Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 2.557
Filter
1.
Clin Respir J ; 18(5): e13754, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693702

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Under the prevention and control measures of COVID-19, the epidemiological situation of respiratory pathogens is not well known. Understanding the patterns of respiratory pathogens epidemiology under the prevention and control measures of COVID-19 is important to guide resource allocation for existing and future treatment and prevention strategies. METHODS: In total, 659 fever outpatients nasopharyngeal swabs were collected at fever illness onset during June in 2022 at the First Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University. Swabs were tested by real-time fluorescent single-tube multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) for 12 respiratory pathogens. Moreover, 108 of the 659 swabs were tested for influenza virus antigen. RESULTS: At least one pathogen was detected in 477 (72.38%) of 659 fever outpatients with multiple pathogens identified in 25 (3.79%). The highest multiple infectious pattern is parainfluenza virus in combination with influenza (five cases). Influenza A virus (IFA), human rhinovirus (HRV), and parainfluenza virus are the three leading virus pathogens with proportions of 64.64%, 5.01%, and 2.88%. School-age children and adult groups have the highest pathogens positivity rate of 81.28% and 83.87%. CONCLUSION: A high proportion of adolescents and adults has respiratory pathogens detected during fever illnesses during June in 2022 under the prevention and control of COVID-19. These data indicate that diagnosis, prevention, and control of respiratory tract infection should be paid attention under the prevention and control of COVID-19.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Influenza, Human , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/prevention & control , Influenza, Human/virology , China/epidemiology , Adult , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Child , Adolescent , Child, Preschool , Young Adult , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Aged , Infant , Nasopharynx/virology
2.
J Med Virol ; 96(5): e29676, 2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38747018

ABSTRACT

The SARS-CoV-2 VIrus PERsistence (VIPER) study investigated the presence of long-lasting SARS-CoV-2 RNA in plasma, stool, urine, and nasopharyngeal samples in COVID-19 survivors. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA reverse transcription polymerase chain reactions (RT-PCR) were analyzed within plasma, stool, urine, and nasopharyngeal swab samples in COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID symptoms and a comparison group of COVID-19 survivors without post-COVID symptoms matched by age, sex, body mass index and vaccination status. Participants self-reported the presence of any post-COVID symptom (defined as a symptom that started no later than 3 months after the initial infection). Fifty-seven (57.9% women, age: 51.1, standard deviation [SD]: 10.4 years) previously hospitalized COVID-19 survivors with post-COVID symptoms and 55 (56.4% women, age: 50.0, SD: 12.8 years) matched individuals who had a past SARS-CoV-2 infection without post-COVID symptoms were evaluated 27 (SD 7.5) and 26 (SD 8.7) months after hospital discharge, respectively. The presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA was identified in three nasopharyngeal samples of patients with post-COVID symptoms (5.2%) but not in plasma, stool, or urine samples. Thus, SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not identified in any sample of survivors without post-COVID symptoms. The most prevalent post-COVID symptoms consisted of fatigue (93%), dyspnea, and pain (both, 87.7%). This study did not find SARS-CoV-2 RNA in plasma, stool, or urine samples, 2 years after the infection. A prevalence of 5.2% of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in nasopharyngeal samples, suggesting a potential active or recent reinfection, was found in patients with post-COVID symptoms. These results do not support the association between SARS-CoV-2 RNA in plasma, stool, urine, or nasopharyngeal swab samples and post-COVID symptomatology in the recruited population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Feces , Hospitalization , Nasopharynx , RNA, Viral , SARS-CoV-2 , Survivors , Humans , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/complications , Female , Male , RNA, Viral/blood , RNA, Viral/genetics , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Nasopharynx/virology , Adult , Feces/virology , Aged
3.
J Gen Virol ; 105(5)2024 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38717926

ABSTRACT

Background. Respiratory tract infections are among the most important causes of mortality and morbidity in children worldwide. The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the distribution of seasonal respiratory viruses as in all areas of life. In this study, we have aimed to evaluate the changes in the rates of seasonal respiratory viruses with the onset of the pandemic.Methods. This study included patients who were admitted to the Pediatrics Clinic of Eskisehir Osmangazi University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between December 2018 and February 2022 with respiratory tract infections and in whom pathogens were detected from nasopharyngeal swab samples analysed by multiplex PCR method.Results. A total of 833 respiratory tract pathogens were detected in 684 cases consisting of male (55.3 %), and female (44.7 %), patients with a total mean age of 42 months. Single pathogen was revealed in 550, and multiple pathogens in 134 cases. Intensive care was needed in 14 % of the cases. Most frequently influenza A/B, rhinovirus and respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) were detected during the pre-pandemic period, while rhinovirus, RSV, and adenovirus were observed during the lockdown period. In the post-lockdown period, the incidence rates of rhinovirus, RSV, human bocavirus (HboV) (12 %), influenza virus infections increased, and patients with RSV and bocavirus infections required intensive care hospitalization.Conclusion. It is thought that the COVID-9 pandemic lockdown measures may have an impact on the distribution of seasonal respiratory viruses, especially RSV and influenza. Current, prospective and large case series regarding the mechanism of action and dynamics are needed.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Respiratory Tract Infections , SARS-CoV-2 , Seasons , Humans , Female , Male , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/virology , Child, Preschool , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Infant , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Child , Rhinovirus/isolation & purification , Rhinovirus/genetics , Nasopharynx/virology , Adolescent , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Pandemics , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Syncytial Virus Infections/virology
4.
Int J Infect Dis ; 143: 107034, 2024 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561041

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the viral load (VL) using cycle threshold (Ct) in patients infected with influenza A (H3N2). METHODS: This prospective study was conducted during the 2022-2023 influenza season in sentinel, non-sentinel, and hospitalized patients of Castilla y León (Spain). Respiratory samples were obtained from nasopharyngeal swabs and analyzed by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction specific for influenza A (H3N2) to obtain the Ct value. RESULTS: A total of 1047 individuals were enrolled (174 [16.6%] sentinel, 200 [19.1%] non-sentinel, 673 [64.3%] hospitalized). The mean Ct value was lower in infants, young children, and in the elderly, with a sharp increase in the last from 65 years until 90 years. In addition, the lower Ct values were observed in non-sentinel patients and then in hospitalized patients, probably because non-sentinel are outpatients in the acute phase of the influenza infection. CONCLUSIONS: A higher VL (lower Ct value) is related to the extreme ages of life: children and the elderly. Furthermore, a higher VL is related with the care setting, being probably higher in outpatients because they are in the acute phase of the disease and slightly lower in hospitalized patients because they are attended during the post-acute phase.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype , Influenza, Human , Viral Load , Humans , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Influenza, Human/virology , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/isolation & purification , Influenza A Virus, H3N2 Subtype/genetics , Spain/epidemiology , Prospective Studies , Child, Preschool , Infant , Child , Male , Female , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Seasons , Age Factors , Hospitalization , Infant, Newborn , Nasopharynx/virology
5.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(5): e0416623, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38557102

ABSTRACT

Throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, extensive research has been conducted on SARS-COV-2 to elucidate its genome, prognosis, and possible treatments. However, few looked at the microbial markers that could be explored in infected patients and that could predict possible disease severity. The aim of this study is to compare the nasopharyngeal microbiota of healthy subjects, moderate, under medication, and recovered SARS-COV-2 patients. In 2020, 38 nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from 6 healthy subjects, 14 moderates, 10 under medication and 8 recovered SARS-COV-2 patients at the Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital Riyadh. Metatranscriptomic sequencing was performed using Minion Oxford nanopore sequencing. No significant difference in alpha as well as beta diversity was observed among all four categories. Nevertheless, we have found that Streptococcus spp including Streptococcus pneumoniae and Streptococcus thermophilus were among the top 15 most abundant species detected in COVID-19 patients but not in healthy subjects. The genus Staphylococcus was found to be associated with COVID-19 patients compared to healthy subjects. Furthermore, the abundance of Leptotrichia was significantly higher in healthy subjects compared to recovered patients. Corynebacterium on the other hand, was associated with under-medication patients. Taken together, our study revealed no differences in the overall microbial composition between healthy subjects and COVID-19 patients. Significant differences were seen only at specific taxonomic level. Future studies should explore the nasopharyngeal microbiota between controls and COVID-19 patients while controlling for confounders including age, gender, and comorbidities; since these latter could affect the results and accordingly the interpretation.IMPORTANCEIn this work, no significant difference in the microbial diversity was seen between healthy subjects and COVID-19 patients. Changes in specific taxa including Leptotrichia, Staphylococcus, and Corynebacterium were only observed. Leptotrichia was significantly higher in healthy subjects, whereas Staphylococcus and Corynebacterium were mostly associated with COVID-19, and specifically with under-medication SARS-COV-2 patients, respectively. Although the COVID-19 pandemic has ended, the SARS-COV-2 virus is continuously evolving and the emergence of new variants causing more severe disease should be always kept in mind. Microbial markers in SARS-COV-2 infected patients can be useful in the early suspicion of the disease, predicting clinical outcomes, framing hospital and intensive care unit admission as well as, risk stratification. Data on which microbial marker to tackle is still controversial and more work is needed, hence the importance of this study.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing , Microbiota , Nasopharynx , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/microbiology , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Nasopharynx/virology , Microbiota/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Adult , Metagenomics/methods , Metagenome , Aged , Bacteria/classification , Bacteria/genetics , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Severity of Illness Index , Streptococcus pneumoniae/genetics , Streptococcus pneumoniae/isolation & purification , Streptococcus pneumoniae/classification
6.
Braz J Biol ; 84: e265550, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38451627

ABSTRACT

Despite of the global unity against COVID-19 pandemic, the threat of SARS-CoV-2 variants on the lives of human being is still not over. SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has urged the need of rapid viral detection at earliest. To cope with gradually expanding scenario of SARS-CoV-2, accurate diagnosis is extremely crucial factor which should be noticed by international health organizations. Limited research followed by sporadic marketing of SARS-CoV-2 rapid pharmaceutical detection kits raises critical questions against quality assurance and quality control measures. Herein we aimed to interrogate effectivity and specificity analysis of SARS-CoV-2 pharmaceutical rapid detection kits (nasopharyngeal swab based) using conventional gold standard triple target real-time polymerase chain reaction (USFDA approved). A cross-sectional study was conducted over 1500 suspected SARS-CoV-2 patients. 100 real time-PCR confirmed patients were evaluated for pharmaceutical RDT kits based upon nasopharyngeal swab based kits. The SARS-CoV-2 nasopharyngeal swab based rapid diagnostic kit (NSP RDTs) analysis showed 78% reactivity. Among real time PCR confirmed negative subjects, 49.3% represented false positivity. The positive predictive analysis revealed 67.82%, while negative predictive values were 64.40%. The NSP RDTs showed limited sensitivities and specificities as compared to gold standard real time PCR. Valid and authentic detection of SARS-CoV-2 is deemed necessary for accurate COVID-19 surveillance across the globe. Current study highlights the potential consequences of inadequate detection of SARS-CoV-2 and emerging novel mutants, compromising vaccine preventable diseases. Current study emphasizes need to wake higher authorities including strategic organizations for designing adequate measures to prevent future SARS-CoV-2 epidemics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Reagent Kits, Diagnostic , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/diagnosis , Cross-Sectional Studies , Nasopharynx/virology , Pakistan , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Sensitivity and Specificity
7.
Microbiol Spectr ; 12(5): e0406823, 2024 May 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38497716

ABSTRACT

Matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) could aid the diagnosis of acute respiratory infections (ARIs) owing to its affordability and high-throughput capacity. MALDI-TOF MS has been proposed for use on commonly available respiratory samples, without specialized sample preparation, making this technology especially attractive for implementation in low-resource regions. Here, we assessed the utility of MALDI-TOF MS in differentiating severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vs non-COVID acute respiratory infections (NCARIs) in a clinical lab setting in Kazakhstan. Nasopharyngeal swabs were collected from inpatients and outpatients with respiratory symptoms and from asymptomatic controls (ACs) in 2020-2022. PCR was used to differentiate SARS-CoV-2+ and NCARI cases. MALDI-TOF MS spectra were obtained for a total of 252 samples (115 SARS-CoV-2+, 98 NCARIs, and 39 ACs) without specialized sample preparation. In our first sub-analysis, we followed a published protocol for peak preprocessing and machine learning (ML), trained on publicly available spectra from South American SARS-CoV-2+ and NCARI samples. In our second sub-analysis, we trained ML models on a peak intensity matrix representative of both South American (SA) and Kazakhstan (Kaz) samples. Applying the established MALDI-TOF MS pipeline "as is" resulted in a high detection rate for SARS-CoV-2+ samples (91.0%), but low accuracy for NCARIs (48.0%) and ACs (67.0%) by the top-performing random forest model. After re-training of the ML algorithms on the SA-Kaz peak intensity matrix, the accuracy of detection by the top-performing support vector machine with radial basis function kernel model was at 88.0%, 95.0%, and 78% for the Kazakhstan SARS-CoV-2+, NCARI, and AC subjects, respectively, with a SARS-CoV-2 vs rest receiver operating characteristic area under the curve of 0.983 [0.958, 0.987]; a high differentiation accuracy was maintained for the South American SARS-CoV-2 and NCARIs. MALDI-TOF MS/ML is a feasible approach for the differentiation of ARI without specialized sample preparation. The implementation of MALDI-TOF MS/ML in a real clinical lab setting will necessitate continuous optimization to keep up with the rapidly evolving landscape of ARI.IMPORTANCEIn this proof-of-concept study, the authors used matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) and machine learning (ML) to identify and distinguish acute respiratory infections (ARI) caused by SARS-CoV-2 versus other pathogens in low-resource clinical settings, without the need for specialized sample preparation. The ML models were trained on a varied collection of MALDI-TOF MS spectra from studies conducted in Kazakhstan and South America. Initially, the MALDI-TOF MS/ML pipeline, trained exclusively on South American samples, exhibited diminished effectiveness in recognizing non-SARS-CoV-2 infections from Kazakhstan. Incorporation of spectral signatures from Kazakhstan substantially increased the accuracy of detection. These results underscore the potential of employing MALDI-TOF MS/ML in resource-constrained settings to augment current approaches for detecting and differentiating ARI.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Machine Learning , Respiratory Tract Infections , SARS-CoV-2 , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization , Humans , Spectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-Ionization/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , Respiratory Tract Infections/diagnosis , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Kazakhstan , Middle Aged , Male , Sensitivity and Specificity , Adult , Nasopharynx/virology , Female
8.
Curr Opin Infect Dis ; 37(3): 170-175, 2024 Jun 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38437245

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Prevention of acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) in children is a global health priority, as these remain a leading cause of pediatric morbidity and mortality throughout the world. As new products and strategies to prevent respiratory infections caused by important pathogens such as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), influenza, respiratory syncytial virus and pneumococcus are advancing, increasing evidence suggests that these and other respiratory viruses and pneumococci may exhibit interactions that are associated with altered colonization and disease dynamics. We aim to review recent data evaluating interactions between respiratory viruses and pneumococci in the upper respiratory tract and their potential impact on pneumococcal colonization patterns and disease outcomes. RECENT FINDINGS: While interactions between influenza infection and subsequent increased susceptibility and transmissibility of colonizing pneumococci have been widely reported in the literature, emerging evidence suggests that human rhinovirus, SARS-CoV-2, and other viruses may also exhibit interactions with pneumococci and alter pneumococcal colonization patterns. Additionally, colonizing pneumococci may play a role in modifying outcomes associated with respiratory viral infections. Recent evidence suggests that vaccination with pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, and prevention of colonization with pneumococcal serotypes included in these vaccines, may be associated with reducing the risk of subsequent viral infection and the severity of the associated illnesses. SUMMARY: Understanding the direction and dynamics of viral-pneumococcal interactions may elucidate the potential effects of existing and emerging viral and bacterial vaccines and other preventive strategies on the health impact of these important respiratory pathogens.


Subject(s)
Nasopharynx , Pneumococcal Infections , Respiratory Tract Infections , Streptococcus pneumoniae , Humans , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , Child , Pneumococcal Infections/prevention & control , Pneumococcal Infections/microbiology , Nasopharynx/microbiology , Nasopharynx/virology , COVID-19/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Pneumococcal Vaccines , Child, Preschool , Coinfection/microbiology , Virus Diseases
9.
Virol Sin ; 39(2): 290-300, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38331038

ABSTRACT

Coxsackievirus B3 (CVB3) is the pathogen causing hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD), which manifests across a spectrum of clinical severity from mild to severe. However, CVB3-infected mouse models mainly demonstrate viral myocarditis and pancreatitis, failing to replicate human HFMD symptoms. Although several enteroviruses have been evaluated in Syrian hamsters and rhesus monkeys, there is no comprehensive data on CVB3. In this study, we have first tested the susceptibility of Syrian hamsters to CVB3 infection via different routes. The results showed that Syrian hamsters were successfully infected with CVB3 by intraperitoneal injection or nasal drip, leading to nasopharyngeal colonization, acute severe pathological injury, and typical HFMD symptoms. Notably, the nasal drip group exhibited a longer viral excretion cycle and more severe pathological damage. In the subsequent study, rhesus monkeys infected with CVB3 through nasal drips also presented signs of HFMD symptoms, viral excretion, serum antibody conversion, viral nucleic acids and antigens, and the specific organ damages, particularly in the heart. Surprisingly, there were no significant differences in myocardial enzyme levels, and the clinical symptoms resembled those often associated with common, mild infections. In summary, the study successfully developed severe Syrian hamsters and mild rhesus monkey models for CVB3-induced HFMD. These models could serve as a basis for understanding the disease pathogenesis, conducting pre-trial prevention and evaluation, and implementing post-exposure intervention.


Subject(s)
Disease Models, Animal , Enterovirus B, Human , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease , Macaca mulatta , Mesocricetus , Animals , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease/virology , Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease/pathology , Enterovirus B, Human/pathogenicity , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Cricetinae , Female , Virus Shedding , Nasopharynx/virology , Male
10.
J Pediatric Infect Dis Soc ; 12(5): 282-289, 2023 May 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37099765

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Human bocavirus 1 (HBoV1) is frequently codetected with other viruses, and detected in asymptomatic children. Thus, the burden of HBoV1 respiratory tract infections (RTI) has been unknown. Using HBoV1-mRNA to indicate true HBoV1 RTI, we assessed the burden of HBoV1 in hospitalized children and the impact of viral codetections, compared with respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). METHODS: Over 11 years, we enrolled 4879 children <16 years old admitted with RTI. Nasopharyngeal aspirates were analyzed with polymerase chain reaction for HBoV1-DNA, HBoV1-mRNA, and 19 other pathogens. RESULTS: HBoV1-mRNA was detected in 2.7% (130/4850) samples, modestly peaking in autumn and winter. Forty-three percent with HBoV1 mRNA were 12-17 months old, and only 5% were <6 months old. A total of 73.8% had viral codetections. It was more likely to detect HBoV1-mRNA if HBoV1-DNA was detected alone (odds ratio [OR]: 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.7-8.9) or with 1 viral codetection (OR: 1.9, 95% CI: 1.1-3.3), compared to ≥2 codetections. Codetection of severe viruses like RSV had lower odds for HBoV1-mRNA (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.19-0.61). The yearly lower RTI hospitalization rate per 1000 children <5 years was 0.7 for HBoV1-mRNA and 8.7 for RSV. CONCLUSIONS: True HBoV1 RTI is most likely when HBoV1-DNA is detected alone, or with 1 codetected virus. Hospitalization due to HBoV1 LRTI is 10-12 times less common than RSV.


Subject(s)
Hospitalization , Human bocavirus , Humans , Child , Human bocavirus/genetics , Human bocavirus/isolation & purification , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/virology , RNA, Messenger , Nasopharynx/virology , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Parvoviridae Infections/diagnosis , Parvoviridae Infections/epidemiology , Seasons
13.
Viruses ; 14(11)2022 10 31.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36366518

ABSTRACT

The Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 spreads more easily than earlier variants, possibly as a result of a higher viral load in the upper respiratory tract and oral cavity. Hence, we investigated whether the Omicron variant generates a higher viral load than that of the Delta variant in saliva and nasopharynx. Both specimens were collected from 52 Omicron and 17 Delta cases at two time points one week apart and analyzed by qRT-PCR. Viral load was measured as 10 log RNA genome copies per 1000 human cells according to the WHO reference standard. We found that Omicron cases carried a higher viral load and had more sustained viral shedding compared to the Delta cases, especially in the nasopharynx.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Saliva , Humans , Nasopharynx/virology , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , Saliva/virology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Viral Load
14.
Environ Microbiol ; 24(10): 4725-4737, 2022 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36065993

ABSTRACT

SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis is a cornerstone for the management of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Numerous studies have assessed saliva performance over nasopharyngeal sampling (NPS), but data in young children are still rare. We explored saliva performance for SARS-CoV-2 detection by RT-PCR according to the time interval from initial symptoms or patient serological status. We collected 509 NPS and saliva paired samples at initial diagnosis from 166 children under 12 years of age (including 57 children under 6), 106 between 12 and 17, and 237 adults. In children under 12, overall detection rate for SARS-CoV-2 was comparable in saliva and NPS, with an overall agreement of 89.8%. Saliva sensitivity was significantly lower than that of NPS (77.1% compared to 95.8%) in pre-school and school-age children but regained 96% when considering seronegative children only. This pattern was also observed to a lesser degree in adolescents but not in adults. Sensitivity of saliva was independent of symptoms, in contrary to NPS, whose sensitivity decreased significantly in asymptomatic subjects. Performance of saliva is excellent in children under 12 at early stages of infection. This reinforces saliva as a collection method for early and unbiased SARS-CoV-2 detection and a less invasive alternative for young children.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Saliva , Adolescent , Adult , Child , Child, Preschool , Humans , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Nasopharynx/virology , Saliva/virology , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification
15.
BMC Infect Dis ; 22(1): 697, 2022 Aug 18.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35982419

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: High cost of commercial RNA extraction kits limits the testing efficiency of SARS-CoV-2. Here, we developed a simple nucleic acid extraction method for the detection of SARS-CoV-2 directly from nasopharyngeal swab samples. METHODS: A pH sensitive dye was used as the end point detection method. The obvious colour changes between positive and negative reactions eliminates the need of other equipment. RESULTS: Clinical testing using 260 samples showed 92.7% sensitivity (95% CI 87.3-96.3%) and 93.6% specificity (95% CI 87.3-97.4%) of RT-LAMP. CONCLUSIONS: The simple RNA extraction method minimizes the need for any extensive laboratory set-up. We suggest combining this simple nucleic acid extraction method and RT-LAMP technology as the point-of care diagnostic tool.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing , COVID-19 , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Testing/methods , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nasopharynx/virology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , Point-of-Care Systems , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/genetics , RNA, Viral/isolation & purification , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity
16.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 12612, 2022 07 23.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35871257

ABSTRACT

Saliva has been demonstrated as feasible alternative to naso-oropharyngeal swab (NOS) for SARS-CoV-2 detection through reverse transcription quantitative/real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR). This study compared the diagnostic agreement of conventional NOS, saliva with RNA extraction (SE) and saliva without RNA extraction (SalivaDirect) processing for RT-qPCR in identifying SARS-CoV-2. All techniques were also compared, as separate index tests, to a composite reference standard (CRS) where positive and negative results were defined as SARS-CoV-2 detection in either one or no sample, respectively. Of 517 paired samples, SARS-CoV-2 was detected in 150 (29.01%) NOS and 151 (29.21%) saliva specimens. The saliva-based tests were noted to have a sensitivity, specificity and accuracy (95% confidence interval) of 92.67% (87.26%, 96.28%), 97.55% (95.40%, 98.87%) and 96.13% (94.09%, 97.62%), respectively, for SE RT-qPCR and 91.33% (85.64%, 95.30%), 98.91% (97.23%, 99.70%) and 96.71% (94.79%, 98.07%), respectively, for SalivaDirect RT-qPCR compared to NOS RT-qPCR. Compared to CRS, all platforms demonstrated statistically similar diagnostic performance. These findings suggest that both conventional and streamlined saliva RT-qPCR are at least non-inferior to conventional NOS RT-qPCR in detecting SARS-CoV-2.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nasopharynx/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Saliva/virology , Clinical Laboratory Techniques/methods , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , RNA, Viral/genetics , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Saliva/chemistry , Sensitivity and Specificity , Specimen Handling/methods
17.
J Korean Med Sci ; 37(11): e88, 2022 Mar 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35315599

ABSTRACT

Nasopharyngeal swabs have been widely to prevent the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing is a generally safe and well-tolerated procedure, but numerous complications have been reported in the media. Therefore, the present study aimed to review and document adverse events and suggest procedural references to minimize preventable but often underestimated risks. A total of 27 articles were selected for the review of 842 related documents in PubMed, Embase, and KoreaMed. The complications related to nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing were reported to be rarely happened, ranging from 0.0012 to 0.026%. Frequently documented adverse events were retained swabs, epistaxis, and cerebrospinal fluid leakage, often associated with high-risk factors, including severe septal deviations, pre-existing skull base defects, and previous sinus or transsphenoidal pituitary surgery. Appropriate techniques based on sufficient anatomical knowledge are mandatory for clinicians to perform nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing. The nasal floor can be predicted by the line between the nostril and external ear canal. For safe testing, the angle of swab insertion in the nasal passage should remain within 30° of the nasal floor. The swab was gently inserted along the nasal septum just above the nasal floor to the nasopharynx and remained on the nasopharynx for several seconds before removal. Forceful insertion should be attempted, and alternative examinations should be considered, especially in vulnerable patients. In conclusion, patients and clinicians should be aware of rare but possible complications and associated high-risk factors. The suggested procedural pearls enable more comfortable and safe nasopharyngeal COVID-19 testing for both clinicians and patients.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , Nasopharynx/virology , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Specimen Handling/adverse effects , Humans , Nasal Cavity/anatomy & histology , Nasal Cavity/virology , Nasopharynx/anatomy & histology , Specimen Handling/methods
18.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 3775, 2022 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260588

ABSTRACT

Loop-mediated isothermal amplification is known for its high sensitivity, specificity and tolerance to inhibiting-substances. In this work, we developed a device for performing real-time colorimetric LAMP combining the accuracy of lab-based quantitative analysis with the simplicity of point-of-care testing. The device innovation lies on the use of a plastic tube anchored vertically on a hot surface while the side walls are exposed to a mini camera able to take snapshots of the colour change in real time during LAMP amplification. Competitive features are the rapid analysis (< 30 min), quantification over 9 log-units, crude sample-compatibility (saliva, tissue, swabs), low detection limit (< 5 copies/reaction), smartphone-operation, fast prototyping (3D-printing) and ability to select the dye of interest (Phenol red, HNB). The device's clinical utility is demonstrated in cancer mutations-analysis during the detection of 0.01% of BRAF-V600E-to-wild-type molecules from tissue samples and COVID-19 testing with 97% (Ct < 36.8) and 98% (Ct < 30) sensitivity when using extracted RNA and nasopharyngeal-swabs, respectively. The device high technology-readiness-level makes it a suitable platform for performing any colorimetric LAMP assay; moreover, its simple and inexpensive fabrication holds promise for fast deployment and application in global diagnostics.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/methods , COVID-19/diagnosis , COVID-19/virology , COVID-19 Nucleic Acid Testing/instrumentation , Colorimetry , Humans , Limit of Detection , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques , Nasopharynx/virology , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Neoplasms/genetics , Neoplasms/pathology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques , Point-of-Care Testing , Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf/genetics , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/metabolism , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity , Smartphone
19.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 3706, 2022 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260654

ABSTRACT

Scaling up SARS-CoV-2 testing and tracing continues to be plagued with the limitation of the sample collection method, which requires trained healthcare workers to perform and causes discomfort to the patients. In response, we assessed the performance and user preference of gargle specimens for qRT-PCR-based detection of SARS-CoV-2 in Indonesia. Inpatients who had recently been diagnosed with COVID-19 and outpatients who were about to perform qRT-PCR testing were asked to provide nasopharyngeal and oropharyngeal (NPOP) swabs and self-collected gargle specimens. We demonstrated that self-collected gargle specimens can be an alternative specimen to detect SARS-CoV-2 and the viral RNA remained stable for 31 days at room temperature storage. The developed method was validated for use on multiple RNA extraction kits and commercially available COVID-19 RT-PCR kits. Our developed method achieved a sensitivity of 91.38% when compared to paired NPOP swab specimens (Ct < 35), with 97.10% of patients preferring the self-collected gargle method.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Saliva/virology , Specimen Handling/methods , COVID-19/virology , Humans , Mouthwashes/chemistry , Nasopharynx/virology , Oropharynx/virology , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/metabolism , Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Sci Rep ; 12(1): 4132, 2022 03 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35260715

ABSTRACT

This paper presents a deep learning-driven portable, accurate, low-cost, and easy-to-use device to perform Reverse-Transcription Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (RT-LAMP) to facilitate rapid detection of COVID-19. The 3D-printed device-powered using only a 5 Volt AC-DC adapter-can perform 16 simultaneous RT-LAMP reactions and can be used multiple times. Moreover, the experimental protocol is devised to obviate the need for separate, expensive equipment for RNA extraction in addition to eliminating sample evaporation. The entire process from sample preparation to the qualitative assessment of the LAMP amplification takes only 45 min (10 min for pre-heating and 35 min for RT-LAMP reactions). The completion of the amplification reaction yields a fuchsia color for the negative samples and either a yellow or orange color for the positive samples, based on a pH indicator dye. The device is coupled with a novel deep learning system that automatically analyzes the amplification results and pays attention to the pH indicator dye to screen the COVID-19 subjects. The proposed device has been rigorously tested on 250 RT-LAMP clinical samples, where it achieved an overall specificity and sensitivity of 0.9666 and 0.9722, respectively with a recall of 0.9892 for Ct < 30. Also, the proposed system can be widely used as an accurate, sensitive, rapid, and portable tool to detect COVID-19 in settings where access to a lab is difficult, or the results are urgently required.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/diagnosis , Deep Learning , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/methods , SARS-CoV-2/genetics , Area Under Curve , COVID-19 Testing , Coloring Agents/chemistry , Humans , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/instrumentation , Nasopharynx/virology , Nucleic Acid Amplification Techniques/instrumentation , Point-of-Care Systems , Printing, Three-Dimensional , RNA, Viral/analysis , RNA, Viral/metabolism , ROC Curve , SARS-CoV-2/isolation & purification , Sensitivity and Specificity
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...