A metformin add-on clinical study in multiple sclerosis to evaluate brain remyelination and neurodegeneration (MACSiMiSE-BRAIN): study protocol for a multi-center randomized placebo controlled clinical trial.

Introduction: Despite advances in immunomodulatory treatments of multiple sclerosis (MS), patients with non-active progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS) continue to face a significant unmet need. Demyelination, smoldering inflammation and neurodegeneration are important drivers of disability progression that are insufficiently targeted by current treatment approaches. Promising preclinical data support repurposing of metformin for treatment of PMS. The objective of this clinical trial is to evaluate whether metformin, as add-on treatment, is superior to placebo in delaying disease progression in patients with non-active PMS. Methods and analysis: MACSiMiSE-BRAIN is a multi-center two-arm, 1:1 randomized, triple-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, conducted at five sites in Belgium. Enrollment of 120 patients with non-active PMS is planned. Each participant will undergo a screening visit with assessment of baseline magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), clinical tests, questionnaires, and a safety laboratory assessment. Following randomization, participants will be assigned to either the treatment (metformin) or placebo group. Subsequently, they will undergo a 96-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is change in walking speed, as measured by the Timed 25-Foot Walk Test, from baseline to 96 weeks. Secondary outcome measures include change in neurological disability (Expanded Disability Status Score), information processing speed (Symbol Digit Modalities Test) and hand function (9-Hole Peg test). Annual brain MRI will be performed to assess evolution in brain volumetry and diffusion metrics. As patients may not progress in all domains, a composite outcome, the Overall Disability Response Score will be additionally evaluated as an exploratory outcome. Other exploratory outcomes will consist of paramagnetic rim lesions, the 2-minute walking test and health economic analyses as well as both patient- and caregiver-reported outcomes like the EQ-5D-5L, the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale and the Caregiver Strain Index. Ethics and dissemination: Clinical trial authorization from regulatory agencies [Ethical Committee and Federal Agency for Medicines and Health Products (FAMHP)] was obtained after submission to the centralized European Clinical Trial Information System. The results of this clinical trial will be disseminated at scientific conferences, in peer-reviewed publications, to patient associations and the general public. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05893225, EUCT number: 2023-503190-38-00.

Recent advances in the treatment of primary and secondary progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: The article highlights upcoming potential treatments, which target different phases of inflammation and offer remyelinating strategies as well as direct and indirect neuroprotective and oligodendrocyte protective effects, providing a hopeful outlook for patients with primary and secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS and SPMS). OBJECTIVES: The review aims to identify potential treatments and ongoing clinical trials for PPMS and SPMS, and compare their mechanisms of action, efficacy, and side effects with current treatments. METHODS: We reviewed ongoing clinical trials for PPMS and SPMS on the NIH website, as well as articles from PubMed, Embase, and clinicaltrails.gov since 2010. RESULTS: BTKIs like, tolebrutinib, and fenebrutinib are being explored as potential PMS treatments. Vidofludimus calcium, an orally available treatment, has shown a reduction of active and new MRI lesions. Other treatments like simvastatin, N-acetylcysteine (NAC), and alpha-lipoic acid are being explored for their antioxidant properties. AHSCT and mesenchymal stem cell therapy are experimental options for younger patients with high inflammatory activity. CONCLUSIONS: SPMS and PPMS are being studied for new treatments and future trials should consider combination therapies targeting inflammation, demyelination, and neuronal death, as the pathogenesis of PMS involves complex factors.

Peripheral oedema as an adverse effect of treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis with siponimod: A case series.

Siponimod is a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor (S1P) modulator used to treat secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). We report 3 SPMS patients treated with siponimod who developed new or worsening peripheral oedema soon after commencing treatment. In one case, peripheral oedema resulted in immobility. Siponimod-related peripheral oedema deserves wider recognition due to the potential for morbidity and over-investigation. Clinicians should assess for pre-existing oedema and coexisting conditions that may predispose to developing peripheral oedema prior to commencing siponimod.

Spinal Segmental Myoclonus in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis.

Background: A wide variety of associated movement disorders has been described in multiple sclerosis. Phenomenology Shown: A 57-year-old woman with primary progressive multiple sclerosis developed spinal segmental myoclonus associated with focal myelitis. Educational Value: Movement disorders in multiple sclerosis are phenomenologically diverse and have varied pathophysiological mechanisms, making it essential to identify them to initiate appropriate treatment.

Siponimod Attenuates Neuronal Cell Death Triggered by Neuroinflammation via NFκB and Mitochondrial Pathways.

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is the most common autoimmune demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS), consisting of heterogeneous clinical courses varying from relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS), in which disability is linked to bouts of inflammation, to progressive disease such as primary progressive MS (PPMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS), in which neurological disability is thought to be linked to neurodegeneration. As a result, successful therapeutics for progressive MS likely need to have both anti-inflammatory and direct neuroprotective properties. The modulation of sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptors has been implicated in neuroprotection in preclinical animal models. Siponimod/BAF312, the first oral treatment approved for SPMS, may have direct neuroprotective benefits mediated by its activity as a selective (S1P receptor 1) S1P1 and (S1P receptor 5) S1P5 modulator. We showed that S1P1 was mainly present in cortical neurons in lesioned areas of the MS brain. To gain a better understanding of the neuroprotective effects of siponimod in MS, we used both rat neurons and human-induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC)-derived neurons treated with the neuroinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α). Cell survival/apoptotic assays using flow cytometry and IncuCyte live cell analyses showed that siponimod decreased TNF-α induced neuronal cell apoptosis in both rat and human iPSCs. Importantly, a transcriptomic analysis revealed that mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation, NFκB and cytokine signaling pathways contributed to siponimod's neuroprotective effects. Our data suggest that the neuroprotection of siponimod/BAF312 likely involves the relief of oxidative stress in neuronal cells. Further studies are needed to explore the molecular mechanisms of such interactions to determine the relationship between mitochondrial dysfunction and neuroinflammation/neurodegeneration.

Real-world data on siponimod-related lymphopenia among people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Siponimod-related lymphopenia in real-world clinical practice has implications for dose adjustment and infection risk. OBJECTIVE: To characterise siponimod-related lymphopenia in people with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (pwSPMS). METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort of 188 pwSPMS. The development of grade 4 lymphopenia was interrogated with Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Lymphopenia develops soon after commencing siponimod. In total, 15 (8.5%) of 176 experienced grade 4 lymphopenia at 1 month after initiation. There were no clinically significant associations between patient characteristics and development of grade 4 lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: Grade 4 lymphopenia can occur soon after siponimod initiation and cannot be predicted.

Clinical trials for progressive multiple sclerosis: progress, new lessons learned, and remaining challenges.

Despite the success of disease-modifying treatments in relapsing multiple sclerosis, for many individuals living with multiple sclerosis, progressive disability continues to accrue. How to interrupt the complex pathological processes underlying progression remains a daunting and ongoing challenge. Since 2014, several immunomodulatory approaches that have modest but clinically meaningful effects have been approved for the management of progressive multiple sclerosis, primarily for people who have active inflammatory disease. The approval of these drugs required large phase 3 trials that were sufficiently powered to detect meaningful effects on disability. New classes of drug, such as Bruton tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, are coming to the end of their trial stages, several candidate neuroprotective compounds have been successful in phase 2 trials, and innovative approaches to remyelination are now also being explored in clinical trials. Work continues to define intermediate outcomes that can provide results in phase 2 trials more quickly than disability measures, and more efficient trial designs, such as multi-arm multi-stage and futility approaches, are increasingly being used. Collaborations between patient organisations, pharmaceutical companies, and academic researchers will be crucial to ensure that future trials maintain this momentum and generate results that are relevant for people living with progressive multiple sclerosis.

Ibudilast reduces slowly enlarging lesions in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Ibudilast has shown beneficial effects on several imaging outcomes in progressive multiple sclerosis (MS). Slowly enlarging lesions are a proposed imaging biomarker of compartmentalized inflammation within chronic active lesions. OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment effect of ibudilast on slowly enlarging lesion volumes over 96 weeks from a phase II clinical trial of ibudilast (Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis [SPRINT-MS]). METHODS: In total, 255 participants with progressive MS from 28 sites were randomized to oral ibudilast or placebo. Participants with at least four analyzable magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were included. Slowly enlarging lesions were quantified using Jacobian determinant maps. A linear model was used to assess the effect of ibudilast. Magnetization transfer ratio within slowly enlarging lesions was assessed to determine the effect of ibudilast on tissue integrity. RESULTS: In total, 195 participants were included in this analysis. Ibudilast significantly decreased slowly enlarging lesion volume (23%, p = 0.003). Ibudilast also reduced magnetization transfer ratio change in slowly enlarging lesions: 0.22%/year, p = 0.04. CONCLUSION: Ibudilast showed a significant effect on baseline volume of lesions that were slowly enlarging and magnetization transfer ratio in slowly enlarging lesions. The results support the use of slowly enlarging lesions for assessment of compartmentalized inflammation represented by chronic active lesions and provide further support for the neuroprotective effects of ibudilast in progressive MS.

High temperature requirement A1 and macrophage migration inhibitory factor in the cerebrospinal fluid; a potential marker of conversion from relapsing-remitting to secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Predictive and prognostic biomarkers for multiple sclerosis (MS) remain a significant gap in MS diagnosis and treatment monitoring. Currently, there are no timely markers to diagnose the transition to secondary progressive MS (SPMS). OBJECTIVE: This study aims to evaluate the discriminatory potential of the High temperature requirement serine protease (HTRA1)/Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) ratio in distinguishing relapsing-remitting (RRMS) patients from SPMS patients. METHODS: The MIF and HTRA1 CSF levels were determined using ELISA in healthy controls (n = 23), RRMS patients before (n = 22) and after 1 year of dimethyl fumarate treatment (n = 11), as well as in SPMS patients before (n = 11) and after 2 years of mitoxantrone treatment (n = 7). The ability of the HTRA1/MIF ratio to discriminate the different groups was determined using receiver operating curve (ROC) analyses. RESULTS: The ratio was significantly increased in treatment naïve RRMS patients while decreased again in SPMS patients at baseline. Systemic administrated disease modifying treatment (DMT) only significantly affected the ratio in RRMS patients. ROC analysis demonstrated that the ratio could discriminate treatment naïve RRMS patients from SPMS patients with 91% sensitivity and 100% specificity. CONCLUSION: The HTRA1/MIF ratio is a strong candidate as a MS biomarker for SPMS conversion.

Ocrelizumab in highly disabled progressive multiple sclerosis patients.

BACKGROUND: Ocrelizumab is a commonly used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with efficacy in the treatment of both relapsing-remitting (RRMS) and primary progressive (PPMS) multiple sclerosis. Real world use of ocrelizumab in MS patients with higher levels of motor disability requiring a walker or a wheelchair is not well characterized as these populations were excluded from initial studies. Higher levels of disability may be a barrier to treatment access. This study aimed to describe the access to, and tolerability and therapeutic outcomes of ocrelizumab in highly disabled MS patients in a real-world setting. METHODS: As part of an ongoing study of ocrelizumab treatment access, barriers, and outcomes in MS patients at the Brigham MS Center, we retrospectively reviewed all patients with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) of 6.5 or greater at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. All patients were started on ocrelizumab by their treating providers prior to this study initiation. Patients were excluded for recent rituximab exposure, co-treatment with more than one immunosuppressant, or alternative diagnoses contributing to high EDSS. Data was collected on incidence and severity of side effects while on ocrelizumab, persistence of treatment beyond one year, and MS stabilization versus progression while on this treatment. RESULTS: Of the 1219 patients on ocrelizumab between 2017 and 2021, 113 (9.3 %) had EDSS of 6.5 or greater at the time of ocrelizumab initiation. Of the 113, 51 (45.1 %) were excluded: 6 (5.3 %) because they were duplicates or didn't receive ocrelizumab at our center, 25 (22.1 %) due to rituximab treatment in the previous year, 16 (14.2 %) due to lack of at least 1 year of follow up, and 4 (3.5 %) due to relevant comorbidities/treatment with other immunosuppressants. 62 patients were included in the final analysis. At ocrelizumab start, mean age was 62.1 +/- 8.7 years and median EDSS was 7.0 (range 6.5 to 9.5). Ocrelizumab was started in 26 of the included 62 patients (41.9 %) because of objective clinical disease worsening, in 17 (27.4 %) because of subjective worsening, in 8 (12.9 %) to prevent future progression. 32 patients (51.6 %) continued ocrelizumab throughout the study period, with average length of ocrelizumab use of 36.5 +/- 17.0 months. 29 patients (46.8 %) experienced no side effects during the study period. 29 (46.7 %) patients discontinued treatment, and of those, 9 (31.0 %) cited more than one reason for discontinuation: 17 (58.6 %) cited side effects, 12 (41.4 %) cited progression/lack of benefit, 6 (20.7 %) cited the Covid19 pandemic, and 1 (3.4 %) cited financial issues as a reason for discontinuation. Over the course of the study, 16 (25.8 %) patients had disability worsening by EDSS, 5 (8.1 %) had disability improvement, and 41 (66.1 %) remained stable, with a median end EDSS of 7.0 (range 6.5 to 9.5). Importantly, 18 patients (29.0 %) reported subjective disease stability while on ocrelizumab. CONCLUSIONS: Ocrelizumab may lead to disease stabilization in a subset of highly disabled MS patients, but possible benefits need to be carefully balanced against the incidence of adverse events in this high-risk patient population.

The glymphatic system as a potential biomarker and therapeutic target in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a refractory immune-mediated inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, and some cases of the major subtype, relapsing-remitting (RR), transition to secondary progressive (SP). However, the detailed pathogenesis, biomarkers, and effective treatment strategies for secondary progressive multiple sclerosis have not been established. The glymphatic system, which is responsible for waste clearance in the brain, is an intriguing avenue for investigation and is primarily studied through diffusion tensor image analysis along the perivascular space (DTI-ALPS). This study aimed to compare DTI-ALPS indices between patients with RRMS and SPMS to uncover potential differences in their pathologies and evaluate the utility of the glymphatic system as a possible biomarker. METHODS: A cohort of 26 patients with MS (13 RRMS and 13 SPMS) who met specific criteria were enrolled in this prospective study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), including diffusion MRI, 3D T1-weighted imaging, and relaxation time quantification, was conducted. The ALPS index, a measure of glymphatic function, was calculated using diffusion-weighted imaging data. Demographic variables, MRI metrics, and ALPS indices were compared between patients with RRMS and those with SPMS. RESULTS: The ALPS index was significantly lower in the SPMS group. Patients with SPMS exhibited longer disease duration and higher Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores than those with RRMS. Despite these differences, the correlations between the EDSS score, disease duration, and ALPS index were minimal, suggesting that the impact of these clinical variables on ALPS index variations was negligible. DISCUSSION: Our study revealed the potential microstructural and functional differences between RRMS and SPMS related to glymphatic system impairment. Although disease severity and duration vary among subtypes, their influence on ALPS index differences appears to be limited. This highlights the stronger association between SP conversion and changes in the ALPS index. These findings align with those of previous research, indicating the involvement of the glymphatic system in the progression of MS. CONCLUSION: Although the causality remains uncertain, our study suggests that a reduced ALPS index, reflecting glymphatic system dysfunction, may contribute to MS progression, particularly in SPMS. This suggests the potential of the ALPS index as a diagnostic biomarker for SPMS and underscores the potential of the glymphatic system as a therapeutic target to mitigate MS progression. Future studies with larger cohorts and pathological validation are necessary to confirm these findings. This study provides new insights into the pathogenesis of SPMS and the potential for innovative therapeutic strategies.

Clinical characterization of long-term multiple sclerosis (COLuMbus) patients in Argentina: A cross-sectional non-interventional study.

BACKGROUND: Most Multiple Sclerosis (MS) clinical trials fail to assess the long-term effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMT) or disability. METHODS: COLuMbus was a single-visit, cross-sectional study in Argentina in adult patients with ≥10 years of MS since first diagnosis. The primary endpoint was to determine patient disability using the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS). The secondary endpoints were to evaluate the distribution of diagnoses between relapsing-remitting MS (RRMS) and secondary progressive MS (SPMS), patient demographics, disease history, and the risk of disability progression. The relationship between baseline characteristics and the current disability state and the risk of disability progression was assessed. RESULTS: Out of the 210 patients included, 76.7 % had a diagnosis of RRMS and 23.3 % had been diagnosed with SPMS, with a mean disease duration of 17.9 years and 20.5 years, respectively. The mean delay in the initial MS diagnosis was 2.6 years for the RRMS subgroup and 2.8 years for the SPMS subgroups. At the time of cut-off (28May2020), 90.1 % (RRMS) and 75.5 % (SPMS) of patients were receiving a DMT, with a mean of 1.5 and 2.0 prior DMTs, respectively. The median EDSS scores were 2.5 (RRMS) and 6.5 (SPMS). In the RRMS and SPMS subgroups, 23 % and 95.9 % of patients were at high risk of disability, respectively; the time since first diagnosis showed a significant correlation with the degree of disability. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first local real-world study in patients with long-term MS that highlights the importance of recognizing early disease progression to treat the disease on time and delay disability.

Patient-reported outcome parameters and disability worsening in progressive multiple sclerosis.

OBJECTIVES: Detection and prediction of disability progression is a significant unmet need in people with progressive multiple sclerosis (PwPMS). Government and health agencies have deemed the use of patient-reported outcomes measurements (PROMs) in clinical practice and clinical trials a major strategic priority. Nevertheless, data documenting the clinical utility of PROMs in neurological diseases is scarce. This study evaluates if assessment of PROMs could track progression in PwPMS. METHODS: Emerging blood Biomarkers in Progressive Multiple Sclerosis (EmBioProMS) investigated PROMs (Beck depression inventory-II (BDI-II), multiple sclerosis impact scale-29 (MSIS-29), fatigue scale for motor and cognition (FSMC)) in PwPMS (primary [PPMS] and secondary progressive MS [SPMS]). PROMs were evaluated longitudinally and compared between participants with disability progression (at baseline; retrospective evidence of disability progression (EDP), and during follow up (FU); prospective evidence of confirmed disability progression (CDP)) and those without progression. In an independent cohort of placebo participants of the phase III ORATORIO trial in PPMS, the diagnostic and prognostic value of another PROMs score (36-Item Short Form Survey [SF-36]) regarding CDP was evaluated. RESULTS: EmBioProMS participants with EDP in the two years prior to inclusion (n = 136/227), or who suffered from CDP during FU (number of events= 88) had worse BDI-II, MSIS-29, and FSMC scores compared to PwPMS without progression. In addition, baseline MSIS29physical above 70th, 80th, and 90th percentiles predicted future CDP/ progression independent of relapse activity in EmBioProMS PPMS participants (HR of 3.7, 6.9, 6.7, p = 0.002, <0.001, and 0.001, respectively). In the placebo arm of ORATORIO (n = 137), the physical component score (PCS) of SF-36 worsened at week 120 compared to baseline, in cases who experienced progression over the preceding trial period (P = 0.018). Worse PCS at baseline was associated with higher hazard ratios of disability accumulation over the subsequent 120 weeks (HR: 2.01 [30th-], 2.11 [20th-], and 2.8 [10th percentile], P = 0.007, 0.012 and 0.005, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: PROMs could provide additional, practical, cost-efficient, and remotely accessible insight about disability progression in PMS through standardized, structured, and quantifiable patient feedback.

Serum macrophage migration inhibitory factor levels predict brain atrophy in people with primary progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) is a cytokine linked to multiple sclerosis (MS) progression that is thought to be inhibited by ibudilast. SPRINT-MS was a phase 2 placebo-controlled trial of ibudilast in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). OBJECTIVE: To determine whether baseline MIF levels predict imaging outcomes and assess the effects of ibudilast on serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) MIF levels in people with PMS treated with ibudilast. METHODS: Participants in the SPRINT-MS trial were treated with either ibudilast or placebo and underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) every 24 weeks over a duration of 96 weeks. MIF was measured in serum and CSF. RESULTS: MIF levels were compared with imaging outcomes in 223 participants from the SPRINT-MS study. In the primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) cohort, males had higher serum (p < 0.001) and CSF (p = 0.01) MIF levels, as compared with females. Higher baseline serum MIF levels in PPMS were associated with faster brain atrophy (beta = -0.113%, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.204% to -0.021%; p = 0.016). These findings were not observed in secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (SPMS). Ibudilast did not affect either serum or CSF MIF levels. CONCLUSIONS: Serum MIF levels were associated with male sex and predicted brain atrophy in PPMS, but not SPMS. Ibudilast did not demonstrate an effect on MIF levels, as compared with placebo, although we cannot exclude a functional effect.

Disease-modifying treatment, long-term outcomes and transition to progressive multiple sclerosis: data based on the New York State MS Consortium.

BACKGROUND: The impact of disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) on multiple sclerosis (MS) long-term outcomes is continuously evolving. Retrospective analyses of large and long-term registries could provide information regarding general disease trajectories and risk factors that are commonly not investigated in shorter clinical trial settings. METHODS: Retrospective observational study of people with MS (pwMS) registered in New York State MS Consortium (NYSMSC) since 1996. Disability outcomes of reaching sustained Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores of 4.0, 6.0 and transition to secondary-progressive MS (SPMS) were confirmed at follow-up. Four DMT categories were determined (1) continuous DMT use, (2) discontinued DMT, (3) (re)started DMT and (4) never treated with DMT. Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) were acquired using LIFEware system. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and adjusted analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) were used to determine the rate and factors related to disability progression. RESULTS: Total of 1893 pwMS were included with baseline average age of 43.2 years (SD = 10.4), 9.6 years of disease duration (SD = 8.8), median EDSS of 3.0 (IQR 2.0-3.5) and average follow-up time of 6.9 years (SD = 4.9). In addition to being male, older, more disabled and reporting worse PROs at baseline, pwMS who discontinued DMT had more than 5.5 times greater risk of reaching sustained EDSS of 4.0 (OR = 5.56, 95% CI 2.78-11.0, p < 0.001). Similarly, pwMS who discontinued DMT during the NYSMSC follow-up had 3.8- and 4.7-times greater risk to reach sustained EDSS 6.0 (OR = 3.86, 95% CI 2.12-7.02, p < 0.001), and to transition to SPMS (OR = 4.77, 95% CI 2.9-7.87, p < 0.001). Propensity matching analysis confirmed the worse clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In addition to known predictors of long-term clinical outcomes, pwMS who discontinue DMT have worse long-term disability trajectory when compared to both early and late DMT starters. PRO-based indicators may suggest worse clinical outcomes.

Ocrelizumab Extended Interval Dosing in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis: An Italian Experience.

BACKGROUND: The intervals between two courses of anti CD20 therapies in the COVID19 pandemic era provided the opportunity to individually delay therapy, known as extended interval dosing (EID). METHODS: We collect real-world data on patients with primary progressive MS (PPMS) treated with Ocrelizumab (OCR) during the COVID'19 pandemic. The observation period in which the standard interval dosing (SID) or EID occurred (always a maintenance cycle, 600 mg) was from January 2020 to June 2021. All patients had two infusions during the observation period. Our first aim was to compare confirmed disability progression (CDP) between SID and EID patients. RESULTS: From a total cohort of 410 patients treated with OCR, 96 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. All patients received two infusions during the index window, 71 received only SID infusions whilst 25 received at least one EID infusion throughout the entire follow-up. During the entire available follow-up (median 10 months, IQR 7-11), CDP was recorded in 5 patients (3/71, 4.2% SID and 2/25, 8% EID, V-Cramer = 0.141, p-value = 0.167). EID regimen did not influence the risk of CDP during the investigated follow up. CONCLUSION: In our multicentre real-world cohort, the EID regimen in PPMS patients did not result in increased CDP during the available follow-up.

Treatment reduces the incidence of newly appearing multiple sclerosis lesions evolving into chronic active, slowly expanding lesions: A retrospective analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Newly appearing lesions in multiple sclerosis (MS) may evolve into chronically active, slowly expanding lesions (SELs), leading to sustained disability progression. The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence of newly appearing lesions developing into SELs, and their correlation to clinical evolution and treatment. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of a fingolimod trial in primary progressive MS (PPMS; INFORMS, NCT00731692) was undertaken. Data were available from 324 patients with magnetic resonance imaging scans up to 3 years after screening. New lesions at year 1 were identified with convolutional neural networks, and SELs obtained through a deformation-based method. Clinical disability was assessed annually by Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Nine-Hole Peg Test, Timed 25-Foot Walk, and Paced Auditory Serial Addition Test. Linear, logistic, and mixed-effect models were used to assess the relationship between the Jacobian expansion in new lesions and SELs, disability scores, and treatment status. RESULTS: One hundred seventy patients had ≥1 new lesions at year 1 and had a higher lesion count at screening compared to patients with no new lesions (median = 27 vs. 22, p = 0.007). Among the new lesions (median = 2 per patient), 37% evolved into definite or possible SELs. Higher SEL volume and count were associated with EDSS worsening and confirmed disability progression. Treated patients had lower volume and count of definite SELs (ß = -0.04, 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.07 to -0.01, p = 0.015; ß = -0.36, 95% CI = -0.67 to -0.06, p = 0.019, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Incident chronic active lesions are common in PPMS, and fingolimod treatment can reduce their number.

Evaluation of drivers of treatment switch in relapsing multiple sclerosis: a study from the Italian MS Registry.

BACKGROUND: Active relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) multiple sclerosis (MS) are currently defined as "relapsing MS" (RMS). The aim of this cross-sectional study was to assess drivers of treatment switches due to clinical relapses in a population of RMS patients collected in the Italian MS and Related Disorders Register (I-MS&RD). METHODS: RRMS and SPMS patients with at least one relapse in a time window of 2 years before of data extraction were defined as RMS. Factors associated with disease-modifying therapy (DMT) switching due to clinical activity were assessed through multivariable logistic regression models in which treatment exposure was included as the last recorded DMT and the last DMT's class [moderate-efficacy (ME), high-efficacy (HE) DMTs and anti-CD20 drugs]. RESULTS: A cohort of 4739 RMS patients (4161 RRMS, 578 SPMS) was extracted from the I-MS&RD. A total of 2694 patients switching DMTs due to relapses were identified. Switchers were significantly (p < 0.0001) younger, less disabled, more frequently affected by an RR disease course in comparison to non-switcher patients. The multivariable logistic regression models showed that Alemtuzumab (OR 0.08, 95% CI 0.02-0.37), Natalizumab (0.48, 0.30-0.76), Ocrelizumab (0.1, 0.02-0.45) and Rituximab (0.23, 0.06-0.82) exposure was a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses. Moreover, the use of HE DMTs (0.43, 0.31-0.59), especially anti-CD20 drugs (0.14, 0.05-0.37), resulted to be a protective factor against treatment switch due to relapses in comparison with ME DMTs. CONCLUSIONS: More than 50% of RMS switched therapy due to disease activity. HE DMTs, especially anti-CD20 drugs, significantly reduce the risk of treatment switch.

Toward identifying key mechanisms of progression in multiple sclerosis.

A major therapeutic goal in the treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is to prevent the accumulation of disability over an often decades-long disease course. Disability progression can result from acute relapses as well as from CNS intrinsic parenchymal disintegration without de novo CNS lesion formation. Research focus has shifted to progression not associated with acute inflammation, as it is not sufficiently controlled by currently available treatments. This review outlines how recent advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of progressive MS have been facilitated by the development of more precise, less static pathogenetic concepts of progressive MS, as well as by new techniques for the analysis of region-specific proteomic and transcriptomic signatures in the human CNS. We highlight key drivers of MS disease progression and potential targets in its treatment.

The effect of ibudilast on thalamic volume in progressive multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Thalamic volume loss is known to be associated with clinical and cognitive disability in progressive multiple sclerosis (PMS). OBJECTIVE: To investigate the treatment effect of ibudilast on thalamic atrophy more than 96 weeks in the phase 2 trial in progressive(MS Secondary and Primary Progressive Ibudilast NeuroNEXT Trial in Multiple Sclerosis [SPRINT-MS]). METHODS: A total of 231 participants were randomized to either ibudilast (n = 114) or placebo (n = 117). Thalamic volume change was computed using Bayesian Sequence Adaptive Multimodal Segmentation tool (SAMseg) incorporating T1, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and fractional anisotropy maps and analyzed with a mixed-effects repeated-measures model. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in thalamic volumes between treatment groups. On exploratory analysis, participants with primary progressive multiple sclerosis (PPMS) on placebo had a 0.004% greater rate of thalamic atrophy than PPMS participants on ibudilast (p = 0.058, 95% confidence interval (CI) = -0.008 to <0.001). Greater reductions in thalamic volumes at more than 96 weeks were associated with worsening multiple sclerosis functional composite (MSFC-4) scores (p = 0.002) and worsening performance on the symbol digit modality test (SDMT) (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In a phase 2 trial evaluating ibudilast in PMS, no treatment effect was demonstrated in preventing thalamic atrophy. Participants with PPMS exhibited a treatment effect that trended toward significance. Longitudinal changes in thalamic volume were related to worsening of physical and cognitive disability, highlighting this outcome's clinical importance.