Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 59
Filter
1.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 46, 2022 Jan 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35086515

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The usefulness and safety of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) for reassessment of diffuse parenchymal lung disease (DPLD) with progression is still unknown. Our purpose was to clarify the usefulness and safety of TBLC for reassessment of DPLD with progression. METHODS: This retrospective study included 31 patients with DPLD diagnosed by surgical lung biopsy who progressed in the clinical course and underwent TBLC for reassessment between January 2017 and September 2019 at Kanagawa Cardiovascular & Respiratory Center. Two pulmonologists independently selected the clinical diagnosis, treatment strategy, and confidence level of the treatment strategy based on clinical and radiological information with and without pathological information from TBLC. A consensus was reached among the pulmonologists regarding the clinical diagnosis, treatment strategy, and confidence level of the treatment strategy. Complications of TBLC were also examined. RESULTS: Seven (22.6%), 5 (16.1%), and 6 (19.4%) of clinical diagnosis was changed after TBLC for Pulmonologist A, for Pulmonologist B, and for consensus, respectively. The treatment strategy was changed in 7 (22.6%), 8 (25.9%), and 6 (19.4%) cases after TBLC for Pulmonologist A, for Pulmonologist B and for consensus, respectively. The definite or high confidence level of the consensus treatment strategy was 54.8% (17/31) without TBLC and 83.9% (26/31) with TBLC. There were 6 cases of moderate bleeding, but no other complications were noted. CONCLUSIONS: Pathological information from TBLC may contribute to decision-making in treatment strategies for the progression of DPLD, and it may be safely performed.


Subject(s)
Biopsy/methods , Bronchoscopy/methods , Decision Making , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/pathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Pulmonologists/psychology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Disease Progression , Female , Humans , Japan , Lung/pathology , Lung/surgery , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies
2.
Ir Med J ; 114(7): 410, 2021 08 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34520645

ABSTRACT

Aim To gain an understanding of the impact of COVID-19 on the daily life, healthcare needs, mental wellbeing and outlook of patients with Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) and their caregivers. Methods ILD patients and caregivers were invited to participate in a quantitative survey. Respondents could self-select to then participate in in-depth structured telephone interviews. Survey data was compared to Department of Health COVID-19 public opinion tracker findings for the comparable time period. Results There were 170 survey respones (111 patients and 59 caregivers) and 14 in-depth interview participants. 32% (n=36) of patients and 42% (n=25) of caregivers expressed extreme worry regarding COVID-19 on a 1-10 scale. 83% (n=92) of patients expressed concern about safe hospital access, 33% (n=37) had received a telephone consultation with their clinician, 43% (n=48) reported test delays, 47% (n=52) were exercising less, 23% (n=26) reported worse sleep and 15% (n=17) reported being financially worse off. Carers reported that sleep was worse for 58% (n=34), 42% (n=25) reported being worse off financially, and 40% (n=24) reported a worse diet. Worry (66%, n=39), stress (51%, n=30), anxiety (49%, n=29) were commonly reported by carers. Discussion ILD patients and caregivers reported higher levels of worry regarding COVID-19 compared to the general public. Alternative pathways for quality ILD patient care and interventions to reduce the burden of care on ILD caregivers are required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/psychology , Caregivers/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/nursing , Male , Middle Aged , Needs Assessment
3.
Respir Res ; 22(1): 247, 2021 Sep 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34535127

ABSTRACT

Social media is an increasingly popular source of health information, and the rarity and complexity of interstitial lung disease (ILD) may particularly draw patients with ILD to social media for information and support. The objective of this viewpoint is to provide an overview of social media, explore the benefits and limitations of ILD-related social media use, and discuss future development of healthcare information on social media. We describe the value of integrating social media into the practice of ILD health professionals, including its role in information dissemination, patient engagement, knowledge generation, and formation of health policy. We also describe major challenges to expanded social media use in ILD, including limited access for some individuals and populations, abundance of misinformation, and concerns about patient privacy. Finally, for healthcare professionals looking to join social media, we provide practical guidance and considerations to optimize the potential benefits and minimize the potential pitfalls of social media.


Subject(s)
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Health Personnel/trends , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Patient Participation/trends , Social Media/trends , Communication , Health Personnel/psychology , Health Personnel/standards , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Patient Participation/psychology , Social Media/standards
4.
BMJ Open Respir Res ; 8(1)2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33762360

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: SARS-CoV-2 has restricted access to face-to-face delivery of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Evidence suggests that telehealth-PR is non-inferior to outpatient PR. However, it is unknown whether patients who have been referred to face-to-face programmes can feasibly complete an online-PR programme. METHODS: This service evaluation used a mixed-methods approach to investigate a rapid PR service remodelling using the University of Gloucestershire eLearn Moodle platform. Quantitative baseline demographic and PR outcome data were collected from online-PR participants, and semistructured interviews were completed with PR staff and participants. RESULTS: Twenty-five individuals were eligible from a PR waiting list. Thirteen declined participation and 14 completed PR. Significant pre-post online PR improvements were achieved in 1 min sit-to-stand (CI 2.1 to 9 (p=0.004)), Generalised Anxiety Disorder (CI -0.3 to -2.6 (p=0.023)), Primary Health Questionnaire-9 (CI -0.3 to -5.1 (p=0.029)), Chronic Respiratory Questionnaire dyspnoea (CI 0.5 to 1.3 (p=0.001)), fatigue (CI 0.7 to 2 (p=0.0004)), emotion (CI 0.7 to 1.7 (p=0.0002)), mastery (CI 0.4 to 1.3 (p=0.001)). Interviews indicated that patient PR inclusion was made possible with digital support and a PR introduction session improved participant engagement and safety. Incremental progression of exercise was perceived as more successful online compared with face-to-face PR. However, perceptions were that education sessions were less successful. Online-PR required significant staff time resource. DISCUSSION: Online-PR improves patient outcomes and is feasible and acceptable for individuals referred for face-to-face PR in the context of a requirement for social distancing. Face-to-face programmes can be adapted in a rapid fashion with both staff and participants perceiving benefit. Future pragmatic trials are now warranted comparing online-PR including remote assessments to centre-based PR with suitably matched outcomes, and patient and staff perceptions sought regarding barriers and facilitators of online delivery.


Subject(s)
Internet , Physical Therapy Modalities , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/rehabilitation , Telerehabilitation/methods , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/psychology , Asthma/physiopathology , Asthma/psychology , Asthma/rehabilitation , COVID-19 , Depression/psychology , Exercise Tolerance , Feasibility Studies , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/rehabilitation , Male , Middle Aged , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Quality of Life , SARS-CoV-2 , Treatment Outcome
5.
Thorax ; 76(3): 248-255, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298580

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: There is limited knowledge regarding the quality of dying and death (QODD) and end-of-life interventions in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD). Hence, differences in QODD and end-of-life interventions between patients with ILD and those with lung cancer (LC) remain poorly understood. METHODS: The primary aim of this study was to explore the differences in QODD and end-of-life interventions among patients dying with ILD versus those dying with LC. We performed a mail survey to quantify the QODD of a bereaved family's perspective using the Good Death Inventory (GDI) score. Moreover, we examined the end-of-life interventions by medical chart review. RESULTS: Of 361 consecutive patients analysed for end-of-life interventions, 167 patients whose bereaved families completed questionnaires were analysed for QODD. Patients with ILD had lower GDI scores for QODD than those with LC (p=0.04), particularly in domains related to 'physical and psychological distress relief' and 'prognosis awareness and participation in decision making' (p=0.02, respectively). In end-of-life interventions, patients with ILD were less likely to receive specialised palliative care services (8.5% vs 54.3%; p<0.001) and opioids (58.2% vs 73.4%; p=0.003). Additionally, lower frequencies of participation of patients with ILD in end-of-life discussion were also observed (40.8% vs 62.4%; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: Patients with ILD had lower QODD and poorer access to palliative care and decision making than those with LC. Additional efforts to improve QODD in patients with ILD, particularly in symptom relief and decision-making processes, are urgently warranted.


Subject(s)
Family/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Lung Neoplasms/psychology , Terminal Care , Aged , Female , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Quality of Life , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Rate/trends
6.
Respir Res ; 21(1): 297, 2020 Nov 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33176795

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: As it is less known about the prevalence and characteristics of pain in the patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD), this paper aims at determining the characteristics of the pain in the patients with ILD. METHODS: Subjects with ILD and health controls with the matched ages and genders completed Short Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ) and part of the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form to elicit the characteristics of the pain. The patients with ILD were also assessed through Pulmonary Function Test, Six Minutes Walking Test (6MWT), modified Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale (mMRC) for state of the illness and measured health-related quality of life (HRQoL) by Short Form-36 (SF-36) and psychological associations by Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). RESULTS: A total of 63 subjects with ILD and 63 healthy controls (HC) were recruited in our study. The prevalence of the pain was 61.9% in ILD versus 25.3% in HC (P = 0.005) and the median score of the pain rank index (PRI) in ILD was higher than that in HC (P = 0.014). Chest (46.1%) accounted for the highest of overall pain locations in subjects with ILD. Associated clinical factors for pain intensity in the patients with ILD included exposure history of risk factors of ILD, with a longer distance of 6MWD (≥ 250 m), and a higher mMRC score (2-4). The patients with ILD and pain are more likely to suffer impaired HRQoL (P = 0.0014) and psychological problems (P = 0.0017, P = 0.044). CONCLUSION: The pain is common in those with ILD and the pain intensity is associated with exposure history, 6MWD, and mMRC score. The patients with ILD and pain were possibly to suffer depression, anxiety, and impaired HRQoL.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial/epidemiology , Pain/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , China/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Exercise Tolerance , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Male , Mental Health , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/physiopathology , Pain/psychology , Pain Measurement , Prevalence , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Risk Assessment , Risk Factors , Walk Test
7.
Monaldi Arch Chest Dis ; 90(4)2020 Oct 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33003695

ABSTRACT

Evaluation of mental health in chronic lung diseases like interstitial lung disease (ILD) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has always been neglected and underrated. The aim of the study was to determine the psychological morbidity in patients of ILD and to determine its various socio-clinical and psychological correlates. A cross-sectional clinic based descriptive study with 50 ILD patients, 30 COPD patients and 30 healthy controls was undertaken. Psychological distress was assessed using different psychological scales, like General Health Questionnaire-12 (GHQ-12), Patient Distress Thermometer (PDT), Coping Strategy Checklist (CSCL), WHO Quality of Life-Brief-26 (WHOQOL-Bref-26) and Depression Anxiety Stress Scale (DASS). The patients with a GHQ-12 score of ≥3 were considered as experiencing psychological distress and additionally referred to consultant psychiatrist for further detailed evaluation and management. Fifty-eight percent of ILD patients and 60% of COPD patients experienced psychological distress after screening with GHQ-12; 40% of all the ILD and COPD patients were ultimately diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder, after evaluation by the psychiatrist. Patients of ILD and COPD had significantly higher scores on GHQ-12, CSCL and DASS, and significantly lower scores on WHOQOL-Bref-26 when compared with healthy controls. However, these scores, including PDT did not differ significantly between ILD and COPD patients. The scores on all these scales in the patients of ILD and COPD who were experiencing psychological distress (GHQ ≥3) were significantly poorer than those without psychological distress (GHQ<3). GHQ-12 emerged as an excellent predictor of psychological morbidity. Various other psychological scales correlated with GHQ-12 and amongst each other in both the groups experiencing psychological distress. GHQ-12 and other different scales also significantly correlated with the different clinical indicators in ILD as well as COPD patients having psychological distress. Psychological distress and poorer quality of life was present in a significant percentage of ILD patients, and was comparable to that seen in COPD. Mental health evaluation should be incorporated in the routine management of these patients. Simple, easy and brief screening tools like GHQ-12 can be of immense help.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Aged , Case-Control Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , India/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Male , Mass Screening , Middle Aged , Morbidity , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/complications , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Quality of Life , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/etiology , Surveys and Questionnaires/statistics & numerical data
8.
Health Qual Life Outcomes ; 18(1): 334, 2020 Oct 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032602

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Health-related quality of life (HRQL) in interstitial lung disease (ILD) patients is impaired. We aimed to identify baseline predictors for HRQL decline within a 12-month observation period. METHODS: We analyzed 194 ILD patients from two German ILD-centers in the observational HILDA study. We employed the disease-specific King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) with the subdomains 'psychological impact', 'chest symptoms' and 'breathlessness and activities', and the generic EQ-5D Visual Analog Scale (VAS). We evaluated how many patients experienced a clinically meaningful decline in HRQL. Subsequently, we investigated medical and sociodemographic factors as potential predictors of HRQL deterioration. RESULTS: Within the study population (34.0% male, Ø age 61.7) mean HRQL scores hardly changed between baseline and follow up (K-BILD: 52.8 vs. 52.5 | VAS: 60.0 vs. 57.3). On the intra-individual level, 30.4% (n = 59) experienced a clinically relevant deterioration in K-BILD total score and 35.4% (n = 68) in VAS. Lower baseline forced vital capacity (FVC) % predicted determined HRQL decline in K-BILD total score (ß-coefficient: - 0.02, p = 0.007), VAS (ß-coefficient: - 0.03, p < 0.0001), and in the subdomain 'psychological impact' (ß-coefficient: - 0.02, p = 0.014). Lower baseline diffusing capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) % predicted determined deterioration in 'breathlessness and activities' (ß-coefficient: - 0.04, p = 0.003) and 'chest symptoms' (ß-coefficient: - 0.04, p = 0.002). Additionally, increasing age predicted decline in 'psychological impact' (ß-coefficient: 0.06, p < 0.007). CONCLUSION: Around a third of ILD patients experienced a clinically relevant HRQL deterioration in a 12-month period, which was associated with baseline lung function values in all K-BILD domains. As lung function values are time-dependent variables with possible improvements, in contrast to age and ILD subtype, it, thus, seems important to improve lung function and prevent its decline in order to maintain HRQL on the possibly highest level.


Subject(s)
Disease Progression , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Quality of Life , Aged , Dyspnea/etiology , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/complications , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Visual Analog Scale
9.
Pediatr Pulmonol ; 55(12): 3579-3586, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946202

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: We aim to assess the anxiety and depressive symptoms related to the COVID-19 pandemic in children with chronic lung disease and their parents and also to evaluate parents' coping strategies. METHODS: Parents of children aged 4-18 years, with chronic lung disease (study group n = 113) and healthy control (n = 108) were enrolled in the study. General Health Questionnaire-12, specific COVID-19 related anxiety questions, The Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced inventory, coronavirus-related psychiatric symptom scale in children-parental form were used to analyze the psychiatric effects of COVID-19. Parents were also asked about how online education affected their family life and children. All data were compared between children/parents in the study and control groups. Risk factors related with anxiety scores of children were also analyzed. RESULTS: Talking about the pandemic, concern about coronavirus transmission, taking precaution to prevent coronavirus transmission, making pressure to protect from COVID-19 were significantly higher in parents within the study group (p < .05). Parents in the study group used more problem-focused coping than parents in the control group (p = .003). Anxiety symptoms score was higher in children of the study group (p = .007). Parents in the study group found online education more useful than parents in the control group. CONCLUSION: Children with chronic lung diseases and their parents have more anxiety due to COVID-19 pandemic and these parents use more mature coping strategies to manage the stress of the pandemic. Longitudinal and larger studies should be done in all aspects of online education in children with chronic lung diseases.


Subject(s)
Anxiety/psychology , Ciliary Motility Disorders/psychology , Coronavirus Infections , Cystic Fibrosis/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Pandemics , Parents/psychology , Pneumonia, Viral , Stress, Psychological/psychology , Adaptation, Psychological , Adolescent , Adult , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Case-Control Studies , Child , Child, Preschool , Ciliary Motility Disorders/physiopathology , Cystic Fibrosis/physiopathology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2
10.
Respiration ; 99(8): 658-666, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32814339

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have reported positive effects of exercise training in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) on physical capacity and quality of life. However, evidence is rare on the effects of specific forms of training and further pathophysiological mechanisms in these patients. OBJECTIVES: In this multicenter study we aimed to explore the clinical effects of whole-body vibration training (WBVT) in patients with ILD on various outcome measures, including proinflammatory cytokines and myostatin. METHODS: We randomly assigned 26 patients with different forms of multidisciplinary confirmed fibrotic ILDs either to the WBVT group (n = 11; 55% male, 61 ± 14 years old, forced vital capacity 83.2 ± 29.3% predicted, 6-min walking distance [6MWD] 478 ± 79 m) performing 3 months of a standardized training (3 times per week), or to a control training group (CTG, n = 15; 60% male, 63 ± 9 years old, FVC 74.6 ± 20.5% predicted, 6MWD 455 ± 85 m) performing sham WBV training. Training in the two groups was performed on a GalileoTM vibration plate (6-20 vs. 5 Hz). The functional assessments before and after the intervention period included pulmonary function, 6MWD test, chair rise test, ultrasonographic measurement of quadriceps muscle thickness (cross-sectional area), quality of life questionnaires, and serum samples. RESULTS: We observed a significant increase in 6MWD (∆Training = 30 m [12-67], p = 0.024) and a decrease of myostatin (∆Training = -465 pg/mL [-713 to -166], p = 0.008) in the WBVT group. In contrast, no significant differences were observed in the CTG. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates that WBVT is able to significantly increase 6MWD and decrease myostatin in patients with fibrotic ILDs. Therefore, WBVT seems to be a beneficial and feasible training modality in ILD patients. Clinical Trial Registry: German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00012930).


Subject(s)
Exercise Therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/rehabilitation , Vibration/therapeutic use , Aged , Exercise Tolerance/physiology , Female , Humans , Interleukin-6/blood , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Myostatin/blood , Quality of Life , Vital Capacity , Walk Test
11.
Respir Res ; 21(1): 91, 2020 Apr 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32316976

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) specific version of St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ-I) and King's Brief Interstitial Lung Disease questionnaire (K-BILD) are validated health-related quality of life (HRQL) instruments, but no or limited data exist on their responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference (MCID). The objectives of this study were to assess responsiveness of SGRQ-I and K-BILD and determine MCID separately for deterioration and improvement in a large, prospective cohort of patients with IPF in a real-world setting. METHODS: Consecutive patients with IPF were recruited. SGRQ-I, K-BILD, SGRQ, Shortness of Breath Questionnaire, pulmonary function tests and 6-min walk test measurements were obtained at baseline and at six and 12 months; at six and 12 months, patients also completed Global Rating of Change Scales. Responsiveness was assessed using correlation coefficients and linear regression. Cox regression was used for mortality analyses. MCID was estimated using receiver operating characteristic curves with separate analyses for improvement and deterioration. RESULTS: A total of 150 IPF patients were included and 124 completed the 12-month follow-up. Based on all HRQL anchors and most physiological anchors, responsiveness analyses supported the evidence pointing towards SGRQ-I and K-BILD as responsive instruments. Multivariate analyses showed an association between SGRQ-I and mortality (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.36, p = 0.03) and a trend was found for K-BILD (HR: 0.82, 95% CI: 0.64 to 1.05, p = 0.12). MCID was estimated for all domains of SGRQ-I and K-BILD. MCID for improvement differed from deterioration for both SGRQ-I Total (3.9 and 4.9) and K-BILD Total (4.7 and 2.7). CONCLUSIONS: SGRQ-I and K-BILD were responsive to change concerning both HRQL and most physiological anchors. MCID was determined separately for improvement and deterioration, resulting in different estimates; especially a smaller estimate for deterioration compared to improvement in K-BILD. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov, no. NCT02818712. Registered 30 June 2016.


Subject(s)
Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnosis , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Minimal Clinically Important Difference , Quality of Life/psychology , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Walk Test/methods , Walk Test/psychology
12.
Clin Respir J ; 14(6): 527-532, 2020 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045097

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The COPD Assessment Test (CAT) is utilised to evaluate the treatment outcome regarding the health status in idiopathic interstitial pneumonia (IIP). However, the ability of the CAT to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is not established. Therefore, we investigated whether CAT scores can be used to evaluate SSc-ILD as they are for IIP. METHODS: A total of 150 patients with IIP or SSc-ILD who were evaluated by the CAT were retrospectively assigned to this study. Clinical data at the visit for the CAT were analysed. RESULTS: The forced vital capacity and distance walked during the 6-minute walk test (6MWD) were significantly correlated with the CAT score for SSc-ILD and IIP, and the CAT scores were similarly distributed in SSc-ILD and IIP. The CAT score of SSc-ILD patients was negatively affected by pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not by corticosteroids, which affected it in IIP patients. CAT scores of patients with either disease receiving home oxygen therapy were poor. In multiple regression analysis, pulmonary arterial hypertension and 6MWD were independent predictors for the CAT score in patients with SSc-ILD, while corticosteroid administration was selected as an independent factor in patients with IIP. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that the CAT can be applied to evaluate the lung-specific quality of life in SSc-ILD similar to IIP regarding the pulmonary function, but it should be noted that pulmonary arterial hypertension in SSc-ILD influences the CAT score.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung/physiopathology , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/physiopathology , Quality of Life/psychology , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/adverse effects , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Case-Control Studies , Female , Health Status , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pulmonary/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/adverse effects , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Retrospective Studies , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/physiopathology , Vital Capacity/physiology , Walk Test/methods
13.
Clin Rheumatol ; 39(2): 483-489, 2020 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31578648

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: The main purpose of this study was to investigate the current situation of primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) in China. The relationships between social demography, disease activity, psychological status, clinical variables, and ILD were analyzed. Besides that, the quality of life (QoL) in pSS with ILD was also analyzed. METHODS: In the cross-sectional study, 101 pSS patients participated in this study. Under the guidance of the researchers, the European League Against Rheumatism Sjögren's Syndrome Disease Activity Index (ESSDAI), EULAR Sjögren's Syndrome Patient-Reported Index (ESSPRI), the Short-Form 36 health survey (SF-36), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI), Summated Xerostomia Inventory (SXI), and other related questionnaires were completed. Independent sample t tests, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-square test, and correlational analysis were used. RESULTS: The data showed that 28 (30.1%) pSS people with ILD. The occurrence and development of ILD were associated with disease duration, fatigue, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), neutrophils, albumin, and use of hormone. The survey also found that the QoL of pSS-ILD was significantly lower than non-ILD, especially the score in the dimension of role physical function. CONCLUSIONS: ILD was very common in pSS. ILD had a significant negative impact on the QoL of patients. Therefore, it is of great significance to strengthen the early intervention and drug treatment of pSS patients to prevent ILD and improve their QoL.Key Points• This cross-sectional study finds that the incidence of ILD in patients with pSS is 30.1%.• The occurrence and development of ILD is associated with disease duration, fatigue, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), neutrophils, albumin, and use of hormone.•The study also finds that the QoL of pSS-ILD is significantly lower than in patients with non-ILD, especially the score in the dimension of role physical function.


Subject(s)
Fatigue/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Quality of Life/psychology , Sjogren's Syndrome/psychology , Adult , Aged , China , Cross-Sectional Studies , Fatigue/diagnosis , Fatigue/etiology , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Severity of Illness Index , Sjogren's Syndrome/complications , Sjogren's Syndrome/diagnosis , Sleep/physiology , Surveys and Questionnaires
14.
BMC Pulm Med ; 19(1): 183, 2019 Oct 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31638951

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Fibrotic interstitial lung disease (FILD) patients are typically dyspneic and exercise-intolerant with consequent impairment of health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Respiratory muscle dysfunction is among the underlying mechanisms of dyspnea and exercise intolerance in FILD but may be difficult to diagnose. Using ultrasound, we compared diaphragmatic mobility and thickening in FILD cases and healthy controls and correlated these findings with dyspnea, exercise tolerance, HRQoL and lung function. METHODS: We measured diaphragmatic mobility and thickness during quiet (QB) and deep breathing (DB) and calculated thickening fraction (TF) in 30 FILD cases and 30 healthy controls. We correlated FILD cases' diaphragmatic findings with dyspnea, exercise tolerance (six-minute walk test), lung function and HRQoL (St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire). RESULTS: Diaphragmatic mobility was similar between groups during QB but was lower in FILD cases during DB when compared to healthy controls (3.99 cm vs 7.02 cm; p <  0.01). FILD cases showed higher diaphragm thickness during QB but TF was lower in FILD when compared to healthy controls (70% vs 188%, p <  0.01). During DB, diaphragmatic mobility and thickness correlated with lung function, exercise tolerance and HRQoL, but inversely correlated with dyspnea. Most FILD cases (70%) presented reduced TF, and these patients had higher dyspnea and exercise desaturation, lower HRQoL and lung function. CONCLUSION: Compared to healthy controls, FILD cases present with lower diaphragmatic mobility and thickening during DB that correlate to increased dyspnea, decreased exercise tolerance, worse HRQoL and worse lung function. FILD cases with reduced diaphragmatic thickening are more dyspneic and exercise-intolerant, have lower HRQoL and lung function.


Subject(s)
Diaphragm , Dyspnea , Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Ultrasonography , Brazil/epidemiology , Diaphragm/diagnostic imaging , Diaphragm/pathology , Diaphragm/physiopathology , Dyspnea/etiology , Dyspnea/physiopathology , Exercise Tolerance , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Respiratory Function Tests/methods , Respiratory Function Tests/statistics & numerical data , Ultrasonography/methods , Ultrasonography/statistics & numerical data , Walk Test/methods
15.
Clin Exp Rheumatol ; 37 Suppl 119(4): 49-56, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31498073

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: PROMIS-29 is a generic health-related quality of life instrument. Our objective was to assess the reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness to change of PROMIS-29 in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). METHODS: Seventy-three participants with SSc-ILD were administered patient reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline and follow-up visits which included PROMIS-29 and other measures of generic health, dyspnea, and cough instruments. We assessed internal consistency reliability using Cronbach's α, an alpha of ≥ 0.70 was considered satisfactory. We assessed the responsiveness to change using linear regression models. RESULTS: Mean age of the participants was 51.9 years and the mean disease duration was 7.9 years after first non-Raynaud's symptom. Of the 73 participants, 56.2% were classified as diffuse SSc and 26% limited SSc. The baseline (mean ± SD) FVC % predicted was 73.9±15.5 with a DLCO % predicted of 57.7±21.1; 95.9% had fibrotic NSIP pattern on HRCT. PROMIS-29 scores were 0.2 to 0.9 SD below the US population. Cronbach's α reliability was acceptable for all domains (ranged from 0.77 to 0.98). All scales showed statistically significant correlations with hypothesised PROMIS-29 domains (p≤0.05 for all comparisons). PROMIS-29 showed none-to-small discriminatory ability in comparison with physiologic measures (FVC and DLCO). There was no significant relationship between the change in FVC versus the change in PROMIS-29 measures over time. CONCLUSIONS: PROMIS-29 has adequate reliability and construct validity for evaluation in SSc-ILD. It has moderate-to-large correlations with other PROs. The PROMIS-29 domains were not found to change over time in this cohort, likely due to stable nature of the observational cohort.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Quality of Life , Scleroderma, Systemic , Surveys and Questionnaires/standards , Dyspnea , Female , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results , Scleroderma, Systemic/psychology
16.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 25(6): 623-628, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31503213

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: There is an increasing recognition of the impact of sleep and sleep disorders on respiratory disease. Recent years have seen a new focus on the relationship between sleep and outcomes in patients interstitial lung disease (ILD). RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies suggest a high prevalence of sleep issues in ILD cohorts, which seem to have a meaningful negative impact on quality of life, disease progression, and survival. SUMMARY: Sleep disordered breathing is common in ILD patients: obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is found in 44-72% of ILD patients, and nocturnal hypoxemia is relatively common even in the absence of OSA. Sleep disorders are associated with worse quality of life in ILD, and may also predict more rapid disease progression and increased mortality. It remains unknown if nocturnal hypoxemia may itself cause progression of ILD. Uncontrolled and retrospective studies have suggested that treating OSA may improve ILD-related outcomes, but prospective studies are lacking in this field.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial , Quality of Life , Sleep Apnea Syndromes , Sleep Wake Disorders , Disease Progression , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/epidemiology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Prevalence , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/physiopathology , Sleep Apnea Syndromes/psychology , Sleep Wake Disorders/epidemiology , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology
17.
Trials ; 20(1): 355, 2019 Jun 13.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31196156

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: People living with chronic heart failure (CHF), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (ILD) suffer impaired quality of life due to burdensome symptoms and depression. The Advancing Symptom Alleviation with Palliative Treatment (ADAPT) trial aims to determine the effect of a multidisciplinary, team-based intervention on quality of life in people with these common diseases. METHODS/DESIGN: The ADAPT trial is a two-site, patient-level randomized clinical trial that examines the effectiveness of the ADAPT intervention compared to usual care on patient-reported quality of life at 6 months in veterans with CHF, COPD or ILD with poor quality of life and increased risk for hospitalization or death. The ADAPT intervention involves a multidisciplinary team-a registered nurse, social worker, palliative care specialist, and primary care provider (with access to a pulmonologist and cardiologist)-who meet weekly to make recommendations and write orders for consideration by participants' individual primary care providers. The nurse and social worker interact with participants over six visits to identify and manage a primary bothersome symptom and complete a structured psychosocial intervention and advance care planning. The primary outcome is change in patient-reported quality of life at 6 months as measured by the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General questionnaire. Secondary outcomes at 6 months include change in symptom distress, depression, anxiety, disease-specific quality of life hospitalizations, and advance care planning communication and documentation. Intervention implementation will be assessed using a mixed-methods approach including a qualitative assessment of participants' and intervention personnel experiences and a quantitative assessment of care delivery, resources, and cost. DISCUSSION: The ADAPT trial studies an innovative intervention designed to improve quality of life for veterans with common, burdensome illnesses by targeting key underlying factors-symptoms and depression-that impair quality of life but persist despite disease-specific therapies. Leveraging the skills of affiliate health providers with physician supervision will extend the reach of palliative care and improve quality of life for those with advanced disease within routine outpatient care. The hybrid effectiveness/implementation design of the ADAPT trial will shorten the time to broader dissemination if effective and create avenues for future research. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02713347 . Registered March 19, 2016.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/therapy , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/therapy , Palliative Care , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/therapy , Quality of Life , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Advance Care Planning , Chronic Disease , Heart Failure/psychology , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Care Team , Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive/psychology
18.
Lung ; 197(4): 415-425, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31154459

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The impact of psychological deficits and pain on physical activity has not been adequately studied in patients with fibrotic interstitial lung disease (ILD). We aimed to determine the association of depression, anxiety, sleep quality, and pain with physical activity in fibrotic ILD. METHODS: Waist ActiGraph activity monitors were worn for seven consecutive days to track step counts and moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) minutes at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Psychological deficits and pain were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and the Brief Pain Inventory. Multivariable linear regression was used to determine if each deficit independently predicted physical activity when adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: A total of 111 patients were recruited, with 91 of these patients completing the 6-month follow-up. Median step count and MVPA minutes were 3853 steps/day (interquartile range 2236-6805) and 87 (17-225) min/week at baseline, respectively, with no significant changes at follow-up. Borderline or abnormal depression and anxiety scores were present in 19% and 22% of patients, respectively. Poor sleep quality and moderate-to-severe pain were present in 61% and 9% of patients. Higher depression scores were associated with fewer baseline and follow-up step counts and lower MVPA minutes at follow-up on unadjusted analysis; higher pain severity scores were associated with fewer baseline step count. Pain severity remained an independent predictor of reduced step count after adjusting for patient's age, smoking status, ILD severity, and weather variables. CONCLUSIONS: Pain severity may be a potentially modifiable determinant of physical activity in patients with fibrotic ILD.


Subject(s)
Exercise Tolerance , Exercise/psychology , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Pain/psychology , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anxiety/psychology , Cost of Illness , Cross-Sectional Studies , Depression/psychology , Female , Health Status , Humans , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Pain/diagnosis , Pain/physiopathology , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Sleep , Sleep Wake Disorders/physiopathology , Sleep Wake Disorders/psychology , Time Factors
20.
Adv Ther ; 36(1): 232-243, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30506309

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: This study will aim to characterise disease behaviour during the peri-diagnostic period in patients with suspected interstitial lung disease (ILD), including idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), using daily home spirometry and accelerometry. Additionally, this study will aim to increase collaboration between secondary and tertiary centres using a digital collaboration platform. METHODS: The STARLINER study (NCT03261037) will enrol approximately 180 symptomatic patients aged 50 years or more with radiological evidence of ILD/IPF from community and tertiary centres in Canada and Europe. Approximately two-thirds of sites will be community centres. Patients will be followed during pre-diagnosis (inclusion to diagnosis; up to a maximum of 12 months) and post-diagnosis (diagnosis to treatment initiation; up to a maximum of 6 months). The study will be facilitated by a digital ecosystem consisting of the devices used for home-based assessments and a digital collaboration platform enabling communication between community and tertiary centres, and between clinicians and patients. PLANNED OUTCOMES: The primary endpoint will be time-adjusted semi-annual change in forced vital capacity (FVC; in millilitres) during the peri-diagnostic period. Physical functional capacity and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) will also be assessed. FVC and physical functional capacity will be measured using daily home spirometry and accelerometry, and at site visits using spirometry and the 6-min walk test. PROs will be assessed prior to, or during, site visits and will always be completed in the same order. CONCLUSIONS: Findings from this study may help to facilitate the early and accurate diagnosis of ILDs by increasing knowledge about disease progression, enabling collaboration between community and tertiary centres and improving communication between clinicians and patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03261037. FUNDING: F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Ltd., Basel, Switzerland. Plain language summary available for this article.


Subject(s)
Lung Diseases, Interstitial/diagnosis , Lung Diseases, Interstitial/psychology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Aged , Canada , Disease Progression , Europe , Female , Humans , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/diagnosis , Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis/psychology , Male , Middle Aged , Switzerland , Vital Capacity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...