When medical students are autonomously motivated to mentor: a pilot study on confidence in clinical teaching and psychological well-being.

Introduction: Near peer mentorship (NPM) programs can help support medical students' well-being. Most studies, however, have not accounted for students' underlying motives to mentor, nor focused on clinical skills development and teaching. These limitations represent opportunities to better understand what motivates medical student mentors, and how to support their autonomous motivation, clinical development, and well-being. Methods: Informed by self-determination theory (SDT), we collected data from a group of medical student mentors involved in a NPM program at the University of Saskatchewan called PULSE. We then used correlation and regression to assess the relationship between students' autonomous motivation towards mentoring, perceived competence in teaching the clinical material, and psychological well-being. Results: In line with our hypotheses, autonomous motivation towards mentoring (identified motivation in particular) was associated with higher perceived competence in clinical teaching, which in turn was associated with greater psychological well-being. Conclusions: Why medical students choose to mentor in NPM programs appears to have important implications for their clinical confidence and overall well-being. Findings are discussed in terms of designing NPM programs that support student growth and wellness in Canadian medical education.

Introduction: Les programmes de mentorat par les pairs peuvent contribuer au bien-être des étudiants en médecine. Cependant, la plupart des études n'ont pas pris en compte les motivations sous-jacentes des étudiants à devenir mentor, ni ne se sont concentrées sur le développement des compétences cliniques et l'enseignement. Ces limites ouvrent des perspectives pour mieux comprendre ce qui motive les étudiants en médecine mentors, et comment soutenir leur motivation autonome, leur développement clinique et leur bien-être. Méthodes: En nous appuyant sur la théorie de l'autodétermination, nous avons recueilli des données auprès d'un groupe d'étudiants en médecine mentors participant à un programme de mentorat par les pairs à l'Université de la Saskatchewan appelé PULSE. Nous avons ensuite eu recours à la corrélation et la régression pour évaluer la relation entre la motivation autonome des étudiants envers le mentorat, leur perception de leur compétence dans l'enseignement clinique et leur bien-être psychologique. Résultats: Conformément à nos hypothèses, la motivation autonome envers le mentorat (la motivation identifiée en particulier) a été associée à une plus grande compétence perçue dans l'enseignement clinique, qui à son tour a été associée à un plus grand bien-être psychologique. Conclusions: Les raisons pour lesquelles les étudiants en médecine choisissent d'être mentors dans les programmes de mentorat par les pairs semblent avoir des implications importantes pour leur confiance en clinique et leur bien-être général. Les résultats sont discutés en termes de conception de programmes de mentorat par les pairs qui soutiennent la progression et le bien-être des étudiants dans le secteur de l'enseignement de la médecine au Canada.

Changing the Approach in Supporting and Advancing Underrepresented in Medicine (UIM) Medical Students.

Introduction: Research has shown the importance of diversity in improving patient care. Medical students from backgrounds underrepresented in medicine (UIM) face unique challenges, including minority tax, stereotype threat, and expectations to be the sole representative of their identity group. Mentors must be aware of these challenges and develop skills to address them. Methods: We designed a 90-minute workshop about the challenges UIM students encounter in medical school and best practices in mentorship. Target audience and facilitators were undergraduate medical educators. Three videos and questions for case-based facilitated small-group discussion with medical school faculty and administrators were included. Using a retrospective pre-post design, we elicited participants' confidence level in recognizing and addressing issues UIM students may experience and plans to apply skills gained in the workshop. Results: Workshop participants (N = 57) reported a mean increase in confidence rating of 20-26 points out of 100 for recognizing, identifying, and applying skills related to optimal UIM mentorship (mean confidence: 53-60 preworkshop, 79-81 postworkshop). Participants also reported a mean of 82 in readiness to apply skills learned. Participants rated the workshop a 4.6 in overall helpfulness on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = not helpful, 5 = extremely helpful). Discussion: Health care professionals working with UIM medical students have an essential role in mentorship and support. This workshop provides a structured forum to discuss challenges and build awareness, comfort, and skills regarding engaging in meaningful discussions about race and the experiences of medical students, even when identities are incongruent.

Dr. Carolyn Meltzer: Pioneer, innovator, mentor, and 2023 ACR Gold Medal winner.

Dr. Carolyn Meltzer is an extraordinary radiologist, researcher, mentor, and distinguished leader who deserves recognition for her immense impact on the discipline of radiology. This article serves to acknowledge and celebrate Dr. Meltzer for winning the 2023 American College of Radiology (ACR) Gold Medal. The ACR Gold Medal award is the highest honor awarded to distinguished radiologists with exceptional contributions to the field, and Dr. Meltzer is no exception. She is the 14th woman to win this prestigious award, compared to 191 male winners, although it began as an annual tradition in 1927. Throughout this piece, Dr. Meltzer discusses her journey to where she is today as the dean of Keck School of Medicine at USC, the guidance and development that lead her to this point and provides sound advice for those who seek to follow in her footsteps as a leader and mentor committed to seeking ways to advance and contribute immensely to the field of radiology.

"A clean slate": Insights for improving remediation from the perspectives of underperforming surgical trainees.

BACKGROUND: Remediation frameworks have centered around perspectives of educators. The aim of this study is to explore the insights proposed by surgical trainees to improve remediation processes. METHODS: This qualitative study used semi-structured interviews with 11 doctors who have experienced formal remediation as a surgical trainee. We used reflexive thematic analysis on transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Trainees recommended creating environments that safeguarded their well-being. Examples include trainee-led peer support groups and external mentors. Feedback conversations and remediation plans were flagged as needing improvement. Opportunities for forward planning for successful remediation were suggested including learning plans, program evaluation and aligning training program structure with expectations. CONCLUSIONS: These findings about trainees' insights on improving remediation highlighted the need for further emotional support for trainees. Supervisors need further support with feedback conversations and remediation plans. Actively seeking out trainee perspectives and integrating their recommendations when designing remediation processes should improve outcomes.

A Roadmap to Research Opportunities for Dermatology Residents.

In the increasingly competitive field of residency and fellowship training, research productivity has become a key differentiator for applicants. This heightened emphasis on scholarly activity has led some to describe the process as a "research arms race," with residents feeling pressured to boost their research output to stand out. This article explores the challenges dermatology residents face in conducting meaningful research across diverse program environments, emphasizing the crucial role of mentorship. It also highlights systematic reviews as a valuable and feasible option for residents seeking to contribute to the medical literature. A streamlined framework for conducting these reviews also is provided, offering a practical pathway to meaningful scholarly activity amid the demands of residency training and the competitive nature of specialty matching.

Needs and experiences of postgraduate nursing students in Nigeria during the COVID-19 pandemic.

AIM: To explore the experiences and needs of postgraduate nursing students within the Nigerian context. DESIGN: This qualitative study was conducted using a descriptive phenomenological approach. METHOD: Data were collected between February and April 2022 using a purposive sampling method and telephone semi-structured interviews. Colaizzi's method of Qualitative data Analysis was utilized. Twenty-two Nigerian postgraduate nursing students were interviewed. RESULTS: Three themes emerged: challenges of Nigerian postgraduate students before the pandemic, the impact of the pandemic on postgraduate education, and innovations to improve postgraduate education in Nigeria. The challenges include the burden of physical lectures, lack of infrastructure, and poor mentorship of postgraduate nursing students. The impact of the pandemic on postgraduate education includes abrupt disruption of the academic program, a prolonged academic calendar, and a communication gap between students and their research supervisors. Innovations to improve postgraduate nursing education in Nigeria also include adoption and sustainability of e-learning, upgrading post-basic to postgraduate nursing programmes, proper structuring of postgraduate nursing education, commencement of postgraduate nursing programmes in more universities and provision of financial aid for students. Our primary finding is that funding, mentorship and infrastructure were issues peculiar to all the respondents. CONCLUSION: This study concludes that efforts should be made to maintain a seamless educational program by ensuring an uninterrupted flow of learning through virtual means, thereby enhancing effective teaching and learning. IMPLICATIONS: Graduate nursing studies is one of the suggested solutions in the WHO strategic direction for nursing and midwifery globally to achieve Universal Health Coverage . The reason is that nurses can practice with more and better skills in any work setting, thus improving the quality of health care services. Our study provides insights into the experiences of postgraduate students and how these could discourage other nurses who might have thought about furthering their studies. Efforts should be made to provide all the support that these students need, using evidence from this study and similar studies to ensure they have a good learning experience and others can be motivated to learn at the graduate level as well. This will increase the proportion of nurses and midwives honed with better skills to provide more standard quality services that will improve patient care outcomes.

Peer mentorship and professional identity formation: an ecological systems perspective.

BACKGROUND: Mentoring can help shape how medical students think, feel, and act as physicians. Yet, the mechanism in which it influences this process of professional identity formation (PIF) remains poorly understood. Through the lens of the ecological systems theory, this study explores the interconnected and dynamic system of mentoring relationships and resources that support professional development and growth within the Palliative Medicine Initiative (PMI), a structured research peer mentoring program. METHODS: A secondary analysis of transcripts of semi-structured interviews with peer mentors and mentees and a review of their mentoring diaries was conducted to explore the impact of participation in a longitudinal peer mentoring program on both mentees and peer mentors on their personal and professional development through the lens of the mentoring ecosystem model. The Systematic Evidence-Based Approach was adapted to analyze the data via content and thematic analysis. RESULTS: Eighteen mentees and peer mentors participated and described a supportive community of practice within the research program, with discrete micro-, meso-, and macro-environments that are dynamic, reflexive, and interconnected to form a mentoring ecosystem. Within this ecosystem, reflection is fostered, and identity work is done-ultimately shaping and refining self-concepts of personhood and identity. CONCLUSION: This study underscores the nuances and complexities of mentorship and supports the role of the mentoring ecosystem in PIF. A deeper understanding of the multiple factors that converge to facilitate the professional development of mentees can help educators develop and implement structured peer mentorship programs that better support reflective practice and identity work.

Enhancing Student Success: Implementing Mentoring Programs in Academic Settings: Focus on the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis.

In order to improve the learning outcomes, skills, sense of belonging and well-being of their students, faculties around the world have chosen to implement mentoring programs for their learners. Given the complexity of implementing this approach, our objectives in this review are, on the one hand, to discuss and support the principles and recommendations of a mentoring project in an academic setting and, on the other hand, to present the vision of the Faculty of Medicine of Tunis regarding this mentoring approach.

Cultivating Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Pulmonary and Critical Care Training: A Path Toward Health Care Excellence.

Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine (PCCM) fellowship training faces increasing competition but lacks diversity, hindering health care excellence. Despite a growing interest in the field, programs lack diverse representation. Addressing this issue is crucial to combat health disparities and bias, benefiting trainees, practitioners, and patients. Sustainable solutions are vital for achieving diversity, equity, and inclusion in PCCM. Strategies for achieving equity among training programs include adopting inclusive recruitment practices, recognizing differential attainment, addressing bias, fostering an equitable academic climate, and implementing multifaceted strategic processes to enhance diversity in mentorship including recognition and compensation for diversity and equity work.

Cross-National Variations in Scientific Ethics: Exploring Ethical Perspectives Among Scientists in China, the US, and the UK.

This research explores the perspectives of academic physicists from three national contexts concerning their roles and responsibilities within the realm of science. Using a dataset comprised of 211 interviews with scientists working in China, the United States, and the United Kingdom, the study seeks to explain whether and in what manner physicists conceptualize scientific ethics within a global or national framework. The empirical findings bring to light disparities across nations in the physicists' perceptions of what constitutes responsible mentorship and engagement in public service. These cross-national variations underscore the moral agency of physicists as they navigate the ethical standards embraced by the global scientific community vis-à-vis those that are specific to their respective national contexts. The study's empirical insights may carry significant implications for both policymakers and ethicists, underscoring the imperative of soliciting and acknowledging the perspectives of academic scientists working and living in disparate national contexts when formulating comprehensive science ethics frameworks. Such inclusive and context-aware approaches to shaping ethics in science can contribute to the cultivation of a more robust and universally relevant ethical foundation for the scientific community.

Defining sense of belonging in nursing - An evolutionary concept analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this analysis is to develop the concept of sense of belonging in nursing. The secondary purpose is to identify the antithesis or direct opposite beyond the negative consequences related to a lack of belonging in nursing. DESIGN: Rodgers' evolutionary method guided the analysis and advancement of sense of belonging in nursing. DATA SOURCES: Following PRISMA guidelines, peer-reviewed English articles and dissertations were reviewed from PubMed, ERIC, CINAHL, and PsychINFO. Forty-seven articles describing sense of belonging in the nursing profession, both academic and workforce, were included. REVIEW METHODS: Inductive thematic analysis was used to determine recurring themes of the antecedents, attributes, consequences, and antithesis of belonging in nursing. RESULTS: A welcoming, positive atmosphere encouraging a culture of mentorship is key to developing an environment of belonging. The attributes of belonging include being trusted, valued, and an accepted part of the team, and encouraging a connection to the community. Nurses and nursing students have improved confidence, self-esteem, and motivation to learn when a sense of belonging is present. They feel supported and respected in the environment. However, historically minoritized students and nurses report discrimination, bias, and condescension resulting in feeling invisible, isolated, excluded, and neglected. Nurses and nursing students feel invisible, isolated, excluded, and neglected without a sense of belonging. CONCLUSION: Developing a sense of belonging in nurses and nursing students is critical to our profession. Further research is essential to develop interventions and strategies for cultivating a sense of belonging in nursing.

Institutional factors that affect faculty mentoring in academic nursing programs.

BACKGROUND: Mentoring in academic nursing facilitates the acclimation of nurse faculty into academia, supports career development, and improves faculty satisfaction and retention. While studies have examined the characteristics of effective mentors, few have examined institutional influences on academic mentoring for faculty. PURPOSE: To identify institutional factors that support or hinder faculty-to-faculty academic mentoring from the perspectives of experienced nurse faculty mentors. METHOD: A qualitative descriptive approach was used to identify institutional factors that impact academic mentoring. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with experienced nurse faculty (n = 24) about their mentoring experiences. Remarks related to institutional factors were analyzed using conventional content analysis. RESULTS: Five institutional factors that supported mentoring were identified: (1) support of unit leaders, (2) established processes and policies, (3) mentoring development opportunities, (4) faculty-to-faculty support, and (5) faculty rewards. Six institutional factors that hindered mentoring were identified: (1) lack of support of unit leaders, (2) limited mentoring development opportunities, (3) heavy workloads that restrict mentoring, (4) limited pool of mentors, (5) inadequate faculty rewards for mentoring, and (6) limited oversight of faculty mentoring. CONCLUSION: The identification of institutional factors that support or hinder mentoring can inform academic leaders and program administrators in their efforts to strengthen mentoring.

Gender and Race/Ethnicity dynamics in anesthesiology mentorship: results of a European survey.

BACKGROUND: Mentorship is crucial to career advancement, medical education, and psychosocial support, especially for women and minorities. Although anesthesia mentoring programs have shown promise, there are no survey data regarding mentor-mentee relationship dynamics. This study aimed to explore the dynamics of the anesthesia mentor/mentee relationship. METHODS: A open cross-sectional web-based survey was distributed by the European Society of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care and European Society of Regional Anesthesia to European anesthesiologists. Participation was anonymous and consent was obtained. The study evaluated responses relating to preferences, facilitators, and barriers to mentorship relationships along with sociodemographic information. RESULTS: In total, 543 anesthesiologists responded to the survey, and 406 (111 mentees, 49 mentors, 193 both, 53 neither) responded to questions regarding mentorship. 184 anesthesiologists identified as woman and 22 as other genders (non-binary, transgender, gender-fluid, and self-described gender). Moreover, 250 anesthesiologists identified as white. Both mentors and mentees indicated that personal compatibility was the most important factor for successful mentorship. Barriers to mentorship included time consumption and perceived lack of interest from the mentor and mentee. Both mentors and mentees benefited from this relationship. The former reported feeling helpful, and the latter supported the development of clinical skills. The mentors indicated that their participation was important for protecting against burnout/exhaustion and impostor syndrome. Participants reported a preference for mentorship programs organized at the departmental level, offered at the start of the anesthesiology education curricula. Women were more likely to feel a 'lack of interest' in mentoring them as a barrier (OR = 2.49, P = 0.033). Gender was a barrier for mentors of other genders (OR = 23.9, P = 0.0027) and ethnicity (OR = 48.0, P = 0.0023). White mentees found gender (OR = 0.14, P = 0.021) and ethnicity (OR = 0.11, P = 0.048) to be less important barriers to successful mentorship relationship. CONCLUSION: When possible, programs should prioritize matching mentors and mentees based on personal compatibility and experience in the mentee's area of interest. Addressing the perceived lack of interest in mentoring is essential for promoting diversity, equality, and inclusion within anesthesiology, as well as and uplifting women and minorities. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05968339, First posted (01/08/2023).

Avoiding common pitfalls in mixed methods research?

This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors focus on how to help mentees take an analytic approach to improve their mixed methods work. Mixed methods research has increased in popularity and with that comes both strengths and weaknesses in these studies. We suggest key elements to look for when reading a mixed methods research paper. We also provide guidance around weaknesses we have noticed in reporting.

Utilizing mentorship education to promote a culturally responsive research training environment in the biomedical sciences.

There is an urgent and compelling need for systemic change to achieve diversity and inclusion goals in the biomedical sciences. Because faculty hold great influence in shaping research training environments, faculty development is a key aspect in building institutional capacity to create climates in which persons excluded because of their ethnicity or race (PEERs) can succeed. We present a mixed methods case study of one institution's efforts to improve mentorship of PEER doctoral students through mentorship education workshops for faculty. These workshops were one strategy among others intended to improve graduate trainees' experiences, and positively affect institutional climate with respect to racial and ethnic diversity. Surveys of 108 faculty mentors revealed that about 80% overall agreed or strongly agreed with the value of culturally responsive mentoring behaviors but about 63% overall agreed or strongly agreed that they were confident in their ability to enact those behaviors. Through a series of three focus groups, PEER doctoral students reported that they noticed mentors' efforts to address cultural diversity matters and identified some guidance for how to approach such topics. We discuss future directions and implications for using mentorship education to activate systemic change toward inclusive research training environments and promoting the value of mentorship within institutions.