Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 323
Filter
1.
Blood Press ; 33(1): 2383234, 2024 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39056371

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In the in-clinic blood pressure (BP) recording setting, a sizable number of individuals with normal BP and approximately 30% of patients with chronic renal disease (CKD) exhibit elevated outpatient BP records. These individuals are known as masked hypertension (MHTN), and when they are on antihypertensive medications, but their BP is not controlled, they are called masked uncontrolled hypertension (MUHTN). The masked phenomenon (MP) (MHTN and MUHTN) increases susceptibility to end-organ damage (a two-fold greater risk for cardiovascular events and kidney dysfunction). The potential extension of the observed benefits of MP therapy, including a reduction in end-organ damage, remains questionable. AIM AND METHODS: This review aims to study the diagnostic methodology, epidemiology, pathophysiology, and significance of MP management in end-organs, especially the kidneys, cardiovascular system, and outcomes. To achieve the purposes of this non-systematic comprehensive review, PubMed, Google, and Google Scholar were searched using keywords, texts, and phrases such as masked phenomenon, CKD and HTN, HTN types, HTN definition, CKD progression, masked HTN, MHTN, masked uncontrolled HTN, CKD onset, and cardiovascular system and MHTN. We restricted the search process to the last ten years to search for the latest updates. CONCLUSION: MHTN is a variant of HTN that can be missed if medical professionals are unaware of it. Early detection by ambulatory or home BP recording in susceptible individuals reduces end-organ damage and progresses to sustained HTN. Adherence to the available recommendations when dealing with masked phenomena is justifiable; however, further studies and recommendation updates are required.


Blood pressure tells us how much force the heart exerts on the blood vessels as it pumps blood. Normal blood pressure should be 120/80 mmHg, which generally decreases when a person is sleeping or sitting. High blood pressure or hypertension occurs when the blood pressure is too high. Hidden or masked hypertension (MH) is a type of high blood pressure. Masked hypertension was described as having high blood pressure readings even though the doctor's office or in-clinic showed normal blood pressure readings.This review aimed to teach people about various kinds of high blood pressure, focusing on hidden (masked) hypertension and how to recognise it, as well as its consequences, treatment, and new information.


Subject(s)
Cardiovascular Diseases , Masked Hypertension , Humans , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/physiopathology , Cardiovascular Diseases/etiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Blood Pressure , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use
2.
J Hum Hypertens ; 38(8): 595-602, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38987381

ABSTRACT

The values used to define white-coat and masked blood pressure (BP) effects are usually arbitrary. This study aimed at investigating the accuracy of various cutoffs based on the differences (ΔBP) between office BP (OBP) and 24h-ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to identify white-coat (WCH) and masked (MH) hypertension, which are phenotypes coupled with adverse prognosis. This cross-sectional study included 11,350 [Derivation cohort; 45% men, mean age = 55.1 ± 14.1 years, OBP = 132.1 ± 17.6/83.9 ± 12.5 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 121.6 ± 11.4/76.1 ± 9.6 mmHg, 25% using antihypertensive medications (AH)] and 7220 (Validation cohort; 46% men, mean age = 58.6 ± 15.1 years, OBP = 136.8 ± 18.7/87.6 ± 13.0 mmHg, 24 h-ABPM = 125.5 ± 12.6/77.7 ± 10.3 mmHg; 32% using AH) unique individuals who underwent 24 h-ABPM. We compared the sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values and area under the curve (AUC) of diverse ΔBP cutoffs to detect WCH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = 28/17, 20/15, 20/10, 16/11, 15/9, 14/9 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = 13 and 10 mmHg) and MH (ΔsystolicBP/ΔdiastolicBP = -14/-9, -5/-2, -3/-1, -1/-1, 0/0, 2/2 mmHg and ΔsystolicBP = -5 and -3mmHg). The 20/15 mmHg cutoff showed the best AUC (0.804, 95%CI = 0.794-0.814) to detect WCH, while the 2/2 mmHg cutoff showed the highest AUC (0.741, 95%CI = 0.728-0.754) to detect MH in the Derivation cohort. Both cutoffs also had the best accuracy to detect WCH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.754-0.780) and MH (0.767, 95%CI = 0.750-0.784) in the Validation cohort. In secondary analyses, these cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect individuals with higher and lower office-than-ABPM grades in both cohorts. In conclusion, the 20/15 and 2/2 mmHg ΔBP cutoffs had the best accuracy to detect hypertensive patients with WCH and MH, respectively, and can serve as indicators of marked white-coat and masked BP effects derived from 24 h-ABPM.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Blood Pressure , Masked Hypertension , White Coat Hypertension , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Female , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/physiopathology , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Aged , Adult , Predictive Value of Tests , Reproducibility of Results
3.
Eur Heart J ; 45(31): 2851-2861, 2024 Aug 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847237

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Guidelines suggest similar blood pressure (BP) targets in patients with and without diabetes and recommend ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) to diagnose and classify hypertension. It was explored whether different levels of ambulatory and office BP and different hypertension phenotypes associate with differences of risk in diabetes and no diabetes. METHODS: This analysis assessed outcome data from the Spanish ABPM Registry in 59 124 patients with complete available data. The associations between office, mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP with the risk in patients with or without diabetes were explored. The effects of diabetes on mortality in different hypertension phenotypes, i.e. sustained hypertension, white-coat hypertension, and masked hypertension, compared with normotension were studied. Analyses were done with Cox regression analyses and adjusted for demographic and clinical confounders. RESULTS: A total of 59 124 patients were recruited from 223 primary care centres in Spain. The majority had an office systolic BP >140 mmHg (36 700 patients), and 23 128 (40.6%) patients were untreated. Diabetes was diagnosed in 11 391 patients (19.2%). Concomitant cardiovascular (CV) disease was present in 2521 patients (23.1%) with diabetes and 4616 (10.0%) without diabetes. Twenty-four-hour mean, daytime, and nighttime ambulatory BP were associated with increased risk in diabetes and no diabetes, while in office BP, there was no clear association with no differences with and without diabetes. While the relative association of BP to CV death risk was similar in diabetes compared with no diabetes (mean interaction P = .80, daytime interaction P = .97, and nighttime interaction P = .32), increased event rates occurred in diabetes for all ABPM parameters for CV death and all-cause death. White-coat hypertension was not associated with risk for CV death (hazard ratio 0.86; 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.03) and slightly reduced risk for all-cause death in no diabetes (hazard ratio 0.89; confidence interval 0.81-0.98) but without significant interaction between diabetes and no diabetes. Sustained hypertension and masked hypertension in diabetes and no diabetes were associated with even higher risk. There were no significant interactions in hypertensive phenotypes between diabetes and no diabetes and CV death risk (interaction P = .26), while some interaction was present for all-cause death (interaction P = .043) and non-CV death (interaction P = .053). CONCLUSIONS: Diabetes increased the risk for all-cause death, CV, and non-CV death at every level of office and ambulatory BP. Masked and sustained hypertension confer to the highest risk, while white-coat hypertension appears grossly neutral without interaction of relative risk between diabetes and no diabetes. These results support recommendations of international guidelines for strict BP control and using ABPM for classification and assessment of risk and control of hypertension, particularly in patients with diabetes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not applicable.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension , Humans , Male , Female , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Middle Aged , Hypertension/mortality , Hypertension/complications , Aged , Spain/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/mortality , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus/physiopathology , White Coat Hypertension/mortality , White Coat Hypertension/complications , Masked Hypertension/mortality , Masked Hypertension/complications , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure/physiology
5.
J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) ; 26(6): 615-623, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751130

ABSTRACT

There is a controversial debate regarding whether unattended blood pressure (BP) measurement should be regarded as the new gold standard of office BP measurement. Unattended BP measurement eliminates the white-coat effect and reduces external influences on the patient. On the other hand, it might underestimate real-life BP. The present study compares the prevalence of masked hypertension using attended versus unattended office BP measurements. We performed a cross-sectional study on 213 patients in a general practitioner's outpatient clinic and compared attended and unattended office BP with 24h-ambulatory BP monitoring (24h-ABPM). Masked hypertension was defined as pressure ≥135/85 mmHg in daytime ABPM with office systolic BP < 140/90 mmHg. Median attended and unattended office BPs were 140/86 and 134/80 mmHg with a median 24h-BP of 129/79 mmHg and daytime ABP of 133/82 mmHg. The number of patients with masked hypertension was 45/213 (21.2%) using unattended and 23/213 (10.8%) using attended office BP measurements (p < .0001). Bland-Altman analysis revealed a 7.4 mmHg systolic and 6.2 mmHg diastolic bias between the attended versus unattended office BP, and two systolic and -1.7 mmHg diastolic biases between the unattended office BP and daytime ambulatory BP. In linear regression analysis, an unattended office BP of 134 mmHg corresponded to 140 mmHg in attended BP measurement. Using a cut-off of 135/85 mmHg instead of 140/90 mmHg in unattended office BP measurement, the rate of masked hypertension was 26/213 (12.2%). Thus, unattended office BP measurement results in a substantial increase in the prevalence of masked hypertension using the traditional definition of hypertension. The present findings suggest that it might be reasonable to use a definition of 135/85 mmHg.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Determination , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Masked Hypertension , Humans , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prevalence , Middle Aged , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Blood Pressure Determination/methods , Blood Pressure/physiology , Aged , Adult , Office Visits/statistics & numerical data , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/epidemiology , White Coat Hypertension/physiopathology
6.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 39(9): 2725-2732, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38761222

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is recommended for diagnosis and management of hypertension. We aimed to identify characteristics associated with physician action after receipt of abnormal findings. METHODS: This was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of patients 5-22 years old who underwent 24-h ABPM between 2003-2022, met criteria for masked or ambulatory hypertension, and had a pediatric nephrology clinic visit within 2 weeks of ABPM. "Action" was defined as medication change/initiation, lifestyle or adherence counseling, evaluation ordered, or interpretation with no change. Characteristics of children with/without 1 or more actions were compared using Student t-tests and Chi-square. Regression analyses explored the independent association of patient characteristics with physician action. RESULTS: 115 patients with masked (n = 53) and ambulatory (n = 62) hypertension were included: mean age 13.0 years, 48% female, 38% Black race, 21% with chronic kidney disease, and 25% overweight/obesity. 97 (84%) encounters had a documented physician action. Medication change (52%), evaluation ordered (40%), and prescribed lifestyle change (35%) were the most common actions. Adherence counseling for medication and lifestyle recommendations were documented in 3% of encounters. 24-h, wake SBP load, and sleep DBP load were significantly higher among those with physician action. Patients with > 1 action had greater adiposity, SBP, and dipping. Neither age, obesity, nor kidney disease were independently associated with physician action. CONCLUSIONS: While most abnormal ABPMs were acted upon, 16% did not have a documented action. Greater BP load was one of the few characteristics associated with physician action. Of potential actions, adherence counseling was underutilized.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension , Humans , Female , Male , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Child , Retrospective Studies , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/physiopathology , Young Adult , Child, Preschool , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Blood Pressure/physiology , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology
7.
J Assoc Physicians India ; 72(3): 79-81, 2024 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38736122

ABSTRACT

Blood pressure (BP) measurement is affected by multiple variables which influence clinical management decisions and patient outcomes. Around 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) avoids incorrect diagnosis of hypertension (HT), and unnecessary treatment and provides the best prediction of cardiovascular (CV) risk. Clinically important phenotypes of HT such as masked HT (masked HT), white coat HT (white coat HT), and nocturnal HT (nocturnal HT) may be missed by not incorporating ambulatory BP monitoring in practice. However, lack of device availability, operational difficulties, and cost remain barriers to its widespread acceptance in India. In this review, we discuss the when, what, who, why, and where (5Ws) relevant to ABPM measurement.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension , Humans , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , Blood Pressure/physiology , India
8.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 163(1): 25-31, 2024 Jul 12.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38570293

ABSTRACT

Ambulatory Blood Pressure Monitoring (ABPM) is considered the best method for obtaining a reliable estimation of the true blood pressure. Average values obtained during the whole 24-hour period, or during daytime and nighttime periods are better correlated with the risk of mortality and cardiovascular disease compared to clinic or office blood pressure. Indeed, nighttime blood pressure, a measure only obtained through ABPM, is the most powerful risk predictor. ABPM is complementary to clinic blood pressure measurement and allows the definition of blood pressure phenotypes, such as "white-coat or masked hypertension, when clinic and ABPM measurements show discrepancy in normal values. Additional potentially relevant features include blood pressure variability, such as nocturnal blood pressure decline, morning surge or short-term variability, as determined by standard deviation or the coefficient of variation.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Forecasting , Hypertension , Humans , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory/methods , Hypertension/diagnosis , Circadian Rhythm/physiology , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Blood Pressure
9.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(8): 621-630, 2024 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38625716

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to elucidate the prognostic role of Masked Morning Hypertension (MMH) in non-dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (NDD-CKD). METHODS: 2,130 NDD-CKD patients of the inpatient department were categorized into four blood pressure (BP) groups: clinical normotension (CH-), clinical hypertension (CH+) with morning hypertension (MH+), and without MH+ (MH-) respectively. The correlation between these four BP types and the primary (all-cause mortality) and secondary endpoints (cardio-cerebrovascular disease [CVD] and end-stage kidney disease [ESKD]) was analyzed. RESULTS: The prevalence of MH and MMH were 47.4% and 14.98%, respectively. Morning hypertension independently increased the risk of all-cause mortality (P = 0.004) and CVD (P < 0.001) but not ESKD (P = 0.092). Masked morning hypertension was associated with heightened all-cause mortality (HR = 4.22, 95% CI = 1.31-13.59; P = 0.02) and CVD events (HR = 5.14, 95% CI = 1.37-19.23; P = 0.02), with no significant association with ESKD (HR = 1.18, 95% CI = 0.65-2.15; P = 0.60). When considering non-CVD deaths as a competing risk factor, a high cumulative incidence of CVD events was observed in the MMH group (HR = 5.16, 95% CI = 1.39-19.08). CONCLUSIONS: MMH is an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and combined cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events in NDD-CKD patients, underscoring its prognostic significance. This highlights the need for comprehensive management of MH in this population.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/physiopathology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/epidemiology , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/diagnosis , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/complications , Aged , Prognosis , China/epidemiology , Prevalence , Risk Factors , Circadian Rhythm , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Inpatients , Kidney Failure, Chronic/epidemiology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/physiopathology , Kidney Failure, Chronic/mortality , Time Factors , Risk Assessment , Cause of Death , Cardiovascular Diseases/epidemiology , Cardiovascular Diseases/mortality , East Asian People
10.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(8): 561-570, 2024 07 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38661395

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The increasing prevalence of childhood obesity has led to a corresponding increase in hypertension among children, necessitating early identification of subclinical target organ damage for accurate cardiovascular risk assessment. However, in the pediatric population, there is a paucity of literature comparing ambulatory and home blood pressure monitoring, and this knowledge gap is exacerbated by limited access to ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) facilities, particularly in developing countries, where pediatricians often resort to home blood BP monitoring as the preferred option. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study with 60 obese children (aged 5-18 years) at tertiary health care in central India, we aimed to comprehensively characterize blood pressure profiles, including office, ambulatory, and home, and investigated their correlations with indicators of end-organ damage. RESULTS: Among 60 children, 26 (43.3%) participants were found to be hypertensive based on 24-hour-ABPM evaluation. Masked hypertension (MH) and white coat hypertension (WCH) were observed in 21.6% and 13.3%, respectively. Surprisingly, 20% of participants were identified as hypertensive through 7-day home BP monitoring (HBPM). A notable discordance of 36.6% was between HBPM and ABPM results. Moreover, 26.7% of the children had end-organ damage, with higher odds associated with night-time systolic ambulatory hypertension in the adjusted regression model (OR = 1.06, 95% CI: 1.03-1.10, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights 24-hour ABPM's vital role in classifying hypertensive status, especially in high-risk children. The diagnostic performance of HBPM shows poor sensitivity in detecting MH and lower specificity in identifying WCH compared to ABPM. This limitation translates to missed opportunities for early preventive interventions.


Subject(s)
Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Pediatric Obesity , Humans , Child , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adolescent , Pediatric Obesity/physiopathology , Pediatric Obesity/diagnosis , Pediatric Obesity/epidemiology , Pediatric Obesity/complications , Child, Preschool , India/epidemiology , Blood Pressure , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/physiopathology , Hypertension/epidemiology , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/physiopathology , White Coat Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/physiopathology , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Predictive Value of Tests , Prevalence
11.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(5): 358-365, 2024 04 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38323455

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An important prevalence (32%-45%) of masked hypertension has been reported in children with sickle cell disease (SCD). Stroke screening is well established using transcranial Doppler (TCD) ultrasound. The objectives of our proof-of-concept study in childhood SCD were to evaluate the prevalence of hypertension and its relationships with cerebral vasculopathy (TCD velocity) and to further evaluate in a subgroup of children the correlations of cardiovascular autonomic nervous system indices with TCD velocity. METHODS: Ambulatory blood pressure measurement (ABPM) and TCD velocity were obtained in children with SCD and in a restricted sample, cardiac sympathovagal balance using heart rate variability analyses, baroreflex sensitivity, and pulse wave velocity were measured. RESULTS: In 41 children with SCD (median age 14.0 years, 19 girls, SS/Sß + thalassemia/SC: 33/2/6), ABPM results showed masked hypertension in 2/41 (5%, 95% confidence interval, 0-11) children, consistent with the prevalence in the general pediatric population, elevated blood pressure (BP) in 4/41 (10%) children, and a lack of a normal nocturnal dip in 19/41 children (46%). Children with increased TCD velocity had lower nocturnal dipping of systolic BP. In the 10 participants with extensive cardiovascular assessment, increased TCD velocity was associated with parasympathetic withdrawal and baroreflex failure. Exaggerated orthostatic pressor response or orthostatic hypertension was observed in 7/10 children that was linked to parasympathetic withdrawal. CONCLUSIONS: Autonomic nervous system dysfunction, namely loss of parasympathetic modulation, of SCD contributes to increase TCD velocity but is not associated with an increased prevalence of masked hypertension. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: NCT04911049.


Subject(s)
Anemia, Sickle Cell , Masked Hypertension , Stroke , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Anemia, Sickle Cell/complications , Anemia, Sickle Cell/diagnosis , Anemia, Sickle Cell/epidemiology , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/complications , Prevalence , Pulse Wave Analysis , Stroke/prevention & control , Male
12.
Pediatr Nephrol ; 39(2): 531-537, 2024 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37672081

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: One of the long-term complications after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is hypertension (HT). Previous studies showed that 10-15% of children post-HSCT had office HT, but only a few studies used ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). The present study was aimed at exploring the frequency and factors associated with ABPM HT in children post-HSCT. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 6 years who survived ≥ 2 years after HSCT were enrolled. Clinical and ABPM data were reviewed. ABPM HT was defined according to the 2022 American Heart Association guidelines. Factors associated with HT were analyzed by logistic regression. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (60 males) patients with a mean age of 15.1 years and a median follow-up time at 4.5 years after HSCT were included. Fifteen patients (15.3%) had ABPM HT (2 ambulatory HT and 13 masked HT). The ABPM HT group had a significantly older age (19 vs. 14 years), a higher proportion of males (87% vs. 57%), a higher office systolic BP index (0.93 vs. 0.85), a higher office diastolic BP index (0.96 vs. 0.82) and a higher proportion of current use of prednisolone and tacrolimus than those in the normal ABPM group. Multivariate analysis revealed that office diastolic BP index was associated with ABPM HT. Left ventricular mass index was significantly correlated with ABPM but not with office BP parameters. CONCLUSIONS: HT in children post-HSCT was not uncommon and most could not be detected with office BP measurement. A diastolic BP index can be used as a screening tool for HT. A higher resolution version of the Graphical abstract is available as Supplementary information.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Male , Child , Humans , Adolescent , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension/diagnosis , Blood Pressure , Blood Pressure Determination , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis
13.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(3): 220-229, 2024 Feb 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37758228

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy and other adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) increase the risk of developing chronic hypertension and cardiovascular disease. Perceptions of stress and neighborhood context also influence blood pressure (BP) fluctuations. We examined if APOs, higher perceived stress, and neighborhood deprivation were associated with hypertension phenotypes a decade after pregnancy in untreated individuals. METHODS: Participants were 360 individuals who gave birth between 2008 and 2009 and participated in a research study 8-10 years following pregnancy. Standardized office and home BP readings were obtained, and we applied the AHA/ACC 2017 guidelines to identify sustained, white coat, and masked hypertension phenotypes. We measured personal stress with the perceived stress scale and neighborhood deprivation with the CDC Social Vulnerability Index. RESULTS: Of the 38.3% (138/360) with any hypertension, 26.1% (36/138) reported a diagnosis of hypertension but were currently untreated. Sustained hypertension was the most common (17.8%), followed by masked and white coat hypertension, both 10.3%. Hypertensive disorders in pregnancy were associated with sustained (odds ratio [OR] 5.54 [95% confidence interval, CI 2.46, 12.46] and white coat phenotypes (OR 4.20 [1.66, 10.60], but not masked hypertension (OR 1.74 [0.62, 4.90]). Giving birth to a small for gestational age infant was also associated with sustained hypertension. In covariate adjusted models, perceived stress, but not neighborhood deprivation, was significantly associated with masked hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: A decade after delivery, APOs were associated with sustained and white coat hypertension, but not masked hypertension. Exploration of the mechanisms underlying, and clinical implications of, these associations is warranted.


Subject(s)
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced , Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Pre-Eclampsia , Psychological Tests , Self Report , White Coat Hypertension , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/diagnosis , Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced/epidemiology , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/drug therapy , Blood Pressure/physiology , Phenotype , Stress, Psychological/diagnosis , Stress, Psychological/epidemiology
14.
Am J Hypertens ; 37(1): 53-59, 2024 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37195645

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Emerging evidence suggests that a hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) during dynamic or isometric stress tests assessing cardiac function is predictive of hypertension and cardiovascular events such coronary artery disease, heart failure and stroke. Whether HRE represents a marker of masked hypertension (MH) in individuals with no prior history of hypertension is still unclear. This is also the case for the association between MH and hypertension-mediated organ damage (HMOD) in the HRE setting. METHODS: We addressed this issue through a review and a meta-analysis of studies providing data on this topic in normotensive individuals undergone both to dynamic or static exercise and to 24-h blood pressure monitoring (ABPM). A systematic search was performed using Pub-Med, OVID, EMBASE and Cochrane library databases from inception up to February 28th 2023. RESULTS: Six studies including a total of 1,155 untreated clinically normotensive individuals were considered for the review. Data provided by the selected studies can be summarized as follows: (i) HRE is a BP phenotype linked to a high prevalence of MH (27.3% in the pooled population); (ii) MH is, in turn, associated with a greater, consistent likelihood of echocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (OR: 4.93, CI: 2.16-12.2, P < 0.0001) and vascular organ damage, as assessed by pulse wave velocity, (SMD: 0.34 ±â€…0.11, CI: 0.12-0.56, P = 0002). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this, albeit limited, evidence, the diagnostic work-up in individuals with HRE should primarily be addressed to look for MH as well as for markers of HMOD, a highly prevalent alteration in MH.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Humans , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Pulse Wave Analysis , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Blood Pressure/physiology , Echocardiography , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory
16.
Hypertension ; 80(11): 2280-2292, 2023 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37737026

ABSTRACT

Masked hypertension (MH) occurs when office blood pressure is normal, but hypertension is confirmed using out-of-office blood pressure measures. Hypertension is a risk factor for subclinical cardiovascular outcomes, including left ventricular hypertrophy, increased left ventricular mass index, carotid intima media thickness, and pulse wave velocity. However, the risk factors for ambulatory blood pressure monitoring defined MH and its association with subclinical cardiovascular outcomes are unclear. A systematic literature search on 9 databases included English publications from 1974 to 2023. Pediatric MH prevalence was stratified by disease comorbidities and compared with the general pediatric population. We also compared the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy, and mean differences in left ventricular mass index, carotid intima media thickness, and pulse wave velocity between MH versus normotensive pediatric patients. Of 2199 screened studies, 136 studies (n=28 612; ages 4-25 years) were included. The prevalence of MH in the general pediatric population was 10.4% (95% CI, 8.00-12.80). Compared with the general pediatric population, the risk ratio (RR) of MH was significantly greater in children with coarctation of the aorta (RR, 1.91), solid-organ or stem-cell transplant (RR, 2.34), chronic kidney disease (RR, 2.44), and sickle cell disease (RR, 1.33). MH patients had increased risk of subclinical cardiovascular outcomes compared with normotensive patients, including higher left ventricular mass index (mean difference, 3.86 g/m2.7 [95% CI, 2.51-5.22]), left ventricular hypertrophy (odds ratio, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.50-3.96]), and higher pulse wave velocity (mean difference, 0.30 m/s [95% CI, 0.14-0.45]). The prevalence of MH is significantly elevated among children with various comorbidities. Children with MH have evidence of subclinical cardiovascular outcomes, which increases their risk of long-term cardiovascular disease.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Humans , Child , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertrophy, Left Ventricular , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Carotid Intima-Media Thickness , Prevalence , Pulse Wave Analysis/adverse effects , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Blood Pressure/physiology
17.
Arq Bras Cardiol ; 120(8): e20220863, 2023 07.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37586005

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: It is known that around 30% of patients have higher blood pressure (BP) values when examined at the office than at home. Worldwide, only 35% of patients with hypertension undergoing treatment have reached their BP targets. OBJECTIVE: To provide epidemiological data on BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists, considering office and home BP measurement. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional analysis of patients with a hypertension diagnosis and undergoing antihypertensive treatment, with controlled BP or not. BP was assayed in the office by a medical professional and at home using home BP monitoring (HBPM). The association between categorical variables was verified using the chi-square test (p<0.05). RESULTS: The study included 2540 patients, with a mean age of 59.7 ± 15.2 years. Most patients were women (62%; n=1575). Prevalence rates of 15% (n=382) for uncontrolled white coat hypertension and 10% (n=253) for uncontrolled masked hypertension were observed. The rate of BP control in the office was 56.3% and at home, 61%. Meanwhile, 46.4% of the patients had controlled BP in and outside of the office. Greater control was observed in women and in the 49-61 years age group. Considering the new DBHA 2020 threshold for home BP control, the control rate was 42.4%. CONCLUSION: BP control in the offices of a sample of Brazilian cardiologists was 56.3%; this rate was 61% when BP was measured at home and 46.4% when considering both the office and home.


FUNDAMENTO: Sabe-se que em torno de 30% dos pacientes apresentam valores de pressão arterial (PA) mais elevados quando examinados no consultório do que em suas residências. No mundo, admite-se que apenas 35% dos hipertensos já tratados tenham alcançado meta pressórica. OBJETIVO: Fornecer dados epidemiológicos sobre o controle da PA nos consultórios, em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros, avaliado pela medida de consultório e monitorização residencial da pressão arterial (MRPA). MÉTODOS: Análise transversal. Observou-se pacientes com diagnóstico de hipertensão arterial, em tratamento anti-hipertensivo, podendo ou não estar com a PA controlada. A PA foi verificada no consultório por profissional médico, e no domicílio através da MRPA. A associação entre variáveis categóricas se deu por meio do teste do qui-quadrado (p < 0,05). RESULTADOS: Foram incluídos 2.540 pacientes, com idade média 59,7 ± 15,2 anos. A maioria dos pacientes eram mulheres (62%; n = 1.575). O estudo mostrou uma prevalência de 15% (n = 382) de hipertensão do avental branco não controlada, e 10% (n = 253) de hipertensão mascarada não controlada. A taxa de controle da PA no consultório foi 56,3%, e no domicílio, de 61%; 46,4% dos pacientes tiveram PA controlada no consultório e fora dele. Observou-se maior controle no sexo feminino e na faixa etária 49-61 anos. Observando o controle domiciliar com o novo ponto de corte das Diretrizes Brasileiras de Hipertensão Arterial de 2020, a taxa de controle foi de 42,4%. CONCLUSÃO: O controle pressórico nos consultórios em uma amostra de cardiologistas brasileiros foi de 56,3%; 61% quando a PA foi obtida no domicílio, e 46,4% quando o controle foi observado tanto no consultório como no domicílio.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , White Coat Hypertension , Humans , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/drug therapy , Hypertension/epidemiology , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , Blood Pressure Determination , Antihypertensive Agents/therapeutic use , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Blood Pressure
18.
Curr Hypertens Rep ; 25(9): 231-242, 2023 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37639176

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal is to review masked hypertension (MH) as a relatively new phenomenon when patients have normal office BP but elevated out-of-office BP. Firstly, it was described in children in 2004. It has received increased attention in the past decade. RECENT FINDINGS: The prevalence of MH in different pediatric populations differs widely between 0 and 60% based on the population studied, definition of MH, or method of out-of-office BP measurement. The highest prevalence of MH has been demonstrated in children with chronic kidney disease (CKD), obesity, diabetes, and after heart transplantation. In healthy children but with risk factors for hypertension such as prematurity, overweight/obesity, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or positive family history of hypertension, the prevalence of MH is 9%. In healthy children without risk factors for hypertension, the prevalence of MH is very low ranging 0-3%. In healthy children, only patients with the following clinical conditions should be screened for MH: high-normal/elevated office BP, positive family history of hypertension, and those referred for suspected hypertension who have normal office BP in the secondary/tertiary center.


Subject(s)
Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic , Humans , Adolescent , Child , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Obesity
19.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 9751, 2023 06 16.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37328567

ABSTRACT

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is prevalent in individuals with essential hypertension (HTN). Masked hypertension occurs in up to 15% of the general population and is associated with adverse clinical outcome. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the prevalence of masked hypertension in apparently normotensive individuals with lone AF. A cross sectional analytical study performed at the Rabin Medical Center included all patients > 18 years who visited the emergency department (ED) in the years 2018-2021 with idiopathic AF, had normal blood pressure (BP) values during their ED visit and did not have a history of hypertension or current use of anti-hypertensives. Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) was performed in all eligible patients within 30 days from ED visit. Data collected included information from the ED visit and data extracted from the monitoring device. A total of 1258 patients were screened for eligibility, of which 40 were included in the analysis. The average age was 53.4 ± 16 years, 28 patients (70%) were males. Overall, 18 individuals (46%) had abnormal BP values according to the 2017 ACC/AHA guidelines for the diagnosis of hypertension. Of these, 12 had abnormal 24-h BP average (≥ 125/75 mmHg), one had isolated daytime abnormal average (≥ 130/80 mmHg) and 11 had isolated night time abnormal average (≥ 110/65 mmHg). Masked hypertension is prevalent in patients with lone AF without a diagnosis of HTN and performing ABPM in such individuals should be strongly considered.


Subject(s)
Atrial Fibrillation , Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , Male , Humans , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Female , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/complications , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Atrial Fibrillation/diagnosis , Atrial Fibrillation/epidemiology , Atrial Fibrillation/complications , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Blood Pressure/physiology
20.
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed) ; 76(11): 852-861, 2023 Nov.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182724

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Hypertension is highly common in heart failure (HF). However, there is limited information on its prevalence, circadian variation, and relationship with the various HF phenotypes. The objective of this study was to describe the prevalence of hypertension and its patterns in HF. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional observational study of patients with optimized stable chronic HF. The patients underwent blood pressure (BP) measurement in the office and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring. We estimated the prevalence of hypertension, and its diurnal (controlled, uncontrolled, white coat, and masked) and nocturnal (dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper) patterns. We also analyzed the factors associated with the different patterns and HF phenotypes. RESULTS: From 2017 to 2021, 266 patients were included in the study (mean age, 72±12 years, 67% male, 46% with reduced ejection fraction). Hypertension was present in 83%: controlled in 68%, uncontrolled in 10%, white coat in 10%, and masked in 11%. Among patients with high office BP, 51% had white coat hypertension. Among those with normal office BP, 14% had masked hypertension. The prevalence of dipper, nondipper, and reverse dipper patterns was 31%, 43%, and 26%, respectively. Systolic BP was lower in HF with reduced ejection fraction than in HF with preserved ejection fraction (P <.001). CONCLUSIONS: Ambulatory BP monitoring in HF identified white coat hypertension in more than half of patients with high office BP and masked hypertension in a relevant percentage of patients. The distribution of daytime patterns was similar to that of the population without HF in the literature, but most of the study patients had a pathological nocturnal pattern.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure , Hypertension , Masked Hypertension , White Coat Hypertension , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , White Coat Hypertension/diagnosis , White Coat Hypertension/epidemiology , White Coat Hypertension/complications , Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory , Masked Hypertension/diagnosis , Masked Hypertension/epidemiology , Masked Hypertension/complications , Prevalence , Cross-Sectional Studies , Hypertension/diagnosis , Hypertension/epidemiology , Hypertension/complications , Blood Pressure/physiology , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Heart Failure/complications , Circadian Rhythm/physiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL