Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 274
Filter
1.
Sci Rep ; 13(1): 568, 2023 01 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36631508

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to conduct a comprehensive review with meta-analysis to determine the effects of the dose-response relationship between monensin supplementation and dairy cow performance and milk composition. Results from 566 full-text articles and 48 articles with 52 studies were meta-analyzed for pooled estimates. Monensin supplementation up to 23 ppm increased milk production, with the optimal dose being 12.6 ppm. Monensin supplementation at doses ranging from 16 to 96 ppm increased milk production in the prepartum phase (- 28 to 0 day relative to calving). From 60 to 150 DIM, monensin supplementation up to 21 ppm had a significant positive effect on this outcome, while supplementation in the 37 to 96 ppm range caused a decrease in this variable. At 0 to 60 and > 150 DIM, monensin supplementation had no effect on milk yield. At dosages of 22 to 96 ppm, 12 to 36 ppm, and below 58 ppm and 35 ppm, respectively, monensin supplementation resulted in significant decreases in dry matter intake (DMI), milk protein percentage, milk fat percentage, and milk fat yield. Overall, based on the results of this meta-analysis and considering all variables, the recommended optimal dose of monensin could be about 16 ppm.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Lactation , Milk , Monensin , Animals , Cattle , Female , Diet/veterinary , Lactation/drug effects , Milk/chemistry , Milk Proteins/analysis , Monensin/administration & dosage , Monensin/pharmacology , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Fats/analysis
2.
Vet J ; 272: 105659, 2021 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33941330

ABSTRACT

Additives used to improve feed efficiency of beef cattle on high-grain diets requires products that not only increase animal performance but also provide food safety for consumers. Since phytogenic additives such as essential oils (EO) are the main substitutes for monensin in the diet of cattle fed high-grain diets, this study aimed to evaluate, through meta-analysis, the effects of EO as an alternative to monensin in diets for beef cattle on feed intake, performance, carcass characteristics and ruminal fermentative parameters. Ten peer-reviewed publications with 27 treatment means were included in the data set. These effects were evaluated using random-effect models to examine the weighted mean differences (WMD) between EO treatment and control treatment (diets with monensin). Heterogeneity was explored by meta-regression and subgroup analysis. The substitution of EO for monensin did not affect methane production, ruminal pH values, average daily gain, feed efficiency or carcass weight. However, carcass dressing percentage (WMD = 0.38%; P = 0.03), ribeye area (WMD = 0.82 cm2; P < 0.0001) and subcutaneous fat thickness (WMD = 0.56 mm; P < 0.0001) values increased. Although the use of EO instead of monensin had no influence on the performance of beef cattle fed high-grain diets, the prevalence of hepatic abscesses increased 84.9% and the replacement of monensin by EO increased the risk ratio of hepatic abscess prevalence by 107%. Therefore, the use of EO in high-grain beef cattle diets was ineffective in protecting the liver against abscesses.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Diet/veterinary , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Cattle Diseases/epidemiology , Digestion , Eating , Edible Grain , Fermentation , Food Additives , Liver Abscess/epidemiology , Liver Abscess/veterinary , Rumen/metabolism
3.
J Dairy Res ; 88(1): 38-44, 2021 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33594962

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to compare the effect of two different preventive protocols, on serum ß-hydroxybutyrate (BHB) concentration and liver health indices pre-partum and during early-lactation in high-yielding Holstein dairy cows. One hundred cows were randomly divided into three groups: control group (CTRL, n = 20, without preventive treatment), second group (SUPP, n = 40 animals treated with a compound based on acetyl-methionine, inositol, cyanocobalamin, l-alanine, l-arginine, l-threonine, l-glutamic acid supplementation and α-lipoic acid) and third group (MON, n = 40 animals treated with monensin). Blood samples were collected from all cows at on 3 occasions pre-partum and 3 occasions post-partum. Body condition (BCS) score was evaluated and glucose, non-esterified fatty acids (NEFA), BHB, triglycerides, total cholesterol, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), γ-glutamyltransferase (GGT), total bilirubin, total proteins, globulins, albumin and urea concentrations were assessed. Two-way repeated measures analysis of variance was applied. Statistically significant differences among the three experimental groups were found in the values of all studied parameters (P < 0.05). Our results confirm the established beneficial effect of MON treatment in decreasing BHB levels and increasing glucose availability after calving. Serum biochemical analysis revealed the expected post-partum alterations attributable to adaptations that influenced the metabolism and liver function in CTRL, whereas these alterations were reduced or absent in SUPP and MON. Results from the present study suggest that both preventive protocols, but in particular SUPP, could positively affect selected indicators of energy metabolism reducing the risk of hyperketonaemia and increase of liver function in Holstein dairy cows, both pre- and post-partum.


Subject(s)
3-Hydroxybutyric Acid/blood , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Fatty Acids, Nonesterified/blood , Ketosis/veterinary , Lactation/blood , Peripartum Period/blood , Amino Acids/administration & dosage , Animals , Blood Proteins/analysis , Cattle , Female , Ketosis/prevention & control , Methionine/administration & dosage , Monensin/administration & dosage , Thioctic Acid/administration & dosage , Vitamin B 12/administration & dosage
4.
Sci Rep ; 10(1): 19310, 2020 11 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33168849

ABSTRACT

The investigative material 3-nitrooxypropanol (3-NOP) can reduce enteric methane emissions from beef cattle. North American beef cattle are often supplemented the drug monensin to improve feed digestibility. Residual and confounding effects of these additives on manure greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions are unknown. This research tested whether manure carbon and nitrogen, and GHG and ammonia emissions, differed from cattle fed a typical finishing diet and 3-NOP [125-200 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM) feed], or both 3-NOP (125-200 mg kg-1 DM) and monensin (33 mg kg-1 DM) together, compared to a control (no supplements) when manure was stockpiled or composted for 202 days. Consistent with other studies, cumulative GHGs (except nitrous oxide) and ammonia emissions were higher from composted compared to stockpiled manure (all P < 0.01). Dry matter, total carbon and total nitrogen mass balance estimates, and cumulative GHG and ammonia emissions, from stored manure were not affected by 3-NOP or monensin. During the current experiment, supplementing beef cattle with 3-NOP did not significantly affect manure GHG or NH3 emissions during storage under the tested management conditions, suggesting supplementing cattle with 3-NOP does not have residual effects on manure decomposition as estimated using total carbon and nitrogen losses and GHG emissions.


Subject(s)
Air Pollutants/analysis , Ammonia/analysis , Greenhouse Gases/analysis , Methane/analysis , Monensin/administration & dosage , Propanols/administration & dosage , Animal Feed , Animals , Canada , Carbon , Carbon Dioxide , Cattle , Climate , Diet/veterinary , Manure , Nitrogen , Nitrous Oxide/analysis , Rain , Red Meat , Temperature
5.
J Dairy Sci ; 103(11): 10207-10218, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32952029

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate growth and performance of postweaning heifers supplemented with monensin (MON), sodium butyrate (SB), or the combination of MON and SB (MSB) compared with heifers not receiving these feed additives. Forty Holstein heifers [mean age 84.2 ± 1.2 d; body weight (BW) 99.8 ± 10.8 kg (mean ± SD)] were housed in a freestall barn, blocked by birth date, and randomly assigned to 1 of 4 treatments in a randomized complete block design. Treatments were (1) 100 g of soybean meal carrier (control; CON); (2) 0.75 g of SB/kg of BW + carrier (SB); (3) 1 mg of MON/kg of BW + carrier (MON); (4) 1 mg of MON/kg of BW + 0.75 g of SB/kg of BW (MSB). Data were analyzed using single degree of freedom contrasts evaluating CON versus additives (ADD), SB versus MON, and SB and MON versus MSB. Treatments were hand-mixed daily. Feed and orts were measured daily and frozen at -20°C. Orts samples were subsampled for dry matter (DM) determination, and total mixed ration samples were taken weekly and composited monthly for DM and nutrient analysis. Initial BW, heart and paunch girths, body length, blood samples, and fecal coccidia counts were measured before the start and weekly during the 12-wk trial. Blood samples were analyzed for glucose, plasma urea nitrogen (PUN), and ketone concentrations. Apparent total-tract nutrient digestibility was determined from d 21 to 27 and from d 63 to 69 using acid detergent insoluble ash as a marker. Daily dry matter intake (DMI) and metabolizable energy intake were increased in ADD compared with CON, and average BW, final BW, and heart girth tended to increase. Whereas MSB tended to be greater than SB and MON for heart girth, feed efficiency was greater with MON compared with SB. Compared with CON, ADD decreased coccidia counts. No effect of treatment on PUN was detected. Monensin and SB tended to have greater plasma glucose than MSB did. Average blood ketone concentrations were greater with ADD versus CON, in SB versus MON, and in MSB versus SB and MON. During the wk-3 digestibility phase, DMI tended to be greater in heifers fed SB versus MON, as well as in heifers fed MSB versus SB and MON. Digestibility of nutrients were similar, except that starch digestibility was increased in heifers fed MSB versus SB and MON. During the wk-9 digestibility phase, DMI and digestibility of nutrients were similar, except NDF, which tended to be greater in CON than in ADD. Overall, ADD resulted in positive growth and reduced coccidia compared with CON.


Subject(s)
Butyric Acid/administration & dosage , Cattle/physiology , Diet/veterinary , Digestion/drug effects , Health Status , Monensin/administration & dosage , Animal Feed/analysis , Animals , Body Composition , Body Weight/drug effects , Cattle/growth & development , Cattle Diseases/prevention & control , Dietary Supplements , Energy Intake , Female , Gastrointestinal Tract/metabolism , Nutrients/metabolism , Rumen/metabolism
6.
PLoS One ; 15(8): e0237118, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32764795

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of supplementation with 100ppm sodium monensin or 0.15% of a blend of functional oils (cashew nut oil + castor oil) on the intestinal microbiota of broilers challenged with three different Eimeria spp. The challenge was accomplished by inoculating broiler chicks with sporulated oocysts of Eimeria tenella, Eimeria acervulina, and Eimeria maxima via oral gavage. A total of 864, day-old male broiler chicks (Cobb) were randomly assigned to six treatments (eight pens/treatment; 18 broilers/pen) in a 3 × 2 factorial arrangement, composed of three additives (control, monensin or blend), with or without Eimeria challenge. Intestinal contents was collected at 28 days of age for microbiota analysis by sequencing 16s rRNA in V3 and V4 regions using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Taxonomy was assigned through the SILVA database version 132, using the QIIME 2 software version 2019.1. No treatment effects (p > 0.05) were observed in the microbial richness at the family level estimated by Chao1 and the biodiversity assessed by Simpson's index, except for Shannon's index (p < 0.05). The intestinal microbiota was dominated by members of the order Clostridiales and Lactobacillales, followed by the families Ruminococcaceae, Bacteroidaceae, and Lactobacillaceae, regardless of treatment. When the controls were compared, in the challenged control group there was an increase in Erysipelotrichaceae, Lactobacillaceae, Bacteroidaceae, Streptococcaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae, and a decrease in Ruminococcaceae. Similar results were found for a challenged group that received monensin, while the blend partially mitigated this variation. Therefore, the blend alleviated the impact of coccidiosis challenge on the microbiome of broilers compared to monensin.


Subject(s)
Coccidiosis/veterinary , Eimeria/isolation & purification , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Monensin/administration & dosage , Plant Oils/administration & dosage , Poultry Diseases/diet therapy , Anacardium/chemistry , Animal Feed , Animals , Chickens/parasitology , Coccidiosis/diet therapy , Coccidiosis/immunology , Coccidiosis/parasitology , DNA, Protozoan/isolation & purification , Eimeria/genetics , Eimeria/immunology , Eimeria/pathogenicity , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/immunology , Male , Oocysts/pathogenicity , Poultry Diseases/immunology , Poultry Diseases/parasitology , RNA, Ribosomal, 16S/genetics , Ricinus/chemistry
7.
J Dairy Sci ; 103(9): 8119-8129, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684446

ABSTRACT

Our previous work indicated that feeding oregano essential oil (OEO) in combination with monensin (MON) may not be mutually beneficial to dairy calf growth performance. To evaluate this observation further, a 240-d long-term growth experiment was conducted using 12 young growing Holstein bulls using a 2 × 2 factorial treatment arrangement. Main factors were OEO and MON arranged in 4 individual treatments: (1) ration fed without OEO or MON (control), (2) OEO fed at 26 mg/kg of dry matter (DM), (3) MON fed at 25 mg/kg of DM, and (4) OEO and MON fed in combination (OEO+MON). Holstein bulls were 70 d of age and similar in body weight (BW; 93.3 ± 4.54 kg) and individually fed for 240 d. The targeted feeding rates of OEO and MON were blended into 200 g of concentrate and top dressed each morning to a corn stalklage-based ration. Body weights, frame measurements, and blood samples were collected monthly. Interactions of OEO by MON were detected for BW, BW gain, average daily gain, and a trend for feed conversion. Bulls fed OEO or MON demonstrated greater final BW (368, 385, 381, and 358 kg for control, OEO, MON, and OEO+MON, respectively), and BW gains (278, 292, 285, and 265 kg) and average daily gain (1.16, 1.22, 1.19, 1.11 kg/d) were greatest for bulls fed OEO or MON compared with bulls fed OEO+MON; bulls fed the control were intermediate and similar to bulls fed MON. Intake of DM was greater for bulls fed OEO (6.55, 6.99, 6.60, and 6.42 kg/d) compared with bulls fed remaining treatments. Frame growth gain measurements for heart girth, abdominal girth, withers height, body length, and cannon bone circumference were similar for bulls fed all treatments. Serum triglyceride (0.23, 0.25, 0.28, and 0.24 mmol/L) concentrations were greater for bulls fed MON compared with bulls fed the control and OEO+MON, and bulls fed OEO were intermediate and similar. Cholesterol (2.06, 2.29, 2.20, and 2.07 mmol/L) concentrations were greater for bulls fed OEO compared with bulls fed the control and OEO+MON, and bulls fed MON were intermediate and similar. Serum antioxidant measurements were similar for bulls fed all treatments. Serum IgA, IgG, and IgM concentrations were similar for bulls fed all treatments. Feeding OEO or MON separately can improve growth performance of growing Holstein bulls. We do not know why the combination of OEO and MON is antagonistic to growth performance of Holstein bulls. However, these technologies should not be fed in combination to growing dairy cattle.


Subject(s)
Dietary Supplements , Growth/drug effects , Monensin/pharmacology , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Origanum/chemistry , Animal Feed , Animals , Body Weight/drug effects , Cattle , Diet/veterinary , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage
8.
J Anim Sci ; 98(7)2020 Jul 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32632450

ABSTRACT

Gut health is critically important for growing neonatal calves, and nutritional technologies are needed to prevent disease and stress challenges. Previous work feeding monensin (MON) in combination with an oregano, prebiotic, and cobalt-lactate (EOC) blend had demonstrated improved calf gut health and growth performance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the growth performance of calves fed MON and EOC alone or in combination. Eighty (80) newborn Holstein (37) female and (43) male calves were randomly assigned to one of four treatments arranged in a 2 × 2 factorial (MON and EOC). Treatments were: 1) Control: without MON or EOC added to the calf starter (CS); 2) MON: 50.8 mg/kg CS (Elanco, Greenfield, IN); 3) EOC: 44.1 mg/kg CS (Rum-A-Fresh, Ralco Inc. Marshall, MN); 4) MON + EOC: MON and EOC added to CS. Calves were fed colostrum followed by whole milk through weaning at 42 d, while CS was fed ad libitum through the 70-d experimental period. The MON by EOC interaction was found to be nonsignificant (P > 0.41) for growth performance. Calves fed without or with MON demonstrated similar (P > 0.70) body weight (BW; 68.7 and 68.9 kg without and with MON, respectively), while calves fed EOC demonstrated greater (P < 0.01) BW (67.3 and 70.4 kg without and with EOC, respectively) compared with calves fed without EOC. Calves fed a CS containing MON were similar (P > 0.47) in average daily gain (ADG; 0.88 and 0.91 kg/d) compared with calves fed without MON; however, feeding calves a CS with EOC increased (P < 0.01) ADG (0.84 and 0.95 kg/d) by 13% through the 70-d experimental period compared with calves not fed EOC. Frame measurements indicated that the greater ADG was due to increased (P < 0.10) frame growth for calves fed essential oils (EO) compared with calves fed without EO. A MON by EOC interaction (P < 0.01) for serum propionate concentration demonstrated calves fed MON + EOC and EOC were greater (P < 0.05) compared with calves fed Control, while calves fed MON were intermediate and different (P < 0.05). Feeding calves a CS with EOC increased (P < 0.04) immunoglobulin A, immunoglobulin G, and immunoglobulin M concentrations compared with calves fed without EOC. A MON by EOC interaction was detected (P < 0.01) for total tract starch digestibility for calves fed EOC or MON + EOC demonstrating greater (P < 0.05) starch digestibilities than Control-fed calves. These data demonstrate that EOC and MON fed in combination was not beneficial for enhancing the growth performance, but that calf growth performance can be improved with EOC compared with MON.


Subject(s)
Cattle/physiology , Cobalt/pharmacology , Diet/veterinary , Monensin/pharmacology , Origanum , Prebiotics , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Body Weight , Cobalt/administration & dosage , Colostrum , Female , Male , Milk , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , Pregnancy , Starch
9.
Meat Sci ; 168: 108195, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32470759

ABSTRACT

The effects of feeding essential oils and(or) benzoic acid to finishing steers on fatty acid profile and oxidative stability (color and lipid oxidation) of beef longissimus thoracis steaks and ground beef was determined in this study. Beef was procured from crossbred beef steers (n = 63) fed one of five dietary treatments: (1) control (no antibiotics fed); (2) monensin/tylosin (monensin supplemented at 33 mg/kg [DM basis]; tylosin supplemented at 11 mg/kg [DM basis]); (3) essential oils (supplemented at 1.0 g/steer/day); (4) benzoic acid (supplemented at 0.5% [DM basis]); and (5) combination (essential oils supplemented at 1.0 g/steer/day and benzoic acid supplemented at 0.5% [DM basis]). Although no improvements in shelf life stability were observed, feeding finishing cattle essential oils and(or) benzoic acid did not have detrimental impacts on beef color stability and lipid oxidation over a simulated retail display period.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Benzoic Acid , Oils, Volatile , Red Meat/analysis , Animals , Anti-Infective Agents/administration & dosage , Cattle , Diet/veterinary , Fatty Acids/analysis , Food Storage , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Tylosin/administration & dosage
10.
Avian Pathol ; 49(4): 389-393, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32310002

ABSTRACT

A clinical study was made into the abilities of nicarbazin and monensin and a nicarbazin + monensin combination to control Eimeria acervulina, E. maxima, and E. tenella in chickens. When included in the feed, at concentrations of 40 ppm nicarbazin or 40 ppm monensin, these products showed partial efficacy evaluated by daily weight gain (DWG) but no activity judged by daily feed intake (DFI) or feed conversion ratio (FCR). By contrast, the combination of 40 ppm nicarbazin + 40 ppm monensin provided complete control of infection judged by greater DWG and DFI, and lower FCR. Monensin at a concentration of 40 ppm was ineffective in preventing lesions caused by all three species. Nicarbazin at a concentration of 40 ppm was unable to suppress lesions of E. acervulina and E. maxima but was able to suppress lesions caused by E. tenella. Nicarbazin 40 ppm + monensin 40 ppm suppressed lesions of all three species. RESEARCH HIGHLIGHTS Nicarbazin or monensin at 40 ppm gave only partial control of Eimeria spp. A combination of 40 ppm nicarbazin + 40 ppm monensin controlled DWG, DFI and FCR. Nicarbazin or monensin at 40 ppm did not suppress all Eimeria spp. lesions. Nicarbazin 40 ppm + monensin 40 ppm suppressed lesions of all three species.


Subject(s)
Coccidiosis/veterinary , Coccidiostats/administration & dosage , Eimeria/drug effects , Monensin/administration & dosage , Nicarbazin/administration & dosage , Poultry Diseases/drug therapy , Animals , Coccidiosis/drug therapy , Coccidiosis/parasitology , Drug Synergism , Eimeria/genetics , Male , Poultry Diseases/virology
11.
Molecules ; 24(24)2019 Dec 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31817501

ABSTRACT

Lincomycin, monensin, and roxarsone are commonly used veterinary drugs. This study investigated their behaviours in different soils and their toxic effects on environmental organisms. Sorption and mobility analyses were performed to detect the migration capacity of drugs in soils. Toxic effects were evaluated by inhibition or acute toxicity tests on six organism species: algae, plants, daphnia, fish, earthworms and quails. The log Kd values (Freundlich model) of drugs were: lincomycin in laterite soil was 1.82; monensin in laterite soil was 2.76; and roxarsone in black soil was 1.29. The Rf value of lincomycin, roxarsone, monensin were 0.4995, 0.4493 and 0.8348 in laterite soil, and 0.5258, 0.5835 and 0.8033 in black soil, respectively. The EC50 for Scenedesmus obliquus, Arabidopsis thaliana, Daphnia magna and LC50/LD50 for Eisenia fetida, Danio rerio, and Coturnix coturnix were: 13.15 mg/L,32.18 mg/kg dry soil,292.6 mg/L,452.7 mg/L,5.74 g/kg dry soil and 103.9 mg/kg (roxarsone); 1.085 mg/L, 25 mg/kg dry soil, 21.1 mg/L, 4.76 mg/L, 0.346 g/kg dry soil and 672.8 mg/kg (monensin); 0.813 mg/L, 35.40 mg/kg dry soil, >400 mg/L, >2800 mg/L, >15 g/kg dry soil, >2000 mg/kg (lincomycin). These results showed that the environmental effects of veterinary drug residues should not be neglected, due to their mobility in environmental media and potential toxic effects on environmental organisms.


Subject(s)
Arabidopsis/metabolism , Coturnix/metabolism , Daphnia/metabolism , Lincomycin , Monensin , Oligochaeta/metabolism , Roxarsone , Scenedesmus/metabolism , Zebrafish/metabolism , Animals , Lincomycin/adverse effects , Lincomycin/pharmacokinetics , Monensin/administration & dosage , Monensin/pharmacokinetics , Roxarsone/adverse effects , Roxarsone/pharmacokinetics
12.
Arq. bras. med. vet. zootec. (Online) ; 71(6): 1999-2008, Nov.-Dec. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS, VETINDEX | ID: biblio-1055106

ABSTRACT

The aim of this paper was to evaluate the effects of including virginiamycin (VM), sodium monensin (MON) or the association (VM+MON) in the energetic mineral supplement, on the intake and performance of beef cattle on pasture. Forty Nellore heifers with 24 months of age and initial body weight (BW) of 251.5±16.6kg, were distributed in four treatments in a randomized block design. Treatments consisted of adding VM, MON or VM+MON to the supplement (CONT). Additive concentrations were defined to reach a dose of 40 to 45mg/100kg BW. The herbage allowance was not a limiting factor for the animals' intake. Supplement intake was lower than expected, with 33.0, 18.8 and 26.3mg per 100kg BW for VM, MON and VM+MON, respectively. Dry matter intake (DMI, mean=2.65% BW) and animal performance were not affected by the inclusion of additives. The average daily gain (ADG) was 0.561kg/animal day-1. The inclusion of additives in energetic mineral supplement does not affect the DMI and the ADG of grazing animals. The variability in supplement intake and daily dose intake of additives may have influenced the performance of the animals. Monensin inclusion presented the less expensive supplementation cost, due to reduction in supplement intake without changing weight gain.(AU)


Objetivou-se avaliar o efeito da inclusão dos aditivos virginiamicina (VM), monensina sódica (MON) e associação (VM+MON) no suplemento energético-mineral sobre o consumo e desempenho de bovinos manejados em pastagem de Urochloa Brizantha cv. Marandu. Foram utilizadas 40 novilhas Nelore com 24 meses de idade e peso corporal (PC) inicial médio de 251,5+16,6kg distribuídas em delineamento em blocos ao acaso com quatro tratamentos. Os tratamentos consistiam de suplemento energético-mineral (CONT) acrescido de VM, MON ou VM+MON. A oferta de forragem não limitou o consumo dos animais. O consumo dos aditivos foi de 0; 33,0; 18,8 e 26,3mg por 100kg de PC para CONT, VM, MON e VM+MON, respectivamente. O consumo de matéria seca e o desempenho dos animais não foram afetados pela inclusão dos aditivos. O ganho médio diário dos animais foi de 0,561kg dia -1 , sem diferença entre os tratamentos. A inclusão de aditivos no suplemento energético-mineral não alterou o CMS e o desempenho dos animais em pastejo. A variabilidade no consumo de suplemento e na dose ingerida dos aditivos pode ter influenciado o desempenho dos animais.(AU)


Subject(s)
Animals , Female , Cattle , Monensin/administration & dosage , Weight Gain , Virginiamycin/administration & dosage , Ionophores , Food Additives/administration & dosage
13.
J Dairy Sci ; 102(10): 9097-9106, 2019 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31400899

ABSTRACT

Mycobacterium avium ssp. paratuberculosis (MAP) is the causative agent of Johne's disease, an enteric infection of ruminants that causes significant economic burden for dairy and beef producers. Efforts to control MAP in endemic herds typically focus on herd management practices such as limiting exposure or early culling of infected animals and, occasionally, vaccination. The ionophore monensin sodium may have protective effects against MAP both in vivo and in vitro; however, this has not been thoroughly evaluated experimentally. Using a direct intestinal MAP challenge model, we have observed similarities regarding persistence of MAP in tissues and apparent resilience to infection compared with experimental oral infection or natural disease. Here we sought to investigate the effects of oral monensin supplementation in experimentally MAP-infected calves. We examined the persistence of MAP in the intestinal tissues, MAP-induced intestinal inflammation, fecal MAP shedding, and seroconversion using a commercial serologic assay. Monensin-supplemented MAP-infected calves demonstrated evidence for resilience to MAP infection earlier in this study compared with monensin-free MAP-infected calves. However, statistical modeling did not identify a significant effect of monensin on outcomes of infection, and more work is required to understand how monensin affects early tissue colonization of MAP in calves.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Cattle Diseases/drug therapy , Monensin/therapeutic use , Paratuberculosis/drug therapy , Administration, Oral , Animals , Cattle , Disease Models, Animal , Feces/microbiology , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Mycobacterium avium subsp. paratuberculosis/immunology , Paratuberculosis/microbiology
14.
J Anim Physiol Anim Nutr (Berl) ; 103(4): 988-996, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31172562

ABSTRACT

The effects of adding crude glycerine with sodium monensin or essential oils to beef cattle diets on the intake, degradability of DM and nutrients, rumen concentration of volatile fatty acids (VFA) and in vitro gas production were evaluated. Five ruminally cannulated Nellore steers were randomly assigned to a 5 × 5 Latin square design. The treatments were as follows: CONT, without crude glycerine and additives; EO, with essential oils and without crude glycerine; MON, with sodium monensin and without crude glycerine; EOG, with essential oils and crude glycerine; MONG, with sodium monensin and crude glycerine. Treatments with essential oil and sodium monensin increased the NDF and STC intake and the DM degradability. When crude glycerine was combined with either sodium monensin or essential oil, there was a reduction in DM, NDF and STC intake and an increase in DM and CP degradability of the diets. The adding crude glycerine to essential oil diets reduced the CH4 production. Sodium monensin treatments reduced DM and NDF intake and the production of total gas, CH4 , total VFA and acetic acid concentration. In conclusion, the adding crude glycerine (200 g/kg DM) with either sodium monensin (0.03 g/kg DM) or essential oil (0.5 g/kg DM) can be utilized in diets for Nellore cattle without causing detrimental effects on feed intake and improving the DM degradability.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Cattle/physiology , Diet/veterinary , Eating/drug effects , Glycerol/pharmacology , Rumen/physiology , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Digestion/drug effects , Digestion/physiology , Fatty Acids, Volatile , Glycerol/administration & dosage , Housing, Animal , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage
15.
J Vet Intern Med ; 33(4): 1833-1839, 2019 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31058361

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Characterization of the clinical signs, response to treatment and prognosis can be useful information for decision-making when evaluating cattle with pharyngeal trauma. OBJECTIVE: To describe the signalment, history, clinicopathologic, endoscopic, ultrasonographic, radiographic, and postmortem findings as well as treatments and outcomes of cattle diagnosed with pharyngeal perforation/trauma. ANIMALS: Review of medical records of cattle >1 month of age admitted to a Veterinary Teaching Hospital from 1995 to 2017. METHODS: Retrospective study. Review of medical records of cattle with pharyngeal perforation/trauma identified by oral or endoscopic examination in hospital setting. RESULTS: Twenty-seven out of 7550 (0.36%) cases met the inclusion criteria. Pharyngeal perforation/trauma was associated with the administration of a bolus in 24 (89%) cows and a magnet in 3 (11%) cases. The boluses contained monensin (n = 12), calcium salts (n = 5), iodine (n = 1), aspirin (n = 1), vitamins (n = 1), and an unknown product (n = 4). The primary clinical signs were dysphagia, swelling of the throatlatch, subcutaneous emphysema, swelling, and pain on palpation of the throatlatch. Seventeen (63%) cows were discharged whereas 10 (37%) were euthanized. Median time between the suspected traumatic event and hospital admission was 1 day (range: 0.5-3 days) and 2 days (range: 0.5-15) for surviving and nonsurviving cattle, respectively. All 5 cows that suffered pharyngeal trauma associated with administration of calcium salt bolus were euthanized. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Pharyngeal trauma is a rare condition in cattle. Case fatality rate increases if not diagnosed and treated promptly. The nature of the penetrating foreign body influences the outcome.


Subject(s)
Administration, Oral , Cattle/injuries , Foreign Bodies/veterinary , Pharyngeal Diseases/veterinary , Pharynx/injuries , Animals , Calcium Compounds/administration & dosage , Female , Foreign Bodies/diagnosis , Magnets/adverse effects , Monensin/administration & dosage , Pharyngeal Diseases/diagnosis , Pharyngeal Diseases/therapy , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies
16.
Trop Anim Health Prod ; 51(2): 339-344, 2019 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30128912

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of monensin on performance of beef heifers fed warm-season forages. Brangus heifers (n = 24) were stratified by BW and BCS, and randomly assigned into 1 of 12 bahiagrass pastures (1.2 ha and 2 heifers/pasture). Heifers were offered 14 kg of sugarcane molasses and 3.5 kg of cottonseed meal weekly from day 0 to 84. Treatments were randomly assigned to pastures (6 pastures/treatment) and consisted of heifers supplemented with or without 200 mg/day of monensin. On d 85, heifers were allocated to individual drylot pens, provided free choice access to bermudagrass hay, and received their respective treatment for 10 d of adaptation and 11 d of data collection. Monensin did not impact (P ≥ 0.13) heifer BW, BCS, overall ADG, bahiagrass IVDOM, CP, herbage mass, and allowance. Supplement disappearance after 10 and 34 h of supplementation was greater for control vs. monensin heifers (P = 0.04) and tended to be greater for control vs. monensin heifers 24 h post-supplementation (P = 0.07). Plasma concentrations of glucose, IGF-1, and BUN (P ≥ 0.24) did not differ between treatments. From d 85 to 106, forage and total DM intake, in vivo DM digestibility, and heifer growth performance did not differ between treatments (P ≥ 0.12). Therefore, adding monensin to sugarcane molasses-based supplements decreased supplement consumption rate, but did not impact growth and blood parameters of heifers grazing warm-season grasses with limited nutritive value.


Subject(s)
Cattle/growth & development , Molasses/analysis , Monensin/metabolism , Saccharum , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Cattle/blood , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Female , Monensin/administration & dosage
17.
J Anim Sci ; 97(2): 885-899, 2019 Feb 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30481297

ABSTRACT

Fifty-four Alpine doelings (initial BW and age of 31.7 ± 0.38 kg and 306 ± 1.9 d, respectively) were allocated to nine treatments individually fed for ad libitum intake of 25% concentrate and 75% forage diets (DM basis). Alfalfa was the forage in the control diet. Other diets contained Sericea lespedeza as the forage, with 1.25% DM of quebracho extract included in the concentrate fraction for a dietary condensed tannin level of 8.4%. Lespedeza treatments were no additive (L) and inclusion of monensin (I) at 22 mg/kg DM (L-I), soybean oil at 3% (L-S), coconut oil at 3% (L-N), I and 3% soybean oil (L-I-S), I and 3% coconut oil (L-I-N), 1.5% soybean oil and 1.5% coconut oil (L-S-N), and I, 1.5% soybean oil, and 1.5% coconut oil (L-I-S-N). The experiment was 12 wk with two 6-wk periods. Gas exchange was determined in weeks 6 and 12, and other measures occurred in weeks 5 and 11. The control diet offered averaged 2.67% nitrogen, 43.8% neutral detergent fiber, and 8.8% acid detergent lignin, and the L diet offered averaged 2.03% nitrogen, 42.8% neutral detergent fiber, and 13.2% acid detergent lignin. There were no treatment × period interactions for digestibilities (P ≥ 0.770) or methane emission (P ≥ 0.324). There were differences (P < 0.001) between the control treatment and diets with lespedeza in intake of DM (1.46, 1.23, 1.30, 1.18, 1.32, 1.10, 1.02, 1.20, and 1.01 kg/d; SEM = 0.059), digestibility of OM (57.4%, 50.9%, 51.8%, 52.7%, 50.3%, 52.1%, 52.1%, 51.9%, and 49.8%; SEM = 1.42), and digestibility of nitrogen (59.1%, 31.2%, 32.5%, 37.1%, 31.6%, 38.3%, 30.4%, 38.4%, and 34.1% for control, L, L-I, L-S, L-N, L-I-S, L-I-N, L-S-N, and L-I-S-N, respectively; SEM = 2.21). Ruminal methane emission was less (P < 0.001) for diets with lespedeza than for the control in MJ/d (1.36, 0.76, 0.84, 0.71, 0.71, 0.66, 0.65, 0.68, and 0.68; SEM = 0.048) and relative to intake of gross energy (5.92%, 3.27%, 3.49%, 3.19%, 2.84%, 2.91%, 3.20%, 3.20%, and 3.27%; SEM = 0.165) and digestible energy (11.19%, 6.98%, 7.40%, 6.38%, 5.90%, 5.69%, 6.37%, 6.38%, and 6.70% for control, L, L-I, L-S, L-N, L-I-S, L-I-N, L-S-N, and L-I-S-N, respectively; SEM = 0.400). In conclusion, the magnitude of effect of condensed tannins from lespedeza and quebracho extract on ruminal methane emission by Alpine doelings did not diminish over time and was not markedly influenced by dietary inclusion of monensin, soybean oil, or coconut oil.


Subject(s)
Eating/drug effects , Goats/physiology , Lespedeza/chemistry , Methane/metabolism , Proanthocyanidins/administration & dosage , Animals , Coconut Oil/administration & dosage , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Fiber , Digestion/drug effects , Energy Metabolism , Female , Goats/growth & development , Hot Temperature , Medicago sativa , Monensin/administration & dosage , Nitrogen/metabolism , Soybean Oil/administration & dosage
18.
J Anim Sci ; 97(1): 456-471, 2019 Jan 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30351389

ABSTRACT

Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the performance responses of finishing feedlot cattle to dietary addition of essential oils and exogenous enzymes. The treatments in each experiment consisted of (DM basis): MON-sodium monensin (26 mg/kg); BEO-a blend of essential oils (90 mg/kg); BEO+MON-a blend of essential oils plus monensin (90 mg/kg + 26 mg/kg, respectively); BEO+AM-a blend of essential oils plus exogenous α-amylase (90 mg/kg + 560 mg/kg, respectively); and BEO+AM+PRO-a blend of essential oils plus exogenous α-amylase and exogenous protease (90 mg/kg + 560 mg/kg + 840 mg/kg, respectively). Exp. 1 consisted of a 93-d finishing period using 300 Nellore bulls in a randomized complete block design. Animals fed BEO had higher DMI (P < 0.001) but similar feed efficiency to animals fed MON (P ≥ 0.98). Compared with MON, the combination of BEO+AM resulted in 810 g greater DMI (P = 0.001), 190 g greater average daily gain (P = 0.04), 18 kg heavier final body weight (P = 0.04), and 12 kg heavier hot carcass weight (P = 0.02), although feed efficiency was not significantly different between BEO+AM and MON (P = 0.89). Combining BEO+MON tended to decrease hot carcass weight compared with BEO alone (P = 0.08) but not compared with MON (P = 0.98). Treatments did not impact observed dietary net energy values (P ≥ 0.74) or the observed:expected net energy ratio (P ≥ 0.11). In Exp. 2, five ruminally cannulated Nellore steers were used to evaluate intake, apparent total tract digestibility of nutrients, and ruminal parameters in a 5 × 5 Latin square design. Feeding BEO increased the total tract digestibility of CP compared to MON (P = 0.03). Compared to MON, feeding the combination of BEO+MON increased the intake of CP (P = 0.04) and NDF (P = 0.05), with no effects on total tract digestibility of nutrients (P ≥ 0.56), except for a tendency (P = 0.09) to increase CP digestibility. Intakes of all nutrients measured, except for ether extract (P = 0.16) were greater in animals fed BEO+AM when compared with MON (P ≤ 0.03), with no differences on total tract nutrient digestibilities (P ≥ 0.11) between these two treatments. In summary, diets containing the BEO used herein enhanced DMI of growing-finishing feedlot cattle compared with a basal diet containing MON without impair feed efficiency. A synergism between BEO and AM was detected, further increasing cattle performance and carcass production compared to MON.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Cattle , Diet/veterinary , Oils, Volatile/pharmacology , alpha-Amylases/pharmacology , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena , Animals , Digestion/physiology , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oils, Volatile/administration & dosage , Random Allocation , alpha-Amylases/administration & dosage
19.
J Anim Sci ; 96(12): 5112-5123, 2018 Dec 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30260413

ABSTRACT

Two experiments evaluated the effects of concentrate amount and monensin inclusion on growth and physiological parameters of early-weaned beef calves consuming warm-season grasses in drylot (Exp. 1) and pastures (Exp. 2). In both experiments, treatments consisted of two concentrate DM amounts (1 or 2% of BW) and two inclusion rates of monensin (0 or 20 mg of monensin/kg of total DM intake). In Exp. 1, 48 Angus × Brahman crossbred early-weaned (EW) beef calves (initial age = 90 ± 13 d; initial BW = 83 ± 12 kg) were distributed in 12 drylot pens (four calves per pen; three pens per treatment) and provided stargrass (Cynodon nlemfuensis) hay (9% CP and 52% IVDOM) at amounts to ensure 10% DM refusals for 56 d. In Exp. 2, 36 Angus × Brahman crossbred EW heifer calves (initial BW = 171 ± 15 kg) were randomly allocated into one of 12 bahiagrass (Paspalum notatum) pastures on a continuous and fixed stocking rate (1 ha and three heifers per pasture; three pastures per treatment) and received daily supplementation of their respective treatments for 84 d. In both experiments, effects of monensin inclusion × concentrate amount were not detected for any variable (P ≥ 0.14), but overall ADG and plasma IGF-1 concentrations were greater (P ≤ 0.05), whereas fecal coccidia egg counts tended (P = 0.09; Exp. 1) or were less (P = 0.05; Exp. 2) for calves offered concentrate with vs. without monensin inclusion. Calves offered concentrate at 2% of BW had greater (P ≤ 0.05) overall ADG (Exps. 1 and 2), herbage mass (Exp. 2 only), in vivo apparent digestibility, total DMI and plasma concentrations of glucose and IGF-1 (Exp. 1 only), less forage DM intake (Exp. 1 only), and no effects on fecal coccidia egg counts (Exps. 1 and 2) compared to calves offered concentrate at 1% of BW. Increasing concentrate amount is an effective management practice to increase ADG and decrease forage DMI in early-weaned calves consuming warm-season grasses, whereas the decrease in fecal coccidia egg count and additional ADG provide evidence that monensin should be supplied to early-weaned calves grazing warm-season pastures and receiving concentrate at 1% of BW or above.


Subject(s)
Animal Feed/analysis , Monensin/pharmacology , Poaceae/chemistry , Animals , Cattle , Dietary Supplements , Edible Grain , Female , Insulin-Like Growth Factor I , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Poaceae/classification , Random Allocation , Recombinant Proteins , Seasons , Weaning
20.
Poult Sci ; 97(10): 3622-3634, 2018 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30016495

ABSTRACT

The dietary effect of fructooligosaccharide (FOS) supplementation as an alternative to antibiotics on ileal mucosa and digesta microbiota was investigated in broiler chickens (n = 180). The study included three dietary treatments from d1 to 21: 1) positive control (PC), a wheat-corn-soybean meal based diet containing antibiotics (virginiamycin and monensin); 2) negative control (NC), as wheat-corn-soybean meal based diet without antibiotics; and 3) NC + FOS, as NC diet supplemented 0.5% of FOS. Ileal mucosa and digesta were collected and subjected to 16S rRNA-based next generation sequencing. No significant difference on α-, ß-diversity and bacterial phyla was observed between ileal mucosa and digesta or between the three dietary treatments. Partial least square discriminant analysis and Venn analysis showed that different bacterial genera were associated with different ileal sites or diets. A distinct distance on ileal mucosa bacteria communities were observed between PC and NC + FOS dietary treatments. FOS supplementation increased the number of unique genera and resulted in a more diverse microbiota in the ileal mucosa when compared with PC and NC groups. Furthermore, microorganisms that have pathogenic properties such as Helicobacter and Desulfovibrio were found significantly reduced when compared between NC and NC + FOS groups in the ileal mucosa. Lachnospiraceae (f) was greater in the ileal mucosa than that in the digesta, particularly among the NC + FOS dietary group. Overall, supplementing FOS in broiler chicken diets may be able to modulate gut microbiota in favor of chicken health, which in turn, can be used as an alternative method to replace antibiotic growth promoters (AGPs). Future investigation on the mechanism of FOS and other prebiotic products as dietary supplements is warranted.


Subject(s)
Chickens/metabolism , Chickens/microbiology , Gastrointestinal Microbiome/drug effects , Ileum/microbiology , Oligosaccharides/metabolism , Animal Feed/analysis , Animal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena/drug effects , Animals , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Diet/veterinary , Dietary Supplements/analysis , Intestinal Mucosa/microbiology , Male , Monensin/administration & dosage , Oligosaccharides/administration & dosage , Random Allocation , Virginiamycin/administration & dosage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...