Analysis of the impact on efficacy of lubiprostone dose reduction to manage adverse events in the treatment of chronic constipation in Japan.

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes between two doses of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation (CC), to assess whether dose reduction affects efficacy. METHODS: This open-label exploratory study involved 146 patients with CC treated initially with lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily for a planned duration of 4 weeks. Patients who experienced adverse events (AEs) had their dose reduced to 12 mcg twice daily (for 4 weeks). RESULTS: Lubiprostone dose was unchanged in 104 patients and reduced due to AEs in 42 patients. Significant differences in the mean number of bowel movements per week favored the dose-reduced group at Week 1 and end of follow-up. No between-group differences were observed over time for mean number of days per week with bowel movements or mean Bristol Stool Form Scale scores. Symptoms of abdominal bloating, strained defecation, and sensation of incomplete evacuation improved in both groups. Before dose reduction, nausea was reported by 64.3% and diarrhea by 45.2% of patients in the dose-reduced group; after dose reduction, no patients reported nausea and one patient reported diarrhea. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction of lubiprostone reduced the incidence of AEs, with no compromise to efficacy, and may be a suitable approach for patients who develop AEs during treatment.

Evaluation of efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in patients with chronic constipation.

OBJECTIVES: Lubiprostone is an apical type 2 chloride channel activator approved for the treatment of chronic constipation (CC), and nausea is the most common adverse symptom. However, the associated factors with the efficacy and the precise mechanism of nausea remain unclear. The aim of this study is to characterize clinical backgrounds related with the efficacy and the adverse symptoms of lubiprostone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects were patients with CC who were prescribed lubiprostone from April 2017 to October 2019. The efficacy and safety of lubiprostone were retrospectively examined using the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Hundred and fifty-five patients (76 men, and mean age 69) were evaluated. Lubiprostone was effective in 74 patients (47.8%), and the discontinuation due to adverse in 34 patients (21.9%). including nausea, diarrhea and abdominal pain in 16, 12 and 3 patients, respectively. The efficacy was significantly associated with gender, age, body mass index (BMI), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, calcium channel blockers and antipsychotics. In multivariate analysis, the efficacy was significantly associated with men (odds ratio [OR], 3.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.42-7.27) and BMI (OR, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.02-1.28). The incidence of nausea was higher in patients under 65 years old, and hypertension was the significant protective factor for nausea. CONCLUSIONS: Lubiprostone was effective for men patients with CC, and hypertension seems to be the protective factor for nausea.

Safety of elobixibat and lubiprostone in Japanese patients with chronic constipation: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: We aimed to discuss and compare reported adverse reactions and drug add-ons associated with elobixibat and lubiprostone use in chronic constipation treatment, as the safety of these drugs has not been well examined in post-marketing clinical settings. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, using records of community pharmacies in Japan, we identified new users of elobixibat and lubiprostone. The Japan Pharmaceutical Association sent questionnaires regarding baseline and event data to community pharmacists. The incidence of events and hazard ratio (HR) associated with the study drugs were evaluated. RESULTS: New users of elobixibat (n = 979) and lubiprostone (n = 829) were identified (mean age: 74 and 77 years; females: 59% and 53%, respectively). Although the crude risk ratio of adverse events for elobixibat was 0.79 (95% confidence interval: 0.63-0.99), there was no significant difference in the HR for any of the common events, including drug add-ons (n ≥ 5), compared with those for lubiprostone. CONCLUSION: No new safety concerns have been raised in relation to elobixibat and lubiprostone use for treating chronic constipation, although the HR of different events varied. Further larger-scale study is needed as the estimates for events of small numbers were unstable.

Risk Factors for Adverse Events in Patients with Chronic Constipation Following Lubiprostone Administration.

INTRODUCTION: Lubiprostone is an effective treatment of chronic constipation (CC). However, as with other stimulant or osmotic laxatives, adverse events (AEs) can make it difficult to continue treatment. This article investigates AE risk factors associated with lubiprostone. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed all 1,338 Japanese patients with CC treated at our hospital from October 2013 to July 2017. All patients were diagnosed with constipation as defined by the Roma III criteria. Enrolled patients received lubiprostone orally (24 or 48 µg daily), after which we investigated the incidence of AEs. The causative factors for diarrhea and nausea, the most common AEs, were examined by the backward logistic regression model. RESULTS: Two hundred eight (15.5%) experienced at least 1 AE. No serious AEs were associated with the study drug. The AEs reported by >1% of patients overall were diarrhea (6.1%) and nausea (4.2%). We performed a multivariate logistic regression using a backward variable selection method to investigate AE risk factors. Factors associated with higher incidence of diarrhea were patient age of 65 years or more (odds ratio: [95% confidence interval]; p value) (2.09: [1.05-4.16]; 0.035). Factors associated with greater likelihood of nausea included female gender (1.99: [1.10-3.61]; 0.023), and the chief complaint was a patient complaining of abdominal pain and fullness (2.07: [1.01-4.22]; 0.046). CONCLUSIONS: Understanding AE risk factors can help avoid unnecessary AEs and promote more effective treatment.

Open-label study to evaluate the treatment continuation rate after a dose reduction of lubiprostone due to onset of adverse events.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the continuation rate with a reduced lubiprostone dose (12 mcg twice daily, BD) after the onset of adverse events (AEs) in patients with chronic constipation (CC). METHODS: In this exploratory, open-label, multicenter study, patients with CC received lubiprostone 24 mcg BD and the dose was reduced to 12 mcg BD in subjects experiencing AEs. The primary objective was the continuation rate after dose reduction due to nausea/vomiting. Secondary objectives included the continuation rate after dose reduction due to diarrhea/any AE and efficacy, including changes in number of weekly bowel movements and Bristol Stool Form Scale. RESULTS: Of the 146 patients included in the study, 42 (28.8%) received lubiprostone 12 mcg BD (dose-reduced group) due to any AE. Thirty-six (85.7%) subjects in the dose-reduced group continued treatment and completed the study. 22/27 (81.5%) and 17/19 (89.5%) patients in whom the dose was reduced due to nausea/vomiting or diarrhea, respectively, continued treatment. There was no clinically relevant difference in efficacy after dose reduction. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that treatment withdrawal due to AEs associated with lubiprostone 24 mcg BD could be minimized in patients with CC after dose reduction to 12 mcg BD, thus resulting in improved long-term outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCTs031180069).

The Efficacy and Safety of Lubiprostone for Constipation in Cancer Patients Compared with Non-cancer Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Lubiprostone is an effective drug for various types of constipation in patients without cancer; however, there is no report on its efficacy and safety in patients with cancer. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lubiprostone for constipation in cancer patients. We retrospectively studied 124 patients (cancer, N = 67) who were treated with lubiprostone for constipation in our hospital between June 2013 and May 2016. The number of bowel movements (BMs) increased in the both the cancer and non-cancer groups. The mean change in BM frequency did not differ between the two groups. Approximately 70% of patients in both groups had an initial BM within 24 h after administration of lubiprostone. The most common lubiprostone-related adverse events in both groups were diarrhea (38.8 vs. 14%), and nausea (22.4 vs. 8.8%). No lubiprostone-related serious adverse events occurred. Discontinuation due to the side effects of lubiprostone was more frequent in cancer patients (p = 0.023). Logistic regression analysis showed that the risk of discontinuation of lubiprostone in cancer patients was high in patients with a body-mass index (BMI) <22, and low in patients using opioids and magnesium oxide dosage ≥1000 mg/d. Our study showed that while lubiprostone was as effective in cancer patients as in non-cancer patients, in cancer patients it was associated with a high incidence of diarrhea and nausea side effects and warranted caution, especially in patients with a low BMI.

Lubiprostone in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a trial.

BACKGROUND: The laxative drug lubiprostone improves intestinal permeability in healthy volunteers. We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of lubiprostone in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with constipation via attenuation of intestinal permeability. METHODS: This randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study in Yokohama City University Hospital, Japan, recruited patients (aged 20-85 years) with NAFLD and constipation, alanine aminotransferase (ALT) at least 40 U/L, liver stiffness (≤6·7 kPa), and hepatic fat fraction at least 5·2% when assessed by MRI-proton density fat fraction. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (11:10:9) by a computer-based system and stratified by age and sex to receive 24 µg lubiprostone, 12 µg lubiprostone, or placebo, orally, once per day for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was the absolute changes in ALT at 12 weeks. Efficacy analysis was done by intention to treat. Safety was assessed in all treated patients. This trial was registered with University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000026635). FINDINGS: Between March 24, 2017, and April 3, 2018, we screened 288 patients, of whom 150 (52%) were randomly assigned to treatment: 55 patients were assigned to receive 24 µg lubiprostone, 50 to receive 12 µg lubiprostone, and 45 to receive placebo. A greater decrease in the absolute ALT levels from baseline to 12 weeks was seen in the 24 µg lubiprostone group (mean -13 U/L [SD 19]) than in the placebo group (1 U/L [24]; mean difference -15 U/L [95% CI -23 to -6], p=0·0007) and in the 12 µg lubiprostone group (-12 U/L [21]) than in the placebo group (mean difference -13 U/L [-22 to -5], p=0·0023). 18 (33%) of 55 patients in the 24 µg group had at least one adverse event, as did three (6%) of 47 patients in the 12 µg group and three (7%) of 43 in the placebo group. The most common adverse event was diarrhoea (17 [31%] of patients in the 24 µg group, three [6%] in the 12 µg group, none in the placebo group). No life-threatening events or treatment-related deaths occurred. INTERPRETATION: Lubiprostone was well tolerated and reduced the levels of liver enzymes in patients with NAFLD and constipation. Further studies are necessary to better define the efficacy and tolerability of lubiprostone in patients with NAFLD without constipation. FUNDING: Mylan EPD G.K.

Symptomatic hyponatremia: a rare but reversible adverse reaction of lubiprostone.

Several intestinal secretagogues became available for the patients with irritable bowel syndrome. We report a case of symptomatic hyponatremia after lubiprostone ingestion. A male patient was visiting our office to manage chronic kidney disease. He suffered chronic hepatitis (type C), which was successfully treated with asunaprevir and daclatasvir. He took lubiprostone due to constipation, and then watery diarrhoea was frequently developed. Next morning, he came to our hospital due to consciousness disturbance. Physical examination showed dehydration and laboratory data exhibited hyponatremia (110 mEq/L). Subsequent treatment against hypovolemic hyponatremia recovered his consciousness without any sequels. This case suggests that intestinal secretagogues can accompany severe electrolyte disturbance. Potential mechanisms for hyponatremia were discussed.

Response to lubiprostone in chronic constipation is associated with increased mucus and mucin output: a randomized clinical trial.

.

Efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lubiprostone for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in adult patients with constipation: The LUBIPRONE, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled study design.

BACKGROUND: This paper reports the protocol of a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study to test the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of lubiprostone (LUB) vs. placebo on suppressing gut permeability in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients with constipation. NAFLD, including non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), is a common chronic liver disorder. Progression is associated with increased gut permeability and gut-derived endotoxins. Most NAFLD/NASH clinical trial drugs aim to improve liver function or systemic metabolism. LUB is a type 2 chloride channel activator used as a laxative for the treatment of patients with constipation. LUB suppresses gut permeability induced by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in healthy volunteers and lowers blood endotoxin levels. There have been no clinical studies of LUB for NAFLD/NASH patients. METHODS: The study plans to enrol adult patients (20-85 years, planned enrolment, n = 150; planned sample size, n = 120) with NAFLD and constipation, alanine aminotransferase ≥40 IU/L, equivalent steatosis grade ≥1, and equivalent fibrosis stage <4 measured using non-invasive vibration-controlled transient elastography and magnetic resonance imaging. Participants will be randomly allocated into three groups: LUB 12 µg, LUB 24 µg, and a placebo group. RESULTS: The primary endpoint will be changes in alanine aminotransferase from baseline at 12 weeks. The main secondary endpoint will be changes in intestinal permeability from baseline at 12 weeks using the lactulose mannitol ratio. CONCLUSIONS: This study will determine whether LUB improves gut permeability in NAFLD patients with constipation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial is registered in the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN) Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000026635).

Impact of lubiprostone on gastric-emptying profile and the possible effect of concomitant domperidone in healthy adults
.

BACKGROUND: Lubiprostone is effective for patients with chronic constipation. This agent sometimes causes upper gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea, which is one of the chief reasons for discontinuation. However, the etiology of and strategy against bothersome gastrointestinal symptoms of lubiprostone remain unclear. AIMS: The goal of this study was to investigate the influence of lubiprostone on the gastric-emptying profile of healthy adults. The effect of domperidone on gastric emptying and gastrointestinal symptoms after lubiprostone administration were also assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 80 healthy male participants underwent 13C acetate breath testing to evaluate gastric emptying. The test meal comprised 200 kcal of a standard liquid nutrient. Each participant underwent 3 random breath tests with: 1) no premedication; 2) 24 µg of lubiprostone 30 minutes prior to the study; and 3) 24 µg of lubiprostone plus 10 mg of domperidone 30 minutes prior to the study. Gastrointestinal symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation, epigastric pain, fullness, distress feeling) during testing were evaluated using a 7-point scoring system. RESULTS: Gastric emptying was significantly delayed by the administration of lubiprostone. Among all 8 subjects, 4 reported heartburn after taking lubiprostone, whereas this symptom was not found when subjects received concomitant domperidone. However, gastric emptying showed little change between lubiprostone alone and lubiprostone plus domperidone. CONCLUSION: Lubiprostone delayed gastric emptying of liquid in healthy adults, which could be associated with the gastrointestinal symptoms caused by the agent. Domperidone seemed effective against such gastrointestinal symptoms after administration of lubiprostone. This effect seemed unrelated to gastric motility.
.

Analysis of Nausea in Clinical Studies of Lubiprostone for the Treatment of Constipation Disorders.

BACKGROUND: Lubiprostone is a ClC-2 chloride channel activator approved for the treatment of chronic idiopathic constipation (CIC) and opioid-induced constipation (OIC) in adults and irritable bowel syndrome with constipation (IBS-C) in women. Lubiprostone is generally well tolerated, with nausea being the most common adverse event. AIMS: To characterize nausea with lubiprostone using pooled results from clinical studies in patients with CIC, OIC, or IBS-C. METHODS: Data from three 3- and 4-week placebo-controlled studies and three long-term open-label studies were pooled for the CIC analysis. The OIC and IBS-C analyses each used pooled data from three 12-week placebo-controlled studies and one 36-week open-label extension study. RESULTS: The populations included the following numbers of patients: CIC, 316 (placebo) and 1113 (lubiprostone 24 mcg twice daily [BID]); OIC, 652 (placebo) and 889 (lubiprostone 24 mcg BID); and IBS-C, 435 (placebo) and 1011 (lubiprostone 8 mcg BID). The incidence of nausea in lubiprostone-treated patients ranged from 11.4 to 31.1%, with the highest incidence in patients with CIC. Among patients with any nausea, most reported only mild or moderate severity (96.5-99.1% across indications) and only one event (83.6-88.7%); most events occurred within the first 5 days of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Nausea was the most common adverse event following the treatment with lubiprostone. Event rates varied by indication and dose, and the majority of nausea adverse events were mild to moderate in severity. Nausea events predominantly occurred early in the treatment period in all of the pooled study populations.

Possible Effect of Concomitant Prokinetics and Herbal Medicines against Nausea in Patients Taking Lubiprostone.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Lubiprostone is a novel laxative that sometimes causes nausea, but preventive strategies remain unconfirmed. METHODS: We retrospectively chose 126 patients prescribed lubiprostone from 2013 to 2016. Medical records were reviewed to clarify whether nausea developed after administration of the drug. Background characteristics, including concomitant medicines, were also reviewed. RESULTS: The most common adverse symptom was diarrhea (23.8%). Nausea occurred in 16 patients (12.7%). Patients taking either prokinetics or herbal medicines or both were unlikely to develop nausea (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant prokinetics and/or herbal medicines may help alleviate lubiprostone-induced nausea.

Novel Oral Therapies for Opioid-induced Bowel Dysfunction in Patients with Chronic Noncancer Pain.

Opioid analgesics are frequently prescribed and play an important role in chronic pain management. Opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, which includes constipation, hardened stool, incomplete evacuation, gas, and nausea and vomiting, is the most common adverse event associated with opioid use. Mu-opioid receptors are specifically responsible for opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, resulting in reduced peristaltic and secretory actions. Agents that reverse these actions in the bowel without reversing pain control in the central nervous system may be preferred over traditional laxatives. The efficacy and safety of these agents in chronic noncancer pain were assessed from publications identified through Ovid and PubMed database searches. Trials that evaluated the safety and efficacy of oral agents for opioid-induced constipation or opioid-induced bowel dysfunction, excluding laxatives, were reviewed. Lubiprostone and naloxegol are approved in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration for use in opioid-induced constipation. Axelopran (TD-1211) and sustained-release naloxone have undergone phase 2 and phase 1 studies, respectively, for the same indication. Naloxegol and axelopran are peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonists. Naloxone essentially functions as a peripherally acting µ-opioid receptor antagonist when administered orally in a sustained-release formulation. Lubiprostone is a locally acting chloride channel (CIC-2) activator that increases secretions and peristalsis. All agents increase spontaneous bowel movements and reduce other bowel symptoms compared with placebo in patients with noncancer pain who are chronic opioid users. The most common adverse events were gastrointestinal in nature, and none of the drugs were associated with severe adverse or cardiovascular events. Investigations comparing these agents to regimens using standard laxative and combination therapy and trials in special populations and patients with active cancer are needed to further define their role in therapy.

Lubiprostone plus PEG electrolytes versus placebo plus PEG electrolytes for outpatient colonoscopy preparation: a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial.

Bowel preparation using large volume of polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions is often poorly tolerated. Therefore, there are ongoing efforts to develop an alternative bowel cleansing regimen that should be equally effective and better tolerated. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of lubiprostone (versus placebo) plus PEG as a bowel cleansing preparation for colonoscopy. Our study was a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled design. Patients scheduled for screening colonoscopy were randomized 1:1 to lubiprostone (group 1) or placebo (group 2) plus 1 gallon of PEG. The primary endpoints were patient's tolerability and endoscopist's evaluation of the preparation quality. The secondary endpoint was to determine any reduction in the amount of PEG consumed in the lubiprostone group compared with the placebo group. One hundred twenty-three patients completed the study and were included in the analysis. There was no difference in overall cleanliness. The volume of PEG was similar in both the groups. The volume of PEG approached significance as a predictor of improved score for both the groups (P = 0.054). Lubiprostone plus PEG was similar to placebo plus PEG in colon cleansing and volume of PEG consumed. The volume of PEG consumed showed a trend toward improving the quality of the colon cleansing.