Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 102
Filter
1.
Elife ; 102021 04 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33871357

ABSTRACT

In 2016/2017, Washington State experienced a mumps outbreak despite high childhood vaccination rates, with cases more frequently detected among school-aged children and members of the Marshallese community. We sequenced 166 mumps virus genomes collected in Washington and other US states, and traced mumps introductions and transmission within Washington. We uncover that mumps was introduced into Washington approximately 13 times, primarily from Arkansas, sparking multiple co-circulating transmission chains. Although age and vaccination status may have impacted transmission, our data set could not quantify their precise effects. Instead, the outbreak in Washington was overwhelmingly sustained by transmission within the Marshallese community. Our findings underscore the utility of genomic data to clarify epidemiologic factors driving transmission and pinpoint contact networks as critical for mumps transmission. These results imply that contact structures and historic disparities may leave populations at increased risk for respiratory virus disease even when a vaccine is effective and widely used.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Mumps virus/physiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Genome, Viral , Humans , Infant , Micronesia/ethnology , Middle Aged , Mumps/transmission , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/genetics , Washington/epidemiology , Young Adult
2.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 17(5): 1313-1316, 2021 05 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121326

ABSTRACT

The exact impact of the decline in childhood vaccination coverage during COVID-19 outbreak has not been estimated for any vaccine-preventable diseases. Our objective was to evaluate the impact of decreased mumps vaccination due to COVID-19 on the disease burden of mumps in Japan. Using a previously validated dynamic transmission model of mumps infection in Japan, the incidence rate of mumps over the next 30 y since July 2020 was estimated. The estimated average incidences were 269.1, 302.0, and 455.4/100,000 person-years in rapid recovery, slow recovery, and permanent decline scenarios. Compared with the rapid recovery scenario, the incremental number of mumps cases, total costs, and QALYs loss over the next 30 y were 6.53 million cases, 2.63 billion USD, and 49,246 for the permanent decline scenario, respectively. In conclusion, the persistent decline of mumps vaccination rate as an impact of COVID-19 causes a significant incremental disease burden of mumps, which is consistent irrespective of the possible decline of transmission rate of mumps infection, unless the rapid recovery of coverage rate is achieved. The immediate measures to advocate the vaccination program is essential to mitigate the incremental disease burden in the COVID-19 period.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/transmission , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Child , Humans , Japan/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2
3.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 69(22): 666-669, 2020 Jun 05.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32497030

ABSTRACT

In August 2019, 30 attendees at a Nebraska wedding developed mumps after being exposed to one asymptomatic index patient who was fully vaccinated according to Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations (1), resulting in a multistate outbreak. A public health investigation and response revealed epidemiologic links that extended from the index patient through secondary, tertiary, and quaternary patients and culminated in a measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) booster vaccination campaign in the local community where approximately half of the patients resided.


Subject(s)
Asymptomatic Diseases , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/transmission , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Female , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Male , Marriage , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Mumps/prevention & control , Nebraska/epidemiology , United States/epidemiology , Young Adult
4.
J Immunol Res ; 2020: 8130760, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300606

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: From 2005 to 2016, the prevention and control of mumps in China have undergone three stages of transition. These include the use of MuCV as a self-supported vaccine, the introduction of one-dose MMR to the Expanded Program on Immunization (EPI), and the administration of two-dose MuCV following supplementary immunization activities (SIAs) using MM. Here, using surveillance data, we assessed the epidemiology of mumps during the three stages. METHODS: Children in Quzhou of China born from 2005 to 2016 and registered in the Zhejiang Provincial Immunization Information System (ZJIIS) were included. We analyzed the epidemic data and calculated incidence and MuCV coverage via birth cohorts. RESULTS: The average incidence of mumps in 2005-2006, 2007-2010, and 2011-2016 was 51.57, 41.02, and 12.53 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. The highest incidence was in children aged 6-14 years from 2005-2016, of which the majority were school students (67.84%). Approximately 90% of the reported outbreaks occurred in school children (primary school/middle school). The seasonal characteristics of mumps were less obvious from 2011 to 2016. The coverage of one-dose MMR in the 2005 birth cohort was 71.38%. For the 2006-2010 birth cohort, the coverage of one-dose MuCV was 96.82% and the coverage of two-dose MuCV was 17.68%. The children born from 2011 to 2016 were only free vaccinated with MMR; the coverage of one-dose MuCV was 99.10%. The mumps incidence in the three birth cohorts significantly declined (X 2 = 805.90, P < 0.001 for trend). Except the children less than two years old, the mumps incidence for the children born from 2006 to 2010 was higher than that for the children born from 2011 to 2016. CONCLUSION: The mumps incidence significantly declined following the introduction of one-dose MMR. The SIA using MM led to a rapid reduction of mumps cases. Therefore, we recommend a two-dose MuCV routine immunization schedule and improved vaccination coverage.


Subject(s)
Mass Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Vaccination Coverage/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , China/epidemiology , Disease Outbreaks , Epidemiological Monitoring , Female , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Incidence , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Mass Vaccination/trends , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/therapeutic use , Mumps/transmission , Mumps Vaccine/therapeutic use , Retrospective Studies , Treatment Outcome , Vaccination Coverage/trends , Young Adult
5.
PLoS Biol ; 18(2): e3000611, 2020 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32045407

ABSTRACT

Unusually large outbreaks of mumps across the United States in 2016 and 2017 raised questions about the extent of mumps circulation and the relationship between these and prior outbreaks. We paired epidemiological data from public health investigations with analysis of mumps virus whole genome sequences from 201 infected individuals, focusing on Massachusetts university communities. Our analysis suggests continuous, undetected circulation of mumps locally and nationally, including multiple independent introductions into Massachusetts and into individual communities. Despite the presence of these multiple mumps virus lineages, the genomic data show that one lineage has dominated in the US since at least 2006. Widespread transmission was surprising given high vaccination rates, but we found no genetic evidence that variants arising during this outbreak contributed to vaccine escape. Viral genomic data allowed us to reconstruct mumps transmission links not evident from epidemiological data or standard single-gene surveillance efforts and also revealed connections between apparently unrelated mumps outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Genome, Viral/genetics , Mumps virus/genetics , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/transmission , Genotype , Humans , Molecular Epidemiology , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/classification , Mutation , Phylogeny , Sequence Analysis, DNA , United States/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Viral Proteins/genetics
6.
Math Med Biol ; 37(3): 303-312, 2020 09 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31271214

ABSTRACT

The aim of this work is to investigate the optimal vaccine sharing between two susceptible, infected, removed (SIR) centres in the presence of migration fluxes of susceptibles and infected individuals during the mumps outbreak. Optimality of the vaccine allocation means the minimization of the total number of lost working days during the whole period of epidemic outbreak $[0,t_f]$, which can be described by the functional $Q=\int _0^{t_f}I(t)\,{\textrm{d}}t$, where $I(t)$ stands for the number of infectives at time $t$. We explain the behaviour of the optimal allocation, which depends on the model parameters and the amount of vaccine available $V$.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps Vaccine/supply & distribution , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Basic Reproduction Number/statistics & numerical data , Disease Susceptibility , Health Care Rationing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mathematical Concepts , Models, Statistical , Mumps/transmission , Population Dynamics/statistics & numerical data , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data
7.
J Public Health Manag Pract ; 26(2): 124-130, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31592985

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To examine outbreak response-associated costs, lessons learned, and challenges encountered during a local health department's response to a mumps outbreak. DESIGN: We conducted semistructured interviews with individuals directly involved in the response to a mumps outbreak and analyzed outbreak response-associated cost data. SETTING: In March-July 2018, a mumps outbreak occurred in Chester County, Pennsylvania. The outbreak primarily affected an immigrant community, some of whom spoke little or no English and were uninsured and/or undocumented. This necessitated an urgent response from the Chester County Health Department, which implemented a variety of public health interventions, including outreach to local health care providers and the execution of vaccination clinics at 2 local mushroom farms where case contacts worked. A total of 39 suspected or confirmed mumps cases were reported in Chester County, and 22 suspected or confirmed cases were reported by 2 neighboring jurisdictions. PARTICIPANTS: Health department employees (n = 7) and community partners (n = 2). Areas of expertise included emergency preparedness, nursing, medicine, disease surveillance, and epidemiology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Operational challenges encountered and lessons learned during the mumps outbreak response, including outbreak response-associated costs, which could inform other communities' planning and preparedness for outbreaks in similar populations and improve outbreak response operations. RESULTS: Immigration status emerged as a key challenge, which highlighted the importance of building trust through community outreach and partnerships and the need for culturally competent communication. In addition, vaccine availability, accessibility, and cost played a major role in response operations and necessitated the involvement of community partners to mitigate these barriers. Outbreak response-associated costs totaled $35 305. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges that occurred in this outbreak are broadly relevant to outbreaks that affect similar immigrant communities. Health departments that serve such populations can utilize these lessons to develop improved outbreak response plans that account for these challenges.


Subject(s)
Communication Barriers , Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Emigrants and Immigrants/statistics & numerical data , Mumps/diagnosis , Humans , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/transmission , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Public Health/methods , Public Health/statistics & numerical data , Rubulavirus/pathogenicity
8.
Clin Infect Dis ; 68(10): 1684-1690, 2019 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30204850

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mumps is an acute viral illness that classically presents with parotitis. Although the United States experienced a 99% reduction in mumps cases following implementation of the 2-dose vaccination program in 1989, mumps has resurged in the past 10 years. METHODS: We assessed the epidemiological characteristics of mumps outbreaks with ≥20 cases reported in the United States electronically through the National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System and from supplemental outbreak data through direct communications with jurisdictions from July 2010 through December 2015. Mumps cases were defined using the 2012 Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists case definition. RESULTS: Twenty-three outbreaks with 20-485 cases per outbreak were reported in 18 jurisdictions. The duration of outbreaks ranged from 1.5 to 8.5 months (median, 3 months). All outbreaks involved close-contact settings; 18 (78%) involved universities, 16 (70%) occurred primarily among young adults (median age, 18-24 years), and 9 (39%) occurred in highly vaccinated populations (2-dose measles-mumps-rubella vaccine coverage ≥85%). CONCLUSIONS: During 2010-2015, multiple mumps outbreaks among highly vaccinated populations in close-contact settings occurred. Most cases occurred among vaccinated young adults, suggesting that waning immunity played a role. Further evaluation of risk factors associated with these outbreaks is warranted.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/statistics & numerical data , Epidemiological Monitoring , Immunization Programs , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Infant , Middle Aged , Mumps/transmission , Qualitative Research , Risk Factors , Students/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Universities , Young Adult
9.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 19(2): 177-184, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30558994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2007-08, a genotype J mumps outbreak occurred among Aboriginal people in northern Western Australia, despite high vaccine coverage. In March, 2015, a second protracted mumps outbreak occurred in northern Western Australia and spread widely across rural areas of the state. This time the outbreak was caused by a genotype G virus and again primarily affected Aboriginal people. We aimed to describe the epidemiology of this outbreak. METHODS: In this population-based surveillance study, we analysed statutory notifications and public health case follow-up data from the Western Australia Notifiable Infectious Diseases Database and vaccination information from the Australian Childhood Immunisation Register. An outbreak case of mumps was notified if the affected person was living in or visiting a community in Western Australia where there was active mumps transmission, and if mumps infection was confirmed by laboratory diagnosis or by an epidemiological link. We analysed case demographics, vaccination status, and age-standardised attack rates in Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal people by region of notification. Laboratory diagnoses were made by real-time RT-PCR, serology, or both, and carried out by the sole public pathology provider in Western Australia. FINDINGS: Between March 1, 2015, and December 31, 2016, 893 outbreak cases were notified. 798 (89%) of 893 outbreak cases were reported in Aboriginal people. 40 (4%) of 893 people were admitted to hospital, and 33 (7%) of 462 men reported orchitis. Mumps attack rates increased sharply with age, peaking in the 15-19 age group. 371 (89%) of 419 people aged 1-19 years were fully vaccinated and 29 (7%) were partly vaccinated. Of the 240 people who tested positive by real-time RT-PCR and had also been tested for mumps-specific IgG and IgM, 165 (69%) were positive for IgG but negative for IgM, indicating the importance of RT-PCR testing for diagnosis in vaccinated populations. None of the cases from the 2007-08 genotype J outbreak were re-notified. INTERPRETATION: The number of mumps outbreaks reported in recent years among highly vaccinated populations, including Indigenous populations, has been growing. More widespread and pre-emptive use of the third dose of measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine might be required to control and prevent future outbreaks in high-risk populations. Research should explore the benefit of increasing the intervals between vaccine doses to strengthen the durability of vaccine protection. FUNDING: None.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control , Mumps virus/genetics , Mumps virus/immunology , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Vaccination , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Genotype , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Male , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps/transmission , Mumps/virology , Mumps virus/isolation & purification , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , Serologic Tests , Western Australia/epidemiology , Young Adult
10.
US Army Med Dep J ; (1-18): 55-59, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30165722

ABSTRACT

Mumps is an acute viral disease caused by a paramyxovirus that presents with fever and swelling of one or more of the salivary glands. Although not generally considered a disease of military importance, mumps has been associated with outbreaks among young adults in close living quarters, potentially placing Soldiers at risk for transmission of mumps when living in congregated settings. This article reports a recent public health response to 3 imported mumps cases occurring at Fort Campbell, Kentucky, that resulted in a contact investigation for 109 close contacts across varied settings. No secondary mumps cases were identified. This report highlights the need for continuous preparation for public health emergency response, and the need to develop and maintain strong working relationships with local civilian public health assets, as well as with installation organizations, such as schools, child care centers, and public affairs resources.


Subject(s)
Communicable Diseases, Imported/transmission , Contact Tracing , Mumps/transmission , Adult , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Kentucky , Male , Young Adult
11.
BMC Infect Dis ; 18(1): 199, 2018 05 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29716545

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Information on the incubation period and period of infectiousness or shedding of infectious pathogens is critical for management and control of communicable diseases in schools and other childcare settings. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature review (Pubmed and Embase) to identify and critically appraise all relevant published articles using incubation, infectiousness or shedding, and exclusion period as parameters for the search. No language, time, geographical or study design restrictions were applied. RESULTS: A total of 112 articles met the eligibility criteria. A relatively large number were retrieved for gastrointestinal diseases and influenza or respiratory syncytial virus, but there were few or no studies for other diseases. Although a considerable number of publications reported the incubation and shedding periods, there was less evidence concerning the period of infectiousness. On average, five days of exclusion is considered for measles, mumps, rubella, varicella and pertussis. For other diseases, such as most cases of meningococcal disease, hepatitis A and influenza exclusion is considered as long as severe symptoms persist. However, these results are based on a diverse range of study characteristics, including age, treatment, vaccination, underlying diseases, diagnostic tools, viral load, study design and definitions, making statistical analysis difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Despite inconsistent definitions for key variables and the diversity of studies reviewed, published data provide sufficient quantitative estimates to inform decision making in schools and other childcare settings. The results can be used as a reference when deciding about the exclusion of a child with a communicable disease that both prevents exposure and avoids unnecessary absenteeism.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Communicable Diseases/transmission , Infectious Disease Incubation Period , Adolescent , Chickenpox/prevention & control , Chickenpox/transmission , Child , Child Care , Child, Preschool , Hepatitis A/prevention & control , Hepatitis A/transmission , Humans , Infant , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/transmission , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/transmission , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/transmission , Schools , Vaccination , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/transmission
12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278378

ABSTRACT

Mumps is a common childhood viral disease and children have been vaccinated throughout the world since 1967. The incidence of mumps has increased with more than 300,000 young people infected with mumps annually in mainland China since 2005. Therefore, we designed and analyzed long-term mumps surveillance data in an SVEILR (susceptible-vaccinated-exposed-severely infectious-mildly infectious-recovered) dynamic transmission model with optimized parameter values to describe the dynamics of mumps infections in China. There were 18.02% of mumps infected young adults seeking medical advice. The vaccine coverage has been insufficient in China. Young adults with frequent contact and mild infection were identified as a major driver of mumps epidemics. The reproduction number of mumps was determined 4.28 in China. Sensitivity analysis of the basic reproduction number and the endemic equilibrium was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of mumps control measures. We propose to increase the vaccine coverage and make two doses of MMR (Measles, mumps and rubella) vaccines freely available in China.


Subject(s)
Models, Biological , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/transmission , Adult , Algorithms , Antibodies, Viral , Child , China/epidemiology , Epidemics , Humans , Incidence , Infant , Measles/prevention & control , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine , Mumps/epidemiology , Rubella , Young Adult
13.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 96(5): 1215-1221, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28500809

ABSTRACT

AbstractMumps, a highly contagious, viral disease continues to spread in India, despite the availability of an effective vaccine. On November 24, 2014, we came across a suspected case of mumps in a 6-year-old boy in a village of Bhusandapur sector in Odisha. We initiated an outbreak investigation using standard techniques outlined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. This uncovered a silent epidemic of 94 case patients (10% of the population) over a period of 16 weeks between August and December 2014, in a single village, which had gone completely unnoticed by the existing health-care system. Since the index case was one of the last case patients of the outbreak, investigation for immediate control was not a priority. Hence, we have used this exercise to describe the outbreak and identify causes that led to its nondetection. Age range of the case patients was between 2 and 40 years; 85 (90.4%) case patients were ≤ 15 years of age and 54 (57.4%) were females. Average duration of illness was 9 days. No child had received the mumps vaccine. The outbreak had led to a community expenditure of 538 USD. The exercise uncovered a number of weak links in the essential public health services within the health-care delivery system in the area.


Subject(s)
Contact Tracing , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps virus/physiology , Mumps/epidemiology , Public Health Surveillance , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Delivery of Health Care , Female , Government Programs , Humans , India/epidemiology , Male , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/economics , Mumps/transmission
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 17(1): 56, 2017 01 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28068914

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Mumps emerged among highly vaccinated populations in the Netherlands. This offered a unique opportunity to study mumps virus transmission. In particular the extent to which asymptomatic infections in vaccinated people contribute to ongoing mumps virus transmission is uncertain. Insight into this could help project the future burden of mumps in vaccinated populations. We therefore studied the relative infectiousness of symptomatic and asymptomatic cases. METHODS: In a cohort study we followed contacts of notified mumps cases (ring 1) and contacts' contacts (ring 2) for 40 days to ascertain symptoms of mumps and social contacts by weekly diaries and questionnaires, and mumps virus infections by taking finger stick dried blood spot specimens (DBS) that were tested for mumps-specific IgG antibodies. Mumps IgG concentrations >1500 RU/ml in a single sample, a four-fold increase in IgG antibody concentration in paired samples, or a positive oral fluid PCR were defined as recent infection. RESULTS: We recruited 99 contacts (40 in ring 1 and 59 in ring 2) of 10 mumps index cases. The median age of participants was 23 years (range 18-57 years), 31 (31%) were male. At study entry, DBS of 4 out of 78 (5%) participants with samples showed serological evidence of recent mumps virus infection. Three of these reported mumps symptoms. Among the 59 participants who provided DBS at the beginning and end of the follow-up period, none had serological evidence of infection during this period. Of 72 participants who provided at least one oral fluid sample, one participant (1%) who also reported mumps symptoms, was found PCR positive. Of all 99 participants, the attack rate of self-reported mumps was 4% (95% CI 1.1-10.0%). Of the 5 laboratory confirmed mumps cases, 1 reported no mumps symptoms (percentage asymptomatic 20% (95% CI 0-71%)). Compared to non-students, students had larger households and more household members who were born after 1980 (p < 0.01 and <0.01, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that this prospective cohort study design allows for inference of the proportion of asymptomatic mumps infections. Because we only detected one asymptomatic mumps virus infection, we could not assess the relative infectiousness of asymptomatic mumps. Household characteristics of students differed from non-students. This may partly explain recent mumps epidemiology in the Netherlands.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/immunology , Immunoglobulin G/immunology , Mumps/transmission , Residence Characteristics , Saliva/virology , Students , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Family Characteristics , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/immunology , Mumps virus/genetics , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
17.
Euro Surveill ; 19(16): 20776, 2014 Apr 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24786261

ABSTRACT

We describe a mumps outbreak in a highly-vaccinated population attending a party at a youth club. In a retrospective cohort study with 60 of approximately 100 participants responding, vaccination status was verified for 58/59 respondents, of whom 54 were vaccinated twice and four once. The attack rate was 22% (13 cases, all vaccinated), with smoking at the party (risk ratio (RR) 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.6­6.0, p=0.001) and age ≥21 years (RR 4.7; 95% CI: 2.1­10.2, p<0.0001) as risk factors for disease in the binominal regression analysis. Mild upper respiratory illness was also highly prevalent in those who did not meet the mumps case definition (n=46) after the party, suggesting that mumps virus infection may cause mild disease in vaccinated individuals. Our investigation adds toevidence that crowded social events and smoking may facilitate spread of mumps virus among vaccinated populations, with waning immunity playing a role. The suggestion that mumps virus infection in vaccinated individuals may manifest as mild upper respiratory illness could have implications for transmission and warrants further investigation.


Subject(s)
Crowding , Disease Outbreaks , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Smoking/epidemiology , Vaccination/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Adult , Age Distribution , Confidence Intervals , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Mumps/diagnosis , Mumps/transmission , Mumps Vaccine/immunology , Mumps virus/immunology , Netherlands/epidemiology , Prevalence , Regression Analysis , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Socioeconomic Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , Young Adult
18.
Vaccine ; 32(38): 4814-22, 2014 Aug 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24726251

ABSTRACT

Vaccine-preventable infectious diseases may be introduced into the healthcare setting and pose a serious risk to vulnerable populations including immunocompromised patients. Healthcare providers (HCPs) are exposed to these pathogens through their daily tasks and may serve as a reservoir for ongoing disease transmission in the healthcare setting. The primary method of protection from work-related infection risk is vaccination that protects not only an individual HCP from disease, but also subsequent patients in contact with that HCP. Individual HCPs and healthcare institutions must balance the ethical and professional responsibility to protect their patients from nosocomial transmission of preventable infections with HCP autonomy. This article reviews known cases of HCP-to-patient transmission of the most common vaccine-preventable infections encountered in the healthcare setting including hepatitis B virus, influenza virus, Bordetella pertussis, varicella-zoster virus, measles, mumps and rubella virus. The impact of HCP vaccination on patient care and current recommendations for HCP vaccination against vaccine-preventable infectious diseases are also reviewed.


Subject(s)
Communicable Disease Control/methods , Cross Infection/transmission , Health Personnel , Infectious Disease Transmission, Professional-to-Patient/prevention & control , Vaccination , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/prevention & control , Hepatitis B/transmission , Humans , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/transmission , Measles/prevention & control , Measles/transmission , Mumps/prevention & control , Mumps/transmission , Rubella/prevention & control , Rubella/transmission , Whooping Cough/prevention & control , Whooping Cough/transmission
19.
Vaccine ; 32(3): 369-74, 2014 Jan 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24252695

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Mumps outbreaks have been reported among vaccinated populations, and declining mumps vaccine effectiveness (VE) has been suggested as one possible cause. During a large mumps outbreak in New York City, we assessed: (1) VE of measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (MMR) against mumps and (2) risk factors for acquiring mumps in households. METHODS: Cases of mumps were investigated using standard methods. Additional information on disease and vaccination status of household contacts was collected. Case households completed follow-up phone interviews 78-198 days after initial investigation to ascertain additional cases. Mumps cases meeting the study case definition were included in the analysis. Risk factors for mumps were assessed, and VE was calculated using secondary household attack rates. RESULTS: Three hundred and eleven households with 2176 residents were included in the analysis. The median age of residents was 13 years (range <1-85), and 462 (21.2%) residents met the study mumps case definition. Among 7-17 year olds, 89.7% received one or more doses of MMR vaccine, with 76.7% receiving two doses. Young adults aged 10-14 years (OR=2.4, CI=1.3-4.7) and 15-19 years (OR=2.5, CI=1.3-5.0) were at highest risk of mumps. The overall 2-dose VE for secondary contacts aged five and older was 86.3% (CI 63.3-94.9). CONCLUSIONS: The two-dose effectiveness of MMR vaccine against mumps was 86.3%, consistent with other published mumps VE estimates. Many factors likely contributed to this outbreak. Suboptimal MMR coverage in the affected population combined with VE may not have conferred adequate immunity to prevent transmission and may have contributed to this outbreak. Achieving high MMR coverage remains the best available strategy for prevention of mumps outbreaks.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Family Characteristics , Family Health , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Mumps/transmission , New York City/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Young Adult
20.
Pediatr Infect Dis J ; 33(2): 121-5, 2014 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23995590

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In 2009-2010, we investigated a mumps outbreak among a highly vaccinated Orthodox Jewish population in a village in Orange County, NY, to identify risk factors associated with mumps transmission among persons with 2 doses of mumps-containing vaccine. METHODS: Demographic and epidemiologic characteristics were collected on students in grades 6-12 in 3 schools. A mumps case was defined as a student, who self-reported parotitis, orchitis, jaw swelling and/or a mumps-related complication or whose mumps illness was reported to the Orange County Health Department during September 1, 2009, to January 18, 2010. Log-binomial regression analyses were conducted separately for boys and girls as they attended different schools and had different hours of study. RESULTS: Of the 2503 students with 2 documented doses of mumps-containing vaccine, 320 (13%) developed mumps. Risk of mumps increased with increasing number of mumps cases in the class [≥8 vs. ≤3 cases: boys aRR = 3.1; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.0-5.0; girls aRR = 2.6; 95% CI: 1.6-4.1] and household (>1 vs. 0 cases: boys aRR = 4.3 95% CI: 3.7-5.6; girls aRR = 10.1 95% CI: 7.1-14.3). Age at first dose, time since last dose, time between first and second dose, school, class size, number of hours at school per week and household size were not significantly associated with having mumps. CONCLUSIONS: Two doses of mumps-containing vaccine may not be as effective in outbreak settings with multiple, prolonged and intense exposure. Additional studies are required to understand why such mumps outbreaks occur and how they can be prevented in the future.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Jews/statistics & numerical data , Mumps Vaccine/administration & dosage , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/transmission , Adolescent , Child , Female , Humans , Male , Multivariate Analysis , Mumps/ethnology , Mumps/prevention & control , New York/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Students
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL