ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer is an uncommon event, ranging from 1% to 3%. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to evaluate the impact of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping on the risk of isolated positive para-aortic lymph node metastasis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated a series of 426 patients who underwent SLN mapping with at least one SLN detected from January 2013 to December 2021 (SLN group) compared with a historical series of 209 cases who underwent a systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy between June 2007 and April 2015 (LND group). Isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis recurrences were included in the SLN group analysis. RESULTS: In the SLN group, 168 cases (39.4%) had backup systematic lymphadenectomy, and 56 (13.1%) had positive lymph nodes compared with 34 (16.3%) in LND group (p=0.18). The SLN group had higher rates of minimally invasive surgeries (p<0.001) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p<0.001). Moreover, SLN group had fewer other uterine risk factors, such as high-grade tumors (p<0.001), and deep myometrial invasion (p<0.001). We found that SLN mapped outside the pelvis at pre-sacral, common iliac areas, and para-aortic regions in 2.8% (n=12), 11.5% (n=49), and 1.6% (n=7) of cases, respectively. Overall, 52 (12.2%) patients had positive SLNs, and 3 (5.7%) positive SLNs were found outside the pelvis-one in the pre-sacral region, one in the common iliac area, and one in the para-aortic region. An isolated para-aortic lymph node was found in only 2 (0.5%) cases in the SLN group compared with 7 (3.3%) cases in the LND group (p=0.004). CONCLUSIONS: SLN protocol accurately predicts lymph node status and may decrease the risk of failed identification of isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis compared with systematic lymphadenectomy.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Lymph Nodes , Lymphatic Metastasis , Sentinel Lymph Node , Humans , Female , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Endometrial Neoplasms/surgery , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Aged , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Adult , Aorta/pathologyABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Cervical lymph nodes (LN) represent the most common site of recurrence in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC), frequently requiring repeated interventions that contribute to increase morbidity to a usually indolent disease. Data on active surveillance (AS) of nodal metastasis are limited. Therefore, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate AS in nodal metastasis of DTC patients. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 2023 for studies including DTC patients with metastatic LN who were followed up with AS. The primary outcome was disease progression, according to the study's definition. Additional outcomes were LN enlargement ≥3 mm, occurrence of new cervical metastasis, and conversion from AS to surgical treatment. RESULTS: The search identified 375 studies and seven were included, comprising 486 patients with metastatic nodal DTC. Most were female (69.5%) and had papillary thyroid cancer (99.8%). The mean AS follow-up ranged from 28-86 months. Following each study's definition of progression, the pooled incidence was 28% [95% confidence interval (CI), 20-37%]. The pooled incidence of LN growth ≥ 3 mm was 21% [95% CI, 17-25%] and the emergence of new LN sites was 19% [95% CI, 14-25%]. Combining growth of 3 mm and the emergence of new LN criteria, we found an incidence of 26% [95% CI, 20-33%]. The incidence of neck dissection during AS was 18% [95% CI, 12-26%]. CONCLUSIONS: AS seems to be a suitable strategy for selected DTC patients with small nodal disease, avoiding or postponing surgical reintervention. PROSPERO REGISTRATION: CRD42023438293.
Subject(s)
Lymphatic Metastasis , Thyroid Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Male , Disease Progression , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Metastasis/therapy , Thyroid Neoplasms/pathology , Thyroid Neoplasms/surgery , Watchful WaitingABSTRACT
AIM: The aim of this work was to compare lymph node (LN) yield in patients operated on for right colon cancer (RCC) using a laparoscopic approach between those receiving an intracorporeal (ICA) or extracorporeal anastomosis (ECA). METHOD: This is a retrospective multicentre study involving patients operated on for RCC in nine tertiary referral centres in Latin America during a 2-year period. The main comparative outcome between groups was the number of LNs harvested between groups. RESULTS: The study included 416 patients, 261 (62.7%) in the ECA group and 155 (37.3%) in the ICA group. Patients in the ECA group were elderly (66 vs. 61 years, p < 0.001). Patients receiving an ICA achieved a significantly higher LN yield than those receiving an ECA (24 vs. 18, p < 0.001). This group also had a lower percentage of patients achieving a substandard LN yield (<12 LNs) (10% vs. 24.8%, p = 0.001) and more patients achieving a high number of harvested LNs (>32 LNs) (15.5% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.039). In the multivariate analysis, ICA was independently related to the primary outcome (LN yield) (OR 3.28, p = 0.027, 95% CI 1.14-9.38). CONCLUSION: In this retrospective study, patients operated on for RCC who received an ICA achieved a higher LN yield. Further studies are needed to reconfirm these findings, and also to find an explanation for these results.
Subject(s)
Anastomosis, Surgical , Colonic Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Male , Female , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Aged , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Node Excision/statistics & numerical data , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/statistics & numerical data , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Latin America , Colectomy/methods , Lymphatic MetastasisABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is the technique recommended for the axillary staging of patients with breast cancer in the initial stages without clinical axillary involvement. Three techniques are widely used globally to detect sentinel lymph nodes: patent blue, the radiopharmaceutical technetium 99 with gamma probe, and the combination of these two. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the sentinel lymph node detection rate with an innovative technique: indocyanine green (ICG) associated with fluorescence in breast cancer patients, and compare it with patent blue and a combination of patent blue and indocyanine green. METHODS: 99 patients were sequentially (not randomly) allocated into 3 arms with 33 patients submitted to sentinel lymph node techniques. One arm underwent patent blue dying, the other indocyanine green, and the third received a combination of both. The detection rates between arms were compared. RESULTS: The detection rate in identifying the sentinel lymph node was 78.8% with patent blue, 93.9% with indocyanine green, and 100% with the combination. Indocyanine green identified two sentinel nodes in 48.5% of patients; the other groups more commonly had only one node identified. The mean time to sentinel lymph node identification was 20.6 ± 10.7 SD (standard deviation) minutes among patients submitted to the patent blue dye, 8.6 ± 6.6 minutes in the indocyanine green arm, and 10 ± 8.9 minutes in the combined group (P<0.001; Student's test). The mean surgery time was 69.4 ± 16.9; 55.1 ± 13.9; and 69.4 ± 19.3 minutes respectively (P<0.001; Student's test). CONCLUSIONS: The sentinel lymph node detection rate by fluorescence using indocyanine green was 93.9%, considered adequate. The rates using patent blue, indocyanine green, and patent blue plus indocyanine green (combined) were significantly different, and the indocyanine green alone is also acceptable, since it has a good performance in sentinel lymph node identification and it can avoid tattooing, with a 100% sentinel lymph node detection rate when combined with patent blue.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Lymphadenopathy , Sentinel Lymph Node , Humans , Female , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Indocyanine Green , Coloring Agents , Sentinel Lymph Node/diagnostic imaging , Sentinel Lymph Node/surgery , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Lymphadenopathy/pathology , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prevalence of post-operative complications and quality of life (QoL) related to sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy vs systematic lymphadenectomy in endometrial cancer. METHODS: A prospective cohort included women with early-stage endometrial carcinoma who underwent lymph node staging, grouped as follows: SLN group (sentinel lymph node only) and SLN+LND group (sentinel lymph node biopsy with addition of systematic lymphadenectomy). The patients had at least 12 months of follow-up, and QoL was assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cervical Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30) and EORTC-QLQ-Cx24. Lymphedema was also assessed by clinical evaluation and perimetry. RESULTS: 152 patients were included: 113 (74.3%) in the SLN group and 39 (25.7%) in the SLN+LND group. Intra-operative surgical complications occurred in 2 (1.3%) cases, and all belonged to SLN+LND group. Patients undergoing SLN+LND had higher overall complication rates than those undergoing SLN alone (33.3% vs 14.2%; p=0.011), even after adjusting for confound factors (OR=3.45, 95% CI 1.40 to 8.47; p=0.007). The SLN+LND group had longer surgical time (p=0.001) and need for admission to the intensive care unit (p=0.001). Moreover, the incidence of lymphocele was found in eight cases in the SLN+LND group (0 vs 20.5%; p<0.001). There were no differences in lymphedema rate after clinical evaluation and perimetry. However, the lymphedema score was highest when lymphedema was reported by clinical examination at 6 months (30.1 vs 7.8; p<0.001) and at 12 months (36.3 vs 6.0; p<0.001). Regarding the overall assessment of QoL, there was no difference between groups at 12 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher overall rate of complications for the group undergoing systematic lymphadenectomy, as well as higher rates of lymphocele and lymphedema according to the symptom score. No difference was found in overall QoL between SLN and SLN+LND groups.
Subject(s)
Endometrial Neoplasms , Lymphedema , Lymphocele , Humans , Female , Quality of Life , Prospective Studies , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/adverse effects , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Node Excision/adverse effects , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Prevalence , Lymphedema/epidemiology , Lymphedema/etiology , Lymphedema/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: Pre-surgical lymph node marking is an established medical procedure of vital importance in the treatment of cancer patients. Materials: A 60-year-old man with a history of prostatic adenocarcinoma in a plan for resection of hypogastric adenopathy. Image guided pre-surgical marking was indicated. Results: Preoperative marking was performed with local anesthesia under computed tomography with transosseous access and hydrodissection. Conclusion: We present a technique that has been little studied and rarely reported in the international literature for the surgical identification of deep pelvic adenopathy.
Introducción: La marcación pre quirúrgica de ganglios es un procedimiento médico establecido y de vital importancia en el tratamiento de pacientes oncológicos. Materiales: Hombre de 60 años con antecedentes de adenocarcinoma prostático en plan de resección de adenopatía hipogástrica. Se indicó marcación prequirúrgica mediante guía imagenológica. Resultados: Se realizó marcación prequirúrgica con anestesia local bajo tomografía computada con acceso transóseo e hidrodisección. Conclusiones: presentamos una técnica poco estudiada y escasamente reportada en la bibliografía internacional para la identificación quirúrgica de una adenopatía pélvica profunda.
Subject(s)
Lymphadenopathy , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Lymphadenopathy/pathologyABSTRACT
Surgery is not used as a criterion for staging prostate cancer, although there is evidence that the number of analyzed and affected lymph nodes have prognosis value. The aim of this study was to determine whether there are significant differences in staging criteria in patients who underwent prostatectomy compared to those who did not, and whether the number of affected and analyzed lymph nodes (LN) plays a prognostic role. In this retrospective study, a test cohort consisting of 404,210 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer, between 2004 and 2010, was obtained from the 17 registries (Nov 2021 submission); a validation consisting of 147,719 newly diagnosed men with prostate cancer between 2004 and 2019 was obtained from the 8 registries (Nov 2021 submission). Prostate cancer-specific survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves, survival tables and Cox regression; overall survival was analyzed only to compare Harrell's C-index between different staging criteria. In initial analyses, it was observed that the prognostic value of lymph node metastasis changes according to the type of staging (clinical or pathological), which is linked to the surgical approach (prostatectomy). Compared with T4/N0/M0 patients, which are also classified as stage IVA, N1/M0 patients had a shorter [adjusted HR: 1.767 (1429-2184), p < 0.0005] and a longer [adjusted HR: 0.832 (0.740-0.935), p = 0.002] specific survival when submitted to prostatectomy or not, respectively. Analyzing separately the patients who were submitted to prostatectomy and those who were not, it was possible to obtain new LN metastasis classifications (N1: 1 + LN; N2: 2 + LNs; N3: > 2 + LNs). This new (pathological) classification of N allowed the reclassification of patients based on T and Gleason grade groups, mainly those with T3 and T4 disease. In the validation group, this new staging criterion was proven to be superior [specific survival C-index: 0.908 (0.906-0.911); overall survival C-index: 0.788 (0.786-0.791)] compared to that currently used by the AJCC [8th edition; specific survival C-index: 0.892 (0.889-0.895); overall survival C-index: 0.744 (0.741-0.747)]. In addition, an adequate number of dissected lymph nodes results in a 39% reduction in death risk [adjusted HR: 0.610 (0.498-0.747), p < 0.0005]. As main conclusion, the surgery has a major impact on prostate cancer staging, mainly modifying the effect of N on survival, and enabling the stratification of pathological N according to the number of affected LN. Such a factor, when considered as staging criteria, improves the prognosis classification.
Subject(s)
Lymph Nodes , Prostatic Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Neoplasm Staging , Retrospective Studies , Prognosis , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Prostatic Neoplasms/epidemiology , Prostatic Neoplasms/surgery , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathologyABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis to investigate the diagnostic safety and accuracy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy (US-CNB) Axillary Lymph Nodes (ALNs) region in patients with Breast Cancer (BC). METHODS: The authors searched the electronic databases PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Web of Science for clinical trials about US-CNB for the detection of ALNs in breast cancer patients. The authors extracted and pooled raw data from the included studies and performed statistical analyses using Meta-DiSc 1.4 and Review Manager 5.3 software. A random effects model was used to calculate the data. At the same time, data from the Ultrasound-guided Fine-Needle Aspiration (US-FNA) were introduced for comparison with the US-CNB. In addition, the subgroup was performed to explore the causes of heterogeneity. (PROSPERO ID: CRD42022369491). RESULTS: In total, 18 articles with 2521 patients were assessed as meeting the study criteria. The overall sensitivity was 0.90 (95% CI [Confidence Interval], 0.87â0.91; p = 0.00), the overall specificity was 0.99 (95% CI 0.98â1.00; p = 0.62), the overall area under the curve (AUC) was 0.98. Next, in the comparison of US-CNB and US-FNA, US-CNB is better than US-FNA in the diagnosis of ALNs metastases. The sensitivity was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84â0.91; p = 0.12) vs. 0.73 (95% CI 0.69â0.76; p = 0.91), the specificity was 1.00 (95% CI 0.99â1.00; p = 1.00) vs. 0.99 (95% CI 0.67â0.74; p = 0.92), and the AUC was 0.99 vs. 0.98. Subgroup analysis showed that heterogeneity may be related to preoperative Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy (NAC) treatment, region, size of tumor diameter, and the number of punctures. CONCLUSION: US-CNB has a satisfactory diagnostic performance with good specificity and sensitivity in the preoperative diagnosis of ALNs in BC patients.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy, Large-Core Needle , Axilla/pathology , Sensitivity and Specificity , Lymph Nodes/diagnostic imaging , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Ultrasonography, Interventional , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: The study aimed to assess the frequency of Langer's arch in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer. METHODS: From January-2015 to March-2020, in a general hospital in México City, female patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer were studied. The analysis involved: demographic and anthropometric data, type of surgical treatment, histopathologic diagnosis, number of lymph nodes harvested, and frequency of Langer's arch finding. RESULTS: The sample studied was 123 axillary dissections. The mean age of the patients was 59 ± 10.5-years. Modified radical mastectomy was done in 117 cases (95.1%). Ductal carcinoma occurred in 96 cases (78%). The mean number of lymph nodes harvested was 24 ± 6.5. Langer's arch finding occurred in 33 cases (26.8%). CONCLUSION: Langer's arch is frequent in our patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Axilla , Mastectomy , Lymph Node Excision , Lymph Nodes/surgeryABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Tumor-to-skin distance is known to have an effect on axillary lymph node metastasis but has no clinical use with nomograms. This study aimed to investigate the effect of tumor-to-skin distance on axillary lymph node metastasis alone and in combination with nomogram for clinical use. METHODS: A total of 145 patients who underwent surgery for breast cancer (T1-T2 stage) and whose axillary lymph nodes were evaluated (axillary dissection or sentinel lymph node biopsy) between January 2010 and December 2020 were included in the study. Tumor-to-skin distance and other pathological data of the patients were evaluated. RESULTS: Of the 145 patients, 83 (57.2%) had metastatic lymph nodes in the axilla. Tumor-to-skin distance was different in terms of lymph node metastasis (p=0.045). In the receiver operating characteristic curve for tumor-to-skin distance, area under curve was 0.597 (95%CI 0.513-0.678, p=0.046), area under curve of the nomogram was 0.740 (95%CI 0.660-0.809), p<0.001) and nomogram+tumor-to-skin distance was 0.753 (95%CI 0.674-0.820), p<0.001). No statistical difference was found for axillary lymph node metastasis between the nomogram+tumor-to-skin distance and the nomogram alone (p=0.433). CONCLUSION: Although tumor-to-skin distance demonstrated a significant difference in axillary lymph node metastasis, it had a poor association with an area under curve value of 0.597 and did not produce a significant improvement in predicting lymph node metastasis when combined with the nomogram. The tumor-to-skin distance may be unlikely to enter clinical practice.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Axilla/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Node Excision , ROC Curve , Retrospective StudiesSubject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms , Laparoscopy , Humans , Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Lymph Node Excision , Colectomy , Lymph Nodes/surgeryABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Given the high rate of complete nodal response, the role of axillary lymph node dissection on staging the axilla has been questioned. This survey, addressed to breast cancer surgeons in Spain, has the objective of assessing current clinical trends on axillary staging of cN + patients treated with NAC. METHODS: An online survey was conducted among breast surgeons from the Spanish Society of Surgery (AEC), Spanish Surgical Oncology Society (SEOQ), Spanish Breast Cancer Surgeons Society (AECIMA) and Spanish Gynecology and Obstetrics Society (SEGO). It was structured in 5 sections: general information and clinical practice, knowledge of clinical trials, diagnosis work-up and nodal marking, axillary staging, and axillary treatment. RESULTS: 150 breast cancer surgeons completed the full survey (96.7%). 81.8% of respondents performed SLNB or targeted axillary dissection in cN1 patients treated with NAC. Radiological axillary response was the preferred parameter guiding the surgical strategy. The excision of the clipped node (92.0%), use of dual tracer (73.2%), and axillary US (65.9%) after treatment were the most important variables considered by respondents, to increase the accuracy of SLNB in cN + patients. CONCLUSION: This survey confirms a trend toward a less invasive approach for axillary staging in cN + patients treated with NAC among breast cancer surgeons in Spain. While there is widespread agreement in less invasive approaches to axillary staging, there is, however, a lack of consensus around treatment strategy. Further, it shows a wide heterogeneity in their clinical practice. This study highlights the need for clear evidence concerning less invasive staging procedures and their oncological safety, to ensure consistent recommendations in surgical practice.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Surgeons , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/drug therapy , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods , Spain , Axilla , Neoplasm Staging , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node dissection (SLND) is an alternative to axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) for breast cancer surgery. But the criteria of SLND only for patients with limited disease in the sentinel node is disputed. METHODS: From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, 2000-2015, we identified 97,296 early breast cancer females with 1-3 axillary lymph nodes macro-metastasis. Of them, 1-5 (axillary conservation group), 6-9, and ≥ 10 (ALND group) axillary lymph nodes were dissected in 28,639, 16,838, and 51,819 patients, respectively. According to the criteria of the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, two historical cohort studies of patients who underwent lumpectomy or mastectomy were conducted and the survival outcomes between ALND and axillary conservation were compared. RESULTS: Overall, dissection of 6-9 regional lymph nodes resulted in the worst prognosis. After propensity-matched analysis, it was found that patients in the axillary conservation group had worse survival than the ALND group in overall survival. No significant difference in prognosis between the group undergoing lumpectomy was found both in OS and BCSS. Subgroup analysis revealed that Grade 3, T2, two lymph nodes positive, or Her2 positive were the main causes of worse survival in the axillary conservation group. CONCLUSION: Not all patients with N1 early breast cancer suit axillary conservation. Axillary conservation was sufficient in patients who were treated with lumpectomy. ALND cannot be omitted in patients who were ineligible for the Z0011 and undergoing mastectomy with the following characteristics: T2, Grade 3, two positive lymph nodes, and Her2 positive, which may be better complemented to the Z0011 trial. Hence, under different surgical methods, the clinical precision treatment of ALND or axillary preservation is essential.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy/methods , Mastectomy , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Follow-Up Studies , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , AxillaABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Multiple surgical alternatives are available to treat breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) providing a variable spectrum of outcomes. This study aimed to present the breast cancer-related lymphedema multidisciplinary approach (B-LYMA) to systematically treat BCRL. METHODS: Seventy-eight patients presenting with BCRL between 2017 and 2021 were included. The average age and BMI were 49.4 ± 7.8 years and 28.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2 , respectively. Forty patients had lymphedema ISL stage II (51.3%) and 38 had stage III (48.7%). The mean follow-up was 26.4 months. Treatment was selected according to the B-LYMA algorithm, which aims to combine physiologic and excisional procedures according to the preoperative evaluation of patients. All patients had pre- and postoperative complex decongestive therapy (CDT). RESULTS: Stage II patients were treated with lymphaticovenous anastomosis (LVA) (n = 18), vascularized lymph node transfer (VLNT) (n = 12), and combined DIEP flap and VLNT (n = 10). Stage III patients underwent combined suction-assisted lipectomy (SAL) and LVA (n = 36) or combined SAL and VLNT (n = 2). Circumferential reduction rates (CRR) were comparable between patients treated with LVA (56.5 ± 8.4%), VLNT (54.4 ± 10.2%), and combined VLNT-DIEP flap (56.5 ± 3.9%) (p > .05). In comparison to LVA, VLNT, and combined VLNT-DIEP flap, combined SAL-LVA exhibited higher CRRs (85 ± 10.5%, p < .001). The CRR for combined SAL-VLNT was 75 ± 8.5%. One VLNT failed and minor complications occurred in the combined DIEP-VLNT group. CONCLUSION: The B-LYMA protocol directs the treatment of BCRL according to the lymphatic system's condition. In advanced stages where a single physiologic procedure is not sufficient, additional excisional surgery is implemented. Preoperative and postoperative CDT is mandatory to improve the outcomes.
Subject(s)
Breast Cancer Lymphedema , Breast Neoplasms , Lymphatic Vessels , Female , Humans , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/diagnosis , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/etiology , Breast Cancer Lymphedema/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/complications , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymphatic Vessels/surgery , Lymphatic Vessels/pathology , Adult , Middle AgedABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relation between mismatch repair (MMR) status and the risk of lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer, and whether this additional data can be incorporated to current SLN (sentinel lymph node) algorithm. METHODS: We included a series of 332 women that underwent SLN mapping ± systematic lymphadenectomy from January 2013 to December 2021. Protein expressions of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, PMS2 were examined by immuno-histochemistry and considered MMRd (deficient) when at least one protein was not expressed. RESULTS: MMRd was noted in 20.8% of cases and correlated to grade 3 (p = 0.018) and presence of lymphovascular space invasion (p = 0.032). Moreover, MMRd was an independent risk factor for lymph node metastasis (OR 2.76, 95% CI 1.36-5.62). Notably, 21.7% (15/69) cases with MMRd had lymph node metastasis compared to 9.5% (25/263) of cases with MMRp (proficient) (p = 0.005). The overall and bilateral SLN detection rates were 91.9% and 75.9%, respectively. Of the 80 (24%) cases of non-bilateral SLN detection, 66.2% had low-grade tumors (G1/G2) and myometrial invasion <50%. Considering MMR status an independent prognostic factor for lymph node metastasis, a systematic lymphadenectomy (side specific or bilateral) would forgo in 53.7% (43/80) of cases with non-bilateral detection, representing 13% (43/332) of all endometroid tumors. CONCLUSION: MMR status was independently related to lymph node metastasis in endometrioid EC. Moreover, MMR status may help to select patients that can forgo systematic lymphadenectomy in case of undetected SLN.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Endometrioid , Endometrial Neoplasms , Sentinel Lymph Node , Humans , Female , Sentinel Lymph Node/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , DNA Mismatch Repair , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/surgery , Carcinoma, Endometrioid/pathology , Lymph Node Excision , Endometrial Neoplasms/pathology , Algorithms , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoplasm StagingABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Despite the advances in the classification of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) based on its extension by the TNM system, there is still a need for methods to better classify the patients to predict prognosis and indicate adjuvant therapy. OBJECTIVES: To analyze the influence of the number of positive lymph nodes (PN), lymph node ratio (LNR), and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in survival of patients with OSCC. METHODS: Clinicopathologic data from patients with OSCC who were treated with curative purposes by surgery and neck dissection (ND) with or without subsequent adjuvant therapies from 1991 to 2015 was retrospectively assessed. The impact of the PN, LNR, LODDS, and other variables on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were included in this study. In the univariate analysis the PN had a significant impact on OS (p = 0.001) and DFS (p = 0.020), and the LNR had a significant impact on the OS (p = 0.042). In the multivariate analysis with other relevant clinicopathologic variables, the PN was the only significantly independent factor influencing in the OS (p = 0.017) but not in DFS (p = 0.096). CONCLUSIONS: The PN is an independent prognostic indicator for OS and DFS in patients with OSCC and has the potential to aggregate the current AJCC classification. The LNR has potential to be an important prognostic indicator, but the methods for this classification require lapidation. The LODDS did not demonstrate prognostic potential.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell , Head and Neck Neoplasms , Mouth Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Neoplasm Staging , Lymphatic Metastasis/diagnosis , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Mouth Neoplasms/diagnosis , Mouth Neoplasms/surgeryABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To conduct a systematic review to analyse the performance of the sentinel lymph-node biopsy (SLNB) in women with node-positive breast cancer at diagnosis and node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy, compared to axillary lymph-node dissection. METHODS: The more relevant databases were searched. Main outcomes were false-negative rate (FNR), sentinel lymph-node identification rate (SLNIR), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy. We conducted meta-analyses when appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included. The pooled FNR was 0.14 (95% CI 0.11-0.17), the pooled SLNIR was 0.89 (95% CI 0.86-0.92), NPV was 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87), and summary accuracy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.90-0.94). SLNB performed better when more than one node was removed and double mapping was used. CONCLUSIONS: SLNB can be performed in women with a node-negative tumour after neoadjuvant therapy. It has a better performance when used with previous marking of the affected node and with double tracer.
Subject(s)
Breast Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Breast Neoplasms/surgery , Breast Neoplasms/diagnosis , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Axilla , Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy , Lymph Node ExcisionABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Remnant gastric cancer (RGC) is defined as a carcinoma that develops in the gastric remnant from 5 years after gastrectomy, regardless of the primary gastric disease. The pattern of lymph node dissemination in these patients is not well understood. The present study aims to understand the lymph node distribution of patients with RGC in a single center. METHODS: In a total of 1380 patients with gastric cancer, between 1998 and 2020, 43 patients operated on for RGC were analyzed. The pattern of lymph node dissemination was evaluated based on the number of dissected lymph node stations, the number of positive lymph node stations, the positivity index at each analyzed station, the number of dissected lymph nodes per patient, and the positivity index per lymph node station. RESULTS: A mean of 13.0 ± 8.1 lymph nodes were dissected. The incidence of lymph node involvement by dissected station was higher at Stations 19, 11p, 3, 4sb and 7 (50, 40, 37.5, 36 and 31.7%, respectively). Among the positive dissected stations, Station 3 with 52.2%, 4sb with 39.1% and 4sa with 34.8% were the most affected. CONCLUSION: There was no predilection for lymph node involvement when comparing the lesser and greater gastric curvature. The dissection of Stations 3, 4sb and 4sa is fundamental in surgical treatment with curative purposes. The totalization of gastrectomy with lymphadenectomy of the perigastric and supra-pancreatic stations should be the surgery of choice.
Subject(s)
Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Lymph Node Excision , Gastrectomy , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to analyze the prevalence of lymph node metastasis in early-stage ovarian carcinoma after systematic lymph node dissection and its impact on indication of adjuvant chemotherapy. STUDY DESIGN: We evaluated a series of 765 patients diagnosed with ovarian carcinoma who underwent surgical treatment from February 2007 to December 2019. Patients with peritoneal disease and incomplete surgical staging were excluded. All cases underwent systematic pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy up to the renal vessels. RESULTS: A total of 142 cases were analyzed. Median pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissected were 30 (range, 6-81) and 21 (range, 3-86), respectively. Twelve (8.4%) patients had metastatic lymph nodes - high-grade serous, 10.4% (5/48); clear cell, 17.2% (5/29) and endometrioid, 5.7% (2/35). Any other histology (low grade serous, mucinous, carcinosarcoma or mixed) had lymph node metastasis. Notably, 50% of patients with positive lymph nodes had preoperative suspicious lymph nodes in imaging. The median hospital stay length was 6 days (range, 2-33) and 4.2% cases had grade ≥ 3 complications. A total of 110 (77.6%) patients underwent adjuvant chemotherapy and all cases had indication of adjuvant chemotherapy after histological type, despite the lymph node status. After a median follow-up of 52.5 months, we noted 24 (16.9%) recurrences. The 5-year recurrence-free survival and overall survival were 86.4% and 98.1%, respectively. High grade histology was the only variable that negatively impacted disease-free survival in univariate analysis [HR 4.70 (95%CI: 1.09-20); p = 0.037]. CONCLUSIONS: We found a positive lymph node rate of less than 10% after lymphadenectomy in presumed early-stage ovarian carcinoma. Lymph node status was not determinant for adjuvant chemotherapy.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma , Ovarian Neoplasms , Female , Humans , Lymphatic Metastasis/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial/pathology , Lymph Nodes/surgery , Lymph Nodes/pathology , Ovarian Neoplasms/pathology , Lymph Node Excision/methods , Carcinoma/surgery , Carcinoma/pathology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: To analyze the influence of the lymph node ratio (LNR) in survival of patients with OSCC METHODS: Clinicopathologic data from patients with OSCC who were treated with curative surgery and neck dissection (ND) with or without adjuvant therapies from 1991 to 2015 was retrospectively assessed. The impact of LNR and other variables on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was analyzed in univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: One hundred nineteen patients were included. In the univariate analysis the LNR had a significant impact on OS (p = 0.01) and DFS (p = 0.01). In the multivariate analysis, the LNR was the only significantly independent factor influencing in the OS (p = 0.03). The adjuvant therapies did not influence on the OS (p = 0.42) and DFS (p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS: The LNR is an independent prognostic factor in patients with OSCC. The LNR alone is not recommended to indicate the performance of adjuvant therapies.