Clinical management of nonobstructive azoospermia: An update.

Approximately 1% of the general male population has azoospermia, and nonobstructive azoospermia accounts for the majority of cases. The causes vary widely, including chromosomal and genetic abnormalities, varicocele, drug-induced causes, and gonadotropin deficiency; however, the cause is often unknown. In azoospermia caused by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism, gonadotropin replacement therapy can be expected to produce sperm in the ejaculate. In some cases, upfront varicocelectomy for nonobstructive azoospermia with varicocele may result in the appearance of ejaculated spermatozoa; however, the appropriate indication should be selected. Each guideline recommends microdissection testicular sperm extraction for nonobstructive azoospermia in terms of successful sperm retrieval and avoidance of complications. Sperm retrieval rates generally ranged from 20% to 70% but vary depending on the causative disease. Various attempts have been made to predict sperm retrieval and improve sperm retrieval rates; however, the evidence is insufficient. Further evidence accumulation is needed for salvage treatment in cases of failed sperm retrieval. In Japan, there is inadequate provision on the right to know the origin of children born from artificial insemination of donated sperm and the rights of sperm donors, as well as information on unrelated family members, and the development of these systems is challenging. In the future, it is hoped that the pathogenesis of nonobstructive azoospermia with an unknown cause will be elucidated and that technology for omics technologies, human spermatogenesis using pluripotent cells, and organ culture methods will be developed.

Modern surgical treatment of azoospermia.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To review noteworthy research from the last 2 years on surgical management of azoospermia. RECENT FINDINGS: The recommended treatments for nonobstructive and obstructive azoospermia have not appreciably changed. However, recent level-1 evidence has reinforced superiority of micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction over sperm aspiration in men with nonobstructive azoospermia, and several studies have identified genetic and other clinical factors that may aid in selecting candidates for testicular sperm extraction. Machine learning technology has shown promise as a decision support system for patient selection prior to sperm retrieval as well a tool to aid in sperm identification from testis tissue. SUMMARY: Most men with obstructive azoospermia who desire fertility can be offered either surgical reconstruction or sperm retrieval. For men with nonobstructive azoospermia, sperm retrieval with microdissection testicular sperm extraction remains the gold standard treatment. Uncovering more genetic causes of nonobstructive azoospermia may aid in properly counseling and selecting patients for microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Neural networks and deep learning may have a future role in patient selection for surgical sperm retrieval and postprocedural sperm identification.

Outcomes and affecting factors for ICSI and microTESE treatments in nonobstructive azoospermia patients with different etiologies: A retrospective analysis.

Introduction: Nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) is a common and severe form of male infertility. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) combined with intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) is an optimal treatment for men with NOA. However, the outcomes and affecting factors of ICSI for NOA patients with different etiologies receiving microTESE treatment are still unclear. Methods: A total of 335 NOA patients undergoing microTESE from January 2017 to December 2021 were included in this retrospective analysis. The patients were divided into five groups (idiopathic, Klinefelter syndrome (KS), Y chromosome microdeletions (YCMDs), cryptorchidism and mumps orchitis) according to the etiologies. The clinical characteristics and outcomes of microTESE and ICSI were collected and comparisons were performed between clinical characteristics of patients who had successful sperm retrieval (SSR) and sperm retrieval failure (SRF). In addition, relationships between clinical characteristics and rates of SSR were explored by Kendall correlation analysis. Results: The overall SSR rate was 40.90%. SSR rate of the idiopathic group (31.22%) was the lowest and was much lower than that of other groups (KS: 48.65%, 28/58; YCMDs: 60.87%; cryptorchidism: 80.95%; mumps orchitis: 75.00%). The overall fertilization rate was 72.26%. No group differences were found among five groups (idiopathic: 73.91%; KS: 71.43%; YCMDs: 64.29%; cryptorchidism: 70.59%; mumps orchitis: 77.78%). The overall clinical pregnancy rate was 66.67%. No group differences were found among five groups (idiopathic: 68.63%; KS: 65.00%; YCMDs: 44.44%; cryptorchidism: 66.67%; mumps orchitis: 85.71%). The overall live birth rate was 66.67%. No group differences were found among five groups (idiopathic: 71.43%; KS: 53.85%; YCMDs: 50.00%; cryptorchidism: 75.00%; mumps orchitis: 66.67%). For SSR patients, the average age was significantly lower in the idiopathic group, while the average testicular volume was significantly greater in the cryptorchidism and mumps orchitis groups. However, no significant differences were found in the level of follicle stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH) and testosterone (T) between patients who had SSR and SRF. In addition, negative relationships were found between age and rates of SSR in idiopathic NOA patients while positive relationships were found between testis volume and rates of SSR in patients with cryptorchidism and mumps orchitis. Conclusion: Patients with idiopathic NOA had lowest SSR. In addition, the age in idiopathic NOA patients was a predictor for SSR while testicular volume in NOA patients with cryptorchidism and mumps orchitis was a predictor for SSR. However, the relationships between clinical characteristics and clinical outcomes in NOA patients were preliminary, and further validation needed to be carried out in a larger sample to increase statistical capacity before a definitive conclusion could be drawn.

Testosterone levels among non-obstructive azoospermic patients 2 years after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction: a nested case-cohort study.

PURPOSE: To define the risk of hypogonadism following microdissection testicular sperm extraction in cases of non-obstructive azoospermia. While sperm retrieval by open testicular sperm extraction can be associated with an increased risk of hypogonadism, there is limited data addressing which procedures and which patients harbor the greatest risk. METHODS: We report on a community-acquired, nested, case-cohort of non-obstructive azoospermic patients referred to one clinic after failed bilateral microdissection testicular sperm extraction. Patients were health-matched (1:2) to surgically naïve controls and divided into 2 cohorts based on risk factors for hypogonadism. Among microdissection patients, we compared total testosterone and gonadotropin levels before and > 6 months after surgery. Biochemical hypogonadism was defined as a total serum testosterone level ≤ 300 ng/dL. Hormone levels were compared to risk-matched controls. Comparative statistics were used to assess hormone levels within and between cohorts. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in baseline testosterone levels between microdissection patients (n = 26) and risk-matched controls (n = 52). At a mean of 26 months (range 6.2-112.8) post-procedure, mean testosterone levels decreased significantly (73 ng/dL or 16%; CI - 27, - 166; p < 0.01, paired t-test). Among microdissection patients with baseline testosterone > 300 ng/dL, 8/22 (36%) experienced hypogonadism post-procedure. There was a corresponding increase in follicle stimulating hormone (p = 0.05) and a trending increase in luteinizing hormones (p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: A durable decrease in testosterone levels occurs after failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction regardless of baseline risk of hypogonadism. In addition, a significant proportion of eugonadal patients will become hypogonadal after failed testicular microdissection procedures.

Microdissection testicular sperm extraction: preoperative patient optimization, surgical technique, and tissue processing.

Infertility due to nonobstructive azoospermia is treatable with the use of testicular sperm extraction and IVF. The optimal approach for sperm retrieval is microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). This systematic review summarizes and evaluates the literature pertaining to patient optimization before mTESE, mTESE technique, and post-mTESE testicular tissue processing. Preoperative patient optimization has been assessed in terms of adjuvant hormone therapy and varicocele repair. Limited data are available for adjuvant medical therapy, and although also limited, data for varicocele repair support increased sperm retrieval, pregnancy, and return of sperm to the ejaculate. Post-mTESE tissue processing has few comparative studies; however, most studies support the combination of mechanical mincing and use of type 4 collagenase for tissue disintegration along with pentoxifylline to assist in identifying motile and viable spermatozoa for intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

[Microdissection testicular sperm extraction for patients with non-mosaic Klinefelter's syndrome: An update].

Klinefelter's syndrome (KS) is a most frequent sex chromosomal disorder in males, which is characterized by hypogonadism and infertility. The development of assisted reproductive technology has made it possible for KS males to father children. Microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) is widely considered to be the best method for sperm retrieval in KS patients. This article presents an overview on mTESE for men with non-mosaic KS in the aspects of its predictors, sperm retrieval rate, operation procedure, preoperative hormonal therapy, and postoperative complications and testosterone reduction.

Standard Lumbar Discectomy Versus Microdiscectomy - Differences in Clinical Outcome and Reoperation Rate.

Microdiscectomy (MD) is accepted nowadays as the operative method of choice for lumbar disc herniation, but it is not rare for neurosurgeons to opt for standard discectomy (SD), which does not entail the use of operating microscope. In our study, differences in disc herniation recurrence and clinical outcome of surgical treatment of lumbar disc herniation with and without the use of operating microscope were assessed. Our study included 167 patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery during a three-year period (SD, n=111 and MD, n=56). Clinical outcome assessments were recorded by patients via questionnaire forms filled out by patients at three time points. Operation duration, length of hospital stay and revision surgeries were also recorded. According to study results, after one-year follow up there was no statistically significant difference between the SD and MD groups in functional outcome. However, we recorded a statistically significant difference in leg pain reduction in favor of the MD group. According to the frequency of reoperations with the mean follow up period of 33.4 months, there was a statistically significant difference in favor of the MD group (SD 6.3% vs. MD 3.2%). There appears to be no particular advantage of either technique in terms of functional outcome since both result in good overall outcome. However, we choose MD over SD because it includes significantly lower recurrent disc herniation rate and higher reduction of leg pain.

Phacoemulsification in posterior polar cataract.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results and complications of phacoemulsification surgery in eyes with posterior polar cataracts and compare the techniques of viscodissection and hydrodissection. METHODS: The medical records of 29 consecutive patients (16 males, 13 females) with posterior polar cataracts (44 eyes) who had undergone cataract surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the technique used; viscodissection was applied to the experimental group (group 1) and hydrodissection to the control group (group 2). RESULTS: The postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.19 ± 0.22 logMAR (mean ± standard deviation) (range 0.00-0.70) in group 1 and 0.25 ± 0.18 logMAR (range 0.00-0.70) in group 2. Although the mean postoperative BCVA in group 1 was greater than that in group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.165). The mean postoperative BCVA was significantly greater than the mean preoperative BCVA in both groups (p=0.00). Intraoperatively, posterior capsular rupture occurred during the removal of the cortex in three eyes (13%) of group 1 patients, with vitreous loss and anterior vitrectomy in one eye only. In group 2, six eyes (28.5%) presented posterior capsular rupture, and anterior vitrectomy was performed because of vitreous loss in three eyes. Although the percentage of posterior capsular rupture was greater in group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.207). CONCLUSIONS: Complications in posterior polar cataract surgeries can be overcome by being careful throughout the surgery and using proper techniques. Viscodissection may be better for avoiding posterior capsular rupture than hydrodissection.

Phacoemulsification in posterior polar cataract / Facoemulsificação na catarata polar posterior

ABSTRACT Purpose: To evaluate the results and complications of phacoemulsification surgery in eyes with posterior polar cataracts and compare the techniques of viscodissection and hydrodissection. Methods: The medical records of 29 consecutive patients (16 males, 13 females) with posterior polar cataracts (44 eyes) who had undergone cataract surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the technique used; viscodissection was applied to the experimental group (group 1) and hydrodissection to the control group (group 2). Results: The postoperative best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.19 ± 0.22 logMAR (mean ± standard deviation) (range 0.00-0.70) in group 1 and 0.25 ± 0.18 logMAR (range 0.00-0.70) in group 2. Although the mean postoperative BCVA in group 1 was greater than that in group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.165). The mean postoperative BCVA was significantly greater than the mean preoperative BCVA in both groups (p=0.00). Intraoperatively, posterior capsular rupture occurred during the removal of the cortex in three eyes (13%) of group 1 patients, with vitreous loss and anterior vitrectomy in one eye only. In group 2, six eyes (28.5%) presented posterior capsular rupture, and anterior vitrectomy was performed because of vitreous loss in three eyes. Although the percentage of posterior capsular rupture was greater in group 2, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.207). Conclusions: Complications in posterior polar cataract surgeries can be overcome by being careful throughout the surgery and using proper techniques. Viscodissection may be better for avoiding posterior capsular rupture than hydrodissection.

RESUMO Objetivo: Avaliar os resultados e complicações da cirurgia de facoemulsificação em olhos com catarata polar posterior e comparar as técnicas de viscodissecção e hidrodissecção. Métodos: Os prontuários de 29 pacientes consecutivos (16 homens, 13 mulheres) com posterior cataratas polares (44 olhos), que haviam sido submetidos a cirurgia de catarata foram analisados retrospectivamente. Os pacientes foram divididos em dois grupos de acordo com a técnica utilizada; viscodissecção foi aplicada ao grupo experimental (grupo 1) e hidrodissecção para o grupo de controle (grupo 2). Resultados: No pós-operatório, a melhor acuidade visual corrigida (BCVA) foi 0,19 ± 0,22 logMAR (média ± desvio padrão) (variação 0,00-0,70) no grupo 1 e 0,25 ± 0,18 (0,00-0,70) logMAR no grupo 2. Embora a média da BCVA pós-operatória do grupo 1 tenha sido maior do que a do grupo 2, a diferença não foi estatisticamente significativa (p=0,165). A melhor acuidade visual corrigida pós-operatória foi significativamente melhor do que no pré-operatório, em ambos os grupos (p=0,00). No grupo 1, houve ruptura capsular posterior durante a remoção do córtex em três olhos (13%); houve perda vítrea e necessidade de vitrectomia anterior mas apenas em destes olhos. No grupo 2, a ruptura da cápsula posterior ocorreu em seis olhos (28,5%); vitrectomia anterior foi necessária após a perda vítrea em três destes olhos. Embora a porcentagem de ruptura da cápsula posterior tenha sido maior no grupo 2, a diferença não foi estatisticamente significativa (p=0,207). Conclusões: As complicações em cirurgias de catarata polar posterior podem ser superadas com cautela durante toda a cirurgia e usando técnicas adequadas. Viscodissecção é melhor para evitar a posterior ruptura capsular do que hidrodissecção.

Scoliosis may increase the risk of recurrence of lumbar disc herniation after microdiscectomy.

OBJECT: The aim of this paper was to investigate the risk of recurrence of lumbar disc herniation (LDH) in patients with scoliosis who underwent microdiscectomy. METHODS: A series of consecutive patients who underwent microdiscectomy for LDH was retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were young adults younger than 40 years who received microdiscectomy for symptomatic 1-level LDH. An exclusion criterion was any previous spinal surgery, including fusion or correction of scoliosis. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with scoliosis and those without scoliosis. The demographic data in the 2 groups were similar. All medical records and clinical and radiological evaluations were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients who underwent 1-level microdiscectomy for LDH were analyzed. During the mean follow-up of 24.6 months, 6 patients (10.3%) experienced a recurrence of LDH with variable symptoms. The recurrence rate was significantly higher among the scoliosis group than the nonscoliosis group (33.3% vs. 2.3%, p = 0.001). Furthermore, the recurrence-free interval in the scoliosis group was short. CONCLUSIONS: Young adults (< 40 years) with uncorrected scoliosis are at higher risk of recurrent LDH after microdiscectomy.

[Application of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in non-obstructive azoospermia].

The development of testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) has made it possible for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia to have their own children. However, sperm retrieval by conventional TESE succeeds but in a subset of patients and, therefore, how to improve the success rate of sperm retrieval is becoming a focus of research. Recent studies suggest that microdissection TESE, although with its limitations, has obvious advantages over traditional sperm retrieval methods. This article presents an overview on the characteristics, predictive factors, sperm retrieval rate, post-operative complications, and improvement of microdissection TESE.

Lumbar Endoscopic Microdiscectomy: Where Are We Now? An Updated Literature Review Focused on Clinical Outcome, Complications, and Rate of Recurrence.

Endoscopic disc surgery (EDS) for lumbar spine disc herniation is a well-known but developing field, which is increasingly spreading in the last few years. Rate of recurrence/residual, complications, and outcomes, in comparison with standard microdiscectomy (MD), is still debated and need further data. We performed an extensive review based on the last 6 years of surgical series, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses reported in international, English-written literature. Articles regarding patients treated through endoscopic transforaminal or interlaminar approaches for microdiscectomy (MD) were included in the present review. Papers focused on endoscopic surgery for other spinal diseases were not included. From July 2009 to July 2015, we identified 51 surgical series, 5 systematic reviews, and one meta-analysis reported. In lumbar EDS, rate of complications, length of hospital staying, return to daily activities, and overall patients' satisfaction seem comparable to standard MD. Rate of recurrence/residual seems higher in EDS, although data are nonhomogeneous among different series. Surgical indication and experience of the performing surgeon are crucial factors affecting the outcome. There is growing but still weak evidence that lumbar EDS is a valid and safe alternative to standard open microdiscectomy. Statistically reliable data obtained from randomized controlled trials (better if multicentric) are desirable to further confirm these results.

Microvascular decompression surgery: surgical principles and technical nuances based on 4000 cases.

BACKGROUND: As an etiological treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN) and hemifacial spasm (HFS), microvascular decompression (MVD) has been popularized around the world. However, as a functional operation in the cerebellopontine angle (CPA), this process can be risky and the postoperative outcomes might not be good enough sometimes. OBJECTIVE: In order to obtain a better result with less complication, this surgery should be further addressed. METHODS: With experience of more than 4000 MVDs, we have gained knowledge about the operative technique. Through abundant intraoperative photos, each step of the procedure was demonstrated in detail and the surgical strategy was focused. RESULTS: The principle of MVD is to separate the nerve-vessel confliction rather than isolate it with prostheses. A prompt identification of the conflict site is important, which hinges on a good exposure. A satisfactory working space can be established by an appropriate positioning of the patient's head and a proper craniectomy as well as a rational approach. A sharp dissection of arachnoids leads to a maximal visualization of the entire intracranial course of the nerve root. All the vessels contacting the trigeminal or facial nerve should be treated. Intraoperative electrophysiological mentoring is helpful to distinguish the offending artery for hemifacial cases. CONCLUSION: MVD is an effective treatment for the patient with TN or HFS. Immediate relief can be achieved by an experienced neurosurgeon with good knowledge of regional anatomy. A safe surgery is the tenet of MVD, and accordingly, no single step of the procedure should be ignored.

Blunt microdissection for endovascular treatment of infrainguinal chronic total occlusions.

PURPOSE: To present a systematic safety evaluation of the CrossBoss blunt microdissection catheter for crossing peripheral chronic total occlusions (CTOs). METHODS: Between July 2010 and July 2011, 15 patients (all men; mean age 60.7±9.1 years) underwent endovascular treatment of 17 infrainguinal CTOs that were resistant to guidewire passage, so the blunt microdissection catheter was employed to recanalize the artery. Fourteen lesions were de novo and 3 were in-stent restenoses. Sixteen lesions were in the superficial femoral artery; 8 of 17 CTOs were TASC II type D. Extensive calcification was present in 12 lesions. Mean lesion length was 182.9±66.2 mm (range 57-296). RESULTS: Procedural success was 100% and successful crossing without the use of a re-entry device (technical success) was achieved in 15 cases. Twelve lesions were stented. Average fluoroscopy time was 36.5±21.2 minutes (143.8±76.9 Gy*cm (2) radiaton dose area product), during which a mean 172.1±62.2 mL of iodinated contrast were used. Two patients had access site hematomas that were treated conservatively, and there was no perforation, distal embolization, amputation, or need for urgent revascularization. During the mean follow-up of 11.4±0.1 months, 1 patient died, and none required an amputation or surgical revascularization. There was a significant improvement in ankle-brachial index (0.6±0.1 to 0.8±0.2, p=0.001) and symptoms as assessed by Rutherford class at 1 year. Four of 17 limbs required secondary revascularization procedures within 1 year. CONCLUSION: The CrossBoss blunt microdissection catheter facilitated successful crossing of CTOs in patients with infrainguinal lesions following unsuccessful guidewire crossing, with an acceptably low rate of periprocedural complications and significant improvement in symptoms.

Anatomic renal artery branch microdissection to facilitate zero-ischemia partial nephrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted and laparoscopic partial nephrectomies (PNs) for medial tumors are technically challenging even with the hilum clamped and, until now, were impossible to perform with the hilum unclamped. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate whether targeted vascular microdissection (VMD) of renal artery branches allows zero-ischemia PN to be performed even for challenging medial tumors. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective cohort evaluation of 44 patients with renal masses who underwent robot-assisted or laparoscopic zero-ischemia PN either with anatomic VMD (group 1; n=22) or without anatomic VMD (group 2; n=22) performed by a single surgeon from April 2010 to January 2011. INTERVENTION: Zero-ischemia PN with VMD incorporates four maneuvers: (1) preoperative computed tomographic reconstruction of renal arterial branch anatomy, (2) anatomic dissection of targeted, tumor-specific tertiary or higher-order renal arterial branches, (3) neurosurgical aneurysm microsurgical bulldog clamp(s) for superselective tumor devascularization, and (4) transient, controlled reduction of blood pressure, if necessary. MEASUREMENTS: Baseline, perioperative, and postoperative data were collected prospectively. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Group 1 tumors were larger (4.3 vs 2.6 cm; p=0.011), were more often hilar (41% vs 9%; p=0.09), were medial (59% and 23%; p=0.017), were closer to the hilum (1.46 vs 3.26 cm; p=0.0002), and had a lower C index score (2.1 vs 3.9; p=0.004) and higher RENAL nephrometry scores (7.7 vs 6.2; p=0.013). Despite greater complexity, no group 1 tumor required hilar clamping, and perioperative outcomes were similar to those of group 2: operating room time (4.7 and 4.1h), median blood loss (200 and 100ml), surgical margins for cancer (all negative), major complications (0% and 9%), and minor complications (18% and 14%). The median serum creatinine level was similar 2 mo postoperatively (1.2 and 1.3mg/dl). The study was limited by the relatively small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: Anatomic targeted dissection and superselective control of tumor-specific renal arterial branches facilitate zero-ischemia PN. Even challenging medial and hilar tumors can be excised without hilar clamping. Global surgical renal ischemia has been eliminated for most patients undergoing PN at our institution.

The value of testicular 'mapping' in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

As the field of assisted reproduction has advanced, many previously untreatable men are now biological fathers. Although finding sperm in men with obstructive azoospermia is not difficult, locating and retrieving spermatozoa in men with non-obstructive azoospermia remains a clinical challenge, largely because sperm production in these men can be patchy or focal in nature. In response to this challenge, strategies such as fine-needle aspiration (FNA) mapping have been developed to find spermatozoa. This review discusses the history, evolution and current clinical utility and findings with FNA mapping for male infertility). Review of the current literature in the English language on FNA (diagnostic or therapeutic) with a keyword focuses on sperm detection, retrieval, safety and complications. FNA was described in human medicine over 100 years ago. Testis FNA was described 45 years ago and FNA 'mapping' of spermatozoa was described in 1997. This comparative review of the literature on sperm detection and complication rates with FNA and open testis biopsy or microdissection procedures suggests that FNA is highly informative, minimally invasive and is associated with fewer complications than other commonly used approaches to sperm detection in non-obstructive azoospermic patients. FNA mapping has gained considerable traction as an informative, 'testis sparing' technique for sperm detection in non-obstructive azoospermia. With knowledge of sperm presence and location prior to sperm retrieval, FNA maps can help clinicians tailor sperm retrieval to optimize time, effort and extent of procedures needed to procure spermatozoa in these difficult cases.