Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 8 de 8
Filter
1.
MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs ; 42(1): 43-49, 2017.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27926599

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were to determine and compare extended use-effectiveness of an online nurse-managed fertility education service program among women (and subgroups of women) seeking to avoid pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a 24-month prospective study of a university-based online Web site with 663 nonbreastfeeding women using an online charting system to avoid pregnancy. Participants tracked their fertility online with either cervical mucus monitoring, electronic hormonal fertility monitoring, or both fertility indicators. Unintended pregnancies were validated by professional nurses. RESULTS: Participants had a mean age of 30.4 years (SD = 6.3) and mean 1.7 children (SD = 2.0). Among the 663 nonbreastfeeding participants there were 2 unintended pregnancies per 100 at 24 cycles of correct use and 15 pregnancies at 24 cycles of typical use. However, the 212 women using the electronic fertility monitor had a typical use unintended pregnancy rate of 6 at 24 cycles of use in comparison with the 118 women using cervical mucus monitoring that had a typical use pregnancy rate of 19 at 24 cycles and with the 333 women using both fertility indicators that had a pregnancy rate of 18 at 24 cycles of use. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of the fertility monitor to estimate fertility among nonbreastfeeding women provides the most secure method of avoiding pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Program Evaluation/standards , Sex Education/methods , Adult , Female , Humans , Internet , Ovulation Detection/methods , Ovulation Detection/standards , Preconception Care/standards , Pregnancy , Program Evaluation/statistics & numerical data , Sex Education/statistics & numerical data
2.
Obstet Gynecol ; 128(1): 58-63, 2016 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27275788

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of fertility web sites and applications (apps) by comparing the predicted fertile window of these modalities to the actual fertile window of a standard 28-day cycle. METHODS: This was a descriptive study. The top resulting free web sites and electronic apps downloadable to a cellular phone that provide calendars for fertility and ovulation prediction were assessed. Cycles were standardized to 28 days in length, 4 days of menses, and the last menstrual period was set to January 1, 2015. The predicted date of ovulation and fertility window generated were compared with an actual estimated date of ovulation on cycle day 15, January 15, and a fertile window consisting of cycle day 10 to cycle day 15, the day of ovulation plus the preceding 5 cycle days, January 10-15. RESULTS: Data from 20 web sites and 33 apps were collected. Of all the web sites and apps used, one web site and three apps predicted the precise fertile window. CONCLUSION: Web sites and electronic apps used by the general public to predict fertile windows are generally inaccurate, although the clinical effect of this inaccuracy is unknown. Although they all include the most fertile cycle day, the range of the fertility window varies widely. Patients who are trying to conceive with the assistance of calendars generated from web sites and electronic apps should be counseled on the inaccuracy of these modalities.


Subject(s)
Cell Phone , Fertile Period , Internet , Mobile Applications/standards , Natural Family Planning Methods , Adult , Data Accuracy , Female , Fertility/physiology , Humans , Natural Family Planning Methods/methods , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Prognosis
3.
Contraception ; 77(3): 147-54, 2008 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18279683

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Many national and institutional family planning policies explicitly include fertility awareness-based methods among the method options that should be made available, but these methods are often not offered for a variety of reasons. After testing the efficacy of the Standard Days Method (SDM), which is a fertility awareness-based method that identifies Days 8-19 of the menstrual cycle as fertile for women with cycles lasting between 26 and 32 days, pilot studies were conducted to introduce it into programs. STUDY DESIGN: Through 14 pilot studies around the world, ministries of health, family planning associations and community development organizations introduced the SDM. Follow-up interviews with users and other data collection methodologies were used to track user characteristics and experiences. Supervision data and simulated clients assessed the effects on service delivery. RESULTS: The SDM appeals to a broad range of women throughout the world. Clients report using abstinence or condoms to manage the fertile days. Both men and women report high levels of satisfaction with the method. The cross-study first-year failure rate of 14.1 pregnancies per 100 woman-years of use is similar to typical-use rates found in the SDM efficacy trial. CONCLUSIONS: The results of the pilot studies offer guidance for scaling up service delivery of the SDM. Condom counseling can help many users manage the fertile window effectively. Because out-of-range cycles can lead to method failure, users must understand the importance of tracking cycle length and be willing to switch to another method when the SDM is contraindicated. Community providers can offer the method; within clinical settings, SDM counseling typically takes no more time than allowed in most program norms. Training providers to address alcohol use and gender-based violence improves SDM method use and contributes to better quality of care.


Subject(s)
Family Planning Services/organization & administration , Natural Family Planning Methods , Adolescent , Adult , Clinical Competence , Contraception Behavior , Counseling , Female , Humans , International Cooperation , Learning , Middle Aged , Natural Family Planning Methods/methods , Natural Family Planning Methods/psychology , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Patient Satisfaction , Pilot Projects , Treatment Failure
4.
Ginekol Pol ; 76(5): 414-9, 2005 May.
Article in Polish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16145863

ABSTRACT

In this review characteristics and efficiency of the natural family planning methods were discussed. Significance of the natural family planning methods in everyday health care practice was presented. Good impact on the relationship of couples and lack of side effects was underlined.


Subject(s)
Contraception Behavior , Family Planning Services/standards , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Contraception Behavior/psychology , Family Planning Services/methods , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle , Natural Family Planning Methods/methods , Ovulation Detection/methods , Patient Acceptance of Health Care , Pregnancy , Sexual Abstinence , Spouses/psychology
5.
J Midwifery Womens Health ; 50(1): 31-8, 2005.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15637512

ABSTRACT

Calendar-based methods are not usually considered effective or useful methods of family planning among health professionals. However, new "high-" and "low"-tech calendar methods have been developed, which are easy to teach, to use, and may be useful in helping couples avoid pregnancy. The low-tech models are based on a fixed-day calendar system. The high-tech models are based on monitoring urinary metabolites of female reproductive hormones. Both systems have high levels of satisfaction. This article describes these new models of family planning and the research on their effectiveness. The author proposes a new algorithm for determining the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle for either achieving or avoiding pregnancy.


Subject(s)
Family Planning Services/standards , Fertility , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Natural Family Planning Methods/methods , Ovulation Detection/methods , Algorithms , Body Temperature/physiology , Cervix Mucus/physiology , Female , Humans , Menstrual Cycle/physiology , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Ovulation Detection/standards , Patient Acceptance of Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Patient Satisfaction/statistics & numerical data , Pregnancy , United States
6.
Fertil Steril ; 82(4): 885-92, 2004 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15482764

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To test the efficacy of the TwoDay Method, a new fertility awareness-based method of family planning that provides women with simple instructions to identify the days each cycle when they are most likely to become pregnant. Users avoid unprotected intercourse on days when cervical secretions are present on that day or on the day before, to prevent pregnancy. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized, multicenter study. SETTING: Five culturally diverse sites in Guatemala, Peru, and the Philippines. PATIENT(S): Four hundred fifty women, aged 18-39 years, wishing to use a fertility awareness-based method to prevent or delay pregnancy. INTERVENTION(S): Study participants were followed for up to 13 cycles of method use. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Life table pregnancy rate. RESULT(S): The first-year pregnancy rate was 3.5 (pregnancies per 100 women/years) with correct use of the method (pregnancies and cycles with no intercourse on identified fertile days), 6.3 with use of a backup method on the fertile days, and 13.7 including all cycles and all pregnancies in the analysis. CONCLUSION(S): The TwoDay Method offers a valuable addition to the services that reproductive health and other programs can offer. Its efficacy compares well with that of other coitus-dependent family-planning methods; it is easy to teach, learn, and use; and it can address the need of women for simple, accurate instructions for identifying their fertile days.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/metabolism , Fertility/physiology , Natural Family Planning Methods/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Prospective Studies , Rural Population , Self-Examination/methods , Self-Examination/standards , Sexual Abstinence , Urban Population
7.
Hum Reprod ; 19(4): 889-92, 2004 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14990542

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Intercourse results in a pregnancy essentially only if it occurs during the 6-day fertile interval ending on the day of ovulation. The strong association between timing of intercourse within this interval and the probability of conception typically is attributed to limited sperm and egg life times. METHODS: A total of 782 women recruited from natural family planning centres in Europe contributed prospective data on 7288 menstrual cycles. Daily records of intercourse, basal body temperature and vaginal discharge of cervical mucus were collected. Probabilities of conception were estimated according to the timing of intercourse relative to ovulation and a 1-4 score of mucus quality. RESULTS: There was a strong increasing trend in the day-specific probabilities of pregnancy with increases in the mucus score. Adjusting for the mucus score, the day-specific probabilities had limited variability across the fertile interval. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in mucus quality across the fertile interval predict the observed pattern in the day-specific probabilities of conception. To maximize the likelihood of conception, intercourse should occur on days with optimal mucus quality, as observed in vaginal discharge, regardless of the exact timing relative to ovulation.


Subject(s)
Cervix Mucus/physiology , Coitus , Fertility/physiology , Fertilization , Natural Family Planning Methods/standards , Adult , Cohort Studies , Europe , Female , Humans , Medical Records , Pregnancy , Probability , Prospective Studies , Time Factors
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...