Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Surg Oncol ; 124(8): 1499-1507, 2021 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34416016

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Routine use of adjunct intraprocedural fresh frozen biopsy (FFP) or point-of-care (POC) cytology at the time of image-guided biopsy can improve diagnostic tissue yields for musculoskeletal neoplasms, but these are associated with increased costs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to ascertain the most cost-effective adjunctive test for image-guided biopsies of musculoskeletal neoplasms. METHODS: This expected value cost-effectiveness microsimulation compared the payoffs of cost (2020 United States dollars) and effectiveness (quality-adjusted life, in days) on each of the competing strategies. A literature review and institutional data were used to ascertain probabilities, diagnostic yields, utility values, and direct medical costs associated with each strategy. Payer and societal perspectives are presented. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses evaluated model uncertainties. RESULTS: The total cost and effectiveness for each of the strategies were $1248.98, $1414.09, $1980.53, and 80.31, 79.74, 79.69 days for the use of FFP, permanent pathology only, and POC cytology, respectively. The use of FFP dominated the competing strategies. Sensitivity analyses revealed FFP as the most cost-effective across all clinically plausible values. CONCLUSIONS: Adjunct FFP is most cost-effective in improving the diagnostic yield of image-guided biopsies for musculoskeletal neoplasms. These findings are robust to sensitivity analyses using clinically plausible probabilities.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Image-Guided Biopsy/economics , Muscle Neoplasms/economics , Musculoskeletal Diseases/economics , Quality-Adjusted Life Years , Bone Neoplasms/diagnosis , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Humans , Muscle Neoplasms/diagnosis , Muscle Neoplasms/surgery , Musculoskeletal Diseases/diagnosis , Musculoskeletal Diseases/surgery , Prognosis , United States
2.
J Bone Joint Surg Br ; 88(9): 1207-11, 2006 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16943474

ABSTRACT

The most appropriate protocol for the biopsy of musculoskeletal tumours is controversial, with some authors advocating CT-guided core biopsy. At our hospital the initial biopsies of most musculoskeletal tumours has been by operative core biopsy with evaluation by frozen section which determines whether diagnostic tissue has been obtained and, if possible, gives the definitive diagnosis. In order to determine the accuracy and cost-effectiveness of this protocol we have undertaken a retrospective audit of biopsies of musculoskeletal tumours performed over a period of two years. A total of 104 patients had biopsies according to this regime. All gave the diagnosis apart from one minor error which did not alter the management of the patient. There was no requirement for re-biopsy. This protocol was more labour-intensive and 38% more costly than CT-guided core biopsy (AU$1804 vs AU$1308). However, the accuracy and avoidance of the anxiety associated with repeat biopsy outweighed these disadvantages.


Subject(s)
Bone Neoplasms/pathology , Sarcoma/pathology , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/pathology , Biopsy/economics , Biopsy/methods , Biopsy, Needle/methods , Bone Neoplasms/economics , Bone Neoplasms/surgery , Clinical Protocols , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diagnostic Errors , Female , Humans , Medical Audit , Middle Aged , Muscle Neoplasms/economics , Muscle Neoplasms/pathology , Muscle Neoplasms/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Sarcoma/economics , Sarcoma/surgery , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/economics , Soft Tissue Neoplasms/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL