ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the impact of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19) on the neonatology workforce, focusing on professional and domestic workloads. STUDY DESIGN: We surveyed US neonatologists in December 2020 regarding the impact of COVID-19 on professional and domestic work during the pandemic. We estimated associations between changes in time spent on types of professional and domestic work and demographic variables with multivariable logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: Two-thirds (67.6%) of the 758 participants were women. Higher proportions of women than men were in the younger age group (63.3% vs 29.3%), held no leadership position (61.4% vs 46.3%), had dependents at home (68.8% vs 56.3%), did not have a partner or other adult at home (10.6% vs 3.2%), and had an employed partner (88.1% vs 64.6%) (P < .01 for all). A higher proportion of women than men reported a decrease in time spent on scholarly work (35.0% vs 29.0%; P = .02) and career development (44.2% vs 34.9%; P < .01). A higher proportion of women than men reported spending more time caring for children (74.2% vs 55.8%; P < .01). Reduced time spent on career development was associated with younger age (aOR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.20-4.08) and number of dependents (aOR, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.01-1.45). Women were more likely to report an increase in time spent time doing domestic work (aOR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.07-2.19) and a reduction in time on self-care (aOR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.29-0.81). CONCLUSIONS: COVID-19 significantly impacts the neonatology workforce, disproportionately affecting younger, parent, and women physicians. Targeted interventions are needed to support postpandemic career recovery and advance physician contributions to the field.
Subject(s)
COVID-19/epidemiology , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Workload , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Gender Role , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Physicians, Women/statistics & numerical data , Professional Role , Puerto Rico , SARS-CoV-2 , Sex Factors , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Decisions about treatments for extremely preterm infants (EPIs) born in the 'grey zone' of viability can be ethically complex. This 2020 survey aimed to determine views of UK neonatal staff about thresholds for treatment of EPIs given a recently revised national Framework for Practice from the British Association of Perinatal Medicine. METHODS: The online survey requested participants indicate the lowest gestation at which they would be willing to offer active treatment and the highest gestation at which they would withhold active treatment of an EPI at parental request (their lower and upper thresholds). Relative risks were used to compare respondents' views based on profession and neonatal unit designation. Further questions explored respondents' conceptual understanding of viability. RESULTS: 336 respondents included 167 consultants, 127 registrars/fellows and 42 advanced neonatal nurse practitioners (ANNPs). Respondents reported a median grey zone for neonatal resuscitation between 22+1 and 24+0 weeks' gestation. Registrars/fellows were more likely to select a lower threshold at 22+0 weeks compared with consultants (Relative Risk (RR)=1.37 (95% CI 1.07 to 1.74)) and ANNPs (RR=2.68 (95% CI 1.42 to 5.06)). Those working in neonatal intensive care units compared with other units were also more likely to offer active treatment at 22+0 weeks (RR=1.86 (95% CI 1.18 to 2.94)). Most participants understood a fetus/newborn to be 'viable' if it was possible to survive, regardless of disability, with medical interventions accessible to the treating team. CONCLUSION: Compared with previous studies, we found a shift in the reported lower threshold for resuscitation in the UK, with greater acceptance of active treatment for infants <23 weeks' gestation.
Subject(s)
Fetal Viability/physiology , Gestational Age , Infant Care , Infant, Extremely Premature , Palliative Care , Resuscitation , Attitude of Health Personnel , Clinical Decision-Making , Female , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant Care/ethics , Infant Care/methods , Infant Care/psychology , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Male , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Nurses, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Palliative Care/ethics , Palliative Care/psychology , Resuscitation/ethics , Resuscitation/methods , Resuscitation/psychology , Resuscitation Orders/ethics , Resuscitation Orders/psychology , United Kingdom/epidemiologyABSTRACT
El part domiciliari planificat, assistit per professionals competents I coordinades amb el sistema de salut, ha demostrat ser tan segur com el part hospitalari en gestants de baix risc. El part domiciliari a Catalunya ha esdevingut, els darrers trenta anys, l'única opció per a moltes dones d'evitar l'alt nivell d'intervencionisme en l'atenció al part hospitalari. Aquest treball revisa la bibliografia sobre el part a casa I explora I reflexiona sobre diferents aspectes de la seva situació a Catalunya. L'evidència deixa clar que amb bones guies d'actuació I sistemes de trasllat ben establerts, hi ha poc o cap risc incrementat associat directament al part domiciliari. Tanmateix, per garantir-ne la seguretat cal l'accés a l'atenció mèdica I hospitalària. La col·laboració entre tots els professionals del naixement és essencial per oferir una atenció integral que preservi els interessos de les mares I els nounats perquè el part I el naixement siguin segurs per a unes I altres, saludables a tots els nivells I satisfactoris per a tota la família. A Catalunya, cinc per cada mil dones pareixen a casa. Atès que la dona és lliure de triar on vol parir, que ho faci en les condicions òptimes de seguretat depèn de la col·laboració de tots els professionals implicats en l'atenció a les dones I els nounats, així com de les institucions responsables de la salut. L'Associació de Llevadores del Part a Casa de Catalunya (ALPACC) vol treballar, juntament amb obstetres I neonatòlegs/neonatòlogues, per aconseguir aquesta collaboració interprofessional I institucional
El parto domiciliario planificado, asistido por profesionales compe-tentes y coordinadas con el sistema de salud, ha demostrado ser tan seguro como el parto hospitalario en gestantes de bajo riesgo. El parto domiciliario en Cataluña ha sido, los últimos treinta años, la única opción para muchas mujeres de evitar el alto nivel de intervencionismo en la atención al parto hospitalario. Este trabajo revisa la bibliografía sobre el parto en casa, y explora y reflexiona sobre diferentes aspectos de su situación en Cataluña. La evidencia deja claro que, con buenas guías de actuación y sistemas de traslado bien establecidos, hay poco o ningún riesgo incrementado asociado directamente con el parto domiciliario. Sin embargo, para garantizar su seguridad, es necesario el acceso a la atención médica y hospitalaria. La colaboración entre todos los profesionales del nacimiento es esencial para ofrecer una atención integral que preserve los intereses de las madres y los recién nacidos para que el parto y el nacimiento sean seguros para ambos, saludable a todos los niveles y satisfactorio para toda la familia. En Cataluña, cinco por cada mil mujeres paren en casa. Dado que la mujer es libre de elegir dónde quiere parir, que lo haga en las condiciones óptimas de seguridad depende de la colaboración de todos los profesionales implicados en la atención a las mujeres y los recién nacidos, así como de las instituciones sanitarias. La Associació de Llevadores del Part a Casa de Catalunya (ALPACC) quiere trabajar, conjuntamente con obstetras y neonatólogos/ neonatólogas, para conseguir esta colaboración interprofesional e institucional
Well-planned home birth, assisted by trained professionals and coordinated with the health systems, has demonstrated to be as safe as hospital birth for low-risk pregnancies. Over the last 30 years in Catalonia, home birth has been the only option for women who want to avoid the high level of interventionism that characterizes hospital birth. In this article, we review the literature on home birth, and we examine its status in Catalonia. Available evidence indicates that with good management guides and well-established transportation systems, the incremental risk associated with home birth is minimal. However, in order to ensure safety, ready access to medical and hospital care is critical. The collaboration between all professionals is essential to offer comprehensive care that protects the interests and well-being of the mothers and the newborn, with the goal of creating a safe and healthy birth experience for both and to the satisfaction of the family. In Catalonia, five of every thousand females deliver at home. Given the fact that women can chose where they want to deliver, having the optimum conditions of safety depends on the collaboration of all the healthcare providers dedicated to maternal and child health, as well as the healthcare administration. The Association of Home Birth Midwives of Catalonia wants to work together with obstetricians and neonatologists to achieve this interprofessional and institutional collaboration
Subject(s)
Humans , Female , Pregnancy , Infant, Newborn , Adult , Home Childbirth/statistics & numerical data , Midwifery , Patient Safety , Perinatal Care/statistics & numerical data , Nurse Midwives/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Health Systems/standards , Spain , Quality Assurance, Health Care/organization & administration , Quality Assurance, Health Care/statistics & numerical data , Perinatal Care , Perinatal Death/prevention & control , Interdisciplinary CommunicationABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: There are differences in the adoption rates of less invasive surfactant administration (LISA) worldwide. We aimed to describe and analyze the process of LISA introduction at the country level. METHODS: A standardized training program (33 courses covering >500 neonatologists) was followed by a cohort study. Data regarding consecutive LISA procedures were acquired over 12 months in 31 tertiary neonatal centers, using a dedicated on-line platform. RESULTS: Of 500 LISA procedures, 75% were performed by specialists and 25% by residents. The mean percentage share of LISA in all surfactant therapies was 24%, which represents a 6-fold increase compared to previous years. After 12 months, 76% of the procedures were rated "easy/very easy" vs 59% at baseline (p<0.05). Surfactant re-treatment rate was 15%. Twenty-three percent of infants required mechanical ventilation within 72 hours of life. Oxygen desaturation and surfactant reflux were the most frequent complications. Unlike previous reports describing exclusive use of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) during LISA, majority of procedures (63%) were carried out using nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation (NIPPV) or Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP). Efficacy of LISA with NIPPV or BiPAP was not significantly different from that with nCPAP (22.4% vs 24.5% of cases requiring intubation). Ventilation was provided with nasal cannulas or nasal masks (90%) and rarely with "RAM" cannulas or nasopharyngeal tubes. Rigid catheters were preferred (88.4%); tracheal insertion was successful at first attempt in 87% of cases. Majority of infants (79%) received no premedication prior to the procedure and almost all were given caffeine citrate. Median time of instillation was 1.5 minutes. CONCLUSIONS: The LISA procedure does not appear to be technically difficult to master. Training combining theory with practical exercises is an efficient implementation strategy. Variations in adoption rates indicate the need for additional, more personalized teachings in some centers.
Subject(s)
Health Plan Implementation/statistics & numerical data , Positive-Pressure Respiration/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Pulmonary Surfactants/administration & dosage , Respiratory Distress Syndrome, Newborn/therapy , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Internship and Residency/organization & administration , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Male , Neonatologists/education , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Poland , Positive-Pressure Respiration/adverse effects , Positive-Pressure Respiration/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/organization & administration , Prospective StudiesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: To describe preventive, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies regarding necrotising enterocolitis in Spain and to identify the strengths, areas of further improvement, and future research lines. METHODS: Two questionnaires on the management of preterm infants less than 32 weeks, at risk of, or with diagnosed necrotising enterocolitis, were distributed among selected representatives of the surgeons and neonatologists of the Spanish Neonatal Network (SEN1500) participant hospitals with a Paediatric Surgery Department. RESULTS: Percentage of response was 77.1% of contacted surgeons and 88.6% of neonatologists. There is a written protocol on the diagnosis and medical management of necrotising enterocolitis in 52% of the hospitals, and as regards surgical treatment in 33%. There is wide access to donor bank milk and to staff dedicated to breastfeeding promotion (87%). On the contrary, only 52% of the centres perform delayed cord clamping, and probiotics are used in just 23%. The use of abdominal ultrasound is increasing. There are no large differences as regards duration of antibiotic use and bowel rest, whereas there was as regards antibiotic selection, surgical indication, and type of intervention. CONCLUSIONS: As regards prevention, delayed cord clamping and extended access to donor milk are two possible aspects of further improvement. The observed discrepancies noted in diagnostic and therapeutic aspects are common in precisely the areas where evidence in the literature is weakest.
Subject(s)
Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/therapy , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surgeons/statistics & numerical data , Anti-Bacterial Agents/administration & dosage , Cross-Sectional Studies , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/diagnosis , Enterocolitis, Necrotizing/prevention & control , Health Care Surveys , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Infant, Premature , Milk Banks/supply & distribution , Probiotics/administration & dosage , SpainABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neonatologist performed echocardiography (NPE) has increasingly been used to assess the hemodynamic status in neonates. Aim of this survey was to investigate the utilization of NPE in Italian neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). METHODS: We conducted an on-line survey from June to September 2017. A questionnaire was developed by the Italian neonatal cardiology study group and was sent to each Italian NICU. RESULTS: The response rate was 77%. In 94% of Italian NICUs functional echocardiography was used by neonatologists, cardiologists or both (57, 15 and 28% respectively). All the respondents used NPE in neonates with patent ductus arteriosus and persistent pulmonary hypertension, 93% in neonates with hypotension or shock, 85% in neonates with perinatal asphyxia, 78% in suspicion of cardiac tamponade, and 73% for line positioning. In 30% of center, there was no NPE protocol. Structural echocardiography in stable and critically ill neonates was performed exclusively by neonatologists in 46 and 36% of center respectively. CONCLUSIONS: NPE is widely used in Italian NICUs by neonatologists. Structural echocardiography is frequently performed by neonatologists. Institutional protocols for NPE are lacking. There is an urgent need of a formal training process and accreditation to standardize the use of NPE.
Subject(s)
Echocardiography/statistics & numerical data , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Hemodynamics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Italy , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical approach used by neonatologists for diagnosis of congenital/perinatal infections (CPI); no such data currently exist. STUDY DESIGN: A national survey regarding the diagnosis of toxoplasma, syphilis, rubella, cytomegalovirus, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection in neonates. RESULT: We received 553 (11%) responses. Central nervous system calcification or hydrocephalus was the commonest trigger to pursue a CPI diagnosis (98%); maternal history was the least frequent (67%). Four hundred twenty-two (76%) used general screening such as "TORCH titer screen" (57%) or total IgG or IgM (39%). Further evaluation targeted known clinical sequelae; but cerebrospinal fluid testing was used in only 65% of those suspected of having HSV or syphilis. Fifty-six percent chose a treponemal instead of a non-treponemal test for syphilis. Multivariable analyses did not identify factors associated with the clinical diagnostic approach. CONCLUSION: We observed clinically important deviations from CPI diagnostic test recommendations in a national cohort of neonatologists.
Subject(s)
Fetal Diseases/diagnosis , Infant, Newborn, Diseases/diagnosis , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Decision-Making , Cytomegalovirus Infections/diagnosis , Female , Herpes Simplex/diagnosis , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Logistic Models , Multivariate Analysis , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Pregnancy , Rubella/diagnosis , Surveys and Questionnaires , Syphilis/diagnosis , Toxoplasmosis, Congenital/diagnosis , United StatesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) is highly prevalent in extremely low birth weight (ELBW), preterm infants. There are diverse management approaches for the PDA in ELBW infants. The objectives of this research were to identify current PDA management practices among cardiologists and neonatologists in the United States, describe any significant differences in management, and describe areas where practices align. METHODS: A survey of 10 questions based on the management of PDA in ELBW infants was conducted among 100 prominent neonatologists from 74 centers and 103 prominent cardiologists from 75 centers. Among the cardiologists, approximately 50% were interventionists who perform transcatheter PDA closures (TCPC). Fisher's exact test was performed to compare practice variations among neonatologists and cardiologists. A potentially biased audience including a combination of health care providers belonging to cardiology, neonatology, and surgery were also surveyed during the International PDA Symposium. The results of this survey were not included for statistical comparison, due to this audience being potentially influenced by the Symposium. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were identified between neonatologists and cardiologists regarding the impact of PDA closure on morbidity and mortality, with 80% cardiologists responding that it does vs 54% of neonatologists (P < 0.001), the need for PDA closure (P < .001), and the preferred method of PDA closure if indicated (P < .001). There was agreement between neonatologists and cardiologists on symptomatic therapy; however more neonatologists favored watchful waiting over intervention in contrast to more cardiologists favoring intervention over observation (77% vs 95%, P < .001). Survey responses also identified a need for further training and research on TCPC. CONCLUSION: Neonatologists and cardiologists have notable differences in managing PDA, and continued discussion across cardiology and neonatology has the potential to facilitate more of a consensus on best management practices. Further investigation is needed to identify outcomes in transcatheter PDA closure, particularly in ELBW infants.
Subject(s)
Cardiac Surgical Procedures/standards , Cardiologists/statistics & numerical data , Disease Management , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/surgery , Infant, Extremely Low Birth Weight , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Ductus Arteriosus, Patent/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Infant, Newborn , United States/epidemiologyABSTRACT
The purpose of this cross-sectional descriptive study is to explore pediatricians' and neonatologists' attitudes and standpoints on end-of-life (EOL) decision-making in neonates. Seventy-five physicians, employed fulltime to care for newborns in 23 hospitals in Jordan, completed internationally accepted questionnaires. Most physicians (75%) were supportive of using life-sustaining interventions, irrespective of the severity of the newborns' prognosis and the potential burden of the neonates' disabilities on their families. The general attitude of the physicians (59-88%) was against making decisions that limit life support at EOL; even those infants with what are, in fact, untreatable and disabling medical conditions (56-88%). Most physicians (77%) indicated that ethics committees should be involved in EOL decision-making based on requests from parents, physicians, or both. The results of this study indicate strong pro-life attitudes among the physicians whose role is to take care of infants in Jordan. The results also emphasize the need for (1) the creation of clear EOL-focused regulations and guidelines, (2) the establishment of special ethical committees to inform and assist healthcare providers' efforts during EOL care, and (3) raised awareness and competencies regarding EOL and ethical decision-making among physicians taking care of newborns in Jordan's intensive care units.
Subject(s)
Decision Making/ethics , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal , Neonatologists/ethics , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Physicians/ethics , Physicians/statistics & numerical data , Terminal Care/standards , Adult , Attitude to Death , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Jordan , Male , Neonatologists/psychology , Physicians/psychology , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
AIMS: To determine the use of oral dextrose gel to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia in New Zealand (NZ), to identify barriers and enablers to the implementation of the guideline and to determine if there is variation in management between clinical disciplines caring for at-risk babies. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to clinicians (including doctors, midwives and nurses) caring for babies with neonatal hypoglycaemia via stakeholders and maternity hospitals. RESULTS: A total of 251 clinicians from all 20 District Health Boards (DHBs) completed the survey. Of the responding clinicians, 148 (59%) from 15 (75%) DHBs reported oral dextrose gel use in their hospital, and of these, 129 (87%) reported a local guideline. In 12 of 15 (80%) DHBs, oral dextrose gel could be prescribed by midwives. For a clinical scenario of a baby with neonatal hypoglycaemia, doctors were more likely to prescribe oral dextrose gel than midwives (odds ratio (95% confidence interval), 2.9 (2.2-3.8), P < 0.0001). Of 32 possible combinations of treatment options for this scenario, 31 were selected by one or more clinicians. A guideline was perceived to be the most useful enabler, and availability of oral dextrose gel was seen as the most important barrier. CONCLUSIONS: Oral dextrose gel is widely used to treat neonatal hypoglycaemia in NZ. Increasing availability of dextrose gel and the clinical practice guideline are likely to further increase the use of oral dextrose gel.
Subject(s)
Glucose/administration & dosage , Hypoglycemia/diagnosis , Hypoglycemia/drug therapy , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Administration, Oral , Blood Glucose/analysis , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Gels , Health Care Surveys , Hospitals, Maternity , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Male , Midwifery/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , New Zealand , Nurses, Neonatal/statistics & numerical data , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
AIM: We surveyed whether clinicians used the WhatsApp messaging application to view neonatal chest radiographs and asked a sub-sample to compare them with computer screen viewings. METHODS: The study was conducted at three university-affiliated medical centres in Israel from June-December 2016. Questionnaires on using smartphones for professional purposes were completed by 68/71 paediatric residents and 20/28 neonatologists. In addition, 11 neonatologists viewed 20 chest radiographs on a computer screen followed by a smartphone and 10 viewed the same radiographs in the opposite order, separated by a washout period of 2 months. After another 2 months, five from each group viewed the same radiographs on a computer screen. Different interpretations between viewing modes were assessed. RESULTS: Most respondents used WhatsApp to send chest radiographs for consultation: 82% of the paediatric residents and 80% of the neonatologists. The mean number of inconsistencies in diagnosis was 3.7/20 between two computer views and 2.9/20 between computer and smartphone views (p = 0.88) and the disease severity means were 3.7/20 and 2.85/20, respectively (p = 0.94). Neonatologists using WhatsApp only determined umbilical line placement in 80% of cases. CONCLUSION: WhatsApp was reliable for preliminary interpretation of neonatal chest radiographs, but caution was needed when assessing umbilical lines.
Subject(s)
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted/methods , Mobile Applications/statistics & numerical data , Radiography, Thoracic/methods , Smartphone/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Academic Medical Centers , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Information Dissemination/methods , Internship and Residency/statistics & numerical data , Israel , Male , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Introduction: Outcomes for premature and critically ill neonates are improved with care provided by neonatologists in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). For smaller hospitals, maintaining the personnel and equipment necessary for the delivery and care of unexpectedly high-risk neonates is a significant challenge. To address this disparity in access, telemedicine has been increasingly used to support providers, patients, and their families in community newborn nurseries and NICUs. The purpose of this review is to present the current state of the use of telemedicine by regional NICUs to support community newborn nurseries, NICUs, and families. Methods: A literature review was conducted by two independent reviewers. Articles were selected for inclusion if they described the use of telemedicine with neonates or in the NICU. Two reviewers assessed the quality of the articles using the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Study Quality Assessment Tools. Results: Fourteen articles were identified. After consensus discussion, eight of the articles were rated good and six were rated fair by the two reviewers. Many of the articles suggested improvements in quality of care, family satisfaction, and reductions in the cost of care. Unfortunately, a majority of the studies to date have had small sample sizes or were performed in a single institution and lacked robust evaluations of patient- and family-centered outcomes and provider decision making. Conclusions: While these early studies are promising, more robust studies involving more patients and more institutions are needed to identify opportunities where telemedicine can impact health outcomes, patient-centeredness, or costs of care of neonates.
Subject(s)
Critical Illness/therapy , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Telemedicine/statistics & numerical data , Critical Illness/epidemiology , Female , Healthcare Disparities/economics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Intensive Care Units, Neonatal/organization & administration , Male , Specialization/statistics & numerical data , United StatesABSTRACT
Sagittal synostosis (SS) is the commonest form of craniosynostosis. Children with sagittal synostosis in Ireland are treated in the National Paediatric Craniofacial Centre (NPCC) in Temple Street Children's University Hospital. This retrospective study analysed the correlation between referral patterns to the unit and age at operation. The notes of 81 patients referred over a 5-year period (April 2008 - April 2013) to the NPCC with non-syndromic SS were reviewed and demographics and referral information were recorded. Of 81 patients reviewed, 60 (74%) were referred before 6 months of age, while 21 (26%) had late referrals. Neonatologists referred 100% of infants before 6 months, paediatricians referred 71%, and GPs 64%. Later referral was associated with a more complex referral pathway, including multiple-steps of referral and unnecessary investigations. Improved clinician knowledge and emphasis on the importance of early referral may lead to a reduction in late referrals.
Subject(s)
Craniosynostoses/surgery , Referral and Consultation/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Child , Child, Preschool , General Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Ireland , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Pediatricians/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
AIM: American guidelines suggest that neonatal resuscitation be considered at 23 weeks of gestation, one week earlier than in the Netherlands, but how counselling practices differ at the threshold of viability is unknown. This pilot study compared prenatal periviability counselling in the two countries. METHODS: In 2013, a cross-sectional survey was sent to 121 Dutch neonatologists as part of a nationwide evaluation of prenatal counselling. In this pilot study, the same survey was sent to a convenience sample of 31 American neonatologists in 2014. The results were used to compare the organisation, content and decision-making processes in prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation between the two countries. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 17 (55%) American and 77 (64%) Dutch neonatologists. American neonatologists preferred to meet with parents more frequently, for longer periods of time, and to discuss more intensive care topics, including long-term complications, than Dutch neonatologists. Neonatologists from both countries preferred shared decision-making when deciding whether to initiate intensive care. CONCLUSION: Neonatologists in the United States and the Netherlands differed in their approach to prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation. Cross-cultural differences may play a role.
Subject(s)
Counseling/standards , Decision Making , Fetal Viability , Neonatologists/psychology , Neonatology/standards , Adult , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Pilot ProjectsABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether neonatologists show implicit racial and/or socioeconomic biases and whether these are predictive of recommendations at extreme periviability. STUDY DESIGN: A nationwide survey using a clinical vignette of a woman in labor at 232/7 weeks of gestation asked physicians how likely they were to recommend intensive vs comfort care. Participants were randomized to 1 of 4 versions of the vignette in which racial and socioeconomic stimuli were varied, followed by 2 implicit association tests (IATs). RESULTS: IATs revealed implicit preferences favoring white (mean IAT score = 0.48, P < .001) and greater socioeconomic status (mean IAT score = 0.73, P < .001). Multivariable linear regression analysis showed that physicians with implicit bias toward greater socioeconomic status were more likely than those without bias to recommend comfort care when presented with a patient of high socioeconomic status (P = .037). No significant effect was seen for implicit racial bias. CONCLUSIONS: Building on previous demonstrations of unconscious racial and socioeconomic biases among physicians and their predictive validity, our results suggest that unconscious socioeconomic bias influences recommendations when counseling at the limits of viability. Physicians who display a negative socioeconomic bias are less likely to recommend resuscitation when counseling women of high socioeconomic status. The influence of implicit socioeconomic bias on recommendations at periviability may influence neonatal healthcare disparities and should be explored in future studies.
Subject(s)
Attitude of Health Personnel , Counseling/statistics & numerical data , Healthcare Disparities/statistics & numerical data , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Prejudice/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Social Class , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
PURPOSE: Our goal was to garner opinions regarding neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians. We sought to evaluate obstacles to neonatal resuscitation training for obstetric physicians and possible solutions for implementation challenges. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We distributed a national survey via email to all neonatal-perinatal medicine fellowship directors and obstetrics & gynecology residency program directors in the United States. This survey was designed by a consensus method. RESULTS: Ninety-eight (53%) obstetric and fifty-seven (51%) neonatal program directors responded to our surveys. Eighty-eight percent of neonatologists surveyed believe that obstetricians should be neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) certified. The majority of surveyed obstetricians (>89%) believe that obstetricians should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Eighty-six percent of obstetric residents have completed training in NRP, but only 19% of obstetric attendings are NRP certified. Major barriers to NRP training that were identified include time, lack of national requirement, lack of belief it is helpful, and cost. CONCLUSIONS: Most obstetric attendings are not NRP certified, but the majority of respondents believe that obstetric providers should have some neonatal resuscitation training. Our study demonstrates that most respondents support a modified neonatal resuscitation course for obstetric physicians.
Subject(s)
Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Obstetrics/standards , Resuscitation/education , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Obstetrics/education , Surveys and QuestionnairesABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Neonatal acute kidney injury (AKI) occurs in 40 to 70% of critically ill neonatal intensive care admissions. This study explored the differences in perceptions and practice variations among neonatologists and pediatric nephrologists in diagnostic criteria, management, and follow-up of neonatal AKI. METHODS: A survey weblink was emailed to nephrologists and neonatologists in Australia, Canada, New Zealand, India, and the United States. Questions consisted of demographic and unit practices, three clinical scenarios assessing awareness of definitions of neonatal AKI, knowledge, management, and follow-up practices. RESULTS: Many knowledge gaps among neonatologists, and to a lesser extent, pediatric nephrologists were identified. Neonatologists were less likely to use categorical definitions of neonatal AKI (p < 0.00001) or diagnose stage 1 AKI (p < 0.00001) than pediatric nephrologists. Guidelines for creatinine monitoring for nephrotoxic medications were reported by 34% (aminoglycosides) and 62% (indomethacin) of respondents. Nephrologists were more likely to consider follow-up after AKI than neonatologists (p < 0.00001). Also, 92 and 86% of neonatologists and nephrologists, respectively, reported no standardization or infrastructure for long-term renal follow-up. CONCLUSION: Neonatal AKI is underappreciated, particularly among neonatologists. A lack of evidence on neonatal AKI contributes to this variation in response. Therefore, dissemination of current knowledge and areas for research should be the priority.
Subject(s)
Acute Kidney Injury/diagnosis , Acute Kidney Injury/therapy , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Nephrologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Acute Kidney Injury/epidemiology , Australia , Canada , Dialysis , Female , Humans , India , Infant, Newborn , Male , New Zealand , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD). Screening strategies, a thorough investigation of co-morbidities, and multidisciplinary involvement prior to anti-PH medications have been advocated by recent guidelines. We sought to evaluate current practices of neonatologists caring for premature infants with PH. DESIGN: Electronic survey of American Academy of Pediatrics neonatology members. RESULTS: Among 306 neonatologist respondents, 38% had an institutional screening protocol for patients with BPD; 83% screened at 36 weeks for premature neonates on oxygen/mechanical ventilation. In those practicing more than 5 years, 54% noted increasing numbers of premature infants diagnosed with PH. Evaluation for PH in BPD patients included evaluations for micro-aspiration (41%), airways anomalies (29%), and catheterization (10%). Some degree of acquired pulmonary vein stenosis was encountered in 47%. A majority (90%) utilized anti-PH medications during the neonatal hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Screening for PH in BPD, and subsequent evaluation and management is highly variable.
Subject(s)
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/complications , Hypertension, Pulmonary/diagnosis , Infant, Premature , Neonatal Screening/methods , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/diagnosis , Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia/therapy , Humans , Hypertension, Pulmonary/etiology , Hypertension, Pulmonary/therapy , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Oxygen Inhalation Therapy , Respiration, ArtificialABSTRACT
AIM: Therapeutic hypothermia is standard of care in term infants with moderate-to-severe hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE). The goal of this survey was to explore the attitudes of U.S. neonatologists caring for infants with HIE who fall outside of current guidelines. METHODS: Case-based survey administered to members of the Section on Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine of the American Academy of Pediatrics. RESULTS: A total of 447 responses were analysed, a response rate of 19%. We found significant variability amongst U.S. neonatologists with regard to the use of therapeutic hypothermia for infants with HIE who fall outside standard inclusion criteria. Scenarios with the most variability included HIE in a late preterm infant and HIE following a postnatal code. Provision of therapeutic hypothermia outside of standard guidelines was not influenced by number of years in practice, neonatal intensive care type (NICU) or NICU size. CONCLUSION: Significant variability in practice exists when caring for infants with HIE who do not meet standard inclusion criteria, emphasizing the need for continued and rigorous research in this area.
Subject(s)
Hypothermia, Induced , Hypoxia-Ischemia, Brain/therapy , Neonatologists/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Neonatology/methods , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Practice Patterns, Physicians' , Surveys and Questionnaires , United StatesABSTRACT
Background Neonatologists have varying counseling practices for women with threatened periviable pregnancies. Previous research has suggested this variability may be influenced by social and economic factors of the mother. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the relative influence of maternal factors in counseling recommendations for periviable pregnancies. Methods A national cohort of neonatologists was sent a web-based survey. Five maternal characteristics were varied across eight vignettes: age, education, race, parity, and pregnancy "intendedness." Following each vignette, participants reported their likelihood to recommend full resuscitation versus comfort care. Conjoint analysis was used to assess the relative influence of each factor on respondents' recommendations. Results Responses from 328 neonatologists were included. Of the five tested maternal characteristics, parity and intendedness had the highest importance scores (40.2 and 35.0), followed by race, education, and age. If parents requested resuscitation, respondents were highly likely to comply with preferences, with little variation across vignettes. Conclusion Fetal-specific factors such as gestational age and estimated weight are known to influence counseling and decision making for extremely preterm infants. Our results suggest that maternal factors may also influence counseling practices, although physicians are likely to comply with parental preferences regardless of maternal factors. Future research should identify how maternal characteristics impact actual counseling practices.