ABSTRACT
AIM: In New Zealand, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second highest cause of cancer death. We sought to characterise a unique population, the individuals who attempt to engage one or multiple times with screening yet fail to ever obtain successful screening. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional descriptive analysis on data from the New Zealand National Bowel Screening Programme 2012 to 2022. RESULTS: Over 7,000 individuals (1.26% of all participants) have attempted but failed to be successfully screened in the national bowel screening programme. Males compared with females (OR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06-1.17), Asian (OR 1.65, 95% CI 1.55-1.77), Maori (OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.92-2.24) or Pacific peoples (OR 2.30, 95% CI 2.09-2.52) compared with Europeans had greater odds to attempt but fail to be screened. Maori New Zealand Index of Deprivation (NZDep) quintile five (most deprived) had 4.12 (95% CI 3.64-4.67, plt;0.0001) the odds to attempt but fail to be screened compared with European deprivation quintile one participants (least deprived). CONCLUSIONS: There are important variations in the failure to successfully receive CRC screening by gender, age, ethnicity, deprivation level and screening year. We suggest drop-off location checking services for all participants are required.
Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Early Detection of Cancer , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Humans , New Zealand/epidemiology , Male , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Colorectal Neoplasms/diagnosis , Colorectal Neoplasms/ethnology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Early Detection of Cancer/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/ethnology , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Maori PeopleABSTRACT
Little is known about the impacts of living in diaspora from the Hawaiian Islands on Native Hawaiian health. To address this, the authors conducted an exploratory analysis using cross-sectional data from the 2021 Native American COVID-19 Alliance Needs Assessment. A total of 1418 participants identified as Native Hawaiian (alone or in any combination), of which 1222 reported residency in the continental US and 196 in Hawai'i. Residency status in the continental US vs Hawai'i was evaluated as a predictor of survey outcomes using likelihood ratio tests on linear and logistic regression models for linear and binary outcomes, respectively. Results showed that NH residency in the continental US was significantly associated with increased odds of reporting fair or poor self-rated health; increased odds for screening positive for anxiety, depression, and suicidality; and increased odds of health insurance loss (P's < .05). Residency in the continent was also associated with lower odds of reporting a diagnosed chronic health condition (P < .05). Residency in the continental US had no observed effect on the odds that participants engaged cultural activities or cultural coping strategies. These results support the role of place of residency as an important Native Hawaiian health predictor during and beyond the COVID-19 pandemic.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/ethnology , Hawaii/epidemiology , Female , Male , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , SARS-CoV-2 , Aged , Pandemics , Health StatusABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Dietary acculturation is the process by which diet and dietary practises from the environment of origin are retained or changed and/or those prevalent in a new environment are adopted. Despite rapid population growth the U.S., knowledge gaps exist on characterising dietary acculturation among Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander communities (AANHPI). This study characterise dietary patterns in a sample representative of AANHPI on key demographic characteristics. METHODS: Data were from a 2013-2014 population-based case-control study in the San Francisco Bay Area, U.S. Survey items were adapted from dietary acculturation scales developed for AANHPI populations. Validated measures assessed social capital, social standing, discrimination and immigration experiences. A principal components factor analysis was conducted to characterise dietary patterns of acculturation. RESULTS: Three dietary patterns were identified: "Asian," "Western," and a distinct "Multicultural" factor. Respondents reporting a high-Asian diet tended to also report smaller social networks, higher levels of stress, and, among those born outside of the U.S., an educational standing that was better before immigration. Respondents reporting a high-Western diet tended to also report the highest level of discrimination. Those reporting a high-Multicultural diet tended to report higher neighbourhood collective efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: The finding of a distinct "Multicultural" factor beyond the typical "Asian" and "Western" factors may reflect the multidirectional relationships between culture, diet, and dietary behavior, in which origin and destination cultures interact in complex ways and where foods from multiple ethnicities intermix.
Subject(s)
Acculturation , Asian , Diet , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Humans , San Francisco , Female , Adult , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Asian/psychology , Middle Aged , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Diet/ethnology , Diet/statistics & numerical data , Case-Control Studies , Cultural Diversity , Young Adult , Aged , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Palliative care plays essential roles in cancer care. However, differences in receipt among individuals identifying as Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Other Pacific Islanders (AA&NHPI) with cancer are not well-characterized, especially when these diverse groups are disaggregated. We characterized disparities in receipt of palliative care among AA&NHPI patients with AJCC Stage IV prostate, breast, or lung cancer. METHODS: We performed multivariable logistic regressions were performed in this retrospective cohort analysis, using deidentified data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB) of patients diagnosed with AJCC analytic group stage IV breast, lung, or prostate cancer (2004-2018) who were White or of Asian Indian/Pakistani, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Hmong, Japanese, Kampuchean, Korean, Laotian, Other Pacific Islander, Thai, or Vietnamese descent. We conducted multivariable logistic regression analyses in a retrospective cohort study using deidentified data from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). The study included patients diagnosed with AJCC analytic group Stage IV breast, lung, or prostate cancer between 2004 and 2018, who were White or identified as Asian Indian/Pakistani, Chinese, Filipino, Hawaiian, Hmong, Japanese, Kampuchean, Korean, Laotian, Other Pacific Islander, Thai, or Vietnamese descent. Adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals of receiving palliative care were measured when comparing White vs. AA&NHPI patients as one cohort and White vs. disaggregated AA&NHPI patients, adjusting for clinical, socioeconomic, and demographic covariates. RESULTS: Among 775,289 individuals diagnosed with cancer (median age: 68 years), no significant differences in palliative care receipt were observed between White patients and aggregated AA&NHPI patients among patients with prostate, breast, or lung cancer. However, disaggregated analyses revealed reduced palliative care receipt for breast cancer patients of Asian Indian/Pakistani descent (AOR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.60-0.94, P = 0.011) and for lung cancer patients of Chinese, Vietnamese, Thai, and Asian Indian/Pakistani descent compared to White patients (Chinese AOR 0.88, [0.81-0.94], P = 0.001; Vietnamese AOR 0.89, [0.80 to 0.99], P = 0.032; Thai AOR 0.64, [0.44-0.92], P = 0.016; Asian Indian/Pakistani AOR 0.83, [0.74-0.93], P = 0.001). Palliative care was greater for patients of Japanese and Hawaiian descent with prostate cancer (Japanese AOR 1.92, [1.32-2.75], P = 0.001; Hawaiian AOR 2.09, [1.20-3.66], P = 0.009), breast cancer (Japanese AOR 1.72, [1.21-2.43], P = 0.001; Hawaiian AOR 1.70, [1.08-2.67], P = 0.021), and lung cancer (Japanese AOR 1.92, [1.70-2.17], P < 0.001; Hawaiian AOR 2.95, [2.5-3.5], P < 0.001), as well as patients of Other Pacific Islander descent with lung cancer (AOR 1.62, [1.34-1.96], P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Our findings demonstrate disparities in receipt of palliative care upon disaggregation of diverse AA&NHPI groups, the need for disaggregated research and targeted interventions that address the unique cultural, socioeconomic, and healthcare system barriers to palliative care receipt.
Subject(s)
Asian , Healthcare Disparities , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Palliative Care , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/therapy , Breast Neoplasms/pathology , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Cohort Studies , Healthcare Disparities/ethnology , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Logistic Models , Lung Neoplasms/therapy , Lung Neoplasms/ethnology , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Neoplasm Metastasis , Neoplasms/therapy , Neoplasms/ethnology , Neoplasms/pathology , Palliative Care/statistics & numerical data , Prostatic Neoplasms/therapy , Prostatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Prostatic Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This Aotearoa New Zealand-based study addresses a gap in literature focusing on individual experiences of racism among adolescents and young adults and its links to health. METHODS: This cross-sectional study uses data from multiple instances of the New Zealand Health Survey (2002/03, 2006/07, 2011/12, 2016/17) and General Social Survey (2008-2016) restricted to participants aged 15-24 years. Prevalence of reported experiences of racism are estimated. Meta-analytic techniques to pool data and multiple regression analyses are used to examine associations between experiences of racism and outcomes measures (mental and physical health, general health and well-being, life satisfaction, inability to access health care, and identity). The study used an ethical co-design process between university researchers and a rangatahi Maori (Maori young people) partnership group. RESULTS: Racism was higher among Maori, Pacific, and Asian young people compared to European young people. Racism was associated with all negative health and well-being measures examined for young people, including negative mental and physical health measures (12-Item Short Form Survey, Kessler Psychological Distress Scale), lower self-rated health, negative life satisfaction, higher unmet need for primary care, and identity measures (feelings of not belonging in New Zealand, less able to express their identity). DISCUSSION: The results of this study are concerning. Non-European young people disproportionately bear the burden of racism in Aotearoa New Zealand with a potentially substantial impact on their health and well-being. This is a breach of Indigenous (for Maori) and other international human rights and should be motivation to act to eliminate racism in all its forms.
Subject(s)
Racism , Humans , New Zealand , Adolescent , Racism/psychology , Male , Young Adult , Female , Cross-Sectional Studies , Health Status , Health Surveys , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health , Health Services AccessibilityABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To estimate notification rates for infectious syphilis in women of reproductive age and congenital syphilis in Australia. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study; analysis of national infectious syphilis and enhanced congenital syphilis surveillance data. SETTING, PARTICIPANTS: Women aged 15-44 years diagnosed with infectious syphilis, and babies with congenital syphilis, Australia, 2011-2021. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Numbers and rates of infectious syphilis notifications, by Indigenous status and age group; numbers and rates of congenital syphilis, by Indigenous status of the infant; antenatal care history for mothers of infants born with congenital syphilis. RESULTS: During 2011-2021, 5011 cases of infectious syphilis in women aged 15-44 years were notified. The notification rate for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women rose from 56 (95% confidence interval [CI], 45-65) cases per 100 000 in 2011 to 227 (95% CI, 206-248) cases per 100 000 population in 2021; for non-Indigenous women, it rose from 1.1 (95% CI, 0.8-1.4) to 9.2 (95% CI, 8.4-10.1) cases per 100 000 population. The notification rate was higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women than for non-Indigenous women (incidence rate ratio [IRR], 23.1; 95% CI, 19.7-27.1), lower for 15-24- (IRR, 0.7; 95% CI, 0.6-0.9) and 35-44-year-old women (IRR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.5-0.7) than for 25-34-year-old women, and higher in remote regions than in major cities (IRR, 2.7; 95% CI, 2.2-3.8). During 2011-2021, 74 cases of congenital syphilis were notified, the annual number increasing from six in 2011 to a peak of 17 in 2020; the rate was consistently higher among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander infants than among non-Indigenous infants (2021: 38.3 v 2.1 per 100 000 live births). The mothers of 32 infants with congenital syphilis (43%) had not received antenatal care. CONCLUSIONS: The number of infectious syphilis notifications for women of reproductive age increased in Australia during 2011-2021, as did the number of cases of congenital syphilis. To avert congenital syphilis, antenatal screening of pregnant women, followed by prompt treatment for infectious syphilis when diagnosed, needs to be improved.
Subject(s)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious , Syphilis, Congenital , Syphilis , Humans , Female , Retrospective Studies , Syphilis, Congenital/epidemiology , Syphilis, Congenital/prevention & control , Australia/epidemiology , Adult , Adolescent , Disease Notification/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , Young Adult , Syphilis/epidemiology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/epidemiology , Infant, Newborn , Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a challenging malignancy with known disparities in outcomes across ethnicities. Studies specifically investigating PDAC in Asian populations are sparse, overlooking the rich diversity within this group. This research seeks to fill that gap by examining survival differences across the broad spectrum of Asian ethnicities, acknowledging the complexity and varied experiences within these communities. Utilizing the National Cancer Database from 2004 to 2019, we categorized patients into East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian, and Pacific Islander groups. Non-Asians or Pacific Islanders were excluded. Overall survival was analyzed using a Cox hazards model. The study consisted of 13,254 patients. Most patients were East Asian (59.4%, n = 7,866). Southeast Asians exhibited the poorest survival in unadjusted analysis (HR, 1.32; 95% confidence interval, 1.23-1.42; P < 0.001) compared with South Asians who exhibited the best survival. Multivariable analysis revealed significantly worse survival for East Asians and Pacific Islanders relative to South Asians, whereas Southeast Asians' results were not significantly different. Asian subgroup differences notably affect PDAC outcomes. Research on genetic and cultural aspects, especially in Southeast Asians, and tackling health disparities are crucial for enhancing survival in this diverse disease. SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlights the significant survival disparities among Asian subgroups with pancreatic cancer, utilizing a large national database. By differentiating among East Asian, Southeast Asian, South Asian, and Pacific Islander groups, it underscores the need for tailored research and healthcare approaches. Addressing these differences is essential for developing culturally sensitive interventions and potentially improving outcomes in a disease that uniquely affects these diverse populations.
Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Humans , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/ethnology , Carcinoma, Pancreatic Ductal/mortality , Female , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Pancreatic Neoplasms/ethnology , Pancreatic Neoplasms/mortality , Male , Aged , Middle Aged , Asian People/statistics & numerical data , Health Status Disparities , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
Limited data describe the epidemiology and risk factors of acral lentiginous melanoma (ALM). In this retrospective analysis, we examined trends in incidence and mortality of ALM among racial and ethnic minoritized populations. We queried 22 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries for cases of ALM among Hispanics, non-Hispanic Asians or Pacific Islanders (NHAPIs), non-Hispanic Blacks (NHBs), and non-Hispanic Whites (NHWs) from 2000 through 2020. Age-adjusted incidence and annual percentage changes (APCs) were estimated. Kaplan-Meier curves were stratified by race and ethnicity and compared with log-rank tests. Cox proportional hazard regression models were adjusted for age, sex, race, ethnicity, income, urban-rural residence, stage, and treatment. Of 4188 total cases of ALM with complete data, our study cohort was comprised of 792 (18.9%) Hispanics, 274 (6.5%) NHAPIs, 336 (8.0%) NHBs, and 2786 (66.5%) NHWs. The age-adjusted incidence of ALM increased by 2.48% (P < 0.0001) annually from 2000 to 2020, which was driven by rising rates among Hispanics (APC 2.34%, P = 0.001) and NHWs (APC 2.69%, P < 0.0001). Incidence remained stable among NHBs (APC 1.15%, P = 0.1) and NHAPIs (APC 1.12%, P = 0.4). From 2000 through 2020, 765 (18.3%) patients died from ALM. Compared to NHWs, Hispanics, NHAPIs, and NHBs had significantly increased ALM-specific mortality (all P < 0.0001). Unadjusted and adjusted cause-specific mortality modeling revealed significantly elevated risk of ALM-specific mortality among Hispanics (hazard ratio [HR] 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-1.75; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.14-1.66), NHAPIs (HR 1.80, 95% CI 1.41-2.32; aHR 1.58, 95% CI 1.23-2.04), and NHBs (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.59-2.47; aHR 2.19, 95% CI 1.74-2.76) (all P < 0.001). Our study finds rising incidence of ALM among Hispanics and NHWs along with elevated risk of ALM-specific mortality among racial and ethnic minoritized populations. Future strategies to mitigate health inequities in ALM are warranted.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , SEER Program , Skin Neoplasms , Humans , Incidence , Male , Female , SEER Program/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Skin Neoplasms/mortality , Skin Neoplasms/ethnology , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Adult , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/ethnology , Melanoma/epidemiology , Risk Factors , Hispanic or Latino/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Young Adult , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Aged, 80 and overABSTRACT
Objectives: The Historical Loss Scale (HLS) and Historical Loss Associated Symptoms Scale (HLASS) are standardized measures that have been accepted and previously validated among North American Indigenous communities and allow researchers to measure the impact of Historical Loss. Evidence of the psychometric properties of this instrument have not been assessed for Native Hawaiians, the Indigenous peoples of Hawai'i. The purpose of this study is to investigate the psychometric properties of the adapted HLS (aHLS) and HLASS for adults from multiple Hawaiian Homestead Communities throughout Hawai'i. Methods: Data are based on cross-sectional surveys administered between 2014 and 2020. The final sample included 491 Native Hawaiian adults who were predominantly female (67.3%) and between the ages of 18-90 years, who were part of the larger study entitled the Hawaiian Homestead Health Survey. Factor analyses were conducted to determine the final model structures of each scale. Reliability and correlation matrices of items are also reported. Results: The final factor structure of the aHLS model suggested 3 factors: (1) General loss of culture or cultural loss, (2) Intergenerational loss, and (3) Distrust and destruction of traditional foods. The final HLASS model also suggested 3 factors: (1) Depression and Anger, (2) Shame and Anxiety, and (3) Re-experiencing, fear, and avoidance. Conclusion: These findings have implications for future research, practice, and education that explores the role of Historical Loss and associated symptoms in Native Hawaiians and Indigenous communities at large. In particular, measuring historical loss and associated symptoms in Hawaiian Homestead communities paves the way for quantitative assessments of historical trauma and healing in these communities.
Subject(s)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Psychometrics , Humans , Female , Adult , Hawaii/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Aged , Adolescent , Cross-Sectional Studies , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Reproducibility of Results , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Factor Analysis, StatisticalABSTRACT
Importance: Variation in DNA methylation at specific loci estimates biological age, which is associated with morbidity, mortality, and social experiences. Aging estimates known as epigenetic clocks, including the Dunedin Pace of Aging Calculated From the Epigenome (DunedinPACE), were trained on data predominately from individuals of European ancestry; however, limited research has explored DunedinPACE in underrepresented populations experiencing health disparities. Objective: To investigate associations of neighborhood and individual sociobehavioral factors with biological aging in a racially and ethnically diverse population. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study, part of the Multiethnic Cohort study conducted from May 1993 to September 1996 to examine racial and ethnic disparities in chronic diseases, integrated biospecimen and self-reported data collected between April 2004 and November 2005 from healthy Hawaii residents aged 45 to 76 years. These participants self-identified as of Japanese American, Native Hawaiian, or White racial and ethnic background. Data were analyzed from January 2022 to May 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: DNA methylation data were generated from monocytes enriched from cryopreserved lymphocytes and used to derive DunedinPACE scores from November 2017 to June 2021. Neighborhood social economic status (NSES) was estimated from 1990 US Census Bureau data to include factors such as educational level, occupation, and income. Individual-level factors analyzed included educational level, body mass index (BMI), physical activity (PA), and diet quality measured by the Healthy Eating Index (HEI). Linear regression analysis of DunedinPACE scores was used to examine their associations with NSES and sociobehavioral variables. Results: A total of 376 participants were included (113 [30.1%] Japanese American, 144 [38.3%] Native Hawaiian, and 119 [31.6%] White; 189 [50.3%] were female). Mean (SE) age was 57.81 (0.38) years. Overall, mean (SE) DunedinPACE scores were significantly higher among females than among males (1.28 [0.01] vs 1.25 [0.01]; P = .005); correlated negatively with NSES (R = -0.09; P = .08), HEI (R = -0.11; P = .03), and educational attainment (R = -0.15; P = .003) and positively with BMI (R = 0.31; P < .001); and varied by race and ethnicity. Native Hawaiian participants exhibited a higher mean (SE) DunedinPACE score (1.31 [0.01]) compared with Japanese American (1.25 [0.01]; P < .001) or White (1.22 [0.01]; P < .001) participants. Controlling for age, sex, HEI, BMI, and NSES, linear regression analyses revealed a negative association between educational level and DunedinPACE score among Japanese American (ß, -0.005 [95% CI, -0.013 to 0.002]; P = .03) and Native Hawaiian (ß, -0.003 [95% CI, -0.011 to 0.005]; P = .08) participants, yet this association was positive among White participants (ß, 0.007; 95% CI, -0.001 to 0.015; P = .09). Moderate to vigorous PA was associated with lower DunedinPACE scores only among Native Hawaiian participants (ß, -0.006; 95% CI, -0.011 to -0.001; P = .005), independent of NSES. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study of a racially and ethnically diverse sample of 376 adults, low NSES was associated with a higher rate of biological aging measured by DunedinPACE score, yet individual-level factors such as educational level and physical activity affected this association, which varied by race and ethnicity. These findings support sociobehavioral interventions in addressing health inequities.
Subject(s)
DNA Methylation , Life Style , Social Class , Humans , Male , Female , DNA Methylation/genetics , Middle Aged , Aged , Hawaii , Life Style/ethnology , Aging/genetics , Cohort Studies , Epigenomics , White People/statistics & numerical data , White People/genetics , Asian/genetics , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/statistics & numerical data , Ethnicity/genetics , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/genetics , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical dataSubject(s)
Asian , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Suicide , Humans , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/ethnology , Female , Male , Young Adult , Child , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
This cross-sectional study examines trends in suicide rates among Asian American or Pacific Islander youth by sex from 1999 to 2021.
Subject(s)
Asian , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Suicide , Humans , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Asian/psychology , Adolescent , Suicide/statistics & numerical data , Suicide/ethnology , Suicide/trends , United States/epidemiology , Female , Male , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Young Adult , Child , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The risk of diabetes among Asian, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (ANHPI) women after breast cancer is unclear. This study estimated the risk of incident type II diabetes in older ANHPI and older non-Hispanic White (NHW) women with breast cancer from the US National Cancer Institute's Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Medicare linked claims. METHODS: A matched cohort of 7122 older ANHPI and 21â365 older NHW women with breast cancer were identified from SEER-Medicare between 2000 and 2017. To assess the risk of incident type II diabetes after breast cancer, hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were estimated using the Cox proportional-hazards regression model. RESULTS: During the mean 8 years of follow-up, 9.3% of older women with breast cancer developed incident type II diabetes. In comparison with older NHW women, older ANHPI women without a known history of diabetes had an elevated risk of diabetes after breast cancer, with strong associations observed for Pacific Islander (HR = 3.09, 95% CI = 1.43 to 6.67), Vietnamese (HR = 2.12, 95% CI = 1.33 to 2.36), and Filipino (HR = 2.02, 95% CI = 1.57 to 2.59) women with breast cancer, adjusting for potential confounders. Among ANHPI women with breast cancer, more baseline comorbidities and obesity were risk factors for developing incident type II diabetes. CONCLUSION: ANHPI women diagnosed with breast cancer had an elevated risk of type II diabetes compared with older NHW women with breast cancer. Routine monitoring and management of diabetes are warranted in older ANHPI women with breast cancer.
Subject(s)
Asian , Breast Neoplasms , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , SEER Program , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Breast Neoplasms/ethnology , Breast Neoplasms/epidemiology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/ethnology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/epidemiology , Incidence , Medicare , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Obesity/ethnology , Obesity/epidemiology , Obesity/complications , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Factors , United States/epidemiology , White/statistics & numerical dataABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Reports of escalated discrimination experiences among Asian American and Native Hawaiian Pacific Islanders (AANHPI) continue. METHODS: Using the original and follow-up surveys of the COVID-19 Effects on the Mental and Physical Health of AAPI (Asian American and Pacific Islanders) Survey Study (COMPASS I and COMPASS II) (n = 3177), we examined changes over approximately a 1-year period in discrimination experiences attributable to being AAPI and factors associated with worse mental health outcomes. RESULTS: Experiences of discrimination remained high in COMPASS II with 60.6% (of participants (compared to 60.2% among the same people in COMPASS I) reporting one or more discrimination experiences, and 28.6% reporting worse mental health outcomes. Experiences of discrimination were associated with modest but significant increase in the odds of worse mental health: adjusted OR 1.02 (95% CI 1.01-1.04). Being younger, being of Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander or Hmong descent (relative to Asian Indian), and having spent 50% or less of their lifetime in the US (vs. US born), were significantly associated with worse mental health. CONCLUSIONS: The fall-out from the pandemic continues to adversely impact AANHPI communities. These findings may help influence policy initiatives to mitigate its effects and support interventions designed to improve mental health outcomes.
Subject(s)
Asian , COVID-19 , Mental Health , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Humans , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/ethnology , Asian/psychology , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Racism/psychology , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Pandemics , Adolescent , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
This study examined the e-cigarette and vaping resistance strategies used by Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander (NHPI) youths in rural Hawai'i. Focus groups (N = 17) were conducted in eight geographically dispersed elementary, middle/intermediate, and multilevel schools in low-income communities on Hawai'i Island. Sixty-nine youths (67% NHPI, Mage = 12.5 years) participated in this study. The resistance strategies discussed across the greatest number of groups were "refuse" (saying no), "explain" (providing reasons for vaping refusal), "avoid" (avoiding people or places where e-cigarettes were used), and "leave" (walking away from a situation where e-cigarettes were being used). Participants described the challenges in using these strategies within contexts characterized by widespread peer and family vaping and strong social demands to use e-cigarettes. The findings suggest the need for multi-level interventions based on youths' resistance strategies to meaningfully reduce youth vaping use in rural and/or NHPI communities.
Subject(s)
Focus Groups , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Vaping , Humans , Adolescent , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/psychology , Vaping/ethnology , Hawaii , Male , Female , Child , Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems/statistics & numerical data , Rural Population/statistics & numerical data , Pacific Island PeopleABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To investigate disparities in the work-sleep relationship between Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islanders (NHPIs) and non-Hispanic (NH)-White populations. METHODS: Using data from a nationally representative sample of U.S. adults (n = 20,828) in the 2014 National Health Interview Survey, we estimated prevalence of short sleep duration (<7 hours) among NHPIs (10%) and NH-Whites for each of 7 employment industry categories and 3 occupational classes. Mean age was 41 ± 0.5years for NHPIs and 49 ± 0.2years for NH-Whites. Women comprised 52% of both groups. RESULTS: NHPIs were more likely than NH-Whites to report short sleep duration across all industry of employment categories (except for food and accommodation services) and occupational classes. The disparity was widest among NHPI and NH-White workers in the "professional/management" industry category, with NHPIs having higher prevalence of very short (<6 hours; 20% vs. 7%) and short sleep (30% vs. 22%) durations and lower prevalence of recommended sleep duration (45% vs. 68%) and waking up feeling rested (53% vs. 67%). Among the occupational classes, the NHPI-White disparity was widest among participants who held support service occupations. Although professionals had the lowest and laborers had the highest prevalence of short sleep among the three occupational classes in both NHPI and NH-White groups, short sleep duration prevalence was higher among NHPI professionals (35%) than NH-White laborers (33%). NH-White workers across industry and occupational classes had higher sleep medication use prevalence compared to NHPI workers. CONCLUSIONS: The work environment via occupation type may contribute to racial/ethnic disparities in short sleep. Further investigations are warranted.
Subject(s)
Employment , Health Status Disparities , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , White People , Humans , Female , Male , Adult , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , United States/epidemiology , Employment/statistics & numerical data , White People/statistics & numerical data , White People/psychology , Time Factors , Occupations/statistics & numerical data , Industry/statistics & numerical data , Sleep Quality , Health Surveys , Sleep , Pacific Island People , Sleep DurationSubject(s)
Asian , Melanoma , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander , Skin Neoplasms , Adult , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Asian/statistics & numerical data , Melanoma/epidemiology , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma, Cutaneous Malignant , Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander/statistics & numerical data , Sex Factors , Skin Neoplasms/epidemiology , Skin Neoplasms/mortalityABSTRACT
The mental health crisis among Native Hawaiian young adults is exacerbated by colonization-related risk factors, yet cultural identity stands as a key protective element. This study explored the link between cultural identity and stress, employing cultural reclamation theory, and surveyed 37 Native Hawaiians aged 18-24 through the Native Hawaiian Young Adult Well-being Survey. Engagement with culture, the significance of Hawaiian identity, and stress were assessed, revealing significant correlations between cultural and demographic factors and stress levels. Participants displayed high cultural engagement and valued their Hawaiian identity, with gender and education levels playing a notable role in stress. These findings highlight the importance of including Native Hawaiian perspectives in mental health research and may guide the development of targeted interventions.