Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 440
Filter
1.
JAMA Surg ; 156(8): e212058, 2021 08 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34076684

ABSTRACT

Importance: Short- and long-term functional impairment after pediatric injury may be more sensitive for measuring quality of care compared with mortality alone. The characteristics of injured children and adolescents who are at the highest risk for functional impairment are unknown. Objective: To evaluate categories of injuries associated with higher prevalence of impaired functional status at hospital discharge among children and adolescents and to estimate the number of those with injuries in these categories who received treatment at pediatric trauma centers. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study (Assessment of Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life After Pediatric Trauma) included children and adolescents younger than 15 years who were hospitalized with at least 1 serious injury at 1 of 7 level 1 pediatric trauma centers from March 2018 to February 2020. Exposure: At least 1 serious injury (Abbreviated Injury Scale score, ≥3 [scores range from 1 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe injury]) classified into 9 categories based on the body region injured and the presence of a severe traumatic brain injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score <9 or Glasgow Coma Scale motor score <5). Main Outcomes and Measures: New domain morbidity defined as a 2 points or more change in any of 6 domains (mental status, sensory, communication, motor function, feeding, and respiratory) measured using the Functional Status Scale (FSS) (scores range from 1 [normal] to 5 [very severe dysfunction] for each domain) in each injury category at hospital discharge. The estimated prevalence of impairment associated with each injury category was assessed in the population of seriously injured children and adolescents treated at participating sites. Results: This study included a sample of 427 injured children and adolescents (271 [63.5%] male; median age, 7.2 years [interquartile range, 2.5-11.7 years]), 74 (17.3%) of whom had new FSS domain morbidity at discharge. The proportion of new FSS domain morbidity was highest among those with multiple injured body regions and severe head injury (20 of 24 [83.3%]) and lowest among those with an isolated head injury of mild or moderate severity (1 of 84 [1.2%]). After adjusting for oversampling of specific injuries in the study sample, 749 of 5195 seriously injured children and adolescents (14.4%) were estimated to have functional impairment at hospital discharge. Children and adolescents with extremity injuries (302 of 749 [40.3%]) and those with severe traumatic brain injuries (258 of 749 [34.4%]) comprised the largest proportions of those estimated to have impairment at discharge. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study, most injured children and adolescents returned to baseline functional status by hospital discharge. These findings suggest that functional status assessments can be limited to cohorts of injured children and adolescents at the highest risk for impairment.


Subject(s)
Abdominal Injuries/complications , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/complications , Extremities/injuries , Multiple Trauma/complications , Spinal Injuries/complications , Thoracic Injuries/complications , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Abdominal Injuries/classification , Adolescent , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/classification , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Glasgow Coma Scale , Humans , Infant , Male , Multiple Trauma/classification , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Patient Discharge , Physical Functional Performance , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Spinal Injuries/classification , Thoracic Injuries/classification , Trauma Centers
2.
Eur J Med Res ; 26(1): 35, 2021 Apr 15.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33858510

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) and Injury Severity Score (ISS) are widely used to assess trauma patients. In this study, the interobserver variability of the injury severity assessment for severely injured patients was analyzed based on different injured anatomical regions, and the various demographic backgrounds of the observers. METHODS: A standardized questionnaire was presented to surgical experts and participants of clinical polytrauma courses. It contained medical information and initial X-rays/CT-scans of 10 cases of severely injured patients. Participants estimated the severity of each injury based on the AIS. Interobserver variability for the AIS, ISS, and New Injury Severity Score (NISS) was calculated by employing the statistical method of Krippendorff's α coefficient. RESULTS: Overall, 54 participants were included. The major contributing medical specialties were orthopedic trauma surgery (N = 36, 67%) and general surgery (N = 13, 24%). The measured interobserver variability in the assessment of the overall injury severity was high (α ISS: 0.33 / α NISS: 0.23). Moreover, there were differences in the interobserver variability of the maximum AIS (MAIS) depending on the anatomical region: αhead and neck: 0.06, αthorax: 0.45, αabdomen: 0.27 and αextremities: 0.55. CONCLUSIONS: Interobserver agreement concerning injury severity assessment appears to be low among clinicians. We also noted marked differences in variability according to injury anatomy. The study shows that the assessment of injury severity is also highly variable between experts in the field. This implies the need for appropriate education to improve the accuracy of trauma evaluation in the respective trauma registries.


Subject(s)
Abbreviated Injury Scale , Injury Severity Score , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Observer Variation , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Female , Germany/epidemiology , Humans , Male , Multiple Trauma/classification , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data , Wounds and Injuries/classification
3.
Rev. guatemalteca cir ; 27(1): 38-42, 2021. tab
Article in Spanish | LILACS, LIGCSA | ID: biblio-1372281

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivos: Las simulaciones han sido una estrategia que se ha desarrollado para prevenir los errores médicos ya que proporcionan un ambiente seguro para el aprendizaje, donde los errores no son fatales. Triaje se define como la clasificación de pacientes según la severidad de sus lesiones con el propósito de salvar la mayor cantidad de vidas con los recursos disponibles. El objetivo del estudio es determinar si las simulaciones de pacientes politraumatizados mejoran el conocimiento y criterio de aplicación de triaje. Métodos: Este fué un estudio descriptivo prospectivo donde se realizó un examen antes y al finalizar las simulaciones de pacientes politraumatizados. esultados: El puntaje promedio fue de 50.73 y 59.44 antes y después de la simulaciones espectivamente. El 53 % de los pacientes fueron sobreclasificados, el 40% fue clasificado correctamente y el 6% fueron subclasificados en el examen previo a las simulaciones, el 40% de los pacientes fue sobreclasificado y el 60% fue clasificado correctamente en el examen al finalizar las simulaciones. Discusión: Aunque se presentó un escenario con todos los recursos necesarios, los estudiantes analizaron los casos en base a la realidad de Guatemala, por lo que sobre clasificaron a los pacientes. Sin embargo, se evidenció una mejoría en el puntaje y en la correcta clasificación de los pacientes. (AU)


Introduction and objectives: Simulations have been developed as a strategy to prevent medical errors, because they provide a safe environment to learn from mistakes and the mistakes are not fatal. Triage is defined as the classification of patients according to the severity of their injuries in order to save as many lives with the available resources. The objective of the study is to determine if simulations of polytraumatized patients improve the knowledge and criteria of triage application. Methods: This was a prospective descriptive study where a test was performed before and at the end of the simulations of solytraumatized patients. Results: The average results were 50.73 and 59.44 before and after the simulations respectively. They overclassified 53% of the patients, 40% was correctly classified and 6% were subclassified in the pre-simulation test, in the test at the end of the simulations 40% were overclassified and 60% were correctly classified. Discussion: Although the scenario was presented with all the necessary resources, the students analyzed the cases based on the reality of Guatemala, so they had the tendency to over-classified the patients. However, there was an improvement in the score and in the correct classification of patients. (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Students, Medical , Multiple Trauma/classification , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Triage/methods , Simulation Exercise , Education, Medical, Undergraduate , Disaster Emergencies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Prospective Studies
4.
Sports Med Arthrosc Rev ; 28(3): 100-109, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32740462

ABSTRACT

The multiple ligament injured knee is a complex problem in orthopedic surgery. These injuries may or may not present as acute knee dislocations, and careful assessment of the extremity vascular and neurological status is essential because of the possibility of arterial and/or venous compromise, and nerve injury. These complex injuries require a systematic approach to evaluation and treatment. Physical examination and imaging studies enable the surgeon to make a correct diagnosis and formulate a treatment plan. Knee stability is improved postoperatively when evaluated with knee ligament rating scales, arthrometer testing, and stress radiographic analysis. Surgical timing depends upon the injured ligaments, vascular status of the extremity, reduction stability, and the overall health of the patient. The use of allograft tissue is preferred because of the strength of these large grafts, and the absence of donor site morbidity.


Subject(s)
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries/surgery , Medial Collateral Ligament, Knee/injuries , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods , Posterior Cruciate Ligament/injuries , Achilles Tendon/transplantation , Humans , Joint Instability/surgery , Knee Dislocation/diagnosis , Knee Dislocation/etiology , Knee Dislocation/therapy , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/etiology , Physical Examination , Popliteal Artery/injuries , Posterior Cruciate Ligament/surgery , Time-to-Treatment , Treatment Outcome
5.
Facial Plast Surg Aesthet Med ; 22(4): 249-254, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250646

ABSTRACT

Importance: The nasal bone is one of the most commonly fractured bones of the midface. However, the frequency of coincident fractures of adjacent bones such as the frontal process of the maxillary bone, nasal septum, and medial or inferior orbital walls has not been fully evaluated. Objective: The purpose of this study was to investigate the incidence of fractures of adjacent structures in the setting of a nasal bone fracture. Second, we propose a new classification system of nasal bone fractures with involvement of adjacent bony structures. Design, Setting, and Participants: One thousand, one hundred ninety-three patients with midfacial fractures were retrospectively reviewed. The characteristics of fractures of the nasal bone and the incidence of coincident fractures of the frontal process of maxilla, bony nasal septum, medial, or inferior orbital walls were analyzed. Exposure: All patients included in the study presented with nasal trauma. Main Outcomes and Measures: The coincident fractures of adjacent midfacial structures were assessed, and a new classification of midfacial fractures based on computed tomography (CT) scan images was proposed. Results: Among the 1193 cases, bilateral fractures of the nasal bone were most common (69.24%), and coexistent fracture of the frontal process of the maxilla and bony nasal septum was 66.89% and 42.25%, respectively. Coincident fracture of the orbital walls was observed in 16.51% of cases. The major etiology of fracture for the younger and elderly groups was falls, compared with assault as the most common etiology in the adult group. A classification scheme was generated in which fractures of the nasal bone were divided into five types depending on coexisting fractures of adjacent structures. Conclusions and Relevance: External force applied to the nasal bone can also lead to coexistent fracture of adjacent bony structures including the frontal process of the maxilla, nasal septum, and orbital walls. The proposed classification of nasal fracture based on CT imaging helps to incorporate coincident disruption of adjacent structures.


Subject(s)
Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Nasal Bone/injuries , Skull Fractures/diagnosis , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Maxillary Fractures/classification , Maxillary Fractures/diagnosis , Maxillary Fractures/epidemiology , Maxillary Fractures/etiology , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Multiple Trauma/etiology , Nasal Septum/injuries , Orbital Fractures/classification , Orbital Fractures/diagnosis , Orbital Fractures/epidemiology , Orbital Fractures/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Skull Fractures/classification , Skull Fractures/epidemiology , Skull Fractures/etiology , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Trauma Severity Indices , Young Adult
6.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32023934

ABSTRACT

Injury is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in the paediatric population and exhibits complex injury patterns. This study aimed to identify homogeneous groups of paediatric major trauma patients based on their profile of injury for use in mortality and functional outcomes risk-adjusted models. Data were extracted from the population-based Victorian State Trauma Registry for patients aged 0-15 years, injured 2006-2016. Four Latent Class Analysis (LCA) models with/without covariates of age/sex tested up to six possible latent classes. Five risk-adjusted models of in-hospital mortality and 6-month functional outcomes incorporated a combination of Injury Severity Score (ISS), New ISS (NISS), and LCA classes. LCA models replicated the best log-likelihood and entropy > 0.8 for all models (N = 1281). Four latent injury classes were identified: isolated head; isolated abdominal organ; multi-trauma injuries, and other injuries. The best models, in terms of goodness of fit statistics and model diagnostics, included the LCA classes and NISS. The identification of isolated head, isolated abdominal, multi-trauma and other injuries as key latent paediatric injury classes highlights areas for emphasis in planning prevention initiatives and paediatric trauma system development. Future risk-adjusted paediatric injury models that include these injury classes with the NISS when evaluating mortality and functional outcomes is recommended.


Subject(s)
Hospital Mortality/trends , Multiple Trauma , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Abdominal Injuries , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Injury Severity Score , Male , Models, Statistical , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Severity Indices , Wounds and Injuries/therapy
7.
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg ; 46(4): 903-911, 2020 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30535521

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The AIS scale is a measurement tool for single injuries. The ISS is considered the gold standard for determining the severity of injured patients, and the NISS was developed to improve the ISS with respect to loss of information, as well as to facilitate its calculation. The aim of this study was to analyse what injury severity measure, calculated according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS), 1998 and 2005 (update 2008) versions, performs better with mortality, cost and hospital length of stay healthcare indicators. METHODS: This cross-sectional observational study was carried out between February 1st 2012 and February 1st 2013. Inclusion criteria were injured patients due to external causes admitted to trauma service through the emergency department. Manual coding of all injuries was performed and ISS and NISS scores were calculated for both versions of the AIS scale. Severity was then compared to mortality (in-hospital and at 30 days), healthcare cost, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: The index with the best predictive capability for in-hospital mortality was NISS 05 (AUC = 0.811). There was a significant increase in hospital stay and healthcare cost in the most severe patients in all indexes, except for ISS 05. CONCLUSIONS: NISS is found to be an index with higher predictive capability for in-hospital mortality and correlates better to length of hospital stay and healthcare cost.


Subject(s)
Injury Severity Score , Multiple Trauma/classification , Abbreviated Injury Scale , Adult , Aged , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Health Care Costs , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Predictive Value of Tests , Spain
8.
J Surg Res ; 244: 521-527, 2019 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336245

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Data accuracy is essential to obtaining correct results and making appropriate conclusions in outcomes research. Few have examined the quality of data that is used in studies involving orthopedic surgery. A nonspecific data entry has the potential to affect the results of a study or the ability to appropriately risk adjust for treatments and outcomes. This study evaluated the proportion of Not Further Specified (NFS) orthopedic injury codes found into two large trauma registries. MATERIALS: Data from the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2011 to 2015 and from the Michigan Trauma Quality Improvement Program (MTQIP) 2011-2017 were used. We selected multiple orthopedic injuries classified via the Abbreviated Injury Scale, version 2005 (AIS2005) and calculated the percentage of NFS entries for each specific injury. RESULTS: There were a substantial proportion of fractures classified as NFS in each registry, 18.5% (range 2.4%-67.9%) in MTQIP and 27% (range 6.0%-68.5%) in the NTDB. There were significantly more NFS entries when the fractures were complex versus simple in both MTQIP (34.5% versus 9.6%, P < 0.001) and the NTDB (41.8% versus 15.7%, P < 0.001). The level of trauma center affected the proportion of NFS codes differently between the registries. CONCLUSIONS: The proportion of nonspecific entries in these two large trauma registries is concerning. These data can affect the results and conclusions from research studies as well as impact our ability to truly risk adjust for treatments and outcomes. Further studies should explore the reasons for these findings.


Subject(s)
Fractures, Bone/epidemiology , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , Registries , Fractures, Bone/classification , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Humans , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Orthopedic Procedures , Specialties, Surgical
9.
Ann Emerg Med ; 74(5): 697-705, 2019 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30982628

ABSTRACT

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The latest wave of terrorism worldwide has seen significant use by terrorists of mundane, "low-technology" weapons, such as utility knives and civilian vehicles. How do the injuries they produce compare with that of more conventional terrorism mechanisms, such as use of firearms and explosives? We compare injury patterns of the most frequent terrorism-related injury mechanisms in an Israeli data set. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of 1,858 patients hospitalized because of terrorism events, which were recorded in the Israeli National Trauma Registry between January 1997 and December 2016. The events were divided into 4 groups based on weapon used: explosions, shootings, stabbings, and vehicular attacks. The groups were compared in terms of injuries sustained, use of hospital resources, and clinical outcomes. RESULTS: Explosion-related and vehicular terrorism resulted in a higher proportion of multiple injuries, whereas stabbings and shootings mostly led to isolated injuries. Victims of vehicular attacks had a high proportion of severe head injuries, whereas stabbing victims had a high volume of vascular injuries. All mechanisms involved significant damage to extremities; however, among stabbing victims injury was mainly to the upper extremities, whereas among vehicular attack victims it was mostly to the lower extremities. The overall injury severity of the compared groups was similar, leading to comparable levels of intensive care use and inhospital mortality. Certain similarities in victims' characteristics were observed between the shootings and stabbings and between explosions and vehicular attacks. CONCLUSION: Despite differences between various terrorist attack mechanisms, the resulting injury severity and inhospital mortality are very similar, with stabbings and vehicular attacks causing injuries as serious as those caused by conventional weapons.


Subject(s)
Automobiles/statistics & numerical data , Blast Injuries/epidemiology , Explosions/statistics & numerical data , Multiple Trauma/classification , Terrorism , Wounds, Penetrating/epidemiology , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Terrorism/classification
10.
World J Emerg Surg ; 14: 13, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30923559

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: According to recently published findings, levels of the soluble receptor of advanced glycation end products (sRAGE) and its clearance from the blood may reflect the evolution of lung damage during hospitalization. Thus, the objective of this study was to reveal the course of sRAGE levels over the first three posttraumatic weeks, focusing on the severity of thoracic trauma and the development of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and/or pneumonia. METHODS: Twenty-eight consecutive surviving polytraumatized patients suffering thoracic trauma, age ≥ 18 years, Injury Severity Score ≥ 16, and directly admitted to our level I trauma center were enrolled in this prospective study. Blood samples were taken initially and on days 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, and 21 during hospitalization. Luminex multi-analyte-technology was used for biomarker analysis. RESULTS: Common to all our patients was an almost continuous decline of sRAGE levels within the first five posttraumatic days. Day 0 levels in polytrauma victims with severe thoracic trauma were more than twice as high than in those suffering mild thoracic trauma (p = 0.035), whereas the difference between the two groups did not reach significance from day 1. Neither the development of ARDS and/or pneumonia nor the necessity of secondary surgery did result in significant differences in sRAGE levels between the subgroups with and without the particular complication at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: sRAGE levels assessed immediately after hospital admission might serve as a diagnostic marker for the vehemence of impacts against the chest and thus might be applied as an additional tool in diagnosis, risk evaluation, and choice of the appropriate treatment strategy of polytraumatized patients in routine clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Glycation End Products, Advanced/analysis , Multiple Trauma/classification , Time Factors , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers/analysis , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Glycation End Products, Advanced/blood , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Lung/abnormalities , Lung/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Predictive Value of Tests , Prospective Studies , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/diagnosis , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/physiopathology , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/prevention & control , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data
11.
Bol. pediatr ; 59(247): 61-67, 2019. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-183168

ABSTRACT

El trauma pediátrico es la principal causa de mortalidad en el paciente pediátrico, pero a pesar de esto sigue siendo mucho menor su incidencia respecto al trauma adulto. en el pasado la atención se limitaba a extrapolar los conocimientos adquiridos en el adulto para atender a los niños, pero gracias a importantes campañas de concienciación y prevención se han desarrollado sistemas protocolizados de atención al paciente pediátrico específicos. El objetivo de esta revisión es dar una visión global sobre el estado actual de la atención al paciente politraumatizado, haciendo especial hincapié en las actualizaciones y particularidades de este grupo de edad


Pediatric trauma is the leading cause of mortality in children, but it comprises a almost insignificant part of the overall politraumatic events in the hole population. pediatric attention used to be a copy of the well-developed adult trauma protocols, but, thanks to a great concienciation campaigns carry on for the governments specific pediatric trauma scores and protocols has been developed. the aim of this review is to provide a global overview of the current-state in this issue as well as to emphasize on pediatric particularities and actualizations


Subject(s)
Humans , Child , Fractures, Multiple/classification , Fractures, Multiple/therapy , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Glasgow Outcome Scale , Trauma Severity Indices
12.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 156(4): 443-448, 2018 08.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29895090

ABSTRACT

Fractures of the scapula are rare and have an incidence of 1% of all fractures. Publications highlight glenoid rim fractures. Classification by Ideberg and Euler and Rüdi are accepted. Euler and Rüdi describe three extra-articular and two intra-articular fracture patterns. The indications for surgery are displaced glenoid fractures, scapula tilt of more than 40° and injuries to the superior shoulder suspensory complex. We describe a case of a 22 year old man, who while cycling collided with a moving car due to wet roads. After his admission to hospital as a polytraumatised patient, the trauma CT-Scan showed haemothorax with several associated rip fractures, displaced humeral shaft fracture and fractures of the acromion and glenoid, classified as type D2c according to Euler and Rüdi. Following damage control principles, drainage of the haemothorax was already performed in the ER and surgical treatment of the displaced humeral shaft fracture was performed on the day of admission. No peripheral neurological deficits were evident. After pulmonary stabilisation, surgery was performed 6 days later on the glenoid and acromion fracture, which in conjunction may be regarded as an injury to the superior shoulder suspensory complex. We performed an arthroscopically-assisted screw fixation of the glenoid fracture (type D2c according to Euler and Rüdi) and an ORIF procedure at the acromion. Postoperative rehabilitation was performed with passive abduction and elevation up to 90° for the first two weeks and active abduction an elevation up to 90° for weeks 3 to 6. Full ROM was allowed at week 7. CONCLUSION: Articular fractures of the glenoid are rare and mainly seen as rim fractures. The indications for surgery are displaced articular fractures and injury to the superior shoulder suspensory complex. As demonstrated by this article, type D2c fractures according to Euler and Rüdi can be treated effectively as an arthroscopically-assisted screw fixation procedure.


Subject(s)
Arthroscopy/methods , Athletic Injuries/surgery , Bicycling/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures , Scapula/injuries , Shoulder Fractures/surgery , Accidents, Traffic , Acromion/diagnostic imaging , Acromion/injuries , Acromion/surgery , Athletic Injuries/classification , Athletic Injuries/diagnostic imaging , Bone Screws , Fracture Fixation, Internal/instrumentation , Glenoid Cavity/diagnostic imaging , Glenoid Cavity/injuries , Glenoid Cavity/surgery , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Male , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnostic imaging , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Scapula/diagnostic imaging , Scapula/surgery , Shoulder Fractures/classification , Shoulder Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed , Young Adult
13.
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique ; 66(1): 43-52, 2018 Feb.
Article in French | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29221606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Resource allocation to hospitals is highly dependent on appropriate case coding. For trauma victims, the major diagnosis-coding category (DCC) is multiple trauma (DCC26), which triggers higher funding. We hypothesized that DCC26 has limited capacity for appropriate identification of severe trauma victims. METHODS: We studied Injury Severity Score (ISS), Trauma Related Injury Severity Score (TRISS) and in-hospital mortality using data recorded in three level 1 trauma centers over a 2-year period. Patients were divided into two groups: DCC26 and non-DCC26. For non-DCC26 patients, two subgroups were identified: patients with severe head trauma and patients with spinal trauma. Clinical endpoints were mortality, ISS>15 and TRISS, IGS II. Use of hospital resources was estimated using funding and expenditures associated with each patient. RESULTS: During the study period, 2570 trauma victims were included in the analysis. These patients were 39±18 years old, with median ISS=14, and observed mortality=10 %. Group DCC26 had 811 (31 %) patients, group non-DCC26 1855 (69 %) patients. DCC26 coding identified a more severely injured group of patients. However, in the group non-DCC26, there was a high proportion of severe trauma (ISS>15: 35 %; TRISS<0.95: 9 %). CONCLUSION: DCC26 is not an appropriate coding for severe trauma patients. For these patients, expenditures will include intensive care and rare and costly resources. We propose to take into account the TRISS score to improve trauma coding.


Subject(s)
Medical Records Systems, Computerized/standards , Multiple Trauma/classification , Resource Allocation , Trauma Severity Indices , Wounds and Injuries/classification , Adult , Databases, Factual , Female , Health Resources , Hospital Costs , Hospital Mortality , Humans , International Classification of Diseases/classification , International Classification of Diseases/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/economics , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Resource Allocation/economics , Resource Allocation/standards , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/economics , Wounds and Injuries/diagnosis , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Wounds and Injuries/mortality , Young Adult
14.
Unfallchirurg ; 121(4): 306-312, 2018 Apr.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28357479

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Many publications, mainly from other countries, suggest that the treatment of seriously injured children might be better in specialised paediatric trauma centres than in general trauma centres. Data from Germany are not available yet, but those from abroad were used for the recommendations made by the German Association for Trauma Surgery (DGU) on the topic of paediatric trauma in the "White Paper on Trauma Care". The goal of this study was to analyse whether the outcome of severely injured children is dependent on treatment level and on the availability of a paediatric surgeon based on the given data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data from the "TraumaRegister DGU" between 2002 and 2012 were used. Children aged 1-15 years treated during the period 2002-2012 were included. Severity had to reach a minimum Injury Severity Score (ISS) of 9 and the treatment had to involve a stay at an Intensive Care Unit. Patients with an ISS ≥9 who died were also included to take into consideration children with particularly severe injuries. RESULTS: Hospitals without a paediatric surgeon transferred the patients significantly more frequently (p < 0.001). Mean hospital stay was shorter in centres with a paediatric surgeon, with slightly longer median stays at an Intensive Care Unit. Hospitals without a paediatric surgeon performed slightly more frequent surgical interventions on injured children (barely significant at p = 0.045). The death rate and the calculated Revised Injury Severity Classification (RISC) II prognosis were the same with or without the presence of a paediatric surgeon. No difference was found in the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) between the group with and the group without involvement of a paediatric surgeon. DISCUSSION: Overall, the medical care of seriously injured and polytraumatised children in Germany is good at all levels of treatment whether a paediatric surgeon is involved or not.


Subject(s)
Multiple Trauma/surgery , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Germany , Humans , Infant , Injury Severity Score , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Male , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Patient Transfer/statistics & numerical data
15.
Z Orthop Unfall ; 155(5): 603-622, 2017 Oct.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29050055

ABSTRACT

The adequate treatment of severely injured patients is challenging and can only be successfully executed when it starts at the accident site and is continued in all treatment phases including the early rehabilitation phase. Treatment should be performed by an interdisciplinary team guided by a trauma surgeon in order to adequately manage the severe injuries some of which are life-threatening. Treatment of polytrauma patients is a key task of certified trauma centers and must follow standardized guidelines. For a successful therapy of severely injured patients lifetime training at regular intervals in well-established polytrauma concepts is a mandatory requirement.


Subject(s)
Emergency Service, Hospital , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Operating Rooms , Advanced Trauma Life Support Care , Air Ambulances , Algorithms , Early Medical Intervention , Emergency Medical Services , Germany , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Interdisciplinary Communication , Intersectoral Collaboration , Male , Middle Aged , Multidetector Computed Tomography , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/mortality , Shock, Traumatic/classification , Shock, Traumatic/diagnosis , Shock, Traumatic/mortality , Shock, Traumatic/therapy , Survival Rate , Tomography, Spiral Computed , Trauma Centers , Ultrasonography
16.
J Orthop Trauma ; 31(11): 606-609, 2017 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29053544

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of using the Orthopaedic Trauma Association (OTA/AO) classification for both bone forearm fractures in predicting compartment syndrome. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. SETTING: Level 1 Academic Trauma Center. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: One hundred fifty-one patients 18 years of age and older, with both bone forearm fractures diagnosed from 2001 to 2016 were categorized based on the OTA/AO classification. Patients with both bone fractures caused by gunshot wounds were excluded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: The endpoint for our study was whether forearm fasciotomies were performed based on the presence of compartment syndrome. RESULTS: Of a total of 151 both bone forearm fractures, 15% underwent fasciotomy. Six of 80 (7.5%) grouped 22-A3, 8 of 44 (18%) grouped 22-B3, and 9 of 27 (33%) grouped 22-C underwent fasciotomies for compartment syndrome (P = 0.004). The relative risks of developing compartment syndrome for group 22-B3 versus 22-A3 was 2.42 (P = 0.08), 22-C versus 22-B3 was 1.83 (P = 0.15), and 22-C versus 22-A3 was 4.44 (P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant correlation between the OTA/AO classification and the need for fasciotomies, with group C fractures representing the highest risk. Clinicians can use this information to have a higher index of suspicion for compartment syndrome based on OTA/AO classification to help minimize the risk of a missed diagnosis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.


Subject(s)
Compartment Syndromes/epidemiology , Multiple Trauma/surgery , Radius Fractures/classification , Radius Fractures/surgery , Ulna Fractures/classification , Ulna Fractures/surgery , Adult , Age Distribution , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Compartment Syndromes/etiology , Compartment Syndromes/physiopathology , Female , Forearm Injuries/classification , Forearm Injuries/surgery , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fracture Healing/physiology , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/classification , Predictive Value of Tests , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Sex Distribution , Treatment Outcome
17.
Anesth Analg ; 125(6): 1960-1966, 2017 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28891913

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (PS) classification system assesses the preoperative health of patients. Previous studies demonstrated poor interrater reliability and variable ASA PS scores, especially in trauma scenarios. There are few studies that evaluated the assignment of ASA PS scores in trauma patients and no studies that evaluated ASA PS assignment in severely injured adult polytrauma patients. Our objective was to assess interrater reliability and identify sources of discrepancy among anesthesiologists and trauma surgeons in designating ASA PS scores to adult polytrauma patients. METHODS: A link to an online survey containing questions assessing attitudes regarding ASA PS classification, demographic information, and 8 fictional trauma cases was e-mailed to anesthesiologists and trauma surgeons. The participants were asked to assign an ASA PS score to each scenario and explain their choice. Rater-versus-reference and interrater reliability, beyond that expected by chance, among respondents was analyzed using the Fleiss kappa analysis. RESULTS: A total of 349 participants completed the survey. All 8 cases had inconsistent ASA PS scores; several cases had scores ranging from I to VI and variable emergency (E) designations. Using weighted kappa (Kw) analysis for a subset of 201 respondents (101 trauma surgeons [S] and 100 anesthesiologists [A]), we found moderate (Kw = 0.63; SE = 0.024; 95% confidence interval, 0.594-0.666; P < .001) interrater-versus-reference reliability. The interrater reliability was fair (Kw = 0.43; SE = 0.037; 95% confidence interval, 0.360-0.491; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates fair interrater reliability beyond that expected by chance of the ASA PS scores among anesthesiologists and trauma surgeons when assessing adult polytrauma patients. Although the ASA PS is used in some trauma risk stratification models, discrepancies of ASA PS scores assigned to trauma cases exist. Future modifications of the ASA PS guidelines should aim to improve the interrater reliability of ASA PS scores in trauma patients. Further studies are warranted to determine the value of the ASA PS score as a trauma prognostic metric.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists/standards , Attitude of Health Personnel , Health Status Indicators , Multiple Trauma/classification , Societies, Medical/standards , Surveys and Questionnaires , Adult , Anesthesiologists/psychology , Female , Forecasting , Humans , Male , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Multiple Trauma/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology
18.
World J Emerg Surg ; 12: 41, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828035

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The urine output is an important clinical parameter of renal function and blood volume status, especially in critically ill multiple trauma patients. In the present study, the minute-to-minute urine flow rate and its variability were analyzed in hypotensive multiple trauma patients during the first 6 h of their ICU (intensive care unit) stay. These parameters have not been previously reported. METHODS: The study was retrospective and observational. Demographic and clinical data were extracted from the computerized Register Information Systems. A total of 59 patients were included in the study. The patients were divided into two study groups. Group 1 consisted of 29 multiple trauma patients whose systolic blood pressure was greater than 90 mmHg on admission to the ICU and who were consequently deemed to be hemodynamically compromised. Group 2 consisted of 30 patients whose systolic blood pressure was less than 90 mmHg on admission to the ICU and who were therefore regarded as hemodynamically uncompromised. RESULTS: The urine output and urine flow rate variability during the first 6 h of the patients' ICU stay was significantly lower in group 2 than in group 1 (p < 0.001 and 0.006 respectively). Statistical analysis by the Pearson method demonstrated a strong direct correlation between decreased urine flow rate variability and decreased urine output per hour (R = 0.17; P = 0.009), decreased mean arterial blood pressure (R = 0.24; p = 0.001), and increased heart rate (R = 0.205; p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that minute-to-minute urine flow rate variability is a reliable incipient marker of hypovolemia and that it should therefore take its place among the parameters used to monitor the hemodynamic status of critically ill multiple trauma patients.


Subject(s)
Flowmeters , Hypovolemia/diagnosis , Monitoring, Physiologic/standards , Multiple Trauma/therapy , Urine/physiology , APACHE , Adult , Cardiac Output/physiology , Female , Hemodynamics/physiology , Humans , Hypovolemia/physiopathology , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Physiologic/methods , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/diagnosis , Retrospective Studies , Trauma Centers/organization & administration , Trauma Centers/statistics & numerical data
19.
Unfallchirurg ; 120(9): 790-794, 2017 Sep.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28801739

ABSTRACT

The new treatment procedures of the German Statutory Accident Insurance (DGUV) have ramifications for the injury type procedure clinics (VAV) from medical, economic and structural aspects. Whereas the latter can be assessed as positive, the medical and economical aspects are perceived as being negative. Problems arise from the partially unclear formulation of the injury type catalogue, which results in unpleasant negotiations with the occupational insurance associations with respect to financial remuneration for services rendered. Furthermore, the medical competence of the VAV clinics will be reduced by the preset specifications of the VAV catalogue, which opens up an additional field of tension between medical treatment, fulfillment of the obligatory training and acquisition of personnel as well as the continually increasing economic pressure. From the perspective of the author, the relinquence of medical competence imposed by the regulations of the new VAV catalogue is "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" because many VAV clinics nationwide also partially have competence in the severe injury type procedure (SAV). A concrete "competence-based approval" for the individual areas of the VAV procedure would be sensible and would maintain the comprehensive care of insured persons and also increase or strengthen the willingness of participating VAV hospitals for unconditional implementation of the new VAV procedure.


Subject(s)
Insurance, Accident , Multiple Trauma/therapy , National Health Programs , Clinical Competence , Costs and Cost Analysis , Diagnosis-Related Groups/classification , Diagnosis-Related Groups/economics , Education, Medical, Continuing , Fracture Fixation, Internal/economics , Germany , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Insurance, Accident/economics , Length of Stay/economics , Multiple Trauma/classification , Multiple Trauma/economics , National Health Programs/economics , Orthopedics/education , Reimbursement Mechanisms/economics , Reoperation/economics
20.
J Foot Ankle Surg ; 56(4): 793-796, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28633779

ABSTRACT

Although fracture type and treatment options for ankle fractures are well defined, the differences between mono- and polytrauma patients and low- and high-energy trauma have not been addressed. The aim of the present study was to compare the fracture type and trauma mechanism between mono- and polytrauma and low- and high-energy trauma patients with an ankle fracture. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study. Fractures were classified according to the Lauge-Hansen classification and a descriptive classification. High-energy trauma (HET) was defined using triage criteria. All other patients were classified as having experienced low-energy trauma (LET). The patients were divided into 2 groups according to the injury severity score (ISS). Monotrauma patients were defined as patients with an ISS of 4 to 11 with an isolated ankle fracture or an ankle fracture with a minor contusion or laceration. Polytrauma patients were defined as patients with an ISS of ≥16 with ≥2 body regions involved. Patients with an ISS from 12 to 15 were excluded. A total of 96 patients were eligible for analysis. Of the 96 patients, 62 had experienced monotrauma and 34 had experienced polytrauma. A significant difference was found between the mono- and polytrauma patients in the Lauge-Hansen classification (p < .001). Monotrauma patients had a high incidence of an isolated supination external rotation injury. Supination adduction and pronation abduction injuries were more often observed in polytrauma patients. The same pattern was observed for ankle fractures after HET compared with LET (p < .001), because all pronation abduction and supination adduction injuries were observed after a HET mechanism. The results of the present study indicate that polytrauma patients sustain different types of ankle fractures than patients with an isolated ankle fracture. This difference likely results from the high-energy transfer associated with polytrauma, because pronation abduction and supination adduction injuries were only observed after HET.


Subject(s)
Ankle Fractures/classification , Ankle Fractures/etiology , Multiple Trauma/classification , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Multiple Trauma/etiology , Pronation , Retrospective Studies , Supination , Triage
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL