Office procedures for older adults by physician associates and nurse practitioners.

OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that physician associate (PA) and nurse practitioner (NP) procedural roles are expanding. We sought to describe ambulatory procedures these professionals performed in 2021 for older adults. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort study of Medicare Part B data. US Bureau of Labor Statistics data were used to provide overall PA and NP employment context. METHODS: Medicare Part B databases were probed for outpatient events by PAs and NPs using a modified list of the Council of Academic Family Medicine's recommended clinical procedures that focused on 29 procedures organized into 9 categories called procedure clusters. These procedures were linked to Current Procedural Terminology codes and PA and NP National Provider Identifier codes in Medicare Part B and then tabulated and analyzed for 2021. The Bureau of Labor Statistics provided NP and PA employment trends for context. The trend of the procedures and providers spanning 2014-2021 was analyzed. RESULTS: In 2021, 23,581 NPs and PAs filed 9.6 million Medicare Part B enrollee procedure claims. Most procedures (96%) involved skin or the musculoskeletal system. PAs filed more than twice as many claims for skin and musculoskeletal procedures as NPs, and NPs filed 1.25 times as many as PAs for the eye, ear, nose, and throat; pulmonary; genitourinary; gastrointestinal-colorectal; and women's health categories. From 2014 through 2021, the number of PAs and NPs in clinical practice increased by 72%, and the number of those who filed procedure claims increased by 74%. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, PAs performed more skin and musculoskeletal procedures than NPs, and NPs performed more procedures in the other 7 procedure clusters than PAs. PA and NP employment growth does not fully explain these observations. We suggest that outpatient procedural task-shifting activity presents an area for further research.

Characteristics of 340B Hospitals Receiving Medicare Part B Repayments.

This cross-sectional study compared the characteristics of 340B hospitals that did not receive a lump sum payment with hospitals in the program that did receive payment.

ACO Clinicians Have Higher Medicare Part B Medical Services Payments Than MIPS Clinicians Under the Quality Payment Program.

The Quality Payment Program (QPP) is a Medicare value-based payment program with 2 tracks: -Advanced Alternative Payment Models (A-APMs), including two-sided risk Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs), and Merit-based Incentive Payment System (MIPS). In 2020, A-APM eligible ACO clinicians received an additional 5% positive, and MIPS clinicians received up to 5% negative or 2% positive performance-based adjustments to their Medicare Part B medical services payments. It is unclear whether the different payment adjustments have differential impacts on total medical services payments for ACO and MIPS participants. We compare Medicare Part B medical services payments received by primary care clinicians participating in ACO and MIPS programs using Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment Public Use Files from 2014 to 2018 using difference-in-differences regressions. We have 254 395 observations from 50 879 unique clinicians (ACO = 37.86%; MIPS = 62.14%). Regression results suggest that ACO clinicians have significantly higher Medicare Part B medical services payments ($1003.88; 95% CI: [579.08, 1428.69]) when compared to MIPS clinicians. Our findings suggest that ACO clinicians had a greater increase in medical services payments when compared to MIPS clinicians following QPP participation. Increased payments for Medicare Part B medical services among ACO clinicians may be driven partly by higher payment adjustment rates for ACO clinicians for Part B medical services. However, increased Part B medical services payments could also reflect clinicians switching to increased outpatient services to prevent potentially costly inpatient services. Policymakers should examine both aspects when evaluating QPP effectiveness.

Retraining transplant pharmacy staff to reduce Medicare Part B prescription billing errors post-transplant.

BACKGROUND: Medicare Part B (MedB) imposes penalties for certain errors in prescription billing of post-transplant medications, which can greatly affect pharmacy revenue. To prevent MedB billing fines, pharmacy staff must be cognizant of specific MedB requirements. OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement project aimed to retrain certified pharmacy technicians (CPhTs) on common billing errors and evaluate changes in error rates and potential fines after retraining. We aimed to determine whether retraining CPhTs minimizes MedB prescription billing errors and reduces potential fines owed by the Vanderbilt Transplant Pharmacy (VTP) to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). METHODS: This was a single-center, quality improvement study including post-transplant patients with at least one MedB prescription billing error who filled prescriptions through VTP. All CPhTs involved in MedB prescription billing received retraining focused on the top 3 errors in MedB billing identified at VTP: early refills, missing relationship of caller to patient and residence of patient on order documentation, or no day supply remaining recorded on the order file. Retraining consisted of developing a training checklist, testing current knowledge levels, individualized nonpunitive coaching based on technician specific errors, and retesting for knowledge retention. Outcomes included the number of prescriptions with at least one MedB prescription billing error and the projected amount of dollars fined owing to errors recorded during the 3 months before and 3 months after retraining. RESULTS: Fourteen CPhTs received retraining. Average refill too soon errors decreased by 37.5% (10.7% vs. 6.7%), average missing relationship by 21.7% (7.7% vs. 6%), and day supply errors by 39.7% (1.7% vs. 1%). Error reductions equaled a 28.2% decrease (approximately $12,700) in potential fines. CONCLUSION: Retraining focused on MedB billing error successfully reduced error frequency and fines from CMS. MedB billing error fines can be costly for pharmacies dispensing high-cost medications; therefore, identifying common errors and training staff can be useful and financially prudent.

Trends in magnetic resonance and computed tomography angiography utilization among Medicare beneficiaries between 2013 and 2020.

PURPOSE: To evaluate relative and absolute utilization trends and practice patterns in the United States for MRA and CTA. METHODS: Using Medicare Part B physician payment databases (2013-2020), MRA and CTA interpreting physicians and exams were identified using the unique MRA and CTA Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. The number of exams, physicians, demographics, use of contrast, and payments were summarized annually and analyzed to evaluate trends before and during the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. RESULTS: From 2013 to 2019, the annual number of MRA exams performed decreased by 17.9 %, while the number of CTA exams increased by 90.3 %. The number of physicians interpreting MRA decreased in both hospital (-17.2 %) and outpatient (-7.5 %) environments. The number of physicians interpreting CTA increased in both hospital (+29.4 %) and outpatient (+54.3 %) environments. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, MRA utilization decreased across all imaging environments by 25.0 % whereas CTA only decreased by 5.5 %. Intracranial MRA studies were most often performed without contrast, while contrast use for neck MRA was performed at similar rates as non-contrast exams. CONCLUSION: The overall utilization of MRA and the number of interpreting physicians are decreasing. On the other hand, CTA use and its number of interpreting physicians are increasing. During the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic, use of both MRA and CTA decreased, but the utilization of MRA decreased at five times the rate of CTA.

Characterizing Trends in Chronic Superficial Venous Disease Treatment among Medicare Beneficiaries from 2010 to 2018.

This study describes trends in surgical versus endovascular interventions for treatment of chronic superficial venous disease (SVD) in the Medicare population. Medicare Part B data from 2010 to 2018 were obtained. Claims for SVD treatment were identified using Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System codes. Total percentage change in utilization rates and market share was determined for each provider group. Utilization of SVD treatments increased by 58%, mostly owing to growing utilization of endovascular treatments. There was a 66% decrease in surgical treatments. The utilization of ablation and sclerotherapy plateaued in 2016 and decreased in 2017-2018 with the advent of mechanochemical ablation, endovenous microfoam, and cyanoacrylate adhesive, respectively. Analysis showed that endovascular utilization increased across most specialties, with the largest growth seen in cardiology by 427%. Radiologists showed utilization growth of 125%, encompassing 11% of the market share. Endovascular treatment for SVD remains predominant, with increased utilization and concomitant decrease in surgical methods.

Medicare drug price negotiation: The complexities of selecting therapeutic alternatives for estimating comparative effectiveness.

Under the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are able to negotiate prices for topselling drugs in the Medicare Part B and D programs. In determining initial price offers, CMS will compare the prices and clinical benefits of the drugs subject to negotiation to the prices and clinical benefits of therapeutic alternatives. Despite the central role that the selection of therapeutic alternatives will play in the price negotiations, the available guidance published by CMS provides few details about how the organization will undertake this process, which will be particularly complex for drugs approved for more than one indication. To better inform the selection process, we identified all US Food and Drug Administration-approved indications for the first 10 drugs subject to negotiation. Using 2020-2021 Medicare claims data, we identified Medicare Part D beneficiaries using each of the 10 drugs. We extracted medical claims with diagnosis codes for each of the approved indications to report the relative treated prevalence of use by indication for each drug. We reviewed published clinical guidelines to identify relevant therapeutic alternatives for each of the indications. We integrated the evidence on the relative treated prevalence of indications and clinical guidelines to propose therapeutic alternatives for each of the 10 drugs. We describe challenges that CMS may face in selecting therapeutic alternatives.

A Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Analysis of Reimbursement Trends in Laryngology from 2000 to 2021.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to characterize Medicare reimbursement trends for laryngology procedures over the last two decades. METHODS: This analysis used CMS' Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Look-Up Tool to determine the reimbursement rate of 48 common laryngology procedures, which were divided into four groups based on their practice setting and clinical use: office-based, airway, voice disorders, and dysphagia. The PFS reports the physician service reimbursement for "facilities" and global reimbursement for "non-facilities". The annual reimbursement rate for each procedure was averaged across all localities and adjusted for inflation. The compound annual growth rate (CAGR) of each procedure's reimbursement was determined, and a weighted average of the CAGR for each group of procedures was calculated using each procedure's 2020 Medicare Part B utilization. RESULTS: Reimbursement for laryngology procedure (CPT) codes has declined over the last two decades. In facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office-based procedures was -2.0%, for airway procedures was -2.2%, for voice disorders procedures was -1.4%, and for dysphagia procedures was -1.7%. In non-facilities, the weighted average CAGR for office-based procedures was -0.9%. The procedures in the other procedure groups did not have a corresponding non-facility reimbursement rate. CONCLUSION: Like other otolaryngology subspecialties, inflation-adjusted reimbursements for common laryngology procedures have decreased substantially over the past two decades. Because of the large number of physician participants and patient enrollees in the Medicare programs, increased awareness and further research into the implications of these trends on patient care is necessary to ensure quality in the delivery of laryngology care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 134:247-256, 2024.

Glaucoma Surgery Shifts Among Medicare Beneficiaries After 2022 Reimbursement Changes in the United States.

PRCIS: This study revealed the best-estimated surgical procedural counts for 2021 and 2022 and suggests a direct influence of coding and reimbursement changes on surgical device selection. PURPOSE: To analyze utilization rates of glaucoma surgeries and minimally invasive (microinvasive) glaucoma surgery among US Medicare beneficiaries between 2021 and 2022. DESIGN: Retrospective comparative analysis of 68,118 unique patients. METHODS: National claims data from a 5% sample of all Medicare beneficiaries were utilized to compare glaucoma procedure counts between the first quarter of 2021 and the first quarter of 2022. Duplicate claims were excluded, and 50 modifiers were counted as 2 distinct procedures. A multiplier was applied to estimate annual utilization for the entire Medicare population. χ 2 analysis was employed to compare categorical data from the 2 time periods. RESULTS: Current Procedural Terminology codes for angle-based stenting decreased by an estimated 20,960 procedures between 2021 and 2022 (28.60%). Goniotomy increased by an estimated 11,680 procedures (66.97%) and canaloplasty increased by an estimated 6640 procedures (47.43%). Glaucoma surgeries decreased by an estimated 5760 procedures (4.25%) despite an increase of cataract surgery by 234,960 procedures (15.63%), an increase in YAG capsulotomy by 19,280 procedures (3.31%), and an increase in intravitreal injections by 146,320 procedures (3.86%). CONCLUSION: Despite overall surgical volume increases among the ophthalmology procedures, angle-based stenting utilization decreased significantly with an accompanying trend change following the coding and reimbursement changes implemented in January 2022. Of the minimally invasive (microinvasive) glaucoma surgery procedures, goniotomy and canaloplasty counts increased the most between these periods. Trabeculectomy and glaucoma drainage device procedures continued to decrease, following well-established trends. Future studies are warranted to examine how these shifts in utilization may impact patient care outcomes.

Analysis of Medicare Expenditure for Discarded Infused Cancer Therapeutics From 2017-2020.

OBJECTIVE: To explore patterns in Medicare reimbursement for wasted oncologic and hematologic infusion drugs from 2017 to 2020 and estimate the savings that implementation of the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (IIJA) would have had. METHODS: Using the publicly available Medicare Part B Discarded Drug Units database, we analyzed reimbursement data for discarded antineoplastic and hematology therapies from 2017 to 2020. RESULTS: Medicare Part B utilization data was extracted for 77 therapies. From 2017 to 2020, the median annual dollar value of discarded therapies was $590 million. Every year, bortezomib, azacitidine, cabazitaxel, and decitabine were among the most wasted products, an average 24% waste. The IIJA policy would have impacted a median of 20 oncology agents and resulted in median annual refund of $172 million. Had the top five most discarded therapies been redistributed, they could have treated 18,289 patients. The five most wasted drugs were all dosed by weight and distributed in single-use vials. CONCLUSION: The IIJA could potentially significantly reduce waste or encourage redistribution to treat thousands of additional patients. We propose that a fusion of fixed and weight-based dosing may help reduce wasteful medication administration by offering doses that better accommodate most patients. We anticipate that manufacturers will adapt to the IIJA perhaps by adjusting fixed doses or simply increasing drug prices. If price changes from dose delivery adjustment occur, rebates offered to pharmacy benefit managers and insurers will likely follow suit and may alter formulary positioning.

Medicare Part B Spending on Macular Degeneration Treatments Associated With Manufacturer Payments to Ophthalmologists.

Importance: Age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) therapies aflibercept and ranibizumab are among the highest-cost Medicare Part B drugs, even though off-label use of lower-cost bevacizumab is clinically noninferior. Payments from manufacturers of these ARMD therapies to ophthalmologists are hypothesized to be factors in ophthalmologists' therapeutic choice, controlling for ophthalmologist and patient characteristics. Objective: To assess the association between manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists and choice of ARMD treatment as well as to identify ophthalmologist-level characteristics associated with prescribing lower-cost ARMD therapies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cross-sectional study of longitudinal (2013-2019) Medicare Part B data was conducted from December 2021 to December 2022. Ophthalmologists prescribing aflibercept (manufactured by Regeneron Pharmaceuticals Inc), rabinizumab, or bevacizumab (both manufactured by Genentech Inc) for ARMD treatment of Medicare Part B beneficiaries were included. Data on manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were obtained from the Open Payments database. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the percentage of bevacizumab prescribed by ophthalmologists among all ARMD therapies. Regression analysis assessed variation in bevacizumab prescribing by acceptance of manufacturer payments as well as by ophthalmologist and patient characteristics. Ophthalmologist characteristics were duration of practice and Medicare Administrative Contractor region, and patient characteristics were aggregated at the ophthalmologist level and included mean beneficiary age, percentage of dual-eligible beneficiaries, mean beneficiary risk score, and percentage of White beneficiaries. Savings were estimated by projecting the change in bevacizumab use had ophthalmologists not accepted manufacturer payments, controlling for all ophthalmologist and patient characteristics and comparing with observed use and costs. Results: A total of 21 584 ophthalmologists (18 489 males [85.7%]) were included. Ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments were significantly less likely to prescribe bevacizumab (28.0% [95% CI, 24.6%-42.5%] of patients) compared with those who did not accept manufacturer payments (45.8% [95% CI, 44.5%-47.1%]). Ophthalmologists who saw dual-eligible beneficiaries had greater bevacizumab prescribing (50.0% [95% CI, 40.6%-68.3%] in the highest quartile vs 36.1% [95% CI, 33.5%-38.8%] in the lowest quartile; ß coefficient, 0.139; P < .001), while those who saw patients with higher mean beneficiary risk scores had lower bevacizumab use (38.0% [95% CI, 23.7%-44.1%] in the highest quartile vs 48.2% [95% CI, 45.5%-50.8%] in the lowest quartile; ß coefficient, -0.102, P < .001). Had ophthalmologists who accepted manufacturer payments prescribed ARMD drugs as those who did not accept payments, Medicare spending on these treatments would have been $642 779 703.08 lower from 2013 to 2019, a 2.0% savings. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest that drug manufacturer payments to ophthalmologists were associated with selection of higher-cost therapies for ARMD, which is a factor in increased Medicare and patient spending. Development of manufacturer payment models that encourage ophthalmologists to choose lower-cost therapies are needed.

Spending on and Use of Clinician-Administered Drugs in Medicare.

Importance: Medicare Part B drug expenditures have increased in recent years. This trend is likely to persist given the increased use and availability of biologics. Objectives: To assess the extent to which Medicare Part B spending growth was associated with changes in price vs quantity, and how these trends interacted with entry of new drugs into the marketplace. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study quantified the degree of spending concentration and the association between price and use of Part B drugs among fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries. Data on use and spending for separately payable Part B drugs were included. Source data were aggregated to the drug-year level and reported from 2016 to 2020. Descriptive decomposition and index analyses quantified the relative association of price and use changes separately for existing single-source drugs, existing drugs that faced competition, and new drugs that entered the market. Data analysis was performed from June to December 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: Part B drug spending by the fee-for-service Medicare program and beneficiaries, as well as use, defined as dosage units and beneficiaries using the drugs. Results: The study included 535 unique Part B drug products. From 2016 to 2020, 15 or fewer products comprised half of all Part B drug expenditures. The set of 7 drugs that comprised the top 25% of spending was very consistent over time, and all were biologics. Part B drug products that cost $1.85 or less per administration accounted for more than half of the doses administered in 2020. Spending on Part B drugs increased by $15 billion from 2016 to 2020. The entry of new, nonbiosimilar drugs during this period accounted for $12 billion of this increased spending (80%), while shifts in use and price increases among existing single-source brand drugs accounted for the remaining increase in spending. Part B spending decreased among the subset of existing drugs facing generic or biosimilar competition. Among single-source drugs on the market in 2016, the index that varied dosage units exceeded the index that varied price in all years, confirming that changes in use were associated more with spending growth for those drugs. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of Medicare Part B drug expenditures, spending was found to be concentrated among a small number of drugs. The entry of new products was a key factor associated with recent increases in Part B drug spending. These findings suggest that policies targeting top-selling drugs may have greater potential to curb Part B drug spending than those targeting price growth.

Budget Neutrality and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule Reimbursement Trends for Radiologists, 2005 to 2021.

PURPOSE: The Medicare program, by law, must remain budget neutral. Increases in volume or relative value units (RVUs) for individual services necessitate declines in either the conversion factor or assigned RVUs for other services for budget neutrality. This study aimed to assess the contribution of budget neutrality on reimbursement trends per Medicare fee-for-service beneficiary for services provided by radiologists. METHODS: The study used aggregated 100% of Medicare Part B claims from 2005 to 2021. We computed the percentage change in reimbursement per beneficiary, actual and inflation adjusted, to radiologists. These trends were then adjusted by separately holding constant RVUs per beneficiary and the conversion factor to demonstrate the impact of budget neutrality. RESULTS: Unadjusted reimbursement to radiologists per beneficiary increased 4.2% between 2005 and 2021, but when adjusted for inflation, it declined 24.9%. Over this period, the conversion factor declined 7.9%. Without this decline, the reimbursement per beneficiary would have been 9 percentage points higher in 2021 compared with actual. RVUs per beneficiary performed by radiologists increased 13.1%. Keeping RVUs per beneficiary at 2005 levels, reimbursement per beneficiary would have been 12.1 percentage points lower than observed in 2021. CONCLUSIONS: Given budget neutrality, a substantial decline has occurred in inflation-adjusted reimbursement to radiologists per Medicare beneficiary. Decreases due to both inflation and the decline in conversion factor are only partially offset by increased RVUs per beneficiary, meaning more services per patient with less overall pay, an equation likely to heighten access challenges for Medicare beneficiaries and shortages of radiologists.

Participation in a Medicare advanced primary care model and the delivery of high-value services.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether primary care providers' participation in the Comprehensive Primary Care Plus Initiative (CPC+) was associated with changes in their delivery of high-value services. DATA SOURCES: Medicare Physician & Other Practitioners public use files from 2013 to 2019, 2017 to 2019 Medicare Part B claims for a 5% random sample of Medicare Fee-for-Service (FFS) beneficiaries, the Area Health Resources File, the National Plan & Provider Enumeration System files, and public use datasets from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Physician Compare. STUDY DESIGN: We used a difference-in-difference approach with a propensity score-matched comparison group to estimate the association of CPC+ participation with the delivery of annual wellness visits (AWVs), advance care planning (ACP), flu shots, counseling to prevent tobacco use, and depression screening. These services are prominent examples of high-value services, providing benefits to patients at a reasonable cost. We examined both the likelihood of delivering these services within a year and the count of services delivered per 1000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries per year. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION METHODS: Secondary data are linked at the provider level. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: We find that CPC+ participation was associated with increases in the likelihood of delivering AWVs (13.03 percentage points by CPC+'s third year, p < 0.001) and the number of AWVs per 1000 Medicare FFS beneficiaries (44 more AWVs by CPC+'s third year, p < 0.001). We also find that CPC+ participation was associated with more flu shots per 1000 beneficiaries (52 more shots by CPC+'s third year, p < 0.001) but not with the likelihood of delivering flu shots. We did not find consistent evidence for the association between CPC+ participation and ACP services, counseling to prevent tobacco use, or depression screening. CONCLUSIONS: CPC+ participation was associated with increases in the delivery of AWVs and flu shots, but not other high-value services.

Estimating the Impact of the Inflation Reduction Act on the Out-of-Pocket Costs for Medicare Beneficiaries With Advanced Prostate Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Combination systemic therapy for advanced prostate cancer has reduced mortality, but high out-of-pocket costs impose financial barriers for patients. The Inflation Reduction Act's $2,000 out-of-pocket spending cap for Medicare's prescription drug benefit (Part D) can potentially lower out-of-pocket spending for beneficiaries starting in 2025. This study aims to compare out-of-pocket spending for commonly prescribed regimens for advanced prostate cancer before and after implementation of the Inflation Reduction Act. METHODS: Medication regimens constructed to treat metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer consisted of baseline androgen deprivation therapy with traditional chemotherapy, androgen receptor inhibitors, and androgen biosynthesis inhibitors. Using 2023 Medicare Part B prices and the Medicare Part D plan finder, we estimated annual out-of-pocket costs under current law and under the Inflation Reduction Act's redesigned standard Part D benefit. RESULTS: Under current law, out-of-pocket costs for Part D drugs ranged from $464 to $11,336 per year. Under the Inflation Reduction Act, annual out-of-pocket costs for 2 regimens remained unchanged: androgen deprivation therapy with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy with abiraterone and prednisone. However, out-of-pocket costs for regimens using branded novel hormonal therapy were significantly lower under the 2025 law with potential savings estimated to be $9,336 (79.2%) for apalutamide, $9,036 (78.7%) for enzalutamide, and $8,480 (76.5%) for docetaxel and darolutamide. CONCLUSIONS: The $2,000 spending cap introduced by the Inflation Reduction Act may significantly decrease out-of-pocket costs and reduce financial toxicity associated with advanced prostate cancer treatment, impacting an estimated 25,000 Medicare beneficiaries.

National Utilization of Glaucoma Laser and Surgical Management in Medicare Beneficiaries: Disparities and Accessibility.

PRCIS: In this population-based, cross-sectional study of Medicare beneficiaries, there were lower odds of national glaucoma surgery among ages older than 85, female sex, Hispanic ethnicity, and diabetic comorbidity. Glaucoma surgery rates were independent of ophthalmologist distribution. PURPOSE: With an increasing prevalence of glaucoma in the United States, it is crucial to elucidate surgical procedure accessibility to deliver quality care. The objective of this study was to estimate national access to surgical glaucoma care by (1) comparing diagnostic and surgical management Medicare insurance claims followed by (2) correlating Medicare treatment claims with regional ophthalmologist availability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cross-sectional study included Medicare claims from the 2017 Vision and Eye Health Surveillance System and workforce data from the 2017 Area Health Resource Files, both public domain databases. A total of 25,443,400 beneficiaries fully enrolled in Medicare Part B Fee-for-Service with glaucoma diagnosis claims were included. Rates of US MD ophthalmologists were determined by Area Health Resource Files distribution densities. Surgical glaucoma management rates included Medicare service utilization claims for drain, laser, and incisional glaucoma surgery. RESULTS: While Black, non-Hispanic Americans had the highest prevalence of glaucoma, Hispanic beneficiaries had the highest odds of surgery. Older age (85+ vs. 65-84 y; Odds Ratio [OR]=0.864; 95% Confidence Interval [CI], 0.854-0.874), female sex (OR=0.923; 95% CI, 0.914-0.932), and having diabetes (OR=0.944; 95% CI, 0.936-0.953) was associated with lower odds of having a surgical glaucoma intervention. Glaucoma surgery rates were not associated with ophthalmologist density by state. CONCLUSIONS: Glaucoma surgery utilization differences by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and systemic comorbidities warrant further investigation. Glaucoma surgery rates are independent of ophthalmologist distribution by state.