs disease.
Subject(s)
Tay-Sachs Disease , Humans , Mice , Animals , Tay-Sachs Disease/drug therapy , Tay-Sachs Disease/genetics , Lithium/pharmacology , Lithium/therapeutic use , G(M2) Ganglioside , Autophagy , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic use , beta-N-Acetylhexosaminidases/genetics , beta-N-Acetylhexosaminidases/metabolism , beta-N-Acetylhexosaminidases/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: As clinical practices with lithium salts for patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BD) are poorly documented in Asia, we studied the prevalence and clinical correlates of lithium use there to support international comparisons. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of use and dosing of lithium salts for BD patients across 13 Asian sites and evaluated bivariate relationships of lithium treatment with clinical correlates followed by multivariate logistic regression modeling. RESULTS: In a total of 2139 BD participants (52.3% women) of mean age 42.4 years, lithium salts were prescribed in 27.3% of cases overall, varying among regions from 3.20% to 59.5%. Associated with lithium treatment were male sex, presence of euthymia or mild depression, and a history of seasonal mood change. Other mood stabilizers usually were given with lithium, often at relatively high doses. Lithium use was associated with newly emerging and dose-dependent risk of tremors as well as risk of hypothyroidism. We found no significant differences in rates of clinical remission or of suicidal behavior if treatment included lithium or not. CONCLUSIONS: Study findings clarify current prevalence, dosing, and clinical correlates of lithium treatment for BD in Asia. This information should support clinical decision-making regarding treatment of BD patients and international comparisons of therapeutic practices.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Bipolar Disorder/epidemiology , Bipolar Disorder/chemically induced , Lithium/therapeutic use , Cross-Sectional Studies , Pharmacoepidemiology , Salts/therapeutic use , Antimanic Agents/therapeutic use , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Mnemonic discrimination (MD), the ability to discriminate new stimuli from similar memories, putatively involves dentate gyrus pattern separation. Since lithium may normalize dentate gyrus functioning in lithium-responsive bipolar disorder (BD), we hypothesized that lithium treatment would be associated with better MD in lithium-responsive BD patients. METHODS: BD patients (N = 69; NResponders = 16 [23 %]) performed the Continuous Visual Memory Test (CVMT), which requires discriminating between novel and previously seen images. Before testing, all patients had prophylactic lithium responsiveness assessed over ≥1 year of therapy (with the Alda Score), although only thirty-eight patients were actively prescribed lithium at time of testing (55 %; 12/16 responders, 26/53 nonresponders). We then used computational modelling to extract patient-specific MD indices. Linear models were used to test how (A) lithium treatment, (B) lithium responsiveness via the continuous Alda score, and (C) their interaction, affected MD. RESULTS: Superior MD performance was associated with lithium treatment exclusively in lithium-responsive patients (Lithium x AldaScore ß = 0.257 [SE 0.078], p = 0.002). Consistent with prior literature, increased age was associated with worse MD (ß = -0.03 [SE 0.01], p = 0.005). LIMITATIONS: Secondary pilot analysis of retrospectively collected data in a cross-sectional design limits generalizability. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to examine MD performance in BD. Lithium is associated with better MD performance only in lithium responders, potentially due to lithium's effects on dentate gyrus granule cell excitability. Our results may influence the development of behavioural probes for dentate gyrus neuronal hyperexcitability in BD.
Subject(s)
Bipolar Disorder , Lithium , Humans , Lithium/therapeutic use , Lithium/pharmacology , Bipolar Disorder/drug therapy , Pilot Projects , Retrospective Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Lithium Compounds/therapeutic useABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Lithium is considered the gold standard for the treatment of bipolar affective disorder for the prevention of recurrence of manic and depressive episodes and for augmentation treatment in unipolar severe depressive episodes. The indications for treatment with lithium do not differ for older or younger patients. Nevertheless, there are a number of aspects to be considered with respect to drug safety in the group of old patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to give an overview of the current literature on lithium treatment in old age and from this to derive recommendations for action. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A selective literature review on lithium treatment in old age was conducted to answer questions on drug safety, monitoring (particularly with respect to comorbidities) and potential alternatives to lithium. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Lithium is an effective and, if used correctly, safe drug also in old people; however, with respect to somatic comorbidities that increase with age, special caution is required when using lithium in order to prevent nephropathy and intoxication.