Long-term therapy with dienogest or other oral cyclic estrogen-progestogen can reduce the need for ovarian endometrioma surgery.

BACKGROUND: Almost 10% of women in reproductive age are diagnosed with ovarian endometriomas and can experience symptoms and infertility disorders. Ovarian endometriomas can be treated with medical or surgical therapy. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether long-term therapy with dienogest or oral cyclic estrogen-progestogens is effective in reducing the size of ovarian endometriomas, alleviating associated symptoms, and reducing the requirement for surgery. DESIGN: Prospective non-interventional cohort study. METHODS: We enrolled childbearing women diagnosed with ovarian endometriomas. We collected demographic, clinical, and surgical data, including the evaluation of ovarian endometrioma-associated symptoms and pain using the visual analog scale. We grouped the women according to treatment regimen into dienogest, estrogen-progestogens, and no-treatment. Patient's assessment was performed at baseline and after 12 months evaluating the largest ovarian endometrioma diameter (in millimeters) and the associated symptoms. Furthermore, we analyzed the impact of hormonal treatment in a sub-group of women fulfilling at baseline the criteria for a first-line surgical approach (ovarian endometrioma > 30 mm with visual analog scale > 8 or ovarian endometrioma > 40 mm before assisted reproductive treatments or any ovarian endometrioma(s) > 60 mm). RESULTS: We enrolled 142 patients: 62, 38, and 42 in dienogest, estrogen-progestogens, and no-treatment groups, respectively. No significant differences were found regarding baseline characteristics. After 12 months, the mean largest ovarian endometrioma diameter increased in the no-treatment group (31.1 versus 33.8; p < 0.01), while a significant reduction was registered in the dienogest (35.1 versus 25.8; p < 0.01) and estrogen-progestogens (28.4 versus 16.7; p < 0.01) groups; no significant difference in ovarian endometrioma diameter reduction between these two latter groups was noted (p = 0.18). Ovarian endometrioma-associated symptoms and pain improved in dienogest and estrogen-progestogens groups, with a significantly greater effect for dienogest than for estrogen-progestogens for dysmenorrhea (74% versus 59%; p < 0.01). In the sub-group of women eligible for first-line surgery at baseline, long-term treatment with dienogest and estrogen-progestogens reduced surgical eligibility by 30%. CONCLUSIONS: Decreased mean largest ovarian endometriomas'diameter after 12 months and reduction of the need for surgical treatment by 30% were observed in dienogest and estrogen-progestogens groups. Long-term treatment with dienogest had a greater effect in alleviating dysmenorrhea and pain.

CGRP neuropeptide levels in patients with endometriosis-related pain treated with dienogest: a comparative study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Endometriosis (EM) involves the peripheral nervous system and causes chronic pain. Sensory nerves innervating endometriotic lesions contribute to chronic pain and influence the growth phenotype by releasing neurotrophic factors and interacting with nearby immune cells. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP), a pain-signaling neurotransmitter, has a significant role. This study examines the effect of Dienogest (DNG), a hormone therapy used for managing EM -related pain, on serum CGRP levels in EM patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) assessed pain in diagnosed EM. INDIVIDUALS: Serum samples were obtained to measure CGRP concentration. Participants received a 2 mg/day oral dose of DNG for six months as prescribed treatment. Additional serum samples were collected after this period to measure CGRP levels. RESULTS: In the EM group, 6.7%, 33.3%, and 20% had ovarian EM, ovarian plus uterosacral, and ovarian plus bladder, respectively. The EM group showed higher CGRP serum levels than the control group (80.53 ± 16.13 vs. 58.55 ± 6.93, P < 0.0001). Still, after drug administration, CGRP serum levels significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment levels (69.66 ± 11.53 vs. 80.53 ± 16.13, P < 0.05). The EM group showed higher pain compared to the control group (7.93 ± 1.58 vs. 0.13 ± 0.35, P < 0.0001), but after drug administration, pain significantly decreased compared to pre-treatment levels (1.00 ± 2.00 vs. 7.93 ± 1.58, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: DNG administration reduces pain and serum CGRP levels in EM patients, offering the potential for innovative treatments and tailored options. Understanding neurotransmitter roles and drug effects can aid in discovering more effective modulators for these pathways.

Efficacy and safety of dienogest in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis: A meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and conduct a meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of dienogest (DNG) in the prolonged conservative drug management of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). The findings from this study are intended to serve as a valuable reference for clinical decision-making regarding medication in the context of DIE. METHODS: Following the PRISMA Statement, we searched EMBASE, PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Medline databases for relevant literature published in the public domain from the date of establishment of the database until October 2023. Subsequently, all English publications on clinical studies using DNG for the treatment of DIE were included. Studies involving surgical intervention or drug therapy for postoperative recurrence were excluded. All literature included in the review underwent risk assessment of bias. Two evaluators independently screened the publications, conducted a quality assessment of each article and extracted data. We used Revman 5.4 for the meta-analysis of the included literature. RESULTS: Our final analysis consisted of five clinical studies, involving a total of 256 patients. We found that there were significant improvements in the following indicators post-medication as compared to levels before taking the medication: dysmenorrhea (MD = 4.24, 95 % CI: 2.92-5.56, P < 0.00001), non-menstrual pelvic pain (MD = 3.11, 95 % CI: 2.34-3.88, P < 0.00001), dyspareunia (MD = 1.93, 95 % CI: 1.50-2.37, P < 0.00001), dyschezia (MD = 2.48, 95 % CI: 1.83-3.12, P < 0.00001), and rectosigmoid nodule size (MD = 0.32, 95 % CI: 0.18-0.46, P < 0.00001). Compared with pre-medication levels, the following indicators were significantly worse: headache (RR = 0.03, 95 % CI: 0.00-0.23, P = 0.0006), decreased libido (RR = 0.08, 95 % CI: 0.01-0.62, P = 0.02); and there was no significant improvement in dysuria (P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: DNG showed efficacy in relieving pain-related symptoms and significantly reducing the size of the lesions when used in the drug conservative treatment of DIE.

The Visual Effect of a Down-Regulation With Dienogest and GnRH Analogues in Endometriosis: Lessons Learned From Two-Step Surgical Approach.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the intraoperative visual effect of treatment with GnRH-analogues and Dienogest in endometriosis. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: Every laparoscopy from all the different disciplines in our hospital is documented on video and stored in a database. The study was approved by the local ethics committee. A total of 193 patients with histological proven endometriosis from 2007 to 2021 were included, who underwent 2-step surgical procedure. Indications were endometrioma before CO2-Laser therapy, missing consent because of emergencies or other surgeries from other disciplines, or high active and extended disease. When endometriosis was suspected in a surgery conducted by other disciplines, a gynecological surgeon was called during the surgery. Data and intraoperative videos were reviewed by 2 independent reviewers at one referral center. Only cases with available video of first and second look laparoscopy were included. We excluded patient who had prior hormonal treatment in the last 6 months. Lesions were classified according to the description of Khan et al. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (Version 27.0, IBM). Mann-Whitney U test (nonparametric analysis) and χ2 tests were applied. Percentages were calculated for categorical variables and mean and standard deviation were calculated for continuous variables. Significance level was set to p <.05. INTERVENTIONS: Seventy-seven received GnRH-analogues and 116 Dienogest for preoperative hormone down-regulation. The median duration of down-regulation with GnRH-analogues or Dienogest was 3 months. The mean age was 32.3 (SD 6.3) years for GnRH-analogues and 32.6 (SD 6.3) years for Dienogest, p = .619 respectively. The visible intraoperative effect will be demonstrated in the video. CONCLUSION: The effect of a hormonal treatment can be observed macroscopically in endometriosis. This can help to understand the in vivo response to the administrated treatment. This video is showing our past experience, as performing second-look laparoscopy is not state of the art anymore.

The Effects of Long-Term Dienogest Therapy on In Vitro Fertilization Outcomes in Women with Endometriosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Assessing dienogest's efficacy in endometriosis patients undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF). DATA SOURCES: Systematic search in databases (PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, Google Scholar) until 1 October 2022. STUDY SELECTIONS: Randomized trials and observational studies comparing extended dienogest pre-treatment, no pre-treatment, or gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist pre-treatment in endometriosis-linked IVF. OUTCOME MEASURES: live birth, clinical pregnancy rates, oocytes collected, miscarriage rate, gonadotropin consumption. DATA EXTRACTIONS AND SYNTHESES: Two authors independently assessed eligibility. Dichotomous variables were analyzed via a random-effect model and Mantel-Haenszel method to calculate weighted estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI). I2 statistic gauged study heterogeneity; GRADE criteria evaluated evidence quality. CONCLUSIONS: Out of 191 publications, five studies with 723 participants were included. Uncertainty persists on whether prolonged dienogest affects live birth (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.29 to 6.84; 3 studies, n = 289; I2 86%) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.33, 95% CI 0.31 to 5.65; 3 studies, n = 289; I2 86%) compared to conventional IVF. Moreover, uncertainty remains regarding intervention impact on live birth (RR 1.46, 95% CI 0.63 to 3.37; 1 study, n = 34) and clinical pregnancy rates (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.78 to 2.23; 3 studies, n = 288; I2 0%) versus long-term GnRH agonist therapy before IVF. Given limited data and very low evidence quality, doubts arise about the benefits of long-term dienogest pre-treatment before conventional IVF in endometriosis patients.

Dienogest alone or dienogest combined with estrogens in the treatment of ovarian endometriomas, that is the question. A retrospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: to compare the effects of Dienogest 2 mg (D) alone or combined with estrogens (D + ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg, D + EE; D + estradiol valerate 1-3 mg, D + EV) in terms of symptoms and endometriotic lesions variations. METHODS: This retrospective study included symptomatic patients in reproductive age with ultrasound diagnosis of ovarian endometriomas. Medical therapy for at least 12 months with D, D + EE or D + EV was required. Women were evaluated at baseline visit (V1) and after 6 (V2) and 12 months (V3) of therapy. RESULTS: 297 patients were enrolled (156 in the D group, 58 in the D + EE group, 83 in the D + EV group). Medical treatment leaded to a significant reduction in size of endometriomas after 12 months, with no differences between the three groups. When comparing D and D + EE/D + EV groups, a significant decrease of dysmenorrhea was detected in the D group than in D + EE/D + EV group. Conversely, the reduction of dysuria was more significative in the D + EE/D + EV groups rather than in the D group. Regarding tolerability, treatment associated side effects were reported by 16.2% patients. The most frequent one was uterine bleeding/spotting, significantly higher in the D + EV group. CONCLUSION: Dienogest alone or associated with estrogens (EE/EV) seems to be equally effective in reducing endometriotic lesions mean diameter. The reduction of dysmenorrhea was more significative when D was administered alone, while dysuria seems to improve more when D is associated with estrogens.

Dienogest versus norethisterone acetate in management of endometrial hyperplasia without atypia.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the effectiveness of dienogest (DIE) and norethisterone acetate (NETA) regimens in the treatment of endometrial hyperplasia (EH) without atypia. METHODS: Participants were premenopausal women with irregular uterine bleeding, and endometrial hyperplasia without atypia on endometrial biopsy. Enrolled patients were randomly allocated into two groups: group I got DIE 2 mg/day (orally Visanne) for 14 days (10th to the 25th day of cycle) while group II received between the 16th and 25th day of the cycle, norethisterone acetate (NETA) 15 mg/d (orally Primolut Nor) was administered for 10 days. Both groups continued the therapy for six months. RESULTS: The DIE group showed a higher resolution (32.7%) and regression (57.7%) than NETA group (31% & 37.9%, respectively) with significant regression (p = 0.039). No progression in DIE group while four (6.9%) women in NETA group were recorded a progression to complex type without a significance. Also, NETA group showed a significant persistence rate (22.5%) than DIE group (3.8%) (p = 0.005). Also number in NETA group managed by hysterectomy with significant difference (p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: If used as first-line treatment, Dienogest produces a better rate of regression and a lower incidence of hysterectomy than Norethisterone Acetate does when used in EH without atypia.

Comparison of the effectiveness of Dienogest with medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of pelvic pain and recurrence of endometriosis after laparoscopic surgery.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare the effects of Dienogest and medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) on the recurrence of endometriosis lesions and clinical symptoms in women undergoing laparoscopic surgery. METHODS: This single center clinical trial was conducted among 106 women with endometriosis undergoing laparoscopic surgery who candidate receiving post-surgery hormone therapy. Participants were allocated to two groups. The first group received Dienogest pills (2 mg) daily for the first three months and then cyclic for three months afterward. The second group received MPA pills twice daily (10 mg) for three months and then cyclic for the next three months. Six months after the intervention, the rate of endometriosis recurrence, the size of endometriosis lesions and pelvic pain were assess and compared between two groups. RESULTS: Finally, data were evaluated based on 48 and 53 women in the Dienogest and MPA groups, respectively. After 6 months follow-up assessments the pelvic pain score was significantly lower in Dienogest group than MPA group (P < 0.001). There was not statistically difference between two groups in terms of recurrence rate of endometriosis (P = 0.4). Although the size of endometriosis cyst recurrence was smaller in Dienogest group compared to MPA group (P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: The findings showed that Dienogest treatment has better effect in reducing pelvic pain and the mean size of the recurrent endometriosis lesions after endometriosis laparoscopic surgery when compared to MPA treatment. Although the recurrent rate of endometriosis was similar between these treatments.

Genome-Wide Gene Expression Profiling Reveals the Direct Effect of Dienogest on Ovarian Endometriotic Stromal Cells.

Endometriosis affects up to 10% of women of reproductive age, causing dysmenorrhea, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. The current key drug for endometriosis is dienogest, a progestin with high specificity for the progesterone receptor. To reveal the direct anti-endometriotic effect of dienogest on ovarian endometriotic cells, we investigated the genome-wide gene expression profiles of ovarian endometriotic stromal cells with (Dienogest group) or without dienogest treatment (Control group) and compared the groups' gene expression profiles. We performed a gene ontology (GO) analysis and Ingenuity pathway analysis using these data. To validate the microarray data, we performed real-time RT-PCRs and immunohistochemistry for the differentially expressed genes between the two groups. Of 647 genes differentially expressed between the two groups, 314 genes were upregulated and 333 were downregulated in the Dienogest group versus the Control group. The GO analysis showed that the regulation of macrophage chemotaxis, the collagen catabolic process, and the proteoglycan biosynthetic process are the main biological processes closely associated with the differentially expressed genes. We identified 20 canonical pathways that were most significantly differentially expressed in the Dienogest group versus the Control group. We observed that matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) are the genes in these pathways that are most closely associated with dienogest treatment. Of components involved in the regulation of macrophage chemotaxis, colony-stimulating factor 1 and macrophage-stimulating 1 are potential upstream regulators of MMPs and were observed herein to be suppressed by dienogest. Our results suggest that dienogest may thus exert its anti-endometriotic effect by directly suppressing MMPs.

Quality of life and clinical factors in women with endometriosis, the role of dienogest vs EE/dienogest over time: a single-center study.

PURPOSE: The aims of this observational study were: to assess the relationship between psychological variables, pain, Duration Untreated Endometriosis (DUE) in a sample of women with Endometriosis; and to assess the effect of dienogest 2 mg/daily (DNG) and dienogest/ethinylestradiol 0.03 mg/daily (EE/DNG) on Symptoms, QoL, HRQoL, pain and sexual satisfaction, over time. METHODS: 64 women constituted the study group; (56%) took DNG and (44%) took EE/DNG. VAS, SF-36, EHP-30 and ISS were used to assess endometriosis-associated pelvic pain, QoL, HRQoL and sexual satisfaction, respectively. The study included one follow-up at 18 months. RESULTS: At T0, a longer period of DUE was related both to worst HRQoL and Physical QoL. At T1, a correlation was found between longer DUE and worst HRQoL. At T0, a negative correlation was found between VAS and PCS and between VAS and EHP-30. At T1, the same above correlation was found between VAS and PCS/MCS and VAS and EHP-30 scale. There was a correlation between ISS and VAS. ANOVA showed a reduction in dysmenorrhea, in general pain level and an improvement in emotional wellbeing, relationship with medical profession, and PCS over time, regardless to type of treatment. Moreover, a significant time × treatment group interaction for dysmenorrhea was found. CONCLUSION: DUE and pain are important variables related to psychological aspects of women with endometriosis. Treatment with both DNG and EE/DNG may have positive effects on the QoL, HRQoL and symptoms. Moreover, DNG seems to have a greater effect than EE/DNG on dyspareunia reduction over time.

Pretreatment of Dienogest for Women with Endometriosis in in vitro Fertilization: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Dienogest (DNG) was demonstrated to be comparable to gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRH-a) in controlling symptoms of endometriosis. GnRH-a is used before in vitro fertilization (IVF) in women with endometriosis to improve pregnancy outcomes. We aimed to determine the effect of DNG pretreatment on IVF outcomes, including number of mature oocytes, rate of clinical pregnancies, and rate of live births in women with endometriosis. METHODS: All studies involving DNG, IVF, and endometriosis were searched from the PubMed; Ovid/MEDLINE, Wanfang, CQVIP, China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases; and ClinicalTrials.gov. The study population was women with endometriosis in IVF. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included. All included studies comprised a DNG group and a control group. The outcomes were number of mature oocytes, rate of clinical pregnancies, and rate of live births. We calculated the odds ratio or mean difference and 95% confidence interval for each study and used a random-effects model to estimate the results. RESULTS: Five articles were screened by the search strategy. One article without a control group was excluded. Finally, four articles with 422 patients were included. No significant differences in number of mature oocytes (MD = -1.27, 95% CI: -3.63 to 1.09, I2 = 91%), the rate of clinical pregnancies (odds ratio = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.33-3.47, I2 = 84%), or the rate of live births (odds ratio = 1.09, 95% CI: 0.34-3.46, I2 = 84%) were found between the DNG group and the control group. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment with DNG for women with endometriosis who underwent IVF could not improve the number of mature oocytes, the rate of clinical pregnancies, or the rate of live births.

Comparison of the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of dienogest and GnRH-a after endometriosis surgery. METHODS: Patients with endometriosis who were admitted to our hospital from December 2020 to March 2022 were randomly collected. A total of 81 patients were collected and divided into 40 cases in the control group and 41 cases in the observation group. Among them, the control group was treated with GnRH-a drug, and the observation group was treated with dienogest (DNG). RESULTS: The study found that the therapeutic effects of the two drugs were basically the same in patients with endometriosis. The VAS and Kupperman scores of the control group were 0.78 ± 0.8, 3.9 ± 1.84, P < 0.05, respectively; the VAS and Kupperman scores of the observation group were 0.73 ± 0.78, 1.55, respectively ± 1.24, P < 0.05, the difference was statistically significant.In the case of postoperative recurrence, the observation group was better than the control group, with 8 cases of recurrence in the control group and 2 cases of recurrence in the observation group, P < 0.05. CONCLUSION: In the comparison of postoperative efficacy of the two drugs on patients with endometriosis, dienogest is better than GnRH-a adjuvant drug in postoperative recurrence, and has a good improvement and application, which is worthy of further promotion in clinical practice.

Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Dienogest Compared with Combined Oral Contraceptives after Surgery for Endometriosis.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of different strategies, including the dienogest (DNG) and combined oral contraceptives (COC) therapy, for the prevention of endometriosis recurrence after surgery. DESIGN: A decision tree model was created. The analysis was based on data from a healthcare provider in China. Model inputs were derived from published data. The end points included incremental cost effectiveness ratio, net monetary benefit (NMB), and incremental NMB associated with prevention of recurrence. The uncertainty was assessed through one way and probabilistic sensitivity analysis. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards 2022 checklist was used to assess quality of the reporting. SETTING: China healthcare system. PATIENTS: Individuals undergoing laparoscopic surgery for endometriosis. INTERVENTIONS: DNG vs COC. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The base case analysis showed that hormone supression via DNG resulted in 0.7493 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) at a cost of $1625.49 compared with COC, which resulted in 0.7346 QALYs at a cost of $343.61. The incremental cost effectiveness ratio was $87 679.89 per additional QALY gained and the DNG treatment was associated with an incremental NMB of -$731.39. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated that DNG is not cost-effective in most cases at a threshold consistent with World Health Organisation recommendations of $37 653/QALY. CONCLUSION: The result of our present analysis suggests that the DNG might not be cost-effective for the prevention of endometriosis recurrence after surgery in China.

Is dienogest a convenient treatment option for cesarean scar endometriosis or should it be treated surgically?

OBJECTIVES: Endometriosis-related conditions such as subcutaneous endometriosis have been frequently seen in recent years, and dienogest or surgical excision is generally preferred as a treatment option. Our aim in this study is to determine which treatment option will be more effective in reducing the symptoms of patients with cesarean scar endometriosis. Study design This prospective study was performed with 21 patients diagnosed with cesarean scar endometriosis. The demographic features of the patients, lesion sizes before and after medical and surgical treatment, VAS scores and Ca-125 levels were recorded. VAS scores and lesion sizes were compared before-after medical treatment and before-after surgery in same group. RESULTS: A total of 18 women were identified, with a mean age of 32.3 ± 5.7 years. No significant decrease in lesion size was observed in the 1st and 6th-month controls after the use of dienogest (p > 0,05), while a significant decrease in VAS scores was detected (p < 0,05). After surgery, the decrease in both lesion size and VAS scores was found statistically significant (p < 0,05). CONCLUSION: Dienogest, which is frequently used in the medical treatment of pelvic and ovarian endometriosis, reduces pain minimally in cesarean scar endometriosis but does not provide a change in lesion size. Therefore, surgical treatment of cesarean scar endometriosis seems to be more effective in reducing pain and decreasing the size of the lesions.

Randomized study on the effectiveness of nomegestrol acetate plus 17ß-estradiol oral contraceptive versus dienogest oral pill in women with suspected endometriosis­associated chronic pelvic pain.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects of a combined oral contraceptive containing 1.5 mg 17b-estradiol (E2) and 2.5 mg nomegestrol acetate (NOMAC) or 2 mg/daily dienogest (DNG) oral progestin on endometriosis-associated chronic pelvic pain (CPP) and on the quality of life (QoL) and sexual function, by a randomized study design. METHODS: The E2/NOMAC group and DNG group included 99 and 98 women, respectively. The levels of CPP were measured by the visual analogic scale (VAS). The QoL scores were investigated by the Short Form-36 questionnaire (SF-36). Finally, sexual function was studied using the Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI), while sexual distress was studied by the Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS). The study had 3, 6 and 12-month follow-ups. RESULTS: The intra-group analysis showed an improvement of the VAS score from baseline to the 12-month follow-up in the women of both groups (p < 0.001). The inter-group comparison showed a similar improvement of CPP (p = 0.06). Women on DNG had better SF-36 somatic (p < 0.01) and FSFI scores (p < 0.006) than women on E2/NOMAC at the 6- and 12-month follow-ups. CONCLUSIONS: The results support the efficacy of both hormonal treatments, even if DNG was more effective than E2/NOMAC in a limited intergroup comparison.

Nandrolone decanoate safely combats catabolism in burned patients: A new potential indication after recall.

INTRODUCTION: The hyper-catabolic state is a devastating pathophysiological response to severe injury, infection or burns. Nandrolone decanoate (ND) is a potent anabolic steroid have many clinical indications, but not investigated in burn injuries yet. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective randomized control study included 40 burned patients who were treated in Burn unit from burn injuries ranged from 20 to 40%. Both groups are objectively assessed, clinically and laboratory during treatment period till full recovery from burns' injury. Recall assessment of the drug safety after many years is achieved. RESULTS: ND showed highly significant results supporting its use in combating catabolic insults in burns patient. Both clinical findings and laboratory findings are correlated and highly support the use of ND in burns as new effective and safe long-lasting indication. CONCLUSION: This study results showed preservation of lean body mass and protein partition, as well as the near normal nitrogen balance in burn patients. Study proposes that nandrolone decanoate could be used in safe and effective way to combat hypercatabolic impact in burn injury.

Impact of perioperative use of GnRH agonist or dienogest on ovarian reserve after cystectomy for endometriomas: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Ovarian endometrioma is a common gynecological disease that is often treated with surgery or hormonal treatment. Ovarian cystectomy, a surgical procedure for ovarian endometrioma, can result in impaired ovarian reserve. METHODS: We conducted a randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy of hormonal treatment [gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) or dienogest (DNG)] for preserving ovarian reserve after cystectomy for ovarian endometrioma. The primary endpoint was the level of serum Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) as a marker of ovarian reserve. RESULTS: Before and after laparoscopic surgery, 22 patients in the GnRHa group and 27 patients in the DNG group were administered hormonal treatment for a total of 4 months. After 1-year follow-up, >60% of the patients in the DNG group retained over 70% of their pretreatment AMH levels, whereas no patient in the GnRHa group retained their AMH levels after cystectomy (P < 0.01). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) is a key cytokine involved in inflammation. Compared with the GnRHa group, patients in the DNG group had lower IL-6 levels at the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our data revealed that DNG is more effective than GnRHa in preserving ovarian reserve after cystectomy of ovarian endometrioma. This is achieved through the reduction of the inflammatory response during the perioperative period and other endometriosis-related inflammatory reactions. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The registration number of this trial is UMIN-CTR, UMIN000018569, registered 6 August 2015, https://upload.umin.ac.jp/cgi-open-bin/ctr_e/ctr_view.cgi?recptno=R000021492 , and Japan Registry of Clinical Trials, jRCTs041180140, registered 29 March 2019, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs041180140 . This randomized controlled trial was conducted in accordance with the CONSORT guidelines.

Dienogest-induced major depressive disorder with suicidal ideation: A case report.

RATIONALE: Dienogest is a type of progestin used for the treatment of endometriosis (EM). However, a significant adverse effect of dienogest is depression; therefore, assessing for a history of mood disorders is recommended before prescribing the drug. Herein, we present the case of a patient with no history of psychiatric disorders who was diagnosed with dienogest-induced major depressive disorder. This case emphasizes the importance of close monitoring for negative mood changes in patients taking dienogest. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 41-year-old woman underwent surgery for EM. Postoperatively, her gynecologist prescribed dienogest (2 mg/d) to control EM symptoms. Two months after the initiation of dienogest, she manifested insomnia almost daily, gradually became depressed, lost interest in all activities, had incessant cries, and repeatedly thought of death. She had no history of major physical or psychiatric disorders. DIAGNOSIS: Major depressive disorder, single episode, severe. INTERVENTIONS: A psychiatric consultation was recommended, an antidepressant was prescribed, and dienogest was discontinued. OUTCOMES: Two weeks later, there was significant improvement in the symptoms, and after 4 weeks, she remained in a stable mood with no suicidal thoughts. She was followed up for 13 months with a maintenance dose of escitalopram (5 -10mg/d), until the psychiatrist recommended treatment discontinuation, with a confirmed state of remission. LESSONS: This was a case of dienogest-induced depression in a patient with no history of mood disorders. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of the occurrence of severe depression in progestin users regardless of their previous history.

Dienogest vs GnRH agonists as postoperative therapy after laparoscopic eradication of deep infiltrating endometriosis with bowel and parametrial surgery: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The recurrence of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) after its surgical excision is a big problem: postoperative treatment is crucial. OBJECTIVE: To compare two postoperative treatments: Dienogest and GnRH agonists. DESIGN: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT). PATIENTS: 146 women submitted to laparoscopic eradication of DIE with bowel and parametrial surgery. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into two groups. Group A (n = 81) received Triptorelin or Leuprorelin 3.75 mg every 4 weeks for 6 months. Group B (n = 65) received Dienogest 2 mg/day for at least 6 months. A first interview made after six months valued compliance to therapy, treatment tolerability, pain improvement, and side effects. A second interview at 30 ± 6 months valued pain relapse, imaging relapse, and pregnancy rate. MAIN OUTCOMES: The primary outcome was to demonstrate the non-inferiority of Dienogest about the reduction in pain recurrence. Secondary outcomes were differences in terms of treatment tolerability, side effects, imaging relapse rate, and pregnancy rate. RESULTS: Both Dienogest and GnRH agonists were associated with a highly significant reduction of pain at 6 and 30 months, without any significant difference (p < .001). About treatment tolerability, a more satisfactory profile was reported with Dienogest (p = .026). No difference in terms of clinical relapse, imaging relapse, and live births was found. CONCLUSIONS: Dienogest has proven to be as effective as GnRH agonists in preventing recurrence of DIE and associated pelvic pain after surgery. Also, it is better tolerated by patients.