Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 24
Filter
1.
Lancet Oncol ; 22(3): 381-390, 2021 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33600761

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The role of surgery compared with reirradiation in the primary treatment of patients with resectable, locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) who have previously received radiotherapy is a matter of debate. In this trial, we compared the efficacy and safety outcomes of salvage endoscopic surgery versus intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. METHODS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was done in three hospitals in southern China. We included patients aged 18-70 years with a Karnofsky Performance Status score of at least 70 who were histopathologically diagnosed with undifferentiated or differentiated, non-keratinising, locally recurrent NPC with tumours confined to the nasopharyngeal cavity, the post-naris or nasal septum, the superficial parapharyngeal space, or the base wall of the sphenoid sinus. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either endoscopic nasopharyngectomy (ENPG group) or IMRT (IMRT group). Randomisation was done manually using a computer-generated random number code and patients were stratified by treatment centre. Treatment group assignment was not masked. The primary endpoint was overall survival, compared between the groups at 3 years. Efficacy analyses were done by intention to treat. Safety analysis was done in patients who received treatment according to the treatment they actually received. This trial was prospectively registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR-TRC-11001573, and is currently in follow-up. FINDINGS: Between Sept 30, 2011, and Jan 16, 2017, 200 eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either ENPG (n=100) or IMRT (n=100). At a median follow-up of 56·0 months (IQR 42·0-69·0), 74 patients had died (29 [29%] of 100 patients in the ENPG group and 45 [45%] of 100 patients in the IMRT group). The 3-year overall survival was 85·8% (95% CI 78·9-92·7) in the ENPG group and 68·0% (58·6-77·4) in the IMRT group (hazard ratio 0·47, 95% CI 0·29-0·76; p=0·0015). The most common grade 3 or worse radiation-related late adverse event was pharyngeal mucositis (in five [5%] of 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 26 [26%] of 101 patients who underwent IMRT). Five [5%] of the 99 patients who underwent ENPG and 20 [20%] of the 101 patients who underwent IMRT died due to late toxic effects specific to radiotherapy; attribution to previous radiotherapy or trial radiotherapy is unclear due to the long-term nature of radiation-related toxicity. INTERPRETATION: Endoscopic surgery significantly improved overall survival compared with IMRT in patients with resectable locally recurrent NPC. These results suggest that ENPG could be considered as the standard treatment option for this patient population, although long-term follow-up is needed to further determine the efficacy and toxicity of this strategy. FUNDING: Sun Yat-sen University Clinical Research 5010 Program.


Subject(s)
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/mortality , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated/mortality , Adult , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma/surgery , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/radiotherapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Prognosis , Survival Rate
2.
Surg Innov ; 27(2): 181-186, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31920153

ABSTRACT

Background. Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) was developed as a less aggressive alternative treatment for rectal lesions. The purpose of this study was to report the results of robotic TAMIS for such patients. Methods. Patients eligible for TAMIS were operated on using the da Vinci robotic surgical system and GelPOINT Path Transanal Access Platform. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics, perioperative data, complications, and follow-up of all patients were recorded retrospectively. Results. Between March 2015 and August 2018, 24 patients underwent robotic TAMIS by using the da Vinci Si or Xi. The median operative time was 129.6 minutes, and the estimated blood loss was minimal. The mean length of hospital stay was 4.6 days, with no operative complications and no 30-day mortality. There were no statistically significant differences in clinical results and pathological outcomes between the 2 generations of da Vinci systems. Conclusions. With the use of robotic technology, transanal local excision for rectal lesions can be performed with relative ease and safety and can be potentially decreasing the morbidity associated with more aggressive surgical techniques.


Subject(s)
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Rectum/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal/surgery , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Postoperative Complications , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality
3.
J BUON ; 24(5): 1817-1823, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31786842

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: To compare the short-term efficacy between natural orifice specimen extraction (NOSE) without abdominal incision and conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid colon cancer and upper rectal cancer. METHODS: A total of 86 patients scheduled to undergo laparoscope-assisted radical surgery of sigmoid cancer or upper rectal cancer from January 2015 to September 2017 (T1-3 stages in preoperative imaging evaluation, no distant metastasis, and body mass index <28 kg/m2) were selected and randomly divided into the NOSE group (no abdominal incision, n=43) and conventional laparoscopy group (LA group, n=43). The operation time, amount of intraoperative bleeding, postoperative exhaust time, postoperative diet time, postoperative hospitalization duration, postoperative pain score and perioperative complications were compared between the two groups. The pathological conditions of surgical specimens were recorded. The postoperative recurrence rate of tumor and survival rate of patients were also recorded and compared. RESULTS: The general clinical features were comparable between the two groups, and there were no perioperative deaths. The operation time in NOSE group was slightly longer than that in LA group, without statistically significant difference (p=0.130). In NOSE group, the amount of intraoperative bleeding was significantly smaller than in LA group [(59.31±14.64) mL vs. (75.41±18.16) mL, p<0.001], the postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) score was significantly lower than that in LA group [(4.2±1.6) points vs. (5.9±1.4) points, p<0.001], and the postoperative exhaust time and regular diet time were significantly shorter than those in LA group [(2.1±1.0) d vs. (2.6±1.2) d, p=0.039, (3.8±1.1) d vs. (4.4±1.4) d, p=0.030]. The cosmetic result in NOSE group was better than that in LA group [(8.0±1.5) vs. (6.4±1.1), p<0.001]. Moreover, the comparison results of surgical specimens showed that there were no statistically significant differences in the intestine resection length, proximal and distal resection margins, tumor size, number of lymph nodes dissected and TNM stage of tumor between the two groups (p>0.05). The postoperative tumor recurrence rate had no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.359), and the Log-rank test revealed that the disease-free survival (DFS) rate had no statistically significant difference between the two groups (p=0.280). CONCLUSIONS: NOSE without abdominal incision has a comparable short-term clinical efficacy to conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of sigmoid cancer and upper rectal cancer, but it significantly reduces the amount of intraoperative bleeding and lowers the pain of patients, with rapid postoperative recovery and high safety, so it is worthy of clinical popularization.


Subject(s)
Colectomy , Laparoscopy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Sigmoid Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Colectomy/adverse effects , Colectomy/mortality , Female , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Sigmoid Neoplasms/mortality , Sigmoid Neoplasms/pathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
4.
Laryngoscope ; 129(8): 1844-1855, 2019 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30575965

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To compare long-term oncologic outcomes and adjuvant therapies for patients treated with transoral robotic surgery (TORS), nonrobotic surgery, or transoral laser microsurgery (TLM). STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of the National Cancer Database (2010-2014). METHODS: Patients with clinical tumor (T)1 and T2 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) were classified into those receiving TORS versus nonrobotic surgery versus TLM. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were conducted with chi-square tests; Kaplan-Meier log-rank test; and Cox multivariate, logistic regression, and multinomial regression modeling. RESULTS: We identified 2,224 OPSCC TORS patients; 6,697 nonrobotic surgery patients; and 333 TLM patients. The majority of patients were white males with a mean age of approximately 59 years. No significant difference was noted between the cohorts in tumor stage; however, TORS patients were more likely to have nodal (N)1 to N3 disease than nonrobotic surgery and TLM patients, respectively (69.8% vs. 62.0% vs. 59.7%, P < 0.001). TORS was associated with a lower likelihood of positive margins when compared to nonrobotic surgery, although not TLM (nonrobotic surgery: hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, P < 0.001, TLM: HR 1.13, P = 0.582). TORS was associated with lower likelihood of postsurgical chemoradiotherapy (TLM: HR 2.07, P < 0.001, nonrobotic surgery: 1.65, P < 0.001) but not adjuvant radiotherapy alone (TLM: HR 1.06, P = 0.569, nonrobotic surgery: 0.96, P = 0.655). On multivariate Cox analysis of overall survival, the use of TORS was not associated with increased survival (TLM: HR 1.31, P = 0.233, nonrobotic surgery: HR 1.12, P < 0.303). CONCLUSION: The advantages of TORS for early-stage OPSCC may be a lower likelihood of postsurgical positive margins and subsequent need for adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 129:1844-1855, 2019.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/therapy , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/therapy , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant/mortality , Chi-Square Distribution , Combined Modality Therapy , Databases, Factual , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Neoplasm Staging , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Proportional Hazards Models , Regression Analysis , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Treatment Outcome , United States
5.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 128(4): 300-308, 2019 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30584783

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:: Invasive fungal rhinosinusitis is a rare, life-threatening condition that affects the paranasal sinuses. The standard of care after diagnosis includes surgical debridement and aggressive medical management. Despite treatment, mortality remains unacceptably high. Most data are derived from small cohort experiences, with limited identification of mortality risk factors in the acute setting. The authors used a large national database to better understand clinical factors associated with inpatient mortality for this challenging condition. METHODS:: Using the 2000-2014 National (Nationwide) Inpatient Sample database, the authors identified 979 adult patients with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis code of mucormycosis or aspergillosis and a procedure code of sinus surgery. Multivariate imputation by chained equation was performed to account for missing data, followed by multivariate logistic regression to identify predictors of inpatient mortality. RESULTS:: In total, 979 adult patients were identified, with a median age of 57 years. The inpatient mortality rate was 15.8%. The most prevalent comorbidity was hematologic disorders (42.9%). Mucormycosis versus aspergillosis was associated with increased odds of inpatient mortality (odds ratio, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.00-4.34; P < .001). The odds of inpatient mortality were significantly increased between patients with hematologic disorders and those without (odds ratio, 1.92; 95% confidence interval, 1.08-3.39; P = .024). Diabetes (odds ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.34 - 0.80; P = .003) was associated with the lowest odds of inpatient mortality. CONCLUSIONS:: This represents the first population-based study evaluating the factors associated with inpatient mortality. These findings support prior observations demonstrating that the underlying immune dysfunction and type of fungal infection are important predictors of early mortality.


Subject(s)
Aspergillosis , Invasive Fungal Infections , Mucormycosis , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Rhinitis , Sinusitis , Aspergillosis/mortality , Aspergillosis/surgery , Comorbidity , Databases, Factual/statistics & numerical data , Debridement/methods , Female , Hematologic Diseases/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Invasive Fungal Infections/mortality , Invasive Fungal Infections/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Mortality , Mucormycosis/mortality , Mucormycosis/surgery , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Paranasal Sinuses/microbiology , Paranasal Sinuses/surgery , Rhinitis/microbiology , Rhinitis/mortality , Rhinitis/surgery , Risk Factors , Sinusitis/microbiology , Sinusitis/mortality , Sinusitis/surgery , United States
6.
Head Neck ; 40(4): 747-755, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29327784

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study presents oncologic outcomes after transoral robotic surgery (TORS) ± adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). METHODS: Three hundred fourteen patients undergoing TORS ± adjuvant therapy for oropharyngeal SCC from May 1, 2007, to May 31, 2015, are analyzed. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 3.3 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.8-5.3 years; range 1 day to 9.3 years). Estimated locoregional recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), overall survival (OS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates (95% confidence interval [CI] number still at risk) at 5 years after surgery were 92% (88-95; 92), 90% (86-94; 92), 86% (82-92; 98), and 94% (91-97; 98), respectively. Negative margins were achieved in 98% of cases. The adult comorbidity evaluation (ACE)-27 comorbidity index, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, pathologic N classification, and number of attempts to clear margins were associated with death due to cancer (P = .003, P = .002, P = .030, and P = .002, respectively). CONCLUSION: The need to take ≥2 margins to achieve resection portends an increased risk of locoregional recurrence and death due to disease in oropharyngeal SCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Male , Margins of Excision , Middle Aged , Mouth , Multivariate Analysis , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Survival Analysis
7.
Head Neck ; 40(4): 710-721, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29244238

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The emergence of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) ignited the debate between surgical and nonsurgical strategies on oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) management; a question further complicated by human papillomavirus (HPV). We evaluated the survival by treatment strategy independently in HPV-related and HPV-nonrelated oropharyngeal SCC. METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried for patients with oropharyngeal SCC with known HPV status who underwent primary TORS or primary radiotherapy. The overall survival (OS) was compared by treatment strategy, including propensity matching to control for confounders. RESULTS: Of 1873 patients, 73% were HPV-positive and 30% were treated with TORS. The propensity-matched patients with HPV-positive disease displayed no significant difference in 3-year survival; 95% versus 91% (P = .116) for the TORS versus primary radiotherapy. In the HPV-negative cohort, TORS was associated with superior survival; 84% versus 66% (P = .01). CONCLUSION: The TORS-based approach was associated with superior survival in patients with HPV-negative oropharyngeal SCC; similar difference was not observed in patients with HPV-positive disease.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/virology , Papillomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Registries , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/radiotherapy , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Papillomavirus Infections/mortality , Papillomavirus Infections/surgery , Propensity Score , Proportional Hazards Models , Risk Assessment , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States
8.
An Acad Bras Cienc ; 89(1 Suppl 0): 685-693, 2017 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28562823

ABSTRACT

Transrectal access still has some unsolved issues such as spatial orientation, infection, access and site closure. This study presents a simple technique to perform transcolonic access with survival in a swine model series. A new technique for NOTES perirectal access to perform retroperitoneoscopy, peritoneoscopy, liver and lymphnode biopsies was performed in 6 pigs, using Totally NOTES technique. The specimens were extracted transanally. The flexible endoscope was inserted through a posterior transmural incision and the retrorectal space. Cultures of bacteria were documented for the retroperitoneal space and intra abdominal cavity after 14 days. Rectal site was closed using non-absorbable sutures. There was no bowel cleansing, nor preoperative fasting. The procedures were performed in 6 pigs through transcolonic natural orifice access using available endoscopic flexible instruments. All animals survived 14 days without complications, and cultures were negative. Histopathologic examination of the rectal closure site showed adequate healing of suture line and no micro abscesses. The results of feasibility and safety of experimental Transcolonic NOTES potentially brings new frontiers and future wider applications for minimally invasive surgery. The treatment of colorectal, abdominal and retroperitoneal diseases through a flexible Perirectal NOTES Access (PNA) is a promising new approach.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Animals , Colonoscopy/mortality , Feasibility Studies , Models, Animal , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Survival Rate , Swine
9.
Head Neck ; 39(9): 1779-1787, 2017 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28661556

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic laryngopharyngeal surgery (ELPS) was developed for superficial pharyngeal cancers in Japan. In this study, we present our results of ELPS for superficial pharyngeal cancers. METHODS: From November 2009 to December 2015, 258 patients with superficial pharyngeal cancers underwent ELPS. Results, including survival rates, postoperative complications, and vocal function, are reviewed. RESULTS: The median follow-up period of 258 patients was 31 months. The overall and cause-specific survival rates over 3 years were 85.7% and 100%, respectively. Only 3 patients incurred local recurrences and were successfully salvaged by re-ELPS. Regarding postoperative complications, 4 patients required reoperation because of postoperative bleeding. As for the postoperative quality of life, no patients developed vocal fold paralysis. Every patient was able to consume meals at preoperative levels. CONCLUSION: ELPS is a feasible and minimally invasive treatment for superficial pharyngeal cancers with impressive quality of life results.


Subject(s)
Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngoscopy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Adult , Aged , Biopsy, Needle , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Cohort Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Immunohistochemistry , Japan , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Laryngoscopy/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Pharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
10.
An. acad. bras. ciênc ; 89(1,supl): 685-693, May. 2017. graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-886658

ABSTRACT

ABSTRACT Transrectal access still has some unsolved issues such as spatial orientation, infection, access and site closure. This study presents a simple technique to perform transcolonic access with survival in a swine model series. A new technique for NOTES perirectal access to perform retroperitoneoscopy, peritoneoscopy, liver and lymphnode biopsies was performed in 6 pigs, using Totally NOTES technique. The specimens were extracted transanally. The flexible endoscope was inserted through a posterior transmural incision and the retrorectal space. Cultures of bacteria were documented for the retroperitoneal space and intra abdominal cavity after 14 days. Rectal site was closed using non-absorbable sutures. There was no bowel cleansing, nor preoperative fasting. The procedures were performed in 6 pigs through transcolonic natural orifice access using available endoscopic flexible instruments. All animals survived 14 days without complications, and cultures were negative. Histopathologic examination of the rectal closure site showed adequate healing of suture line and no micro abscesses. The results of feasibility and safety of experimental Transcolonic NOTES potentially brings new frontiers and future wider applications for minimally invasive surgery. The treatment of colorectal, abdominal and retroperitoneal diseases through a flexible Perirectal NOTES Access (PNA) is a promising new approach.


Subject(s)
Animals , Anal Canal/surgery , Colonoscopy/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Swine , Feasibility Studies , Survival Rate , Colonoscopy/mortality , Models, Animal , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality
11.
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 11(3): 227-236, 2017 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28052695

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: There have been considerable advances in the endoscopic treatment of colorectal neoplasia. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection and full thickness resection techniques is changing the way benign disease and early cancers are managed. This article reviews the evidence behind these new techniques and discusses where this field is likely to move in the future. Areas covered: A PubMed literature review of resection techniques for colonic neoplasia was performed. The clinical and cost effectiveness of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is examined. The development of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) and knife assisted resection is described and issues around training reviewed. Efficacy is compared to both EMR and transanal endoscopic microsurgery. The future is considered, including full thickness resection techniques and robotic endoscopy. Expert commentary: The perceived barriers to ESD are falling, and views that such techniques are only possible in Japan are disappearing. The key barriers to uptake will be training, and the development of educational programmes should be seen as a priority. The debate between TEMS and ESD will continue, but ESD is more flexible and cheaper. This will become less significant as the number of endoscopists trained in ESD grows and some TEMS surgeons may shift across towards ESD.


Subject(s)
Colonic Neoplasms/surgery , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/trends , Laparoscopy/trends , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/trends , Robotic Surgical Procedures/trends , Colonic Neoplasms/economics , Colonic Neoplasms/mortality , Colonic Neoplasms/pathology , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Diffusion of Innovation , Early Detection of Cancer , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/economics , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/mortality , Forecasting , Health Care Costs , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/economics , Laparoscopy/mortality , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/economics , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Staging , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , Robotic Surgical Procedures/mortality , Treatment Outcome
12.
Head Neck ; 37(6): 889-95, 2015 Jun.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24623709

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Various therapeutic options exist for treatment of T1a glottic squamous cell cancer (SCC). Radiotherapy (RT) has been favored over surgical excision. This has been challenged by transoral laser microsurgery (TLM) showing low morbidity and good functional results. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was carried out. Patients with untreated T1a glottic SCC were included in the study. Endpoints were locoregional control, overall survival, disease-specific survival, and absolute rate of larynx preservation. RESULTS: Four hundred four patients were included in this study. Five-year Kaplan-Meier estimates were: local control 86.8%, overall survival 87.8%, disease-specific survival 98.0%, recurrence-free survival 76.1%, and larynx preservation 97.3%. The complication rate was 1%; the majority of patients had either normal or mildly dysphonic voices. CONCLUSION: Low complication rates, excellent functional outcome, and high rates of organ preservation favor TLM. In agreement with the literature, TLM should be the treatment of choice for patients presenting with T1a glottic SCC.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Glottis/pathology , Head and Neck Neoplasms/surgery , Laryngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Laser Therapy/methods , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/diagnosis , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Cohort Studies , Databases, Factual , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Glottis/surgery , Head and Neck Neoplasms/diagnosis , Head and Neck Neoplasms/mortality , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Laryngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Laryngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Laser Therapy/mortality , Male , Microsurgery/methods , Microsurgery/mortality , Middle Aged , Mouth , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Organ Sparing Treatments/methods , Prognosis , Retrospective Studies , Salvage Therapy/methods , Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
13.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(33): 11538-45, 2014 Sep 07.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25206260

ABSTRACT

Total mesorectal excision (TME) is the standard treatment for rectal cancer, but complications are frequent and rates of morbidity, mortality and genitourinary alterations are high. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) allows preservation of the anal sphincters and, via its vision system through a rectoscope, allows access to rectal tumors located as far as 20 cm from the anal verge. The capacity of local surgery to cure rectal cancer depends on the risk of lymph node invasion. This means that correct preoperative staging of the rectal tumor is necessary. Currently, local surgery is indicated for rectal adenomas and adenocarcinomas invading the submucosa, but not beyond (T1). Here we describe the standard technique for TEM, the different types of equipment used, and the technical limitations of this approach. TEM to remove rectal adenoma should be performed in the same way as if the lesion were an adenocarcinoma, due to the high percentage of infiltrating adenocarcinomas in these lesions. In spite of the generally good results with T1, some authors have published surprisingly high recurrence rates; this is due to the existence of two types of lesions, tumors with good and poor prognosis, divided according to histological and surgical factors. The standard treatment for rectal adenocarcinoma T2N0M0 is TME without adjuvant therapy. In this type of adenocarcinoma, local surgery obtains the best results when complete pathological response has been achieved with previous chemoradiotherapy. The results with chemoradiotherapy and TEM are encouraging, but the scientific evidence remains limited at present.


Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Adenoma/surgery , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Adenocarcinoma/mortality , Adenocarcinoma/pathology , Adenoma/mortality , Adenoma/pathology , Anal Canal , Chemoradiotherapy, Adjuvant , Humans , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Staging , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
14.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(28): 9556-63, 2014 Jul 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25071352

ABSTRACT

AIM: To describe our experience in treating rectal cancer by transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM), report morbidity and mortality and oncological outcome. METHODS: A total of 425 patients with rectal cancer (120 T1, 185 T2, 120 T3 lesions) were staged by digital rectal examination, rectoscopy, transanal endosonography, magnetic resonance imaging and/or computed tomography. Patients with T1-N0 lesions and favourable histological features underwent TEM immediately. Patients with preoperative stage T2-T3-N0 underwent preoperative high-dose radiotherapy; from 1997 those aged less than 70 years and in good general health also underwent preoperative chemotherapy. Patients with T2-T3-N0 lesions were restaged 30 d after radiotherapy and were then operated on 40-50 d after neoadjuvant therapy. The instrumentation designed by Buess was used for all procedures. RESULTS: There were neither perioperative mortality nor intraoperative complications. Conversion to other surgical procedures was never required. Major complications (urethral lesions, perianal or retroperitoneal phlegmon and rectovaginal fistula) occurred in six (1.4%) patients and minor complications (partial suture line dehiscence, stool incontinence and rectal haemorrhage) in 42 (9.9%). Postoperative pain was minimal. Definitive histological examination of the 425 malignant lesions showed 80 (18.8%) pT0, 153 (36%) pT1, 151 (35.5%) pT2, and 41 (9.6%) pT3 lesions. Eighteen (4.2%) patients (ten pT2 and eight pT3) had a local recurrence and 16 (3.8%) had distant metastasis. Cancer-specific survival rates at the end of follow-up were 100% for pT1 patients (253 mo), 93% for pT2 patients (255 mo) and 89% for pT3 patients (239 mo). CONCLUSION: TEM is a safe and effective procedure to treat rectal cancer in selected patients without evidence of nodal involvement. T2-T3 lesions require preoperative neoadjuvant therapy.


Subject(s)
Microsurgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Rectal Neoplasms/surgery , Aged , Anal Canal , Chemotherapy, Adjuvant , Diagnostic Imaging/methods , Digital Rectal Examination , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Microsurgery/adverse effects , Microsurgery/mortality , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoadjuvant Therapy , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Neoplasm Staging , Predictive Value of Tests , Radiotherapy Dosage , Radiotherapy, Adjuvant , Rectal Neoplasms/mortality , Rectal Neoplasms/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome
15.
Surg Innov ; 21(4): 409-18, 2014 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24253256

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) could reduce procedure-associated morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility of performing a simple model of gastrojejunal anastomosis in a living porcine model exclusively using NOTES. METHODS: It was a prospective experimental animal study concerning pigs weighing between 25 and 30 kg. Endoscopies were performed using a double-channel gastroscope. A preliminary phase allowed for the development of the technique on 3 animals that were immediately euthanized. The experimental phase included the implementation of a gastrojejunal anastomosis in 9 animals. Antibiotic therapy was continued for 7 days with gradual feeding. Surviving animals were euthanized after 3 weeks. Anastomosis permeability in each animal was confirmed by opacification, endoscopy, and histopathological analysis. The main outcome measurements were the feasibility and animal survival at 3 weeks postsurgery. RESULTS: The entire procedure was performed on 9 animals (4 males and 5 females). Anastomosis required 4.7 ± 1.2 stitches (range 4-7). The average total length of the procedure was 143 ± 50.8 minutes (range 87-225 minutes). One bleeding, 2 suture dehiscences, and a poor stomach incision were the immediate complications endoscopically resolved. At 3 weeks, 5 animals had survived. Three animals died as a result of anastomotic leakage confirmed at necropsy and histopathology. In the surviving animals, histology confirmed permeable anastomoses with collagen scar tissue and continuity of the mucosa and mucosa muscle layers. CONCLUSION: Successful gastrojejunal anastomosis by NOTES is technically feasible but is subject to a learning curve.


Subject(s)
Anastomotic Leak/prevention & control , Jejunum/surgery , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Stomach/surgery , Anastomosis, Surgical/methods , Animals , Biopsy, Needle , Disease Models, Animal , Feasibility Studies , Female , Immunohistochemistry , Jejunum/pathology , Male , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Pilot Projects , Reproducibility of Results , Stomach/pathology , Survival Rate , Sus scrofa , Suture Techniques , Swine , Tensile Strength
16.
World J Gastroenterol ; 20(48): 18104-20, 2014 Dec 28.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25561780

ABSTRACT

Single-incision laparoscopic surgery (SILS) and natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) have rapidly gained pace worldwide, potentially replacing conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) as the preferred colorectal surgery technique. Currently available data mainly consist of retrospective series analyzed in four meta-analyses. Despite conflicting results and lack of an objective comparison, SILS appears to offer cosmetic advantages over CLS. However, due to conflicting results and marked heterogeneity, present data fail to show significant differences in terms of operative time, postoperative morbidity profiles, port-site complications rates, oncological appropriateness, duration of hospitalization or cost when comparing SILS with conventional laparoscopy for colorectal procedures. The application of "pure" NOTES in humans remains limited to case reports because of unresolved issues concerning the ideal access site, distant organ reach, spatial orientation and viscera closure. Alternatively, minilaparoscopy-assisted natural orifice surgery techniques are being developed. The transanal "down-to-up" total mesorectum excision has been derived for transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) and represents the most encouraging NOTES-derived technique. Preliminary experiences demonstrate good oncological and functional short-term outcomes. Large-scale randomized controlled trials are now mandatory to confirm the long-term SILS results and validate transanal TEM for the application of NOTES in humans.


Subject(s)
Colonic Diseases/surgery , Colonoscopy/trends , Colorectal Surgery/trends , Laparoscopy/trends , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/trends , Rectal Diseases/surgery , Colonoscopy/adverse effects , Colonoscopy/history , Colonoscopy/mortality , Colorectal Surgery/history , History, 20th Century , History, 21st Century , Humans , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/history , Laparoscopy/mortality , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/adverse effects , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/history , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
17.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 149(6): 885-92, 2013 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24013139

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To investigate surgeon preferences for perioperative management of transoral robotic surgery (TORS) and explore the frequency of postoperative complications. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective survey. SETTING: Multi-institutional. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: An electronic survey was sent to over 300 TORS-trained surgeons in the United States identified by Intuitive Surgical, Inc. Participation was voluntary and solicited by email invitations to participate 3 times over a 1-month period. RESULTS: A total of 2015 procedures were reported by 45 respondent TORS-trained surgeons: 67% academic, 33% nonacademic. A minority of TORS procedures (n = 214, 10.6%) were performed on previously irradiated patients. Neck dissections were performed concurrently (58%) or staged (42%). Fewer than 6% of TORS procedures required tracheotomy or reconstruction. Most surgeons (62%) initiated oral intake on postoperative day 0-1. Of the patients who required readmission, bleeding (n = 62, 3.1%) was the most common cause followed by dehydration (n = 26, 1.3%). Other complications of surgery included tooth injury (n = 29, 1.4%), percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) dependency >6 months (n = 21, 1.0%), temporary hypoglossal nerve injury (n = 18, 0.9%), and lingual nerve injury (n = 11, 0.6%). A total of 6 deaths (0.3%) were reported within 30 days of TORS. All reported deaths were due to postoperative hemorrhage. The complication rate decreased significantly with higher surgeon case volume (>50 cases). CONCLUSIONS: TORS is associated with a low major complication rate, early initiation of oral intake, and a low rate of long-term PEG dependency. Postoperative hemorrhage was the most common cause of hospital readmission and postoperative mortality.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma/surgery , Clinical Competence/standards , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery , Neck Dissection , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Robotics , Carcinoma/complications , Dehydration/etiology , Humans , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Operative Time , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/complications , Patient Readmission , Postoperative Hemorrhage/etiology , Retrospective Studies , Robotics/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome , United States
18.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 139(8): 773-8, 2013 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23949352

ABSTRACT

IMPORTANCE: Surgical salvage may be the only viable treatment option for recurrent tumors of the oropharynx. To our knowledge, there have been no published reports directly comparing the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients with recurrent oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) treated with transoral robotic-assisted surgery (TORS) with those treated with traditional open surgical approaches. OBJECTIVE: To compare the oncologic and functional outcomes of patients with recurrent oropharyngeal SCC treated with TORS with those treated with traditional open surgical approaches. DESIGN: Retrospective multi-institutional case-control study; study dates, March 2003 through October 2011. SETTING: Four tertiary care institutions (University of Alabama at Birmingham; M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas; Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; and Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, Michigan). PARTICIPANTS Sixty-four patients who underwent salvage TORS for recurrent oropharyngeal SCC were matched by TNM stage to 64 patients who underwent open salvage resection. INTERVENTION OR EXPOSURE: Salvage TORS for recurrent SCC of the oropharynx. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: Patient demographics, operative data, functional, and oncologic outcomes were recorded and compared with a similarly TNM-matched patient group that underwent salvage surgical resection by traditional open surgical approaches. RESULTS Patients treated with TORS were found to have a significantly lower incidence of tracheostomy use (n = 14 vs n = 50; P < .001), feeding tube use (n = 23 vs n = 48; P < .001), shorter overall hospital stays (3.8 days vs 8.0 days; P < .001), decreased operative time (111 minutes vs 350 minutes; P < .001), less blood loss (49 mL vs 331 mL; P < .001), and significantly decreased incidence of positive margins (n = 6 vs n = 19; P = .007). The 2-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the TORS group than in the open approach group (74% and 43%, respectively) (P = .01). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This study demonstrates that TORS offers an alternative surgical approach to recurrent tumors of the oropharynx with acceptable oncologic outcomes and better functional outcomes than traditional open surgical approaches. This adds to the growing amount of clinical evidence to support the use of TORS in selected patients with recurrent oropharyngeal SCC as a feasible and oncologically sound method of treatment.


Subject(s)
Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/surgery , Pharyngectomy/methods , Robotics/methods , Salvage Therapy , Adult , Aged , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Case-Control Studies , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Staging , Operative Time , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/mortality , Oropharyngeal Neoplasms/pathology , Pharyngectomy/mortality , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Statistics, Nonparametric , Survival Analysis , Treatment Outcome
19.
Zentralbl Chir ; 138(3): 284-8, 2013 Jun.
Article in German | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23325519

ABSTRACT

Acute appendicitis is still one of the most common abdominal emergencies necessitating operative treatment. For the past century, the conventional management of appendicitis has been open appendectomy. Since the introduction of laparoscopic appendectomy, it has been performed with increased frequency. Clinical trials evaluating outcomes comparing open appendectomy with laparoscopic appendectomy indicate that laparoscopic appendectomy is associated with lower complication rate and lower mortality and is to be considered the procedure of choice for patients with suspected acute appendicitis. Ever since Kalloo's first report on transgastric peritoneoscopy in a porcine model in 2004, this dramatic surgical revolution has prompted many surgeons and endoscopists to study this new technique. This complex technique involves breaching the wall of a hollow organ to gain access into the peritoneum: Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic Surgery (NOTES). In recent years, several NOTES experiments have been carried out in animal models and even on humans, including appendectomy. NOTES may help to reduce surgical pain and shorten recovery time. The concept of NOTES has generated intensive interest in the medical community as well as in the group of patients. Although the novel procedure is still far from being mature and many technical problems have to be overcome and more clinical studies have to be done before its widespread application in human appendectomy, NOTES is a promising procedure for the future.


Subject(s)
Appendectomy/methods , Appendicitis/surgery , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/methods , Appendectomy/mortality , Appendicitis/mortality , Cause of Death , Germany , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/mortality , Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures/mortality , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/mortality , Survival Analysis
20.
Surg Endosc ; 26(4): 926-32, 2012 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22011949

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and usefulness of an ovine model in order to perform natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) approach and laparoscopic nephrectomy for research and training purposes. METHODS: Ten healthy female sheep were used to perform transvaginal NOTES-assisted right laparoscopic nephrectomy using a flexible 12-mm gastroscope through a vaginal access and two additional 5- and 10-mm trocars placed in the abdomen. The renal artery, the renal vein, and the ureter were dissected, and ligation was accomplished by using laparoscopic clips. The right kidney was retrieved transvaginally after enlarging the vaginal trocar incision. All data related with the surgical procedure, perioperative, and postoperative outcomes were recorded. The animals were monitored after surgery for a 30-day period with daily clinical follow-up. RESULTS: We established a useful animal model of transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy, performing the transvaginal approach and the abdomen exploration with no complications in any animals. The renal artery, the renal vein, and the ureter were identified, clipped, and transected combining the 5-mm laparoscopic access and the endoscopic vision in the whole group. Mean operative time was 86 ± 14.49 min, estimated blood loss was less than 20 ml in all cases, and there was no bleeding or laceration of adjacent organs. The animals recovered successfully in all cases postoperatively. After 1 month, exploratory laparotomy did not show alterations in abdominal cavity, and the vaginotomy incision healed completely in every animal. CONCLUSIONS: This experiment shows that transvaginal NOTES-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy in ovine model is feasible and reproducible while offering an innovative possibility to help surgeons with this recent technology in the treatment of renal cancer. Well-managed experimental studies need to be carried out to determine the safety and efficacy of NOTES in the treatment of renal cancer.


Subject(s)
Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/methods , Nephrectomy/methods , Animals , Blood Loss, Surgical , Dissection/methods , Feasibility Studies , Female , Length of Stay , Ligation/methods , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/instrumentation , Natural Orifice Endoscopic Surgery/mortality , Nephrectomy/mortality , Sheep, Domestic , Surgical Instruments , Vagina
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL